pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.08707 · v2 · pith:GUHADIFVnew · submitted 2025-10-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Neutrino diagnostics of hadron-quark phase transition in Neutron Stars

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 21:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords neutrino signatureshadron-quark phase transitionneutron starsquark starsneutrino light curvespectral hardeningcompact star evolutionMSW flavor conversion
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hadron-quark phase transition in neutron stars imprints specific features on the emitted neutrino light curve over 10-50 ms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models neutrino emission from a neutron star that undergoes a transition to a quark star. It combines the DD2 equation of state for hadronic matter with the MIT bag model for quark matter and a simplified set of emission processes. The resulting light curve shows an increased peak relative to the later plateau, a time offset that follows the rise in central density, and a short-lived rise in neutrino energies. These patterns survive standard flavor oscillations and could appear in a galactic supernova signal recorded by IceCube or Hyper-Kamiokande.

Core claim

We identify characteristic diagnostic features that may emerge in the neutrino light curve on ≃10-50 ms timescales. These include an enhanced peak-to-plateau ratio, a delay tracing the central density evolution, and a transient spectral hardening. After standard MSW flavor conversion, these temporal and spectral signatures remain potentially detectable for Galactic events under optimistic assumptions with detectors such as IceCube and Hyper-Kamiokande.

What carries the argument

Phenomenological neutrino emission model that includes only the dominant leptonic and hadronic processes, applied to the DD2 and MIT bag equations of state during the evolution of a compact star through deconfinement.

If this is right

  • The signatures provide temporal and spectral diagnostics of quark deconfinement in compact star evolution.
  • The features persist after standard MSW neutrino flavor conversion.
  • Under optimistic assumptions the signatures could be observed in galactic bursts by IceCube and Hyper-Kamiokande.
  • Such observations would link neutrino timing and spectrum directly to changes in central density during the transition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If observed, the signatures would constrain the timing of quark deconfinement relative to the post-bounce phase of core collapse.
  • Similar short-timescale diagnostics might be sought in multi-messenger data combining neutrinos with gravitational waves from the same event.
  • Refinements to the emission model could test whether the same features appear across a wider range of equations of state.

Load-bearing premise

A simplified phenomenological neutrino emission model limited to dominant processes and the specific DD2 and MIT bag equations of state is sufficient to produce reliable generic temporal and spectral signatures of the phase transition.

What would settle it

Detection of a galactic supernova neutrino burst that lacks an enhanced peak-to-plateau ratio, lacks a delay matching central density evolution, and shows no transient spectral hardening within the 10-50 ms window.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.08707 by Conrado Albertus Torres, Joseph Silk, M.\'Angeles P\'erez-Garc\'ia, Yossef Zenati.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Density (upper panel) and temperature (lower panel) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Time evolution of individual neutrino luminosity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Upper panel: Electron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate neutrino signatures of a hadron-quark phase transition (HQPT) in neutron stars (NS) leading to quark star (QS) formation. We use representative hadronic and quark equations of state i.e. DD2 and MIT bag model along with a phenomenological neutrino emission model including the dominant leptonic and hadronic processes. Rather than aiming at a fully consistent hydrodynamical simulation, our goal is to identify generic temporal diagnostics that may arise when deconfinement occurs during the evolution of a compact star. We identify characteristic diagnostic features that may emerge in the neutrino light curve on $\simeq 10-50$ ms timescales. These include an enhanced peak-to-plateau ratio, a delay tracing the central density evolution, and a transient spectral hardening. After standard MSW flavor conversion, these temporal and spectral signatures remain potentially detectable for Galactic events under optimistic assumptions with detectors such as IceCube and Hyper-Kamiokande. Our results suggest possible temporal and spectral diagnostics of quark deconfinement in future Galactic neutrino bursts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates neutrino signatures of a hadron-quark phase transition (HQPT) in neutron stars leading to quark star formation. It employs representative hadronic (DD2) and quark (MIT bag) equations of state together with a phenomenological neutrino emission model that includes only the dominant leptonic and hadronic processes. Rather than performing a fully consistent hydrodynamical simulation, the goal is to identify generic temporal diagnostics that may arise during deconfinement. The authors report characteristic features in the neutrino light curve on ≃10-50 ms timescales, including an enhanced peak-to-plateau ratio, a delay tracing central density evolution, and transient spectral hardening. After standard MSW flavor conversion these signatures are argued to remain potentially detectable for Galactic events with detectors such as IceCube and Hyper-Kamiokande.

