pith. machine review for the scientific record.
sign in

arxiv: 2509.05052 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-05 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Semi-classical spacetime thermodynamics

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 19:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords semi-classical gravitydilaton gravityhorizon thermodynamicsconformal anomalyWald entropygeneralized entropyBrans-Dicke theoryquantum backreaction
0
0 comments X

The pith

In 2D dilaton gravity the semi-classical dynamics follow from thermodynamics on local stretched light cones once the conformal anomaly modifies the generalized entropy to include quantum matter backreaction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to obtain the equations of semi-classical gravity by applying the first law of thermodynamics to small local causal surfaces rather than to global black hole horizons. In the controlled setting of two-dimensional dilaton gravity the authors treat the backreaction of quantum fields by adding the conformal anomaly contribution to the entropy. A sympathetic reader would see this as evidence that gravitational dynamics, including their quantum corrections, can be viewed as thermodynamic relations on light-like surfaces. The same logic is used to clarify the correct entropy to employ when deriving equations of motion in classical scalar-tensor theories such as Brans-Dicke. The work also sketches how the same thermodynamic starting point might be extended to four-dimensional semi-classical gravity.

Core claim

We derive the semi-classical gravitational dynamics from thermodynamics of local stretched light cones in 2-dimensional dilaton gravity, explicitly treating the backreaction of quantum matter through the conformal anomaly's effect on the generalized entropy. For the class of Brans-Dicke theories, including 2-dimensional dilaton gravity, we show that the equations of motion follow from the dynamical Wald entropy associated with local causal horizons.

What carries the argument

Generalized entropy modified by the conformal anomaly, evaluated on local stretched light cones, whose first-law variation reproduces the semi-classical equations.

If this is right

  • Quantum matter backreaction enters the gravitational dynamics solely through its effect on the entropy of local light-like surfaces.
  • The same thermodynamic derivation recovers the classical equations of motion when the Wald entropy is used for Brans-Dicke theories.
  • The approach can be carried over to four-dimensional semi-classical gravity by retaining the appropriate conformal anomaly in the entropy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the local thermodynamic derivation holds, horizon entropy may serve as a systematic way to incorporate successive orders of quantum corrections without solving the full quantum field theory.
  • Similar constructions could be tested in other modified-gravity models where the entropy functional is already known.
  • The result suggests that the thermodynamic origin of gravity may persist even after quantum fields are included, provided the entropy is defined on sufficiently local surfaces.

Load-bearing premise

That the first law applied to these local surfaces with only the conformal-anomaly correction in the entropy is sufficient to recover the complete semi-classical dynamics without further regularization or state-dependent additions.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation in a solvable 2D dilaton model in which the thermodynamic variation produces a different backreaction term than the standard semi-classical equations of motion.

read the original abstract

We derive the semi-classical gravitational dynamics from thermodynamics of local stretched light cones in 2-dimensional dilaton gravity, explicitly treating the backreaction of quantum matter through the conformal anomaly's effect on the generalized entropy. We also sketch the extension of this analysis to the conformal anomaly in 4-dimensional semi-classical gravity. In direct connection to this problem, we also tackle the appropriate definition of Wald entropy in thermodynamic derivation of equations of motion for classical scalar-tensor theories. For the class of Brans-Dicke theories, including 2-dimensional dilaton gravity, we show that the equations of motion follow from the dynamical Wald entropy associated with local causal horizons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to derive the semi-classical gravitational dynamics from the thermodynamics of local stretched light cones in 2-dimensional dilaton gravity, incorporating the backreaction of quantum matter through the conformal anomaly's effect on the generalized entropy. It also tackles the definition of Wald entropy for thermodynamic derivations in classical scalar-tensor theories and shows that the equations of motion for Brans-Dicke theories (including 2D dilaton gravity) follow from the dynamical Wald entropy associated with local causal horizons, while sketching an extension to 4D semi-classical gravity.

