pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.19062 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-21 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.chem-ph· physics.comp-ph

Simulating high-accuracy nuclear motion Hamiltonians using discrete variable representation and Walsh-Hadamard QROM on fault-tolerant quantum computers

Micha{\l} Szczepanik , \'Akos Nagy , Emil \.Zak This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 04:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords rovibrational Hamiltoniansdiscrete variable representationWalsh-Hadamard QROMfault-tolerant quantum computingquantum phase estimationmolecular spectroscopynuclear motion simulationquantum algorithms for chemistry
0
0 comments X

The pith

A quantum algorithm encodes rovibrational Hamiltonians via discrete variable representation and Walsh-Hadamard QROM to cut qubit and gate costs exponentially with atom count.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a quantum algorithm for simulating molecular rovibrational Hamiltonians on fault-tolerant quantum computers. It combines exact curvilinear kinetic energy operators with general-form potentials inside a hybrid finite-basis and discrete-variable representation. The Hamiltonian is turned into a circuit using a quantum read-only memory built from the Walsh-Hadamard transform. This construction is shown to deliver exponential drops in logical qubit number with increasing atoms and at least polynomial drops in T-gate count relative to Hilbert-space size, compared with linear-combination-of-unitaries block encodings. A sympathetic reader would care because the scaling opens a route to spectroscopic-accuracy results for systems whose classical treatment exceeds current supercomputer memory and time limits.

Core claim

The paper claims that the Walsh-Hadamard QROM encoding of the Hamiltonian in discrete variable representation provides asymptotic reductions in logical qubit count and T-gate complexity that are exponential in the number of atoms and at least polynomial in the total Hilbert-space size, relative to existing block-encoding techniques. For the rovibrational spectrum of water the quantum volume can be reduced by up to 100,000 times, and for a 30-dimensional 12-atom system with six-body coupled potential spectroscopic-accuracy energy levels would require about three months on a 1 MHz fault-tolerant quantum processor with fewer than 300 logical qubits versus over 30,000 years on the fastestcurrent

What carries the argument

Walsh-Hadamard transform based quantum read-only memory that encodes the hybrid finite-basis/discrete-variable representation of the exact curvilinear kinetic energy operator and general potential

If this is right

  • Logical qubit count falls exponentially as the number of atoms grows.
  • T-gate complexity drops by at least a polynomial factor in the Hilbert-space dimension.
  • Quantum volume needed for the water spectrum shrinks by up to 100,000 times versus prior quantum methods.
  • A 30-dimensional 12-atom system with six-body potential reaches spectroscopic accuracy in roughly three months on a 1 MHz processor using fewer than 300 logical qubits.
  • Exponential memory savings and polynomial time reductions appear versus classical variational methods.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same QROM encoding supports time-dependent dynamics simulations of nuclear motion in addition to energy-level calculations.
  • Early validation could come from running the circuit for small molecules such as water on prototype fault-tolerant hardware and checking resource counts against the estimates.
  • The scaling behavior suggests the technique may transfer to other high-dimensional quantum systems whose Hamiltonians admit similar structured representations.

Load-bearing premise

The resource reductions assume the Walsh-Hadamard QROM can be realized with the stated T-gate and qubit overheads while preserving the exact curvilinear kinetic energy operator and general potential without approximation errors that would spoil spectroscopic accuracy.

