Cryogenic growth of aluminum: structural morphology, optical properties, superconductivity and microwave dielectric loss

arxiv: 2510.05473 · v1 · submitted 2025-10-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · quant-ph

Cryogenic growth of aluminum: structural morphology, optical properties, superconductivity and microwave dielectric loss

Wilson J. Y\'anez-Parre\~no , Teun A. J. van Schijndel , Anthony P. McFadden , Kaixuan Ji , Susheng Tan , Yu Wu , Sergey Frolov , Stefan Zollner

show 2 more authors

Raymond W. Simmonds Christopher J. Palmstr{\o}m

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 09:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con quant-ph

keywords aluminum thin filmscryogenic growthsuperconductivitygrain sizekinetic inductancemicrowave resonatorstwo-level systemsstructural disorder

0 comments p. Extension

The pith

Growing aluminum films at cryogenic temperatures of 6 K creates smaller grains that raise the material's superconducting critical temperature and critical magnetic field.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how growing superconducting aluminum thin films on sapphire at very low temperatures changes their structure and properties compared to standard room-temperature growth. Cryogenic growth leads to more disordered films with smaller crystalline grains, which alters how the films look and interact with light, turning them yellowish instead of mirror-like. This disorder boosts the superconductivity, allowing the material to remain superconducting at higher temperatures and stronger magnetic fields than usual for aluminum. The films also show increased kinetic inductance, which is useful for making sensitive microwave devices. However, the microwave resonators built from these films still suffer from the same dominant loss mechanisms as room-temperature ones.

Core claim

Cryogenic molecular beam epitaxy at 6 K increases structural disorder in aluminum thin films, resulting in smaller grain sizes that enhance superconductivity by increasing the critical temperature and critical field, while also raising the kinetic inductance compared to room-temperature grown films, though microwave loss remains dominated by two-level systems.

What carries the argument

Increased structural disorder and reduced crystalline grain size induced by cryogenic growth temperature, which modifies the superconducting parameters and kinetic inductance.

If this is right

Cryogenically grown aluminum films exhibit higher critical temperatures and critical fields due to smaller grains.
The optical reflectance decreases and the films appear yellow as a result of the structural changes.
Kinetic inductance is higher in the cryogenic films, potentially allowing for more compact superconducting circuits.
Microwave resonators show similar quality factors dominated by two-level system loss regardless of growth temperature.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

These films could enable more efficient superconducting quantum devices by providing higher inductance without increasing loss.
Controlling grain size through growth temperature offers a way to tune superconducting properties in thin films for specific applications.
Further studies could explore if even lower growth temperatures lead to amorphous films with different properties.

Load-bearing premise

The enhancements in superconductivity and kinetic inductance arise mainly from the smaller grain sizes and increased disorder caused by cryogenic growth rather than from impurities or substrate effects.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of grain sizes across samples with controlled impurity levels and observation of whether Tc scales with grain size independently of other variables would confirm or refute the link.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.05473 by Anthony P. McFadden, Christopher J. Palmstr{\o}m, Kaixuan Ji, Raymond W. Simmonds, Sergey Frolov, Stefan Zollner, Susheng Tan, Teun A. J. van Schijndel, Wilson J. Y\'anez-Parre\~no, Yu Wu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. High angle annular dark field-scanning transmission electron microscopy image of the Al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Pictures of completely reflective aluminum grown at 293 K and yellow aluminum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Critical field as a function of temperature for Al grown at 293 K and at 6 K. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We explore the molecular beam epitaxy synthesis of superconducting aluminum thin films grown on c-plane sapphire substrates at cryogenic temperatures of 6 K and compare their behavior with films synthesized at room temperature. We demonstrate that cryogenic growth increases structural disorder, producing crystalline grains that modify the optical, electrical, and superconducting properties of aluminum. We observe that cryogenic deposition changes the color of aluminum from fully reflective to yellow and correlate the pseudo-dielectric function and reflectance with structural changes in the film. We find that smaller grain sizes enhance the superconductivity of aluminum, increasing its critical temperature and critical field. We then estimate the superconducting gap and coherence length of Cooper pairs in aluminum in the presence of disorder. Finally, we fabricate superconducting microwave resonators on these films and find that, independently of the growth temperature, the system is dominated by two-level system loss with similar quality factors in the high and low power regimes. We further measure a higher kinetic inductance in the cryogenically grown films.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Cryogenic 6 K growth of Al films gives smaller grains, yellow color, higher Tc/Hc and kinetic inductance than room-temp growth, with similar resonator loss, but grain-size causation is not cleanly separated from possible impurities.

read the letter

The main thing here is that growing aluminum films by MBE at 6 K instead of room temperature produces smaller grains, shifts the film color to yellow, raises the critical temperature and critical field, and increases kinetic inductance, while the microwave resonators end up with comparable two-level system loss in both cases. They also estimate the gap and coherence length under the added disorder. That set of linked observations is the core result. The experiments tie growth temperature to structure, then to optics, then to transport, and finally to actual resonator devices. Measuring grain size, reflectance, pseudo-dielectric function, Tc, Hc, and kinetic inductance on the same films gives a coherent picture that is more useful than isolated property reports. The resonator data showing loss is not strongly affected by the growth change is a practical plus for people who care about circuit performance. The soft spot is the causal link. The paper attributes the superconductivity gains mainly to smaller grains and disorder, but cryogenic deposition can increase sticking of residual gases and therefore impurity levels, which could alter mean free path or superconducting parameters on their own. The two-temperature comparison does not appear to include composition checks or purity controls that would isolate grain size from those effects, so the central claim rests more on correlation than on a controlled separation of variables. If the full manuscript has XPS or similar data that rules this out, the interpretation strengthens; otherwise it stays a limitation worth flagging. This paper is aimed at groups working on aluminum films for superconducting quantum circuits and resonators. Readers who need practical growth knobs or want to see how structural changes play out across optical and microwave metrics will get usable information from it. It is worth sending to peer review because the experiments are direct, the topic is relevant to current device work, and the data are concrete enough for referees to evaluate and suggest fixes on the mechanism side.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript compares molecular beam epitaxy growth of aluminum thin films on c-plane sapphire at 6 K versus room temperature. Cryogenic growth is reported to increase structural disorder and reduce grain size, producing a color change from reflective to yellow, modified optical response (pseudo-dielectric function and reflectance), higher critical temperature and critical field, an estimated superconducting gap and coherence length in the disordered limit, and higher kinetic inductance in fabricated microwave resonators, while two-level-system loss and quality factors remain comparable across growth temperatures.

