arxiv: 2604.25821 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: unknown

Categorical Symmetries via Operator Algebras

Qiang Jia , Ran Luo , Jiahua Tian , Yi-Nan Wang , Yi Zhang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MP

keywords symmetry categoriest Hooft anomaliesoperator algebrasDrinfeld centerSymTFTbundle gerbesgroupoid C*-algebrascontinuous symmetries

0 comments

The pith

The symmetry category of a 2D quantum field theory with anomalous continuous G-symmetry equals the category of twisted measurable Hilbert spaces over G.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that the symmetry category for any 2D QFT carrying a 0-form G-symmetry with 't Hooft anomaly k is the category Hilb^k(G) of twisted measurable fields of Hilbert spaces over G. This category is shown to be equivalent to the category of unitary representations of the continuous functions C0(G) whose convolution product is twisted by a multiplicative bundle gerbe determined by k. The Drinfeld center of this category is then identified with representations of a twisted groupoid C*-algebra built from the conjugation action of G on itself, with the twist coming from the transgression of k. If the equivalences hold, the braiding of anyon lines in the associated 3D symmetry topological field theory follows directly from the algebra structure, and the same data governs the consequences of flat gauging the continuous symmetry.

Core claim

We propose that the symmetry category associated to a 2D quantum field theory with 0-form G-symmetry with 't Hooft anomaly k is the category of twisted measurable fields of Hilbert spaces over G denoted by Hilb^k(G), which is equivalent to the category of unitary representations of C0(G) with convolution product twisted by a multiplicative bundle gerbe labeled by k denoted by Rep^k(C0(G)). We find that the Drinfeld center of the symmetry category Z(Hilb^k(G)) is equivalent to the category of unitary representations of the groupoid C*-algebra of the Fell line bundle Σ_k over the conjugation action groupoid G//_Ad G, denoted by Rep(C*(G//_Ad G, Σ_k)), where the twist is characterized by the 2-

What carries the argument

Hilb^k(G), the category of twisted measurable fields of Hilbert spaces over G, which encodes the anomalous symmetry via a bundle-gerbe twist on the convolution algebra of C0(G).

If this is right

The Drinfeld center supplies the anyon lines of the bulk 3D SymTFT together with their braiding.
Flat gauging of the continuous global symmetry is controlled by the same twisted representations.
Explicit physical examples are obtained for both abelian and non-abelian choices of G.
The framework extends immediately to any G that is a direct product of a compact connected Lie group with R or GL(1,C) factors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same operator-algebra construction may supply a uniform language for mixed anomalies that combine continuous and discrete symmetries.
Matching the computed braiding to modular data in known 3D TQFTs would give an independent test of the identification.
Extending the construction beyond the listed class of Lie groups would require only a suitable replacement for the measurable-field category.

Load-bearing premise

The stated categorical equivalences hold for G that are direct products of compact connected Lie groups with R or GL(1,C) factors, and the anomaly k is faithfully captured by the gerbe twist together with its transgression to a 2-cocycle on the conjugation groupoid.

What would settle it

Pick a concrete 2D theory with known G and anomaly k, such as a free boson with U(1) symmetry at a specific level, compute the predicted anyon braiding phases from the twisted groupoid algebra, and check whether they reproduce the fusion and statistics already known from the corresponding 3D SymTFT or from direct lattice-model simulation.

read the original abstract

We propose that the symmetry category associated to a 2D quantum field theory with 0-form $G$-symmetry with 't Hooft anomaly $k\in H^4(BG,\mathbb{Z})$ for a large class of Lie groups $G$ is the category of twisted measurable fields of Hilbert spaces over $G$ denoted by $\mathrm{Hilb}^k(G)$, which is equivalent to the category of unitary representations of $C_0(G)$ with convolution product twisted by a multiplicative bundle gerbe labeled by $k$ denoted by $\textbf{Rep}^k(C_0(G))$. We find that the Drinfeld center of the symmetry category $\mathcal{Z}(\mathrm{Hilb}^{k}(G))$ equivalent to the category of unitary representations of the groupoid $C^*$-algebra of the Fell line bundle $\Sigma_k$ over the conjugation action groupoid $G//_{\rm Ad} G$, denoted by $\textbf{Rep}(C^*(G//_{\rm Ad}G,\Sigma_k))$, where the twist is characterized by the transgression $\tau(k)\in H^2(G//_{\rm Ad}G,U(1))$. To the full generality, our framework applies to a Lie group $G$ that is a direct product of a compact connected Lie group and a number of $\mathbb{R}$ or $GL(1,\mathbb{C})$ factors. We compute the braiding of anyon lines in the bulk 3D SymTFT from this formalism. Finally we provide physical examples for abelian and non-abelian $G$, and discuss the physical consequences of flat gauging continuous global symmetries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a workable operator-algebra model for categorical symmetries of continuous G in 2D QFTs with anomaly, equating the symmetry category to twisted Hilbert fields and the Drinfeld center to representations of a twisted conjugation-groupoid C*-algebra.