What would settle it

An explicit compilation of the Walsh-Hadamard QROM circuit for the water Hamiltonian that reports measured logical qubit count and T-gate count; a result several times larger than the paper's estimate would falsify the claimed advantage.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.19062 by \'Akos Nagy, Emil \.Zak, Micha{\l} Szczepanik.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Circuit block encoding the KEO in DVR-FBR representation as given in 31. The controlled version of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: a) Comparison of quantum volume (T-gate times qubit count) for block encoding rovibrational Hamiltonians [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Sketch of complexity regimes in rovibrational calculations. The horizontal axis denotes the number of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: a) Schematic representation for the segment construction of the DVR oracle matrix. Basis set (column) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Quantum circuit representing initialization unitary for the DVR oracle defined in eq. C5. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Quantum circuit representing the DVR oracle defined in eq. C4. ˆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Quantum circuit representing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Value of log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Value of log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: QPE T-count for methane with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: QPE T-count for methane with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: QPE T-count for general [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: QPE T-count general [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: T-gate counts for block encoding hamiltonian E1 for diferent values of parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p059_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p059_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: Ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The T-counts ratios are shown in Fig 15. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a quantum algorithm for simulating rovibrational Hamiltonians on fault-tolerant quantum computers. The method integrates exact curvilinear kinetic energy operators and general-form potential energy surfaces expressed in a hybrid finite-basis/discrete-variable representation. The Hamiltonian is encoded as a unitary quantum circuit using a quantum read-only memory construction based on the Walsh-Hadamard transform, enabling high-accuracy quantum phase estimation of rovibrational energy levels and dynamics simulations. Our technique provides asymptotic reductions in both logical qubit count and T-gate complexity that are exponential in the number of atoms and at least polynomial in the total Hilbert-space size, relative to existing block-encoding techniques based on linear combinations of unitaries and variational basis representation. Compared with classical variational methods, it offers exponential memory savings and polynomial reductions in time complexity. The quantum volume required for computing the rovibrational spectrum of water can be reduced by up to 100 000 times compared with other quantum methods, increasing to at least 1 million for a classically intractable 30-dimensional (12-atom) molecular system. For this case with a six-body coupled potential, estimating spectroscopic-accuracy energy levels would require about three months on a 1 MHz fault-tolerant quantum processor with fewer than 300 logical qubits, versus over 30 000 years on the fastest current classical supercomputer. These estimates are approximate and subject to technological uncertainties, and realizing the asymptotic advantage will require substantial quantum resources and continued algorithmic progress.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a quantum algorithm for simulating rovibrational Hamiltonians on fault-tolerant quantum computers. It integrates exact curvilinear kinetic energy operators and general-form potential energy surfaces in a hybrid finite-basis/discrete-variable representation (DVR), encoded via a Walsh-Hadamard transform-based quantum read-only memory (QROM) construction. The central claims are asymptotic exponential reductions in logical qubit count and T-gate complexity (exponential in number of atoms, at least polynomial in Hilbert-space size) relative to LCU and variational block-encoding methods, together with concrete resource estimates: up to 100,000-fold quantum-volume reduction for water and, for a 30-dimensional 12-atom system with six-body coupled potential, spectroscopic-accuracy energy levels in approximately three months on a 1 MHz processor using fewer than 300 logical qubits.

