pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.06630 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-08 · ✦ hep-th · quant-ph

Positivity bounds from thermal field theory entropy

Xin-Yi Liu , Yongjun Xu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th quant-ph
keywords positivity boundsthermal field theoryeffective field theoryWilson coefficientsentropydimension-8 operatorsscalar theoriesthermodynamic constraints
0
0 comments X

The pith

Thermodynamic consistency requires the coefficient of the leading dimension-8 operator in scalar EFTs to be strictly positive.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes positivity bounds on effective field theories by examining the entropy of thermal quantum field systems rather than using scattering amplitudes. It computes the finite-temperature entropy for scalar theories that include higher-dimensional operators and shows that the requirement for entropy to increase when new degrees of freedom are added forces the Wilson coefficient of the leading dimension-8 operator to be positive. This provides an alternative perspective that connects thermodynamic principles directly to constraints on quantum field theory operators, complementing traditional approaches based on unitarity and causality.

Core claim

We present an approach to deriving positivity bounds on effective field theories by analyzing the thermodynamic behavior of thermal quantum field systems. Focusing on scalar theories with higher-dimensional operators, we compute the finite-temperature entropy using thermal field theory techniques. We argue that consistency with fundamental thermodynamic principles--specifically, the expectation that entropy increases with the introduction of new degrees of freedom--imposes nontrivial constraints on Wilson coefficients. In particular, we show that the coefficient of the leading dimension-8 operator must be strictly positive.

What carries the argument

Finite-temperature entropy calculated via thermal field theory in scalar EFTs with higher-dimensional operators, which enforces positivity of Wilson coefficients through the thermodynamic demand that entropy rises with added degrees of freedom.

If this is right

  • Positivity bounds on Wilson coefficients can be obtained from thermodynamic considerations in thermal field theory.
  • The coefficient of the leading dimension-8 operator in scalar theories must be strictly positive.
  • This method serves as an alternative to S-matrix derivations of positivity bounds.
  • It links entropy directly to constraints from unitarity and causality in quantum field theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This thermodynamic method could be applied to derive bounds in other types of effective field theories, such as those involving fermions or vector fields.
  • If valid, the approach might offer new ways to constrain EFTs in thermal environments or at finite density where S-matrix methods are less straightforward.
  • Exploring connections between this entropy-based bound and holographic principles in quantum gravity could reveal deeper relations between thermodynamics and operator positivity.

Load-bearing premise

The finite-temperature entropy computed for the scalar effective field theory with higher-dimensional operators correctly represents the system's thermodynamic entropy, and adding new degrees of freedom always increases this entropy without exceptions caused by the operators.

What would settle it

A calculation showing that the entropy decreases when new degrees of freedom are introduced in a scalar EFT with a negative dimension-8 coefficient would contradict the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06630 by Xin-Yi Liu, Yongjun Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Diagrams contributing to our condition. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present an approach to deriving positivity bounds on effective field theories by analyzing the thermodynamic behavior of thermal quantum field systems. Focusing on scalar theories with higher-dimensional operators, we compute the finite-temperature entropy using thermal field theory techniques. We argue that consistency with fundamental thermodynamic principles--specifically, the expectation that entropy increases with the introduction of new degrees of freedom--imposes nontrivial constraints on Wilson coefficients. In particular, we show that the coefficient of the leading dimension-8 operator must be strictly positive. This thermodynamic perspective offers an alternative to traditional S-matrix-based derivations of positivity bounds and provides a complementary perspective into the interplay between entropy, unitarity, and causality in quantum field theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes deriving positivity bounds on Wilson coefficients in scalar effective field theories by requiring that the finite-temperature entropy, computed via thermal field theory, increases upon inclusion of higher-dimensional operators, consistent with the thermodynamic expectation that new degrees of freedom raise entropy. It focuses on the leading dimension-8 operator and concludes that its coefficient must be strictly positive, offering this as an alternative to S-matrix positivity bounds.

