pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.24339 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-29 · 🌀 gr-qc

de Sitter Corrections to Gravitational Wave Memory

Anthi Voulgari Revof , Shubhanshu Tiwari This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 13:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesmemory effectsde Sitter spacetimecosmological constantBondi-Sachs formalismdisplacement memoryspin memoryflux-balance relations
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Gravitational wave memory effects acquire order-Lambda corrections in de Sitter spacetime.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper computes the displacement and spin memory effects for gravitational waves in de Sitter spacetime instead of flat spacetime. It derives flux-balance relations that include leading corrections proportional to the cosmological constant Lambda, written directly in terms of the cosmological constant and the Bondi-Sachs data. A sympathetic reader would care because our universe has a small positive cosmological constant, so the corrections represent the first step toward describing how permanent geometric shifts from waves behave in actual cosmology rather than the idealized flat limit. The work concludes that these Lambda corrections remain far too small for detection by any current or planned observatories.

Core claim

At leading order the flux-balance relations for displacement and spin memory acquire corrections of order Lambda directly in terms of the cosmological constant and Bondi-Sachs data, with the cosmological constant corrections for the leading term being of order Lambda for both displacement and spin memory.

What carries the argument

An adapted Bondi-Sachs framework in de Sitter spacetime that extracts the leading-order corrections while retaining the same radiation data as the flat-space case.

Load-bearing premise

The leading de Sitter corrections can be isolated inside an adapted Bondi-Sachs coordinate system that keeps the radiation data identical to the flat-space case.

What would settle it

A complete asymptotic analysis of gravitational waves in de Sitter space that computes the memory without assuming the flat radiation data would produce a different order-Lambda correction or none at all.

read the original abstract

In this work, we compute the gravitational wave displacement and spin memory effects in de Sitter spacetime. Gravitational waves in asymptotically flat spacetimes are described by the Bondi-Sachs framework, where radiation at null infinity is tied to the BMS group, and memory appears as permanent changes in the geometry. This formalism becomes more complicated when asymptotic flatness is not guaranteed. With a positive cosmological constant, future infinity is spacelike rather than null, and the decay of the fields differs qualitatively from the flat case. We calculate the leading order corrections due to de Sitter spacetime. At leading order, this yields flux-balance relations for displacement and spin memory directly in terms of the cosmological constant and Bondi-Sachs data. We find that the cosmological constant corrections for the leading term are of the order {\Lambda} for both displacement and spin memory. These corrections are, as expected, too small to be detected by any current or future gravitational wave observatories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the leading-order de Sitter corrections to gravitational wave displacement and spin memory. Adapting the Bondi-Sachs framework to positive cosmological constant, it derives modified flux-balance relations that include O(Λ) terms expressed directly in terms of the cosmological constant and standard Bondi-Sachs radiation data (news and shear). The corrections are stated to be too small for detection by current or future observatories.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies an explicit perturbative result for memory effects in cosmological backgrounds, extending the flat-space BMS framework in a controlled way. The direct expression of corrections in terms of Λ and unmodified Bondi-Sachs quantities is a clear strength and could serve as a baseline for future studies of gravitational waves on de Sitter.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4] §4 (derivation of the flux-balance relations): The central claim requires that the leading radiation data remain identical to the flat-space case at O(Λ). The manuscript must explicitly verify that Λ-induced changes to the Weyl fall-offs, the definition of future infinity, and the allowed asymptotic expansions begin only at O(Λ²) or higher; otherwise the quoted O(Λ) pieces may mix with redefinitions of the asymptotic data. A detailed order-by-order accounting of the metric and curvature components in the perturbative expansion around Λ = 0 is needed to support this.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the notation 'order {Λ}' is a LaTeX artifact and should be corrected to 'order Λ'.
  2. [Introduction] Consider adding a short paragraph contrasting the present perturbative approach with existing non-perturbative treatments of asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and positive evaluation of the significance of our results. The single major comment concerns the need for an explicit order-by-order verification in the perturbative expansion around flat space. We have revised the manuscript to supply this accounting and believe the central claims are now more rigorously supported.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (derivation of the flux-balance relations): The central claim requires that the leading radiation data remain identical to the flat-space case at O(Λ). The manuscript must explicitly verify that Λ-induced changes to the Weyl fall-offs, the definition of future infinity, and the allowed asymptotic expansions begin only at O(Λ²) or higher; otherwise the quoted O(Λ) pieces may mix with redefinitions of the asymptotic data. A detailed order-by-order accounting of the metric and curvature components in the perturbative expansion around Λ = 0 is needed to support this.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit order-by-order accounting strengthens the derivation. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection to §4 that expands the metric, Weyl scalars, and asymptotic data in powers of Λ. We show that the leading Bondi-Sachs radiation quantities (news function and shear) receive no O(Λ) corrections; modifications to the Weyl fall-offs and the allowed expansions of the metric components begin only at O(Λ²). The O(Λ) contributions to the flux-balance relations arise solely from the modified geometry of future infinity and the adjusted surface terms in the de Sitter-adapted integrals, without redefining the leading radiation data. This perturbative analysis confirms that the quoted corrections remain the leading ones. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper computes leading-order de Sitter corrections to displacement and spin memory flux-balance laws as explicit O(Lambda) terms expressed in terms of the cosmological constant and standard Bondi-Sachs radiation data. No quoted equations or steps reduce the claimed corrections to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain by construction. The perturbative expansion around Lambda=0 is presented as independent of the target result, with the modeling choice of adapted Bondi-Sachs data stated without circular reduction. This is a normal non-finding for a calculation that introduces an external parameter (Lambda) into an existing asymptotic framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumptions of general relativity with positive cosmological constant together with an adapted asymptotic expansion; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption General relativity with positive cosmological constant governs the spacetime
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the background for the de Sitter corrections.
  • domain assumption An adapted Bondi-Sachs framework remains valid at leading order in Lambda
    The calculation of flux-balance relations presupposes this modeling choice.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5693 in / 1347 out tokens · 32367 ms · 2026-05-18T13:19:12.118248+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    edu/abs/1974SvA....18...17Z/abstract REFERENCES18 Table C1: Nonzero coefficient polynomials (in the explicit operatorð ¯ð) multiplying the bilinears of Eq

