pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2511.09311 · v3 · submitted 2025-11-12 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.GA

A Unified Dark-Matter--Driven Relativistic Bondi Route to Black-Hole Growth from Stellar to Supermassive Scales

Chian-Shu Chen , Feng-Li Lin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 22:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA
keywords self-interacting dark matterBondi accretionprimordial black holessupermassive black holesblack hole growthearly universedark matter particle mass
0
0 comments X

The pith

Self-interacting dark matter in a critical regime drives Bondi accretion that grows primordial black holes into supermassive ones by redshift seven, independent of local conditions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to demonstrate that self-interacting dark matter particles admit a special Bondi accretion mode onto black holes once the sound speed becomes near-relativistic. In that regime the accretion rate is fixed solely by the particle mass and loses all dependence on the surrounding density or gas profile. This universal rate is large enough, for masses at or above roughly 0.01 electronvolts, to turn a 10-solar-mass seed into a 10^9–10^10 solar-mass object within the first 700 million years. A reader cares because the mechanism supplies a concrete link between the microscopic mass of dark matter and the existence of the earliest observed supermassive black holes without invoking specially tuned astrophysical environments.

Core claim

In the critical regime of near-relativistic sound speed the relativistic Bondi accretion rate onto a black hole is determined only by the self-interacting dark matter particle mass m. For m greater than or equal to 10^{-2} eV this rate is sufficient to grow a 10 solar-mass primordial black hole seed into a 10^9 to 10^{10} solar-mass supermassive black hole by redshift 7 regardless of the ambient medium. The final black-hole mass function at late times is then fixed once the initial primordial black-hole mass distribution and the value of m are given.

What carries the argument

The critical regime of self-interacting dark matter Bondi accretion, in which the sound speed approaches the speed of light and the accretion rate therefore depends only on the particle mass m.

If this is right

  • Given any primordial black-hole mass distribution and a fixed particle mass m, the entire black-hole mass function from stellar to supermassive scales is completely determined at late times.
  • Black-hole growth proceeds without fine-tuned gas densities or adherence to Eddington limits.
  • Microscopic properties of dark matter particles become directly testable through the observed distribution of black-hole masses at high redshift.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism operates, the rapid appearance of supermassive black holes no longer demands unusually dense or specially arranged gas reservoirs.
  • Measurements of the high-redshift black-hole mass function could be inverted to place bounds on the allowed range of self-interacting dark matter particle masses.
  • Numerical simulations that adopt this mass-dependent accretion rate could be compared directly with current quasar luminosity functions to test consistency.

Load-bearing premise

A critical regime exists in which the self-interacting dark matter sound speed is near-relativistic, rendering the Bondi accretion rate independent of ambient density and environment.

What would settle it

An observation that the masses of supermassive black holes at redshift 7 still require accretion rates that vary with local gas density, or that cannot be reached for any self-interacting dark matter mass above 0.01 electronvolts, would falsify the mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.09311 by Chian-Shu Chen, Feng-Li Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Mass evolution of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Counterpart evolution of the Bondi radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Evolution of the QCD PBH mass function for Log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Observations of luminous quasars at $z\gtrsim7$ reveal supermassive black holes (SMBHs) with inferred masses $M_{\rm BH}\sim10^9 \, M_\odot$ formed within the first $\sim700$~Myr of cosmic history. Standard growth channels \textrm{ -- } Eddington-limited gas accretion and hierarchical mergers \textrm{ -- } face severe timescale restrictions. We consider a super-Eddington accretion mechanism aided by the Bondi accretion of a minimal model of self-interacting dark matter (SIDM). We demonstrate that in a {\it critical regime} with a near-relativistic sound speed, the Bondi accretion yields an accretion rate that depends only on the mass $m$ of SIDM, thus it is universal to the ambient environment. This critical accretion mechanism for $m\gtrsim 10^{-2}\; {\rm eV}$ can grow seeds as small as $10\,M_\odot$ primordial black holes (PBH) in the early Universe into $10^9$ \textrm{--} $10^{10}\,M_\odot$ SMBHs by $z\sim7$ without fine-tuned environments. Therefore, given a mass distribution of PBHs and a value of $m$, the mass function of primary black holes at late time can be fully determined with masses ranging from stellar to SMBHs. This connects the microscopic physics of dark matter to astrophysical observations of black holes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that a minimal self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) fluid enables relativistic Bondi accretion onto primordial black holes (PBHs). In a 'critical regime' with near-relativistic sound speed, the accretion rate is claimed to depend only on the SIDM particle mass m (for m ≳ 10^{-2} eV), making it universal and independent of ambient density profiles or environment. This allows 10 M_⊙ PBH seeds to grow into 10^9–10^{10} M_⊙ supermassive black holes by z ∼ 7 without fine-tuned conditions, unifying stellar to supermassive black hole growth and determining the late-time black hole mass function from the PBH distribution and m.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the result would provide a direct link between dark matter microphysics and the rapid formation of high-redshift SMBHs, offering a potential resolution to the timescale problem for z ≳ 7 quasars that avoids reliance on super-Eddington gas accretion or hierarchical mergers. It would imply that SIDM properties alone can dictate black hole demographics across scales.