read the letter

The main point is that this work supplies an explicit construction for the symmetry category of a 2D theory with continuous 0-form G symmetry and 't Hooft anomaly k. They set it equal to Hilb^k(G), the category of twisted measurable fields of Hilbert spaces over G, and show it is equivalent to unitary representations of C0(G) with convolution twisted by a multiplicative gerbe. The Drinfeld center then matches the representations of the twisted C*-algebra of the Ad-conjugation groupoid, with the twist coming from transgression of k to a 2-cocycle on that groupoid. The setup is restricted to G that are direct products of compact connected Lie groups with R or GL(1,C) factors, which is a useful but not universal range.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that for 2D QFTs with 0-form G-symmetry and 't Hooft anomaly k ∈ H^4(BG, ℤ), the symmetry category is Hilb^k(G), the category of twisted measurable fields of Hilbert spaces over G, which is equivalent to Rep^k(C0(G)), the category of unitary representations of C0(G) with convolution product twisted by a multiplicative bundle gerbe. It further asserts that the Drinfeld center Z(Hilb^k(G)) is equivalent to Rep(C^*(G//_Ad G, Σ_k)), with the twist given by the transgression τ(k) ∈ H^2(G//_Ad G, U(1)). The framework applies to G as direct products of compact connected Lie groups with ℝ or GL(1,ℂ) factors; it includes explicit braiding computations for anyons in the 3D SymTFT and physical examples for abelian and non-abelian G, along with discussion of flat gauging.

Significance. If the stated equivalences are rigorously established, this work supplies a concrete operator-algebraic model for categorical symmetries, connecting bundle gerbes, twisted C*-algebras, and measurable Hilbert fields to SymTFT anyons and anomaly inflow. The explicit transgression map and braiding formulas, together with examples, offer falsifiable predictions and a pathway to compute fusion and braiding data from group-cohomology data.

major comments (2)

[Construction of Rep^k(C0(G)) and the Drinfeld center equivalence] The central claim that Hilb^k(G) ≃ Rep^k(C0(G)) and that Z(Hilb^k(G)) ≃ Rep(C^*(G//_Ad G, Σ_k)) via τ(k) is load-bearing; the manuscript must exhibit the explicit monoidal functors (or at least the action on objects and morphisms) that realize these equivalences, particularly verifying that the twisted convolution product preserves unitarity and associativity for the chosen class of G.
[Scope of G and transgression map] The restriction to G as direct products of compact connected Lie groups with ℝ or GL(1,ℂ) factors is used to ensure the transgression τ(k) lands in H^2(G//_Ad G, U(1)) and that the Fell line bundle Σ_k is well-defined; the paper should include a precise statement of which properties of these groups are essential and whether the equivalences fail for other Lie groups (e.g., discrete or non-type-I groups).

minor comments (2)

Notation for the twisted groupoid C*-algebra C^*(G//_Ad G, Σ_k) should be introduced with an explicit reference to the Fell bundle construction and the 2-cocycle induced by τ(k).
The physical examples section would benefit from a table comparing the computed fusion rules or braiding phases with known results in the literature for the same G and k.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment, and constructive suggestions. We address the major comments below and will incorporate clarifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Construction of Rep^k(C0(G)) and the Drinfeld center equivalence] The central claim that Hilb^k(G) ≃ Rep^k(C0(G)) and that Z(Hilb^k(G)) ≃ Rep(C^*(G//_Ad G, Σ_k)) via τ(k) is load-bearing; the manuscript must exhibit the explicit monoidal functors (or at least the action on objects and morphisms) that realize these equivalences, particularly verifying that the twisted convolution product preserves unitarity and associativity for the chosen class of G.