    Zel’dovich Y B and Polnarev A G 1974Soviet Astronomy1817–23 original in Astronomicheskii Zhurnal, 51 (1974) 30–39 URLhttps://ui.adsabs.harvard. edu/abs/1974SvA....18...17Z/abstract REFERENCES18 Table C1: Nonzero coefficient polynomials (in the explicit operatorð ¯ð) multiplying the bilinears of Eq. (C.7). Type (m, n, q, s) Bilinear structure Coefficient p...

    work page 1974

  2. [2]

    Braginskii V B and Grishchuk L P 1985Zhurnal Eksperimentalnoi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki89744–750 URLhttps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ZhETF..89. .744B

    work page

  3. [3]

    org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1486

    Christodoulou D 1991Physical Review Letters671486–1489 URLhttps://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1486

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.1486

  4. [4]

    Mari and J

    Lasky P D, Thrane E, Levin Y, Blackman J and Chen Y 2016Physical Review Letters117ISSN 1079-7114 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. REFERENCES19 117.061102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett

  5. [5]

    Inchausp´ e H, Gasparotto S, Blas D, Heisenberg L, Zosso J and Tiwari S 2025Phys. Rev. D111(4) 044044 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD. 111.044044

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd

  6. [6]

    Grant A M and Nichols D A 2023Physical Review D107ISSN 2470-0029 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.064056

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.064056

  7. [7]

    Bondi H, van der Burg M G J and Metzner A W K 1962Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A26921–52 URLhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa. 1962.0161

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa 1962

  8. [8]

    Sachs R K 1962Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A270103–126 URL https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1962.0206

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.0206 1962

  9. [9]

    Strominger A and Zhiboedov A 2014 Gravitational memory, bms supertranslations and soft theorems (Preprint1411.5745) URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1411. 5745