major comments (2)
  1. [Critical regime and accretion rate derivation] The claim that the relativistic Bondi rate reduces to a function of m alone in the critical regime (with near-relativistic sound speed) is load-bearing for the environment-independence and the no-fine-tuning assertion. Standard form is Ṁ ∝ G² M_BH² ρ_∞ / c_s³ (or relativistic generalization); the manuscript must derive explicitly how the SIDM equation of state and self-interaction cross-section produce the required cancellation between ρ_∞ and c_s³ such that the ratio depends only on m across the range of early-Universe densities and velocity dispersions relevant for growth from 10 M_⊙ to 10^9–10^{10} M_⊙ by z ∼ 7. Without this derivation or numerical demonstration, the universality result remains unverified.
  2. [Growth from stellar to supermassive scales] The growth calculation from 10 M_⊙ seeds to 10^9–10^{10} M_⊙ by z ∼ 7 must include the integrated timescale, explicit dependence on initial PBH mass distribution, and checks against variations in ambient conditions to substantiate that the mechanism operates without fine-tuning. The abstract states the outcome but the supporting integration and sensitivity analysis are needed to make the claim quantitative.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and definitions] Define the precise boundaries of the 'critical regime' (e.g., the range of sound speed relative to c and the corresponding self-interaction strength) with a dedicated equation or table.
  2. [Introduction and references] Add references to prior relativistic Bondi accretion literature and existing SIDM constraints to contextualize the minimal model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The major comments identify key areas where additional explicit derivations and quantitative details will strengthen the presentation of the SIDM-driven relativistic Bondi accretion mechanism. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and expansions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The claim that the relativistic Bondi rate reduces to a function of m alone in the critical regime (with near-relativistic sound speed) is load-bearing for the environment-independence and the no-fine-tuning assertion. Standard form is Ṁ ∝ G² M_BH² ρ_∞ / c_s³ (or relativistic generalization); the manuscript must derive explicitly how the SIDM equation of state and self-interaction cross-section produce the required cancellation between ρ_∞ and c_s³ such that the ratio depends only on m across the range of early-Universe densities and velocity dispersions relevant for growth from 10 M_⊙ to 10^9–10^{10} M_⊙ by z ∼ 7. Without this derivation or numerical demonstration, the universality result remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit, step-by-step derivation of the cancellation is essential for verifying the claimed universality. The original manuscript introduces the critical regime in Section 3, where the SIDM fluid reaches near-relativistic sound speeds set by the particle mass m and the self-interaction cross-section per unit mass. To address the referee's concern directly, we have added a dedicated subsection that starts from the relativistic Bondi accretion formula, substitutes the SIDM equation of state (derived from the self-interacting fluid dynamics), and shows analytically how ρ_∞ / c_s³ becomes independent of ambient density and velocity dispersion, depending only on m for m ≳ 10^{-2} eV. We further include a numerical scan over a range of early-universe densities and dispersions to confirm the cancellation holds across the relevant parameter space for growth from stellar-mass to supermassive scales. These additions make the environment-independence fully transparent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The growth calculation from 10 M_⊙ seeds to 10^9–10^{10} M_⊙ by z ∼ 7 must include the integrated timescale, explicit dependence on initial PBH mass distribution, and checks against variations in ambient conditions to substantiate that the mechanism operates without fine-tuning. The abstract states the outcome but the supporting integration and sensitivity analysis are needed to make the claim quantitative.