Significance. If the central correlations hold after quantitative controls, the work could be significant for superconducting quantum devices by demonstrating a growth-temperature route to elevated kinetic inductance and modified superconducting parameters while preserving resonator performance metrics. The direct linkage of morphology to optical, transport, and microwave properties provides a practical materials handle for circuit optimization.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and superconductivity results] Abstract and superconductivity results section: the central claim that smaller grain sizes enhance Tc and Hc is presented without numerical values for Tc, Hc, grain-size distributions, or associated uncertainties and statistical measures. This absence prevents quantitative assessment of the effect size and reproducibility, which is load-bearing for the enhancement assertion.
[Methods and results on film growth and characterization] Methods and results on film growth and characterization: the two-condition comparison (6 K vs. RT) does not report composition or impurity analysis (e.g., XPS, SIMS, or RBS) to separate grain-size effects from possible increased incorporation of residual gases at cryogenic temperature. This leaves the causation from structural disorder to enhanced superconductivity and kinetic inductance unisolated and is therefore load-bearing for the primary interpretation.

minor comments (2)

[Superconductivity analysis] The estimation of the superconducting gap and coherence length should explicitly state the formula or model employed and cite the relevant literature for the disordered limit.
[Figures] Figure captions for optical and resonator data should include growth-temperature labels and scale bars for direct visual comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We provide point-by-point responses to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and superconductivity results] Abstract and superconductivity results section: the central claim that smaller grain sizes enhance Tc and Hc is presented without numerical values for Tc, Hc, grain-size distributions, or associated uncertainties and statistical measures. This absence prevents quantitative assessment of the effect size and reproducibility, which is load-bearing for the enhancement assertion.

Authors: We agree that explicit numerical values and statistical details would improve quantitative assessment. In the revised manuscript we will insert the measured Tc and Hc values (with uncertainties) extracted from the transport data, together with grain-size statistics (mean, standard deviation, and distribution parameters) obtained from AFM and XRD. These additions will allow direct evaluation of the effect size. revision: yes
Referee: [Methods and results on film growth and characterization] Methods and results on film growth and characterization: the two-condition comparison (6 K vs. RT) does not report composition or impurity analysis (e.g., XPS, SIMS, or RBS) to separate grain-size effects from possible increased incorporation of residual gases at cryogenic temperature. This leaves the causation from structural disorder to enhanced superconductivity and kinetic inductance unisolated and is therefore load-bearing for the primary interpretation.

Authors: We acknowledge that direct composition or impurity profiling was not performed. Growth was carried out in UHV MBE with base pressures below 10^{-10} Torr, and the observed changes in optical response, superconductivity, and kinetic inductance correlate quantitatively with the independently measured reduction in grain size and increase in structural disorder. In revision we will expand the methods and discussion sections to justify why residual-gas incorporation is unlikely to dominate under these conditions and will note the absence of ex-situ impurity analysis as a limitation of the present study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in experimental measurements and observations

full rationale

This is a purely experimental paper reporting MBE growth of Al films at 6 K versus room temperature, followed by direct structural (grain size), optical (reflectance, pseudo-dielectric function), transport (Tc, Hc), and microwave resonator (Q, kinetic inductance) measurements. The central claims are comparative observations between the two growth conditions; no mathematical derivation chain, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation is present. The estimation of gap and coherence length applies standard disordered-superconductor relations to the measured Tc without reducing to the paper's own inputs by construction. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on experimental comparisons of two growth temperatures and standard interpretations from superconductivity and optics. No new entities are postulated. Limited free parameters appear in the estimation of gap and coherence length from measured Tc and critical field.

free parameters (1)

coherence length
Estimated from disorder-affected critical field data rather than derived from first principles.

axioms (1)

standard math BCS theory relates critical temperature, gap, and coherence length even in the presence of disorder.
Invoked when estimating the superconducting gap and coherence length from the observed Tc and critical field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5757 in / 1326 out tokens · 42361 ms · 2026-05-18T09:55:31.968419+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We find that smaller grain sizes enhance the superconductivity of aluminum, increasing its critical temperature and critical field... higher kinetic inductance in the cryogenically grown films.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We estimate the superconducting gap and coherence length... in the dirty limit using ΔSC = 1.76 kB TC and ξ = sqrt(Φ0 / 2π Hc).

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

These changes in the structure can also be measured using atomic force microscopy (AFM) which shows a dramatic difference in the surface morphology of both films

while in the samples grown at 6 K we observe rings in all directions which indicate polycrystallinity. These changes in the structure can also be measured using atomic force microscopy (AFM) which shows a dramatic difference in the surface morphology of both films. In the case of the films grown at 293 K (Fig. 1(d)) we see large domains that are well alig...

work page 2023
[2]

Anderson, Theory of dirty superconductors, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids11, 26 (1959)

P. Anderson, Theory of dirty superconductors, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids11, 26 (1959)

work page 1959
[3]

J. J. Hauser, Enhancement of superconductivity in aluminum films, Phys. Rev. B3, 1611 (1971)

work page 1971
[4]

M. N. Gastiasoro and B. M. Andersen, Enhancing superconductivity by disorder, Phys. Rev. B98, 184510 (2018)

work page 2018
[5]

Matthias, V

B. Matthias, V. B. Compton, H. Suhl, and E. Corenzwit, Ferromagnetic solutes in supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev.115, 1597 (1959)

work page 1959
[6]

R. W. Cohen and B. Abeles, Superconductivity in granular aluminum films, Phys. Rev.168, 444 (1968)

work page 1968
[7]

