Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 159 references

Amplituhedra for generic quantum processes via the TQNN representation of UQC

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Within a topological quantum neural network, every universal quantum computation corresponds to a scattering process whose amplitudes are encoded by an amplituhedron, and conversely.

desk verdict A competent, honest speculative proposal that re-derives UQC via TQNNs and then sketches—but does not prove—a correspondence to amplituhedra; worth refereeing as a conjecture. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.19772 v3 pith:CDCX7CAF submitted 2025-09-24 quant-ph hep-phhep-th

Chris Fields , James F. Glazebrook , Antonino Marcianò , Emanuele Zappala This is my paper
classification quant-phhep-phhep-th MSC 81P6857R5681T18
keywords AmplituhedronTopologicalquantumneuralnetworkUniversalcomputationTuraev-ViromodelReshetikhin-TuraevinvariantScatteringamplitudeserror-correctingcodesPositivegeometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a formal correspondence between universal quantum computation (UQC) and scattering processes, mediated by topological quantum neural networks (TQNNs). The authors show that TQNNs, which are topological quantum field theories in a spin-network basis, can implement UQC by way of Reshetikhin-Turaev and Turaev-Viro state-sum invariants. They then argue that the structure of the Turaev-Viro model matches the positive geometry of amplituhedra, the geometric objects that encode scattering amplitudes in planar N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. If correct, every universal quantum computation has a geometric representation as an amplituhedron, extending the amplitude construction to generic quantum processes.

What carries the argument

The central objects are TQNNs—topological quantum field theories formulated on spin-networks—and the Reshetikhin-Turaev (RT) and Turaev-Viro (TV) state-sum invariants, which are related by the chain-mail construction: the TV invariant is the absolute square of the RT invariant. The TV model's dependence on the quantum group U_q(sl(2)) is mirrored by the quantum cluster algebra structure of the amplituhedron's coordinate ring, and matching the deformation parameter q with the canonical form establishes the geometric correspondence. This chain turns topological invariants into scattering amplitudes.

What would settle it

If a specific universal quantum computation, such as a simple two-qubit gate implemented in a TQNN, can be shown not to admit a unique amplitude under any reasonable coarse-graining, or if its purported amplituhedron volume fails to reproduce the unitary transition probability, then the correspondence would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is Theorem 2: within a TQNN, a universal quantum computation corresponds to a scattering process with amplitudes given by an amplituhedron, and conversely. This is established by first showing that TQNNs implement UQC (Theorem 1), using the Reshetikhin-Turaev modular functor and its equivalence to the Turaev-Viro state sum, which acts as a quantum error-correcting code. The correspondence to amplituhedra is then argued through a parallel between the quantum group U_q(sl(2)) used in the Turaev-Viro model and the quantum cluster algebra of the amplituhedron's coordinate ring, with the deformation parameter q matched to the canonical form. The result implies that a

Load-bearing premise

Amplituhedra and their amplitudes are only well-defined if the quantum process has well-defined, unique amplitudes, which depends on state purity and the level of coarse-graining; the paper explicitly leaves this as an open question.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any quantum circuit that can be implemented within a TQNN admits a geometric representation as an amplituhedron, allowing amplitudes to be computed without perturbative or off-shell methods.
  • The Turaev-Viro model, interpreted as a quantum error-correcting code, provides a concrete physical mechanism for UQC through TQNNs, linking 3-manifold topology to quantum information processing.
  • Because computing the TV invariant is #P-hard, the correspondence suggests that evaluating amplituhedron amplitudes for generic processes is computationally hard, with consequences for quantum complexity theory.
  • The operational equivalence of computation and scattering, together with the amplituhedron representation, offers a new route for quantum simulation of scattering in scalar field theories and for studying complexity measures such as the momentum/complexity correspondence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to construct explicit amplituhedron volumes for small quantum circuits (e.g., two-qubit gates) and verify that they reproduce known transition probabilities, providing a concrete check of the correspondence.
  • If the correspondence holds for all generic quantum processes, it would unify the geometric description of particle physics with quantum information science, potentially offering a 'positive geometry' formulation of quantum gravity, although the paper leaves the uniqueness of amplitudes open.
  • The edge complexity of the amplituhedron might serve as an operational, but not within-protocol observable, measure of how much two parties 'speak the same language' in an LOCC protocol, suggesting a new diagnostic for quantum reference frame alignment.
  • The link to #P-hardness raises the possibility that the difficulty of computing amplituhedron amplitudes could be used to probe the P vs NP question, if a family of computations is found whose geometry complexity scales in a way that distinguishes the classes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops an operational and formal bridge between universal quantum computation (UQC) and scattering processes. It first argues, using an LOCC/QRF framework, that any computation can be viewed as a scattering process and vice versa. It then reviews TQNNs built from Reshetikhin-Turaev and Turaev-Viro TQFTs, and claims (Theorem 1) that such TQNNs implement UQC, grounding this in known results on topological quantum computation and Turaev-Viro quantum error-correcting codes. The central new claim is Theorem 2 in §4.5: within a TQNN, a UQC corresponds to a scattering process with amplitudes given by an amplituhedron, and conversely. The paper supports this by a series of analogies between the Turaev-Viro model (tetrahedra, 6j-symbols, quantum group U_q(sl(2))) and the amplituhedron (positroid cells, BCFW recursion, cluster algebras), and it postulates a cell-complex map in Eq. (37). The conclusion discusses potential applications and explicitly concedes that well-defined unique amplitudes for generic quantum processes remain an open question.