    Authors: We concur that the growth results require more explicit quantitative support to demonstrate robustness without fine-tuning. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the growth section to present the full time-integrated accretion history from z ≈ 20 to z ≈ 7, using the universal rate derived in the critical regime. We now show results for both a monochromatic 10 M_⊙ seed population and an extended initial PBH mass function, with the final mass distribution at z ∼ 7 determined solely by the choice of m. We also add sensitivity tests that vary ambient density profiles and velocity dispersions over plausible early-universe ranges; these confirm that the final black-hole masses remain in the 10^9–10^{10} M_⊙ interval for m ≳ 0.01 eV, thereby substantiating the lack of fine-tuning. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Critical regime's claimed environment-independence of SIDM Bondi rate rests on unshown cancellation between ρ_∞ and c_s tied only to m

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "We demonstrate that in a critical regime with a near-relativistic sound speed, the Bondi accretion yields an accretion rate that depends only on the mass m of SIDM, thus it is universal to the ambient environment."

    The critical regime is defined precisely to yield an accretion rate depending only on m (via near-relativistic c_s that cancels ambient ρ_∞ dependence in the Bondi expression). Without shown equations demonstrating enforcement by SIDM self-interactions, the universality is built into the regime choice rather than derived from first principles or the particle model.

full rationale

The paper's central result—that Bondi accretion in the critical regime depends only on SIDM particle mass m and is therefore universal—relies on positing a near-relativistic sound-speed regime that enforces the necessary cancellation in the relativistic Bondi formula. No explicit derivation from the SIDM equation of state or cross-section is quoted showing how this cancellation occurs across relevant early-Universe densities; the independence is therefore introduced by the regime definition rather than independently derived from the microscopic model. This produces partial circularity in the load-bearing step without reducing the entire derivation to a fit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a minimal SIDM model plus the ad-hoc critical regime; no independent evidence or external benchmarks are supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • SIDM particle mass m
    The sole parameter on which the claimed universal accretion rate depends; threshold m ≳ 10^{-2} eV is required for the growth timeline to work.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Bondi accretion formula remains valid in the near-relativistic sound-speed regime for SIDM
    Invoked to derive the m-only dependence.
  • ad hoc to paper Existence of a critical regime with near-relativistic sound speed that erases environmental dependence
    Introduced in the abstract to achieve universality.
invented entities (1)
  • Minimal self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) fluid no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides the accretion medium whose particle mass controls black-hole growth rate
    Postulated minimal model with no independent falsifiable signature given in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5578 in / 1653 out tokens · 60524 ms · 2026-05-17T22:42:54.973993+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    An 800-million-solar-mass black hole in a significantly neutral Universe at redshift 7.5

    E. Banados et al., Nature553, 473 (2018), 1712.01860

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Yang et al., Astrophys

    J. Yang et al., Astrophys. J. Lett.897, L14 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [4]

    R. L. Larson et al., Astrophys. J. Lett.953, L29 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [5]

    Kokorev et al., Astrophys

    V. Kokorev et al., Astrophys. J. Lett.957, L7 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [6]

    Maiolino et al., Nature619, 51 (2023)

    R. Maiolino et al., Nature619, 51 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [7]

    L. J. Furtak et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.526, 3382 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [8]

    Harikane et al., The Astrophysical Journal959, 39 (2023), published December 2023, URLhttps://doi

    Y. Harikane et al., The Astrophysical Journal959, 39 (2023), published December 2023, URLhttps://doi. org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e 2023

  8. [9]

    D. e. a. Kocevski, Nature628, 57 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [10]

    O. E. Kovacs et al., Astrophys. J. Lett.965, L21 (2024), 2403.14745

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [11]

    Bogdan et al., Nature Astron.8, 126 (2024), 2305.15458

    A. Bogdan et al., Nature Astron.8, 126 (2024), 2305.15458

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [12]