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Pasterski S, Strominger A and Zhiboedov A 2016Journal of High Energy Physics 2016ISSN 1029-8479 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2016)053

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2016)053 2016

  11. [12]

    Favata M 2010Class. Quant. Grav.27084036 (Preprint1003.3486) URLhttps: //iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084036

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084036

  12. [13]

    Flanagan ´E ´E and Nichols D A 2015Phys. Rev. D92084057 URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084057

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.084057

  13. [14]

    nature.com/articles/327123a0

    Braginsky V B and Thorne K S 1987Nature327123–125 URLhttps://www. nature.com/articles/327123a0

    work page

  14. [15]

    Mitman Ket al.2024Class. Quant. Grav.41223001 (Preprint2405.08868) URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6382/ad83c2

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad83c2

  15. [16]

    Weinberg S 1989Rev. Mod. Phys.611–23 URLhttps://journals.aps.org/rmp/ abstract/10.1103/RevModPhys.61.1

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.61.1

  16. [17]

    Riess A Get al.1998The Astronomical Journal1161009–1038 URLhttps: //iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/300499

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/300499

  17. [18]

    Perlmutter Set al.1999The Astrophysical Journal517565–586 URLhttps: //iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/307221

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/307221

  18. [19]

    Mueller E M, Rezaie M, Percival W J, Ross A Jet al.2021 The clustering of galaxies in the completed sdss-iv extended baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey: Primordial non-gaussianity in fourier space URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2106. 13725

    work page 2021

  19. [20]

    Aghanim N, Akrami Y, Ashdown M, Aumont Jet al.2020Astronomy & Astrophysics641A6 URLhttps://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2020/09/ aa33910-18/aa33910-18.html REFERENCES20

    work page 2020

  20. [21]

    Ashtekar A, Bonga B and Kesavan A 2014Classical and Quantum Gravity 32025004 ISSN 1361-6382 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/ 025004

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/

  21. [22]

    Bonga B and Prabhu K 2020Phys. Rev. D102104043 (Preprint2009.01243) URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.104043

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.104043

  22. [23]

    Tolish A and Wald R M 2016Physical Review D94ISSN 2470-0029 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.044009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.044009

  23. [24]

    Enriquez-Rojo M and Schroeder T 2023JHEP01011 URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1007/JHEP01(2023)011

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2023)011 2023

  24. [25]

    Hamada Y, Seo M S and Shiu G 2017Physical Review D96ISSN 2470-0029 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.023509

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.023509

  25. [26]

    Ferreira R Z, Sandora M and Sloth M S 2017Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2017033–033 ISSN 1475-7516 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/04/033

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/04/033 2017

  26. [27]

    Kehagias A and Riotto A 2016Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016059–059 ISSN 1475-7516 URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2016/05/059

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2016

  27. [28]

    Bonga B, Bunster C and P´ erez A 2023Phys. Rev. D108064039 URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.064039

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.064039

  28. [29]

    Seraj A and Oblak B 2023JHEP11057 URL(https://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/JHEP11(2023)057)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2023)057 2023

  29. [30]

    Mitman K, Moxon J, Scheel M A, Teukolsky S A, Boyle M, Deppe N, Kidder L E and Throwe W 2020Phys. Rev. D102104007 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.104007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.104007

  30. [31]

    Goldberg J N, Macfarlane A J, Newman E T, Rohrlich F and Sudarshan E C G 1967 J. Math. Phys.82155–2161 URLhttps://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article/8/ 11/2155/2290924/Spin-s-spherical-harmonics-and-eth

    work page 1967

  31. [32]

    Newman E T and Penrose R 1966J. Math. Phys.7URL https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article/7/5/863/2291670/ Note-on-the-Bondi-Metzner-Sachs-group

    work page

  32. [33]

    Flanagan ´E ´E and Nichols D A 2017Phys. Rev. D95044002 URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.044002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.044002

  33. [34]

    Nichols D A 2017Phys. Rev. D95084048 URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevD.95.084048

    work page