Significance. If Theorem 2 were established, the paper would provide a genuinely new bridge between topological quantum computation and positive geometry, potentially extending amplituhedron methods from planar N=4 SYM to arbitrary quantum processes. The background material in §§3.2–3.9 is a coherent synthesis of established results: the relation between RT and TV invariants, the construction of TV codes as QECCs, and the universality of the Freedman–Kitaev–Wang model are all supported by standard citations. However, the new claim is not demonstrated. The only constructive step toward Theorem 2 is a postulate (Eq. (37)), and the paper itself states that the well-definedness of amplitudes for generic processes is open. Thus the paper is best read as a speculative research proposal rather than an established formal result.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.5, Theorem 2 and Eq. (37)] The central correspondence is asserted, not proved. Theorem 2 is introduced by “the above discussion and details ... can be summarized by,” and the only constructive content is Eq. (37), where the authors “postulate” maps between TV tetrahedra and positroid cells as maps of cell-complexes. No explicit dictionary is given from TQNN data (a triangulated 3-manifold, edge labelings, boundary spin networks, a mapping-class element h, level k) to amplituhedron data (n, k, Z, helicity sector, loop number). Without such a map, the parallels listed in §§4.3–4.5 remain analogies, not a correspondence.
  2. [§4.5, after Eq. (37)] Even if a cell-complex map were intended, it must be compatible with the triangulation independence of the Turaev-Viro state sum. The TV invariant does not depend on the choice of triangulation, so any assignment of positroid cells to tetrahedra must be invariant under Pachner moves, or at least accompanied by a rule for how the amplituhedron data transforms under these moves. The paper neither states such a rule nor checks invariance. This is load-bearing because Theorem 2 quantifies over all TQNN computations, not just a preferred triangulation.
  3. [§4.5, Eq. (36)] The q-matching is not derived. In the TV model q is a root of unity fixed by the level k, while in Eq. (36) q appears as the formal deformation parameter of a quantum torus/cluster algebra via x_i x_j = q^{2 ε_{ij}} x_j x_i. The paper provides no relation between k (or the edge spins) and the cluster data (ε_{ij}, exponents a_{ij}). Moreover, Eq. (36) is presented without derivation from amplituhedron geometry and without checking that its logarithmic singularities reproduce the canonical form. This identification is a free parameter, not a theorem.
  4. [§5, first paragraph] The paper explicitly concedes: “Amplituhedra are well-defined only if the amplitudes they represent are well-defined. Whether unique amplituhedra can be assigned to a process depends on whether unique amplitudes can be assigned, which in turn depends on state purity and hence the level of effective coarse-graining.” This directly limits the claim of amplituhedra for generic quantum processes. Even in the TQNN-restricted case where transition amplitudes are well defined, Theorem 2 lacks the proof requested in the preceding comments; the generic-process extension is therefore unsupported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (37)] Typographical issues: “postitroid” should be “positroid,” and “tetraheda” should be “tetrahedra.” The notation “positroid (cells) polytopes” is ambiguous; presumably “positroid cell polytopes” or simply “positroid cells” is intended.
  2. [§4.4, Eq. (26)] The displayed Poisson bracket uses a four-dimensional ε_{μνρσ} together with δ^{(D)}(x−y) in a formula claimed for arbitrary dimension D. This is inconsistent; either the formula should be restricted to D=4 or the ε symbol should be replaced by the appropriate D-dimensional structure.
  3. [§4.4, Eq. (22)] The exponents γ_j are said to be “determined by the dimension,” but no explicit formula or reference is given. The notation ⟨C_{1⋯k}⟩ is also used without definition in this context.
  4. [§3.6] “the unimodular functor V” appears to be a typo for “the modular functor V.” This occurs in the first sentence of the fourth paragraph.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

Theorem 2 is not derived: the TQNN–amplituhedron 'correspondence' is created by a q-matching ansatz and by postulating the tetrahedron/positroid-cell map (37), then restated as a theorem.

  1. self definitional [Section 4.5, Eq. (36), and Introduction's summary of the argument]
    "the canonical form Ω(3)n,k can be expressed as ... where the exponents aij define a quantum torus algebra with relations x_i x_j = q^{2ϵ_ij} x_j x_i, matching the deformation parameter q in the Turaev-Viro model when ϵ_ij is the skew-symmetric form defining the cluster algebra."

    The 'correspondence' between the amplituhedron canonical form and the TV model is produced by identifying the formal cluster-algebra deformation parameter q with the TV deformation parameter q. The paper writes the amplituhedron canonical form with a quantum torus relation x_i x_j = q^{2ϵ_ij} x_j x_i and then says this is 'matching the deformation parameter q in the Turaev-Viro model when ϵ_ij is the skew-symmetric form defining the cluster algebra.' This is a definitional match: the amplituhedron literature's q is a quantization parameter of a cluster algebra, while TV's q is a root of unity from U_q(sl(2)); no argument shows that the skew-symmetric form ϵ_ij turns one into the other. The claimed resemblance is created by the choice of q, and Theorem 2 is then presented as its consequence

  2. self definitional [Section 4.5, Theorem 2 and Eq. (37)]
    "Since the Turaev-Viro model is incorporated into a TQNN for UQC (Theorem 1), the above discussion and details, together with those of §2 and §3, can be summarized by: Theorem 2. Within a TQNN, a UQC corresponds to a scattering process with amplitudes given by an amplituhedron, and conversely. Via this correspondence, we can postulates maps TV tetraheda⇄postitroid (cells) polytopes (37) as maps of cell-complexes."

    The theorem is introduced as a summary of 'the above discussion', but the discussion consists of structural analogies; the only constructive content that would substantiate the theorem is the map (37), which is explicitly 'postulated' after the theorem is stated. The asserted correspondence is therefore not derived from TQNN or amplituhedron theory; it is stipulated via the very maps the theorem needs to guarantee. No dictionary is given from TQNN data (triangulation, boundary spin labels, level k, mapping-class element) to amplituhedron data (n,k,Z), and no check is made that a tetrahedron-to-positroid-cell map is invariant under the Pachner moves on which the TV state sum's well-definedness rests. Thus Theorem 2 reduces to its own postulate.