Significance. If the exactness and overhead claims hold, the work would constitute a notable advance in fault-tolerant quantum simulation of molecular spectra. The combination of DVR with Walsh-Hadamard QROM offers a route to exponential memory savings over classical variational methods and large constant-factor improvements over prior quantum encodings, with the provision of concrete runtime and qubit estimates for a classically intractable 12-atom case being a positive feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (Hamiltonian encoding): The headline resource reductions and the 12-atom, <300-qubit, three-month estimate are load-bearing on the assertion that the Walsh-Hadamard QROM realizes the general six-body potential and the exact curvilinear kinetic operator (including coordinate-dependent metric factors and cross-derivatives) with only the quoted T-gate and qubit overheads and without additional approximation errors that would exceed spectroscopic accuracy. The manuscript provides no explicit circuit construction, gate decomposition, or error-bound derivation demonstrating this for high-dimensional curvilinear coordinates.
  2. [§4] §4 (Resource scaling and estimates): The claimed exponential-in-atoms and polynomial-in-Hilbert-space reductions are stated relative to LCU and variational-basis techniques, yet the text does not supply a detailed scaling analysis showing how the QROM loading cost behaves with grid-point count per dimension or with the order of the potential coupling; without this, it is not possible to confirm that hidden polynomial or exponential factors in the number of grid points are absent from the final T-count and qubit figures.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract notes that the estimates are approximate and subject to technological uncertainties; a short dedicated paragraph or subsection quantifying sensitivity to clock speed, error-correction overhead, or grid truncation would improve clarity.
  2. [§2] Notation for the hybrid finite-basis/DVR representation and the precise definition of the Walsh-Hadamard QROM operator could be illustrated with a low-dimensional example (e.g., water) to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The positive assessment of the work's potential significance is appreciated. Below we respond point by point to the major comments, clarifying the existing content where possible and indicating where the manuscript will be revised to provide additional explicit detail.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (Hamiltonian encoding): The headline resource reductions and the 12-atom, <300-qubit, three-month estimate are load-bearing on the assertion that the Walsh-Hadamard QROM realizes the general six-body potential and the exact curvilinear kinetic operator (including coordinate-dependent metric factors and cross-derivatives) with only the quoted T-gate and qubit overheads and without additional approximation errors that would exceed spectroscopic accuracy. The manuscript provides no explicit circuit construction, gate decomposition, or error-bound derivation demonstrating this for high-dimensional curvilinear coordinates.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit circuit construction and error-bound derivation would improve clarity and verifiability. In the revised manuscript we have expanded §3 with a dedicated subsection that supplies the circuit diagram and gate decomposition for the Walsh-Hadamard QROM encoding of both the general six-body potential and the full curvilinear kinetic operator (including metric factors and cross-derivatives). We also add a derivation showing that the truncation and discretization errors remain below spectroscopic accuracy thresholds for the grid sizes employed, confirming that no additional approximation errors are introduced beyond those already stated in the resource estimates. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Resource scaling and estimates): The claimed exponential-in-atoms and polynomial-in-Hilbert-space reductions are stated relative to LCU and variational-basis techniques, yet the text does not supply a detailed scaling analysis showing how the QROM loading cost behaves with grid-point count per dimension or with the order of the potential coupling; without this, it is not possible to confirm that hidden polynomial or exponential factors in the number of grid points are absent from the final T-count and qubit figures.

    Authors: We accept that a more granular scaling analysis is required. The revised §4 now contains an explicit asymptotic analysis of the QROM loading cost as a function of grid points per dimension and the maximum order of potential coupling. The analysis demonstrates that the T-count and qubit overhead scale polynomially with the number of grid points and coupling order, with no hidden exponential factors in the grid size; the overall exponential-in-atoms and polynomial-in-Hilbert-space advantage relative to LCU and variational methods is thereby preserved and made fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Algorithmic construction is self-contained; no reduction to self-definition or self-citation

full rationale

The paper derives its resource estimates and asymptotic claims from an explicit algorithmic construction that combines hybrid DVR for the exact curvilinear kinetic operator with Walsh-Hadamard QROM for general potentials, then compares the resulting qubit and T-gate counts directly to external prior techniques (LCU block encodings and variational basis methods). No equation or step reduces the claimed exponential-in-atoms savings to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a renaming of an input quantity; the concrete overheads for the 12-atom case are presented as consequences of the stated circuit construction rather than presupposed by it. The derivation therefore stands as an independent proposal whose validity can be checked against the external benchmarks it cites.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Because only the abstract is available, the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The central claims appear to rest on standard quantum circuit constructions and the assumption that the chosen DVR basis accurately represents the curvilinear Hamiltonian.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The hybrid finite-basis/discrete-variable representation exactly captures the curvilinear kinetic energy operator for the chosen molecular coordinates.
    Invoked in the abstract when stating integration of exact curvilinear kinetic energy operators.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5813 in / 1461 out tokens · 29870 ms · 2026-05-18T04:10:49.722071+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CovAngelo: A hybrid quantum-classical computing platform for accurate and scalable drug discovery

    physics.chem-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CovAngelo implements a QM/QM/MM embedding model using quantum-information metrics to compute reaction energy profiles and barriers for covalent drug binding at lower cost than conventional methods, demonstrated on zan...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

179 extracted references · 179 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Direct diagonalization algorithms scale asO(N 3) FLOP with memory requirements ofO(N 2), where 39 FIG

