Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 35 references

An Interval Type-2 Version of Bayes Theorem Derived from Interval Probability Range Estimates Provided by Subject Matter Experts

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper builds an interval type-2 version of Bayes' theorem and an SME-interval encoder that feeds it.

desk verdict A coherent, genuinely new method for turning SME interval estimates into IT2 Bayes posteriors, but the WPM exponent r is uncalibrated and the overlap repair is an untested heuristic, so the central pipeline lacks validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.08834 v1 pith:PWAXZKR5 submitted 2025-08-29 cs.AI physics.comp-phphysics.data-anq-fin.CP

John T. Rickard , William A. Dembski , James Rickards This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AIphysics.comp-phphysics.data-anq-fin.CP
keywords Bayestheoremintervaltype-2fuzzysetsmembershipfunctionsynthesissubjectmatterexpertelicitationalpha-cutsarithmeticcomputingwithwordsuncertaintyquantification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Bayes' theorem usually needs precise probabilities, but real experts often can only give ranges. This paper argues that those ranges can be encoded as interval type-2 fuzzy membership functions and that Bayes' rule can then be run on the fuzzy sets themselves, producing an interval-valued posterior. The key mathematical fix is a conservative replacement rule that prevents the denominator from overlapping the numerator in a way that would push posterior probabilities above one. A second contribution is an algorithm that turns subject-matter-expert interval estimates into tailored IT2 membership functions, including cases with unbounded or negative values. If the construction is sound, it gives a complete pipeline from expert interval guesses to a usable fuzzy posterior.

What carries the argument

The machinery has two parts. First, alpha-cut interval arithmetic on the upper and lower membership functions of the three input IT2 fuzzy sets: each alpha level gives intervals for numerator and denominator, and Bayes' formula is applied to those intervals, with the replacement rule (3) correcting any denominator cut that would otherwise overlap the numerator cut and drive posterior values above one. Second, the SME encoding algorithm: given n interval estimates, it finds their overlap, classifies the FOU (left/right shoulder, interior, and the new left/right/interior droop variants), removes the overlap to form reduced interval sets, and aggregates endpoints with a weighted power mean. The

What would settle it

Take a concrete case where the numerator and denominator FOUs overlap, enumerate many point triples (P(E|H), P(H), P(E)) lying inside the SME intervals and satisfying inequality (2), compute their ordinary Bayesian posteriors, and check whether the paper's posterior FOU contains the distribution of those posteriors at every alpha level. If any such posterior falls outside the constructed FOU, the replacement rule is not conservative as claimed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Bayes' theorem can be generalized so P(E|H), P(H), and P(E) are interval type-2 fuzzy membership functions instead of precise numbers, and P(H|E) is again an IT2 membership function. Working on alpha-cuts of the upper and lower membership functions, the paper spots a failure mode: if the denominator P(E) cuts overlap the numerator-product cuts, naive interval division yields posterior cuts exceeding one. Its remedy, equation (3), replaces the offending P(E) cut with the widest interval still consistent with P(E) ≥ P(E|H)P(H), keeping every posterior value in [0,1]. A companion encoder converts SME interval ranges into such membership functions, classifying the FOU as shoulder, interior, or d

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the weighted power mean exponent r (chosen as 10 in the examples) correctly captures the level of secondary imprecision in the SME interval estimates; the paper offers no independent calibration for r, so if r is arbitrary the constructed input membership functions—and the resulting posterior fuzzy set—are arbitrary.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bayesian updating no longer requires precise priors and likelihoods; any domain where experts can state ranges can feed the same pipeline.
  • The resulting posterior is an IT2 FOU, which can be displayed as a band of uncertainty and reduced to a scalar or interval via centroid-type reduction.
  • The encoding algorithm extends previous word-based IT2 construction to quantities with unbounded domains, negative values, or boundary-touching intervals, so it covers odds, production figures, discount rates, and similar expert inputs.
  • When expert intervals are mutually inconsistent (denominator overlapping the numerator product), the replacement rule (3) guarantees the posterior membership values never exceed one.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond Bayes, the same conservative denominator adjustment applies to any ratio of interval-valued quantities, such as likelihood ratios, odds, or hazard rates; the overlap-repair logic is generic.
  • The freedom in the WPM exponent r is both a feature and an open degree of freedom: one could calibrate r so that the constructed FOU's coverage of future observations matches its nominal imprecision, a test the paper does not perform.
  • The droop FOU classes are likely useful for aggregating expert forecasts where many estimates touch a boundary (0 or 1 for probabilities, 100 in odds), even outside the Bayesian setting.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an interval type-2 (IT2) fuzzy extension of Bayes' theorem. Given IT2 membership functions for P(E|H), P(H), and P(E), it computes alpha-cut intervals for the posterior P(H|E) by interval arithmetic, with a repair rule (Eq. 3) intended to handle cases where the denominator P(E) alpha-cuts overlap the numerator alpha-cuts, thereby avoiding posterior intervals that exceed unity. The second contribution is an algorithm for synthesizing IT2 membership functions from interval estimates provided by subject matter experts, based on weighted power means (WPM), with support for left/right shoulder, interior, and 'droop' FOUs over bounded or unbounded domains. The paper illustrates both contributions with examples using synthetic SME data and arbitrary choices of the WPM exponent r.