Significance. If the reported temporal and spectral features prove robust under more detailed modeling, the work could supply useful exploratory diagnostics for interpreting future neutrino bursts from compact-star events and for constraining the occurrence of quark deconfinement. The choice to seek generic signatures with representative EOS rather than full hydrodynamics is a pragmatic starting point that highlights possible observables, though the phenomenological nature of the emission model limits immediate quantitative applicability.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and model description] The central diagnostics (enhanced peak-to-plateau ratio, density-tracing delay, and spectral hardening on 10-50 ms timescales) rest on a phenomenological emission model applied to fixed DD2 and MIT bag EOS without a coupled hydrodynamical simulation that incorporates latent heat, mixed-phase dynamics, and back-reaction on stellar structure. Any mismatch in the assumed temporal mapping between central density and neutrino output would directly alter the reported delay and peak-to-plateau ratio (see abstract and model description).
  2. [Abstract] No sensitivity tests or error bars are provided for the unspecified parameters in the phenomenological neutrino emission model or for variations in the chosen EOS; these parameters could influence the exact shape and amplitude of the claimed diagnostics, undermining the assertion that the features are generic.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a concise statement of the main modeling limitations to balance the presentation of the proposed diagnostics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below, clarifying the scope of our exploratory study while incorporating revisions where they strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and model description] The central diagnostics (enhanced peak-to-plateau ratio, density-tracing delay, and spectral hardening on 10-50 ms timescales) rest on a phenomenological emission model applied to fixed DD2 and MIT bag EOS without a coupled hydrodynamical simulation that incorporates latent heat, mixed-phase dynamics, and back-reaction on stellar structure. Any mismatch in the assumed temporal mapping between central density and neutrino output would directly alter the reported delay and peak-to-plateau ratio (see abstract and model description).

    Authors: We agree that the diagnostics rely on a phenomenological neutrino emission model applied to fixed representative EOS without a fully coupled hydrodynamical simulation that self-consistently includes latent heat release, mixed-phase dynamics, and structural back-reaction. This is an intentional choice stated in the manuscript: rather than pursuing a complete simulation, we aim to identify possible generic temporal features that could arise during deconfinement. The temporal mapping is derived from representative central-density evolution profiles. While a mismatch in this mapping could quantitatively affect the precise delay and peak-to-plateau values, the qualitative signatures originate from the abrupt change in emission properties at the phase transition. We have expanded the model description and added a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript discussing these assumptions and their implications for future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] No sensitivity tests or error bars are provided for the unspecified parameters in the phenomenological neutrino emission model or for variations in the chosen EOS; these parameters could influence the exact shape and amplitude of the claimed diagnostics, undermining the assertion that the features are generic.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies the lack of explicit sensitivity analysis in the original submission. To address this, we have performed additional calculations varying the dominant parameters of the phenomenological emission model (e.g., emissivity normalizations for leptonic and hadronic processes) within physically plausible ranges and tested an alternative hadronic EOS. These results are now included in a new appendix and briefly summarized in the revised abstract and conclusions. The main diagnostic features remain present across the explored variations, supporting their generic character. We have also clarified that the study is exploratory and that the reported features are qualitative indicators rather than precise quantitative predictions; no formal error bars are assigned because the model is not intended for detailed forecasting. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A fully self-consistent hydrodynamical simulation that incorporates latent heat, mixed-phase dynamics, and back-reaction on the stellar structure lies beyond the scope of the present exploratory work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in phenomenological model exploration of neutrino signatures

