pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.10519 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-12 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Integrability in Three-Dimensional Gravity: Eigenfunction-Forced KdV Flows

Hamed Adami , Anouchah Latifi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 08:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords three-dimensional gravityChern-Simons formulationforced KdVintegrable hierarchiesboundary dynamicsAdS3Schrödinger eigenfunctionsinverse scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Chiral boundary conditions in three-dimensional gravity reduce to a forced KdV equation with forcing set by Schrödinger eigenfunctions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that three-dimensional gravity in the Chern-Simons formulation with chiral boundary conditions on a non-compact spatial slice produces boundary dynamics governed by the potential modified KdV hierarchy. These dynamics reduce exactly to a forced KdV equation whose forcing term is fixed self-consistently by the eigenfunctions of the associated Schrödinger operator. Solutions are constructed via the inverse scattering transform, separating into a reflectionless sector solved by the Gelfand-Levitan-Marchenko method and a radiative sector with universal dispersive decay. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies an exact integrable description of AdS3 boundary evolution that links gravity directly to known hierarchies and clarifies how solitons and radiation contribute in the dual conformal field theory.

Core claim

Starting from the Chern-Simons formulation, consistent boundary conditions on a non-compact spatial slice lead to boundary dynamics described by the potential modified KdV hierarchy. The dynamics reduce to a forced KdV equation, where the forcing term is determined self-consistently by the eigenfunctions of the associated Schrödinger operator. Using the inverse scattering transform, the reflectionless sector is solved via the Gelfand-Levitan-Marchenko method, while the radiative sector exhibits universal dispersive decay. This framework unifies AdS3 boundary dynamics with integrable hierarchies and elucidates the roles of solitons and radiation in the dual conformal field theory.

What carries the argument

The forced KdV equation whose forcing term is supplied by the eigenfunctions of the Schrödinger operator associated with the boundary data; it encodes the reduction of the Chern-Simons boundary dynamics under the chosen chiral conditions.

If this is right

  • The reflectionless sector admits exact multi-soliton solutions constructed by the Gelfand-Levitan-Marchenko method.
  • The radiative sector decays dispersively in a universal manner independent of initial details.
  • Solitons and radiation acquire distinct interpretations in the dual conformal field theory.
  • The boundary evolution belongs to an integrable hierarchy that can be solved by standard inverse-scattering techniques.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The self-consistent forcing suggests a feedback loop in which boundary eigenstates influence and are influenced by the gravitational degrees of freedom.
  • Analogous reductions may exist for other choices of boundary conditions or for gravity in higher dimensions.
  • Methods developed for forced KdV flows could be imported to compute explicit time-dependent observables on the AdS3 boundary.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen chiral boundary conditions remain consistent under the full time evolution and permit an exact reduction of the boundary dynamics to the forced KdV hierarchy without additional constraints or anomalies.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the time-evolved boundary fields starting from the Chern-Simons action that either reproduces the forced KdV equation with the claimed eigenfunction forcing term or produces a mismatch indicating an inconsistency or anomaly.

read the original abstract

We uncover a direct connection between three-dimensional gravity with chiral boundary conditions and a class of forced integrable systems. Starting from the Chern-Simons formulation, we derive consistent boundary conditions on a non-compact spatial slice, leading to boundary dynamics described by the potential modified KdV hierarchy. The dynamics reduce to a forced KdV equation, where the forcing term is determined self-consistently by the eigenfunctions of the associated Schr\"{o}dinger operator. Using the inverse scattering transform, the reflectionless sector is solved via the Gelfand-Levitan-Marchenko method, while the radiative sector exhibits universal dispersive decay. This framework unifies AdS$_3$ boundary dynamics with integrable hierarchies and elucidates the roles of solitons and radiation in the dual conformal field theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that starting from the Chern-Simons formulation of three-dimensional gravity, consistent chiral boundary conditions on a non-compact spatial slice lead to boundary dynamics governed by the potential modified KdV hierarchy. These dynamics reduce to a forced KdV equation whose forcing term is fixed self-consistently by the eigenfunctions of the associated Schrödinger operator. The reflectionless sector is solved exactly via the Gelfand-Levitan-Marchenko method, while the radiative sector exhibits universal dispersive decay, thereby unifying AdS3 boundary dynamics with integrable hierarchies and their implications for the dual CFT.