full rationale

The TQNN/UQC part of the paper (Theorem 1) is not circular: it leans on external results of Freedman, Kitaev, Larsen, Wang and on the standard RT/TV relation, with self-citations playing only auxiliary expository roles. The problematic part is the new amplituhedron claim. Section 4.5 assembles analogies between TV tetrahedra and positroid cells, 6j recursion and BCFW recursion, and q-deformations, then states Theorem 2. No concrete, well-defined map from a TQNN's triangulation, boundary spin-network labels, level k, or mapping-class-group element to the external data (n,k,Z) of an amplituhedron is given. The only constructive step is Eq. (37), where the maps are 'postulated'; a theorem cannot be supported by postulating the very maps that constitute its conclusion. Likewise, Eq. (36) manufactures the correspondence by declaring the cluster-algebra q to 'match' the TV deformation parameter, a choice rather than a derivation. Section 5's admission that unique amplituhedra require unproven unique amplitudes further shows the central claim is conditional and unsupported, though that is a correctness limitation rather than circularity. Because the central claim reduces, by construction, to a q-matching and a postulated map, the circularity score is 7; the externally grounded TQNN/UQC portion prevents a higher score, and the paper does not rely on a self-citation chain to force the amplituhedron result.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that generic quantum processes have well-defined amplitudes, which the paper itself flags as open. The alleged correspondence is built on a hand-chosen identification of deformation parameters and a postulated map between cell complexes. The TQNN-UQC part is grounded in prior literature, including some of the authors' own work.

free parameters (1)
  • Identification of q in TV model with q in amplituhedron cluster algebra = q (deformation parameter, value e^{π i /5} for UQC)
    The correspondence in Section 4.5 is built by matching the Turaev-Viro deformation parameter with the quantum cluster algebra coordinate ring of the amplituhedron. This matching is chosen by hand to make the analogy work; without it the alleged formal correspondence has no content.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Any measurable physical process can be interpreted as computation (from [13]).
    Used in Section 1 to argue that any quantum process can be treated as scattering, which underlies the claim that amplituhedra apply to generic quantum processes.
  • domain assumption TQNNs simulate the Turaev-Viro invariant (from [23]).
    Used in Theorem 1 to claim TQNNs provide quantum processes for UQC; the proof cites the authors' own prior work.
  • standard math The RT modular functor for U_q(sl(2)) at q=e^{πi/5} is universal for quantum computation ([83]).
    External result from Freedman-Larsen-Wang; used as a black box in Theorem 1.
  • ad hoc to paper There exists a map between TV tetrahedra and amplituhedron positroid cells as cell complexes (eq. 37).
    The paper states 'we can postulates maps' in Section 4.5; this is a postulate that constitutes the alleged correspondence in Theorem 2.
invented entities (1)
  • Amplituhedra for generic quantum processes
    purpose: Geometric representation of amplitudes of arbitrary computations within TQNNs, proposed to extend the SYM amplituhedron.
    The paper does not construct these objects or provide a falsifiable handle; it only argues for their existence by analogy. The authors themselves note in Section 5 that well-defined amplitudes are required, which is not guaranteed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Amplituhedra for generic quantum processes via the TQNN representation of UQC." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CDCX7CAF

@misc{pith2026250919772,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Amplituhedra for generic quantum processes via the TQNN representation of UQC},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CDCX7CAF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.19772}
}
read the original abstract

We study the relationship between computation and scattering both operationally (hence phenomenologically) and formally. We develop a representation of universal quantum computation (UQC) within the formalism of topological quantum neural networks (TQNNs), using the Reshetikhin-Turaev and Turaev-Viro models to show how TQNNs implement quantum error-correcting codes. We then exhibit a formal correspondence between TQNNs and amplituhedra to support the existence of amplituhedra for representing generic quantum processes. This construction shows how amplituhedra are geometric representations of underlying topological structures. We conclude by pointing to applications areas enabled by these results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.19772 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Process to obtain a handle decomposition of a 3-manifold where a tetrahedron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The spine dual to a tetrahedron is fattened to a handlebody [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Handlebody component with δ curves and Ω elements represented 3.5 The chain mail and TV-invariants The key relation between the chain-mail invariant and the TV invariant, which will later use to relate universal quantum computing and TQNNs, is that given a triangulation T of M used to compute T V (M), we can obtain a handlebody decomposition of M by considering the dual triangulation T ∗ of T. The associated chain-m… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

159 extracted references · 9 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Feynman, R. P. Simulating physics with computers.Int. J. Theor. Phys.21 (1982), 467–488

    1982

  2. [2]

    Universal quantum simulations.Science273 (1996), 1073–1078

    Lloyd, S. Universal quantum simulations.Science273 (1996), 1073–1078

    1996

  3. [3]

    and Huang, Y.-t.Scattering Amplitudes in Gauge Theory and Gravity

    Elvang, H. and Huang, Y.-t.Scattering Amplitudes in Gauge Theory and Gravity. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge UK, 2015

    2015

  4. [4]

    Henn, J. M. and Plefka, J. C.Scattering Amplitudes in Gauge Theories. Lecture Notes in Physics 883, Springer Heidelberg-New York (2014), 1–195

    2014

  5. [5]

    P., Lee, K

    Jordan, S. P., Lee, K. S. M. and Preskill, J. Quantum computation of scattering in scalar quantum field theories.Quantum Information and Computation14 (2014), 1014–1080

    2014

  6. [6]

    A., Quaglioni, S., Pederiva, F

    Turro, F., Wendt, K. A., Quaglioni, S., Pederiva, F. and Roggero, A. Evalua- tion of phase shifts for non-relativistic elastic scattering using quantum computers. arXiv:2407.04155v2 [quant-ph]. 32

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Nielsen, M. A. and Chuang, I. L.Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge Univ. Press. 2000

    2000

  8. [8]

    Shor, P. W. Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring. Proc. 35th Ann. Sympos. on Found. Comp. Sci., Santa Fe NM (1994), 124–134

    1994

Show all 159 references
  1. [9]

    and Milburn, G

    Knill, E., Laflamme, R. and Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum compu- tation with linear optics.Nature409 (2001), 46–52

    2001

  2. [10]

    M., Gosset, D

    Childs, A. M., Gosset, D. and Webb, Z. Universal computation by multiparticle quantum walk.Science339(6121) (2013), 791–794

    2013

  3. [11]

    and Thomas, N

    Bao, N., Hayden, P., Salton, G. and Thomas, N. Universal quantum computation by scattering in the Fermi-Hubbard model.New J. Phys.17 (2015), 093028

    2015

  4. [12]

    Consequences of nonclassical measurement for the algorithmic description of continuous dynamical systems.J