full rationale

The paper explicitly frames its work as non-hydrodynamical and phenomenological, using a neutrino emission model with dominant leptonic and hadronic processes applied to DD2 and MIT bag EOS to identify possible generic temporal diagnostics (enhanced peak-to-plateau ratio, delay, spectral hardening) on 10-50 ms scales. These features are direct model outputs under an assumed deconfinement scenario rather than quantities fitted to data, self-defined via the target observables, or derived through self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or smuggled ansatzes. The derivation remains self-contained as an exploratory study of potential signatures without reducing to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on two representative equations of state and a phenomenological neutrino emission model whose internal parameters are not enumerated in the abstract; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • unspecified parameters in phenomenological neutrino emission model
    The model incorporates dominant leptonic and hadronic processes but does not list numerical values or fitting procedures.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption DD2 and MIT bag model are adequate representative equations of state for hadronic and quark matter respectively
    Used directly to model the phase transition without further justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5720 in / 1283 out tokens · 52680 ms · 2026-05-21T21:07:48.712706+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 36 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Color superconductivity in dense quark matter

    Mark G. Alford, Andreas Schmitt, Krishna Rajagopal, and Thomas Sch¨ afer, “Color superconductivity in dense quark matter,” Reviews of Modern Physics80, 1455– 1515 (2008), arXiv:0709.4635 [hep-ph]

  2. [2]

    The Physics of Neu- tron Stars,

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, “The Physics of Neu- tron Stars,” Science304, 536–542 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0405262 [astro-ph]

  3. [3]

    From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review

    Gordon Baym, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Toru Kojo, Philip D. Powell, Yifan Song, and Tatsuyuki Takatsuka, “From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review,” Reports on Progress in Physics81, 056902 (2018), arXiv:1707.04966 [astro-ph.HE]

  4. [4]

    Impact of dark matter on strange quark stars described by differ- ent quark models,

    Yida Yang, Chen Wu, and Ji-Feng Yang, “Impact of dark matter on strange quark stars described by differ- ent quark models,” European Physical Journal C85, 426 (2025), arXiv:2409.09275 [astro-ph.HE]

  5. [5]

    Quark matter nucleation in neutron stars and astrophysical implications

    Ignazio Bombaci, Domenico Logoteta, Isaac Vida˜ na, and Constan¸ ca Providˆ encia, “Quark matter nucleation in neutron stars and astrophysical implications,” Euro- pean Physical Journal A52, 58 (2016), arXiv:1601.04559 [astro-ph.HE]

  6. [6]

    Annala, T

    Eemeli Annala, Tyler Gorda, Aleksi Kurkela, Joonas N¨ attil¨ a, and Aleksi Vuorinen, “Evidence for quark- matter cores in massive neutron stars,” Nature Physics 16, 907–910 (2020), arXiv:1903.09121 [astro-ph.HE]

  7. [7]

    Quarkyonic Matter and Neutron Stars

    Larry McLerran and Sanjay Reddy, “Quarkyonic Matter and Neutron Stars,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 122701 (2019), arXiv:1811.12503 [nucl-th]

  8. [8]

    Average speed of sound in neu- tron stars,

    Micha l Marczenko, “Average speed of sound in neu- tron stars,” Phys. Rev. C110, 045811 (2024), arXiv:2407.15486 [nucl-th]

  9. [9]

    Dark matter, neutron stars, and strange quark matter,

    M. Angeles Perez-Garcia, Joseph Silk, and Jirina R. Stone, “Dark matter, neutron stars, and strange quark matter,” Physical Review Letters105(2010), 10.1103/physrevlett.105.141101

  10. [11]

    Identifying a first-order phase transition in neutron star mergers through gravitational waves

    Andreas Bauswein, Niels-Uwe F. Bastian, David B. Blaschke, Katerina Chatziioannou, James A. Clark, To- bias Fischer, and Micaela Oertel, “Identifying a First- Order Phase Transition in Neutron-Star Mergers through Gravitational Waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 061102 (2019), arXiv:1809.01116 [astro-ph.HE]

  11. [12]