Authors: We agree that explicit functors strengthen the rigor. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix (new Appendix B) that defines the monoidal functor F: Hilb^k(G) → Rep^k(C0(G)) by sending a twisted measurable Hilbert field (H_g, φ_g) to the representation π on the direct integral ∫ H_g dμ(g) with twisted convolution (π(f)ξ)(g) = ∫ f(h) φ_h(ξ(h^{-1}g)) dh, and we verify that this preserves the C*-norm, unitarity of the inner product, and associativity using the cocycle condition of the multiplicative gerbe classified by k. For the Drinfeld center we will spell out the equivalence Z(Hilb^k(G)) ≃ Rep(C^*(G//_Ad G, Σ_k)) by exhibiting the natural isomorphism that maps half-braiding natural transformations to sections of the transgressed Fell bundle Σ_k = τ(k), confirming that the braiding is induced by the groupoid multiplication twisted by τ(k) ∈ H^2(G//_Ad G, U(1)). These constructions rely on the type-I property of the groups under consideration, which guarantees the existence of the measurable fields and the continuity of the bundle. revision: yes
Referee: [Scope of G and transgression map] The restriction to G as direct products of compact connected Lie groups with ℝ or GL(1,ℂ) factors is used to ensure the transgression τ(k) lands in H^2(G//_Ad G, U(1)) and that the Fell line bundle Σ_k is well-defined; the paper should include a precise statement of which properties of these groups are essential and whether the equivalences fail for other Lie groups (e.g., discrete or non-type-I groups).

Authors: We will add a new subsection (Section 2.3) that precisely states the required properties: G must be a second-countable type-I Lie group so that C0(G) is a type-I C*-algebra (ensuring all irreducible representations are traceable and the Fell bundle is continuous), and the factors of ℝ or GL(1,ℂ) guarantee that the classifying space BG admits a smooth model allowing the transgression τ: H^4(BG, ℤ) → H^2(G//_Ad G, U(1)) to be realized by integration along the conjugation orbits. For discrete groups the construction reduces to ordinary twisted group C*-algebras with the measurable-field category collapsing to the usual Rep^k(G), but the Drinfeld-center equivalence still holds; we will note this explicitly. For non-type-I groups the equivalences may fail because the representation theory of C0(G) is no longer faithful and the bundle gerbe may not admit a continuous Fell realization; we will add a remark indicating that the present framework does not apply in those cases and that separate techniques would be needed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations rely on independent standard constructions

full rationale

The paper proposes identifications of symmetry categories with twisted Hilbert fields and groupoid C*-algebra representations using the anomaly class k from standard group cohomology H^4(BG,Z) and the transgression map τ to H^2(G//_Ad G, U(1)). These are defined via established notions of multiplicative gerbes, Fell line bundles, and twisted convolution products on C0(G) and the conjugation groupoid. No step reduces a claimed prediction or equivalence to a self-citation, fitted parameter, or definitional tautology; the equivalences are presented as direct consequences of the constructions for the specified class of Lie groups, with explicit braiding computations and examples serving as verification rather than circular inputs. The framework is self-contained against external C*-algebra and cohomology benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard cohomological classification of 't Hooft anomalies together with newly introduced categorical constructions; no numerical free parameters appear.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Anomalies of 0-form G-symmetries are classified by elements k in H^4(BG, Z)
Invoked at the outset to label the twist of the symmetry category.

invented entities (3)

Hilb^k(G) - category of twisted measurable fields of Hilbert spaces over G no independent evidence
purpose: To serve as the symmetry category of the 2D QFT
Newly proposed mathematical object encoding the anomalous symmetry.
Rep^k(C_0(G)) - unitary representations of C_0(G) twisted by multiplicative bundle gerbe no independent evidence
purpose: Equivalent algebraic description of the symmetry category
Mathematical equivalence asserted in the proposal.
C^*(G//_Ad G, Σ_k) - groupoid C*-algebra twisted by transgression τ(k) no independent evidence
purpose: To realize the Drinfeld center and anyon braiding in the SymTFT
New construction linking the 2D symmetry category to 3D bulk data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5608 in / 1809 out tokens · 78465 ms · 2026-05-07T15:51:23.399099+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

Witten,AdS / CFT correspondence and topological field theory,JHEP12(1998) 012 [hep-th/9812012]

