Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Gauge Theory and Integrability: An Overview

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that perturbative four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory produces the Yang-Baxter equation and the Yangian algebra as outputs, explaining integrable models from gauge theory rather than imposing their defining equations by ha

desk verdict A clear, honest overview of the 4d Chern-Simons/integrability program; the key two-loop step is asserted rather than shown, and the abstract is slightly stronger than the body. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07628 v1 pith:77D3YHZJ submitted 2025-09-09 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MPmath.QA

Masahito Yamazaki This is my paper
classification hep-thcond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MPmath.QA MSC 81T1381R1217B3781T45 PACS 11.15.-q02.30.Ik
keywords four-dimensionalChern-SimonstheoryYang-BaxterequationYangianintegrablemodelsperturbativequantumfieldWilsonlinesR-matrixaffineYangians
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey argues that the defining structures of integrable models—the Yang-Baxter equation and the Yangian algebra—can be derived from the perturbative expansion of a four-dimensional gauge theory, the four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory. The core move is to treat the spectral parameter of an integrable model as a geometric coordinate rather than an auxiliary variable. Then the Yang-Baxter equation follows from topological invariance of Wilson lines in two directions, and the quantum-corrected Yangian relation follows from a specific two-loop Feynman diagram. The paper presents this as a solution to a long-standing problem: explaining integrable models from quantum field theory instead of taking their equations as axioms. It also acknowledges that the direct derivation is established only to second order unless supplemented by the RTT relation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory with action S[A]=12πℏ∫R2x,y×Czdz∧Tr(A∧dA+23A∧A∧A), a partially topological, partially holomorphic gauge theory on a four-manifold whose extra complex direction carries the spectral parameter. The lack of a dz component makes the connection a partial connection, and the choice of integration contour is needed because the action is non-Hermitian. This theory does two jobs: topological invariance in the x,y directions turns Wilson-line crossings into the Yang-Baxter equation, while perturbative quantization around the trivial connection produces, at two loops, the quantum correction that defines the Yangian relation.

What would settle it

Compute the expectation value of three crossing Wilson lines in the four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory at third order in ℏ. If any surviving Feynman diagram adds a nonzero correction beyond the right-hand side of (4.1), the derivation of the Yangian relation fails; if all such diagrams cancel cohomologically, the claim is corroborated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory provides a novel framework in which integrable models are not inputs but outputs. Wilson lines placed on a four-manifold R2x,y×Cz, where z is the spectral parameter, give R-matrices at crossings; because the theory is topological along the x,y directions, the Yang-Baxter equation holds automatically. Quantizing the theory around the trivial connection, the paper traces the Yangian relation (4.1) to gauge invariance of Wilson-line Feynman diagrams: the left-hand side comes from the Jacobi identity of the Lie algebra, and the right-hand side, proportional to ℏ2, comes from the two-loop diagram of F