Lynton, B

E. Lynton, B. Serin, and M. Zucker, The superconductive critical temperature and the elec- tronic specific heat of impure tin, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids3, 165 (1957)

work page 1957
[8]

Zhang, K

W. Zhang, K. Kalashnikov, W.-S. Lu, P. Kamenov, T. DiNapoli, and M. Gershenson, Mi- croresonators fabricated from high-kinetic-inductance aluminum films, Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 011003 (2019)

work page 2019
[9]

Glezer Moshe, E

A. Glezer Moshe, E. Farber, and G. Deutscher, Granular superconductors for high kinetic inductance and low loss quantum devices, Applied Physics Letters117, 062601 (2020)

work page 2020
[10]

R. Gao, F. Wu, H. Sun, J. Chen, H. Deng, X. Ma, X. Miao, Z. Song, X. Wan, F. Wang, T. Xia, M. Ying, C. Zhang, Y. Shi, H.-H. Zhao, and C. Deng, The effects of disorder in superconducting materials on qubit coherence, Nature Communications16, 3620 (2025)

work page 2025
[11]

Deshpande, J

A. Deshpande, J. Pusskeiler, C. Prange, U. Rogge, M. Dressel, and M. Scheffler, Tuning the superconducting dome in granular aluminum thin films, Journal of Applied Physics137, 013902 (2025). 15

work page 2025
[12]

Cecil, A

T. Cecil, A. Miceli, O. Quaranta, C. Liu, D. Rosenmann, S. McHugh, and B. Mazin, Tungsten silicide films for microwave kinetic inductance detectors, Applied Physics Letters101, 032601 (2012)

work page 2012
[13]

T. M. Hazard, A. Gyenis, A. Di Paolo, A. T. Asfaw, S. A. Lyon, A. Blais, and A. A. Houck, Nanowire superinductance fluxonium qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 010504 (2019)

work page 2019
[14]

T. M. Bretz-Sullivan, R. M. Lewis, A. L. Lima-Sharma, D. Lidsky, C. M. Smyth, C. T. Harris, M. Venuti, S. Eley, and T.-M. Lu, High kinetic inductance NbTiN superconducting transmission line resonators in the very thin film limit, Applied Physics Letters121, 052602 (2022)

work page 2022
[15]

Gr¨ unhaupt, N

L. Gr¨ unhaupt, N. Maleeva, S. T. Skacel, M. Calvo, F. Levy-Bertrand, A. V. Ustinov, H. Rotzinger, A. Monfardini, G. Catelani, and I. M. Pop, Loss mechanisms and quasiparti- cle dynamics in superconducting microwave resonators made of thin-film granular aluminum, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 117001 (2018)

work page 2018
[16]

Gr¨ unhaupt, M

L. Gr¨ unhaupt, M. Spiecker, D. Gusenkova, N. Maleeva, S. T. Skacel, I. Takmakov, F. Valenti, P. Winkel, H. Rotzinger, W. Wernsdorfer, A. V. Ustinov, and I. M. Pop, Granular aluminium as a superconducting material for high-impedance quantum circuits, Nature Materials18, 816 (2019)

work page 2019
[17]

Zapata, I

N. Zapata, I. Takmakov, S. G¨ unzler, S. Geisert, S. Ihssen, M. Field, A. Nambisan, D. Rieger, T. Reisinger, W. Wernsdorfer, and I. M. Pop, Granular aluminum parametric amplifier for low-noise measurements in tesla fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 260604 (2024)

work page 2024
[18]

Frasca, I

S. Frasca, I. Arabadzhiev, S. B. de Puechredon, F. Oppliger, V. Jouanny, R. Musio, M. Scigli- uzzo, F. Minganti, P. Scarlino, and E. Charbon, NbN films with high kinetic inductance for high-quality compact superconducting resonators, Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 044021 (2023)

work page 2023
[19]

Universal bound on microwave dissipation in superconducting circuits

T. Charpentier, A. Khvalyuk, L. Ioffe, M. Feigel’man, N. Roch, and B. Sac´ ep´ e, Universal scaling of microwave dissipation in superconducting circuits (2025), arXiv:2507.08953 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[20]

C. R. H. McRae, H. Wang, J. Gao, M. R. Vissers, T. Brecht, A. Dunsworth, D. P. Pappas, and J. Mutus, Materials loss measurements using superconducting microwave resonators, Review of Scientific Instruments91, 091101 (2020)

work page 2020
[21]

N. P. de Leon, K. M. Itoh, D. Kim, K. K. Mehta, T. E. Northup, H. Paik, B. S. Palmer, N. Samarth, S. Sangtawesin, and D. W. Steuerman, Materials challenges and opportunities 16 for quantum computing hardware, Science372, eabb2823 (2021)

work page 2021
[22]

McDermott, Materials origins of decoherence in superconducting qubits, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity19, 2 (2009)

R. McDermott, Materials origins of decoherence in superconducting qubits, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity19, 2 (2009)

work page 2009
[23]

Megrant, C

A. Megrant, C. Neill, R. Barends, B. Chiaro, Y. Chen, L. Feigl, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, M. Mariantoni, P. J. J. O’Malley, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. C. White, Y. Yin, J. Zhao, C. J. Palmstrøm, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Planar superconducting res- onators with internal quality factors above one million, Applied Physics Letters100, 113510 (2012)

work page 2012
[24]

A. P. M. Place, L. V. H. Rodgers, P. Mundada, B. M. Smitham, M. Fitzpatrick, Z. Leng, A. Premkumar, J. Bryon, A. Vrajitoarea, S. Sussman, G. Cheng, T. Madhavan, H. K. Babla, X. H. Le, Y. Gang, B. J¨ ack, A. Gyenis, N. Yao, R. J. Cava, N. P. de Leon, and A. A. Houck, New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0...

work page 2021
[25]

K. D. Crowley, R. A. McLellan, A. Dutta, N. Shumiya, A. P. M. Place, X. H. Le, Y. Gang, T. Madhavan, M. P. Bland, R. Chang, N. Khedkar, Y. C. Feng, E. A. Umbarkar, X. Gui, L. V. H. Rodgers, Y. Jia, M. M. Feldman, S. A. Lyon, M. Liu, R. J. Cava, A. A. Houck, and N. P. de Leon, Disentangling losses in tantalum superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. X13, 041005 (2023)

work page 2023
[26]

