pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2509.19440 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · hep-th· quant-ph

There and Back Again: A Gauging Nexus between Topological and Fracton Phases

Pranay Gorantla , Abhinav Prem , Nathanan Tantivasadakarn , Dominic J. Williamson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 13:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el hep-thquant-ph
keywords X-cube modelfracton phasesgauging1-form symmetrysubsystem symmetrySPT phasestoric codeparticle-string defect
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Gauging the topological 1-form symmetry whose defect is the particle-string yields the X-cube model and a web of dualities to SPT phases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the particle-string object condensed in the coupled-layer construction of the X-cube fracton model can be identified as the defect of a topological 1-form symmetry. Gauging this symmetry produces a network of relations that link the X-cube phase to symmetry-protected topological phases protected by combinations of subsystem and higher-form symmetries. The same procedure reveals how subsystem symmetries fractionalize inside the three-dimensional toric code and how topological symmetries can be non-trivially extended by subsystem symmetries. A sympathetic reader cares because the construction supplies a symmetry-based route for moving between topological layers and geometric fracton phases without invoking explicit lattice couplings at every step.

Core claim

Gauging the topological 1-form symmetry whose defect is the particle-string object produces a rich gauging web that relates the X-Cube model to SPT phases protected by a mix of subsystem and higher-form symmetries, subsystem symmetry fractionalization in the 3+1D Toric Code, and non-trivial extensions of topological symmetries by subsystem symmetries.

What carries the argument

Gauging the topological 1-form symmetry whose defect is the particle-string composite arising from stacked 2+1D toric codes.

If this is right

  • The X-cube model is obtained directly by gauging the 1-form symmetry in the coupled toric-code layers.
  • SPT phases protected by mixed subsystem and higher-form symmetries appear as gauged or ungauged partners in the same web.
  • Subsystem symmetries fractionalize non-trivially when realized inside the 3+1D toric code.
  • Topological symmetries admit non-trivial extensions by subsystem symmetries that survive the gauging process.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same gauging construction may be applied to other coupled-layer fracton models to generate new duality webs.
  • Hidden topological symmetries may be present in additional geometric phases and could be used to classify them by their symmetry-extension data.
  • Lattice or cold-atom realizations of the stacked toric codes could be used to test the predicted fractionalization patterns after controlled gauging.

Load-bearing premise

The particle-string composite can be consistently identified as a defect of a topological 1-form symmetry whose gauging produces the claimed web of dualities and fractionalization patterns without extra anomalies or obstructions.

