pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.06712 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-08 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th· nucl-th

Dissecting the moat regime at low energies I: Renormalization and the phase structure

Fabian Rennecke , Shi Yin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 09:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-thnucl-th
keywords moat regimequark-meson modelrenormalizationdense QCDphase structurefinite densityrandom phase approximation
0
0 comments X

The pith

The moat regime in dense QCD shrinks or expands depending on quark-meson interaction strength after consistent renormalization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how renormalization and quark-meson coupling affect the moat regime, where meson energy minima occur at nonzero momentum, in a low-energy model of dense matter. It employs a two-flavor quark-meson model at finite temperature and density treated in the random phase approximation and introduces a renormalization scheme that respects the momentum dependence of meson self-energies. The central finding is that the size and location of the moat regime in the phase diagram depend critically on the details of the quark-meson interaction. Different renormalization conditions further influence whether results remain consistent under the renormalization group. Readers interested in phases of QCD matter would care because the work helps isolate physical behavior from artifacts of the model truncation.

Core claim

In the two-flavor quark-meson model at finite temperature and baryon density in the random phase approximation, a convenient renormalization scheme is put forward to account for the nontrivial momentum dependence of meson self-energies. The extent of the moat regime in the phase diagram critically depends on the interaction of quarks and mesons, while renormalization conditions determine whether results on the moat regime remain renormalization-group consistent.

What carries the argument

Two-flavor quark-meson model in the random phase approximation equipped with a renormalization scheme that handles momentum-dependent meson self-energies.

If this is right

  • Varying renormalization conditions shifts the boundaries of the moat regime in the temperature-density plane.
  • Stronger or weaker quark-meson interactions can suppress or enlarge the region where the moat regime appears.
  • The random phase approximation combined with this renormalization yields phase-structure results that can be compared directly to other low-energy approaches.
  • The moat regime's sensitivity to coupling details constrains which regions of dense matter are accessible to this model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the model to include vector mesons would likely narrow the moat regime further and could be tested against the present results.
  • The renormalization scheme offers a template for similar momentum-dependent analyses in related effective theories of QCD.
  • Signatures of the moat regime in neutron-star or heavy-ion observables might be used to bound the effective quark-meson coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The two-flavor quark-meson model in the random phase approximation, together with the proposed renormalization scheme, captures the dominant physical effects without introducing uncontrolled artifacts from the truncation or model choice.

What would settle it

A direct computation of meson dispersion relations in a different truncation or model that finds the moat regime boundaries unchanged when quark-meson coupling is varied while keeping the same renormalization conditions would falsify the dependence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.06712 by Fabian Rennecke, Shi Yin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The full meson propagator, denoted by the gray dot, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Spatial pion wave function renormalization at vanish [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Pion self-energy as function of the spatial momentum in vacuum (left) and at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spatial pion wave function renormalization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Spatial pion wave function renormalization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Spatial pion wave function renormalization in the phase diagram. The left plot is the result of the renormalization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The quark-meson interaction at one-loop. The gray [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dense QCD matter can feature a moat regime, where the static energy of mesons is minimal at nonzero momentum. Valuable insights into this regime can be gained using low-energy models. This, however, requires a careful assessment of model artifacts. We therefore study the effects of renormalization and in-medium modifications of quark-meson interaction on the moat regime. To capture the main effects, we use a two-flavor quark-meson model at finite temperature and baryon density in the random phase approximation. We put forward a convenient renormalization scheme to account for the nontrivial momentum dependence of meson self-energies and discuss the role of renormalization conditions for renormalization group consistent results on the moat regime. In addition, we demonstrate and that its extent in the phase diagram critically depends on the interaction of quarks and mesons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the moat regime in dense QCD matter within the two-flavor quark-meson model at finite temperature and baryon density, employing the random phase approximation. It introduces a renormalization scheme designed to accommodate the momentum dependence of meson self-energies, examines the role of renormalization conditions in achieving renormalization-group consistent results, and reports that the spatial extent of the moat regime in the phase diagram depends critically on the strength of the quark-meson interactions.

