Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

This paper claims that the topological symmetry theory for continuous symmetries, built from non-Abelian BF theory, reproduces both non-linear (coset) realizations and spontaneous breaking as pure boundary and corner data.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 17:52 UTC pith:6EG64D2U

load-bearing objection Section 3's non-linear realization constructions are genuinely solid and checkable; the SSB section is an honest but unproven proposal whose vacuum-degeneracy claim may overstate the physics. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2509.10343 v2 pith:6EG64D2U submitted 2025-09-12 hep-th

SymTFT for Continuous Symmetries: Non-linear Realizations and Spontaneous Breaking

Federico Bonetti , Michele Del Zotto , Ruben Minasian This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords SymTFTcontinuous symmetriesnonlinear realizationcoset effective actionspontaneous symmetry breakingWard identitieshigher-form symmetriesBF theory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that the SymTFT for continuous symmetries—a topological bulk theory in one higher dimension—can capture two phenomena that earlier constructions omitted: non-linearly realized symmetry and spontaneous breaking. On the symmetry boundary, imposing A = V^{-1}dV + V^{-1}AV with flat background A turns the bulk BF theory into the universal Callan-Coleman-Wess-Zumino effective action for a coset G/H, including higher p-form and 2-group versions. For spontaneous breaking, the authors place the SymTFT on a slab with a lateral boundary and two corners: a unique topological interface at the symmetry corner enforces the unbroken-symmetry Ward identity =0, while a family of interfaces labeled by a closed form ξ_p gives degenerate boundary conditions transformed by the symmetry, compatible with nonzero one-point functions and with the expected Goldstone vacuum geometry. If correct, Goldstone physics and SSB Ward identities are purely topological boundary/corner data.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the sandwich construction for continuous symmetries extends to non-linear realizations and spontaneous breaking. At the symmetry boundary, the condition A = V^{-1}dV + V^{-1}AV with A flat makes the bulk BF connection pure gauge; closing the sandwich yields the standard CCWZ coset effective action for any G/H, including couplings to background gauge fields. For SSB, the paper formulates the SymTFT on M^d x [z0,z1] with a lateral boundary ∂M^d x [z0,z1] and two corners. A single DA-DB interface at the symmetry corner implements an unbroken symmetry and forces charged one-point functions to vanish; a DA-DA interface gives a continuous family of boundary conditions

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the non-Abelian BF theory S = (1/2π)∫ Tr(B∧F_A) in d+1 dimensions, whose topological operators include Wilson lines and codimension-two 'B-operators' that act as Gukov-Witten operators. The symmetry boundary carries a dynamical G-valued field V with boundary condition A = V^{-1}dV + V^{-1}AV, turning the bulk flat connection into the coset vielbein. For SSB, the machinery is the set of topological boundary conditions D_A and D_B for the Abelian BF theory—Dirichlet-like for A or for B—and their interfaces: a single D_A-D_B interface for unbroken symmetry and a continuous family of D_A-D_A interfaces labeled by ξ_p for broken symmetry. The corner C^{d-1}_{sym} where

Load-bearing premise

The broken-symmetry vacuum degeneracy rests on the assumption, explicitly flagged in Section 4.4, that distinct topological interfaces on the corner C^{d-1}_{sym} give rise to distinct physical boundary conditions after the sandwich is closed; if two interfaces differing by a period collapse to the same boundary condition, the claimed continuous family of vacua is overstated.

