pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.10789 · v1 · submitted 2025-11-13 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.chem-ph· physics.comp-ph

Correlated Purification for Restoring N-Representability in Quantum Simulation

Yuchen Wang , Irma Avdic , Michael Rose , Lillian I. Payne Torres , Anna O. Schouten , Kevin J. Sung , David A. Mazziotti This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 21:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords quantum simulationshadow tomographyN-representabilityreduced density matrixpurificationsemidefinite programmingfermionic systemsquantum chemistry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Correlated purification restores N-representability to noisy two-electron RDMs via bi-objective semidefinite programming.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a correlated purification framework that corrects unphysical two-electron reduced density matrices arising from statistical and hardware noise in classical shadow tomography. It employs semidefinite programming to perform a bi-objective optimization that simultaneously minimizes the many-electron energy and the nuclear norm of the correction applied to the measured 2-RDM. The nuclear-norm term encourages low-rank, physically meaningful adjustments while the energy term guides the solution toward purer ground states. In tests on fermionic shadow tomography of large hydrogen chains, the method produces large drops in both energy error and 2-RDM deviation, reaching chemical accuracy across dissociation curves. The framework remains usable for excited or non-stationary states by lowering the relative weight on the energy objective.

Core claim

The correlated purification framework based on semidefinite programming restores accuracy to noisy, unphysical two-electron RDMs by performing a bi-objective optimization that minimizes both the many-electron energy and the nuclear norm of the change in the measured 2-RDM, yielding substantial reductions in energy and 2-RDM error and achieving chemical accuracy in applications to large hydrogen chains.

What carries the argument

Bi-objective semidefinite-programming optimization that minimizes the many-electron energy together with the nuclear norm of the correction to the measured 2-RDM, thereby promoting low-rank physically valid adjustments.

If this is right

  • Substantial reductions occur in both energy and 2-RDM error for fermionic shadow tomography of large hydrogen chains.
  • Chemical accuracy is reached across the full dissociation curve of the studied systems.
  • The same procedure applies to excited and non-stationary states simply by decreasing the energy weight relative to the error norm.
  • The approach supplies a robust post-processing strategy for any many-body quantum simulation that produces noisy 2-RDM estimates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method may be combined with hardware-specific error-mitigation techniques to improve performance on actual quantum processors.
  • Testing the same purification pipeline on molecules other than hydrogen chains would reveal how broadly the nuclear-norm regularizer succeeds.
  • Varying the relative weight between energy and nuclear-norm terms could be optimized per observable to minimize error on properties beyond the ground-state energy.

Load-bearing premise

The bi-objective optimization with tunable energy weight and nuclear-norm regularization can recover physically valid 2-RDMs from realistic noise levels without introducing artifacts that invalidate the energy or other observables.

What would settle it

Applying the procedure to shadow-tomography data from a hydrogen chain and finding that the output energy lies outside chemical accuracy or that the purified 2-RDM violates a basic N-representability condition such as positive semidefiniteness would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.10789 by Anna O. Schouten, David A. Mazziotti, Irma Avdic, Kevin J. Sung, Lillian I. Payne Torres, Michael Rose, Yuchen Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Both (a) absolute energy error and (b) 2-RDM de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Energy of the 7th excited state of H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of error metrics for hydrogen chains H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dissociation curve and energy error for the H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Lowest eigenvalues of the two-electron reduced den [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Classical shadow tomography offers a scalable route to estimating properties of quantum states, but the resulting reduced density matrices (RDMs) often violate constraints that ensure they represent $N$-electron states -- known as $N$-representability conditions -- because of statistical and hardware noise. We present a correlated purification framework based on semidefinite programming to restore accuracy to these noisy, unphysical two-electron RDMs. The method performs a bi-objective optimization that minimizes both the many-electron energy and the nuclear norm of the change in the measured 2-RDM. The nuclear norm, often employed in matrix completion, promotes low-rank, physically meaningful corrections to the 2-RDM, while the energy term acts as a regularization term that can improve the purity of the ground state. While the method is particularly effective for the ground state, it can also be applied to excited and non-stationary states by decreasing the weight of the energy relative to the error norm. In an application to fermionic shadow tomography of large hydrogen chains, correlated purification yields substantial reductions in both energy and 2-RDM error, achieving chemical accuracy across dissociation curves. This framework provides a robust strategy for tomography in many-body quantum simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a correlated purification framework using semidefinite programming to restore N-representability to noisy 2-RDMs from fermionic shadow tomography. It solves a bi-objective optimization minimizing the many-electron energy computed from the corrected 2-RDM plus a nuclear-norm penalty on the correction matrix Delta. The method is applied to hydrogen-chain simulations, claiming substantial reductions in energy and 2-RDM errors that achieve chemical accuracy across dissociation curves, with the energy term acting as regularization that is particularly effective for ground states.