    Juodžbalis et al., Nature636, 594 (2024), 2403.03872

    I. Juodžbalis et al., Nature636, 594 (2024), 2403.03872

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [13]

    D. D. Kocevski et al., The Astrophysical Journal986, 126 (2025), 2404.03576

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [14]

    A. J. Taylor et al., The Astrophysical Journal986, 165 (2025), 2409.06772

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [15]

    J. H. Wise, J. A. Regan, B. W. O’Shea, M. L. Norman, T. P. Downes, and H. Xu, Nature566, 85 (2019), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0873-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0873-4 2019

  15. [16]

    The Formation of the First Stars. I. The Primordial Star Forming Cloud

    V. Bromm, P. S. Coppi, and R. B. Larson, Astrophys. J. 564, 23 (2002), astro-ph/0102503

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  16. [17]

    S. P. Oh and Z. Haiman, Astrophys. J.569, 558 (2002), astro-ph/0108071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  17. [18]

    M. C. Begelman, M. Volonteri, and M. J. Rees, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society370, 289 (2006), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2006.10467.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966 2006

  18. [19]

    Volonteri, Astron

    M. Volonteri, Astron. Astrophys. Rev.18, 279 (2010)

    work page 2010

  19. [20]

    Inayoshi, E

    K. Inayoshi, E. Visbal, and Z. Haiman, Annu. Rev. As- tron. Astrophys.58, 27 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [21]

    A.SmithandV.Bromm, Contemp.Phys.60, 111(2019), 1904.12890

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [22]

    J. E. Greene, J. Strader, and L. C. Ho, Annu. Rev. As- tron. Astrophys.58, 257 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [23]

    L. R. Prole, J. A. Regan, S. C. O. Glover, R. S. Klessen, F. D. Priestley, and P. C. Clark, Astron. Astrophys.685, A31 (2024), 2312.06769

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [24]

    M. C. Begelman, R. D. Blandford, and M. J. Rees, Na- ture287, 307 (1980), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ 287307a0

    work page 1980

  24. [25]

    Volonteri, F

    M. Volonteri, F. Haardt, and P. Madau, The Astrophys- ical Journal582, 559 (2003)

    work page 2003

  25. [26]

    M. C. Miller and D. P. Hamilton, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society330, 232 (2002), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711. 2002.05050.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711 2002

  26. [27]

    C. L. Rodriguez, M. Zevin, P. Amaro-Seoane, S. Chatter- jee, K. Kremer, F. A. Rasio, and C. S. Ye, Phys. Rev. D 100, 043027 (2019), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.043027 2019

  27. [28]

    Gerosa and M

    D. Gerosa and M. Fishbach, Nature Astronomy 5, 749 (2021), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41550-021-01398-w

    work page 2021

  28. [29]

    H.-H. S. Chiu, H.-Y. Schive, H.-Y. K. Yang, H. Huang, and M. Gaspari, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 051402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [30]

    D. N. Spergel and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3760 (2000)

    work page 2000

  30. [31]

    Tulin and H.-B

    S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rept.730, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [32]

    Clowe, M

    D. Clowe, M. Bradač, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones, and D. Zaritsky, The Astro- physical Journal Letters648, L109 (2006)

    work page 2006

  32. [33]

    Bradač, The Astrophysical Journal679, 1173 (2008)

    S.W.Randall, M.Markevitch, D.Clowe, A.H.Gonzalez, and M. Bradač, The Astrophysical Journal679, 1173 (2008)

    work page 2008

  33. [34]

    Feng, H.-B

    W.-X. Feng, H.-B. Yu, and Y.-M. Zhong, arXiv e-prints (2025), 2506.17641

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [35]

    Colpi, S

    M. Colpi, S. L. Shapiro, and I. Wasserman, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 2485 (1986)

    work page 1986

  35. [36]

    Zhang, L.-W

    K. Zhang, L.-W. Luo, J.-S. Tsao, C.-S. Chen, and F.-L. Lin, Results Phys.53, 106967 (2023), 2303.03266

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [37]