Significance. If the method is valid, it provides a complete pipeline from SME interval judgments to an IT2 posterior, which would be useful in applications where precise Bayesian inputs are unavailable. The repair rule addresses a genuine technical problem in fuzzy Bayesian computation, and the synthesis algorithm generalizes earlier interval-to-word encoding methods to arbitrary physical/technical quantities, including unbounded domains and negative intervals. The droop-FOU construction and the explicit handling of intervals touching natural bounds are useful extensions. The paper is clearly written in its main structure and the examples are reproducible from the supplied interval data. However, the central claim that the resulting IT2 posterior is 'derived from' the SME interval data is weakened by the arbitrary choice of the WPM exponent r, which controls the FOU tail widths and hence materially affects the output.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III.B, Eqs. (11), (15), (16), (20); Section IV] The WPM exponent r is a free parameter that controls the width of the UMF/LMF tails. The paper sets r=10 for all examples and calls this 'arbitrary,' and Eq. (40) is only a 'suggested' data-dependent value that is not used in the examples. Since the FOU width varies continuously from a type-1 MF at r=1 to the maximal-width FOU as r→∞, the constructed input IT2 MFs for P(E|H), P(H), and P(E) are not determined by the SME interval data alone. The posterior IT2 MF inherits this indeterminacy. This is a load-bearing gap: the paper's title and abstract claim that the result is 'derived from interval probability range estimates,' but the derivation depends on an uncalibrated subjective parameter. The authors should either provide a principled, data-driven rule for choosing r (with justification), or explicitly reframe the method as producing a family of outputs parameterized by r and provide a
  2. [Section II, Eq. (3)] The overlap repair rule is asserted to be 'conservative' and to produce a feasible and intuitive IT2 MF for P(H|E), but no proof is given that the adjusted alpha-cut family is a valid IT2 MF. In particular, the authors do not show that the repaired alpha-cuts are nested across alpha, that the resulting UMF is pointwise above the LMF, or that the support is contained in [0,1]. They also do not define in what formal sense the replacement is 'conservative' (e.g., minimal relative to some loss function). Since the validity of the method's output depends on these properties, a precise statement and proof, or at least a rigorous argument, is needed. This is especially important because the repaired denominator cuts are then used in interval division, and any violation of nesting or ordering would make the resulting FOU ill-defined.
  3. [Section II, Eqs. (1)-(4)] The interval division step is only valid when the denominator alpha-cuts do not contain zero. The paper does not discuss this case, even though the synthesis algorithm in Section III explicitly allows SME intervals with left endpoint 0 (e.g., the leftdroop and indroop examples). If a P(E) alpha-cut includes 0, the quotient interval [l_numerator/r_denominator, r_numerator/l_denominator] is undefined or unbounded. The overlap repair in Eq. (3) does not address zero denominators. The authors should state the required condition P(E)>0, describe how to handle SME intervals that include zero, or prove that the construction avoids this case for probability inputs.
minor comments (6)
  1. [General notation] The notation in Eqs. (3), (11), (15), (16), (20), and (40) is difficult to parse due to ambiguous subscripts (e.g., PE vs. E, lambda vs. r). Please define every symbol explicitly in one place and use a consistent notation for left and right alpha-cut endpoints.
  2. [Section II] The paper calls the construction an 'IT2 version of Bayes' Theorem,' but no formal theorem statement or proof is provided. The content is an algorithm with an illustrative example. Consider either stating and proving a theorem in the conventional sense or softening the terminology to 'procedure' or 'method.'
  3. [Eq. (40)] Equation (40) is only described in prose and is not used in any example. Its behavior as a function of the interval set is not analyzed (e.g., monotonicity, sensitivity to outliers). If it is intended as a default rule, it should be evaluated on the paper's examples.
  4. [Section III.A, Algorithm 1] The algorithm description is informal and the notation mixes natural-language conditions with pseudocode. In particular, the condition 'if (a^{(i)} > -infinity) AND (a^{(i)} == x_lower)' is not written cleanly. A more standard pseudocode format would improve readability.
  5. [Section IV, Fig. 11-12] The text says the FOUs in Fig. 12 have 'very narrow tails due to the closeness of the input odds intervals,' but the figure itself is small and the caption does not explain the green/orange distinction clearly. Please enlarge figures and include explicit captions.
  6. [References] Some references have formatting inconsistencies (e.g., [26] contains a DOI that appears to belong to a different article; [13] lacks complete author names). Please check all reference metadata.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the IT2 Bayes computation is an explicit arithmetic recipe from stated inputs, and the free WPM exponent is an acknowledged modeling choice rather than a hidden reuse of the output.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the sense that its outputs are computed from explicitly stated inputs via constructive formulas. Section II defines the IT2 Bayes operation as alpha-cut interval arithmetic with a replacement rule (equation 3) for denominator/numerator overlaps; this is a rule for combining given IT2 MFs, and the resulting P(H|E) FOU is a direct function of those inputs. No equation or definition secretly presupposes the posterior P(H|E). Section III's encoding algorithm is also constructive: SME intervals are converted into trapezoidal IT2 MFs via weighted power means, and the WPM exponent r is explicitly flagged as a free parameter. The paper states in Section IV, 'we select an arbitrary choice of r=10 for the value of the WPM exponent for purposes of illustration, whereas in practice, we might use the value suggested by (40) above.' Thus the dependence of the posterior on r is acknowledged, not disguised as a prediction. The suggested consistency-based formula (40) is a heuristic for setting a parameter, not a fit of the target quantity. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain: references to prior interval-encoding work are background, and the cited Karnik-Mendel algorithm is only used for type reduction of the final FOU. The absence of external validation or calibration of r is a legitimate correctness/validation concern, but it is not circularity under the stated criteria. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The construction relies on unproved validity of alpha-cut interval arithmetic, an ad hoc overlap repair, an arbitrary WPM exponent r, and face-value trust in expert intervals. There are no invented physical entities. The free parameters make the output depend on designer choices.