Load-bearing premise

The whole explanation rests on the assumption that the non-Hermitian four-dimensional Chern-Simons path integral has a well-defined perturbative expansion after choosing a suitable integration contour, so that the two-loop diagram in Fig. 5 indeed yields the right-hand side of (4.1) while all other two-loop diagrams cancel.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation become geometric rather than accidental: they are forced by topological invariance of Wilson lines in a four-dimensional gauge theory.
  • The Yangian relation's right-hand side, which looks like an ad hoc quantum correction, is reinterpreted as a two-loop Feynman-diagram effect, connecting representation-theoretic obstructions such as 248⊕1 to gauge-theoretic consistency.
  • The same gauge-theoretic framework extends to a five-dimensional analog producing affine Yangians, and to quiver Yangians, placing these algebras under a common derivation.
  • The construction yields infinitely many new two-dimensional classically integrable quantum field theories, suggesting that the QFT route is generative, not just explanatory.
  • The paper's broader lesson is that perturbative quantum field theory, even without a fully rigorous nonperturbative formulation, can produce nontrivial mathematics such as the Yangian and its relatives.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: If the framework is right, a rigorous mathematical proof of the Yangian relations would reduce to a theorem about the perturbative renormalization of non-Hermitian holomorphic gauge theories, including a proof that the chosen integration contour makes the path integral well defined.
  • Editorial extension: The same logic suggests that other 'auxiliary' parameters of integrable systems—twist variables, elliptic moduli, or root-of-unity phases—could be promoted to extra geometric directions in higher-dimensional Chern-Simons theories; the paper mentions such generalizations but does not develop them.
  • Editorial extension: A concrete testable extension is to apply the two-loop computation to elliptic or root-of-unity R-matrices, where the classical rational/trigonometric/elliptic classification logic fails, and see whether the QFT derivation reproduces the known quantum R-matrices or predicts new ones.
  • Editorial extension: The framing anomaly mentioned in the paper indicates that the ℏ-dependent shifts of spectral parameters seen in integrable models may be the same phenomenon as the framing dependence of Chern-Simons theory; making that identification explicit would strengthen the unification.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This article is a non-technical overview of recent work (mainly by Costello, Witten, and the author) that aims to explain integrable models from four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory. It begins by contrasting Witten's 3d Chern-Simons construction of knot invariants with the Yang-Baxter equation, introduces the Yangian and the defining relation (4.1), then describes the 4d action (5.1) and the geometrical role of the spectral parameter. The paper argues that the YBE follows from topological invariance in two dimensions, and sketches how a two-loop Feynman diagram (Fig. 5) produces the RHS of (4.1), with other two-loop diagrams handled by cohomological arguments. It explicitly notes that the derivation is valid only to second order, with all-orders control deferred to the RTT relation in [5].

Significance. If the underlying program is correct, it is conceptually significant: it derives the Yang-Baxter equation and the Yangian relation from a QFT rather than imposing them by hand, and connects integrable models to knot theory through Chern-Simons theory. This overview is a readable bridge for non-experts and is honest about the second-order limitation of the perturbative argument. It does not contain new technical results, but as a review it is a useful introduction to a substantial body of work. The explicit admission that the all-orders statement relies on [5] and that the cohomological cancellation is not displayed is a strength in transparency but creates a mismatch with the abstract's 'solved' claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §6] The abstract states that the problem 'was solved' by perturbative 4d Chern-Simons theory. However, the body's derivation of the Yangian relation (4.1) is explicitly limited to second order: §6 says the two-loop diagram of Fig. 5 'generates precisely the right-hand side of (4.1)', but then immediately states that 'many other two-loop Feynman diagrams ... must be accounted for by cohomological arguments' without displaying the cancellation or citing the precise location in [4,5]. The all-orders statement is deferred to the RTT relation in [5]. For a review, this is acceptable if the citations are made precise; but as written, the abstract overstates what is demonstrated in this paper. Please either add a concrete pointer to the relevant equations/sections of [4,5] for the cohomological argument and the RTT derivation, or soften the abstract to say 'solved to second order, with all orders a
  2. [§5, paragraph on the YBE] The claim that the YBE 'follows immediately' from topological invariance is too quick. The YBE is an equality of products of R-matrices acting on a three-fold tensor product, with spectral parameters; topological invariance alone does not fix the form of the R-matrix or its spectral-parameter dependence. The later statement in §6 that R-matrices can be reproduced by perturbative computations is supported only by a reference to [4,5]. For an overview this is acceptable if explicitly flagged, but the word 'immediately' overstates the amount of work involved. Please add a sentence explaining that the actual computation of the R-matrix is carried out in [4,5] and that topology provides the consistency, not the full solution.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Footnote 18, §5] The non-Hermiticity of action (5.1) and the need for a special integration contour is a central subtlety for the perturbative expansion. It is consigned to a footnote with a citation to [23]. I recommend promoting this caveat to the main text, even if briefly, since the paper is aimed at non-experts.
  2. [§6, p. 10] The 'RTT relation' is invoked as the all-orders substitute, but no equation or definition is given. For a non-expert reader, a short statement of this relation (or a pointer to the precise equation in [5]) would make the argument comprehensible.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption, p. 9] The caption says 'others must be accounted for by cohomological arguments' but does not indicate where (in [4] or [5]) this is done. Please add a specific reference so the reader can check.
  4. [Eq. (4.1) and Eq. (6.1)] In (4.1), the symmetrization notation has a trailing comma and the use of {t_d,t_e,t_f} is slightly confusing; consider clarifying. In (6.1), the representation \hat{R} is not defined; it should be specified as the induced representation of U(g[[z-z_0]]) on R.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the 4d Chern-Simons derivation is argued from the action and Wilson lines, with honest second-order limitation; self-citations are not load-bearing circularity.