    Fields, C. Consequences of nonclassical measurement for the algorithmic description of continuous dynamical systems.J. Expt. Theor. Artif. Intell.1 (1989) 171-178

    1989

  5. [13]

    When does a physical system compute?Proc

    Horsman, C., Stepney, S., Wagner, R.C., and Kendon, V. When does a physical system compute?Proc. R. Soc. A470 (2014), 20140182

    2014

  6. [14]

    White, C. D. and White, M. J. Magic states of Top quarks.Phys. Rev. D110 (2024), 116016

    2024

  7. [15]

    and Trnka, J

    Arkani-Hamed, N. and Trnka, J. The Amplituhedron.J. High Energy Physics30 (2014), 30

    2014

  8. [16]

    Chitambar, E., Leung, D., Manˇ cinska, L., Ozols. M. and Winter, A. Everything you always wanted to know about LOCC (but were afraid to ask).Commun. Math. Phys. 328 (2014), 303-326

    2014

  9. [17]

    Fields, C., Glazebrook, J. F. and Marcian` o, A. Sequential measurements, topological quantum field theories, and topological quantum neural networks.Fortschr. Physik 70 (2022), 202200104

    2022

  10. [18]

    D., Rudolph, T

    Bartlett, S. D., Rudolph, T. and Spekkens, R. W. Reference frames, super-selection rules, and quantum information.Rev. Mod. Phys.79 (2007), 555-609

    2007

  11. [19]

    Atiyah, M. F. Topological quantum field theory.Publ. Math. IH ´ES68 (1988), 175– 186

    1988

  12. [20]

    Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle, and the universal quantum computer.Proc

    Deutsch, D. Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle, and the universal quantum computer.Proc. R. Soc. London A400 (1985), 97-117

    1985

  13. [21]

    Angular momentum: An approach to combinatorial space-time

    Penrose, R. Angular momentum: An approach to combinatorial space-time. In (T. Bastin ed.)Quantum Theory and Beyond, pp. 151–180. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cam- bridge UK, 1971. 33

    1971

  14. [22]

    The future of spin networks

    Smolin, L. The future of spin networks. (1997) arXiv:gr-qc/9702030

    1997 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Marcian` o, A., Chen, D., Fabrocini, F. et al. Quantum neural networks and topological quantum field theories.Neural Networks153 (2022), 164–178

    2022

  16. [24]

    Marcian` o, A., Zappala, E., Torda, T. et al. Deep neural networks as the semi- classical limit of topological quantumm neural networks: the problem of general- ization. arXiv:2210.13741v2, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    H., Kitaev, A

    Freedman, M. H., Kitaev, A. and Wang, Z. Simulation of topological field theories by quantum computers.. Comm. Math. Phys.227(3) (2002), 587–603

    2002

  18. [26]

    H., Kitaev, A., Larsen, M

    Freedman, M. H., Kitaev, A., Larsen, M. J. and Wang, Z. Topological quantum computation.Bull. Amer. Soc.40(1) (2002), 31–38

    2002

  19. [27]

    and Reichardt, B

    Koenig, R., Kuperberg, G. and Reichardt, B. W. Quantum computation with Turaev- Viro codes.Annals of Physics325 (2010), 2707–2749

    2010

  20. [28]

    Fields, C., Glazebrook, J. F. and Marcian` o, A. Communication protocols and QECCs from the perspective of TQFT, Part I: Constructing LOCC protocols and QECCs from TQFTs.Fortschr. Physik72 (2024), 202400049

    2024

  21. [29]

    and Marcian` o, A

    Fields, C. and Marcian` o, A. Holographic screens are classical information channels. Quant. Rep.2 (2019), 326–336

    2019

  22. [30]

    Fields, C., Glazebrook, J. F. and Marcian` o, A. The physical meaning of the Holo- graphic Principle.Quanta11 (2022), 72-96

    2022

  23. [31]

    Fields, C.; Glazebrook, J. F. Information flow in context-dependent hierarchical Bayesian inference.J. Expt. Theor. Artif. Intell.34 (2022), 111–142

    2022

  24. [32]

    and Glazebrook, J

    Fields, C. and Glazebrook, J. F. Separability, contextuality, and the quantum Frame Problem.Int. J. Theor. Phys.62 (2023), 159

    2023

  25. [33]

    F., Marcian` o, A

    Fields, C., Glazebrook, J. F., Marcian` o, A. and Zappala, E. ER=EPR is an opera- tional theorem.Phys. Lett. B860 (2025), 139150

    2025

  26. [34]

    Mikusch, M., Barbado, L. C. and Brukner, ˘C. Transformations of spin in quantum reference frames.Phys. Rev. Res.3 (2021), 043138, 12pp

    2021

  27. [35]

    and Loveridge, L

    Carette, T., G lowacki, J. and Loveridge, L. Operational quantum reference frames. Quantum(9) (2025), 1680

    2025

  28. [36]

    C., Girelli, F

    Palmer, M. C., Girelli, F. and Bartlett, S. D. Changing quantum reference frames. Phys. Rev. A89 (2014), 052121

    2014

  29. [37]

    and Brukner, ˘C

    Giacomini, F., Castro-Ruiz, E. and Brukner, ˘C. Relativisic quantum reference frames: the operational meaning of spin.Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019), 090404. 34

    2019

  30. [38]

    and Brukner, ˘C

    Giacomini, F., Castro-Ruiz, E. and Brukner, ˘C. Quantum mechanics and the covari- ance of physical laws in quantum reference frames.Nat. Commun.10 (2019), 1

    2019

  31. [39]

    and Galley, T

    de la Hamette, A.-C. and Galley, T. D. Quantum reference frames for general sym- metry groups.Quantum4 (2020), 367

    2020

  32. [40]

    On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsprob- lem.Proc

    Turing, A. On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsprob- lem.Proc. London Math. Soc.s2-42(1) (1937), 230–265

    1937

  33. [41]

    and Seligman, J.Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed Systems (Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, 44)

    Barwise, J. and Seligman, J.Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed Systems (Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, 44). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997

