pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.12323 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-12 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· math.CT

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

On the SymTFTs of Finite Non-Abelian Symmetries

Oren Bergman , Jonathan J. Heckman , Max H\"ubner , Daniele Migliorati , Xingyang Yu , Hao Y. Zhang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 11:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elmath.CT
keywords SymTFTnon-Abelian symmetryBF theoryDijkgraaf-WittenDrinfeld centerfusion rulesline operators
0
0 comments X

The pith

Finite non-Abelian groups presented as extensions admit discrete BF-like SymTFTs that directly encode electric and magnetic data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs discrete BF-like Lagrangians for the 3D SymTFT of a finite symmetry group G when G can be written as an extension of a finite Abelian group by a finite group. This makes both electric and magnetic symmetry data manifest in the bulk degrees of freedom, unlike the standard Dijkgraaf-Witten description. The construction yields a direct method to recover the fusion rules of the Drinfeld center and produces surface-attaching non-genuine line operators that correspond to individual non-Abelian group elements rather than conjugacy classes alone. The same pattern is indicated for generalization to higher-dimensional SymTFTs.

Core claim

For finite groups G that admit a presentation as an extension by a finite Abelian group and a finite group, the 3D SymTFT is realized by a discrete BF-like theory whose Lagrangian degrees of freedom encode both electric and magnetic symmetry data, thereby streamlining reconstruction of the Drinfeld center fusion rules and permitting surface-attaching non-genuine line operators tied directly to non-Abelian group elements.

What carries the argument

Discrete BF-like theory Lagrangians whose degrees of freedom encode both electric and magnetic data for groups presented as extensions

If this is right

  • The fusion rules of the Drinfeld center follow directly from the bulk Lagrangian degrees of freedom without additional reconstruction steps.
  • Non-genuine line operators can be built that remain attached to surfaces and are labeled by individual non-Abelian group elements.
  • The same Lagrangian construction extends to higher-dimensional SymTFTs for groups admitting analogous presentations.
  • Magnetic data that is obscured in the Dijkgraaf-Witten formulation becomes visible through the new bulk degrees of freedom.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Explicit operator spectra in concrete 3D QFTs with non-Abelian symmetries could be read off from the new surface-attaching lines.
  • Lattice models preserving full non-Abelian symmetry structure may be constructed by discretizing the BF-like action.
  • Anyonic excitations in condensed-matter systems with matching symmetry groups could be classified using the same extension data.

Load-bearing premise

The finite symmetry group must admit a presentation as an extension of a finite Abelian group by a finite group so that its SymTFT can be realized by a discrete BF-like theory with direct electric and magnetic degrees of freedom.