full rationale

The paper is an overview of the author's prior work with Costello and Witten [4,5]. The YBE is argued from the topological invariance of (5.1) along the R^2_{x,y} directions (Section 5: 'this follows immediately in our setup since the theory is topological along the two-dimensional plane'). The Yangian relation (4.1) is claimed to follow from a two-loop Feynman diagram (Fig. 5, Section 6). Neither the Yangian nor the R-matrix appears as input in the action (5.1); the Wilson line (6.1) uses U(g[[z]]), which is the ℏ→0 classical limit, not the full Yangian. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The two-loop computation is deferred to [4,5], which are self-citations, but those papers derive the result from the same QFT rather than assuming (4.1); thus the citation is evidence, not circularity. The paper explicitly limits the derivation to second order and defers the all-orders proof to the RTT relation, also justified within the same framework (Section 6: 'Note that this argument is valid only up to the second order in the perturbative expansion... To derive the Yangian relation to all orders in perturbation theory one can appeal to the RTT relation, a variant of the YBE. This relation can also be justified within the four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory [5].'). This is a limitation in rigor/completeness, not an equivalence-by-construction. No circular step was identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters or invented entities. It relies on several domain assumptions about the 4d Chern-Simons framework and the correctness of prior computations by the author and collaborators.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The perturbative expansion of four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory is well-defined and the path integral converges with an appropriate integration contour.
    Section 5, footnote 18 states the action is non-Hermitian and a contour must be chosen; the paper relies on prior work (e.g., [4,5]) for the existence of such a contour.
  • domain assumption The two-loop Feynman diagram computation reproduces the right-hand side of the Yangian relation (4.1).
    Section 6 states this without showing the computation, citing [4,5] for the explicit result.
  • domain assumption The theory is topological along R^2 and holomorphic along C, so Wilson line correlation functions are invariant under moves that implement the YBE.
    Section 5, after equation (5.1), asserts this topological-holomorphic structure without further proof.
  • domain assumption The classification of classical YBE solutions into rational, trigonometric, and elliptic classes carries over to the quantum R-matrices needed here.
    Footnote 10 notes this logic does not apply to some integrable R-matrices, indicating a known limitation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gauge Theory and Integrability: An Overview." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/77D3YHZJ

@misc{pith2026250907628,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gauge Theory and Integrability: An Overview},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/77D3YHZJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07628}
}
read the original abstract

While general quantum field theories (QFTs) have yet to be rigorously defined in mathematics, they have generated new mathematics and have served as a unifying principle connecting different branches of the subject. In 1989, Witten made a profound impact on the mathematical community by systematically constructing knot invariants via the three-dimensional Chern-Simons theory. One of the historical roots of knot invariants was integrable models, whose explanation in terms of QFT remained unsolved for decades. Recently, this problem was solved by a perturbative analysis of the four-dimensional Chern-Simons theory, which provides a novel framework for understanding and unifying many different aspects of integrable models. In this article, we summarize the basic aspects of these developments for non-experts in both physics and mathematics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07628 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An example of the isotopy of a knot. This is the so-called Reid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Graphical representation of the YBE. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Graphical representation of the R-matrix. The YBE is one of the fundamental characterizations of integrable models, and its solution defines an integrable lattice model, in which the number of in￾dependent conserved charges equals the number of degrees of freedom. In this paradigm the classification of integrable models reduces to the classification of the solutions of the YBE. The YBE is a highly over-constrained e… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: That the gauge field takes values in a Lie algebra follows from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The key Feynman diagram that gives rise to the right-hand [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Time-Dependent Integrability from Gauge Theory, I