What would settle it

An explicit computation in which gauging the identified 1-form symmetry in the stacked toric-code layers fails to reproduce the X-cube model's ground-state degeneracy, cube-flux excitations, or restricted mobility would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.19440 by Abhinav Prem, Dominic J. Williamson, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Pranay Gorantla.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The gauging web of topological and subsystem sym [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The cyan surface Σ is along the layers (not shown) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Coupled layer constructions are a valuable tool for capturing the universal properties of certain interacting quantum phases of matter in terms of the simpler data that characterizes the underlying layers. In the study of fracton phases, the X-Cube model in 3+1D can be realized via such a construction by starting with a stack of 2+1D Toric Codes and turning on a coupling which condenses a composite "particle-string" object. In a recent work [Phys. Rev. B 112, 125124 (2025)], we have demonstrated that in fact, the particle-string can be viewed as a symmetry defect of a topological 1-form symmetry. In this paper, we study the result of gauging this symmetry in depth. We unveil a rich gauging web relating the X-Cube model to symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases protected by a mix of subsystem and higher-form symmetries, subsystem symmetry fractionalization in the 3+1D Toric Code, and non-trivial extensions of topological symmetries by subsystem symmetries. Our work emphasizes the importance of topological symmetries in non-topological, geometric phases of matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the gauging of a topological 1-form symmetry whose defect is identified with the particle-string composite in the coupled-layer construction of the X-Cube fracton model. Building on the authors' prior work, it derives a gauging web that relates the X-Cube model to SPT phases protected by mixed subsystem and higher-form symmetries, subsystem symmetry fractionalization patterns in the 3+1D Toric Code, and non-trivial extensions of topological symmetries by subsystem symmetries, while stressing the role of topological symmetries in geometric phases.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work is significant for providing a symmetry-based unification between topological and fracton phases via gauging. It offers concrete relations between models that were previously connected only through explicit constructions, and it highlights how higher-form symmetries can control non-topological orders. The emphasis on anomaly-free gauging and symmetry extensions could guide future classifications of fracton orders and mixed-symmetry SPTs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sections 3 and 4] The central claim rests on the particle-string being a pure topological 1-form symmetry defect whose gauging produces the stated web without additional obstructions. The manuscript imports this identification from the cited prior work but does not provide an explicit lattice-level or cohomology-level check that the layering geometry and subsystem constraints preserve the 1-form symmetry action without introducing subsystem-induced anomalies (see the transition from the symmetry defect definition to the gauging analysis in the main text).
  2. [Section 5] The claimed non-trivial extensions of topological symmetries by subsystem symmetries and the fractionalization patterns in the 3+1D Toric Code are presented as direct consequences of the gauging; however, the manuscript lacks a concrete computation (e.g., of the relevant cocycle or projective representation) showing that these extensions are non-trivial and not reducible to trivial ones under the subsystem constraints.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the mixed symmetries (subsystem plus higher-form) is introduced without a summary table; adding one would clarify the different SPT phases in the gauging web.
  2. A few references to the prior Phys. Rev. B paper could be expanded with specific equation numbers when the current manuscript re-uses its symmetry defect construction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for providing constructive comments that help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each of the major comments below and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Sections 3 and 4] The central claim rests on the particle-string being a pure topological 1-form symmetry defect whose gauging produces the stated web without additional obstructions. The manuscript imports this identification from the cited prior work but does not provide an explicit lattice-level or cohomology-level check that the layering geometry and subsystem constraints preserve the 1-form symmetry action without introducing subsystem-induced anomalies.

    Authors: The identification of the particle-string as a defect of a topological 1-form symmetry is established in detail in our prior work (Phys. Rev. B 112, 125124 (2025)), including lattice constructions and cohomology analysis showing that the symmetry is anomaly-free in the coupled-layer setup. In the present manuscript, we cite this result and proceed to analyze the gauging. To strengthen the connection and address the referee's concern, we have added a short appendix summarizing the key steps of the symmetry defect identification and confirming the absence of subsystem-induced anomalies in the transition to the gauging analysis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section 5] The claimed non-trivial extensions of topological symmetries by subsystem symmetries and the fractionalization patterns in the 3+1D Toric Code are presented as direct consequences of the gauging; however, the manuscript lacks a concrete computation (e.g., of the relevant cocycle or projective representation) showing that these extensions are non-trivial and not reducible to trivial ones under the subsystem constraints.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit computation would make the non-triviality more transparent. In the revised version, we have included a concrete calculation of the relevant cocycle in Section 5. Specifically, we compute the 2-cocycle characterizing the extension of the topological symmetry by the subsystem symmetry and demonstrate through the associated projective representation on the toric code anyons that the extension is non-trivial and irreducible under the subsystem constraints. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central premise relies on self-citation for identifying particle-string as 1-form symmetry defect

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "In a recent work [Phys. Rev. B 112, 125124 (2025)], we have demonstrated that in fact, the particle-string can be viewed as a symmetry defect of a topological 1-form symmetry. In this paper, we study the result of gauging this symmetry in depth. We unveil a rich gauging web relating the X-Cube model to symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases protected by a mix of subsystem and higher-form symmetries, subsystem symmetry fractionalization in the 3+1D Toric Code, and non-trivial extensions of topological symmetries by subsystem symmetries."