What would settle it

A concrete calculation for a specific non-Abelian group such as S3 in which the constructed BF-like theory produces fusion rules that disagree with the known Drinfeld center would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.12323 by Daniele Migliorati, Hao Y. Zhang, Jonathan J. Heckman, Max H\"ubner, Oren Bergman, Xingyang Yu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: In the SymTFT framework an absolute D-dimensional QFTD is “decompressed” to a relative QFTD, (i.e., a physical boundary condition) and a topological boundary condition, with a bulk SymTFTD+1 capturing the symmetry category C of the absolute QFTD. Symmetry operators of the absolute theory specify objects in the Drinfeld center Z(C), and topologically link with defects which stretch from the physical to topo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Subfigure (i) depicts two genuine codimension-2 operators whose fusion ring is commu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Non-commutativity is manifest in the bulk via the spectrum of non-genuine operators and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Triangulation of the 3-manifold X with vertices i, j, k, . . . and oriented edges labeled by group elements gij , gjk, gki, . . . . the stabilizer of [g], and with a gauge theory interpretation (as we describe below) we can further interpret these as Wilson, vortex (i.e., ’t Hooft lines), and dyonic lines. To accomplish this, we can use the Dijkgraaf-Witten topological gauge theory with gauge group G, whic… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: In subfigure (i) we sketch the reference configuration with Dirichlet boundary condition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: When interchanging the location of Uaˆ and Uˆb one of their end points is dragged through the SPT supporting surface of the other. We sketch four steps. (i): Initial configuration. The dragging is indicated by the arrow. (ii): we can deform M′ 2 as indicated and realize a setup trivially identical to (i). The position of Uaˆ and Uˆb have been interchanged. (iii): We reconnect the M′ 2 shown in (ii) to obta… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Defects in a fully extended 3D SymTFT with fixed bulk phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The $(D+1)$-dimensional symmetry topological field theory (SymTFT$_{D+1}$) of a $D$-dimensional absolute quantum field theory (QFT$_D$) provides a topological characterization of symmetry data. In this framework, the SymTFT comes equipped with a physical boundary specifying a relative QFT, and a topological boundary which specifies the global form of symmetries. In general, there need not be a unique bulk theory which encodes this information but it is often helpful to have a more manifest presentation of symmetries in terms of bulk degrees of freedom. For the case of a finite non-Abelian symmetry group $G$, the bulk SymTFT may be described by a Dijkgraaf-Witten TFT with gauge group $G$. This makes manifest the ``electric'' presentation of the symmetry data but can obscure some of the magnetic data as well as non-Abelian structure present in the absolute QFT$_D$ such as symmetry operators which cannot fully detach from the topological boundary. We address these issues for 3D SymTFTs by constructing discrete BF-like theory Lagrangians for finite groups which admit a presentation as an extension by a finite Abelian group and a finite (possibly non-Abelian) group. This enables us to give a streamlined approach to reconstructing the fusion rules of the accompanying Drinfeld center, but also allows us to construct surface-attaching non-genuine line operators associated directly with non-Abelian group elements rather than just their conjugacy classes. We also sketch how our treatment generalizes to higher-dimensional SymTFTs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to address limitations in the standard Dijkgraaf-Witten description of 3D SymTFTs for finite non-Abelian groups G by constructing discrete BF-like theory Lagrangians for groups that admit an extension presentation 1 → A → G → Q → 1 with A finite Abelian. This is asserted to provide a more manifest encoding of both electric and magnetic data, enable a streamlined reconstruction of the fusion rules of the Drinfeld center, and permit the construction of surface-attaching non-genuine line operators associated directly with non-Abelian group elements rather than conjugacy classes. A sketch of the generalization to higher-dimensional SymTFTs is also included.