Significance. A rigorously derived thermodynamic positivity bound would complement existing S-matrix and causality arguments by linking EFT constraints directly to entropy monotonicity in the thermal ensemble. If the explicit Matsubara-sum evaluation confirms a temperature-independent positive correction to entropy for positive c_8 within the EFT regime, the result would be a useful cross-check; however, the absence of that explicit computation in the current draft limits its immediate impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Main text (entropy computation section)] The central claim requires an explicit evaluation of the thermal correction to the free energy (or pressure) from the dimension-8 operator, followed by differentiation to obtain the entropy S = −(∂F/∂T)_V. No such Matsubara sum or one-loop integral is shown; the sign of the entropy correction is asserted rather than derived from the imaginary-time path integral with the higher-dimensional vertex. This step is load-bearing for the positivity conclusion.
  2. [Introduction and thermodynamic argument] The thermodynamic principle invoked—that entropy must increase with new degrees of freedom—is applied without specifying how the EFT cutoff and the operator itself affect the counting of degrees of freedom. It is unclear whether the correction remains positive for all temperatures inside the validity window or whether higher-order terms in the thermal expansion can flip the sign.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Section 2 (Lagrangian)] Define the precise form of the dimension-8 operator (e.g., whether it is (∂ϕ)^4/Λ^4 or another structure) and the normalization of its Wilson coefficient at the first appearance in the text.
  2. [Discussion] Add a brief comparison, even qualitative, to existing positivity bounds from dispersion relations or causality to clarify the novelty of the thermal approach.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below. Where appropriate, we have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the entropy computation and the thermodynamic argument.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Main text (entropy computation section)] The central claim requires an explicit evaluation of the thermal correction to the free energy (or pressure) from the dimension-8 operator, followed by differentiation to obtain the entropy S = −(∂F/∂T)_V. No such Matsubara sum or one-loop integral is shown; the sign of the entropy correction is asserted rather than derived from the imaginary-time path integral with the higher-dimensional vertex. This step is load-bearing for the positivity conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit evaluation is necessary to support the central claim. In the original draft the sign of the correction was inferred from the structure of the dimension-8 operator in the thermal effective potential, but the intermediate steps of the Matsubara sum were not displayed. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a dedicated subsection that performs the one-loop computation in the imaginary-time formalism. The free-energy shift induced by the higher-dimensional vertex is evaluated as a Matsubara sum; differentiation with respect to temperature then yields an entropy correction whose leading term is strictly positive for c_8 > 0 and temperature-independent inside the EFT validity window. This explicit derivation now underpins the positivity bound. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Introduction and thermodynamic argument] The thermodynamic principle invoked—that entropy must increase with new degrees of freedom—is applied without specifying how the EFT cutoff and the operator itself affect the counting of degrees of freedom. It is unclear whether the correction remains positive for all temperatures inside the validity window or whether higher-order terms in the thermal expansion can flip the sign.

    Authors: We have expanded the discussion in the introduction and in the thermodynamic-consistency section to address this concern. The argument is formulated at leading order in the high-temperature expansion, where the dimension-8 operator contributes an additive, positive correction to the entropy density for c_8 > 0. The EFT cutoff Λ enters by restricting the analysis to the regime T ≪ Λ, in which higher-dimensional operators and sub-leading thermal corrections are parametrically suppressed. Within this window the sign of the leading correction cannot be flipped by higher-order terms. We have added a short paragraph clarifying this restriction and noting that a non-perturbative treatment lies outside the present scope. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on explicit thermal computation and external thermodynamic principle

full rationale

The paper computes the finite-temperature entropy of a scalar EFT including higher-dimensional operators via standard thermal field theory (Matsubara sums and path-integral techniques). It then applies the independent thermodynamic expectation that entropy must increase when new degrees of freedom are introduced, thereby constraining the sign of the leading dimension-8 Wilson coefficient. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation, a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or an ansatz imported from the authors' prior work. The central result follows from performing the explicit thermal integral and comparing its sign to the monotonicity requirement, making the argument self-contained against external benchmarks rather than circular by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that entropy must increase upon addition of new degrees of freedom and on the validity of thermal field theory computations for an EFT truncated at dimension 8; no free parameters or new entities are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Entropy increases with the introduction of new degrees of freedom
    Invoked in the abstract as the fundamental thermodynamic principle that constrains the Wilson coefficients.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5628 in / 1286 out tokens · 78242 ms · 2026-05-18T18:29:19.340698+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Adams, N

    A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi, Causality, analyticity and an IR ob- struction to UV completion, JHEP10, 014, arXiv:hep- th/0602178

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    Bellazzini, M

    B. Bellazzini, M. Lewandowski, and J. Serra, Positiv- ity of Amplitudes, Weak Gravity Conjecture, and Mod- ified Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 251103 (2019), arXiv:1902.03250 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t. Huang, J.-Y. Liu, and G. N. Remmen, Causality, unitarity, and the weak gravity con- jecture, JHEP03, 083, arXiv:2109.13937 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Henriksson, B

    J. Henriksson, B. McPeak, F. Russo, and A. Vichi, Rig- orous bounds on light-by-light scattering, JHEP06, 158, arXiv:2107.13009 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  5. [5]