Significance. If the derivation is free of circularity and fully captures the quantum backreaction, the result would be significant for establishing a thermodynamic origin of semi-classical gravity that includes explicit quantum corrections via the anomaly. This extends prior classical thermodynamic derivations and could clarify how entropy variations on local horizons encode gravitational dynamics with matter backreaction, offering a potential bridge between thermodynamic and field-theoretic approaches to gravity.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of semi-classical dynamics (around the 2D dilaton gravity analysis)] The central derivation applies the first law to local stretched light cones using generalized entropy modified solely by the conformal anomaly. This approach supplies only the universal c-number contribution from the anomaly; the manuscript must demonstrate explicitly (e.g., via the variation in the relevant section deriving the semi-classical equations) that state-dependent pieces of the quantum stress-tensor expectation value are automatically generated without additional regularization or state choice. If these terms are omitted, the derived dynamics are incomplete.
  2. [Wald entropy definition and Brans-Dicke analysis] The treatment of Wald entropy for Brans-Dicke theories claims that the equations of motion follow from the dynamical Wald entropy on local causal horizons. This risks circularity because the entropy functional is typically built from the same curvature and scalar-field terms that define the target dynamics; the manuscript should clarify the independence of the entropy definition from the equations being derived, perhaps by explicit comparison of the entropy variation to the known EOM.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the main results but contains no equations or key steps; adding a brief outline of the entropy variation or the resulting semi-classical equation would improve accessibility.
  2. [Notation and definitions] Notation for the dilaton field, the anomaly coefficient, and the stretched light-cone surfaces should be introduced once and used consistently to avoid reader confusion in the 2D and 4D sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We appreciate the positive assessment of the potential significance of the work. Below we address each major comment in turn, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Derivation of semi-classical dynamics (around the 2D dilaton gravity analysis)] The central derivation applies the first law to local stretched light cones using generalized entropy modified solely by the conformal anomaly. This approach supplies only the universal c-number contribution from the anomaly; the manuscript must demonstrate explicitly (e.g., via the variation in the relevant section deriving the semi-classical equations) that state-dependent pieces of the quantum stress-tensor expectation value are automatically generated without additional regularization or state choice. If these terms are omitted, the derived dynamics are incomplete.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation. The conformal anomaly term in the generalized entropy is indeed a c-number, but the full variation of the entropy on the stretched light cones incorporates the complete expectation value of the quantum stress tensor, including its state-dependent contributions. These arise directly from the matter-field dependence in the entropy functional and from the definition of the local horizon generators, without requiring an extra regularization step or a specific choice of quantum state beyond the standard setup used for the anomaly. In the section deriving the semi-classical equations, the first-law variation already encodes these terms through the backreaction. To make this explicit, we will add a detailed step-by-step expansion of the entropy variation that isolates the state-dependent pieces and shows they match the known form of <T_mu nu> in 2D dilaton gravity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Wald entropy definition and Brans-Dicke analysis] The treatment of Wald entropy for Brans-Dicke theories claims that the equations of motion follow from the dynamical Wald entropy on local causal horizons. This risks circularity because the entropy functional is typically built from the same curvature and scalar-field terms that define the target dynamics; the manuscript should clarify the independence of the entropy definition from the equations being derived, perhaps by explicit comparison of the entropy variation to the known EOM.

    Authors: We agree that clarifying the logical order is essential. The Wald entropy is constructed via the standard Noether-charge procedure applied to the diffeomorphism-invariant Lagrangian of the Brans-Dicke theory; this construction depends only on the form of the action and does not presuppose the equations of motion. We then evaluate the dynamical variation of this entropy on local causal horizons and demonstrate that the resulting first-law relation reproduces the known Brans-Dicke equations. To address the concern directly, we will insert an explicit side-by-side comparison in the revised manuscript: the entropy variation is written out term by term and shown to be identical to the left-hand side of the Brans-Dicke field equations (including the scalar-field equation) without any prior imposition of those equations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Wald entropy used to derive EOM in Brans-Dicke/dilaton gravity reduces to input Lagrangian terms by construction

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "For the class of Brans-Dicke theories, including 2-dimensional dilaton gravity, we show that the equations of motion follow from the dynamical Wald entropy associated with local causal horizons."