Significance. If the reduction steps and boundary-condition consistency are rigorously established, the result would furnish an explicit integrable structure for chiral boundary dynamics in 3D gravity, supplying exact soliton and radiation solutions through inverse scattering that could clarify the holographic dictionary for boundary excitations. The use of standard Chern-Simons reduction and the Gelfand-Levitan-Marchenko method is a strength, but the self-consistent forcing introduces a non-standard closure that requires verification.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and derivation paragraph] Abstract and derivation paragraph: the central claim that the chosen chiral boundary conditions remain invariant under the full time evolution generated by the potential modified KdV hierarchy is asserted rather than derived from the Chern-Simons equations of motion. For a non-compact slice, explicit cancellation of residual boundary terms at spatial infinity must be shown; the self-consistent forcing term may otherwise introduce a hidden constraint that is not automatically preserved under the inverse scattering transform.
  2. [Section on boundary dynamics reduction] Section on boundary dynamics reduction (near Eq. for the forced KdV): the reduction from the potential modified KdV hierarchy to the single forced KdV equation with forcing determined by Schrödinger eigenfunctions is presented as exact, yet no explicit check is given that the resulting system remains closed under the full hierarchy flows without generating additional anomalies or constraints at infinity.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the Schrödinger operator L and its eigenfunctions should be introduced with explicit definitions and domain specifications before the inverse-scattering discussion to improve readability.
  2. A brief comparison with prior literature on integrable boundary dynamics in AdS3 (e.g., works on KdV in holographic contexts) would help situate the novelty of the self-consistent forcing mechanism.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major points raised below and have revised the manuscript to provide the requested explicit verifications while preserving the original derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and derivation paragraph] Abstract and derivation paragraph: the central claim that the chosen chiral boundary conditions remain invariant under the full time evolution generated by the potential modified KdV hierarchy is asserted rather than derived from the Chern-Simons equations of motion. For a non-compact slice, explicit cancellation of residual boundary terms at spatial infinity must be shown; the self-consistent forcing term may otherwise introduce a hidden constraint that is not automatically preserved under the inverse scattering transform.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on rigor for the non-compact case. The invariance follows from the Chern-Simons equations of motion together with the chosen boundary conditions, but we agree an explicit boundary-term calculation strengthens the presentation. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a new paragraph immediately after the derivation of the boundary dynamics that computes the residual terms at spatial infinity. These terms cancel identically once the self-consistent forcing (determined by the Schrödinger eigenfunctions) and the asymptotic decay of the fields are substituted, confirming that no hidden constraint arises and that the conditions remain preserved under the inverse scattering transform. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section on boundary dynamics reduction] Section on boundary dynamics reduction (near Eq. for the forced KdV): the reduction from the potential modified KdV hierarchy to the single forced KdV equation with forcing determined by Schrödinger eigenfunctions is presented as exact, yet no explicit check is given that the resulting system remains closed under the full hierarchy flows without generating additional anomalies or constraints at infinity.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The reduction is obtained directly from the boundary equations, and closure under the hierarchy is guaranteed by the underlying integrability; nevertheless, we have added an explicit verification subsection. Using the asymptotic behavior of the eigenfunctions on the non-compact slice, we show that higher flows applied to the forced KdV equation produce no additional boundary anomalies or constraints at infinity, because the forcing term evolves consistently with the same eigenfunctions. This check is now included near the forced-KdV equation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation from Chern-Simons to eigenfunction-forced KdV hierarchy is self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives consistent boundary conditions directly from the Chern-Simons formulation on a non-compact slice, leading to boundary dynamics that reduce to the potential modified KdV hierarchy and then to a forced KdV equation. The forcing term being determined self-consistently by the Schrödinger eigenfunctions is a physical feature of the setup rather than a definitional loop or fitted input renamed as prediction. No load-bearing step reduces by the paper's own equations to its inputs by construction, and the abstract presents the consistency under time evolution as derived from the starting formulation without reliance on unverified self-citations or smuggled ansatzes. The overall chain remains independent of the target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Chern-Simons formulation of 3D gravity (standard in the field), the existence of consistent chiral boundary conditions on a non-compact slice, and the applicability of the inverse scattering transform to the resulting boundary equation. No explicit free parameters or new invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Chern-Simons formulation provides an equivalent description of 3D gravity
    Invoked at the start of the derivation in the abstract.
  • standard math Inverse scattering transform applies to the forced KdV equation obtained
    Used to solve reflectionless and radiative sectors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5657 in / 1422 out tokens · 29952 ms · 2026-05-18T08:02:19.977609+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages · 28 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at null infinity in three spacetime dimensions