C. Wang, X. Li, H. Xu, Z. Li, J. Wang, Z. Yang, Z. Mi, X. Liang, T. Su, C. Yang, G. Wang, W. Wang, Y. Li, M. Chen, C. Li, K. Linghu, J. Han, Y. Zhang, Y. Feng, Y. Song, T. Ma, J. Zhang, R. Wang, P. Zhao, W. Liu, G. Xue, Y. Jin, and H. Yu, Towards practical quan- tum computers: transmon qubit with a lifetime approaching 0.5 milliseconds, npj Quantum Inform...

work page 2022
[27]

M. P. Bland, F. Bahrami, J. G. C. Martinez, P. H. Prestegaard, B. M. Smitham, A. Joshi, E. Hedrick, A. Pakpour-Tabrizi, S. Kumar, A. Jindal, R. D. Chang, A. Yang, G. Cheng, N. Yao, R. J. Cava, N. P. de Leon, and A. A. Houck, 2D transmons with lifetimes and coherence times exceeding 1 millisecond (2025), arXiv:2503.14798

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

T. A. J. van Schijndel, A. P. McFadden, A. N. Engel, J. T. Dong, W. J. Y´ anez-Parre˜ no, M. Parthasarathy, R. W. Simmonds, and C. J. Palmstrøm, Cryogenic growth of tantalum thin films for low-loss superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 034025 (2025). 17

work page 2025
[29]

A. P. McFadden, A. Goswami, T. Zhao, T. van Schijndel, T. F. Q. Larson, S. Sahu, S. Gill, F. Lecocq, R. Simmonds, and C. Palmstrøm, Fabrication and characterization of low-loss Al/Si/Al parallel plate capacitors for superconducting quantum information applications, npj Quantum Information11, 11 (2025)

work page 2025
[30]

A. P. McFadden, J. Oh, L. Zhou, T. F. Q. Larson, S. Gill, A. V. Dixit, R. Simmonds, and F. Lecocq, Interface-sensitive microwave loss in superconducting tantalum films sputtered on c-plane sapphire (2025), arXiv:2412.16730

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

C. J. K. Richardson, N. P. Siwak, J. Hackley, Z. K. Keane, J. E. Robinson, B. Arey, I. Arslan, and B. S. Palmer, Fabrication artifacts and parallel loss channels in metamorphic epitaxial aluminum superconducting resonators, Supercond. Sci. Technol.29, 064003 (2016)

work page 2016
[32]

How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

M. Mohseni, A. Scherer, K. G. Johnson, O. Wertheim, M. Otten, N. A. Aadit, Y. Alexeev, K. M. Bresniker, K. Y. Camsari, B. Chapman, S. Chatterjee, G. A. Dagnew, A. Esposito, F. Fahim, M. Fiorentino, A. Gajjar, A. Khalid, X. Kong, B. Kulchytskyy, E. Kyoseva, R. Li, P. A. Lott, I. L. Markov, R. F. McDermott, G. Pedretti, P. Rao, E. Rieffel, A. Silva, J. Sore...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[33]

B. M. McSkimming, A. Alexander, M. H. Samuels, B. Arey, I. Arslan, and C. J. K. Richard- son, Metamorphic growth of relaxed single crystalline aluminum on silicon (111), Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A35, 021401 (2016)

work page 2016
[34]

P. M. Petroff, L. C. Feldman, A. Y. Cho, and R. S. Williams, Properties of aluminum epitaxial growth on GaAs, Journal of Applied Physics52, 7317 (1981)

work page 1981
[35]

C. R. H. McRae, A. McFadden, R. Zhao, H. Wang, J. L. Long, T. Zhao, S. Park, M. Bal, C. J. Palmstrøm, and D. P. Pappas, Cryogenic microwave loss in epitaxial Al/GaAs/Al trilayers for superconducting circuits, Journal of Applied Physics129, 025109 (2021)

work page 2021
[36]

A. P. McFadden, A. Goswami, M. Seas, C. R. H. McRae, R. Zhao, D. P. Pappas, and C. J. Palmstrøm, Epitaxial Al/GaAs/Al tri-layers fabricated using a novel wafer-bonding technique, Journal of Applied Physics128, 115301 (2020)

work page 2020
[37]

Shabani, M

J. Shabani, M. Kjaergaard, H. J. Suominen, Y. Kim, F. Nichele, K. Pakrouski, T. Stanke- vic, R. M. Lutchyn, P. Krogstrup, R. Feidenhans’l, S. Kraemer, C. Nayak, M. Troyer, C. M. Marcus, and C. J. Palmstrøm, Two-dimensional epitaxial superconductor-semiconductor het- 18 erostructures: A platform for topological superconducting networks, Phys. Rev. B93, 155...

work page 2016
[38]

W. L. Sarney, S. P. Svensson, A. C. Leff, W. F. Schiela, J. O. Yuan, M. C. Dartiailh, W. Mayer, K. S. Wickramasinghe, and J. Shabani, Aluminum metallization of III–V semiconductors for the study of proximity superconductivity, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B38, 032212 (2020)

work page 2020
[39]

Krogstrup, N

P. Krogstrup, N. L. B. Ziino, W. Chang, S. M. Albrecht, M. H. Madsen, E. Johnson, J. Nyg˚ ard, C. M. Marcus, and T. S. Jespersen, Epitaxy of semiconductor–superconductor nanowires, Nature Materials14, 400 (2015)

work page 2015
[40]

Bayros, M

K. Bayros, M. J. Cyster, J. S. Smith, and J. H. Cole, Influence of pinholes and weak-points in aluminum-oxide Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. Mater.8, 046202 (2024)

work page 2024
[41]

S. K. Tolpygo and D. Amparo, Electrical stress effect on Josephson tunneling through ultrathin AlOx barrier in Nb/Al/AlO x/Nb junctions, Journal of Applied Physics104, 063904 (2008)

work page 2008
[42]