    Wald entropy is defined as the Noether charge associated with the Killing vector on the horizon of a diffeomorphism-invariant Lagrangian. Inserting this entropy into the thermodynamic first law and varying therefore reproduces the Euler-Lagrange equations of the original Lagrangian by algebraic identity, without new dynamical content. The paper presents this recovery as a derivation of the dynamics from thermodynamics, but the entropy functional already encodes the curvature and dilaton terms that define those dynamics.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation applies the first law to local stretched light cones with generalized entropy (Wald plus conformal anomaly) to recover semi-classical dynamics in 2D dilaton gravity. However, the load-bearing step for classical Brans-Dicke theories states that EOM follow from dynamical Wald entropy on causal horizons. Wald entropy is the Noether charge constructed directly from the diffeomorphism-invariant Lagrangian whose variation yields the target EOM; thus the thermodynamic identity recovers the EOM by construction once the entropy functional is inserted. The conformal-anomaly modification supplies only the universal c-number piece and does not independently generate state-dependent <T> backreaction without additional assumptions. This matches the self-definitional pattern and justifies the reader's 6.0 assessment. No machine-checked external benchmark or parameter-free derivation outside the fitted entropy is exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents exhaustive ledger; no explicit free parameters or new entities are named, but the approach relies on standard assumptions about horizon thermodynamics.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Thermodynamic first law applies to local stretched light cones in curved spacetime
    Invoked as the starting point for deriving dynamics from entropy variations.
  • domain assumption Conformal anomaly correctly modifies generalized entropy to capture quantum backreaction
    Central to treating backreaction explicitly in the 2D case.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5631 in / 1104 out tokens · 44756 ms · 2026-05-18T19:05:19.248885+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We derive the semi-classical gravitational dynamics from thermodynamics of local stretched light cones in 2-dimensional dilaton gravity, explicitly treating the backreaction of quantum matter through the conformal anomaly’s effect on the generalized entropy.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages · 49 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Black holes and the second law,Lett. Nuovo Cim.4(1972) 737–740

  2. [2]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333–2346

  3. [3]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199–220

  4. [4]

    S. W. Hawking,Black Holes and Thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 191–197

  5. [5]

    Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State

    T. Jacobson,Thermodynamics of spacetime: The einstein equation of state,Phys. Rev. Lett. 75(1995) 1260–1263, [gr-qc/9504004]

  6. [6]

    Classical and Quantum Thermodynamics of horizons in spherically symmetric spacetimes

    T. Padmanabhan,Classical and quantum thermodynamics of horizons in spherically symmetric space-times,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5387–5408, [gr-qc/0204019]

  7. [7]

    The Holography of Gravity encoded in a relation between Entropy, Horizon area and Action for gravity

    T. Padmanabhan,The Holography of gravity encoded in a relation between entropy, horizon area and action for gravity,Gen. Rel. Grav.34(2002) 2029–2035, [gr-qc/0205090]

  8. [8]

    Thermodynamic route to Field equations in Lanczos-Lovelock Gravity

    A. Paranjape, S. Sarkar and T. Padmanabhan,Thermodynamic route to field equations in Lancos-Lovelock gravity,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 104015, [hep-th/0607240]

  9. [9]

    Entropy of Null Surfaces and Dynamics of Spacetime

    T. Padmanabhan and A. Paranjape,Entropy of null surfaces and dynamics of spacetime, Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 064004, [gr-qc/0701003]

  10. [10]

    M. K. Parikh and S. Sarkar,Beyond the Einstein Equation of State: Wald Entropy and Thermodynamical Gravity,Entropy18(2016) 119, [0903.1176]

  11. [11]

    Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics of Spacetime: the Role of Gravitational Dissipation

    G. Chirco and S. Liberati,Non-equilibrium thermodynamics of spacetime: the role of gravitational dissipation,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 024016, [0909.4194]

  12. [12]

    Clausius entropy for arbitrary bifurcate null surfaces

    V. Baccetti and M. Visser,Clausius entropy for arbitrary bifurcate null surfaces,Class. Quant. Grav31(2014) 035009, [1303.3185]

  13. [13]

    Horizon entropy and higher curvature equations of state

    R. Guedens, T. Jacobson and S. Sarkar,Horizon entropy and higher curvature equations of state,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 064017, [1112.6215]

  14. [14]

    Einstein's Equations from the Stretched Future Light Cone

    M. Parikh and A. Svesko,Einstein’s equations from the stretched future light cone,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) , [1712.08475]

  15. [15]

    Equilibrium to Einstein: Entanglement, Thermodynamics, and Gravity

    A. Svesko,Equilibrium to Einstein: Entanglement, thermodynamics, and gravity,Phys. Rev. D 99(2019) 086006, [1810.12236]

  16. [16]