Significance. If the central claims hold without bias, the framework could provide a practical post-processing tool for improving accuracy in shadow tomography for quantum many-body simulations, leveraging standard SDP and nuclear-norm techniques to enforce physical constraints on noisy data. The approach extends matrix-completion ideas to fermionic systems and offers a tunable method for ground versus excited states.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and optimization formulation] Abstract and optimization formulation: the bi-objective SDP minimizes the energy (computed from the corrected 2-RDM using the Hamiltonian) plus lambda * nuclear_norm(Delta). This explicitly incorporates the Hamiltonian as a prior during purification rather than enforcing N-representability constraints alone. For the central claim of chemical accuracy on hydrogen chains, the reported energy-error reductions could arise from variational pulling toward lower energies instead of faithful recovery from noise; the nuclear-norm term alone does not guarantee unbiased observables when the energy weight is nonzero.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results on hydrogen chains] Results on hydrogen chains: the performance gains are stated without error bars, details on the number of shadow tomography shots, or explicit baseline comparisons to standard N-representability projections that omit the energy term.
  2. [Method and parameter selection] Parameter selection: the relative weight between the energy term and nuclear-norm error is described as tunable but no systematic procedure or sensitivity analysis for its choice is provided.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment regarding the optimization formulation below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and optimization formulation] Abstract and optimization formulation: the bi-objective SDP minimizes the energy (computed from the corrected 2-RDM using the Hamiltonian) plus lambda * nuclear_norm(Delta). This explicitly incorporates the Hamiltonian as a prior during purification rather than enforcing N-representability constraints alone. For the central claim of chemical accuracy on hydrogen chains, the reported energy-error reductions could arise from variational pulling toward lower energies instead of faithful recovery from noise; the nuclear-norm term alone does not guarantee unbiased observables when the energy weight is nonzero.

    Authors: We agree that the objective explicitly includes the many-electron energy, which incorporates information from the Hamiltonian. However, the semidefinite program enforces N-representability conditions as hard constraints on the corrected 2-RDM, so that the output is guaranteed to correspond to a valid N-electron state. The energy term functions as a regularization that selects, among the feasible N-representable matrices, the one closest to the ground state, while the nuclear-norm penalty on Delta ensures the correction remains minimal and low-rank. This combination is intentional for ground-state applications, as stated in the manuscript, and the weight on the energy term can be reduced or set to zero for excited or non-stationary states. To address the concern of bias, we note that the reported improvements include direct reductions in 2-RDM error metrics (independent of the Hamiltonian), which are not part of the objective and therefore provide evidence of improved fidelity beyond variational energy lowering. We will add a clarifying paragraph in the Methods section and an ablation with zero energy weight to make this distinction explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; method is a standard SDP construction with independent numerical validation