What would settle it

Compute the Euclidean partition function (or a charged one-point function) of the closed sandwich for the U(1) 0-form case with two corner interfaces whose parameters differ by 2π, using the explicit interface action (4.15). If the resulting boundary theories coincide, the claimed vacuum manifold R/(2πZ) degenerates and the Goldstone mode count changes. The paper supplies all necessary ingredients for this direct calculation.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, the SymTFT sandwich gives a single boundary-condition-derived route to all Callan-Coleman-Wess-Zumino effective actions for cosets G/H, making Goldstone physics boundary data in a topological bulk.
  • The construction extends to higher p-form symmetries, Abelian and non-Abelian 2-groups, and Q/Z symmetry, reproducing known actions such as axion-Maxwell theory upon closing the sandwich.
  • SSB Ward identities for 0-form and higher-form symmetries follow from the same corner moves: unbroken symmetry forces <O>=0, while broken symmetry allows nonzero one-point functions related across a continuous family of boundary conditions.
  • The family of DA-DA interfaces predicts vacuum manifolds given by R/(2πZ) for U(1), the full group G for non-Abelian 0-form symmetry, and higher p-form gauge fields as the corresponding Nambu-Goldstone modes.
  • The bulk 0-form symmetry swapping B and C implements EM/T-duality as a topological interface, mapping the boundary parameter R to R^{-1} while leaving the physical boundary invariant.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the corner data may determine the full module structure of the symmetry category on boundary conditions; a concrete extension would compute boundary-changing operator product expansions from the explicit D_A-D_A interface action (4.15).
  • The proposal for non-flat Dirichlet boundary conditions (Section 2.5) suggests a route to SymTFTs with background gauge fields; a testable check is that topological operators remain topological only when d_A X_0 = 0, which could be studied on a lattice.
  • The fusion of B-operators is left open; the paper's expectation of a continuum of fusion channels for SU(2) at (2.112)-(2.113) conflicts with alternative pre-averaged fusion rules, and a direct correlation computation could settle which algebra is correct.
  • A numerical check of the SSB vacua could compute one-point functions <O>_v(ξ) for the U(1) case with corner parameter ξ and verify the periodicity and relation <O>_{ξ+2πα}=e^{2π i n α}<O>_ξ; if periodicity collapses, the claimed vacuum manifold would shrink.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript revisits the SymTFT for continuous symmetries based on the non-Abelian BF theory and then uses it to address two previously under-explored aspects: non-linear realizations and spontaneous symmetry breaking. Section 2 develops the bulk topological operators, including Wilson lines, B-operators, non-genuine B-operators, and linking factors, with a proposal for non-flat Dirichlet boundary conditions. Section 3 constructs symmetry-boundary actions that, upon closing the sandwich, reproduce the expected non-linear sigma-model actions: Abelian p-form symmetries, non-Abelian 0-form symmetries with trivial and non-trivial H, Abelian and non-Abelian 2-groups, Q/Z symmetry, and a club-sandwich version of CCWZ actions. Section 4 introduces a boundary-and-corner geometry and derives Ward identities for unbroken and broken symmetries, proposing that families of DA-DA interfaces parametrize vacuum degeneracy. The paper’s central claims are that the SymTFT recovers the CCWZ effective actions for coset models G/H and that the sandwich construction encodes spontaneous breaking and the associated Ward identities purely in boundary and corner data.