    G. Barnich and G. Compere, “Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at null infinity in three spacetime dimensions,”Class.Quant.Grav.24(2007) F15–F23,gr-qc/0610130

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  2. [2]

    Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, “Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence,”JHEP1005(2010) 062, 1001.1541

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    Entanglement entropy in Galilean conformal field theories and flat holography

    A. Bagchi, R. Basu, D. Grumiller, and M. Riegler, “Entanglement entropy in Galilean conformal field theories and flat holography,”Phys.Rev.Lett.114(2015), no. 11, 111602,1410.4089

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories,

    A. Bagchi, “Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories,”Phys.Rev.Lett.105(2010) 171601

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Flat-Space Chiral Gravity

    A. Bagchi, S. Detournay, and D. Grumiller, “Flat-Space Chiral Gravity,”Phys.Rev.Lett.109(2012) 151301, 1208.1658

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Cosmic evolution from phase transition of 3-dimensional flat space

    A. Bagchi, S. Detournay, D. Grumiller, and J. Simon, “Cosmic Evolution from Phase Transition of Three-Dimensional Flat Space,”Phys.Rev.Lett.111(2013) 181301,1305.2919

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    Holographic positive energy theorems in three-dimensional gravity

    G. Barnich and B. Oblak, “Holographic positive energy theorems in three-dimensional gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 152001,1403.3835

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions: I. Induced representations

    G. Barnich and B. Oblak, “Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions: I. Induced representations,”JHEP 1406(2014) 129,1403.5803

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  9. [9]

    Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory

    A. Bagchi, R. Basu, A. Kakkar, and A. Mehra, “Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory,”JHEP 12(2016) 147,1609.06203

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  10. [10]

    Flat space holography and the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,

    H. Afshar, H. A. González, D. Grumiller, and D. Vassilevich, “Flat space holography and the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,”Phys. Rev. D101(2020), no. 8, 086024,1911.05739

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Yu and B

    Z.-f. Yu and B. Chen, “Free field realization of the BMS Ising model,”JHEP08(2023) 116,2211.06926

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Grumiller and M

    D. Grumiller and M. Riegler, “Carrollian c functions and flat space holographic RG flows in BMS3/CCFT2,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 12, 126008,2309.11539

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,

    A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, and A. Zamolodchikov, “Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,”Nucl.Phys.B241(1984) 333–380

    work page 1984

  14. [14]

    Conformal Invariance and Surface Critical Behavior,

    J. L. Cardy, “Conformal Invariance and Surface Critical Behavior,”Nucl. Phys. B240(1984) 514–532

    work page 1984

  15. [15]

    Operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories,

    J. L. Cardy, “Operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories,”Nucl. Phys.B270(1986) 186–204

    work page 1986

  16. [16]

    Rodríguez, D

    P. Rodríguez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Mapping relativistic to ultra/non-relativistic conformal symmetries in 2D and finite √ T Tdeformations,”JHEP11(2021) 133,2106.09750

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,”Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207–226. – 26 –

    work page 1986

  18. [18]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The largeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,hep-th/9711200

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  19. [19]

    Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy,”Phys. Lett.B379 (1996) 99–104,hep-th/9601029

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  20. [20]

    New Boundary Conditions for AdS3

    G. Compère, W. Song, and A. Strominger, “New Boundary Conditions forAdS3,”JHEP1305(2013) 152, 1303.2662

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    Boundary conditions for General Relativity on AdS$_{3}$ and the KdV hierarchy

    A. Pérez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Boundary conditions for General Relativity on AdS3 and the KdV hierarchy,”JHEP06(2016) 103,1605.04490

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    Integrable systems with BMS$_{3}$ Poisson structure and the dynamics of locally flat spacetimes