free parameters (3)
  • WPM tail exponent r = r=10 in examples; eq. (40) suggests a data-dependent value
    Controls the widths of the UMF and LMF tails, hence the entire FOU and the posterior uncertainty. Not derived from external data or theory.
  • Droop LMF intercept exponents r0 and r1 = r0=r1=1 in examples
    Equations (26) and (27) set the LMF intercept heights on the vertical axes; the paper says the choice is 'entirely at the designer's choice'.
  • Single-SME synthetic interval count and distribution = unspecified
    In the single-SME case, the paper says to generate 'multiple uniform random pairs' drawn from two intervals, without specifying how many or how the two intervals are interpreted.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption SME interval estimates are taken at face value and are mutually meaningful
    Section III.A says the method 'dispenses entirely with data cleaning' and takes SME inputs at face value; this is a trust assumption about expert reliability.
  • domain assumption Interval arithmetic on alpha-cuts of IT2 MFs yields a valid IT2 MF
    Section II propagates alpha-cuts through product and division without proving that the resulting intervals are nested, normal, or convex.
  • ad hoc to paper The overlap repair in equation (3) is conservative and produces feasible probabilities
    The replacement [max(l_E,l_N), max(r_E,r_N)] is introduced as a strategy, not derived from Bayesian or fuzzy principles, and it forces posterior alpha-cuts to reach 1.
  • standard math The inequality P(E) >= P(E|H)P(H) holds for any probability measure
    Equation (2) follows from the law of total probability and is correct for a well-defined joint distribution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Interval Type-2 Version of Bayes Theorem Derived from Interval Probability Range Estimates Provided by Subject Matter Experts." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PWAXZKR5

@misc{pith2026250908834,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Interval Type-2 Version of Bayes Theorem Derived from Interval Probability Range Estimates Provided by Subject Matter Experts},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PWAXZKR5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08834}
}
read the original abstract

Bayesian inference is widely used in many different fields to test hypotheses against observations. In most such applications, an assumption is made of precise input values to produce a precise output value. However, this is unrealistic for real-world applications. Often the best available information from subject matter experts (SMEs) in a given field is interval range estimates of the input probabilities involved in Bayes Theorem. This paper provides two key contributions to extend Bayes Theorem to an interval type-2 (IT2) version. First, we develop an IT2 version of Bayes Theorem that uses a novel and conservative method to avoid potential inconsistencies in the input IT2 MFs that otherwise might produce invalid output results. We then describe a novel and flexible algorithm for encoding SME-provided intervals into IT2 fuzzy membership functions (MFs), which we can use to specify the input probabilities in Bayes Theorem. Our algorithm generalizes and extends previous work on this problem that primarily addressed the encoding of intervals into word MFs for Computing with Words applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08834 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Input IT2 MFs for the second example. The resulting IT2 MF for PH E   | is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. IT2 MF of PH E   | from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    To do this, we calculate ()max i i oa  and ()min i r i ob 