Significance. The paper is a valuable contribution to the SymTFT program. Its strengths are the explicit, internally checkable derivations: boundary actions are tested for gauge invariance, equations of motion are written out, linking factors are computed, and the Ward identities follow from concrete topological moves. The constructions are parameter-free in the sense that no numerical fitting or input from a target QFT is used beyond choosing boundary conditions. If the main claims are correct, the paper provides a unified SymTFT perspective on non-linear realizations, higher-form Goldstone modes, and SSB Ward identities, which is likely to be useful for studying generalized symmetries in sigma models and gauge theories. The main caveat is that the spontaneous-breaking interpretation rests on an explicitly stated but unproven assumption about distinctness of corner interfaces, and on a technical lemma about B-operators that is admitted to be unproven.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4.2.3, Eqs. (4.22)-(4.23)] The Ward identities themselves are plausible and follow from the stated topological moves. However, their interpretation as spontaneous symmetry breaking requires that the corner interface 'dressing' step 4′ really changes the physical boundary condition, rather than merely reparameterizing the same theory. This is the same distinctness issue as above. The identities (4.23), (4.31), (4.34) are therefore conditional; the paper should state this limitation prominently in the main text, not only in the later remark, since the Introduction claims recovery of the well-known SSB Ward identities with non-trivial vacuum labels.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.2.3] Typos: 'fucntion', 'contionuous', '1-point fucntion' should be corrected. Also, Figure 6 has 'Figure6' without a space.
  2. [§3.1, after Eq. (3.6)] The text refers to a '5d topological action' in a context where the physical spacetime dimension is arbitrary d; the action is (d+1)-dimensional and the '5d' wording is confusing.
  3. [§2.3.2 and §2.1.3] The notation Q^o_{X0} and D_{X0} uses the same symbol X0 for both the genuine and non-genuine labels, although the paper stresses that the non-genuine operator depends on X0 and not just its adjoint orbit. It would be helpful to use a different symbol or explicitly state the identification (e.g. X0 modulo 2π shifts) in the definition of D_{X0}.
  4. [§3.7] The club-sandwich diagrams are schematic; a sentence explaining the orientation conventions and how the interval collapses in Diagram (3.135) would improve readability.
  5. [§2.4.2] The proposed fusion rule for continuous B-defects is explicitly conjectural and the comparison with [32] is left open. This is fine for a note, but the conjectural status should be stated in the Introduction or in the section summary.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the SymTFT constructions are explicit boundary-action evaluations, and the SSB caveat in §4.4 is a flagged assumption, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—recovering CCWZ actions, 2-group/axion-Maxwell actions, and SSB Ward identities—are obtained by explicitly proposing boundary and corner actions, checking gauge invariance and variational consistency, and then closing the sandwich. For example, the non-Abelian non-linear realization is derived by imposing the on-shell boundary relation A = V^{-1}dV + V^{-1}AV (eq. (3.47)) from the symmetry-boundary action (3.44), and substituting it into the physical-boundary kinetic term (3.51), yielding the standard sigma-model action (3.54). This is an honest evaluation of chosen boundary data, not a fit or a definitional equivalence: the output is not assumed in the input; it is computed from it. Similarly, the SSB Ward identities in Section 4 are derived from the bulk linking factor (2.50) together with the absorption/shift properties of the constructed DA-DB and DA-DA interfaces, not inserted by hand. The only significant caveat is the authors' explicit assumption in §4.4 that distinct topological interfaces on C^{d-1}_{sym} yield distinct physical boundary conditions after closing the sandwich. This assumption is stated openly and is a possible gap in the SSB interpretation, but it is not circularity: no equation or result is reduced to its own input, and no self-citation chain is load-bearing. The construction is a self-contained SymTFT realization of known results, with the usual freedom in choosing boundary conditions that any SymTFT construction requires. Hence no circular step can be exhibited, and the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new fundamental entities (particles, forces, dimensions); its new objects are operators and boundary conditions (non-genuine B-operators, dressed B fields, DA/DB conditions and their interfaces) constructed inside the existing BF/SymTFT framework and checked by explicit computations (linking factors, gauge invariance, Ward identities). The central claim rests on standard mathematics, on the cited CCWZ theorem, and on two author-flagged premises: an unproved coset-decomposition lemma in Section 2.1.3 and the assumption that distinct corner interfaces yield distinct physical boundary conditions in Section 4.4. Model parameters (R, f, f^2, g^2, k, tau_ij) are chosen by hand and are not fitted.

free parameters (5)
  • R (symmetry-boundary parameter, Section 3.1) = real, free; R>0 up to phi_p sign flip
    Labels the Lagrangian algebra of the Abelian SymTFT; the limits R->0, R->infinity give pure Dirichlet conditions. Chosen by hand and controls the radius of the emergent compact scalar.
  • f (physical boundary kinetic coupling, (3.51), (3.61)) = unspecified real constant
    Coefficient of the Yang-Mills-like term on the physical boundary; after closing the sandwich it sets the strength of the CCWZ kinetic term. A free model input, not fixed by the framework.
  • f^2, g^2 (2-group and Q/Z examples, (3.83), (3.126)) = unspecified constants
    Kinetic couplings of the 0-form and 1-form fields on the physical boundary; chosen by hand.
  • k (level in (2.66), (3.70), (3.89), (3.108)) = integer
    Chern-Simons/2-group/Q/Z level; integrality imposed, value otherwise free.
  • tau_ij (Maxwell couplings in the club sandwich, (3.144)) = unspecified matrix
    Gauge couplings of the H-Maxwell slab; model data chosen by hand.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Bianchi identity d_A F_A = 0 and the gauge-invariance structure of the non-Abelian BF action (2.1)-(2.5)
    Basis of all bulk manipulations.
  • standard math Non-Abelian Stokes' formula (2.18), used to derive the Gukov-Witten holonomy and linking factors
    Derived in the text from (2.16)-(2.18).
  • standard math Surjectivity of the exponential map exp: g -> G for compact connected Lie groups, used at (2.46)
    Guarantees every conjugacy class is [e^{2pi X0}].
  • domain assumption CCWZ theorem [1,2]: any G-invariant action with H linearly realized is an H-invariant functional of P, d_Q P, F_Q and Psi
    Used in Section 3.3.2 to claim the sandwich reproduces the most general non-linear realization after closing.
  • ad hoc to paper Unproven decomposition U = U0 h with h in Stab(X0) when P = 0 on B-operator worldvolumes
    Section 2.1.3: 'While we do not have a proof of the last statement, we have checked several examples.' Used for operator presentation (2.33) and for covariantly constant U in the Gukov-Witten derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper Distinct topological interfaces at the corner C^{d-1}_sym give distinct physical boundary conditions after closing the sandwich
    Section 4.4: 'Let us assume that distinct topological interfaces on C^{d-1}_sym give rise in this way to distinct boundary conditions for T_d.' The SSB vacuum-degeneracy interpretation depends on it.
  • domain assumption Topological gapped boundary conditions exist on the lateral boundary B^d_lat and encode the symmetry module of boundary conditions
    Section 4.1, following the strip-algebra constructions for finite symmetries [37,41,43].