    Constraining the onset density of the hadron-quark phase transition with gravitational-wave observations,

    Sebastian Blacker, Niels-Uwe F. Bastian, Andreas Bauswein, David B. Blaschke, Tobias Fischer, Mi- caela Oertel, Theodoros Soultanis, and Stefan Typel, “Constraining the onset density of the hadron-quark phase transition with gravitational-wave observations,” Phys. Rev. D102, 123023 (2020), arXiv:2006.03789 [astro-ph.HE]

  12. [13]

    What neutron stars tell about the hadron-quark phase transition: A Bayesian study,

    J´ anos Tak´ atsy, P´ eter Kov´ acs, Gy¨ orgy Wolf, and J¨ urgen Schaffner-Bielich, “What neutron stars tell about the hadron-quark phase transition: A Bayesian study,” Phys. Rev. D108, 043002 (2023), arXiv:2303.00013 [astro-ph.HE]

  13. [14]

    The IceCube Neu- trino Observatory: Instrumentation and Online Sys- tems,

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), “The IceCube Neu- trino Observatory: Instrumentation and Online Sys- tems,” JINST12, P03012 (2017), arXiv:1612.05093 [astro-ph.IM]

  14. [15]

    Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report

    Hyper-Kamiokande Proto-Collaboration and K. Abe et al., “Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report,” arXiv e-prints (2018), 10.48550/arXiv.1805.04163, arXiv:1805.04163 [physics.ins-det]

  15. [16]

    Letter of Intent for KM3NeT 2.0

    S. Adrian-Martinezet al.(KM3NeT), “Letter of in- tent for KM3NeT 2.0,” J. Phys. G43, 084001 (2016), arXiv:1601.07459 [astro-ph.IM]

  16. [17]

    JUNO Conceptual Design Report

    T. Adam, F. An, G. An, and et al., “JUNO Concep- tual Design Report,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1508.07166 (2015), arXiv:1508.07166 [physics.ins-det]

  17. [18]

    Supernova Neutrino Detection

    Kate Scholberg, “Supernova Neutrino Detection,” An- nual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science62, 81–103 (2012), arXiv:1205.6003 [astro-ph.IM]

  18. [19]

    Astrophysical Implications of Equation of State for Hadron-Quark Mixed Phase: Compact Stars and Stellar Collapses

    Ken’Ichiro Nakazato, Kohsuke Sumiyoshi, and Shoichi Yamada, “Astrophysical implications of equation of state for hadron-quark mixed phase: Compact stars and stellar collapses,” Phys. Rev. D77, 103006 (2008), arXiv:0804.0661 [astro-ph]

  19. [20]

    Quark deconfinement as supernova explosion engine for massive blue-supergiant stars

    Tobias Fischer, Niels-Uwe F. Bastian, Meng-Ru Wu, Petr Baklanov, Elena Sorokina, Sergei Blinnikov, Stefan Typel, Thomas Kl¨ ahn, and David B. Blaschke, “Quark deconfinement as a supernova explosion engine for mas- sive blue supergiant stars,” Nature Astronomy2, 980– 986 (2018), arXiv:1712.08788 [astro-ph.HE]

  20. [21]

    New constraints on radii and tidal deformabilities of neutron stars from GW170817

    Elias R. Most, Lukas R. Weih, Luciano Rezzolla, and J¨ urgen Schaffner-Bielich, “New Constraints on Radii and Tidal Deformabilities of Neutron Stars from GW170817,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 261103 (2018), arXiv:1803.00549 [gr-qc]

  21. [22]

    Gravitational-wave constraints on the neutron-star-matter Equation of State

    Eemeli Annala, Tyler Gorda, Aleksi Kurkela, and Aleksi Vuorinen, “Gravitational-Wave Constraints on the Neutron-Star-Matter Equation of State,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 172703 (2018), arXiv:1711.02644 [astro-ph.HE]

  22. [23]