    Alberte, C

    L. Alberte, C. de Rham, S. Jaitly, and A. J. Tolley, QED positivity bounds, Phys. Rev. D103, 125020 (2021), arXiv:2012.05798 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Effective Field Theory

    P. Saraswat, Weak gravity conjecture and effec- tive field theory, Phys. Rev. D95, 025013 (2017), arXiv:1608.06951 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    A.Guerrieri, J.Penedones,andP.Vieira,WhereIsString Theory in the Space of Scattering Amplitudes?, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 081601 (2021), arXiv:2102.02847 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    T. N. Pham and T. N. Truong, Evaluation of the Deriva- tive Quartic Terms of the Meson Chiral Lagrangian From Forward Dispersion Relation, Phys. Rev. D31, 3027 (1985)

    work page 1985

  9. [9]

    M.R.PenningtonandJ.Portoles,TheChiralLagrangian parameters, l1, l2, are determined by the rho resonance, Phys. Lett. B344, 399 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9409426

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  10. [10]

    Energy's and amplitudes' positivity

    A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi, and E. Trincherini, Energy’s and amplitudes’ positivity, JHEP05, 095, [Erratum: JHEP 11, 128 (2011)], arXiv:0912.4258 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  11. [11]

    On Renormalization Group Flows in Four Dimensions

    Z. Komargodski and A. Schwimmer, On Renormaliza- tion Group Flows in Four Dimensions, JHEP12, 099, arXiv:1107.3987 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, Consistency of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, JHEP12, 032, arXiv:1908.09845 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1908

  13. [13]

    Herrero-Valea, I

    M. Herrero-Valea, I. Timiryasov, and A. Tokareva, To Positivity and Beyond, where Higgs-Dilaton Inflation has never gone before, JCAP11, 042, arXiv:1905.08816 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 1905

  14. [14]

    Beyond Amplitudes' Positivity and the Fate of Massive Gravity

    B. Bellazzini, F. Riva, J. Serra, and F. Sgarlata, Beyond Positivity Bounds and the Fate of Massive Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1710.02539 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Positivity Bounds for Scalar Theories

    C. de Rham, S. Melville, A. J. Tolley, and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds for scalar field theories, Phys. Rev. D 96, 081702 (2017), arXiv:1702.06134 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    UV complete me: Positivity Bounds for Particles with Spin

    C. de Rham, S. Melville, A. J. Tolley, and S.-Y. Zhou, UV complete me: Positivity Bounds for Particles with Spin, JHEP03, 011, arXiv:1706.02712 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Massive Galileon Positivity Bounds

    C. de Rham, S. Melville, A. J. Tolley, and S.-Y. Zhou, Massive Galileon Positivity Bounds, JHEP09, 072, arXiv:1702.08577 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Wang, F.-K

    Y.-J. Wang, F.-K. Guo, C. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Gen- eralized positivity bounds on chiral perturbation theory, JHEP07, 214, arXiv:2004.03992 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2004

  19. [19]

    Tokuda, K

    J. Tokuda, K. Aoki, and S. Hirano, Gravitational posi- tivity bounds, JHEP11, 054, arXiv:2007.15009 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2007

  20. [20]

    X. Li, H. Xu, C. Yang, C. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Pos- itivity in Multifield Effective Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 121601 (2021), arXiv:2101.01191 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Caron-Huot, D

    S. Caron-Huot, D. Mazac, L. Rastelli, and D. Simmons- Duffin, Sharp boundaries for the swampland, JHEP07, 110, arXiv:2102.08951 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Z.-Z. Du, C. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Triple crossing pos- itivity bounds for multi-field theories, JHEP12, 115, arXiv:2111.01169 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, and A. Zhiboedov, Gravita- tional effective field theory islands, low-spin dominance, and the four-graviton amplitude, J. Phys. A54, 344002 (2021), arXiv:2103.12728 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    X. Li, K. Mimasu, K. Yamashita, C. Yang, C. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Moments for positivity: using Drell-Yan data to test positivity bounds and reverse-engineer new physics, JHEP10, 107, arXiv:2204.13121 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    Causality constraints on corrections to Einstein gravity

    S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Causality constraints on corrections to Einstein gravity, JHEP05, 122, arXiv:2201.06602 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Herrero-Valea, R

    M. Herrero-Valea, R. Santos-Garcia, and A. Tokareva, Massless positivity in graviton exchange, Phys. Rev. D 104, 085022 (2021), arXiv:2011.11652 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Elias Miro, A

    J. Elias Miro, A. Guerrieri, and M. A. Gumus, Bridging positivityandS-matrixbootstrapbounds,JHEP05,001, arXiv:2210.01502 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Bellazzini, M