    1997

  34. [42]

    and Glazebrook, J

    Fields, C. and Glazebrook, J. F. A mosaic of Chu spaces and Channel Theory I: Category-theoretic concepts and tools.J. Expt. Theor. Artif. Intell.31 (2019), 177- 213

    2019

  35. [43]

    P and Welling, M

    Kingma, D. P and Welling, M. An Introduction to variational autoencoders.Foun- dations and Trends in Machine Learning12(4) (2019), 307–392

    2019

  36. [44]

    Chu spaces.School on Category Theory and Applications (Coimbra 1999), Vol

    Pratt, V. Chu spaces.School on Category Theory and Applications (Coimbra 1999), Vol. 21 ofTextos Mat. S´ er. B, University of Coimbra, Coimbra. (pp. 39–100), 1999

    1999

  37. [45]

    Chu spaces from the representational viewpoint.Ann

    Pratt, V. Chu spaces from the representational viewpoint.Ann. Pure Appl. Logic96 (1999), 319–333

    1999

  38. [46]

    Baez, J. C. Spin network states in gauge theory.Adv. Math.117 (1996), 253–272

    1996

  39. [47]

    and Suresh, D

    Vaid, D. and Suresh, D. Coherent states and particle scattering in loop quantum gravity.Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022), 723

    2022

  40. [48]

    Basu S. K. Transformations on directed graphs.J. Comb. Theor.9 (1970), 244–256

    1970

  41. [49]

    Cooper, D. C. Theoretical results concerning programs regarded as directed graphs. In (D. Mitchic, ed.)Proc. Second Machine Intelligence ConferenceEdinburgh, July

  42. [50]

    and van der Veen, R

    Garoufalidis, S. and van der Veen, R. (with an appendix by D. Zagier).Geom. Topol. 17 (2013), 1–37

    2013

  43. [51]

    Garcia-Escartin, J. C. and Chamorro-Posada, P. Universal quantum computation with the orbital angular momentum of a single photon.Journal of Optics13(6) (2010), 064022

    2010

  44. [52]

    Reck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H. J. and Bertani. P. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator.Phys. Rev. Lett.73(1) (1994), 58–62

    1994

  45. [53]

    Experimental realization of any discrete operator

    Svozil, K. Experimental realization of any discrete operator. (1996) arXiv:quant- ph/9612010v1 35

    1996

  46. [54]

    and Sun, C

    Yang, S., Song, Z. and Sun, C. Beam splitter for spin waves in quantum spin network. Eur. Phys. J.52 (2006), 377–381

    2006

  47. [55]

    S., Messina, A

    Grimaudo, R., Magalh˜ aese de Castro, A. S., Messina, A. and Valenti, D. Spin-chain star systems: entangling multiple chains of spin qubits.Fortschr. Physik70 (2022), 2200042

    2022

  48. [56]

    and Song, Z

    Jin, L. and Song, Z. Generation of GHZ and W states for stationary qubits in spin network via resonance scattering.Phys. Rev. A79 (2009), 04234

    2009

  49. [57]

    Quantum computational networks.Proc

    Deutsch, D. Quantum computational networks.Proc. Royal Soc. London A425 (1989), 73–90

    1989

  50. [58]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons.Annals of Physics303 (1977), 2-30

    Kitaev, A. Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons.Annals of Physics303 (1977), 2-30

    1977

  51. [59]

    F.The Geometry and Physics of Knots

    Atiyah, M. F.The Geometry and Physics of Knots. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cam- bridge UK, 1990

    1990

  52. [60]

    and Regge, T

    Ponzano, G. and Regge, T. Semiclassical limit of Racah coefficients. In (F. Bloch, ed.)Spectroscopic and group theoretical methods in physics. North Holland, 1968

    1968

  53. [61]

    and Viro, O

    Turaev, V. and Viro, O. State sum invariants of 3-manifolds and quantum 6j symbols. Topology31 (1992), 865–902

    1992

  54. [62]

    Foxon, T. J. Spin networks, Turaev-Viro theory and the loop representation.Class. Quant. Grav.12 (1995), 951–964

    1995

  55. [63]

    Basis of the Ponzano-Regge-Turaev-Viro-Ooguri quantum gravity model is the loop representation basis.Phys

    Rovelli, C. Basis of the Ponzano-Regge-Turaev-Viro-Ooguri quantum gravity model is the loop representation basis.Phys. Rev. D48 (1993), 2702-2707

    1993

  56. [64]

    On Witten’s 3-maiifold invariants, preprint (1991), https://canyon23.net/math/1991TQFTNotes.pdf

    Walker, K. On Witten’s 3-maiifold invariants, preprint (1991), https://canyon23.net/math/1991TQFTNotes.pdf

    1991

  57. [65]

    Shadow links and face models of statistical mechanics.J

    Turaev, V. Shadow links and face models of statistical mechanics.J. Diff. Geom.36 (1992), 35–74

    1992

  58. [66]

    Barrett, J. W. and Westbury, B. W. Spherical categories.Adv. Math.143 (1999), 357–375

    1999

  59. [67]

    Skein theory and Turaev-Viro invariants.Topology34(4) (1995), 771–787

    Roberts, J. Skein theory and Turaev-Viro invariants.Topology34(4) (1995), 771–787

    1995

  60. [68]

    G.Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Manifolds

    Turaev, V. G.Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Manifolds. De Gruyter, Berlin DE, 2010

    2010

  61. [69]

    Turaev, Y. G. and Viro, O. Y. State sum invariants of 3-manifolds and quantum 6j-symbols.Topology31 (1992), 865–902. 36

    1992

  62. [70]

    and Turaev, V

    Reshetikhin, N. and Turaev, V. Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups.Invent. Math.103 (1991), 547–597

    1991

  63. [71]

    H., Lins, S

    Kauffman, L. H., Lins, S. Temperley-Lieb recoupling theory and invariants of 3- manifolds.Princeton University PressPrinceton NY, 1994

    1994

  64. [72]

    Lickorish, W. B. The skein method for three-manifold invariants,Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications02(02) (1993), 171–194

    1993

  65. [73]

    Lickorish, W. B. Skeins and handlebodies,Pacific J. Math.159 (1993), 337–349

    1993

  66. [74]