W. M. J. van Weerdenburg, A. Kamlapure, E. H. Fyhn, X. Huang, N. P. E. van Mullekom, M. Steinbrecher, P. Krogstrup, J. Linder, and A. A. Khajetoorians, Extreme enhancement of superconductivity in epitaxial aluminum near the monolayer limit, Science Advances9, eadf5500 (2023)

work page 2023
[43]

N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics, 1st ed. (Brooks Cole, 1976)

work page 1976
[44]

A. M. Hart, D. A. Williams, and H. Ahmed, Magnetoresistance fluctuations in mesoscopic aluminium structures, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter9, L197 (1997)

work page 1997
[45]

A. M. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, J. D. Urbina, E. A. Yuzbashyan, K. Richter, and B. L. Altshuler, Bardeen-cooper-schrieffer theory of finite-size superconducting metallic grains, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 187001 (2008)

work page 2008
[46]

Bose and P

S. Bose and P. Ayyub, A review of finite size effects in quasi-zero dimensional superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 116503 (2014)

work page 2014
[47]

U. S. Pracht, N. Bachar, L. Benfatto, G. Deutscher, E. Farber, M. Dressel, and M. Scheffler, Enhanced cooper pairing versus suppressed phase coherence shaping the superconducting dome in coupled aluminum nanograins, Phys. Rev. B93, 100503 (2016)

work page 2016
[48]

A. P. Read, B. J. Chapman, C. U. Lei, J. C. Curtis, S. Ganjam, L. Krayzman, L. Frunzio, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Precision measurement of the microwave dielectric loss of sapphire in the quantum regime with parts-per-billion sensitivity, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 034064 (2023). 19

work page 2023
[49]

Matthews and A

J. Matthews and A. Blakeslee, Defects in epitaxial multilayers: I. misfit dislocations, Journal of Crystal Growth27, 118 (1974)

work page 1974
[50]

People and J

R. People and J. C. Bean, Erratum: Calculation of critical layer thickness versus lattice mismatch for Ge xSi1−x/Si strained-layer heterostructures [appl. phys. lett. 47, 322 (1985)], Applied Physics Letters49, 229 (1986)

work page 1985
[51]

Pendharkar, B

M. Pendharkar, B. Zhang, H. Wu, A. Zarassi, P. Zhang, C. P. Dempsey, J. S. Lee, S. D. Harrington, G. Badawy, S. Gazibegovic, R. L. M. O. het Veld, M. Rossi, J. Jung, A.-H. Chen, M. A. Verheijen, M. Hocevar, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, C. J. Palmstrøm, and S. M. Frolov, Parity-preserving and magnetic field–resilient superconductivity in InSb nanowires with Sn she...

work page 2021
[52]

Y. H. G. Lin, C. K. Cheng, L. B. Young, L. S. Chiang, W. S. Chen, K. H. Lai, S. P. Chiu, C. T. Wu, C. T. Liang, J. J. Lin, C. H. Hsu, Y. H. Lin, J. Kwo, and M. Hong, Nanometer- thick molecular beam epitaxy Al films capped with in situ deposited Al2O3—high-crystallinity, morphology, and superconductivity, Journal of Applied Physics136, 074401 (2024)

work page 2024
[53]

Yoshimoto, T

M. Yoshimoto, T. Maeda, T. Ohnishi, H. Koinuma, O. Ishiyama, M. Shinohara, M. Kubo, R. Miura, and A. Miyamoto, Atomic-scale formation of ultrasmooth surfaces on sapphire substrates for high-quality thin-film fabrication, Applied Physics Letters67, 2615 (1995)

work page 1995
[54]

Fox,Optical Properties of Solids, Oxford master series in condensed matter physics (Oxford University Press, 2001)

A. Fox,Optical Properties of Solids, Oxford master series in condensed matter physics (Oxford University Press, 2001)

work page 2001
[55]

Fujiwara,Spectroscopic Ellipsometry: Principles and Applications, 1st ed

H. Fujiwara,Spectroscopic Ellipsometry: Principles and Applications, 1st ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007)

work page 2007
[56]

Ehrenreich, H

H. Ehrenreich, H. R. Philipp, and B. Segall, Optical properties of aluminum, Phys. Rev.132, 1918 (1963)

work page 1918
[57]

M. D. Maloney, F. de la Cruz, and M. Cardona, Superconducting parameters and size effects of aluminum films and foils, Phys. Rev. B5, 3558 (1972)

work page 1972
[58]

M. S. Khalil, M. J. A. Stoutimore, F. C. Wellstood, and K. D. Osborn, An analysis method for asymmetric resonator transmission applied to superconducting devices, Journal of Applied Physics111, 054510 (2012)

work page 2012
[59]

Bizn´ arov´ a, A

J. Bizn´ arov´ a, A. Osman, E. Rehnman, L. Chayanun, C. Kriˇ zan, P. Malmberg, M. Rommel, C. Warren, P. Delsing, A. Yurgens, J. Bylander, and A. Fadavi Roudsari, Mitigation of interfa- cial dielectric loss in aluminum-on-silicon superconducting qubits, npj Quantum Information 20 10, 78 (2024). 21

work page 2024

[1] [1]

These changes in the structure can also be measured using atomic force microscopy (AFM) which shows a dramatic difference in the surface morphology of both films

while in the samples grown at 6 K we observe rings in all directions which indicate polycrystallinity. These changes in the structure can also be measured using atomic force microscopy (AFM) which shows a dramatic difference in the surface morphology of both films. In the case of the films grown at 293 K (Fig. 1(d)) we see large domains that are well alig...

work page 2023

[2] [2]

Anderson, Theory of dirty superconductors, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids11, 26 (1959)

P. Anderson, Theory of dirty superconductors, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids11, 26 (1959)

work page 1959

[3] [3]

J. J. Hauser, Enhancement of superconductivity in aluminum films, Phys. Rev. B3, 1611 (1971)

work page 1971

[4] [4]

M. N. Gastiasoro and B. M. Andersen, Enhancing superconductivity by disorder, Phys. Rev. B98, 184510 (2018)

work page 2018

[5] [5]