    B. Bellazzini, M. Riembau, and F. Riva, IR side of positivity bounds, Phys. Rev. D106, 105008 (2022), arXiv:2112.12561 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Sinha and A

    A. Sinha and A. Zahed, Crossing Symmetric Dispersion Relations in Quantum Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 181601 (2021), arXiv:2012.04877 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Trott, Causality, unitarity and symmetry in effective field theory, JHEP07, 143, arXiv:2011.10058 [hep-ph]

    T. Trott, Causality, unitarity and symmetry in effective field theory, JHEP07, 143, arXiv:2011.10058 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011

  31. [31]

    Herrero-Valea, A

    M. Herrero-Valea, A. S. Koshelev, and A. Tokareva, UV graviton scattering and positivity bounds from IR dispersion relations, Phys. Rev. D106, 105002 (2022), arXiv:2205.13332 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Hong, Z.-H

    D.-Y. Hong, Z.-H. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Causal- ity bounds on scalar-tensor EFTs, JHEP10, 135, arXiv:2304.01259 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Chiang, Y.-t

    L.-Y. Chiang, Y.-t. Huang, W. Li, L. Rodina, and H.- C. Weng, (Non)-projective bounds on gravitational EFT, (2022), arXiv:2201.07177 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Carving out the Space of Open-String S-matrix,

    Y.-t. Huang, J.-Y. Liu, L. Rodina, and Y. Wang, Carving out the Space of Open-String S-matrix, JHEP04, 195, arXiv:2008.02293 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2008

  35. [35]

    T.NoumiandJ.Tokuda,Gravitationalpositivitybounds on scalar potentials, Phys. Rev. D104, 066022 (2021), arXiv:2105.01436 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Xu and S.-Y

    H. Xu and S.-Y. Zhou, Triple crossing positivity bounds, mass dependence and cosmological scalars: Horndeski theory and DHOST, JCAP11, 076, arXiv:2306.06639 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Q. Chen, K. Mimasu, T. A. Wu, G.-D. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Capping the positivity cone: dimension- 8 Higgs operators in the SMEFT, JHEP03, 180, arXiv:2309.15922 [hep-ph]. 8

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Noumi and J

    T. Noumi and J. Tokuda, Finite energy sum rules for gravitational Regge amplitudes, JHEP06, 032, arXiv:2212.08001 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Snowmass White Paper: UV Constraints on IR Physics,

    C. de Rham, S. Kundu, M. Reece, A. J. Tolley, and S.- Y. Zhou, Snowmass White Paper: UV Constraints on IR Physics, inSnowmass 2021(2022) arXiv:2203.06805 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Hong, Z.-H

    D.-Y. Hong, Z.-H. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhou, On Capped Higgs Positivity Cone (2024) arXiv:2404.04479 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, D. Kosmopoulos, and R. Roiban, Effective Field Theory islands from perturbative and nonperturbative four-graviton amplitudes, JHEP01, 113, arXiv:2205.01655 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    T.Ma, A.Pomarol,andF.Sciotti,Bootstrappingthechi- ral anomaly at large Nc, JHEP11, 176, arXiv:2307.04729 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    De Angelis and G

    S. De Angelis and G. Durieux, EFT matching from an- alyticity and unitarity, SciPost Phys.16, 071 (2024), arXiv:2308.00035 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Acanfora, A

    F. Acanfora, A. Guerrieri, K. Häring, and D. Karateev, Bounds on scattering of neutral Goldstones, JHEP03, 028, arXiv:2310.06027 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    K. Aoki, T. Noumi, R. Saito, S. Sato, S. Shirai, J. Tokuda, and M. Yamazaki, Gravitational positivity for phenomenologists: Dark gauge boson in the swamp- land, Phys. Rev. D110, 016002 (2024), arXiv:2305.10058 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Xu, D.-Y

    H. Xu, D.-Y. Hong, Z.-H. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Positiv- ity bounds on parity-violating scalar-tensor EFTs, JCAP 01, 102, arXiv:2410.09794 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Elias Miro, A

    J. Elias Miro, A. L. Guerrieri, and M. A. Gumus, Ex- tremalHiggscouplings,Phys.Rev.D110,016007(2024), arXiv:2311.09283 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    McPeak, M

    B. McPeak, M. Venuti, and A. Vichi, Adding subtrac- tions: comparingtheimpactofdifferentReggebehaviors, (2023), arXiv:2310.06888 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Riembau, Full Unitarity and the Moments of Scatter- ing Amplitudes, (2022), arXiv:2212.14056 [hep-th]