    Lickorish, W. B. R. A representation of orientable combinatorial 3-manifolds,Annals of Mathematics, 76 (3) (1962), 531–540

    1962

  67. [75]

    Wallace, A. H. Modifications and cobounding manifolds,Canadian Journal of Math- ematics, 12 (1960), 503–528

    1960

  68. [76]

    Quantum groups and subfactors of type B, C, and D,Communications in Mathematical Physics, 133(2) (1990), 383–432

    Wenzl, H. Quantum groups and subfactors of type B, C, and D,Communications in Mathematical Physics, 133(2) (1990), 383–432

    1990

  69. [77]

    and Zappal` a, E

    Lulli, M., Marcian` o, A. and Zappal` a, E. Exact Evaluation of Hexagonal Spin- Networks for Topological Quantum Neural Networks,Fortschritte der Physik, 73(6) (2025), e70005

    2025

  70. [78]

    Kirillov Jr, Alexander, String-net model of Turaev-Viro invariants arXiv preprint arXiv:1106.6033 2011

    2011 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Levin, M. A. and Wen, X.-G., String-net condensation: A physical mechanism for topological phases,Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics71 (2005), 045110

    2005

  72. [80]

    and Laflamme, R

    Knill, E. and Laflamme, R. Theory of quantum error-correcting codes.Phys. Rev. A 55 (1997), 900–911

    1997

  73. [81]

    and Wakui, M

    Kawahigashi, Y., Sato, N. and Wakui, M. (2 + 1)-dimensional topological quantum field theory and Dehn surgery formula for 3-manifold invariants.Adv. Math.195 (2005), 165–204

    2005

  74. [82]

    and Lo, C

    Alagic, G. and Lo, C. Quantum invariants of 3-manifolds and NP vs #P.Quantum Information and Computation17(1,2) (2017), 0125–0146

    2017

  75. [83]

    H., Larsen, M

    Freedman, M. H., Larsen, M. and Wang, Z. A modular functor which is universal for quantum computation,Communications in Mathematical Physics, 227 (2002), 605–622

    2002

  76. [84]

    Freedman, M. H. P/NP, and the quantum field computer.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95 (1998), 98–111. 37

    1998

  77. [85]

    and Post- nikov, A.Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes

    Arkani-Hamed, N., Bourjaily, J., Cachazo, F., Goncharov, A., Trnka, J. and Post- nikov, A.Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 2016

    2016

  78. [86]

    and Sturmfels, B

    Speyer, D. and Sturmfels, B. The tropical Grassmannian.Advances in Geometry4(3) (2004), 389–411

    2004

  79. [87]

    Ardila-Mantilla, F., The geometry of geometries: matroid theory, old and new, In, Proc. Int. Cong. Math.6 (2022), 4510-4541

    2022

  80. [88]

    , Recent developments in algebraic combinatorics, InIsrael Journal of Mathematics143.1 (2004), 317-339

    Stanley, R.P. , Recent developments in algebraic combinatorics, InIsrael Journal of Mathematics143.1 (2004), 317-339

    2004

  81. [89]

    Neukirch, J., Algebraic Number Theory, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2196-9701

  82. [90]

    and W¨ uthrich, C., Spacetime is as spacetime does, InStud

    Lam, V. and W¨ uthrich, C., Spacetime is as spacetime does, InStud. Hist. Phil. Sci. B64 (2018), 39-51

    2018

  83. [91]

    Travaglini, G., Brandhuber, A., Dorey, P., McLoughlin, T., Abreu, S., Bern, Z., Bjerrum-Bohr, N. E. J., Bl¨ umlein, J., Britto, R. and Carrasco, J. J. M.et al., The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes, InJ. Phys. A55, 44 (2022), 443001

    2022

  84. [92]

    M., Celestial Holography, [arXiv:2111.11392 [hep-th]]

    Pasterski, S., Pate, M., and Raclariu, A. M., Celestial Holography, [arXiv:2111.11392 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    and Trnka, J., Nonperturbative negative geometries: amplitudes at strong coupling and the amplituhedron, InJHEP03 (2022), 108

    Arkani-Hamed, N., Henn, J. and Trnka, J., Nonperturbative negative geometries: amplitudes at strong coupling and the amplituhedron, InJHEP03 (2022), 108

    2022

  86. [94]

    Bern, Z., and Trnka, J., Snowmass TF04 Report: Scattering Amplitudes and their Applications, [arXiv:2210.03146 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  87. [95]

    Topological Quantum Field Theory,Commun

    Witten, E. Topological Quantum Field Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.117 (1988), 353

    1988

  88. [96]

    and Thompson, G

    Birmingham, D., Blau, M., Rakowski, M. and Thompson, G. Geometry of topological field theory.Phys. Rept.209 (1991), 129–340

    1991

  89. [97]

    Differential geometry of Grassmann manifolds.Proc

    Wong, Y.-C. Differential geometry of Grassmann manifolds.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA57 (3), 589–594

  90. [98]

    M., Goresky

    Gelfand, I. M., Goresky. R. M., MacPherson, R. D. and Serganova, V. V. Combina- torial geometries, convex polyhedra, and Schubert cells.Adv. in Math.63(3) (1987), 301–316

    1987

  91. [99]

    and Postnikov, A

    Lam, T. and Postnikov, A. Alcoved polytopes I.Discrete and Combinatorial Geometry 38(3) (2007), 453-478

    2007

  92. [100]

    and Hynbida, J

    Dittrich, B. and Hynbida, J. Ising model from intertwiners.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Comb. Phys. Interact.3 (2016), 363–380. 38

    2016

  93. [101]

    and Zhang, Y

    Guevara, A. and Zhang, Y. Planar matrices and arrays of Feynman diagrams: poles for higherk.Commun. in Theor. Phys.76(4), 045001

  94. [102]

    and Williams, L

    Lukowski, T., Parisi, M. and Williams, L. K. The positive tropical Grassmannian, the hypersimplex, and them= 2 amplituhedron.Int. Math. Res. Notes19 (2023), 16778–16836