Significance. If the central dependence result survives scrutiny of the truncation, the work usefully quantifies model artifacts in low-energy effective theories for the QCD phase diagram at nonzero density. The proposed renormalization scheme for momentum-dependent self-energies is a constructive technical step toward RG-consistent treatments; the explicit demonstration of interaction sensitivity provides a concrete benchmark for future model refinements.

major comments (1)
  1. [§2 and §4] §2 (RPA setup) and §4 (phase-structure results): the meson self-energy is obtained solely from the one-loop quark bubble. Near the phase boundary where the moat regime appears, meson fluctuations and higher vertices omitted in RPA become potentially important; without an estimate of their effect on the reported coupling-strength dependence, it remains unclear whether the observed sensitivity is robust or an artifact of the truncation. This directly affects the load-bearing claim that the moat extent “critically depends” on quark-meson interactions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Renormalization section] Clarify the precise renormalization conditions imposed on the momentum-dependent self-energy (e.g., subtraction point and counterterm structure) so that the RG-consistency argument can be followed without ambiguity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the values of the quark-meson coupling used in each panel to facilitate direct comparison with the interaction-dependence claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and the detailed comments. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2 and §4] §2 (RPA setup) and §4 (phase-structure results): the meson self-energy is obtained solely from the one-loop quark bubble. Near the phase boundary where the moat regime appears, meson fluctuations and higher vertices omitted in RPA become potentially important; without an estimate of their effect on the reported coupling-strength dependence, it remains unclear whether the observed sensitivity is robust or an artifact of the truncation. This directly affects the load-bearing claim that the moat extent “critically depends” on quark-meson interactions.

    Authors: We agree that the meson self-energy in our RPA calculation arises exclusively from the one-loop quark bubble. Meson fluctuations and higher-order vertices are omitted by construction in this truncation and could quantitatively modify the moat regime near the phase boundary. Our work, however, is explicitly framed as an investigation of renormalization and interaction sensitivity inside the RPA, a standard approximation in low-energy models. The reported critical dependence on the quark-meson coupling is therefore a well-defined result within this framework and serves as a concrete benchmark for model artifacts, consistent with the referee’s significance assessment. A quantitative estimate of beyond-RPA corrections would require a different truncation (e.g., inclusion of meson loops or functional methods) and is outside the scope of the present study. We have added a clarifying paragraph in Section 4 that explicitly states the limitations of the RPA truncation and the context of our findings. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Quantitative estimate of the effects of meson fluctuations and higher vertices on the reported coupling-strength dependence of the moat regime

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model results on moat extent remain independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper studies the moat regime using the two-flavor quark-meson model in RPA at finite T and mu, introducing a renormalization scheme to handle momentum-dependent self-energies and ensure RG consistency. The central demonstration—that moat extent depends on quark-meson interactions—is obtained by varying model parameters within this framework and inspecting the resulting phase structure. No equations reduce a prediction to a fitted input by construction, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that is then treated as external, and the renormalization conditions are presented as methodological choices rather than tautological redefinitions of the target observable. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and does not collapse to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the quark-meson model whose parameters are inherited from prior literature, the random phase approximation, and a newly proposed renormalization scheme whose consistency conditions are not fully specified in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • quark-meson coupling strength
    Standard parameter of the model whose in-medium modification is varied to test dependence of the moat regime.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Random phase approximation suffices to capture the main effects on the moat regime.
    Explicitly stated as the approximation used in the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper The proposed renormalization scheme yields renormalization-group consistent results for the moat regime.
    Introduced in the abstract as a convenient scheme whose role for RG consistency is discussed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5669 in / 1377 out tokens · 30890 ms · 2026-05-18T09:49:51.934225+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 25 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Chenet al., Properties of the QCD matter: review of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collider beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program, Nucl

    J. Chenet al., Properties of the QCD matter: review of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collider beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 214 (2024), arXiv:2407.02935 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Mondal (STAR), Search for QCD Critical Point: Re- cent Results from STAR BES-I Program and Status of BES-II, DAE Symp

    B. Mondal (STAR), Search for QCD Critical Point: Re- cent Results from STAR BES-I Program and Status of BES-II, DAE Symp. Nucl. Phys.67, 983 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    This corresponds to (T, µB)≈(156,200) MeV at freeze-out and is therefore well within the range where a CEP has been excluded both from functional and lattice QCD, see, e.g., Refs

    STAR has recently reported a significant deviation of the kurtosis of the net-proton distribution from the noncrit- ical baseline at √s= 19.6 GeV [81]. This corresponds to (T, µB)≈(156,200) MeV at freeze-out and is therefore well within the range where a CEP has been excluded both from functional and lattice QCD, see, e.g., Refs. [11–13, 82, 83]

    work page

  4. [4]