    S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky,Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: The physics of compact ob- jects(1983), ISBN 978-0-471-87316-7, 978-3-527-61766- 1

    work page 1983

  37. [38]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), 1807.06209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  38. [39]

    G. L. Bryan and M. L. Norman, Astrophysical Journal 495, 80 (1998)

    work page 1998

  39. [40]

    S. D. M. White and M. J. Rees, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society183, 341 (1978)

    work page 1978

  40. [41]

    G. R. Blumenthal, S. M. Faber, J. R. Primack, and M. J. Rees, Nature311, 517 (1984)

    work page 1984

  41. [42]

    Schaye et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society446, 521 (2015), URLhttps://doi.org/10

    J. Schaye et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society446, 521 (2015), URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1093/mnras/stu2058

    work page 2015

  42. [43]

    Balberg, S

    S. Balberg, S. L. Shapiro, and S. Inagaki, Astrophys. J. 568, 475 (2002)

    work page 2002

  43. [44]

    Kaplinghat, S

    M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin, and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 041302 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [45]

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.168, 399 (1974)

    work page 1974

  45. [46]

    Jedamzik, Phys

    K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. D55, R5871 (1997)

    work page 1997

  46. [47]

    C. T. Byrnes, M. Hindmarsh, S. Young, and M. R. S. Hawkins, JCAP2018, 041 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [48]

    Effect of Primordial Black Holes on the Cosmic Microwave Background and Cosmological Parameter Estimates

    M. Ricotti, J. P. Ostriker, and K. J. Mack, Astrophys. J. 680, 829 (2008), 0709.0524

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [49]

    Ali-Haïmoud and M

    Y. Ali-Haïmoud and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. D 95, 043534 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [50]

    CMB bounds on disk-accreting massive Primordial Black Holes

    V. Poulin, P. D. Serpico, F. Calore, S. Clesse, and K. Kohri, Phys. Rev. D96, 083524 (2017), 1707.04206

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [51]

    P. D. Serpico, V. Poulin, D. Inman, and K. Kohri, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023204 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [52]

    Astrophys.469, 387 (2007)

    P.Tisserandandothers(EROS-2Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys.469, 387 (2007)

    work page 2007

  52. [53]

    Niikura, M

    H. Niikura, M. Takada, N. Yasuda, R. H. Lupton, T. Sumi, S. More, T. Kurita, S. Sugiyama, A. More, M. Oguri, et al., Nature Astron.3, 524 (2019)

    work page 2019

  53. [54]

    Carr and F

    B. Carr and F. Kühnel, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 355 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [55]

    Bondi, Mon

    H. Bondi, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.112, 195 (1952)

    work page 1952

  55. [56]

    Hoyle and R

    F. Hoyle and R. A. Lyttleton, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 101, 227 (1941)

    work page 1941

  56. [57]

    G. R. Blumenthal, S. M. Faber, R. Flores, and J. R. Primack, Astrophysical Journal301, 27 (1986), URL https://doi.org/10.1086/163867

    work page doi:10.1086/163867 1986

  57. [58]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, As- trophysical Journal462, 563 (1996), URLhttps://doi. 7 org/10.1086/177173

    work page doi:10.1086/177173 1996

  58. [59]

    H. J. Mo, F. C. van den Bosch, and S. D. M. White, Galaxy Formation and Evolution(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)

    work page 2010

  59. [60]

    W.-X. Feng, A. Parisi, C.-S. Chen, and F.-L. Lin, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics p. 032 (2022), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2022/08/032

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2022

  60. [61]

    Zavala, M

    J. Zavala, M. Vogelsberger, and M. G. Walker, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett.431, L20 (2013)

    work page 2013

  61. [62]

    L. G. van den Aarssen, T. Bringmann, and C. Pfrommer, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 231301 (2012), 1205.5809

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  62. [63]

    Resonant Dark Forces and Small Scale Structure

    S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 111301 (2013), 1210.0900

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  63. [64]

    J. Eby, C. Kouvaris, N. G. Nielsen, and L. C. R. Wijew- ardhana, JHEP02, 028 (2016), 1511.04474

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [65]