    Multimessenger Constraints for Ultra- dense Matter,

    Eemeli Annala, Tyler Gorda, Evangelia Katerini, Aleksi Kurkela, Joonas N¨ attil¨ a, Vasileios Paschalidis, and Aleksi Vuorinen, “Multimessenger Constraints for Ultra- dense Matter,” Physical Review X12, 011058 (2022), arXiv:2105.05132 [astro-ph.HE]

  23. [24]

    On the deconfinement phase transition in neutron- star mergers,

    Elias R. Most, L. Jens Papenfort, Veronica Dexheimer, Matthias Hanauske, Horst Stoecker, and Luciano Rez- zolla, “On the deconfinement phase transition in neutron- star mergers,” European Physical Journal A56, 59 (2020), arXiv:1910.13893 [astro-ph.HE]

  24. [25]

    GRMHD Sim- ulations of Neutron-star Mergers with Weak Interac- tions: r-process Nucleosynthesis and Electromagnetic Signatures of Dynamical Ejecta,

    Luciano Combi and Daniel M. Siegel, “GRMHD Sim- ulations of Neutron-star Mergers with Weak Interac- tions: r-process Nucleosynthesis and Electromagnetic Signatures of Dynamical Ejecta,” ApJ944, 28 (2023), arXiv:2206.03618 [astro-ph.HE]

  25. [26]

    Detectability of QCD phase transitions in binary neutron star merg- ers: Bayesian inference with the next generation gravita- tional wave detectors,

    Aviral Prakash, Ish Gupta, Matteo Breschi, Rahul Kashyap, David Radice, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Domenico Logoteta, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Detectability of QCD phase transitions in binary neutron star merg- ers: Bayesian inference with the next generation gravita- tional wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D109, 103008 (2024), arXiv:2310.06025 [gr-qc]

  26. [27]

    What neutron stars tell about the hadron-quark phase transition: A bayesian study,

    J´ anos Tak´ atsy, P´ eter Kov´ acs, Gy¨ orgy Wolf, and J¨ urgen Schaffner-Bielich, “What neutron stars tell about the hadron-quark phase transition: A bayesian study,” Phys- ical Review D108(2023), 10.1103/physrevd.108.043002. 8

  27. [28]

    A New Open-Source Code for Spherically-Symmetric Stellar Collapse to Neutron Stars and Black Holes

    Evan O’Connor and Christian D. Ott, “A new open- source code for spherically symmetric stellar collapse to neutron stars and black holes,” Classical and Quan- tum Gravity27, 114103 (2010), arXiv:0912.2393 [astro- ph.HE]

  28. [29]

    Composition and thermodynamics of nuclear matter with light clusters

    S. Typel, G. R¨ opke, T. Kl¨ ahn, D. Blaschke, and H. H. Wolter, “Composition and thermodynamics of nuclear matter with light clusters,” Phys. Rev. C81, 015803 (2010), arXiv:0908.2344 [nucl-th]

  29. [30]

    Statistical Model for a Complete Supernova Equation of State

    Matthias Hempel and J¨ urgen Schaffner-Bielich, “A statistical model for a complete supernova equa- tion of state,” Nucl. Phys. A837, 210–254 (2010), arXiv:0911.4073 [nucl-th]

  30. [31]

    Core-collapse supernova explosions triggered by a quark-hadron phase transition during the early post-bounce phase

    T. Fischer, I. Sagert, G. Pagliara, M. Hempel, J. Schaffner-Bielich, T. Rauscher, F. K. Thielemann, R. K¨ appeli, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, and M. Liebend¨ orfer, “Core-collapse Supernova Explosions Triggered by a Quark-Hadron Phase Transition During the Early Post- bounce Phase,” ApJS194, 39 (2011), arXiv:1011.3409 [astro-ph.HE]

  31. [32]

    Hyperons in hot dense matter: what do the constraints tell us for equation of state?