    O. Fuentealba, J. Matulich, A. Pérez, M. Pino, P. Rodríguez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Integrable systems with BMS3 Poisson structure and the dynamics of locally flat spacetimes,”JHEP01(2018) 148, 1711.02646

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    Revisiting the asymptotic dynamics of General Relativity on AdS$_3$

    H. A. González, J. Matulich, M. Pino, and R. Troncoso, “Revisiting the asymptotic dynamics of General Relativity on AdS3,”JHEP12(2018) 115,1809.02749

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Boundary conditions for General Relativity in three-dimensional spacetimes, integrable systems and the KdV/mKdV hierarchies,

    E. Ojeda and A. Pérez, “Boundary conditions for General Relativity in three-dimensional spacetimes, integrable systems and the KdV/mKdV hierarchies,”JHEP08(2019) 079,1906.11226

    work page arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Integrable Systems and Spacetime Dynamics,

    M. Cárdenas, F. Correa, K. Lara, and M. Pino, “Integrable Systems and Spacetime Dynamics,”Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021), no. 16, 161601,2104.09676

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Generalized Fefferman-Graham gauge and boundary Weyl structures,

    G. Arenas-Henriquez, F. Diaz, and D. Rivera-Betancour, “Generalized Fefferman-Graham gauge and boundary Weyl structures,”JHEP02(2025) 007,2411.12513

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Grumiller and W

    D. Grumiller and W. Merbis, “Near horizon dynamics of three dimensional black holes,”SciPost Phys.8 (2020), no. 1, 010,1906.10694

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Integrable ponderomotive system: cavitons are solitons,

    D. Kaup, “Integrable ponderomotive system: cavitons are solitons,”Physical review letters59(1987), no. 18, 2063

    work page 1987

  29. [29]

    On the interaction of langmuir waves with acoustic waves in plasmas,

    A. Latifi and J. Leon, “On the interaction of langmuir waves with acoustic waves in plasmas,”Physics Letters A152(1991), no. 3-4, 171–178

    work page 1991

  30. [30]

    Solution of an initial-boundary value problem for coupled nonlinear waves,

    J. Leon and A. Latifi, “Solution of an initial-boundary value problem for coupled nonlinear waves,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General23(1990), no. 8, 1385

    work page 1990

  31. [31]

    A class of integrable nonlinear evolution equations driven exclusively by extrinsic quadratic effects,

    A. Latifi, “A class of integrable nonlinear evolution equations driven exclusively by extrinsic quadratic effects,”Transactions in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics2(2025), no. 1, 8–21

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Asymptotic permanent profile of the ion acoustic wave driven by the langmuir wave,

    D. Kaup, A. Latifi, and J. Leon, “Asymptotic permanent profile of the ion acoustic wave driven by the langmuir wave,”Physics Letters A168(1992), no. 2, 120–126

    work page 1992

  33. [33]

    A simple derivation of canonical structure and quasi-local hamiltonians in general relativity,

    J. Kijowski, “A simple derivation of canonical structure and quasi-local hamiltonians in general relativity,” General Relativity and Gravitation29(1997), no. 3, 307–343

    work page 1997

  34. [34]

    Positivity of Quasilocal Mass

    C.-C. M. Liu and S.-T. Yau, “Positivity of Quasilocal Mass,”Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003) 231102, gr-qc/0303019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  35. [35]

    Quasi-Local Energy-Momentum and Angular Momentum in GR: A Review Article,

    L. B. Szabados, “Quasi-Local Energy-Momentum and Angular Momentum in GR: A Review Article,”Living Rev. Rel.7(2004) 4

    work page 2004

  36. [36]

    Spacetime structure near generic horizons and soft hair,

    D. Grumiller, A. Pérez, M. Sheikh-Jabbari, R. Troncoso, and C. Zwikel, “Spacetime structure near generic horizons and soft hair,”Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 4, 041601,1908.09833

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    T-Witts from the horizon,

    H. Adami, D. Grumiller, S. Sadeghian, M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and C. Zwikel, “T-Witts from the horizon,” JHEP04(2020) 128,2002.08346

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Symmetries at null boundaries: two and three dimensional gravity cases,

    H. Adami, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, V. Taghiloo, H. Yavartanoo, and C. Zwikel, “Symmetries at null boundaries: two and three dimensional gravity cases,”JHEP10(2020) 107,2007.12759

    work page arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    Chiral Massive News: Null Boundary Symmetries in Topologically Massive Gravity,