Matthias, V

B. Matthias, V. B. Compton, H. Suhl, and E. Corenzwit, Ferromagnetic solutes in supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev.115, 1597 (1959)

work page 1959

[6] [6]

R. W. Cohen and B. Abeles, Superconductivity in granular aluminum films, Phys. Rev.168, 444 (1968)

work page 1968

[7] [7]

Lynton, B

E. Lynton, B. Serin, and M. Zucker, The superconductive critical temperature and the elec- tronic specific heat of impure tin, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids3, 165 (1957)

work page 1957

[8] [8]

Zhang, K

W. Zhang, K. Kalashnikov, W.-S. Lu, P. Kamenov, T. DiNapoli, and M. Gershenson, Mi- croresonators fabricated from high-kinetic-inductance aluminum films, Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 011003 (2019)

work page 2019

[9] [9]

Glezer Moshe, E

A. Glezer Moshe, E. Farber, and G. Deutscher, Granular superconductors for high kinetic inductance and low loss quantum devices, Applied Physics Letters117, 062601 (2020)

work page 2020

[10] [10]

R. Gao, F. Wu, H. Sun, J. Chen, H. Deng, X. Ma, X. Miao, Z. Song, X. Wan, F. Wang, T. Xia, M. Ying, C. Zhang, Y. Shi, H.-H. Zhao, and C. Deng, The effects of disorder in superconducting materials on qubit coherence, Nature Communications16, 3620 (2025)

work page 2025

[11] [11]

Deshpande, J

A. Deshpande, J. Pusskeiler, C. Prange, U. Rogge, M. Dressel, and M. Scheffler, Tuning the superconducting dome in granular aluminum thin films, Journal of Applied Physics137, 013902 (2025). 15

work page 2025

[12] [12]

Cecil, A

T. Cecil, A. Miceli, O. Quaranta, C. Liu, D. Rosenmann, S. McHugh, and B. Mazin, Tungsten silicide films for microwave kinetic inductance detectors, Applied Physics Letters101, 032601 (2012)

work page 2012

[13] [13]

T. M. Hazard, A. Gyenis, A. Di Paolo, A. T. Asfaw, S. A. Lyon, A. Blais, and A. A. Houck, Nanowire superinductance fluxonium qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 010504 (2019)

work page 2019

[14] [14]

T. M. Bretz-Sullivan, R. M. Lewis, A. L. Lima-Sharma, D. Lidsky, C. M. Smyth, C. T. Harris, M. Venuti, S. Eley, and T.-M. Lu, High kinetic inductance NbTiN superconducting transmission line resonators in the very thin film limit, Applied Physics Letters121, 052602 (2022)

work page 2022

[15] [15]

Gr¨ unhaupt, N

L. Gr¨ unhaupt, N. Maleeva, S. T. Skacel, M. Calvo, F. Levy-Bertrand, A. V. Ustinov, H. Rotzinger, A. Monfardini, G. Catelani, and I. M. Pop, Loss mechanisms and quasiparti- cle dynamics in superconducting microwave resonators made of thin-film granular aluminum, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 117001 (2018)

work page 2018

[16] [16]

Gr¨ unhaupt, M

L. Gr¨ unhaupt, M. Spiecker, D. Gusenkova, N. Maleeva, S. T. Skacel, I. Takmakov, F. Valenti, P. Winkel, H. Rotzinger, W. Wernsdorfer, A. V. Ustinov, and I. M. Pop, Granular aluminium as a superconducting material for high-impedance quantum circuits, Nature Materials18, 816 (2019)

work page 2019

[17] [17]

Zapata, I

N. Zapata, I. Takmakov, S. G¨ unzler, S. Geisert, S. Ihssen, M. Field, A. Nambisan, D. Rieger, T. Reisinger, W. Wernsdorfer, and I. M. Pop, Granular aluminum parametric amplifier for low-noise measurements in tesla fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 260604 (2024)

work page 2024

[18] [18]

Frasca, I

S. Frasca, I. Arabadzhiev, S. B. de Puechredon, F. Oppliger, V. Jouanny, R. Musio, M. Scigli- uzzo, F. Minganti, P. Scarlino, and E. Charbon, NbN films with high kinetic inductance for high-quality compact superconducting resonators, Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 044021 (2023)

work page 2023

[19] [19]

Universal bound on microwave dissipation in superconducting circuits

T. Charpentier, A. Khvalyuk, L. Ioffe, M. Feigel’man, N. Roch, and B. Sac´ ep´ e, Universal scaling of microwave dissipation in superconducting circuits (2025), arXiv:2507.08953 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[20] [20]

C. R. H. McRae, H. Wang, J. Gao, M. R. Vissers, T. Brecht, A. Dunsworth, D. P. Pappas, and J. Mutus, Materials loss measurements using superconducting microwave resonators, Review of Scientific Instruments91, 091101 (2020)

work page 2020

[21] [21]

N. P. de Leon, K. M. Itoh, D. Kim, K. K. Mehta, T. E. Northup, H. Paik, B. S. Palmer, N. Samarth, S. Sangtawesin, and D. W. Steuerman, Materials challenges and opportunities 16 for quantum computing hardware, Science372, eabb2823 (2021)

work page 2021

[22] [22]

McDermott, Materials origins of decoherence in superconducting qubits, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity19, 2 (2009)

R. McDermott, Materials origins of decoherence in superconducting qubits, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity19, 2 (2009)

work page 2009

[23] [23]

Megrant, C

A. Megrant, C. Neill, R. Barends, B. Chiaro, Y. Chen, L. Feigl, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, M. Mariantoni, P. J. J. O’Malley, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. C. White, Y. Yin, J. Zhao, C. J. Palmstrøm, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Planar superconducting res- onators with internal quality factors above one million, Applied Physics Letters100, 113510 (2012)

work page 2012

[24] [24]