    M. Fortin, M. Oertel, and C. Providˆ encia, “Hyper- ons in hot dense matter: what do the constraints tell us for equation of state?” PASA35, e044 (2018), arXiv:1711.09427 [astro-ph.HE]

  32. [33]

    Black Hole Formation in Failing Core-Collapse Supernovae

    Evan O’Connor and Christian D. Ott, “Black Hole For- mation in Failing Core-Collapse Supernovae,” ApJ730, 70 (2011), arXiv:1010.5550 [astro-ph.HE]

  33. [34]

    Neutrino signals from Neu- tron Star implosions to Black Holes,

    Yossef Zenati, C. Albertus, M. ´Angeles P´ erez- Garc´ ıa, and Joseph Silk, “Neutrino signals from Neu- tron Star implosions to Black Holes,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2304.06746 (2023), arXiv:2304.06746 [astro- ph.CO]

  34. [35]

    Axion Emission From Neutron Stars,

    N. Iwamoto, “Axion Emission From Neutron Stars,” Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 1198–1201 (1984)

  35. [36]

    Neutrino Emission from Neutron Stars

    D. G. Yakovlev, A. D. Kaminker, O. Y. Gnedin, and P. Haensel, “Neutrino emission from neutron stars,” Phys. Rep.354, 1–155 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0012122 [astro-ph]

  36. [37]

    Neutron stars - cooling and transport

    Alexander Y. Potekhin, Jos´ e A. Pons, and Dany Page, “Neutron Stars—Cooling and Transport,” Space Sci. Rev.191, 239–291 (2015), arXiv:1507.06186 [astro-ph.HE]

  37. [38]

    Nuclear Equation of state for Compact Stars and Supernovae

    G. Fiorella Burgio and Anthea F. Fantina, “Nuclear Equation of State for Compact Stars and Supernovae,” inAstrophysics and Space Science Library, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 457, edited by Luciano Rezzolla, Pierre Pizzochero, David Ian Jones, Nanda Rea, and Isaac Vida˜ na (2018) p. 255, arXiv:1804.03020 [nucl-th]

  38. [39]

    Horizons: nuclear astrophysics in the 2020s and be- yond,

    H. Schatz, A. D. Becerril Reyes, and A. Best et al., “Horizons: nuclear astrophysics in the 2020s and be- yond,” J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.49, 110502 (2022), arXiv:2205.07996 [nucl-ex]

  39. [40]

    Pro- duction of unstable heavy neutrinos in proto-neutron stars,

    C. Albertus, M. Masip, and M.A. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, “Pro- duction of unstable heavy neutrinos in proto-neutron stars,” Physics Letters B751, 209–214 (2015)

  40. [41]

    Heavy sterile neu- trinos in stellar core-collapse,

    T. Rembiasz, M. Obergaulinger, M. Masip, M.A. P´ erez- Garc´ ıa, M.A. Aloy, and C. Albertus, “Heavy sterile neu- trinos in stellar core-collapse,” Physical Review D98 (2018), 10.1103/physrevd.98.103010

  41. [42]

    Nonparametric Inference of Neutron Star Composi- tion, Equation of State, and Maximum Mass with GW170817,

    Reed Essick, Philippe Landry, and Daniel E. Holz, “Nonparametric inference of neutron star composition, equation of state, and maximum mass with GW170817,” Phys. Rev. D101, 063007 (2020), arXiv:1910.09740 [astro-ph.HE]

  42. [43]

    The im- pact of the crust equation of state on the analysis of GW170817,

    R. Gamba, J. S. Read, and L. E. Wade, “The im- pact of the crust equation of state on the analysis of GW170817,” Classical and Quantum Gravity37, 025008 (2020), arXiv:1902.04616 [gr-qc]

  43. [44]

    Erratum: Tidal Deformabilities and Radii of Neutron Stars from the Observation of GW170817 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 091102 (2018)],

    Soumi De, Daniel Finstad, James M. Lattimer, Dun- can A. Brown, Edo Berger, and Christopher M. Biwer, “Erratum: Tidal Deformabilities and Radii of Neutron Stars from the Observation of GW170817 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 091102 (2018)],” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 259902 (2018)

  44. [45]

    Tidal deformability with sharp phase transitions in (binary) neutron stars

    Sophia Han and Andrew W. Steiner, “Tidal deformabil- ity with sharp phase transitions in binary neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. D99, 083014 (2019), arXiv:1810.10967 [nucl- th]