    Maselli, P

    A. Maselli, P. Pnigouras, N. G. Nielsen, C. Kou- varis, and K. D. Kokkotas, Phys. Rev. D96, 023005 (2017), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevD.96.023005. 1 Supplementary Material forA Unified Dark-Matter–Driven Relativistic Bondi Route to Black-Hole Growth from Stellar to Supermassive Scales In this supplementary material, we will first discuss ...

    work page 2017

  65. [66]

    The Eddington accretion is due to the balance between the radiation pressure and gravity, and the heat due to the collision can be depleted by the radiation to prevent the heating-up feedback

    work page

  66. [67]

    Unlike the Eddington accretion rate with a universaltEdd, the Bondi one depends on energy densityρof the accreting fluid, which is usually insufficient to supply enough inflow of matter to form SMBHs. For examples, for a black hole ofM= 3M ⊙ yielding ˙MEdd ∼6×10 −8M⊙/yr, then (i) in the post-ionization intergalactic medium withn∼10 −6cm−3,a∼12km/s, ˙MBond...

    work page

  67. [68]

    This leads to a suppressed accretion rate compared to Bondi’s prediction

    Moreover, considering the accretion of cold dark matter (CDM), the local density of CDM in the inner region is estimated to be far smaller than the baryonic matter in the halos with NFW structures [42, 57–59]. This leads to a suppressed accretion rate compared to Bondi’s prediction

    work page

  68. [69]

    This can also be understood as resistance to collapse under high pressure, leading to slower accretion

    On the other hand, considering the accretion of relativistic dark matter, the Bondi accretion rate is suppressed by largec s ∼ O(c). This can also be understood as resistance to collapse under high pressure, leading to slower accretion. 2 Therefore, in the usual consideration of forming SMBH by accretion mechanism, the Eddington is usually the dominant me...

    work page

  69. [70]

    The fact of zero sound speed,a= 0, implies no pressure support, thus no Bondi flow. Thus, thea→0is a critical limit, so that the Bondi accretion should be replaced by ballistic free fall of dust with the accretion rate ˙Mdust = 4πr2 capρ∞v∞ = 16πρ∞ (GM)2 v3∞ (S5) wherer cap = 2GM v2∞ is the gravitational capture radius, andv∞ is the asymptotic ballistic v...

    work page

  70. [71]

    The vanishing aimplies the CDM is almost collisionless, so that its capture by the central black hole simply relies on gravity

    Physically, the above failure of Bondi accretion in the critical limit can be understood as follows. The vanishing aimplies the CDM is almost collisionless, so that its capture by the central black hole simply relies on gravity. This needs a small impact parameter, resulting in a smaller effective accretion rate than predicted by Bondi accretion

    work page

  71. [72]

    Thus, it lacks a mechanism to realize huge

    The tiny scattering cross-section of CDM also limits the increase of coarse-grained phase-space density to form ”Bondi radius". Thus, it lacks a mechanism to realize huge "Bondi focusing" even with a tiny sound speed. We now move the consider how to bypass the no-go of forming SMBH by Bondi accretion. From the above discussions, we cannot consider CDM, bu...

    work page

  72. [73]

    The prefactor of the Bondi accretion rate diverges asa→c/3

    work page

  73. [74]

    This ensures a dense profile to supply Bondi accretion

    The Bondi accretion creates a spike profile around the center black hole as shown in [60]. This ensures a dense profile to supply Bondi accretion

    work page

  74. [75]

    This SIDM model can also resolve other astrophysical issues, such as the satellite problem, bullet cluster collision, and the too-big-to-fall problem, and satisfy the cosmological constraint by appropriately tuning the model parameters, e.g., see [30, 31, 33, 61–63]

    work page

  75. [76]

    The Bondi accretion rate should be self-regulated to avoid the over-production of SMBHs in the current era, which we do not observe

    work page

  76. [77]

    The total mass of the halos can also be estimated by treating the primordial halos as the Tolman-Oppenheimer- Volkoff (TOV) configurations. The key message from the above discussions is as follows: By assuming that SMBHs form through Bondi accretion of DM, the recently discovered SMBHs by JWST can place a very tight constraint on DM models. Once a viable ...

    work page