    The paper's central results on the gauging web and its claimed relations are obtained by gauging the 1-form symmetry, but the prerequisite identification of the particle-string composite as the defect of this symmetry is justified solely by reference to the authors' overlapping recent prior work rather than derived or verified independently here, making the premise dependent on self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain begins with the coupled-layer construction of the X-Cube model via condensation of the particle-string composite, then invokes the identification of this composite as the defect of a topological 1-form symmetry (taken from the authors' own recent prior work) before applying gauging to derive the web of relations to mixed SPT phases, subsystem fractionalization, and symmetry extensions. The gauging analysis itself introduces new content relating the models, but the load-bearing starting assumption for the entire nexus is imported via self-citation without independent re-derivation or obstruction check in this manuscript. This matches self-citation load-bearing without reducing any explicit prediction to a fitted parameter or self-definition by construction, yielding a moderate score. The provided text shows no other circular patterns such as ansatz smuggling or renaming of known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions of topological quantum field theory and lattice gauge theory in condensed matter, plus the identification of the particle-string as a 1-form symmetry defect from prior work. No free parameters or new invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Existence and consistency of a topological 1-form symmetry whose defect is the particle-string composite in the coupled-layer construction.
    Invoked when moving from the recent work to the gauging analysis.
  • domain assumption Gauging the 1-form symmetry produces a well-defined dual theory without additional anomalies.
    Required for the claimed web of relations to hold.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5751 in / 1502 out tokens · 35930 ms · 2026-05-18T13:49:31.204998+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    the particle-string can be viewed as a symmetry defect of a topological 1-form symmetry... gauging this symmetry in depth... rich gauging web relating the X-Cube model to SPT phases protected by a mix of subsystem and higher-form symmetries

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 95 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    smooth” boundary (removing all plaquettes) results in a trivial 1-form symmetry action on the boundary, while choosing the “rough

    Boundary anomaly of SPT We may restrict the symmetry action to the boundary in order to analyze the mixed anomaly between the pla- nar subsystem symmetry (which terminates as a line sub- system symmetry) and the 1-form symmetry. Because of the rigidity of the subsystem symmetry, different bound- ary planes can give rise to different symmetry actions on th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    every first qubit of each vertex strictly above the plane, and 4 This configuration is able to detect the fracton if we gauged the lineon symmetry. 5 A similar phenomenon happens when choosing the smooth boundary for the 2D cluster state on the Lieb lattice, which is protected by a mix of 0-form and 1-formZ 2 symmetries in 2+1D [70]. In that case, one fin...

    work page

  3. [3]

    every second qubit of each vertex and every qubit of each plaquette on and above the plane. The resulting truncated stabilizers on the boundary are ASPT,trunc v,yz = X X X , ASPT,trunc v,xz = X X X X X , ASPT,trunc v,xy = X X , BSPT,trunc pyz = Z ZZ ZZ Z Z , BSPT,trunc pxz = IZ IZ Z Z Z , BSPT,trunc pxy = Z Z Z Z Z . (71) The symmetry restricted to the bo...

    work page

  4. [4]

    If we useA SPT,trunc v,xz , then we realize the 2+1D Toric Code on the boundary, which spontaneously breaks the 1-form symmetry. 14

    work page

  5. [5]

    If we useB SPT,trunc pxy , then we realize the 2+1D pla- quette Ising model, which spontaneously breaks the lineon subsystem symmetry D. GaugingG ℓ e andG (2) e : T rivial phase with group extension Starting from the HamiltonianH TC,m, we may instead choose to gauge the symmetry generated by the Wilson lines of theeparticle of the Toric Code. To facilitat...

    work page

  6. [6]

    local sym- metry action

    GaugingG ℓ e Starting fromH XC,e in Eq. (80), we may further gauge Gℓ e using the mappingD Gℓ e . This gives rise to the SPT Hamiltonian in Eq. (68). F. GaugingG (1) m andG f m: T rivial phase with group extension We perform a basis transformation on bothH XC,e and the symmetry usingU SEF. The Hamiltonian is now effec- tively the X-Cube model, while the d...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Here, Γnx,ny is a closed curve along the intersection of then x-th andn y-th layers

    The first is the subgroup ofG (1),fol e generated by the lineon operators ηℓ e(Γnx,ny) :=η (1),fol e,yz (Γnx,ny)η(1),fol e,xz (Γnx,ny)−1 , (107) and its variants in the other directions. Here, Γnx,ny is a closed curve along the intersection of then x-th andn y-th layers. This symmetry is denoted asG ℓ e

    work page

  8. [8]

    lineon condensation

    The second is the diagonal subgroup ofG (1),fol m gen- erated by the surface operators η(1) m (Σ) := Y i LiY ni=1 η(1),fol m,jk (Γni), (108) wherei, j, kare cyclic, Σ is a closed surface, and Γni is the intersection of Σ with then i-th layer. When Σ is open, the application ofηcreates a de- fect on its boundary made of a string ofmanyons, commonly known a...