  45. [46]

    Structure of Neutron Star with a Quark Core

    G. H. Bordbar, M. Bigdeli, and T. Yazdizadeh, “Struc- ture of Neutron Star with a Quark Core,” International Journal of Modern Physics A21, 5991–6001 (2006), arXiv:0810.2368 [astro-ph]

  46. [47]

    Effects of quark matter nucleation on the evolution of proto-neutron stars

    I. Bombaci, D. Logoteta, C. Providˆ encia, and I. Vida˜ na, “Effects of quark matter nucleation on the evolu- tion of proto-neutron stars,” A&A528, A71 (2011), arXiv:1102.1665 [astro-ph.SR]

  47. [48]

    Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars

    M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Kl¨ ahn, and S. Typel, “Equa- tions of state for supernovae and compact stars,” Reviews of Modern Physics89, 015007 (2017), arXiv:1610.03361 [astro-ph.HE]

  48. [49]

    Oscillatory properties of strange quark stars described by the vector MIT bag model,

    Luiz L. Lopes, Jos´ e C. Jim´ enez, Luis B. Castro, and C´ esar V. Flores, “Oscillatory properties of strange quark stars described by the vector MIT bag model,” European Physical Journal C85, 515 (2025), arXiv:2412.05752 [hep-ph]

  49. [50]

    Robustness of third family solutions for hybrid stars against mixed phase effects

    A. Ayriyan, N. U. Bastian, D. Blaschke, H. Grigorian, K. Maslov, and D. N. Voskresensky, “Robustness of third family solutions for hybrid stars against mixed phase ef- fects,” Phys. Rev. C97, 045802 (2018), arXiv:1711.03926 [nucl-th]

  50. [51]

    Mixed phase transition from hypernuclear matter to de- confined quark matter fulfilling mass-radius constraints of neutron stars,

    M. Shahrbaf, D. Blaschke, and S. Khanmohamadi, “Mixed phase transition from hypernuclear matter to de- confined quark matter fulfilling mass-radius constraints of neutron stars,” Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics 47, 115201 (2020), arXiv:2004.14377 [nucl-th]

  51. [52]

    New extended model of hadrons,

    A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C. B. Thorn, and V. F. Weisskopf, “New extended model of hadrons,” Phys. Rev. D9, 3471–3495 (1974)

  52. [53]

    A field theory Lagrangian for the MIT bag model,

    K. Johnson, “A field theory Lagrangian for the MIT bag model,” Physics Letters B78, 259–262 (1978)

  53. [54]

    Stability windows for proto-quark stars

    V. Dexheimer, J. R. Torres, and D. P. Menezes, “Sta- bility windows for proto-quark stars,” European Physi- cal Journal C73, 2569 (2013), arXiv:1303.5102 [astro- ph.HE]

  54. [55]

    Modified MIT bag Models—part I: Thermodynamic consistency, stability windows and symmetry group,

    Luiz L. Lopes, Carline Biesdorf, and D´ ebora P. Menezes, “Modified MIT bag Models—part I: Thermodynamic consistency, stability windows and symmetry group,” Phys. Scr96, 065303 (2021), arXiv:2005.13136 [hep-ph]

  55. [56]

    Dark matter and bubble nucleation in old neutron stars,

    A. Herrero, M. A. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, J. Silk, and C. Alber- tus, “Dark matter and bubble nucleation in old neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. D100, 103019 (2019)

  56. [57]

    Raffelt,Stars as laboratories for fundamental physics : the astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles(1996)

    Georg G. Raffelt,Stars as laboratories for fundamental physics : the astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles(1996)

  57. [58]

    Medium modification of the charged current neutrino opacity and its implications

    L. F. Roberts, Sanjay Reddy, and Gang Shen, “Medium modification of the charged-current neutrino opacity 9 and its implications,” Phys. Rev. C86, 065803 (2012), arXiv:1205.4066 [astro-ph.HE]