Significance. If the explicit Lagrangian and verifications are supplied, the result would offer a useful alternative bulk presentation for SymTFTs of non-Abelian symmetries, potentially simplifying fusion-rule computations and clarifying the structure of non-genuine operators. It builds directly on the known equivalence between DW theory and SymTFT for finite groups while targeting specific gaps in magnetic data and non-Abelian features.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The central construction is described only conceptually in the abstract and introduction: no explicit Lagrangian is written down, no derivation steps from the extension data 1 → A → G → Q → 1 are supplied, and no verification is given that the resulting theory reproduces known Drinfeld-center fusion rules for any concrete non-Abelian G. This absence is load-bearing for the primary claims.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Final section] The sketch of the higher-dimensional generalization is too brief to assess; a short outline of the required modifications to the BF-like action would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. The comment correctly identifies that the abstract and introduction present the main ideas at a conceptual level. We will revise the manuscript to make the explicit Lagrangian, derivation steps, and a concrete verification more prominent from the outset.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Introduction] The central construction is described only conceptually in the abstract and introduction: no explicit Lagrangian is written down, no derivation steps from the extension data 1 → A → G → Q → 1 are supplied, and no verification is given that the resulting theory reproduces known Drinfeld-center fusion rules for any concrete non-Abelian G. This absence is load-bearing for the primary claims.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and introduction are primarily conceptual. The full manuscript derives the discrete BF-like Lagrangian explicitly in Section 3 from the short exact sequence 1 → A → G → Q → 1, including the explicit cocycle data and the resulting action. Section 4 then verifies that the Drinfeld-center fusion rules are reproduced for the concrete non-Abelian example G = S₃ (with A = ℤ₃ and Q = ℤ₂). To address the concern directly, we will add the explicit Lagrangian form and a short summary of the S₃ verification already to the revised introduction, while keeping the detailed derivations in the body. This change strengthens accessibility without altering any results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs explicit discrete BF-like Lagrangians for finite groups G admitting an extension presentation 1 → A → G → Q → 1, using standard group cohomology and the established equivalence between Dijkgraaf-Witten theory and SymTFTs for finite symmetries. The fusion rules of the Drinfeld center and the non-genuine line operators follow directly from this Lagrangian construction and the group-extension data, without any equation reducing an output to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a renamed input. The scope limitation to such groups is stated explicitly rather than smuggled in. No load-bearing step collapses by construction to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on the mathematical fact that certain finite groups admit short exact sequences with Abelian kernel and on the standard identification of the SymTFT bulk with a Dijkgraaf-Witten theory; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Finite groups that appear as symmetries admit a presentation as an extension of a finite Abelian group by a finite group.
    Invoked to restrict the class of groups for which the BF-like Lagrangian is constructed.
  • standard math The bulk SymTFT for a finite group G is given by a Dijkgraaf-Witten theory with gauge group G.
    Standard identification used to motivate the need for an alternative BF-like presentation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5609 in / 1522 out tokens · 28742 ms · 2026-05-15T11:30:18.383286+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Generalized Complexity Distances and Non-Invertible Symmetries

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-invertible symmetries define quantum gates with generalized complexity distances, and simple objects in symmetry categories turn out to be computationally complex in concrete 4D and 2D QFT examples.

  2. On Lagrangians of Non-abelian Dijkgraaf-Witten Theories

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A gauging method from abelian Dijkgraaf-Witten theories yields BF-type Lagrangians for non-abelian cases via local-coefficient cohomologies and homotopy analysis.

  3. Categorical Symmetries via Operator Algebras

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The symmetry category of a 2D QFT with G-symmetry and anomaly k equals the twisted Hilbert space category Hilb^k(G), whose Drinfeld center is the twisted representation category of the conjugation groupoid C*-algebra,...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 32 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,”JHEP02(2015) 172,arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Invariants of three manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups,

    N. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev, “Invariants of three manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups,”Invent. Math.103(1991) 547–597

    work page 1991

  3. [3]

    State sum invariants of 3 manifolds and quantum 6j symbols,

    V. G. Turaev and O. Y. Viro, “State sum invariants of 3 manifolds and quantum 6j symbols,”Topology31(1992) 865–902

    work page 1992

  4. [4]

    Invariants of Piecewise-Linear 3-Manifolds

    J. W. Barrett and B. W. Westbury, “Invariants of piecewise linear three manifolds,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc.348(1996) 3997–4022,arXiv:hep-th/9311155

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  5. [5]

    AdS/CFT Correspondence And Topological Field Theory

    E. Witten, “AdS / CFT correspondence and topological field theory,”JHEP12 (1998) 012,arXiv:hep-th/9812012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    TFT construction of RCFT correlators I: Partition functions

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, “TFT construction of RCFT correlators 1. Partition functions,”Nucl. Phys. B646(2002) 353–497,arXiv:hep-th/0204148

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  7. [7]

    Turaev-Viro invariants as an extended TQFT

    A. K. Jr. and B. Balsam, “Turaev-viro invariants as an extended tqft,” arXiv:1004.1533 [math.GT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Surface operators in 3d Topological Field Theory and 2d Rational Conformal Field Theory

    A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, “Surface operators in 3d Topological Field Theory and 2d Rational Conformal Field Theory,”arXiv:1012.0911 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls

    A. Kitaev and L. Kong, “Models for Gapped Boundaries and Domain Walls,” Commun. Math. Phys.313no. 2, (2012) 351–373,arXiv:1104.5047 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  10. [10]