    H. Adami, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, V. Taghiloo, H. Yavartanoo, and C. Zwikel, “Chiral Massive News: Null Boundary Symmetries in Topologically Massive Gravity,”JHEP05(2021) 261,2104.03992. – 27 –

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Adami, D

    H. Adami, D. Grumiller, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, V. Taghiloo, H. Yavartanoo, and C. Zwikel, “Null boundary phase space: slicings, news & memory,”JHEP11(2021) 155,2110.04218

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Symmetries at causal boundaries in 2D and 3D gravity,

    H. Adami, P. Mao, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, V. Taghiloo, and H. Yavartanoo, “Symmetries at causal boundaries in 2D and 3D gravity,”JHEP05(2022) 189,2202.12129

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Characteristic forms and geometric invariants,

    S.-S. Chern and J. Simons, “Characteristic forms and geometric invariants,”Annals Math.99(1974) 48–69

    work page 1974

  43. [43]

    The partition function of degenerate quadratic functional and Ray-Singer invariants,

    A. S. Schwarz, “The partition function of degenerate quadratic functional and Ray-Singer invariants,”Lett. Math. Phys.2(1978) 247–252

    work page 1978

  44. [44]

    (2+1)-dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system,

    E. Witten, “(2+1)-dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system,”Nucl. Phys.B311(1988) 46

    work page 1988

  45. [45]

    A stress tensor for anti-de sitter gravity,

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, “A stress tensor for anti-de sitter gravity,”Communications in Mathematical Physics208(1999), no. 2, 413–428

    work page 1999

  46. [46]

    The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. Maldacena, “The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”International journal of theoretical physics38(1999), no. 4, 1113–1133

    work page 1999

  47. [47]

    Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited

    E. Witten, “Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited,”0706.3359

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Most general AdS_3 boundary conditions

    D. Grumiller and M. Riegler, “Most general AdS3 boundary conditions,”JHEP10(2016) 023,1608.01308

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves,

    P. D. Lax, “Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves,”Communications on pure and applied mathematics21(1968), no. 5, 467–490

    work page 1968

  50. [50]

    The motion integrals for the KdV equation and related inverse problems,

    M. Novitskii, “The motion integrals for the KdV equation and related inverse problems,”Inverse problems 12(1996), no. 1, 55

    work page 1996

  51. [51]

    A Simple model of the integrable Hamiltonian equation,

    F. Magri, “A Simple model of the integrable Hamiltonian equation,”J. Math. Phys.19(1978) 1156–1162

    work page 1978

  52. [52]

    P. J. Olver,Applications of Lie groups to differential equations, vol. 107. Springer Science & Business Media, 1993

    work page 1993

  53. [53]

    Water wave propagation over uneven bottoms,

    M. W. Dingemans, “Water wave propagation over uneven bottoms,”Delft University of Technology, TU Delft(1994)

    work page 1994

  54. [54]

    Water wave propagation over uneven bottoms–part1–linear wave propagation,

    M. Dinguemans, “Water wave propagation over uneven bottoms–part1–linear wave propagation,”Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering13(1997)

    work page 1997

  55. [55]

    M. W. Dingemans,Water wave propagation over uneven bottoms (in 2 parts), vol. 13. World Scientific, 1997

    work page 1997

  56. [56]

    The nonlinear schr\

    A. Fokas and A. Latifi, “The nonlinear schr\" odinger equation with forcing involving products of eigenfunctions,”Open Communications in Nonlinear Mathematical Physics2(2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    The korteweg–de vries equation with forcing involving products of eigenfunctions,

    A. Fokas and A. Latifi, “The korteweg–de vries equation with forcing involving products of eigenfunctions,” J. Of Math. Phy., Anal., Geom19(2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    On the determination of a differential equation from its spectral function,

    I. M. Gel’fand and B. M. Levitan, “On the determination of a differential equation from its spectral function,”Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Matematicheskaya15(1951), no. 4, 309–360

    work page 1951

  59. [59]

    Concerning the theory of a differential operator of the second order,

    V. Marchenko, “Concerning the theory of a differential operator of the second order,” inDoklady Akad. Nauk SSSR.(NS), vol. 72, pp. 457–460. 1950

    work page 1950

  60. [60]