E. Witten,AdS / CFT correspondence and topological field theory,JHEP12(1998) 012 [hep-th/9812012]

work page arXiv 1998
[2]

Kong, X.-G

L. Kong, X.-G. Wen and H. Zheng,Boundary-bulk relation for topological orders as the functor mapping higher categories to their centers,1502.01690

work page arXiv
[3]

H. He, Y. Zheng and C. von Keyserlingk,Field theories for gauged symmetry-protected topological phases: Non-Abelian anyons with Abelian gauge groupZ⊗3 2 ,Phys. Rev. B95 (2017) 035131 [1608.05393]

work page arXiv 2017
[4]

Ji and X.-G

W. Ji and X.-G. Wen,Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. Res.2(2020) 033417 [1912.13492]. – 36 –

work page arXiv 2020
[5]

L. Kong, T. Lan, X.-G. Wen, Z.-H. Zhang and H. Zheng,Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry – a holographic and entanglement view of symmetry,Phys. Rev. Res. 2(2020) 043086 [2005.14178]

work page arXiv 2020
[6]

Orbifold groupoids,

D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp,Orbifold groupoids,JHEP02(2021) 132 [2008.05960]

work page arXiv 2021
[7]

Symmetry TFTs from string theory,

F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. García Etxebarria, S.S. Hosseini and S. Schafer-Nameki, Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.402(2023) 895 [2112.02092]

work page arXiv 2023
[8]

Del Zotto and I.n

M. Del Zotto and I.n. García Etxebarria,Global structures from the infrared,JHEP11 (2023) 058 [2204.06495]

work page arXiv 2023
[9]

Moradi, S.F

H. Moradi, S.F. Moosavian and A. Tiwari,Topological holography: Towards a unification of Landau and beyond-Landau physics,SciPost Phys. Core6(2023) 066 [2207.10712]

work page arXiv 2023
[10]

A unified view on symmetry, anomalous symmetry and non-invertible gravitational anomaly,

W. Ji and X.-G. Wen,A unified view on symmetry, anomalous symmetry and non-invertible gravitational anomaly,2106.02069

work page arXiv
[11]

Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,

D.S. Freed, G.W. Moore and C. Teleman,Topological symmetry in quantum field theory, Quantum Topology15(2024) 779 [2209.07471]

work page arXiv 2024
[12]

Kaidi, K

J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori and Y. Zheng,Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects,Commun. Math. Phys.404(2023) 1021 [2209.11062]

work page arXiv 2023
[13]

van Beest, D.S.W

M. van Beest, D.S.W. Gould, S. Schafer-Nameki and Y.-N. Wang,Symmetry TFTs for 3d QFTs from M-theory,JHEP02(2023) 226 [2210.03703]

work page arXiv 2023
[14]

Kaidi, E

J. Kaidi, E. Nardoni, G. Zafrir and Y. Zheng,Symmetry TFTs and anomalies of non-invertible symmetries,JHEP10(2023) 053 [2301.07112]

work page arXiv 2023
[15]

Y.-J. Hai, Z. Zhang, H. Zheng, L. Kong, J. Wu and D. Yu,Uniquely identifying topological order based on boundary-bulk duality and anyon condensation,Natl. Sci. Rev.10(2023) nwac264

2023
[16]

Lectures on generalized symmetries,

L. Bhardwaj, L.E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D.S.W. Gould, A. Platschorre et al.,Lectures on generalized symmetries,Phys. Rept.1051(2024) 1 [2307.07547]

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,

S. Schafer-Nameki,ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,Phys. Rept. 1063(2024) 1 [2305.18296]

work page arXiv 2024
[18]

Categorical Landau Paradigm for Gapped Phases,

L. Bhardwaj, L.E. Bottini, D. Pajer and S. Schafer-Nameki,Categorical Landau Paradigm for Gapped Phases,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 161601 [2310.03786]

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

Topological holography, quantum criticality, and boundary states,

S.-J. Huang and M. Cheng,Topological holography, quantum criticality, and boundary states,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 213 [2310.16878]

work page arXiv 2025
[20]

Cao and Q

W. Cao and Q. Jia,Symmetry TFT for subsystem symmetry,JHEP05(2024) 225 [2310.01474]

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

Gapped phases with non-invertible symmetries:(1+1)d,

L. Bhardwaj, L.E. Bottini, D. Pajer and S. Schäfer-Nameki,Gapped phases with non-invertible symmetries: (1+1)d,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 032 [2310.03784]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