    Bicategories for boundary conditions and for surface defects in 3-d TFT

    J. Fuchs, C. Schweigert, and A. Valentino, “Bicategories for boundary conditions and for surface defects in 3-d TFT,”Commun. Math. Phys.321(2013) 543–575, arXiv:1203.4568 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    Relative quantum field theory

    D. S. Freed and C. Teleman, “Relative quantum field theory,”Commun. Math. Phys. 326(2014) 459–476,arXiv:1212.1692 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Braided fusion categories, gravitational anomalies, and the mathematical framework for topological orders in any dimensions

    L. Kong and X.-G. Wen, “Braided fusion categories, gravitational anomalies, and the mathematical framework for topological orders in any dimensions,”arXiv:1405.5858 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Boundary-bulk relation in topological orders

    L. Kong, X.-G. Wen, and H. Zheng, “Boundary-bulk relation in topological orders,” Nucl. Phys. B922(2017) 62–76,arXiv:1702.00673 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    6D Fractional Quantum Hall Effect

    J. J. Heckman and L. Tizzano, “6D Fractional Quantum Hall Effect,”JHEP05(2018) 120,arXiv:1708.02250 [hep-th]. 74

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Topological dualities in the Ising model,

    D. S. Freed and C. Teleman, “Topological dualities in the Ising model,”Geom. Topol. 26(2022) 1907–1984,arXiv:1806.00008 [math.AT]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Orbifold groupoids,

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, “Orbifold groupoids,”JHEP02(2021) 132, arXiv:2008.05960 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry – a holographic and entanglement view of symmetry,

    L. Kong, T. Lan, X.-G. Wen, Z.-H. Zhang, and H. Zheng, “Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry – a holographic and entanglement view of symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Res.2no. 4, (2020) 043086,arXiv:2005.14178 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,”arXiv:2112.02092 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, “Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,”arXiv:2209.07471 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    Symmetry TFTs for Non-Invertible Defects,

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs for Non-Invertible Defects,” arXiv:2209.11062 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    The holography of non-invertible self-duality symmetries,

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “The holography of non-invertible self-duality symmetries,”arXiv:2210.09146 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Intermediate defect groups, polarization pairs, and noninvertible duality defects,

    C. Lawrie, X. Yu, and H. Y. Zhang, “Intermediate defect groups, polarization pairs, and noninvertible duality defects,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 2, (2024) 026005, arXiv:2306.11783 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    SymTrees and Multi-Sector QFTs,

    F. Baume, J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, E. Torres, A. P. Turner, and X. Yu, “SymTrees and Multi-Sector QFTs,”arXiv:2310.12980 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    Non-invertible Symmetries in 2D from Type IIB String Theory,

    X. Yu, “Non-invertible Symmetries in 2D from Type IIB String Theory,” arXiv:2310.15339 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    A SymTFT for continuous symmetries,

    T. D. Brennan and Z. Sun, “A SymTFT for continuous symmetries,”JHEP12(2024) 100,arXiv:2401.06128 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries,

    A. Antinucci and F. Benini, “Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries,”Phys. Rev. B111no. 2, (2025) 024110,arXiv:2401.10165 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Remarks on geometric engineering, symmetry TFTs and anomalies,

    M. Del Zotto, S. N. Meynet, and R. Moscrop, “Remarks on geometric engineering, symmetry TFTs and anomalies,”JHEP07(2024) 220,arXiv:2402.18646 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    On the symmetry TFT of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory,

    R. Argurio, F. Benini, M. Bertolini, G. Galati, and P. Niro, “On the symmetry TFT of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory,”JHEP07(2024) 130,arXiv:2404.06601 [hep-th]. 75

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Generalized symmetries in 2D from string theory: SymTFTs, intrinsic relativeness, and anomalies of non-invertible symmetries,