    M. Riembau, Full Unitarity and the Moments of Scatter- ing Amplitudes, (2022), arXiv:2212.14056 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Caron-Huot and J

    S. Caron-Huot and J. Tokuda, String loops and gravi- tational positivity bounds: imprint of light particles at high energies, JHEP11, 055, arXiv:2406.07606 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Caron-Huot and Y.-Z

    S. Caron-Huot and Y.-Z. Li, Gravity and a universal cut- off for field theory, (2024), arXiv:2408.06440 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Wan and S.-Y

    S.-L. Wan and S.-Y. Zhou, Matrix moment approach to positivity bounds and UV reconstruction from IR, (2024), arXiv:2411.11964 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Buoninfante, L.-Q

    L. Buoninfante, L.-Q. Shao, and A. Tokareva, Non-local positivity bounds: islands in Terra Incognita, (2024), arXiv:2412.08634 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Berman and N

    J. Berman and N. Geiser, Analytic bootstrap bounds on masses and spins in gravitational and non-gravitational scalar theories, (2024), arXiv:2412.17902 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    de Rham, A

    C. de Rham, A. J. Tolley, Z.-H. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Primal S-matrix bootstrap with dispersion relations, (2025), arXiv:2506.22546 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Berman, H

    J. Berman, H. Elvang, and C. Figueiredo, Splitting Re- gions and Shrinking Islands from Higher Point Con- straints, (2025), arXiv:2506.22538 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    The String Landscape, Black Holes and Gravity as the Weakest Force

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis, and C. Vafa, The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force, JHEP06, 060, arXiv:hep-th/0601001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    C.Cheung, J.Liu,andG.N.Remmen,ProofoftheWeak Gravity Conjecture from Black Hole Entropy, JHEP10, 004, arXiv:1801.08546 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    G. Shiu, P. Soler, and W. Cottrell, Weak Gravity Con- jecture and extremal black holes, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.62, 110412 (2019), arXiv:1611.06270 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture and the Axionic Black Hole Paradox

    A. Hebecker and P. Soler, The Weak Gravity Conjec- ture and the Axionic Black Hole Paradox, JHEP09, 036, arXiv:1702.06130 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Y. Abe, T. Noumi, and K. Yoshimura, Black hole ex- tremality in nonlinear electrodynamics: a lesson for weak gravity and Festina Lente bounds, JHEP09, 024, arXiv:2305.17062 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    De Luca, J

    V. De Luca, J. Khoury, and S. S. C. Wong, Implica- tions of the weak gravity conjecture for tidal Love num- bers of black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 044066 (2023), arXiv:2211.14325 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Barbosa, P

    S. Barbosa, P. Brax, S. Fichet, and L. de Souza, Running Love Numbers and the Effective Field Theory of Gravity, (2025), arXiv:2501.18684 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Q.-H. Cao, N. Kan, and D. Ueda, Effective field theory in light of relative entropy, JHEP07, 111, arXiv:2211.08065 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  65. [65]

    Cao and D

    Q.-H. Cao and D. Ueda, Entropy constraints on ef- fective field theory, Phys. Rev. D108, 025011 (2023), arXiv:2201.00931 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Aalsma, A

    L. Aalsma, A. Cole, and G. Shiu, Weak Gravity Conjec- ture, BlackHoleEntropy, and ModularInvariance,JHEP 08, 022, arXiv:1905.06956 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1905

  67. [67]

    Hamada, T

    Y. Hamada, T. Noumi, and G. Shiu, Weak Gravity Con- jecture from Unitarity and Causality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 051601 (2019), arXiv:1810.03637 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    Araki and E

    H. Araki and E. H. Lieb, Entropy inequalities, Commun. Math. Phys.18, 160 (1970)

    work page 1970

  69. [69]

    Witten, A Mini-Introduction To Information Theory, Riv

    E. Witten, A Mini-Introduction To Information Theory, Riv. Nuovo Cim.43, 187 (2020), arXiv:1805.11965 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    Laine and A

    M. Laine and A. Vuorinen,Basics of Thermal Field The- ory, Vol. 925 (Springer, 2016) arXiv:1701.01554 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  71. [71]

    Matsubara, A New approach to quantum statistical mechanics, Prog

    T. Matsubara, A New approach to quantum statistical mechanics, Prog. Theor. Phys.14, 351 (1955)

    work page 1955

  72. [72]

    Fernández-Sarmiento, R

    L. Fernández-Sarmiento, R. Penco, and R. A. Rosen, On Entropy Bounds for Irrelevant Operators, (2025), arXiv:2508.14978 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025