    Abdallahet al.(STAR), Higher-order cumulants and correlation functions of proton multiplicity distri- butions in sNN=3 GeV Au+Au collisions at the RHIC STAR experiment, Phys

    M. Abdallahet al.(STAR), Higher-order cumulants and correlation functions of proton multiplicity distri- butions in sNN=3 GeV Au+Au collisions at the RHIC STAR experiment, Phys. Rev. C107, 024908 (2023), arXiv:2209.11940 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Challenges in QCD matter physics - The Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment at FAIR

    T. Ablyazimovet al.(CBM), Challenges in QCD mat- ter physics –The scientific programme of the Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment at FAIR, Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 60 (2017), arXiv:1607.01487 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Ma´ ckowiak-Paw lowska (NA61/SHINE), Higher or- der moments of net-charge and multiplicity distri- butions inp+pinteractions at SPS energies from NA61/SHINE, Acta Phys

    M. Ma´ ckowiak-Paw lowska (NA61/SHINE), Higher or- der moments of net-charge and multiplicity distri- butions inp+pinteractions at SPS energies from NA61/SHINE, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp.10, 657 (2017), arXiv:1610.03838 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Kapishin, Heavy Ion BM@N and MPD Experiments at NICA, JPS Conf

    M. Kapishin, Heavy Ion BM@N and MPD Experiments at NICA, JPS Conf. Proc.32, 010093 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Sako (J-PARC-HI), Studies of extremely dense matter in heavy-ion collisions at J-PARC, Nucl

    H. Sako (J-PARC-HI), Studies of extremely dense matter in heavy-ion collisions at J-PARC, Nucl. Phys. A982, 959 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    The QCD phase diagram from analytic continuation

    R. Bellwied, S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. Guenther, S. D. Katz, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, The QCD phase dia- gram from analytic continuation, Phys. Lett.B751, 559 (2015), arXiv:1507.07510 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    Bazavovet al.(HotQCD), Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials, Phys

    A. Bazavovet al.(HotQCD), Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials, Phys. Lett.B795, 15 (2019), arXiv:1812.08235 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D101, 054032 (2020), arXiv:1909.02991 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Gao and J

    F. Gao and J. M. Pawlowski, Chiral phase structure and critical end point in QCD, Phys. Lett. B820, 136584 (2021), arXiv:2010.13705 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    P. J. Gunkel and C. S. Fischer, Locating the critical endpoint of QCD: mesonic backcoupling effects (2021), arXiv:2106.08356 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    R. D. Pisarski and F. Rennecke, Signatures of Moat Regimes in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 152302 (2021), arXiv:2103.06890 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, R. D. Pisarski, F. Ren- necke, R. Wen, and S. Yin, QCD moat regime and its real-time properties, Phys. Rev. D111, 094026 (2025), arXiv:2412.15949 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    T. F. Motta, J. Bernhardt, M. Buballa, and C. S. Fischer, Toward a stability analysis of inhomogeneous phases in QCD, Phys. Rev. D108, 114019 (2023), arXiv:2306.09749 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    T. F. Motta, J. Bernhardt, M. Buballa, and C. S. Fischer, Inhomogenuous instabilities at large chemical potential in a rainbow-ladder QCD model, Phys. Rev. D110, 074014 (2024), arXiv:2406.00205 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    T. F. Motta, J. Bernhardt, M. Buballa, and C. S. Fischer, New tool to detect inhomogeneous chiral- symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D111, 074030 (2025), arXiv:2411.02285 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Fulde and R

    P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Superconductivity in a Strong Spin-Exchange Field, Phys. Rev.135, A550 (1964)

    work page 1964

  20. [20]

    R. M. Hornreich, M. Luban, and S. Shtrikman, Criti- cal Behavior at the Onset of ⃗k–Space Instability on the lamda Line, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 1678 (1975)

    work page 1975

  21. [21]

    Seul and D

    M. Seul and D. Andelman, Domain shapes and patterns: The phenomenology of modulated phases, Science267, 476 (1995)

    work page 1995

  22. [22]

    Chakrabarty and Z

    S. Chakrabarty and Z. Nussinov, Modulation and corre- lation lengths in systems with competing interactions, Physical Review B84, 10.1103/physrevb.84.144402 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.144402 2011

  23. [23]

    T. A. Sedrakyan, L. I. Glazman, and A. Kamenev, Ab- sence of Bose condensation on lattices with moat bands, Phys. Rev. B89, 201112 (2014), arXiv:1303.7272 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Inhomogeneous chiral condensates