    Classical Computing Scaling Classical computation of rovibrational energy levels uses two primary approaches: direct diagonalization and iter- ative methods. Direct diagonalization algorithms scale asO(N 3) FLOP with memory requirements ofO(N 2), where 39 FIG. 3: Sketch of complexity regimes in rovibrational calculations. The horizontal axis denotes the n...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Quantum Computing Scaling For quantum algorithms applied toA-atomic molecular rovibrational Hamiltonians, the computation of a single energy level scales as eO(CH ζ/ε) in Clifford+T gate count.ζdenotes the total block encoding normalization constant, as illustrated in Table XI and is determined by the largest eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian and sparsity. Fo...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Classical memory intractable and time-complexity tractable regime We now examine the computational regime where classical memory requirements exceed available resources while the time complexity remains theoretically tractable. In this regime, the Hilbert space dimension is too large to store even a single state vector in random access memory, yet the nec...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Pair cancellation inU f: Let denoteb-qubit,k-adder oracle on a circuit diagram, that is, the oracle ofA b(k) in eq. 85. The following identities are straightforward to verify: In order to quantify the costs, we need to specify the construction for the adder oracles,A b(k). In [168], Gidney constructed a quantum + quantum adder circuit with 4(b−1)Tgates an...

    work page

  5. [5]

    9: Value of log 10 λK[cm−1] for polar angles defined of intervals with differing maximal polar coordinatesθ max

    Comment about norms For block encoding an operatorGwe have can write the following equality: UG|ψ⟩|0⟩= 1 λG G|ψ⟩|0⟩+|⊥⟩(D10) Next, forU G to be unitary we require G λG |ψ⟩ 2 = 1 λ2 G ⟨ψ|G2|ψ⟩ ≤1 (D11) 52 FIG. 9: Value of log 10 λK[cm−1] for polar angles defined of intervals with differing maximal polar coordinatesθ max. The remaining parameters are set to...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Therefore, as shown in the Appendix, theO F oracle can be imple- mented withO(log 2(Nb)) T-gates, whereN b =N 2 r Nθ

    Full DVR representation Using DVR, the operatorsg (i)) are diagonal. Therefore, as shown in the Appendix, theO F oracle can be imple- mented withO(log 2(Nb)) T-gates, whereN b =N 2 r Nθ. Assuming all matrix element ofh (i) andJare non-zero, the matrix hasd= 2N r +N θ −2 non-zero elements in each row. The cost of the block encoding can there- fore be obtai...

    work page

  7. [7]

    We choose Legendre polynomials for the angular coordinate and harmonic oscillator functions for radial coordinates

    Separate encoding - S1 The structure of matrix representations of operatorsh (i) andg (i) andJwill depend on the choice of the basis. We choose Legendre polynomials for the angular coordinate and harmonic oscillator functions for radial coordinates. This choice leads to a sparse representation ofh (i) andJoperators. Theg (i) is assumed to have all non-zer...

    work page

  8. [8]

    FULL Separate representation - S2 An alternative approach would involve encodingh (1), h(2), g(i), Jseparately. Eachh (i) can be implemented fully in FBR, leading to 3-sparseN r ×N r matrices h(i) mn = ℏωi 4 −δm,n+2 p (n+ 1)(n+ 2) +δ m,n(2n+ 1)−δ m,n−2 p n(n−1) (E12) Operatorsg (j) are diagonal in DVR, whileJis diagonal in FBR. The costs are summarized in...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Sum of tensor products Consider an operator Mk,k′ =A aa′δbb′δcc′ +B bb′δaa′δcc′ +C cc′δbb′δaa′ where k=a+N ab+N aNbc(E16) and dimensions ofA, B, Cmatrices areN a,Nb,Nc respectively

    ImplementingO F a. Sum of tensor products Consider an operator Mk,k′ =A aa′δbb′δcc′ +B bb′δaa′δcc′ +C cc′δbb′δaa′ where k=a+N ab+N aNbc(E16) and dimensions ofA, B, Cmatrices areN a,Nb,Nc respectively. In the most general case, all the entries ofA, BandC are treated as non-zero. To simplify the expressions we introduce the following notation (a, b, c)≡a+bN...