    work page

  9. [9]

    lineon gauge fields

    Gauging ˆG ˆℓ m Gauging the dual lineon subsystem symmetry ˆGˆℓ m takes us back to the foliated stack Eq. (105). To see this, we couple the theoryT TC,m to the foliated version of the “lineon gauge fields”: Lfol = X i LiX ni=1 iN 2π h A(i) e (dA(i) m −B (i) m ) +A ′(i) m (dA′(i) e −b ′ e) + (dΦ(i) e −a e −A ′(i) e )B(i) m i δ(xi −n iℓi)dxi + iN 2π [bm(dae...

    work page

  10. [10]

    This is because gaugingG (2) e in Eq

    GaugingG (2) e On the other hand, if we gauge the 2-form symmetry G(2) e , we end up in the trivial theoryT 0,m. This is because gaugingG (2) e in Eq. (114) is equivalent to gauging the foliated 1-form symmetryG (1),fol e in the foliated stack Eq. (105). This can be seen explicitly by coupling the theory Eq. (114) to aZ N 3-form gauge field, but we do not...

    work page

  11. [11]

    We defer the discussion of this gauging to Sec

    GaugingG (1) m Finally, we can also gauge the 1-form symmetryG (1) m . We defer the discussion of this gauging to Sec. IV D. C. GaugingG (1) m We can gaugeG (1) m by coupling the foliated stack Eq. (105) to aZ N 2-form gauge fieldb e in the 3+1D bulk. The resulting Lagrangian is LXC,e = X i LiX ni=1 iN 2π A(i) m (dA(i) e −b e)δ(xi −n iℓi)dxi + iN 2π amdbe...

    work page

  12. [12]

    Gauging ˆG(1) e Gauging the dual 1-form symmetry ˆG(1) e takes us back to the foliated stack Eq. (105). This can be seen explicitly by coupling the theory Eq. (122) to aZ N 2-form gauge field, but we do not discuss the details of this here

    work page

  13. [13]

    O3uV1Qxj3FooebBX7Ni6lEWBwfg=

    GaugingG f m On the other hand, if we gauge the fracton subsys- tem symmetryG f m ∼= G(1),fol m /G(1) m , we end up in a trivial theory, denoted asT 0,e in Fig. 1. This can be seen by cou- pling the theory Eq. (122) toZ N gauge field combination <latexit sha1_base64="O3uV1Qxj3FooebBX7Ni6lEWBwfg=">AAAO3nicpVdRj9tEEE4LhWDg6MEjLyvuTrpKThrbSYt0TVXBC49FcG2lODr...

    work page

  14. [14]

    lineon” gauge fields for ˆGˆℓ m and (A′(i) m , a′ m) are Lagrange multipliers (“fracton

    GaugingG ℓ e Finally, we can also gauge the lineon subsystem sym- metryG ℓ e. This is explored in Sec. IV D. D. GaugingG ℓ e andG (1) m Since there is no mixed ’t Hooft anomaly betweenG ℓ e andG (1) m in the foliated stack Eq. (105), we can gauge both of these symmetries simultaneously. The resulting Lagrangian is LSPT = X i LiX ni=1 iN 2π h A(i) e dA(i) ...

    work page

  15. [15]

    (132) together correspond to the foliated field theory ofZ N X- Cube model Eq

    Whenp= 0, one can recognize the second line and the first term of the third line of Eq. (132) together correspond to the foliated field theory ofZ N X- Cube model Eq. (122), whereas the remaining term corresponds to the 3+1DZ N gauge theory. Relat- edly, there is a fully mobile particle-like excitation described by the Wilson line exp(i H γ ae). This is t...

    work page

  16. [16]

    Whenp= 1, which is the case of interest to us, the resulting Lagrangian describes a foliated stack of 2+1DZ N gauge theories Eq. (105). This can be seen by integrating outb m, which setsb e =da e, and then replacingA (i) e →A (i) e +a e, which yields Eq. (105). Relatedly, this theory does not have fully mobile particle-like excitations. Therefore, this co...