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.5 of 10

    Spacetime-dependent 4d Chern-Simons theory generates time-dependent integrable field theories whose allowed time dependence coincides with one-loop RG flow while preserving Lax integrability.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [5]

    Gauge theory and integ rability, II,

    K. Costello, E. Witten, and M. Yamazaki, “Gauge theory and integ rability, II,” ICCM Not. 6 no. 1, (2018) 120–146. https://doi.org/10.4310/ICCM.2018.v6.n1.a7

    work page doi:10.4310/iccm.2018.v6.n1.a7 2018

  2. [1]

    Costello, Renormalization and effective field theory , vol

    K. Costello, Renormalization and effective field theory , vol. 170 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1090/surv/170

    doi:10.1090/surv/170 2011

  3. [2]

    Costello and O

    K. Costello and O. Gwilliam, Factorization algebras in quantum field theory. Vol. 1 , vol. 31 of New 23See e.g. [38] for more general setups. 12 Masahito Yamazaki Mathematical Monographs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678626

    doi:10.1017/9781316678626 2017

  4. [3]

    Costello and O

    K. Costello and O. Gwilliam, Factorization algebras in quantum field theory. Vol. 2 , vol. 41 of New Mathematical Monographs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678664

    doi:10.1017/9781316678664 2021

  5. [4]

    Gauge theory and integ rability, I,

    K. Costello, E. Witten, and M. Yamazaki, “Gauge theory and integ rability, I,” ICCM Not. 6 no. 1, (2018) 46–119. https://doi.org/10.4310/ICCM.2018.v6.n1.a6

    doi:10.4310/iccm.2018.v6.n1.a6 2018

  6. [6]

    Integrable Lattice Models From Gauge Theory

    E. Witten, “Integrable Lattice Models From Gauge Theory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 21 (2017) 1819–1843, arXiv:1611.00592 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial,

    E. Witten, “Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial,” Comm. Math. Phys. 121 no. 3, (1989) 351–399. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1104178138

    work page arXiv 1989

  8. [8]

    A polynomial invariant for knots via von Neumann algebras,

    V. F. R. Jones, “A polynomial invariant for knots via von Neumann algebras,” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 12 no. 1, (1985) 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-1985-15304-2

    doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-1985-15304-2 1985

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Hecke algebra representations of braid group s and link polynomials,

    V. F. R. Jones, “Hecke algebra representations of braid group s and link polynomials,” Ann. of Math. (2) 126 no. 2, (1987) 335–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/1971403

    1987 doi

  2. [10]

    On framings of 3-manifolds,

    M. Atiyah, “On framings of 3-manifolds,” Topology 29 no. 1, (1990) 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-9383(90)90021-B

    1990 doi

  3. [11]

    Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups,

    N. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev, “Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups,” Invent. Math. 103 no. 3, (1991) 547–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01239527

    1991 doi

  4. [12]

    Exactly solvable models a nd knot theory,

    M. Wadati, T. Deguchi, and Y. Akutsu, “Exactly solvable models a nd knot theory,” Phys. Rep. 180 no. 4-5, (1989) 247–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(89)90123-3

    1989 doi

  5. [13]

    Some exact results for the many-body problem in o ne dimension with repulsive delta-function interaction,

    C. N. Yang, “Some exact results for the many-body problem in o ne dimension with repulsive delta-function interaction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1312–1315. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1312