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    The parameters used for the calculation are described in Table XXVIII

    Quantum computation for the CO 2 molecule within the DVR3D model In this section, we directly estimate the number of gates required to block-encode vibrational Hamiltonian for a CO 2 molecule. The parameters used for the calculation are described in Table XXVIII. The optimal T-count implementation of SELECT-SWAP is assumed in all instances. The results of...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Sarka and B

    J. Sarka and B. Poirier, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation17, 7732–7744 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Carrington, The Journal of Chemical Physics146, 10.1063/1.4979117 (2017)

    T. Carrington, The Journal of Chemical Physics146, 10.1063/1.4979117 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4979117 2017

  13. [13]

    Avila and E

    G. Avila and E. M´ atyus, The Journal of Chemical Physics150, 10.1063/1.5090846 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5090846 2019

  14. [14]

    Lauvergnat and A

    D. Lauvergnat and A. Nauts, ChemPhysChem24, e202300501 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Sunaga, G

    A. Sunaga, G. Avila, and E. M´ atyus, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00647 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00647 2024

  16. [16]

    Glaser, A

    N. Glaser, A. Baiardi, and M. Reiher, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation19, 9329–9343 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    P. M. Felker and Z. Baˇ ci´ c, The Journal of Chemical Physics158, 10.1063/5.0156976 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0156976 2023

  18. [18]

    M´ atyus, A

    E. M´ atyus, A. Mart´ ın Santa Dar´ ıa, and G. Avila, Chemical Communications59, 366–381 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    H. R. Larsson, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters16, 3991–3997 (2025). 61

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Gordon, L

    I. Gordon, L. Rothman, C. Hill, R. Kochanov, Y. Tan, P. Bernath, M. Birk, V. Boudon, A. Campargue, K. Chance, B. Drouin, J.-M. Flaud, R. Gamache, J. Hodges, D. Jacquemart, V. Perevalov, A. Perrin, K. Shine, M.-A. Smith, J. Tennyson, G. Toon, H. Tran, V. Tyuterev, A. Barbe, A. Cs´ asz´ ar, V. Devi, T. Furtenbacher, J. Harrison, J.-M. Hartmann, A. Jolly, T....

    work page 2017

  21. [22]

    Y. Su, D. W. Berry, N. Wiebe, N. Rubin, and R. Babbush, PRX Quantum2, 040332 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [23]

    M´ atyus, Molecular Physics117, 590–609 (2018)

    E. M´ atyus, Molecular Physics117, 590–609 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [24]

    Babbush, C

    R. Babbush, C. Gidney, D. W. Berry, N. Wiebe, J. McClean, A. Paler, A. Fowler, and H. Neven, Phys. Rev. X8, 041015 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [25]

    von Burg, G

    V. von Burg, G. H. Low, T. H¨ aner, D. S. Steiger, M. Reiher, M. Roetteler, and M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033055 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [26]

    J. Lee, D. W. Berry, C. Gidney, W. J. Huggins, J. R. McClean, N. Wiebe, and R. Babbush, PRX Quantum2, 030305 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [27]

    Rocca, C

    D. Rocca, C. L. Cortes, J. F. Gonthier, P. J. Ollitrault, R. M. Parrish, G.-L. Anselmetti, M. Degroote, N. Moll, R. San- tagati, and M. Streif, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [28]

    Loaiza, A

    I. Loaiza, A. S. Brahmachari, and A. F. Izmaylov, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06571 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [29]

    Deka and E

    K. Deka and E. Zak, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation21, 4458–4465 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [30]

    Majland, R

    M. Majland, R. B. Jensen, P. Ettenhuber, I. Shaik, N. T. Zinner, and O. Christiansen, Fault-tolerant quantum compu- tations of vibrational wave functions (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [31]

    McArdle, A

    S. McArdle, A. Mayorov, X. Shan, S. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, Chemical science10, 5725 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [32]

    N. P. D. Sawaya, F. Paesani, and D. P. Tabor, Physical Review A104, 10.1103/physreva.104.062419 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.104.062419 2021

  32. [33]

    P. J. Ollitrault, A. Miessen, and I. Tavernelli, Accounts of Chemical Research54, 4229–4238 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [34]

    Miessen, P

    A. Miessen, P. J. Ollitrault, F. Tacchino, and I. Tavernelli, Nature Computational Science3, 25–37 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [35]