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 78552 in / 17996 out tokens · 175022 ms · 2026-08-04T17:52:00.882756+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

It is well known that continuous symmetries of quantum fields can be realized non-linearly, e.g. in the context of sigma models, and can also be spontaneously broken on non-compact spacetimes. In this note we study how these effects are realized in the context of the topological symmetry theory for continuous symmetries. In particular, we explain coset realizations and their higher $p$-form symmetry versions from this perspective, as well as uplifts to higher groups and non-invertible symmetries. Moreover, using a setup with boundaries and corners, we explore spontaneous symmetry breaking scenarios for higher $p$-form symmetries as well as non-Abelian $0$-form symmetries.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Symmetry Spans and Enforced Gaplessness

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Symmetry spans enforce gaplessness when a symmetry E embedded into two larger symmetries C and D has no compatible gapped phase that restricts from both.

  2. Categorical Symmetries via Operator Algebras

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The symmetry category of a 2D QFT with G-symmetry and anomaly k equals the twisted Hilbert space category Hilb^k(G), whose Drinfeld center is the twisted representation category of the conjugation groupoid C*-algebra,...

  3. Continuous symmetries and charge measurement of boundary operators in holography

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Continuous symmetry operators in holography are U-shaped hanging brane bound states (D5-KK in Type IIB, M5-KK in M-theory) whose worldvolume couplings reproduce the Gauss-law symmetry operators and measure charges of ...

  4. Hilbert Space and Defect Hilbert Spaces Associated with Categorical Symmetries

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A quantum mechanical framework is given for Hilbert and defect spaces of line operators in BF+kCS TQFT, with line operator action realized by convolution kernels and matches to Verlinde and semiclassical Hopf-link data.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 75 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    S. R. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zumino,Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1., Phys. Rev.177(1969) 2239–2247

    1969

  2. [2]

    C. G. Callan, Jr., S. R. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zumino,Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2.,Phys. Rev.177(1969) 2247–2250

    1969

  3. [3]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries,JHEP 02(2015) 172, [arXiv:1412.5148]. – 78 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    P. R. S. Gomes,An introduction to higher-form symmetries,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes74 (2023) 1, [arXiv:2303.01817]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Schafer-Nameki,ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,Phys

    S. Schafer-Nameki,ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,Phys. Rept. 1063(2024) 1–55, [arXiv:2305.18296]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    T. D. Brennan and S. Hong,Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics,arXiv:2306.00912

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim,Lectures on generalized symmetries,Phys. Rept.1051(2024) 1–87, [arXiv:2307.07547]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Shao,What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries, arXiv:2308.00747

    S.-H. Shao,What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries, arXiv:2308.00747

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Carqueville, M

    N. Carqueville, M. Del Zotto, and I. Runkel,Topological defects, 11, 2023. arXiv:2311.02449

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Luo, Q.-R

    R. Luo, Q.-R. Wang, and Y.-N. Wang,Lecture notes on generalized symmetries and applications,Phys. Rept.1065(2024) 1–43, [arXiv:2307.09215]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Costa et al.,Simons Lectures on Categorical Symmetries, 11, 2024.arXiv:2411.09082

    D. Costa et al.,Simons Lectures on Categorical Symmetries, 11, 2024.arXiv:2411.09082

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Iqbal,Jena lectures on generalized global symmetries: principles and applications, 7, 2024