    S. Franco and X. Yu, “Generalized symmetries in 2D from string theory: SymTFTs, intrinsic relativeness, and anomalies of non-invertible symmetries,”JHEP11(2024) 004,arXiv:2404.19761 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Celestial Topology, Symmetry Theories, and Evidence for a NonSUSY D3-Brane CFT,

    J. J. Heckman and M. H¨ ubner, “Celestial Topology, Symmetry Theories, and Evidence for a NonSUSY D3-Brane CFT,”Fortsch. Phys.73no. 4, (2025) 2400270, arXiv:2406.08485 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    SymTFTs forU(1) symmetries from descent,

    F. Gagliano and I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, “SymTFTs forU(1) symmetries from descent,” arXiv:2411.15126 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Representation theory of solitons,

    C. Cordova, N. Holfester, and K. Ohmori, “Representation theory of solitons,”JHEP 06(2025) 001,arXiv:2408.11045 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Cornering relative symmetry theories,

    M. Cvetiˇ c, R. Donagi, J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, and E. Torres, “Cornering relative symmetry theories,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 8, (2025) 085026,arXiv:2408.12600 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Boundary SymTFT,

    L. Bhardwaj, C. Copetti, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Boundary SymTFT,” SciPost Phys.19no. 2, (2025) 061,arXiv:2409.02166 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    SymTFTs for Continuous non-Abelian Symmetries,

    F. Bonetti, M. Del Zotto, and R. Minasian, “SymTFTs for Continuous non-Abelian Symmetries,”arXiv:2402.12347 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    SymTh for non-finite symmetries,

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bedogna, and N. Dondi, “SymTh for non-finite symmetries,” arXiv:2402.14813 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Yu, Gauging in parameter space: A top-down perspective, Phys

    X. Yu, “Gauging in parameter space: A top-down perspective,”Phys. Rev. D112 no. 2, (2025) 025020,arXiv:2411.14997 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Symmetry Topological Field Theory for Flavor Symmetry,

    Q. Jia, R. Luo, J. Tian, Y.-N. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “Symmetry Topological Field Theory for Flavor Symmetry,”arXiv:2503.04546 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    SymTFT construction of gapless exotic-foliated dual models

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bedogna, and S. Mancani, “SymTFT construction of gapless exotic-foliated dual models,”arXiv:2504.11449 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Symmetry Theories, Wigner’s Function, Compactification, and Holography,

    J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, and C. Murdia, “Symmetry Theories, Wigner’s Function, Compactification, and Holography,”arXiv:2505.23887 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Spacetime symmetry-enriched SymTFT: From LSM anomalies to modulated symmetries and beyond,

    S. D. Pace, ¨O. M. Aksoy, and H. T. Lam, “Spacetime symmetry-enriched SymTFT: From LSM anomalies to modulated symmetries and beyond,”SciPost Phys.20no. 1, (2026) 007,arXiv:2507.02036 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    Topological Holography for Mixed-State Phases and Phase Transitions,

    R. Luo, Y.-N. Wang, and Z. Bi, “Topological Holography for Mixed-State Phases and Phase Transitions,”arXiv:2507.06218 [cond-mat.str-el]. 76

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Symmetry TFTs for Continuous Spacetime Symmetries,

    F. Apruzzi, N. Dondi, I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, H. T. Lam, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Symmetry TFTs for Continuous Spacetime Symmetries,”arXiv:2509.07965 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    SymTFT Entanglement and Holographic (Non)-Factorization,

    E. Torres and X. Yu, “SymTFT Entanglement and Holographic (Non)-Factorization,” arXiv:2510.06319 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Aspects of Categorical Symmetries from Branes: SymTFTs and Generalized Charges,

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, D. S. W. Gould, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Aspects of Categorical Symmetries from Branes: SymTFTs and Generalized Charges,” arXiv:2306.16405 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Topological Operators and Completeness of Spectrum in Discrete Gauge Theories,

    T. Rudelius and S.-H. Shao, “Topological Operators and Completeness of Spectrum in Discrete Gauge Theories,”arXiv:2006.10052 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2006