A. P. M. Place, L. V. H. Rodgers, P. Mundada, B. M. Smitham, M. Fitzpatrick, Z. Leng, A. Premkumar, J. Bryon, A. Vrajitoarea, S. Sussman, G. Cheng, T. Madhavan, H. K. Babla, X. H. Le, Y. Gang, B. J¨ ack, A. Gyenis, N. Yao, R. J. Cava, N. P. de Leon, and A. A. Houck, New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0...

work page 2021

[25] [25]

K. D. Crowley, R. A. McLellan, A. Dutta, N. Shumiya, A. P. M. Place, X. H. Le, Y. Gang, T. Madhavan, M. P. Bland, R. Chang, N. Khedkar, Y. C. Feng, E. A. Umbarkar, X. Gui, L. V. H. Rodgers, Y. Jia, M. M. Feldman, S. A. Lyon, M. Liu, R. J. Cava, A. A. Houck, and N. P. de Leon, Disentangling losses in tantalum superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. X13, 041005 (2023)

work page 2023

[26] [26]

C. Wang, X. Li, H. Xu, Z. Li, J. Wang, Z. Yang, Z. Mi, X. Liang, T. Su, C. Yang, G. Wang, W. Wang, Y. Li, M. Chen, C. Li, K. Linghu, J. Han, Y. Zhang, Y. Feng, Y. Song, T. Ma, J. Zhang, R. Wang, P. Zhao, W. Liu, G. Xue, Y. Jin, and H. Yu, Towards practical quan- tum computers: transmon qubit with a lifetime approaching 0.5 milliseconds, npj Quantum Inform...

work page 2022

[27] [27]

M. P. Bland, F. Bahrami, J. G. C. Martinez, P. H. Prestegaard, B. M. Smitham, A. Joshi, E. Hedrick, A. Pakpour-Tabrizi, S. Kumar, A. Jindal, R. D. Chang, A. Yang, G. Cheng, N. Yao, R. J. Cava, N. P. de Leon, and A. A. Houck, 2D transmons with lifetimes and coherence times exceeding 1 millisecond (2025), arXiv:2503.14798

work page arXiv 2025

[28] [28]

T. A. J. van Schijndel, A. P. McFadden, A. N. Engel, J. T. Dong, W. J. Y´ anez-Parre˜ no, M. Parthasarathy, R. W. Simmonds, and C. J. Palmstrøm, Cryogenic growth of tantalum thin films for low-loss superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 034025 (2025). 17

work page 2025

[29] [29]

A. P. McFadden, A. Goswami, T. Zhao, T. van Schijndel, T. F. Q. Larson, S. Sahu, S. Gill, F. Lecocq, R. Simmonds, and C. Palmstrøm, Fabrication and characterization of low-loss Al/Si/Al parallel plate capacitors for superconducting quantum information applications, npj Quantum Information11, 11 (2025)

work page 2025

[30] [30]

A. P. McFadden, J. Oh, L. Zhou, T. F. Q. Larson, S. Gill, A. V. Dixit, R. Simmonds, and F. Lecocq, Interface-sensitive microwave loss in superconducting tantalum films sputtered on c-plane sapphire (2025), arXiv:2412.16730

work page arXiv 2025

[31] [31]

C. J. K. Richardson, N. P. Siwak, J. Hackley, Z. K. Keane, J. E. Robinson, B. Arey, I. Arslan, and B. S. Palmer, Fabrication artifacts and parallel loss channels in metamorphic epitaxial aluminum superconducting resonators, Supercond. Sci. Technol.29, 064003 (2016)

work page 2016

[32] [32]

How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

M. Mohseni, A. Scherer, K. G. Johnson, O. Wertheim, M. Otten, N. A. Aadit, Y. Alexeev, K. M. Bresniker, K. Y. Camsari, B. Chapman, S. Chatterjee, G. A. Dagnew, A. Esposito, F. Fahim, M. Fiorentino, A. Gajjar, A. Khalid, X. Kong, B. Kulchytskyy, E. Kyoseva, R. Li, P. A. Lott, I. L. Markov, R. F. McDermott, G. Pedretti, P. Rao, E. Rieffel, A. Silva, J. Sore...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

[33] [33]

B. M. McSkimming, A. Alexander, M. H. Samuels, B. Arey, I. Arslan, and C. J. K. Richard- son, Metamorphic growth of relaxed single crystalline aluminum on silicon (111), Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A35, 021401 (2016)

work page 2016

[34] [34]

P. M. Petroff, L. C. Feldman, A. Y. Cho, and R. S. Williams, Properties of aluminum epitaxial growth on GaAs, Journal of Applied Physics52, 7317 (1981)

work page 1981

[35] [35]

C. R. H. McRae, A. McFadden, R. Zhao, H. Wang, J. L. Long, T. Zhao, S. Park, M. Bal, C. J. Palmstrøm, and D. P. Pappas, Cryogenic microwave loss in epitaxial Al/GaAs/Al trilayers for superconducting circuits, Journal of Applied Physics129, 025109 (2021)

work page 2021

[36] [36]

A. P. McFadden, A. Goswami, M. Seas, C. R. H. McRae, R. Zhao, D. P. Pappas, and C. J. Palmstrøm, Epitaxial Al/GaAs/Al tri-layers fabricated using a novel wafer-bonding technique, Journal of Applied Physics128, 115301 (2020)

work page 2020

[37] [37]

Shabani, M

J. Shabani, M. Kjaergaard, H. J. Suominen, Y. Kim, F. Nichele, K. Pakrouski, T. Stanke- vic, R. M. Lutchyn, P. Krogstrup, R. Feidenhans’l, S. Kraemer, C. Nayak, M. Troyer, C. M. Marcus, and C. J. Palmstrøm, Two-dimensional epitaxial superconductor-semiconductor het- 18 erostructures: A platform for topological superconducting networks, Phys. Rev. B93, 155...

work page 2016

[38] [38]

W. L. Sarney, S. P. Svensson, A. C. Leff, W. F. Schiela, J. O. Yuan, M. C. Dartiailh, W. Mayer, K. S. Wickramasinghe, and J. Shabani, Aluminum metallization of III–V semiconductors for the study of proximity superconductivity, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B38, 032212 (2020)

work page 2020

[39] [39]