    N. Iqbal,Jena lectures on generalized global symmetries: principles and applications, 7, 2024. arXiv:2407.20815

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Kapustin and N

    A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg,Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality,JHEP04(2014) 001, [arXiv:1401.0740]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    Ji and X.-G

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen,Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. Res.2(2020), no. 3 033417, [arXiv:1912.13492]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Gaiotto and J

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp,Orbifold groupoids,JHEP02(2021) 132, [arXiv:2008.05960]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Apruzzi, F

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. García Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.402(2023), no. 1 895–949, [arXiv:2112.02092]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman,Topological symmetry in quantum field theory, arXiv:2209.07471

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Kaidi, K

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng,Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects,Commun. Math. Phys.404(2023), no. 2 1021–1124, [arXiv:2209.11062]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    T. D. Brennan and Z. Sun,A SymTFT for Continuous Symmetries,arXiv:2401.06128

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Antinucci and F

    A. Antinucci and F. Benini,Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries,Phys. Rev. B111 (2025), no. 2 024110, [arXiv:2401.10165]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Bonetti, M

    F. Bonetti, M. Del Zotto, and R. Minasian,SymTFTs for Continuous non-Abelian Symmetries,arXiv:2402.12347

    arXiv

  22. [22]

    Antinucci, F

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, and G. Rizi,Holographic Duals of Symmetry Broken Phases, Fortsch. Phys.72(2024), no. 12 2400172, [arXiv:2408.01418]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Arbalestrier, R

    A. Arbalestrier, R. Argurio, and L. Tizzano,U(1) Gauging, Continuous TQFTs, and Higher Symmetry Structures,arXiv:2502.12997. – 79 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Q. Jia, R. Luo, J. Tian, Y.-N. Wang, and Y. Zhang,Symmetry Topological Field Theory for Flavor Symmetry,arXiv:2503.04546

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Argurio, A

    R. Argurio, A. Collinucci, G. Galati, O. Hulik, and E. Paznokas,Non-Invertible T-duality at Any Radius via Non-Compact SymTFT,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 089, [arXiv:2409.11822]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Paznokas,Non-invertible SO(2) symmetry of 4d Maxwell from continuous gaugings,JHEP 06(2025) 014, [arXiv:2501.14419]

    E. Paznokas,Non-invertible SO(2) symmetry of 4d Maxwell from continuous gaugings,JHEP 06(2025) 014, [arXiv:2501.14419]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Apruzzi, F

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bedogna, and S. Mancani,SymTFT construction of gapless exotic-foliated dual models,arXiv:2504.11449

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    Hsin,Non-Invertible Defects in Nonlinear Sigma Models and Coupling to Topological Orders,arXiv:2212.08608

    P.-S. Hsin,Non-Invertible Defects in Nonlinear Sigma Models and Coupling to Topological Orders,arXiv:2212.08608

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Chen and Y

    S. Chen and Y. Tanizaki,Solitonic Symmetry beyond Homotopy: Invertibility from Bordism and Noninvertibility from Topological Quantum Field Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023), no. 1 011602, [arXiv:2210.13780]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Chen and Y

    S. Chen and Y. Tanizaki,Solitonic symmetry as non-invertible symmetry: cohomology theories with TQFT coefficients,arXiv:2307.00939

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Córdova, T

    C. Córdova, T. T. Dumitrescu, and K. Intriligator,Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries, JHEP02(2019) 184, [arXiv:1802.04790]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Cordova, K

    C. Cordova, K. Ohmori, and T. Rudelius,Generalized symmetry breaking scales and weak gravity conjectures,JHEP11(2022) 154, [arXiv:2202.05866]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Cordova and K

    C. Cordova and K. Ohmori,Noninvertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies, Phys. Rev. X13(2023), no. 1 011034, [arXiv:2205.06243]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Lake,Higher-form symmetries and spontaneous symmetry breaking,arXiv:1802.07747

    E. Lake,Higher-form symmetries and spontaneous symmetry breaking,arXiv:1802.07747

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    D. M. Hofman and N. Iqbal,Goldstone modes and photonization for higher form symmetries, SciPost Phys.6(2019), no. 1 006, [arXiv:1802.09512]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Copetti,Defect Charges, Gapped Boundary Conditions, and the Symmetry TFT, arXiv:2408.01490