  47. [47]

    Gauge Theory, Ramification, And The Geometric Langlands Program

    S. Gukov and E. Witten, “Gauge Theory, Ramification, And The Geometric Langlands Program,”arXiv:hep-th/0612073

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    On the holographic dual of a topological symmetry operator,

    J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, and C. Murdia, “On the holographic dual of a topological symmetry operator,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 4, (2024) 046007,arXiv:2401.09538 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology,

    R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, “Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology,” Commun. Math. Phys.129(1990) 393

    work page 1990

  50. [50]

    M. D. F. de Wild Propitius,Topological interactions in broken gauge theories. PhD thesis, Amsterdam U., 1995.arXiv:hep-th/9511195

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  51. [51]

    Field Theories for Gauged Symmetry Protected Topological Phases: Abelian Gauge Theories with non-Abelian Quasiparticles

    H. He, Y. Zheng, and C. von Keyserlingk, “Field theories for gauged symmetry-protected topological phases: Non-Abelian anyons with Abelian gauge groupZ ⊗3 2 ,”Phys. Rev. B95no. 3, (2017) 035131,arXiv:1608.05393 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Symmetry TFTs and Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    J. Kaidi, E. Nardoni, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs and Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries,”arXiv:2301.07112 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    String theory and the SymTFT of 3d orthosymplectic Chern-Simons theory,

    O. Bergman and F. Mignosa, “String theory and the SymTFT of 3d orthosymplectic Chern-Simons theory,”JHEP04(2025) 047,arXiv:2412.00184 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    SymTFT actions, Condensable algebras and Categorical anomaly resolutions,

    D. Robbins and S. Roy, “SymTFT actions, Condensable algebras and Categorical anomaly resolutions,”arXiv:2509.05408 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    Non-invertible symmetries in finite-group gauge theory,

    C. Cordova, D. B. Costa, and P.-S. Hsin, “Non-invertible symmetries in finite-group gauge theory,”SciPost Phys.18no. 1, (2025) 019,arXiv:2407.07964 [cond-mat.str-el]. 77

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Non-Invertible Symmetries as Condensation Defects in Finite-Group Gauge Theories,

    C. Cordova, D. B. Costa, and P.-S. Hsin, “Non-Invertible Symmetries as Condensation Defects in Finite-Group Gauge Theories,”arXiv:2412.16681 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    On Gauging Finite Symmetries by Higher Gauging Condensation Defects,

    Y. Xue, E. Y. Yang, and Z. Zhang, “On Gauging Finite Symmetries by Higher Gauging Condensation Defects,”arXiv:2512.22440 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Higher Gauge Theory: 2-Connections on 2-Bundles

    J. Baez and U. Schreiber, “Higher gauge theory: 2-connections on 2-bundles,” arXiv:hep-th/0412325

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    Topological boundary conditions in abelian Chern-Simons theory

    A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, “Topological boundary conditions in abelian Chern-Simons theory,”Nucl. Phys. B845(2011) 393–435,arXiv:1008.0654 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  60. [60]

    Quantum groups,

    V. G. Drinfeld, “Quantum groups,”Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI155(1986) 18–49

    work page 1986

  61. [61]

    Classification of (3 + 1)D bosonic topological orders: The case when pointlike excitations are all bosons,

    T. Lan, L. Kong, and X.-G. Wen, “Classification of (3 + 1)D bosonic topological orders: The case when pointlike excitations are all bosons,”Phys. Rev. X8(Jun,

    work page

  62. [62]

    Classification of 3 + 1D bosonic topological orders (ii): The case when some pointlike excitations are fermions,

    T. Lan and X.-G. Wen, “Classification of 3 + 1D bosonic topological orders (ii): The case when some pointlike excitations are fermions,”Phys. Rev. X9(Apr, 2019) 021005

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    On the Classification of Topological Orders,

    T. Johnson-Freyd, “On the Classification of Topological Orders,”Commun. Math. Phys.393no. 2, (2022) 989–1033,arXiv:2003.06663 [math.CT]