    2023

  95. [103]

    and Williams, L

    Parisi, M., Sherman-Bennett, M. and Williams, L. K. Them= 2 amplituhedron and the hypersimplex: signs, clusters, tilings, Eulerian numbers.Comm. Amer. Math. Soc.3 (2023), 329–399

    2023

  96. [104]

    and Williams, L

    Tsukerman, E. and Williams, L. Bruhat interval polytopes.Adv. in Math.285 (2015), 766–810

    2015

  97. [105]

    and Postnikov, A

    Lam, T. and Postnikov, A. Polypositroids.Forum of Mathematics, Sigma12 (2024), 42

    2024

  98. [106]

    Positive Grassmannian and polyhedral subdivions.Proc

    Postnikov, A. Positive Grassmannian and polyhedral subdivions.Proc. Int. Cong. Math. (2018). World Scientific, April (2019), 3181–3211

    2018

  99. [107]

    Rinc´ on,, F

    Ardila, F. Rinc´ on,, F. and Williams, L. Positroids, non-crossing partitions, and posi- tively oriented manifolds. In (C. Clivans, ed.)26th International Conference on For- mal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics (FPSAC), pp. 655–666. DePaul Univ., Chicago IL (2014)

    2014

  100. [109]

    and Parisi, M

    Damgaard, D., Ferro, L., /Lukowski, T. and Parisi, M. The momentum amplituhe- dron.JHEP08 (2019), 042

    2019

  101. [110]

    Cambridge Univ

    Hatcher, A.Algebraic Topology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge UK, 2002

    2002

  102. [111]

    Galashin, P., Karp, S. N. and Lam, T. The totally nonnegative Grassmannian is a ball.Adv. Math.397 (2022), 108–123

    2022

  103. [112]

    Galashin, P., Karp, S. N. and Lam, T. Regularity theorem for totally nonnegative flag varities.J. Amer. Math. Soc.35 (2022), 513–579

    2022

  104. [113]

    and He, X

    Bao, H. and He, X. Them= 2 amplituhedron. (2019) arXiv:1909.06015v2

    2019 arXiv

  105. [114]

    and Huang, Y

    Elvang, H. and Huang, Y. T., Scattering Amplitudes in Gauge Theory and Gravity, Cambridge University Press (2015)

    2015

  106. [115]

    and Suresh, D., Coherent states and particle scattering in loop quantum gravity, InEur

    Vaid, D. and Suresh, D., Coherent states and particle scattering in loop quantum gravity, InEur. Phys. J. C82, 8, (2022), 723

    2022

  107. [116]

    Quantum Grav.4 (1987), 1565

    Barrett, J.W., The geometry of classical Regge calculus, InClass. Quantum Grav.4 (1987), 1565. 39

    1987

  108. [117]

    Freidel, L., Group field theory: An Overview, InInt. J. Theor. Phys.44 (2005), 1769-1783

    2005

  109. [118]

    Press (2004)

    Rovelli, C.Quantum Gravity.Cambridge Univ. Press (2004)

    2004

  110. [119]

    and Vidotto, F.Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity.Cambridge Univ

    Rovelli, C. and Vidotto, F.Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity.Cambridge Univ. Press (2014)

    2014

  111. [120]

    Gresnigt, N., Marciano, A., and Zappala, E., Dynamical emergence ofSU q(2) from the regularization of (2 + 1)Dgravity with a cosmological constant, InPhys. Rev. D 107, 4 (2023), 046018

    2023

  112. [121]

    and Gordon, R

    Schulten, K. and Gordon, R. G., Exact Recursive Evaluation of 3J and 6J Coefficients for Quantum Mechanical Coupling of Angular Momenta, InJ. Math. Phys.16 (1975), 1961-1970

    1975

  113. [122]

    and Witten, E., Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory, InPhys

    Britto, R., Cachazo, F., Feng, B. and Witten, E., Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory, InPhys. Rev. Lett.94 (2005), 181602

    2005

  114. [123]

    and Martin-Dussaud, P., Causal Structure in Spin Foams, InUniverse 10, 4 (2024), 181

    Bianchi, E. and Martin-Dussaud, P., Causal Structure in Spin Foams, InUniverse 10, 4 (2024), 181

    2024

  115. [124]

    High Energ

    Skinner, D., A Direct Proof of BCFW Recursion for Twistor-Strings, InJ. High Energ. Phys.01 (2011), 072

    2011

  116. [125]

    and Trnka, J

    Arkani-Hamed, N., Thomas, H. and Trnka, J. Unwinding the amplituhedron in binary, InJ. High Energ. Phys.01 (2018), 016

    2018

  117. [126]

    H., Ferro, L., Lukowski, T

    Damgaard, P. H., Ferro, L., Lukowski, T. and Moerman, R., The momentum ampli- tuhedron, InJ. High Energ. Phys.42 (2019)

    2019

  118. [127]

    and Moerman, R., From momentum amplituhedron bound- aries toamplitude singularities and back, InJ

    Ferro, L., Lukowski, T. and Moerman, R., From momentum amplituhedron bound- aries toamplitude singularities and back, InJ. High Energ. Phys.07, 7 (2020), 201

    2020

  119. [128]

    and Lam, T

    Arkani-Hamed, N., Bai, Y. and Lam, T. Positive geometries and canonical forms,J. High Energ. Phys.11 (2017), 039

    2017

  120. [129]

    and Reshetikhin, N

    Cattaneo, A.S., Mnev, P. and Reshetikhin, N. Perturbative quantum gauge theories on manifolds with boundary, InCommun. Math. Phys.357 (2018), 631-730

    2018

  121. [130]

    and Paquette, N.M

    Costello, K. and Paquette, N.M. Twisted holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.27 (2023), 1-145

    2023

  122. [131]

    Postnikov, A., Total positivity, Grassmannians, and networks, [arXiv:math/0609764 [math.CO]]

    arXiv

  123. [132]

    Twistors and amplitudes.Phil

    Hodges, A. Twistors and amplitudes.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A373 (2015), 20140248. 40

    2015

  124. [133]

    and Goncharov, A.B

    Fock, V.V. and Goncharov, A.B. Cluster ensembles, quantization and the dilogarithm. Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er.42 (2009), 865–930