    C. Copetti,Defect Charges, Gapped Boundary Conditions, and the Symmetry TFT, arXiv:2408.01490

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Cordova, N

    C. Cordova, N. Holfester, and K. Ohmori,Representation theory of solitons,JHEP06(2025) 001, [arXiv:2408.11045]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Cvetič, R

    M. Cvetič, R. Donagi, J. J. Heckman, M. Hübner, and E. Torres,Cornering relative symmetry theories,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 8 085026, [arXiv:2408.12600]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Copetti, L

    C. Copetti, L. Cordova, and S. Komatsu,S-matrix bootstrap and non-invertible symmetries, JHEP03(2025) 204, [arXiv:2408.13132]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    García Etxebarria, J

    I. García Etxebarria, J. Huertas, and A. M. Uranga,SymTFT Fans: The symmetry theory of 4dN= 4 super Yang-Mills on spaces with boundaries,JHEP03(2025) 179, [arXiv:2409.02156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Y. Choi, B. C. Rayhaun, and Y. Zheng,Generalized Tube Algebras, Symmetry-Resolved Partition Functions, and Twisted Boundary States,arXiv:2409.02159

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    A. Das, J. Molina-Vilaplana, and P. Saura-Bastida,Generalized symmetry resolution of entanglement in conformal field theory for twisted and anyonic sectors,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024), no. 12 125005, [arXiv:2409.02162]. – 80 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Bhardwaj, C

    L. Bhardwaj, C. Copetti, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki,Boundary SymTFT,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 061, [arXiv:2409.02166]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Heymann and T

    J. Heymann and T. Quella,Revisiting the symmetry-resolved entanglement for noninvertible symmetries in 1+1d conformal field theories,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 2 025004, [arXiv:2409.02315]

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Y. Choi, B. C. Rayhaun, and Y. Zheng,Noninvertible Symmetry-Resolved Affleck-Ludwig-Cardy Formula and Entanglement Entropy from the Boundary Tube Algebra, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 25 251602, [arXiv:2409.02806]

    arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Copetti, M

    C. Copetti, M. Del Zotto, K. Ohmori, and Y. Wang,Higher Structure of Chiral Symmetry, Commun. Math. Phys.406(2025), no. 4 73, [arXiv:2305.18282]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Del Zotto, M

    M. Del Zotto, M. Dell’Acqua, and E. Riedel Gårding,The Higher Structure of Symmetries of Axion-Maxwell Theory,arXiv:2411.09685

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Del Zotto, S

    M. Del Zotto, S. N. Meynet, D. Migliorati, and K. Ohmori,Emergent Non-Invertible Symmetries Bridging UV and IR Phases – The Adjoint QCD Example,arXiv:2408.07123

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Cordova, D

    C. Cordova, D. García-Sepúlveda, and K. Ohmori,Higgsing Transitions from Topological Field Theory & Non-Invertible Symmetry in Chern-Simons Matter Theories, arXiv:2504.03614

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Gagliano, A

    F. Gagliano, A. Grigoletto, and K. Ohmori,Higher Representations and Quark Confinement, arXiv:2501.09069

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    G. T. Horowitz,Exactly Soluble Diffeomorphism Invariant Theories,Commun. Math. Phys. 125(1989) 417

    1989

  52. [52]

    A. S. Cattaneo,Cabled Wilson loops in BF theories,J. Math. Phys.37(1996) 3684–3703, [q-alg/9602015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  53. [53]

    A. S. Cattaneo and C. A. Rossi,Higher dimensional BF theories in the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism: the BV action and generalized Wilson loops,Commun. Math. Phys.221(2001) 591–657, [math/0010172]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  54. [54]

    A. S. Cattaneo and C. A. Rossi,Wilson surfaces and higher dimensional knot invariants, Commun. Math. Phys.256(2005) 513–537, [math-ph/0210037]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  55. [55]

    Apruzzi, N

    F. Apruzzi, N. Dondi, I. García Etxebarria, H. T. Lam, and S. Schafer-Nameki,Symmetry TFTs for Continuous Spacetime Symmetries,arXiv:2509.07965

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    A. M. Polyakov,Gauge Fields as Rings of Glue,Nucl. Phys. B164(1980) 171–188

    1980

  57. [57]

    N. E. Bralic,Exact Computation of Loop Averages in Two-Dimensional Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 3090

    1980

  58. [58]