    work page

  17. [17]

    Symme- try QFT

    Boundary ofSPT p One of the hallmarks of an SPT phase is that it is not invariant under background gauge transformations in the presence of a boundary. Consider the variation of the Lagrangian Eq. (132) of SPT p under the gauge transformation Eq. (133): δLSPTp =d X i LiX ni=1 iN 2π α(i) m (dA(i) e −b e)δ(xi −n iℓi)dxi + iN 2π [αmdbe +α edbm −p(β ebm +b eβ...

    work page

  18. [18]

    Gorantla, A

    P. Gorantla, A. Prem, N. Tantivasadakarn, and D. J. Williamson, String membrane nets from higher-form gauging: An alternate route top-string condensation, Phys. Rev. B112, 125124 (2025). 28

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    R. M. Nandkishore and M. Hermele, Fractons, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics10, 295 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Pretko, X

    M. Pretko, X. Chen, and Y. You, Fracton phases of matter, International Journal of Modern Physics A35, 2030003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Haah, Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions with- out string logical operators, Phys

    J. Haah, Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions with- out string logical operators, Phys. Rev. A83, 042330 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    Bravyi and J

    S. Bravyi and J. Haah, Quantum self-correction in the 3d cubic code model, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 200501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Vijay, J

    S. Vijay, J. Haah, and L. Fu, A new kind of topological quantum order: A dimensional hierarchy of quasiparti- cles built from stationary excitations, Phys. Rev. B92, 235136 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Vijay, J

    S. Vijay, J. Haah, and L. Fu, Fracton topological order, generalized lattice gauge theory, and duality, Phys. Rev. B94, 235157 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    D. J. Williamson, Fractal symmetries: Ungauging the cu- bic code, Phys. Rev. B94, 155128 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Shirley, K

    W. Shirley, K. Slagle, Z. Wang, and X. Chen, Fracton models on general three-dimensional manifolds, Phys. Rev. X8, 031051 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Slagle and Y

    K. Slagle and Y. B. Kim, X-cube model on generic lat- tices: Fracton phases and geometric order, Phys. Rev. B 97, 165106 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Slagle, A

    K. Slagle, A. Prem, and M. Pretko, Symmetric tensor gauge theories on curved spaces, Annals of Physics410, 167910 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Slagle and Y

    K. Slagle and Y. B. Kim, Quantum field theory of x-cube fracton topological order and robust degeneracy from ge- ometry, Phys. Rev. B96, 195139 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Slagle, Foliated quantum field theory of fracton order, Phys

    K. Slagle, Foliated quantum field theory of fracton order, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 101603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Seiberg, Field Theories With a Vector Global Symme- try, SciPost Phys.8, 50 (2020)

    N. Seiberg, Field Theories With a Vector Global Symme- try, SciPost Phys.8, 50 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Seiberg and S.-H

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, Exotic Symmetries, Dual- ity, and Fractons in 2+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory, SciPost Phys.10, 027 (2021), arXiv:2003.10466 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Seiberg and S.-H

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, ExoticZ N symmetries, dual- ity, and fractons in 3+1-dimensional quantum field the- ory, SciPost Physics10, 003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Gorantla, H

    P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao, A modified Villain formulation of fractons and other exotic theories, Journal of Mathematical Physics62, 102301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Slagle, D

    K. Slagle, D. Aasen, and D. Williamson, Foliated field theory and string-membrane-net condensation picture of fracton order, SciPost Physics6, 043 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Wen, Systematic construction of gapped nonliquid states, Phys

    X.-G. Wen, Systematic construction of gapped nonliquid states, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033300 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Aasen, D

    D. Aasen, D. Bulmash, A. Prem, K. Slagle, and D. J. Williamson, Topological defect networks for fractons of all types, Physical Review Research2, 043165 (2020), arXiv:2002.05166 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Wang, Nonliquid cellular states: Gluing gauge-higher- symmetry-breaking versus gauge-higher-symmetry- extension interfacial defects, Phys

    J. Wang, Nonliquid cellular states: Gluing gauge-higher- symmetry-breaking versus gauge-higher-symmetry- extension interfacial defects, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023258 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Z. Song, A. Dua, W. Shirley, and D. J. Williamson, Topological Defect Network Representations of Frac- ton Stabilizer Codes, PRX Quantum4, 010304 (2023), arXiv:2112.14717