    Determine if an overlap interval exists. To do this, we calculate ()max i i oa  and ()min i r i ob  . If roo   , then a nonzero length overlap interval , rolap o o   exists. Otherwise, olap Null

    work page

  2. [2]

    drooping

    Determine the FOU category. We consider two classes of FOUs: 1) ones having a natural minimum and maximum bound , rxx  , e.g., an interval of probability values, which must lie within 0, 1 ; and 2) ones lacking one or more natural bounds , e.g., an interval of production forecasts for a mining property. To assign a set of intervals to an FOU ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Create reduced interval sets. For interval sets having a non-Null overlap, this is done by removing the overlap interval from each interval, which results in a single set of reduced intervals for Left or Right shoulder FOUs. For all other FOU categories, it results in two sets of reduced intervals. Thus, for Left shoulder FOUs, we have the reduced interva...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Box, G. E. P. and Tiao, G.C., Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992

    work page 1992

  5. [5]

    Congdon, P., Bayesian Statistical Modelling , New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    LII. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances,

    Bayes, T., “ LII. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances,” By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes, F. R. S. communicated by Mr.Richard Price, in a letter to John Canton, A. M. F. R. S., Phil. Trans. R. Soc., 53: 370–418, Jan. 1763, http://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1763.0053

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    O., Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis (Second Edition) , New York: Springer -Verlag Inc., 1985

    Berger, J. O., Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis (Second Edition) , New York: Springer -Verlag Inc., 1985

    work page 1985

  8. [8]

    M., and A.F.M

    Bernardo, J. M., and A.F.M. Smith, Bayesian Theory , New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1994

    work page 1994

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Stone, L.D., Theory of Optimal Search, 2 nd Ed., Arlington, VA: ORSA Books, 1989

    1989

  2. [10]

    McGrayne, S. B. The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes’ Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines & Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011, ISBN 978-0-300-18822-6

    2011

  3. [11]

    Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin,, H. S. Stern and D. B. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd Ed., London: Chapman & Hall Ltd, 2002

    2002

  4. [12]

    Bayesian Analysis: A Practical Approach to Interpret Clinical Trials and Create Clinical Practice Guidelines,

    Bittl, J.A. and Y. He, “Bayesian Analysis: A Practical Approach to Interpret Clinical Trials and Create Clinical Practice Guidelines,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, vol. 10, no. 8, Aug. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003563,

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    Introduction to Bayesian statistics: a practical framework for clinical pharmacists,

    Ven der Linden, L.R., J. Hias, K. Walgraeve, J. Flamaing, I.Spriet and J. Tournoy, “Introduction to Bayesian statistics: a practical framework for clinical pharmacists,” Eur. J. Hosp. Pharm., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 336-340, Aug. 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    Handbook of Bayesian Analysis for Intelligence , CIA- RDP86B00269R001100080001-0, Jun. 1975

    1975

  7. [15]

    Bayesian intelligence analysis,

    Barbieri, D., “Bayesian intelligence analysis,” Proc. 19 th Conf. on Intelligence in the Knowledge Society , Bucharest, Romania, Oct. 2013

    2013

  8. [16]

    Optimal sequential search: a Bayesian approach,

    Assaf, D. and S. Zamir, “Optimal sequential search: a Bayesian approach,” Ann. of Statistics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1213- 1221, 1985

    1985

  9. [17]

    Bayesian statistics and modelling ,

    Van de Schoot, R., S. Depaoli, R. King, B. Kramer, K. Mãrtens, M.G. Tadesse, M. Vannucci, A. Gelman, D. Veen, J. Willemsen and C. Yau, “Bayesian statistics and modelling ,” Nature Reviews Methods Primers, vol. 1, no. 1, Feb. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00017-2

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Generative modelling with Bayesian sample inference,

    Lienen, M. Kollovieh and S. G ünnemann, “Generative modelling with Bayesian sample inference,” arXiv:2502.07580v1, Feb. 2025

    2025

  11. [19]

    Fuzzy Bayesian inference,

    Viertl, R. and O. Sunanta, “Fuzzy Bayesian inference,” Inst. F. Statistik u. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie , Forschungsbericht SM-2013-2, June 2013