    P. M. Fishbane, S. Gasiorowicz, and P. Kaus,Stokes’ Theorems for Nonabelian Fields,Phys. Rev. D24(1981) 2324

    1981

  59. [59]

    A. A. Kirillov,Lectures on the orbit method, vol. 64. American Mathematical Soc., 2004

    2004

  60. [60]

    Heidenreich, J

    B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius, and I. Valenzuela, Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spectrum,JHEP09(2021) 203, [arXiv:2104.07036]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    M. G. Alford, K.-M. Lee, J. March-Russell, and J. Preskill,Quantum field theory of nonAbelian strings and vortices,Nucl. Phys. B384(1992) 251–317, [hep-th/9112038]. – 81 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  62. [62]

    Dijkgraaf and E

    R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten,Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology,Commun. Math. Phys.129(1990) 393

    1990

  63. [63]

    Dijkgraaf, C

    R. Dijkgraaf, C. Vafa, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde,The Operator Algebra of Orbifold Models,Commun. Math. Phys.123(1989) 485

    1989

  64. [64]

    Roche, V

    P. Roche, V. Pasquier, and R. Dijkgraaf,QuasiHopf algebras, group cohomology and orbifold models,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.18(1990) 60–72

    1990

  65. [65]

    Lusztig,Characters of reductive groups over a finite field

    G. Lusztig,Characters of reductive groups over a finite field. No. 107. Princeton University Press, 1984

    1984

  66. [66]

    Lusztig,Leading coefficients fo character values of hecke algebras, inProc

    G. Lusztig,Leading coefficients fo character values of hecke algebras, inProc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 47, pp. 253–262, 1987

    1987

  67. [67]

    Bakalov, A

    B. Bakalov, A. A. Kirillov, et al.,Lectures on tensor categories and modular functors, vol. 21. American Mathematical Society Providence, RI, 2001

    2001

  68. [68]

    Etingof, S

    P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik,Tensor categories, vol. 205. American Mathematical Soc., 2015

    2015

  69. [69]

    Willerton,The twisted drinfeld double of a finite group via gerbes and finite groupoids, Algebraic & Geometric Topology8(2008), no

    S. Willerton,The twisted drinfeld double of a finite group via gerbes and finite groupoids, Algebraic & Geometric Topology8(2008), no. 3 1419–1457

    2008

  70. [70]

    L. Kong, Y. Tian, and S. Zhou,The center of monoidal 2-categories in 3+ 1d dijkgraaf-witten theory,Advances in Mathematics360(2020) 106928

    2020

  71. [71]

    Ostrik,Module categories over the drinfeld double of a finite group,arXiv preprint math/0202130(2002)

    V. Ostrik,Module categories over the drinfeld double of a finite group,arXiv preprint math/0202130(2002)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  72. [72]

    Bhardwaj and S

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki,Generalized Charges, Part II: Non-Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT,arXiv:2305.17159

    arXiv

  73. [73]

    Bhardwaj, S

    L. Bhardwaj, S. Schafer-Nameki, and J. Wu,Universal Non-Invertible Symmetries,Fortsch. Phys.70(2022), no. 11 2200143, [arXiv:2208.05973]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Bhardwaj, S

    L. Bhardwaj, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari,Unifying constructions of non-invertible symmetries,SciPost Phys.15(2023), no. 3 122, [arXiv:2212.06159]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    I. Bah, P. Jefferson, K. Roumpedakis, and T. Waddleton,Symmetry Operators and Gravity, arXiv:2411.08858

    arXiv

  76. [76]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki,The Club Sandwich: Gapless Phases and Phase Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 156, [arXiv:2312.17322]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    T. D. Brennan, C. Cordova, and T. T. Dumitrescu,Line Defect Quantum Numbers & Anomalies,arXiv:2206.15401

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [78]

    Arbalestrier, R

    A. Arbalestrier, R. Argurio, and L. Tizzano,Noninvertible axial symmetry in QED comes full circle,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 10 105012, [arXiv:2405.06596]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Hasan, S

    A. Hasan, S. Meynet, and D. Migliorati,SL2(R) symmetries of SymTFT and non-invertible U(1) symmetries of Maxwell theory,JHEP12(2024) 131, [arXiv:2405.19218]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  80. [80]

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao,Noninvertible Global Symmetries in the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 16 161601, [arXiv:2205.05086]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.