full rationale

The paper presents a bi-objective SDP that enforces N-representability constraints while using nuclear-norm regularization on the correction and an energy term as tunable regularization. The reported error reductions on hydrogen-chain shadow tomography are numerical outcomes of applying this procedure to noisy input 2-RDMs; they are not obtained by renaming or re-fitting quantities already defined in the input data or by a self-citation chain that supplies the central result. The framework remains self-contained against external benchmarks because the N-representability conditions and nuclear-norm objective are drawn from established convex optimization literature rather than from quantities defined inside the present work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that nuclear-norm regularization yields physically meaningful low-rank corrections and that the energy term acts as a useful regularizer; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • relative weight of energy term versus nuclear-norm error
    The abstract states that the weight is decreased for excited or non-stationary states, indicating a tunable hyperparameter chosen to balance the two objectives.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Nuclear norm promotes low-rank, physically meaningful corrections to the 2-RDM
    Invoked when describing the bi-objective optimization; this is a standard matrix-completion heuristic applied here to quantum RDMs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5540 in / 1272 out tokens · 32702 ms · 2026-05-17T21:53:44.892987+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Lanyon, J. D. Whitfield, G. G. Gillett, M. E. Goggin, M. P. Almeida, I. Kassal, J. D. Biamonte, M. Mohseni, B. J. Powell, M. Barbieri,et al., Towards quantum chemistry on a quantum computer, Nat. Chem. 2, 106 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum sim- ulation, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 153 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    McArdle, S

    S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, Quantum computational chemistry, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 015003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano,et al., Programmable quantum sim- ulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Singh, R

    V. Singh, R. Gupta, M. Sajjan, F. Remacle, R. D. Levine, and S. Kais, Maximal entropy formalism and the re- stricted boltzmann machine, J. Phys. Chem. A.129, 5405–5414 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    A. J. Coleman and V. I. Yukalov,Reduced Density Ma- trices: Coulson ’s Challenge(Springer, Berlin, 2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    D. A. Mazziotti,Reduced-Density-Matrix Mechan- ics: With Application to Many-Electron Atoms and Molecules, Advances in Chemical Physics (Wiley, 2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Aaronson, Shadow tomography of quantum states, in Proceedings of the 50th annual ACM SIGACT sympo- sium on theory of computing(2018) pp

    S. Aaronson, Shadow tomography of quantum states, in Proceedings of the 50th annual ACM SIGACT sympo- sium on theory of computing(2018) pp. 325–338

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Huang, R

    H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, and J. Preskill, Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measure- ments, Nature Physics16, 1050 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    A. Zhao, N. C. Rubin, and A. Miyake, Fermionic par- tial tomography via classical shadows, Physical Review Letters127, 110504 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    G. H. Low, Classical shadows of fermions with parti- cle number symmetry, arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.08964 10.48550/arXiv.2208.08964 (2022)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.08964 2022

  12. [12]

    A. J. Coleman, Structure of fermion density matrices, Rev. Mod. Phys.35, 668 (1963)

    work page 1963

  13. [13]

    R. M. Erdahl, Representability, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 13, 697 (1978)

    work page 1978

  14. [14]

    J. E. Harriman, Geometry of density matrices. ii. reduced density matrices andNrepresentability, Phys. Rev. A 17, 1257 (1978)

    work page 1978

  15. [15]

    D. A. Mazziotti, Structure of fermionic density matrices: CompleteN-representability conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 263002 (2012)

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    D. A. Mazziotti, Quantum Many-Body Theory from a Solution of theN-Representability Problem, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 153001 (2023), 2304.08570

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    McWeeny, Some recent advances in density matrix theory, Reviews of Modern Physics32, 335 (1960)

    R. McWeeny, Some recent advances in density matrix theory, Reviews of Modern Physics32, 335 (1960)

    work page 1960

  18. [18]

    Goedecker, Linear scaling electronic structure meth- ods, Rev

    S. Goedecker, Linear scaling electronic structure meth- ods, Rev. Mod. Phys.71, 1085 (1999)

    work page 1999

  19. [19]