    M. Buballa and S. Carignano, Inhomogeneous chiral condensates, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.81, 39 (2015), arXiv:1406.1367 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  25. [25]

    M. A. Schindler, S. T. Schindler, L. Medina, and M. C. Ogilvie, Universality of Pattern Formation, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114510 (2020), arXiv:1906.07288 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    R. D. Pisarski, A. M. Tsvelik, and S. Valgushev, How transverse thermal fluctuations disorder a condensate of chiral spirals into a quantum spin liquid, Phys. Rev. D 102, 016015 (2020), arXiv:2005.10259 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    M. A. Schindler, S. T. Schindler, and M. C. Ogilvie,PTsymmetry, pattern formation, and finite- density QCD 10.1088/1742-6596/2038/1/012022 (2021), arXiv:2106.07092 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2038/1/012022 2038

  28. [28]

    Nussinov, M

    Z. Nussinov, M. C. Ogilvie, L. Pannullo, R. D. Pisarski, F. Rennecke, S. T. Schindler, and M. Winstel, Dilepton Production from Moaton Quasiparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 101904 (2025), arXiv:2410.22418 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    R. D. Pisarski, F. Rennecke, A. Tsvelik, and S. Valgu- shev, The Lifshitz Regime and its Experimental Signals, Nucl. Phys. A1005, 121910 (2021), arXiv:2005.00045 [nucl-th]. 16

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Rennecke and R

    F. Rennecke and R. D. Pisarski, Moat Regimes in QCD and their Signatures in Heavy-Ion Collisions, PoS CPOD2021, 016 (2022), arXiv:2110.02625 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Rennecke, R

    F. Rennecke, R. D. Pisarski, and D. H. Rischke, Particle Interferometry in a Moat Regime (2023), arXiv:2301.11484 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Koenigstein, L

    A. Koenigstein, L. Pannullo, S. Rechenberger, M. J. Steil, and M. Winstel, Detecting inhomogeneous chiral con- densation from the bosonic two-point function in the (1 + 1)-dimensional Gross–Neveu model in the mean- field approximation*, J. Phys. A55, 375402 (2022), arXiv:2112.07024 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Pannullo and M

    L. Pannullo and M. Winstel, Absence of inhomoge- neous chiral phases in (2+1)-dimensional four-fermion and Yukawa models, Phys. Rev. D108, 036011 (2023), arXiv:2305.09444 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Pannullo, Inhomogeneous condensation in the Gross- Neveu model in noninteger spatial dimensions 1≤d<3, Phys

    L. Pannullo, Inhomogeneous condensation in the Gross- Neveu model in noninteger spatial dimensions 1≤d<3, Phys. Rev. D108, 036022 (2023), arXiv:2306.16290 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Koenigstein and L

    A. Koenigstein and L. Pannullo, Inhomogeneous con- densation in the Gross-Neveu model in noninteger spa- tial dimensions 1≤d<3. II. Nonzero temperature and chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D109, 056015 (2024), arXiv:2312.04904 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Winstel, Spatially oscillating correlation functions in (2+1)-dimensional four-fermion models: The mixing of scalar and vector modes at finite density, Phys

    M. Winstel, Spatially oscillating correlation functions in (2+1)-dimensional four-fermion models: The mixing of scalar and vector modes at finite density, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034008 (2024), arXiv:2403.07430 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Pannullo, M

    L. Pannullo, M. Wagner, and M. Winstel, Regulariza- tion effects in the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model: Strong scheme dependence of inhomogeneous phases and per- sistence of the moat regime, Phys. Rev. D110, 076006 (2024), arXiv:2406.11312 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    T¨ opfel, J

    S. T¨ opfel, J. M. Pawlowski, and J. Braun, Phase struc- ture of quark matter and in-medium properties of mesons from callan-symanzik flows, (2024), arXiv:2412.16059 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Cao, The moat regimes within 2 + 1 flavor Polyakov- Quark-Meson model, (2025), arXiv:2504.18874 [hep-ph]

    G. Cao, The moat regimes within 2 + 1 flavor Polyakov- Quark-Meson model, (2025), arXiv:2504.18874 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    T. F. Motta and G. Krein, The Quark Structure of the Nucleon and Moat Regimes in Nuclear Matter, (2025), arXiv:2508.09287 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    T. L. Partyka and M. Sadzikowski, Phase diagram of the non-uniform chiral condensate in different regular- ization schemes at T=0, J. Phys. G36, 025004 (2009), arXiv:0811.4616 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  42. [42]