    Method for solving the korteweg-devries equation,

    C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, and R. M. Miura, “Method for solving the korteweg-devries equation,”Physical review letters19(1967), no. 19, 1095

    work page 1967

  61. [61]

    Solitons and the inverse scattering transform,

    H. Segur, “Solitons and the inverse scattering transform,” tech. rep., 1980

    work page 1980

  62. [62]

    M. J. Ablowitz and H. Segur,Solitons and the inverse scattering transform. SIAM, 1981

    work page 1981

  63. [63]

    L. D. Faddeev and L. A. Takhtajan,Hamiltonian methods in the theory of solitons, vol. 23. Springer, 1987

    work page 1987

  64. [64]

    P. G. Drazin and R. S. Johnson,Solitons: an introduction, vol. 2. Cambridge university press, 1989

    work page 1989

  65. [65]

    Babelon, D

    O. Babelon, D. Bernard, and M. Talon,Introduction to classical integrable systems. Cambridge University Press, 2003

    work page 2003

  66. [66]

    V. A. Marchenko,Sturm-Liouville operators and applications, vol. 373. American Mathematical Soc., 2011. – 28 –

    work page 2011

  67. [67]

    Expectation value of composite field $T{\bar T}$ in two-dimensional quantum field theory

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory,”hep-th/0401146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    On space of integrable quantum field theories

    F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “On space of integrable quantum field theories,”Nucl. Phys. B 915(2017) 363–383,1608.05499

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    $T \bar{T}$-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories

    A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. M. Szécsényi, and R. Tateo, “T¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories,”JHEP10 (2016) 112,1608.05534

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    Moving the CFT into the bulk with $T\bar T$

    L. McGough, M. Mezei, and H. Verlinde, “Moving the CFT into the bulk withTT,”JHEP04(2018) 010, 1611.03470

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    An integrable Lorentz-breaking deformation of two-dimensional CFTs

    M. Guica, “An integrable Lorentz-breaking deformation of two-dimensional CFTs,”SciPost Phys.5(2018), no. 5, 048,1710.08415

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  72. [72]

    $T\bar T$-deformations in closed form

    G. Bonelli, N. Doroud, and M. Zhu, “T¯T-deformations in closed form,”JHEP06(2018) 149,1804.10967

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  73. [73]

    Holography at finite cutoff with a $T^2$ deformation

    T. Hartman, J. Kruthoff, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “Holography at finite cutoff with aT2 deformation,”JHEP03(2019) 004,1807.11401

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    The $T\overline T$ deformation of quantum field theory as random geometry

    J. Cardy, “TheTTdeformation of quantum field theory as random geometry,”JHEP10(2018) 186, 1801.06895

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [75]

    The $\textrm{T}\bar{\textrm{T}}$ perturbation and its geometric interpretation

    R. Conti, S. Negro, and R. Tateo, “TheTTperturbation and its geometric interpretation,”JHEP02(2019) 085,1809.09593

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Heating up holography for single-traceJ¯Tdeformations,

    L. Apolo and W. Song, “Heating up holography for single-traceJ¯Tdeformations,”JHEP01(2020) 141, 1907.03745

    work page arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    Solving a family of $T\bar{T}$-like theories

    B. Le Floch and M. Mezei, “Solving a family ofT¯T-like theories,”1903.07606

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  78. [78]

    Infinite pseudo-conformal symmetries of classicalT¯T,J ¯TandJ T a - deformed CFTs,

    M. Guica and R. Monten, “Infinite pseudo-conformal symmetries of classicalT¯T,J ¯TandJ T a - deformed CFTs,”SciPost Phys.11(2021), no. 4, 078,2011.05445

    work page arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    TTdeformation of classical Liouville field theory,

    M. Leoni, “TTdeformation of classical Liouville field theory,”JHEP07(2020), no. 07, 230,2005.08906

    work page arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    Correlation functions of CFTs on a torus with aTTdeformation,

    S. He and Y. Sun, “Correlation functions of CFTs on a torus with aTTdeformation,”Phys. Rev. D102 (2020), no. 2, 026023,2004.07486

    work page arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.