    Jacobson and M

    T. Jacobson and M. Visser,Spacetime Equilibrium at Negative Temperature and the Attraction of Gravity,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28(2019) 1944016, [1904.04843]

  17. [17]

    Alonso-Serrano and M

    A. Alonso-Serrano and M. Liˇ ska,New perspective on thermodynamics of spacetime: The emergence of unimodular gravity and the equivalence of entropies,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 104056, [2008.04805]

  18. [18]

    Alonso-Serrano, L

    A. Alonso-Serrano, L. J. Garay and M. Liˇ ska,From spacetime thermodynamics to Weyl transverse gravity,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 064019, [2409.06645]

  19. [19]

    Kumar,Recovering semiclassical Einstein’s equation using generalized entropy,Gen

    N. Kumar,Recovering semiclassical Einstein’s equation using generalized entropy,Gen. Relativ. Gravit.55(2023) 127, [2404.16912]

  20. [20]

    Kumar,Non-linear equation of motion for higher curvature semiclassical gravity,Phys

    N. Kumar,Non-linear equation of motion for higher curvature semiclassical gravity,Phys. Lett. B861(2025) 139264, [2501.10527]. – 30 –

  21. [21]

    R. M. Wald,Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) R3427–R3431, [gr-qc/9307038]

  22. [22]

    Some Properties of Noether Charge and a Proposal for Dynamical Black Hole Entropy

    V. Iyer and R. M. Wald,Some properties of the Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 846–864, [gr-qc/9403028]

  23. [23]

    Entanglement Equilibrium and the Einstein Equation

    T. Jacobson,Entanglement equilibrium and the Einstein equation,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 201101, [1505.04753]

  24. [24]

    Thermodynamic Origin of the Null Energy Condition

    M. Parikh and A. Svesko,Thermodynamic Origin of the Null Energy Condition,Phys. Rev. D 95(2017) 104002, [1511.06460]

  25. [25]

    Logarithmic Corrections to Gravitational Entropy and the Null Energy Condition

    M. Parikh and A. Svesko,Logarithmic corrections to gravitational entropy and the null energy condition,Phys. Lett. B761(2016) 16–19, [1612.06949]

  26. [26]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3292–3300

  27. [27]

    The "physical process" version of the first law and the generalized second law for charged and rotating black holes

    S. Gao and R. M. Wald,“physical process version” of the first law and the generalized second law for charged and rotating black holes,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 084020, [gr-qc/0106071]

  28. [28]

    Entanglement equilibrium for higher order gravity

    P. Bueno, V. S. Min, A. J. Speranza and M. R. Visser,Entanglement equilibrium for higher order gravity,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 046003, [1612.04374]

  29. [29]

    Jacobson,Black hole entropy and induced gravity,2401.03572

    T. Jacobson,Black hole entropy and induced gravity,2401.03572

  30. [30]

    Black Hole Entropy in Canonical Quantum Gravity and Superstring Theory

    L. Susskind and J. Uglum,Black hole entropy in canonical quantum gravity and superstring theory,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 2700, [hep-th/9401070]

  31. [31]

    A Quantum Focussing Conjecture

    R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer and A. C. Wall,Quantum focusing conjecture,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 064044, [1506.02669]

  32. [32]

    State-Dependent Divergences in the Entanglement Entropy

    D. Marolf and A. C. Wall,State-dependent divergences in the entanglement entropy,J. High Energ. Phys.2016(2016) , [1607.01246]

  33. [33]

    Chandrasekaran, G

    V. Chandrasekaran and G. Penington,Large N algebras and generalized entropy,J. High Energ. Phys.2023(2023) , [2209.10454]

  34. [34]

    Kudler-Flam, S

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser and G. Satishchandran,Generalized black hole entropy is von Neumann entropy,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 025013, [2309.15897]

  35. [35]

    Jensen, J

    K. Jensen, J. Sorce and A. J. Speranza,Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity,J. High Energ. Phys.2023(2023) , [2306.01837]

  36. [36]

    J. F. Pedraza, A. Svesko and M. R. Sybesma, Watse.d Visser,Microcanonical action and the entropy of Hawking radiation,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 126010, [2111.06912]

  37. [37]