Krogstrup, N

P. Krogstrup, N. L. B. Ziino, W. Chang, S. M. Albrecht, M. H. Madsen, E. Johnson, J. Nyg˚ ard, C. M. Marcus, and T. S. Jespersen, Epitaxy of semiconductor–superconductor nanowires, Nature Materials14, 400 (2015)

work page 2015

[40] [40]

Bayros, M

K. Bayros, M. J. Cyster, J. S. Smith, and J. H. Cole, Influence of pinholes and weak-points in aluminum-oxide Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. Mater.8, 046202 (2024)

work page 2024

[41] [41]

S. K. Tolpygo and D. Amparo, Electrical stress effect on Josephson tunneling through ultrathin AlOx barrier in Nb/Al/AlO x/Nb junctions, Journal of Applied Physics104, 063904 (2008)

work page 2008

[42] [42]

W. M. J. van Weerdenburg, A. Kamlapure, E. H. Fyhn, X. Huang, N. P. E. van Mullekom, M. Steinbrecher, P. Krogstrup, J. Linder, and A. A. Khajetoorians, Extreme enhancement of superconductivity in epitaxial aluminum near the monolayer limit, Science Advances9, eadf5500 (2023)

work page 2023

[43] [43]

N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics, 1st ed. (Brooks Cole, 1976)

work page 1976

[44] [44]

A. M. Hart, D. A. Williams, and H. Ahmed, Magnetoresistance fluctuations in mesoscopic aluminium structures, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter9, L197 (1997)

work page 1997

[45] [45]

A. M. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, J. D. Urbina, E. A. Yuzbashyan, K. Richter, and B. L. Altshuler, Bardeen-cooper-schrieffer theory of finite-size superconducting metallic grains, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 187001 (2008)

work page 2008

[46] [46]

Bose and P

S. Bose and P. Ayyub, A review of finite size effects in quasi-zero dimensional superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 116503 (2014)

work page 2014

[47] [47]

U. S. Pracht, N. Bachar, L. Benfatto, G. Deutscher, E. Farber, M. Dressel, and M. Scheffler, Enhanced cooper pairing versus suppressed phase coherence shaping the superconducting dome in coupled aluminum nanograins, Phys. Rev. B93, 100503 (2016)

work page 2016

[48] [48]

A. P. Read, B. J. Chapman, C. U. Lei, J. C. Curtis, S. Ganjam, L. Krayzman, L. Frunzio, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Precision measurement of the microwave dielectric loss of sapphire in the quantum regime with parts-per-billion sensitivity, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 034064 (2023). 19

work page 2023

[49] [49]

Matthews and A

J. Matthews and A. Blakeslee, Defects in epitaxial multilayers: I. misfit dislocations, Journal of Crystal Growth27, 118 (1974)

work page 1974

[50] [50]

People and J

R. People and J. C. Bean, Erratum: Calculation of critical layer thickness versus lattice mismatch for Ge xSi1−x/Si strained-layer heterostructures [appl. phys. lett. 47, 322 (1985)], Applied Physics Letters49, 229 (1986)

work page 1985

[51] [51]

Pendharkar, B

M. Pendharkar, B. Zhang, H. Wu, A. Zarassi, P. Zhang, C. P. Dempsey, J. S. Lee, S. D. Harrington, G. Badawy, S. Gazibegovic, R. L. M. O. het Veld, M. Rossi, J. Jung, A.-H. Chen, M. A. Verheijen, M. Hocevar, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, C. J. Palmstrøm, and S. M. Frolov, Parity-preserving and magnetic field–resilient superconductivity in InSb nanowires with Sn she...

work page 2021

[52] [52]

Y. H. G. Lin, C. K. Cheng, L. B. Young, L. S. Chiang, W. S. Chen, K. H. Lai, S. P. Chiu, C. T. Wu, C. T. Liang, J. J. Lin, C. H. Hsu, Y. H. Lin, J. Kwo, and M. Hong, Nanometer- thick molecular beam epitaxy Al films capped with in situ deposited Al2O3—high-crystallinity, morphology, and superconductivity, Journal of Applied Physics136, 074401 (2024)

work page 2024

[53] [53]

Yoshimoto, T

M. Yoshimoto, T. Maeda, T. Ohnishi, H. Koinuma, O. Ishiyama, M. Shinohara, M. Kubo, R. Miura, and A. Miyamoto, Atomic-scale formation of ultrasmooth surfaces on sapphire substrates for high-quality thin-film fabrication, Applied Physics Letters67, 2615 (1995)

work page 1995

[54] [54]

Fox,Optical Properties of Solids, Oxford master series in condensed matter physics (Oxford University Press, 2001)

A. Fox,Optical Properties of Solids, Oxford master series in condensed matter physics (Oxford University Press, 2001)

work page 2001

[55] [55]

Fujiwara,Spectroscopic Ellipsometry: Principles and Applications, 1st ed

H. Fujiwara,Spectroscopic Ellipsometry: Principles and Applications, 1st ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007)

work page 2007

[56] [56]

Ehrenreich, H

H. Ehrenreich, H. R. Philipp, and B. Segall, Optical properties of aluminum, Phys. Rev.132, 1918 (1963)

work page 1918

[57] [57]

M. D. Maloney, F. de la Cruz, and M. Cardona, Superconducting parameters and size effects of aluminum films and foils, Phys. Rev. B5, 3558 (1972)

work page 1972

[58] [58]

M. S. Khalil, M. J. A. Stoutimore, F. C. Wellstood, and K. D. Osborn, An analysis method for asymmetric resonator transmission applied to superconducting devices, Journal of Applied Physics111, 054510 (2012)

work page 2012

[59] [59]

Bizn´ arov´ a, A

J. Bizn´ arov´ a, A. Osman, E. Rehnman, L. Chayanun, C. Kriˇ zan, P. Malmberg, M. Rommel, C. Warren, P. Delsing, A. Yurgens, J. Bylander, and A. Fadavi Roudsari, Mitigation of interfa- cial dielectric loss in aluminum-on-silicon superconducting qubits, npj Quantum Information 20 10, 78 (2024). 21

work page 2024