    D. A. Mazziotti, Purification of correlated reduced den- sity matrices, Phys. Rev. E65, 026704 (2002)

    work page 2002

  20. [20]

    Pescoller, M

    E. Pescoller, M. Eder, and I. Bˇ rezinov´ a, Projective pu- rification of correlated reduced density matrices, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 013211 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Candes and B

    E. Candes and B. Recht, Exact matrix completion via convex optimization, Communications of the ACM55, 111 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    J.-F. Cai, E. J. Cands, and Z. Shen, A Singular Value Thresholding Algorithm for Matrix Completion, SIAM J. Optim.20, 1956 (2010)

    work page 1956

  23. [23]

    S. E. Smart, J.-N. Boyn, and D. A. Mazziotti, Resolving correlated states of benzyne with an error-mitigated con- 7 tracted quantum eigensolver, Phys. Rev. A105, 022405 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    N. C. Rubin, R. Babbush, and J. McClean, Application of fermionic marginal constraints to hybrid quantum al- gorithms, New J. Phys.20, 053020 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    D. A. Mazziotti and R. M. Erdahl, Uncertainty rela- tions and reduced density matrices: Mapping many-body quantum mechanics onto four particles, Phys. Rev. A63, 042113 (2001)

    work page 2001

  26. [26]

    Nakata, H

    M. Nakata, H. Nakatsuji, M. Ehara, M. Fukuda, K. Nakata, and K. Fujisawa, Variational calculations of fermion second-order reduced density matrices by semidefinite programming algorithm, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 8282 (2001)

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    D. A. Mazziotti, Variational minimization of atomic and molecular ground-state energies via the two-particle re- duced density matrix, Phys. Rev. A65, 062511 (2002)

    work page 2002

  28. [28]

    D. A. Mazziotti, Realization of Quantum Chemistry without Wave Functions through First-Order Semidefi- nite Programming, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 213001 (2004)

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    Z. Zhao, B. J. Braams, M. Fukuda, M. L. Overton, and J. K. Percus, The reduced density matrix method for electronic structure calculations and the role of three- index representability conditions, J. Chem. Phys.120, 2095 (2004)

    work page 2095

  30. [30]

    The Electronic Ground State Energy Problem: a New Reduced Density Matrix Approach

    E. Canc` es, G. Stoltz, and M. Lewin, The electronic ground-state energy problem: A new reduced density matrix approach, J. Chem. Phys.125, 064101 (2006), quant-ph/0602042

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  31. [31]

    Gidofalvi and D

    G. Gidofalvi and D. A. Mazziotti, Active-space two- electron reduced-density-matrix method: Complete active-space calculations without diagonalization of the N-electron Hamiltonian, J. Chem. Phys.129, 134108 (2008)

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    Shenvi and A

    N. Shenvi and A. F. Izmaylov, Active-SpaceN- representability Constraints for Variational Two-Particle Reduced Density Matrix Calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 213003 (2010)

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    Variational two-particle density matrix calculation for the Hubbard model below half filling using spin-adapted lifting conditions

    B. Verstichel, H. v. Aggelen, W. Poelmans, and D. V. Neck, Variational Two-Particle Density Matrix Calcula- tion for the Hubbard Model Below Half Filling Using Spin-Adapted Lifting Conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 213001 (2011), 1110.5732

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  34. [34]

    Lower Bounds for Ground States of Condensed Matter Systems

    T. Baumgratz and M. B. Plenio, Lower bounds for ground states of condensed matter systems, New J. Phys. 14, 023027 (2012), 1106.5275

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    D. A. Mazziotti, Enhanced Constraints for Accurate Lower Bounds on Many-Electron Quantum Energies from Variational Two-Electron Reduced Density Matrix Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 153001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    D. R. Alcoba, A. Torre, L. Lain, G. E. Massaccesi, O. B. O˜ na, E. M. Honor´ e, W. Poelmans, D. V. Neck, P. Bult- inck, and S. D. Baerdemacker, Direct variational de- termination of the two-electron reduced density matrix for doubly occupied-configuration-interaction wave func- tions: The influence of three-indexN-representability conditions, J. Chem. Phy...