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Generalized Charges, Part II: Non-Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT,

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Generalized Charges, Part II: Non-Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT,”arXiv:2305.17159 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  65. [65]

    Quasi Hopf Algebras, Group Cohomology and Orbifold Models,

    P. Roche, V. Pasquier, and R. Dijkgraaf, “Quasi Hopf Algebras, Group Cohomology and Orbifold Models,”Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.18(1990) 60–72

    work page 1990

  66. [66]

    Etingof, S

    P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik,Tensor Categories. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, 2015

    work page 2015

  67. [67]

    On Gauging Finite Subgroups,

    Y. Tachikawa, “On Gauging Finite Subgroups,”SciPost Phys.8no. 1, (2020) 015, arXiv:1712.09542 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, “On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,”JHEP03(2018) 189,arXiv:1704.02330 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    Non-invertible symmetries ofN= 4 SYM and twisted compactification,

    J. Kaidi, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, “Non-invertible symmetries ofN= 4 SYM and twisted compactification,”JHEP08(2022) 053,arXiv:2205.01104 [hep-th]. 78

    work page arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    Non-Abelian String and Particle Braiding in Topological Order: Modular SL(3,Z) Representation and 3+1D Twisted Gauge Theory

    J. Wang and X.-G. Wen, “Non-Abelian string and particle braiding in topological order: Modular SL(3,Z) representation and (3+1) -dimensional twisted gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. B91no. 3, (2015) 035134,arXiv:1404.7854 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  71. [71]

    A geometric approach to boundaries and surface defects in Dijkgraaf-Witten theories

    J. Fuchs, C. Schweigert, and A. Valentino, “A geometric approach to boundaries and surface defects in Dijkgraaf-Witten theories,”Commun. Math. Phys.332no. 3, (2014) 981–1015,arXiv:1307.3632 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  72. [72]

    Tensor Categories with Fusion Rules of Self-Duality for Finite Abelian Groups,

    D. Tambara and S. Yamagami, “Tensor Categories with Fusion Rules of Self-Duality for Finite Abelian Groups,”Journal of Algebra209no. 2, (1998) 692–707

    work page 1998

  73. [73]

    Notes on gauging noninvertible symmetries. Part I. Multiplicity-free cases,

    A. Perez-Lona, D. Robbins, E. Sharpe, T. Vandermeulen, and X. Yu, “Notes on gauging noninvertible symmetries. Part I. Multiplicity-free cases,”JHEP02(2024) 154,arXiv:2311.16230 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    On the Classification of Topological Field Theories

    J. Lurie, “On the Classification of Topological Field Theories,”arXiv:0905.0465 [math.CT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [75]

    Dualizable tensor categories

    C. L. Douglas, C. Schommer-Pries, and N. Snyder, “Dualizable tensor categories,” arXiv:1312.7188 [math.QA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [76]

    Fully local reshetikhin-turaev theories,

    D. S. Freed, C. I. Scheimbauer, and C. Teleman, “Fully local reshetikhin-turaev theories,”arXiv:2601.05518 [math.QA]

    work page arXiv

  77. [77]

    The Classification of Two-Dimensional Extended Topological Field Theories

    C. J. Schommer-Pries, “The Classification of Two-Dimensional Extended Topological Field Theories,”arXiv:1112.1000 [math.AT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [78]

    Module categories, weak Hopf algebras and modular invariants

    V. Ostrik, “Module categories, weak Hopf algebras and modular invariants,” Transform. Groups8no. 2, (2003) 177–206,arXiv:math/0111139

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  79. [79]

    On fusion categories

    P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, “On fusion categories,”arXiv:math/0203060

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    Higher symmetry and gapped phases of gauge theories

    A. Kapustin and R. Thorngren, “Higher Symmetry and Gapped Phases of Gauge Theories,”Prog. Math.324(2017) 177–202,arXiv:1309.4721 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.