    2013

  12. [20]

    León-Rojas, J.M. and M.M. Morgado, Interval fuzzy Bayesian inference,” Soft Methodology and Random Information Systems . vol. 26 of Advances in Soft Computing, pp. 559- 566. DOI: 10.1007/978- 3-540-44465-7_69, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2004

    2004 doi

  13. [21]

    Bayesian forecasting in economics and finance: A modern review,

    Martin, G.M., D.T. Frazier, W. Maneesoonthorn, R. Loaiza-Maya, F. Huber, G. Koop, J. Maheu, D. Nibbering and A. Panagiotelis, “ Bayesian forecasting in economics and finance: A modern review,” Int. J. of Forecasting, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 811-839, Apr.-Jun. 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Hsu, B.S

    Rachev, S.T., J.S.J. Hsu, B.S. Bagasheva, F.J. Fabozzi, Eds., Bayesian Methods in Finance, New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012

    2012

  15. [23]

    Fuzzy Bayesian Inference,

    Yang, C.C., “Fuzzy Bayesian Inference,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Sys., Man & Cybernetics, Orlando, FL, vol. 3, pp. 2707- 2712, Oct. 1997

    1997

  16. [24]

    Determining interval type-2 fuzzy set models for words using data collected from one subject: person FOUs,

    Mendel, J. and D. Wu, “Determining interval type-2 fuzzy set models for words using data collected from one subject: person FOUs,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst ., Beijing, China, Jul. 2014, pp. 768-775

    2014

  17. [25]

    Enhanced interval approach for encoding words into interval type-2 fuzzy sets and its convergence analysis,

    Wu, D., J. Mendel and S. Coupland, “Enhanced interval approach for encoding words into interval type-2 fuzzy sets and its convergence analysis,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 499–513, Jun. 2012

    2012

  18. [26]

    Left shoulder

    is considered the current state of the art, we shall adopt its feature of constructing normal IT2 MFs, but we focus our attention subsequently on a different construction method. In [26], three types of trapezoidal IT2 MFs and their corresponding FOUs may result from the const...

  19. [27]

    The construction of membership functions,

    Norwich, A. M., Turksen , I. B., "The construction of membership functions, " in: R.R. Yager (Ed.), Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory, Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 61- 67, 1982

    1982

  20. [28]

    Modeling words for qualitative distance based on interval type -2 fuzzy sets

    Guo, J., Du, S., "Modeling words for qualitative distance based on interval type -2 fuzzy sets" ISPRS Int. J. Geo - Information, vol. 7, no. 8, p. 291, 2018, 10.3390/ijgi7080291

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    Encoding words into interval type- 2 fuzzy sets using an interval approach,

    Liu, F. and J. Mendel, “Encoding words into interval type- 2 fuzzy sets using an interval approach,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1503-1521, Dec. 2008

    2008

  22. [30]

    Our second contribution is to introduce a novel algorithm for encoding interval inputs from SMEs into corresponding IT2 MFs

    via direct intermarriage between the two technologies. Our second contribution is to introduce a novel algorithm for encoding interval inputs from SMEs into corresponding IT2 MFs. Our algorithm generalizes previous approaches that were aimed toward encoding word MFs from inter...

  23. [31]

    Encoding words into normal interval type-2 fuzzy sets: HM approach,

    Hao, M. , Mendel, J., "Encoding words into normal interval type-2 fuzzy sets: HM approach, " IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 865 -879, 2016, 10.1016/j.ins.2023.02.022

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    Measures for evaluating IT2 FSs constructed from data intervals,

    Baratimehr, K., Moosavi, M. R., Tahayori, H. "Measures for evaluating IT2 FSs constructed from data intervals," Appl. Soft Comput., vol.136, 110084, 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Wu, D. and J. Mendel, Perceptual Computing: Aiding People in Making Subjective Judgments, Hoboken, N.J. John Wiley & Sons, 2010

    2010

  26. [34]

    Enhanced Karnik- Mendel algorithms,

    Wu, D. and J.M. Mendel, "Enhanced Karnik- Mendel algorithms," IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 923 - 934, 2009, 10.1109/TFUZZ.2008.924329

    2009

  27. [35]

    The probability approach to the treatment of uncertainty in artificial intelligence and expert systems,

    Lindley, D.V., “The probability approach to the treatment of uncertainty in artificial intelligence and expert systems,” Statistical Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17-24, Feb. 1987. John T. (Terry) Rickard (S’67-M’75-SM’01) received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical enginee...

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.