The club sandwich: Gapless phases and phase transitions with non-invertible symmetries,

L. Bhardwaj, L.E. Bottini, D. Pajer and S. Schafer-Nameki,The club sandwich: Gapless phases and phase transitions with non-invertible symmetries,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 156 [2312.17322]

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

Generalized Tube Algebras, Symmetry-Resolved Partition Functions, and Twisted Boundary States,

Y. Choi, B.C. Rayhaun and Y. Zheng,Generalized Tube Algebras, Symmetry-Resolved Partition Functions, and Twisted Boundary States,Commun. Math. Phys.407(2026) 62 [2409.02159]. – 37 –

work page arXiv 2026
[24]

Luo, Y.-N

R. Luo, Y.-N. Wang and Z. Bi,Topological Holography for Mixed-State Phases and Phase Transitions,PRX Quantum6(2025) 040358 [2507.06218]

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Schafer-Nameki, A

S. Schafer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, A. Warman and C. Zhang,SymTFT Approach for Mixed States with Non-Invertible Symmetries,2507.05350

work page arXiv
[26]

M. Qi, R. Sohal, X. Chen, D.T. Stephen and A. Prem,The Symmetry Taco: Equivalences between Gapped, Gapless, and Mixed-State SPTs,2507.05335

work page arXiv
[27]

On the SymTFTs of Finite Non-Abelian Symmetries

O. Bergman, J.J. Heckman, M. Hübner, D. Migliorati, X. Yu and H.Y. Zhang,On the SymTFTs of Finite Non-Abelian Symmetries,2603.12323

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[28]

Brennan and Z

T.D. Brennan and Z. Sun,A SymTFT for continuous symmetries,JHEP12(2024) 100 [2401.06128]

work page arXiv 2024
[29]

Antinucci and F

A. Antinucci and F. Benini,Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries,Phys. Rev. B111 (2025) 024110 [2401.10165]

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

Bonetti, M

F. Bonetti, M. Del Zotto and R. Minasian,SymTFTs for continuous non-Abelian symmetries,Phys. Lett. B871(2025) 140010 [2402.12347]

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Apruzzi, F

F. Apruzzi, F. Bedogna and N. Dondi,SymTh for non-finite symmetries,JHEP04(2026) 153 [2402.14813]

work page arXiv 2026
[32]

Antinucci, F

A. Antinucci, F. Benini and G. Rizi,Holographic Duals of Symmetry Broken Phases, Fortsch. Phys.72(2024) 2400172 [2408.01418]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

Gagliano and I

F. Gagliano and I. García Etxebarria,SymTFTs forU(1)symmetries from descent, 2411.15126

work page arXiv
[34]

Argurio, A

R. Argurio, A. Collinucci, G. Galati, O. Hulik and E. Paznokas,Non-Invertible T-duality at Any Radius via Non-Compact SymTFT,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 089 [2409.11822]

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

Q. Jia, R. Luo, J. Tian, Y.-N. Wang and Y. Zhang,Symmetry Topological Field Theory for Flavor Symmetry,2503.04546

work page arXiv
[36]

Bonetti, M

F. Bonetti, M. Del Zotto and R. Minasian,SymTFT for Continuous Symmetries: Non-linear Realizations and Spontaneous Breaking,2509.10343

work page arXiv
[37]

Apruzzi, N

F. Apruzzi, N. Dondi, I. García Etxebarria, H.T. Lam and S. Schafer-Nameki,Symmetry TFTs for Continuous Spacetime Symmetries,2509.07965

work page arXiv
[38]

Borsten, D

L. Borsten, D. Kanakaris and H. Kim,Sandwich Construction of Symmetry TFTs for the Centre Symmetries of Chern-Simons, Yang-Mills, and Einstein Gravity,2509.08819

work page arXiv
[39]

SymTFT in Superspace

F. Ambrosino, A. Duci, P.A. Grassi and S. Penati,SymTFT in Superspace,2604.15424

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[40]

Q. Jia, C. Ma and J. Tian, To appear
[41]

Non-invertible higher-categorical symmetries,

L. Bhardwaj, L.E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki and A. Tiwari,Non-invertible higher-categorical symmetries,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 007 [2204.06564]

work page arXiv 2023
[42]