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Yoshida, Exotic topological order in fractal spin liq- uids, Phys

    B. Yoshida, Exotic topological order in fractal spin liq- uids, Phys. Rev. B88, 125122 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    H. Song, A. Prem, S.-J. Huang, and M. A. Martin- Delgado, Twisted fracton models in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B99, 155118 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Prem, S.-J

    A. Prem, S.-J. Huang, H. Song, and M. Hermele, Cage- net fracton models, Phys. Rev. X9, 021010 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Prem and D

    A. Prem and D. J. Williamson, Gauging permutation symmetries as a route to non-Abelian fractons, SciPost Phys.7, 68 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Bulmash and M

    D. Bulmash and M. Barkeshli, Gauging fractons: Im- mobile non-abelian quasiparticles, fractals, and position- dependent degeneracies, Phys. Rev. B100, 155146 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [46]

    Y. You, T. Devakul, S. L. Sondhi, and F. J. Burnell, Fractonic chern-simons and bf theories, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023249 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [47]

    Tantivasadakarn, Jordan-wigner dualities for translation-invariant hamiltonians in any dimen- sion: Emergent fermions in fracton topological order, Phys

    N. Tantivasadakarn, Jordan-wigner dualities for translation-invariant hamiltonians in any dimen- sion: Emergent fermions in fracton topological order, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023353 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [48]

    Shirley, Fractonic order and emergent fermionic gauge theory (2020), arXiv:2002.12026 [cond-mat.str-el]

    W. Shirley, Fractonic order and emergent fermionic gauge theory (2020), arXiv:2002.12026 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [49]

    Tantivasadakarn, W

    N. Tantivasadakarn, W. Ji, and S. Vijay, Hybrid fracton phases: Parent orders for liquid and nonliquid quantum phases, Phys. Rev. B103, 245136 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [50]

    Tantivasadakarn, W

    N. Tantivasadakarn, W. Ji, and S. Vijay, Non-abelian hybrid fracton orders, Phys. Rev. B104, 115117 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [51]

    Hsin and K

    P.-S. Hsin and K. Slagle, Comments on foliated gauge theories and dualities in 3+1d, SciPost Phys.11, 032 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [52]

    Gorantla, H

    P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao, Gapped lineon and fracton models on graphs, Phys. Rev. B107, 125121 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [53]

    Boesl, Y.-J

    J. Boesl, Y.-J. Liu, W.-T. Xu, F. Pollmann, and M. Knap, Quantum phase transitions between symmetry-enriched fracton phases, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18688 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [54]

    A. Dua, I. H. Kim, M. Cheng, and D. J. Williamson, Sorting topological stabilizer models in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B100, 155137 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [55]

    Y. You, T. Devakul, F. J. Burnell, and S. L. Sondhi, Subsystem symmetry protected topological order, Phys. Rev. B98, 035112 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [56]

    Devakul, D

    T. Devakul, D. J. Williamson, and Y. You, Classification of subsystem symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. B98, 235121 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [57]

    D. J. Williamson, A. Dua, and M. Cheng, Spurious topo- logical entanglement entropy from subsystem symme- tries, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 140506 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [58]

    D. J. Williamson, Z. Bi, and M. Cheng, Fractonic matter in symmetry-enriched U(1) gauge theory, Phys. Rev. B 100, 125150 (2019)

    work page 2019

  58. [59]

    Shirley, K

    W. Shirley, K. Slagle, and X. Chen, Foliated fracton order from gauging subsystem symmetries, SciPost Physics6, 041 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [60]

    D. T. Stephen, J. Garre-Rubio, A. Dua, and D. J. Williamson, Subsystem symmetry enriched topolog- ical order in three dimensions, Physical Review Research2, 10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033331 (2020), arXiv:2004.04181

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033331 2020

  60. [61]

    Shirley, X

    W. Shirley, X. Liu, and A. Dua, Emergent fermionic gauge theory and foliated fracton order in the chamon 29 model, Phys. Rev. B107, 035136 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [62]