    J. F. Pedraza, A. Svesko, W. Sybesma and M. R. Visser,Semi-classical thermodynamics of quantum extremal surfaces in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,JHEP12(2021) 134, [2107.10358]

  38. [38]

    Svesko, E

    A. Svesko, E. Verheijden, E. P. Verlinde and M. R. Visser,Quasi-local energy and microcanonical entropy in two-dimensional nearly de Sitter gravity,JHEP08(2022) 075, [2203.00700]

  39. [39]

    Emparan, A

    R. Emparan, A. M. Frassino and B. Way,Quantum BTZ black hole,JHEP11(2020) 137, [2007.15999]. – 31 –

  40. [40]

    Panella, J

    E. Panella, J. F. Pedraza and A. Svesko,Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer, Universe10(2024) 358, [2407.03410]

  41. [41]

    J. D. Bardeen, B. Carter and S. W. Hawking,The four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun.Math. Phys.31(1973) 161

  42. [43]

    Banihashemi, T

    B. Banihashemi, T. Jacobson, A. Svesko and M. R. Visser,The minus sign in the first law of de Sitter horizons,J. High Energ. Phys.2023(2023) , [2208.11706]

  43. [44]

    Gravitation from Entanglement in Holographic CFTs

    T. Faulkner, M. Guica, T. Hartman, R. C. Myers and M. Van Raamsdonk,Gravitation from entanglement in holographic CFTs,J. High Energy Phys.2014(2014) , [1312.7856]

  44. [45]

    Nonlinear Gravity from Entanglement in Conformal Field Theories

    T. Faulkner, F. M. Haehl, E. Hijano, O. Parrikar, C. Rabideau and M. Van Raamsdonk, Nonlinear gravity from entanglement in conformal field theories,J. High Energy Phys.2017 (2017) , [1705.03026]

  45. [46]

    J. F. Pedraza, A. Russo and A. Svesko,Sewing spacetime with Lorentzian threads: complexity and the emergence of time in quantum gravity,JHEP2022(2022) , [2106.12585]

  46. [47]

    J. F. Pedraza, A. Russo, A. Svesko and Z. Weller-Davies,Computing spacetime,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D31(2022) 2242010, [2205.05705]

  47. [48]

    Carrasco, J

    R. Carrasco, J. F. Pedraza, A. Svesko and Z. Weller-Davies,Gravitation from optimized computation: Einstein and beyond,J. High Energ. Phys.2023(2023) , [2306.08503]

  48. [49]

    D. M. Capper and M. J. Duff,Trace anomalies in dimensional regularization,Nuovo Cim. A 23(1974) 173

  49. [50]

    R. J. Riegert,A non-local action for the trace anomaly,Phys. Lett. B134(1984) 56

  50. [51]

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseylin,Conformal anomaly in Weyl theory and anomaly free superconformal theories,Phys. Lett. B134(1984) 187

  51. [52]

    M. J. Duff,Twenty years of the Weyl anomaly,Class. Quant. Grav.11(1994) 1387, [hep-th/9308075]

  52. [53]

    J. M. Bardeen,Trace anomaly effective actions - a critique,gr-qc/1808.09629

  53. [54]

    Arrechea, G

    J. Arrechea, G. Neri and S. Liberati,Inner horizon instability via the trace anomaly effective action,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 084036, [2411.14964]

  54. [55]

    D. A. Lowe and L. Thorlacius,Effective Field Theory Description of Hawking Radiation, hep-th/2505.07722

  55. [56]

    A. M. Polyakov,Quantum geometry of bosonic strings,Phys. Lett. B103(1981) 207

  56. [57]

    Weyl Invariance and Black Hole Evaporation

    J. Navarro-Salas, M. Navarro and C. F. Talavera,Weyl invariance and black hole evaporation, Phys. Lett. B356(1995) 217, [hep-th/9505139]

  57. [58]

    Teitelboim,Gravitation and hamiltonian structure in two spacetime dimensions,Phys

    C. Teitelboim,Gravitation and hamiltonian structure in two spacetime dimensions,Phys. Lett. B126(1983) 41

  58. [59]

    Jackiw,Lower dimensional gravity,Phys

    R. Jackiw,Lower dimensional gravity,Phys. Lett. B252(1985) 343

  59. [60]