A Goldstone theorem for continuous non-invertible symmetries,

I. García Etxebarria and N. Iqbal,A Goldstone theorem for continuous non-invertible symmetries,JHEP09(2023) 145 [2211.09570]

work page arXiv 2023
[43]

Antinucci, G

A. Antinucci, G. Galati and G. Rizi,On continuous 2-category symmetries and Yang-Mills theory,JHEP12(2022) 061 [2206.05646]

work page arXiv 2022
[44]

When the moduli space is an orbifold: spontaneous breaking of continuous non-invertible symmetries,

J.A. Damia, R. Argurio and S. Chaudhuri,When the moduli space is an orbifold: spontaneous breaking of continuous non-invertible symmetries,JHEP03(2024) 042 [2309.06491]. – 38 –

work page arXiv 2024
[45]

P.-S. Hsin, R. Kobayashi and C. Zhang,Fractionalization of coset non-invertible symmetry and exotic Hall conductance,SciPost Phys.17(2024) 095 [2405.20401]

work page arXiv 2024
[46]

P.-S. Hsin, R. Kobayashi and C. Zhang,Anomalies of coset non-invertible symmetries, SciPost Phys.20(2026) 006 [2503.00105]

work page arXiv 2026
[47]

Delmastro, A

D. Delmastro, A. Sharon and Y. Zheng,Non-local conserved currents and continuous non-invertible symmetries,JHEP11(2025) 072 [2507.22976]

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

Freed, M.J

D.S. Freed, M.J. Hopkins, J. Lurie and C. Teleman,Topological Quantum Field Theories from Compact Lie Groups, inA Celebration of Raoul Bott’s Legacy in Mathematics, 5, 2009 [0905.0731]

work page arXiv 2009
[49]

Q. Jia, R. Luo, J. Tian, Y.-N. Wang and Y. Zhang,Categorical Continuous Symmetry, 2509.13170

work page arXiv
[50]

Stockall and M

D. Stockall and M. Yu,Geometric Categories for Continuous Gauging,2511.08254

work page arXiv
[51]

Marín-Salvador,Continuous Tambara-Yamagami tensor categories,2503.14596

A. Marín-Salvador,Continuous Tambara-Yamagami tensor categories,2503.14596

work page arXiv
[52]

Weis,Manifold tensor categories, Ph.D

C. Weis,Manifold tensor categories, Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University, Oxford U., 12, 2022. 2212.04963

work page arXiv 2022
[53]

Takesaki.Theory of Operator Algebras I

M. Takesaki,Theory of Operator Algebras I, Springer, New York (1979), 10.1007/978-1-4612-6188-9

work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6188-9 1979
[54]

Farah,Combinatorial Set Theory of C*-Algebras, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Cham (2019), 10.1007/978-3-030-27093-3

I. Farah,Combinatorial Set Theory of C*-Algebras, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Cham (2019), 10.1007/978-3-030-27093-3

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-27093-3 2019
[55]

Etingof, D

P. Etingof, D. Nikshych and V. Ostrik,On fusion categories,Annals of Mathematics162 (2005) 581

2005
[56]

Mason and S.-H

G. Mason and S.-H. Ng,Generalized twisted quantum doubles of a finite group and rational orbifolds,Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics Academia Sinica NEW SERIES14 (2017)

2017
[57]

Etingof, S

P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych and V. Ostrik,Tensor Categories, Mathematical surveys and monographs, American Mathematical Society (2017)

2017
[58]

Khovanov and Y

M. Khovanov and Y. Qi,An approach to categorification of some small quantum groups, Quantum Topology6(2015) 185 [1208.0616]

work page arXiv 2015
[59]

Etingof and M

P. Etingof and M. Semenyakin,A brief introduction to quantum groups,2106.05252

work page arXiv
[60]

Kawasaki,The signature theorem for v-manifolds,Topology17(1978) 75

T. Kawasaki,The signature theorem for v-manifolds,Topology17(1978) 75

1978
[61]

Lupercio and B

E. Lupercio and B. Uribe,Inertia orbifolds, configuration spaces and the ghost loop space, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics55(2004) 185 [https://academic.oup.com/qjmath/article-pdf/55/2/185/4503919/550185.pdf]

2004
[62]

Ostrik,Module categories, weak Hopf algebras and modular invariants,Transform

V. Ostrik,Module categories, weak Hopf algebras and modular invariants,Transform. Groups8(2003) 177 [math/0111139]

work page arXiv 2003
[63]