    Buballa, L

    M. Buballa, L. Kurth, M. Wagner, and M. Winstel, Regulator dependence of inhomogeneous phases in the (2+1)-dimensional Gross-Neveu model, Phys. Rev. D 103, 034503 (2021), arXiv:2012.09588 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Renormalization group consistency and low-energy effective theories

    J. Braun, M. Leonhardt, and J. M. Pawlowski, Renormal- ization group consistency and low-energy effective theo- ries, SciPost Phys.6, 056 (2019), arXiv:1806.04432 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Gell-Mann and M

    M. Gell-Mann and M. Levy, The axial vector current in beta decay, Nuovo Cim.16, 705 (1960)

    work page 1960

  45. [45]

    D. U. Jungnickel and C. Wetterich, Effective action for the chiral quark-meson model, Phys. Rev. D53, 5142 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9505267

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  46. [46]

    The Phase Diagram of the Quark-Meson Model

    B.-J. Schaefer and J. Wambach, The Phase diagram of the quark meson model, Nucl. Phys. A757, 479 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0403039

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  47. [47]

    Spectral Functions for the Quark-Meson Model Phase Diagram from the Functional Renormalization Group

    R.-A. Tripolt, N. Strodthoff, L. von Smekal, and J. Wambach, Spectral Functions for the Quark-Meson Model Phase Diagram from the Functional Renor- malization Group, Phys. Rev. D89, 034010 (2014), arXiv:1311.0630 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [48]

    J. M. Pawlowski and F. Rennecke, Higher order quark- mesonic scattering processes and the phase structure of QCD, Phys. Rev.D90, 076002 (2014), arXiv:1403.1179 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [49]

    Existence of the critical endpoint in the vector meson extended linear sigma model

    P. Kov´ acs, Z. Sz´ ep, and G. Wolf, Existence of the critical endpoint in the vector meson extended lin- ear sigma model, Phys. Rev. D93, 114014 (2016), arXiv:1601.05291 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    From Quarks and Gluons to Hadrons: Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Dynamical QCD

    J. Braun, L. Fister, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, From Quarks and Gluons to Hadrons: Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Dynamical QCD, Phys. Rev.D94, 034016 (2016), arXiv:1412.1045 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    The Vacuum Structure of Vector Mesons in QCD

    F. Rennecke, Vacuum structure of vector mesons in QCD, Phys. Rev.D92, 076012 (2015), arXiv:1504.03585 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    Rennecke,The Chiral Phase Transition of QCD., Ph.D

    F. Rennecke,The Chiral Phase Transition of QCD., Ph.D. thesis, U. Heidelberg (main) (2015)

    work page 2015

  53. [53]

    A. K. Cyrol, M. Mitter, J. M. Pawlowski, and N. Strodthoff, Nonperturbative quark, gluon, and meson correlators of unquenched QCD, Phys. Rev.D97, 054006 (2018), arXiv:1706.06326 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Ihssen, J

    F. Ihssen, J. M. Pawlowski, F. R. Sattler, and N. Wink, Towards quantitative precision in functional QCD I, (2024), arXiv:2408.08413 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    B. B. Brandt, V. Chelnokov, G. Endrodi, G. Marko, D. Scheid, and L. von Smekal, Renormalization group invariant mean-field model for QCD at finite isospin den- sity, Phys. Rev. D112, 054038 (2025), arXiv:2502.04025 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Gholami, L

    H. Gholami, L. Kurth, U. Mire, M. Buballa, and B.- J. Schaefer, Renormalizing the Quark-Meson-Diquark Model, (2025), arXiv:2505.22542 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Inhomogeneous phases in the quark-meson model with vacuum fluctuations

    S. Carignano, M. Buballa, and B.-J. Schaefer, In- homogeneous phases in the quark-meson model with vacuum fluctuations, Phys. Rev.D90, 014033 (2014), arXiv:1404.0057 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  58. [58]

    Consistent parameter fixing in the quark-meson model with vacuum fluctuations

    S. Carignano, M. Buballa, and W. Elkamhawy, Consis- tent parameter fixing in the quark-meson model with vacuum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D94, 034023 (2016), arXiv:1606.08859 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    On-shell parameter fixing in the quark-meson model