    1967 doi

  6. [14]

    Partition function of the eight-vertex lattice m odel,

    R. J. Baxter, “Partition function of the eight-vertex lattice m odel,” Ann. Physics 70 (1972) 193–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(72)90335-1

    1972 doi

  7. [15]

    All Possible Symmetries of the S Ma trix,

    S. R. Coleman and J. Mandula, “All Possible Symmetries of the S Ma trix,” Phys. Rev. 159 (1967) 1251–1256

    1967

  8. [16]

    Quantum computing 40 years later,

    J. Preskill, “Quantum computing 40 years later,” arXiv:2106.10522 [quant-ph]

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Solutions of the classical Yang-Baxter equation for simple Lie algebras,

    A. A. Belavin and V. G. Drinfel ′ d, “Solutions of the classical Yang-Baxter equation for simple Lie algebras,” Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 16 no. 3, Gauge Theory and Integrability: An Overview 13 (1982) 1–29, 96

    1982

  10. [18]

    Hopf algebras and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation,

    V. G. Drinfel ′ d, “Hopf algebras and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 283 no. 5, (1985) 1060–1064

    1985

  11. [19]

    A new realization of Yangians and of quantum affine algebras,

    V. G. Drinfel ′ d, “A new realization of Yangians and of quantum affine algebras,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 296 no. 1, (1987) 13–17

    1987

  12. [20]

    Chari and A

    V. Chari and A. Pressley, A guide to quantum groups . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994

    1994

  13. [21]

    Fundamental representations of Yangians and singularities of R-matrices,

    V. Chari and A. Pressley, “Fundamental representations of Yangians and singularities of R-matrices,” J. Reine Angew. Math. 417 (1991) 87–128

    1991

  14. [22]

    Supersymmetric gauge theory and the Yangian,

    K. Costello, “Supersymmetric gauge theory and the Yangian,” arXiv:1303.2632 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Branes and categor ifying integrable lattice models,

    M. Ashwinkumar, M.-C. Tan, and Q. Zhao, “Branes and categor ifying integrable lattice models,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 24 no. 1, (2020) 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4310/atmp.2020.v24.n1.a1

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    Analytic continuation of Chern-Simons theory,

    E. Witten, “Analytic continuation of Chern-Simons theory,” in Chern-Simons gauge theory: 20 years after , vol. 50 of AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math., pp. 347–446. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1090/amsip/050/19

    2011 doi

  17. [25]

    Electric-magnetic duality and the ge ometric Langlands program,

    A. Kapustin and E. Witten, “Electric-magnetic duality and the ge ometric Langlands program,” Commun. Number Theory Phys. 1 no. 1, (2007) 1–236. https://doi.org/10.4310/CNTP.2007.v1.n1.a1

    2007 doi

  18. [26]

    New T-duality for Chern-Simons theory,

    M. Yamazaki, “New T-duality for Chern-Simons theory,” J. High Energy Phys. no. 12, (2019) 090, 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep12(2019)090

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    Mirror symmetry is T -duality,

    A. Strominger, S.-T. Yau, and E. Zaslow, “Mirror symmetry is T -duality,” Nuclear Phys. B 479 no. 1-2, (1996) 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(96)00434-8

    1996 doi

  20. [28]

    Homological mirror symmetry for tor ic orbifolds of toric del Pezzo surfaces,

    K. Ueda and M. Yamazaki, “Homological mirror symmetry for tor ic orbifolds of toric del Pezzo surfaces,” J. Reine Angew. Math. 680 (2013) 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/crelle.2012.031

    2013 doi

  21. [29]

    Brane tilings and their applications,

    M. Yamazaki, “Brane tilings and their applications,” Fortschr. Phys. 56 no. 6, (2008) 555–686. https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.200810536

    2008 doi

  22. [30]