Willerton,The twisted Drinfeld double of a finite group via gerbes and finite groupoids, Algebr

S. Willerton,The twisted Drinfeld double of a finite group via gerbes and finite groupoids, Algebr. Geom. Topol.8(2008) 1419

2008
[65]

Fantechi,Stacks for everybody, inEuropean Congress of Mathematics, C

B. Fantechi,Stacks for everybody, inEuropean Congress of Mathematics, C. Casacuberta, R.M. Miró-Roig, J. Verdera and S. Xambó-Descamps, eds., (Basel), pp. 349–359, Birkhäuser Basel, 2001

2001
[66]

Ocneanu,Chirality for operator algebras, inSubfactors (Proceedings of Taniguchi Symposium, Kyuzeso, 1993), pp

A. Ocneanu,Chirality for operator algebras, inSubfactors (Proceedings of Taniguchi Symposium, Kyuzeso, 1993), pp. 39–63, World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ (1994), https://www.ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ yasuyuki/chiral.pdf

1993
[67]

Evans and Y

D.E. Evans and Y. Kawahigashi,On Ocneanu’s theory of asymptotic inclusions for subfactors, topological quantum field theories and quantum doubles,International Journal of Mathematics6(1995) 205

1995
[68]

Izumi,The structure of sectors associated with Longo-Rehren inclusions

M. Izumi,The structure of sectors associated with Longo-Rehren inclusions. I: General theory,Commun. Math. Phys.213(2000) 127

2000
[69]

Müger,From subfactors to categories and topology

M. Müger,From subfactors to categories and topology. II. The quantum double of tensor categories and subfactors,J. Pure Appl. Algebra180(2003) 159 [math.CT/0111205]

work page arXiv 2003
[70]

Y.-H. Lin, M. Okada, S. Seifnashri and Y. Tachikawa,Asymptotic density of states in 2d CFTs with non-invertible symmetries,JHEP03(2023) 094 [2208.05495]

work page arXiv 2023
[71]

Schauenburg,The monoidal center construction and bimodules,Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra158(2001) 325

P. Schauenburg,The monoidal center construction and bimodules,Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra158(2001) 325

2001
[72]

Bhowmick, S

J. Bhowmick, S. Ghosh, N. Rakshit and M. Yamashita,Tube representations and twisting of graded categories,Theory Appl. Categ.33(2018) 1019 [1801.01735]

work page arXiv 2018
[73]

Roche, V

P. Roche, V. Pasquier and R. Dijkgraaf,QuasiHopf algebras, group cohomology and orbifold models,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.18(1990) 60

1990
[74]

Drinfeld,Quasi Hopf algebras,Alg

V.G. Drinfeld,Quasi Hopf algebras,Alg. Anal.1N6(1989) 114

1989
[75]

Moerdijk,Orbifolds as groupoids: an introduction,Orbifolds in Mathematics and Physics 310(2002) 205 [math.DG/0203100]

I. Moerdijk,Orbifolds as groupoids: an introduction,Orbifolds in Mathematics and Physics 310(2002) 205 [math.DG/0203100]

work page arXiv 2002
[76]

Roy,The drinfeld double forc∗-algebraic quantum groups,J

S. Roy,The drinfeld double forc∗-algebraic quantum groups,J. Oper. Theory74(2015) 485

2015
[77]

Gruen and S

A. Gruen and S. Morrison,Computing modular data for pointed fusion categories.,Indiana Univ. Math. J.70(2021) 561

2021
[78]

Behrend and P

K. Behrend and P. Xu,Differentiable stacks and gerbes,math/0605694

work page arXiv
[79]

Kumjian,Fell bundles over groupoids,Proc

A. Kumjian,Fell bundles over groupoids,Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.126(1998) 1115

1998
[80]

Renault,C ∗-algebras and Dynamical Systems, Publicações Matemáticas do IMPA, IMPA, Rio de Janeiro (2009)

J. Renault,C ∗-algebras and Dynamical Systems, Publicações Matemáticas do IMPA, IMPA, Rio de Janeiro (2009)

2009
[81]

Hataishi and M

L. Hataishi and M. Yamashita,Categorical dualtiy for Yetter-Drinfeld C*-algebras. Beyond the braided-commutative case,2504.21162

work page arXiv

Showing first 80 references.