    P. Adhikari, J. O. Andersen, and P. Kneschke, On-shell parameter fixing in the quark-meson model, Phys. Rev. D95, 036017 (2017), arXiv:1612.03668 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Inhomogeneous chiral condensate in the quark-meson model

    P. Adhikari, J. O. Andersen, and P. Kneschke, Inhomoge- neous chiral condensate in the quark-meson model, Phys. Rev. D96, 016013 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 98, 099902 (2018)], arXiv:1702.01324 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    Buballa, S

    M. Buballa, S. Carignano, and L. Kurth, Inhomogeneous phases in the quark-meson model with explicit chiral- symmetry breaking, Eur. Phys. J. ST229, 3371 (2020), arXiv:2006.02133 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    S. K. Rai and V. K. Tiwari, On-shell versus curvature mass parameter fixing schemes in the quark-meson model and its phase diagrams, Phys. Rev. D105, 094010 (2022), arXiv:2202.11661 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    S. Yin, R. Wen, and W.-j. Fu, Mesonic dynamics and the QCD phase transition, Phys. Rev. D100, 094029 (2019), arXiv:1907.10262 [hep-ph]. 17

    work page arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    Vacuum fluctuations and the thermodynamics of chiral models

    V. Skokov, B. Friman, E. Nakano, K. Redlich, and B. J. Schaefer, Vacuum fluctuations and the thermodynam- ics of chiral models, Phys. Rev. D82, 034029 (2010), arXiv:1005.3166 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  65. [65]

    Mukherjee, F

    S. Mukherjee, F. Rennecke, and V. V. Skokov, Analytical structure of the equation of state at finite density: Re- summation versus expansion in a low energy model, Phys. Rev. D105, 014026 (2022), arXiv:2110.02241 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory(Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995)

    work page 1995

  67. [67]

    [57, 58, 61], Zπ is implicitly fixed throughf π

    While there is no explicit renormalization condition for the wave function renormalization in Refs. [57, 58, 61], Zπ is implicitly fixed throughf π. The advantage of an explicit condition for the wave function renormalization is that it straightforwardly generalizes also to other mesons

    work page

  68. [68]

    Bazavovet al., Meson screening masses in (2+1)- flavor QCD, Phys

    A. Bazavovet al., Meson screening masses in (2+1)- flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. D100, 094510 (2019), arXiv:1908.09552 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    However, it clearly breaks down when the system enters the moat regime, asZ ⊥ changes sign whileZ ∥ is always positive due to causality

    Note thatZ ∥ π =Z ⊥ π in vacuum, and this remains a good approximation even at moderateTandµ[63]. However, it clearly breaks down when the system enters the moat regime, asZ ⊥ changes sign whileZ ∥ is always positive due to causality

    work page

  70. [70]

    We note that a similar result could presumably be achieved by using some form of Pauli-Villars regulariza- tion

    work page

  71. [71]

    Rennecke and S

    F. Rennecke and S. Yin, Dissecting the moat regime at low energies II: Correlations, in preparation (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    Note that the solution of the gap equation only depends on the curvature masses in RPA, so the chiral phase boundary is not affected by changes inZ

    work page

  73. [73]

    How many phases meet at the chiral critical point?

    D. Nickel, How many phases meet at the chiral crit- ical point?, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 072301 (2009), arXiv:0902.1778 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  74. [74]

    We thank Michael Buballa for pointing this out

    work page

  75. [75]

    S. P. Klevansky, The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.64, 649 (1992)

    work page 1992

  76. [76]

    fQCD collaboration, https://fqcd-collaboration.github.io

    work page

  77. [77]

    T. D. Cohen, Functional integrals for QCD at nonzero chemical potential and zero density, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 222001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0307089

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  78. [78]

    Bose-Einstein condensation and Silver Blaze property from the two-loop $\Phi$-derivable approximation

    G. Mark´ o, U. Reinosa, and Z. Sz´ ep, Bose-Einstein con- densation and Silver Blaze property from the two-loop Φ-derivable approximation, Phys. Rev. D90, 125021 (2014), arXiv:1410.6998 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  79. [79]

    N. Khan, J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, and M. M. Scherer, The Phase Diagram of QC2D from Functional Methods, (2015), arXiv:1512.03673 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  80. [80]

    W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, and B.-J. Schaefer, Baryon number fluctuations at finite temper- ature and density, Phys. Rev. D94, 116020 (2016), arXiv:1608.04302 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.