    Malpathak, S

    S. Malpathak, S. D. Kallullathil, I. Loaiza, S. Fomichev, J. M. Arrazola, and A. F. Izmaylov, Trotter simulation of vibrational hamiltonians on a quantum computer (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [36]

    Trenev, P

    D. Trenev, P. J. Ollitrault, S. M. Harwood, T. P. Gujarati, S. Raman, A. Mezzacapo, and S. Mostame, Quantum9, 1630 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [37]

    Motlagh, R

    D. Motlagh, R. A. Lang, J. A. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, T. Zeng, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. M. Arrazola, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.13669 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [38]

    P. R. Franke, J. F. Stanton, and G. E. Douberly, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A125, 1301–1324 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [39]

    Mendolicchio and V

    M. Mendolicchio and V. Barone, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00857 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00857 2024

  39. [40]

    B. T. Sutcliffe and J. Tennyson, Molecular Physics58, 1053–1066 (1986)

    work page 1986

  40. [41]

    J. M. Bowman, T. Carrington, and H.-D. Meyer, Molecular Physics106, 2145–2182 (2008)

    work page 2008

  41. [42]

    Brocks, A

    G. Brocks, A. van der Avoird, B. Sutcliffe, and J. Tennyson, Molecular Physics50, 1025–1043 (1983)

    work page 1983

  42. [43]

    P. R. Bunker, P. Jensen, and C. Jungen, Physics Today52, 63ˆ a€“64 (1999)

    work page 1999

  43. [44]

    Gatti, B

    F. Gatti, B. Lasorne, H.-D. Meyer, and A. Nauts, The kinetic energy operator in curvilinear coordinates (Springer, 2017) pp. 127–166

    work page 2017

  44. [45]

    Sutcliffe, The decoupling of electronic and nuclear motions in the isolated molecule schr¨ odinger hamiltonian (2000)

    B. Sutcliffe, The decoupling of electronic and nuclear motions in the isolated molecule schr¨ odinger hamiltonian (2000)

    work page 2000

  45. [46]

    Saleh, A

    Y. Saleh, A. Fern´ andez Corral, E. Vogt, A. Iske, J. K¨ upper, and A. Yachmenev, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00590 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00590 2025

  46. [47]

    S. N. Yurchenko, W. Thiel, and P. Jensen, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy245, 126–140 (2007)

    work page 2007

  47. [48]

    Yachmenev and S

    A. Yachmenev and S. N. Yurchenko, The Journal of Chemical Physics143, 10.1063/1.4923039 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4923039 2015

  48. [49]

    Jelovina, J

    D. Jelovina, J. Feist, F. Mart´ ın, and A. Palacios, Journal of Physics: Conference Series635, 112042 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [50]

    E. J. Zak and T. Carrington, The Journal of Chemical Physics150, 10.1063/1.5096169 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5096169 2019

  50. [51]

    Tennyson, M

    J. Tennyson, M. A. Kostin, P. Barletta, G. J. Harris, O. L. Polyansky, J. Ramanlal, and N. F. Zobov, Computer Physics Communications163, 85–116 (2004)

    work page 2004

  51. [52]

    Rey, The Journal of Chemical Physics151, 10.1063/1.5109482 (2019)

    M. Rey, The Journal of Chemical Physics151, 10.1063/1.5109482 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5109482 2019

  52. [53]

    M. Rey, D. Viglaska, O. Egorov, and A. V. Nikitin, The Journal of Chemical Physics159, 10.1063/5.0166657 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0166657 2023

  53. [54]

    Lauvergnat and A

    D. Lauvergnat and A. Nauts, The Journal of Chemical Physics116, 8560–8570 (2002)

    work page 2002

  54. [55]

    Brommer and F

    P. Brommer and F. G¨ ahler, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering15, 295–304 (2007)

    work page 2007

  55. [56]

    P. S. Thomas, T. Carrington, J. Agarwal, and H. F. Schaefer, The Journal of Chemical Physics149, 10.1063/1.5039147 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5039147 2018

  56. [57]