    Reversible and Irreversible Spacetime Thermodynamics for General Brans-Dicke Theories

    G. Chirco, C. Eling and S. Liberati,Reversible and irreversible spacetime thermodynamics for general Brans-Dicke theories,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 024032, [1011.1405]. – 32 –

  60. [61]

    R. Dey, S. Liberati and A. Mohd,Higher derivative gravity: Field equation as the equation of state,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 044013, [1605.04789]

  61. [62]

    Hollands, R

    S. Hollands, R. M. Wald and V. G. Zhang,The entropy of dynamical black holes,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024) 024070, [2402.00818]

  62. [63]

    M. R. Visser and Z. Yan,Properties of dynamical black hole entropy,J. High Energ. Phys. 2024(2024) , [2403.07140]

  63. [64]

    Brewin,Riemann normal coordinate expansions using Cadabra,Class

    L. Brewin,Riemann normal coordinate expansions using Cadabra,Class. Quant. Grav.26 (2009) 175017, [0903.2087]

  64. [65]

    L. C. Barbado and M. Visser,Unruh-DeWitt detector event rate for trajectories with time-dependent acceleration,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 084011, [1207.5525]

  65. [66]

    f(Lovelock) theories of gravity

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, O. A. Lasso and P. F. Ram´ ırez,f(lovelock) theories of gravity,J. High Energ. Phys.2016(2016) , [1602.07310]

  66. [67]

    Holographic Entanglement Entropy for General Higher Derivative Gravity

    X. Dong,Holographic entanglement entropy for general higher derivative gravity,J. High Energ. Phys.2014(2014) , [1310.5713]

  67. [68]

    A. C. Wall,A second law for higher curvature gravity,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24(2015) 1544014, [1504.08040]

  68. [69]

    On Black Hole Entropy

    T. Jacobson, G. Kang and R. C. Myers,On black hole entropy,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 6587–6598, [gr-qc/9312023]

  69. [70]

    Second Law Violations in Lovelock Gravity for Black Hole Mergers

    S. Sarkar and A. C. Wall,Second law violations in Lovelock gravity for black hole mergers, Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 26, [1011.4988]

  70. [71]

    Gadioux and H

    M. Gadioux and H. S. Reall,Creases, corners, and caustics: Properties of non-smooth structures on black hole horizons,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 084021, [2303.15512]

  71. [72]

    Comp` ere and A

    G. Comp` ere and A. Fiorucci,Advanced Lectures on General Relativity. Springer International Publishing, 2018, 10.1007/978-3-030-04260-8

  72. [73]

    Models of AdS_2 Backreaction and Holography

    A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski,Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography,JHEP2015 (2015) , [1402.6334]

  73. [74]

    J. G. Russo, L. Susskind and L. Thorlacius,Black hole evaporation in 1+1 dimensions,Phys. Lett. B292(1992) 13, [hep-th/9201074]

  74. [75]

    Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman and J. Maldacena,Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation,JHEP2020(2020) , [1911.12333]

  75. [76]

    A. J. Speranza,Entanglement entropy of excited states in conformal perturbation theory and the Einstein equation,JHEP2016(2016) , [1602.01380]

  76. [77]

    Comments on Jacobson's "Entanglement equilibrium and the Einstein equation"

    H. Casini, D. A. Galante and R. C. Myers,Comments on Jacobson’s “Entanglement equilibrium and the Einstein equation”,JHEP2016(2016) , [1601.00528]

  77. [78]

    R. M. Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics. Chicago Lectures in Physics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994

  78. [79]

    Relating black holes in two and three dimensions

    A. Ach´ ucarro and M. E. Ortiz,Relating black holes in two and three dimensions,Phys. Rev. D 48(1993) 3600, [hep-th/9304068]. – 33 –

  79. [80]

    Quantum evolution of near-extremal Reissner-Nordstrom black holes

    A. Fabbri, D. J. Navarro and J. Navarro-Salas,Quantum evolution of near-extremal Reissner–Nordstr¨ om black holes,Phys. Lett. B595(1995) 381, [hep-th/0006035]

  80. [81]

    On the Dynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes

    P. Nayak, A. Shukla, R. M. Soni, S. P. Trivedi and V. Vishal,On the dynamics of near-extremal black holes,JHEP2018(2018) , [1802.09547]

Showing first 80 references.