    2009

  125. [134]

    How device-independent approaches change the meaning of physical theory.Stud

    Grinbaum, A. How device-independent approaches change the meaning of physical theory.Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys.58 (2017), 22–30

    2017

  126. [135]

    F., Marcian` o, A

    Fields, C., Glazebrook, J. F., Marcian` o, A. and Zappala, E. Whether a quantum com- putation employs nonlocal resources is operationally undecidable.EPL151 (2025), 48001

    2025

  127. [136]

    Cie´ slinski, P., de la Hamette, A.-C

    Cepollaro, C., Akil, A. Cie´ slinski, P., de la Hamette, A.-C. and Brukner, ˇC. Sum of entanglement and subsystem coherence is invariant under quantum reference frame transformations.Phys. Rev. Lett.135 (2025), 010201

    2025

  128. [137]

    Barb´ on, J. L. F., Martin-Garcia, J. and Sasieta, M. Proof of a momentum/complexity correspondence.Physical Review D102 (2020), 101901(R)

    2020

  129. [138]

    G¨ odel and the End of Physics

    Hawking, S. G¨ odel and the End of Physics. Lecture at the Dirac Centennial Cel- ebration. Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 2002. Available online: https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/events/strings02/dirac/ hawking.html (accessed on 13 January 2024)

    2002

  130. [139]

    A., Dreiner, H

    Abel, S. A., Dreiner, H. K., Sengupta, R. and Ubaldi, L. Colliders are testing neither locality via Bell’s inequality nor entanglement versus non-entanglement. arXiv:2507.15949v1 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  131. [140]

    Rinaldi, E., Han, X., Hassan, M. et al. Matrix-model simulation using quantum computing, deep learning, and lattice Monte Carlo.PRX Quantum3 (2022), 010324

    2022

  132. [141]

    Hardy, A., Mukhopadhyay, P., Alam, M S. et al. Optimized quantum simulation algorithms for scalar quantum field theories. (2024) arXiv:2407.13819v1 [quant-ph]

    2024

  133. [142]

    and Rothstein, I

    Goldberger, W. and Rothstein, I. Z. Virtual Hawking Radiation.Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020), 211301

    2020

  134. [143]

    Baez, J. C. An introduction to spin foam models of BF theory and quantum gravity. In ( Gausterer, H., Pittner, L. and Grosse, H. eds.)Geometry and Quantum Physics pp. 25–93. Lecture Notes in Physics 543. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2000

    2000

  135. [144]

    and Livine, E

    Bonzom, V., Costantino, F. and Livine, E. R. Duality between spin networks and the 2D Ising model.Commun. Math. Phys.344(2) (2016), 531–579

    2016

  136. [145]

    and Tessler, R

    Even-Zohar, C., Lakrec, T. and Tessler, R. J. The BCFW triangulation of the ampli- tuhedron. In (Davis, ed.)Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics,S´ eminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire89B Article 47 (2023), arXiv:2112.02703. 41

    2023

  137. [146]

    and Glazebrook, J

    Fields, C. and Glazebrook, J. F. Representing measurement as a thermodynamic symmetry breaking.Symmetry12 (2020), 810

    2020

  138. [147]

    F., and Marcian` o, A

    Fields, C., Glazebrook, J. F., and Marcian` o, A. Reference frame induced symmetry breaking on holographic screens.Symmetry13 (2021), 408

    2021

  139. [148]

    Fields, C., Glazebrook, J. F. and Marcian` o, A. Communication protocols and QECCs from the perspective of TQFT, Part II: QECCs as spacetimes.Fortschr. Physik72 (2024), 202400050

    2024

  140. [149]

    Friston, K., Glazebrook, J

    Fields, C., Fabrocini, F. Friston, K., Glazebrook, J. F., Hazan, H., Levin, L. and Marcian` o, A. Control flow in active inference systems. Part I: Classical and quantum formulations of active inference.IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological, and Multi-Scale Communications...

    2023

  141. [150]

    and Hnybida, J

    Freidel, L. and Hnybida, J. On the exact evaluation of spin networks.J. Math. Phys. 54(11) (2014), 112301

    2014

  142. [151]

    and Pylyavskyy, P

    Galashin, P. and Pylyavskyy, P. Ising model and the positive orthogonal Grassmanian. Duke Math. J.69(10) (2020), 1877–1942

    2020

  143. [152]

    Gradute Texts in Mathematics 221, Springer Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 2003

    Gr¨ unbaum, B.Convex Polytopes2nd edn. Gradute Texts in Mathematics 221, Springer Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 2003

    2003

  144. [153]

    N., Williams, L

    Karp, S. N., Williams, L. K. and Zhang, Y. X. Decompostiosn of amplituhedra.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Comb. Phys Interact.7(3) (2020), 303–363

    2020

  145. [154]

    and Puchta, J

    Kisielowski, M., Lewandowski, J. and Puchta, J. Feynman diagramatic approach to spinfoams.Classical and Quantum Gravity29(1) (2011), 15009

    2011

  146. [155]

    K., Wang, E

    Li, T., Lai, W. K., Wang, E. and Xing, H. Scattering amplitude from quantum computing with reduction formula.Phys. Rev. D109 (2024), 036025

    2024

  147. [156]

    and Susskind, L

    Maldacena, J. and Susskind, L. Cool horizons for entangled black holes.Fortschr. Physik61 (2013), 781-811

    2013

  148. [157]

    and Rovelli, C

    Reisenberger, M. and Rovelli, C. Spin foams as Feynman diagrams.2001: A Rela- tivistic Spacetime Odysseypp. 431–448, World Scientific Press, 2003

    2001

  149. [158]

    Copenhagen vs Everett, teleportation, and ER=EPR.Forschr

    Susskind, L. Copenhagen vs Everett, teleportation, and ER=EPR.Forschr. Physik 64(6-7) (2016), 551–564

    2016

  150. [159]

    M.Lectures on Polytopes

    Ziegler, G. M.Lectures on Polytopes. Springer and Busimess Media, 2012. 42

    2012

  151. [1966]

    Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh UK, 1966

    1966

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.