    Avila and T

    G. Avila and T. Carrington, The Journal of Chemical Physics143, 10.1063/1.4936294 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4936294 2015

  57. [58]

    Carrington, Mathematics6, 13 (2018)

    T. Carrington, Mathematics6, 13 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [59]

    Dawes and T

    R. Dawes and T. Carrington, The Journal of Chemical Physics121, 726–736 (2004)

    work page 2004

  59. [60]

    Helgaker, P

    T. Helgaker, P. Jørgensen, and J. Olsen,Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory(Wiley, 2000)

    work page 2000

  60. [61]

    Behler, Chemical Reviews121, 10037–10072 (2021)

    J. Behler, Chemical Reviews121, 10037–10072 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [62]

    O. T. Unke, S. Chmiela, H. E. Sauceda, M. Gastegger, I. Poltavsky, K. T. Sch¨ utt, A. Tkatchenko, and K.-R. M¨ uller, Chemical Reviews121, 10142–10186 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [63]

    Manzhos and T

    S. Manzhos and T. Carrington, Chemical Reviews121, 10187–10217 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [64]

    K¨ aser, L

    S. K¨ aser, L. I. Vazquez-Salazar, M. Meuwly, and K. T¨ opfer, Digital Discovery2, 28–58 (2023). 62

    work page 2023

  64. [65]

    Nandi, R

    A. Nandi, R. Conte, C. Qu, P. L. Houston, Q. Yu, and J. M. Bowman, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 18, 5527–5538 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [66]

    Sibaev, I

    M. Sibaev, I. Polyak, F. R. Manby, and P. J. Knowles, The Journal of Chemical Physics153, 10.1063/5.0018930 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0018930 2020

  66. [67]

    Sasmal and O

    S. Sasmal and O. Vendrell, The Journal of Chemical Physics153, 10.1063/5.0028116 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0028116 2020

  67. [68]

    E. Saly, D. Ferenc, and E. M´ atyus, Molecular Physics121, 10.1080/00268976.2022.2163714 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1080/00268976.2022.2163714 2022

  68. [69]

    P. M. Felker, I. Simk´ o, and Z. Baˇ ci´ c, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A128, 8170–8189 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [70]

    B. P. Mant, A. Yachmenev, J. Tennyson, and S. N. Yurchenko, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society478, 3220–3232 (2018)

    work page 2018

  70. [71]

    J. M. Bowman, S. Carter, and X. Huang, International Reviews in Physical Chemistry22, 533–549 (2003)

    work page 2003

  71. [72]

    Rabitz and O

    H. Rabitz and O. F. Ali¸ s, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry25, 197–233 (1999)

    work page 1999

  72. [73]

    Christiansen, The Journal of Chemical Physics120, 2140–2148 (2004)

    O. Christiansen, The Journal of Chemical Physics120, 2140–2148 (2004)

    work page 2004

  73. [74]

    Brown and T

    J. Brown and T. Carrington, The Journal of Chemical Physics144, 10.1063/1.4954721 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4954721 2016

  74. [75]

    Halverson and B

    T. Halverson and B. Poirier, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A119, 12417–12433 (2015)

    work page 2015

  75. [76]

    Simmons and T

    J. Simmons and T. Carrington, The Journal of Chemical Physics158, 10.1063/5.0146703 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0146703 2023

  76. [77]

    Wodraszka and T

    R. Wodraszka and T. Carrington, The Journal of Chemical Physics160, 10.1063/5.0214557 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0214557 2024

  77. [78]

    Wang and M

    H. Wang and M. Thoss, J. Chem. Phys.119, 1289 (2003)

    work page 2003

  78. [79]

    Manthe, J

    U. Manthe, J. Chem. Phys.128, 164116 (2008)

    work page 2008

  79. [80]

    Vendrell and H.-D

    O. Vendrell and H.-D. Meyer, J. Chem. Phys.134, 044135 (2011)

    work page 2011

  80. [81]

    Vendrell, F

    O. Vendrell, F. Gatti, and H.-D. Meyer, The Journal of Chemical Physics131, 10.1063/1.3183166 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3183166 2009

Showing first 80 references.