    Chern-Simons perturbation theo ry,

    S. Axelrod and I. M. Singer, “Chern-Simons perturbation theo ry,” in Proceedings of the XXth International Conference on Differe ntial Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 1, 2 (New York, 1991) , pp. 3–45. World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 1992

    1991

  23. [31]

    Feynman diagrams and low-dimensional topolog y,

    M. Kontsevich, “Feynman diagrams and low-dimensional topolog y,” in First European Congress of Mathematics, Vol. II (Paris, 1992) , vol. 120 of Progr. Math., pp. 97–121. Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 1994

    1992

  24. [32]

    Gauge Theory And Integrability, I II,

    K. Costello and M. Yamazaki, “Gauge Theory And Integrability, I II,” arXiv:1908.02289 [hep-th]

    1908 arXiv

  25. [33]

    On integrable field theories as dihedral affine Gaudin m odels,

    B. Vicedo, “On integrable field theories as dihedral affine Gaudin m odels,” Int. Math. Res. Not. 2020 no. 15, (2020) 4513–4601, 14 Masahito Yamazaki arXiv:1701.04856 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [34]

    M-theory in the Omega-background and 5-dimens ional non-commutative gauge theory,

    K. Costello, “M-theory in the Omega-background and 5-dimens ional non-commutative gauge theory,” arXiv:1610.04144 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Feynman diagrams and Ω-deformed M-theo ry,

    J. Oh and Y. Zhou, “Feynman diagrams and Ω-deformed M-theo ry,” SciPost Phys. 10 no. 2, (2021) Paper No. 029, 51. https://doi.org/10.21468/scipostphys.10.2.029

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    Quiver Yangian from crystal melting,

    W. Li and M. Yamazaki, “Quiver Yangian from crystal melting,” J. High Energy Phys. no. 11, (2020) 035, 124. https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep11(2020)035

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    Quiver Yangians and crystal meltings: A concise s ummary,

    M. Yamazaki, “Quiver Yangians and crystal meltings: A concise s ummary,” J. Math. Phys. 64 no. 1, (2023) Paper No. 011101, 7. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0089785

    2023 doi

  30. [38]

    Quantization of topological-holomorphic field theories: local aspects,

    O. Gwilliam, E. Rabinovich, and B. R. Williams, “Quantization of topological-holomorphic field theories: local aspects,” arXiv:2107.06734 [math-ph]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Higher Kac-Moody a lgebras and moduli spaces of G-bundles,

    G. Faonte, B. Hennion, and M. Kapranov, “Higher Kac-Moody a lgebras and moduli spaces of G-bundles,” Adv. Math. 346 (2019) 389–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2019.01.040

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Higher Kac-Moody algebras and symmetries of holomorphic field theories,

    O. Gwilliam and B. R. Williams, “Higher Kac-Moody algebras and symmetries of holomorphic field theories,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 25 no. 1, (2021) 129–239. https://doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.2021.v25.n1.a4

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    Four -dimensional avatars of two-dimensional RCFT,

    A. Losev, G. W. Moore, N. Nekrasov, and S. Shatashvili, “Four -dimensional avatars of two-dimensional RCFT,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 46 (1996) 130–145, arXiv:hep-th/9509151

    1996 arXiv

  34. [42]

    L. J. Mason and N. M. J. Woodhouse, Integrability, self-duality, and twistor theory, vol. 15 of London Mathematical Society Monographs. New Series . The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996. O xford Science Publications

    1996

  35. [43]

    Topological strings, twistors, and Skyrmions,

    K. Costello, “Topological strings, twistors, and Skyrmions,”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlDNpPHvA8A&ab_channel=WHCGP

  36. [44]

    Twistors, the ASD Yang-Mills equa tions, and 4d Chern-Simons theory,

    R. Bittleston and D. Skinner, “Twistors, the ASD Yang-Mills equa tions, and 4d Chern-Simons theory,” arXiv:2011.04638 [hep-th] . a) Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. b) Trans-Scale Quantum Science Institute, University of To kyo, H...

    2011 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.