    Isotropic Layer Construction and Phase Diagram for Fracton Topological Phases

    S. Vijay, Isotropic Layer Construction and Phase Di- agram for Fracton Topological Phases, arXiv e-prints 10.48550/arXiv.1701.00762 (2017), arXiv:1701.00762 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.00762 2017

  62. [63]

    H. Ma, E. Lake, X. Chen, and M. Hermele, Fracton topo- logical order via coupled layers, Phys. Rev. B95, 245126 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [64]

    G. B. Hal´ asz, T. H. Hsieh, and L. Balents, Fracton topo- logical phases from strongly coupled spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 257202 (2017)

    work page 2017

  64. [65]

    D. J. Williamson and M. Cheng, Designer non-abelian fractons from topological layers, Phys. Rev. B107, 035103 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [66]

    D. J. Williamson and T. Devakul, Type-II frac- tons from coupled spin chains and layers, Physical Review B103, 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.155140 (2021), arXiv:2007.07894

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.155140 2021

  66. [67]

    Sullivan, T

    J. Sullivan, T. Iadecola, and D. J. Williamson, Planar p-string condensation: Chiral fracton phases from frac- tional quantum hall layers and beyond, Phys. Rev. B 103, 205301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [68]

    Vafa, Quantum Symmetries of String Vacua, Mod

    C. Vafa, Quantum Symmetries of String Vacua, Mod. Phys. Lett. A4, 1615 (1989)

    work page 1989

  68. [69]

    Tachikawa, On gauging finite subgroups, SciPost Phys.8, 015 (2020)

    Y. Tachikawa, On gauging finite subgroups, SciPost Phys.8, 015 (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [70]

    Gaiotto and J

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, Orbifold groupoids, Journal of High Energy Physics2021, 132 (2021)

    work page 2021

  70. [71]

    Zhu, J.-Y

    G.-Y. Zhu, J.-Y. Chen, P. Ye, and S. Trebst, Topological fracton quantum phase transitions by tuning exact tensor network states, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216704 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [72]

    Lake and M

    E. Lake and M. Hermele, Subdimensional criticality: Condensation of lineons and planons in the x-cube model, Phys. Rev. B104, 165121 (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [73]

    B. C. Rayhaun and D. J. Williamson, Higher-form sub- system symmetry breaking: Subdimensional criticality and fracton phase transitions, SciPost Phys.15, 017 (2023)

    work page 2023

  73. [74]

    D. T. Stephen, A. Dua, J. Garre-Rubio, D. J. Williamson, and M. Hermele, Fractionalization of subsystem symme- tries in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B106, 085104 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [75]

    P.-S. Hsin, D. T. Stephen, A. Dua, and D. J. Williamson, Subsystem symmetry fractionalization and foliated field theory, SciPost Phys.18, 147 (2025)

    work page 2025

  75. [76]

    The Bond-Algebraic Approach to Dualities

    E. Cobanera, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov, The Bond- Algebraic Approach to Dualities, Adv. Phys.60, 679 (2011), arXiv:1103.2776 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  76. [77]

    Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases

    M. Levin and Z. C. Gu, Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases, Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics86, 115109 (2012), arXiv:1202.3120

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  77. [78]

    Gauging quantum states: from global to local symmetries in many-body systems

    J. Haegeman, K. Van Acoleyen, N. Schuch, J. Ignacio Cirac, and F. Verstraete, Gauging quantum states: From global to local symmetries in many-body systems, Phys- ical Review X5, 11024 (2015), arXiv:1407.1025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  78. [79]

    Topological phases with generalized global symmetries

    B. Yoshida, Topological phases with generalized global symmetries, Phys. Rev. B93, 155131 (2016), arXiv:1508.03468 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  79. [80]

    Ungauging quantum error-correcting codes

    A. Kubica and B. Yoshida, Ungauging quan- tum error-correcting codes, arXiv e-prints 10.48550/arXiv.1805.01836 (2018), arXiv:1805.01836 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.01836 2018

  80. [81]

    Radiˇ cevi´ c, Systematic Constructions of Fracton The- ories, (2019), arXiv:1910.06336 [cond-mat.str-el]

    D. Radiˇ cevi´ c, Systematic Constructions of Fracton The- ories, (2019), arXiv:1910.06336 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.