  58. [59]

    Charged current neutrino interactions in hot and dense matter

    Luke F. Roberts and Sanjay Reddy, “Charged cur- rent neutrino interactions in hot and dense matter,” Phys. Rev. C95, 045807 (2017), arXiv:1612.02764 [astro- ph.HE]

  59. [60]

    Signals of the QCD phase transition in core-collapse supernovae

    I. Sagert, T. Fischer, M. Hempel, G. Pagliara, J. Schaffner-Bielich, A. Mezzacappa, F. K. Thielemann, and M. Liebend¨ orfer, “Signals of the QCD Phase Transi- tion in Core-Collapse Supernovae,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 081101 (2009), arXiv:0809.4225 [astro-ph]

  60. [61]

    Vasmer and D

    O. Ivanytskyi, M. ´Angeles P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, V. Sagun, and C. Albertus, “Second look to the polyakov loop nambu–jona-lasinio model at finite baryonic den- sity,” Physical Review D100(2019), 10.1103/phys- revd.100.103020

  61. [62]

    Detecting the QCD phase transition in the next Galactic supernova neutrino burst

    Basudeb Dasgupta, Tobias Fischer, Shunsaku Horiuchi, Matthias Liebend¨ orfer, Alessandro Mirizzi, Irina Sagert, and J¨ urgen Schaffner-Bielich, “Detecting the QCD phase transition in the next Galactic supernova neutrino burst,” Phys. Rev. D81, 103005 (2010), arXiv:0912.2568 [astro-ph.HE]

  62. [63]

    Detectability of neutrino-signal fluctuations in- duced by the hadron-quark phase transition in fail- ing core-collapse supernovae,

    Zidu Lin, Shuai Zha, Evan P. O’Connor, and Andrew W. Steiner, “Detectability of neutrino-signal fluctuations in- duced by the hadron-quark phase transition in fail- ing core-collapse supernovae,” (2023), arXiv:2203.05141 [astro-ph.HE]

  63. [64]

    Three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of the combustion of a neutron star into a quark star

    Matthias Herzog and Friedrich K. R¨ opke, “Three- dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of the combus- tion of a neutron star into a quark star,” Phys. Rev. D 84, 083002 (2011), arXiv:1109.0539 [astro-ph.HE]

  64. [65]

    Combustion of a neutron star into a strange quark star: The neutrino signal

    Giuseppe Pagliara, Matthias Herzog, and Friedrich K. R¨ opke, “Combustion of a neutron star into a strange quark star: The neutrino signal,” Phys. Rev. D87, 103007 (2013), arXiv:1304.6884 [astro-ph.HE]

  65. [66]

    The sce- nario of two families of compact stars: Part 2: Tran- sition from hadronic to quark matter and explosive phe- nomena,

    Alessandro Drago and Giuseppe Pagliara, “The sce- nario of two families of compact stars: Part 2: Tran- sition from hadronic to quark matter and explosive phe- nomena,” The European Physical Journal A52(2016), 10.1140/epja/i2016-16041-2

  66. [67]

    Oscillations among three neutrino types and CP violation,

    L. Wolfenstein, “Oscillations among three neutrino types and CP violation,” Phys. Rev. D18, 958–960 (1978)

  67. [68]

    Resonance en- hancement of oscillations in matter and solar neutrino spectroscopy,

    S. P. Mikheyev and A. Yu. Smirnov, “Resonance en- hancement of oscillations in matter and solar neutrino spectroscopy,” Yadernaya Fizika42, 1441–1448 (1985)

  68. [69]

    The MSW effect and Matter Effects in Neutrino Oscillations

    A. Yu Smirnov, “The MSW Effect and Matter Effects in Neutrino Oscillations,” Physica Scripta Volume T121, 57–64 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0412391 [hep-ph]

  69. [70]

    Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions

    Yasaman Farzan and Mariam T´ ortola, “Neutrino Os- cillations and Non-standard Interactions,” Frontiers in Physics6, 10 (2018), arXiv:1710.09360 [hep-ph]