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    D. A. Mazziotti, Dual-cone variational calculation of the two-electron reduced density matrix, Phys. Rev. A102, 052819 (2020), 2103.17155

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    R. R. Li, M. D. Liebenthal, and A. E. DePrince, Chal- lenges for variational reduced-density-matrix theory with three-particleN-representability conditions, J. Chem. Phys.155, 174110 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    M. J. Knight, H. M. Quiney, and A. M. Martin, Reduced density matrix approach to ultracold few-fermion sys- tems in one dimension, New J. Phys.24, 053004 (2022), 2106.09187

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Q. Gao, R. A. Lanzetta, P. Ledwith, J. Wang, and E. Khalaf, Bootstrapping the Quantum Hall Problem, Phys. Rev. X15, 031034 (2025), 2409.10619

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    A. O. Schouten, S. Ewing, and D. A. Mazziotti, Boot- strapping the Electronic Structure of Quantum Materi- als, arXiv 10.48550/arxiv.2504.02861 (2025), 2504.02861

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.02861 2025

  42. [42]

    Piris, Global Natural Orbital Functional: Towards the Complete Description of the Electron Correlation, Phys

    M. Piris, Global Natural Orbital Functional: Towards the Complete Description of the Electron Correlation, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 233001 (2021), 2112.02119

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Y. Wang, I. Avdic, and D. A. Mazziotti, Shadow ansatz for the many-fermion wave function in scalable molecular simulations on quantum computing devices, Phys. Rev. A112, 022432 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Bharti, A

    K. Bharti, A. Cervera-Lierta, T. H. Kyaw, T. Haug, S. Alperin-Lea, A. Anand, M. Degroote, H. Heimonen, J. S. Kottmann, T. Menke, W.-K. Mok, S. Sim, L.-C. Kwek, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 015004 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Head-Marsden, J

    K. Head-Marsden, J. Flick, C. J. Ciccarino, and P. Narang, Quantum Information and Algorithms for Correlated Quantum Matter, Chem. Rev.121, 3061 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Peruzzo, J

    A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. J. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. L. O’Brien, A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor, Nature Commun.5, 4213 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Y. Cao, A. Papageorgiou, I. Petras, J. Traub, and S. Kais, Quantum algorithm and circuit design solving the Pois- son equation, New Journal of Physics15, 013021 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    D. A. Mazziotti, Variational reduced-density-matrix method using three-particleN-representability condi- tions with application to many-electron molecules, Phys. Rev. A74, 032501 (2006)

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    Garrod and J

    C. Garrod and J. K. Percus, Reduction of theN-Particle Variational Problem, J. Math, Phys.5, 1756 (1964)

    work page 1964

  50. [50]

    Vandenberghe and S

    L. Vandenberghe and S. Boyd, Semidefinite program- ming, SIAM Rev.38, 49 (1996)

    work page 1996

  51. [51]

    J. J. Foley IV and D. A. Mazziotti, Measurement-driven reconstruction of many-particle quantum processes by semidefinite programming with application to photosyn- thetic light harvesting, Phys. Rev. A86, 012512 (2012)

    work page 2012

  52. [52]

    Avdic and D

    I. Avdic and D. A. Mazziotti, Fewer Measurements from Shadow Tomography withN-Representability Condi- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 220802 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Liebert, F

    J. Liebert, F. Castillo, J.-P. Labb´ e, and C. Schilling, Foundation of one-particle reduced density matrix func- tional theory for excited states, J Theor Comput Chem. 18, 124 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    C. L. Benavides-Riveros, L. Chen, C. Schilling, S. Man- tilla, and S. Pittalis, Excitations of Quantum Many-Body Systems via Purified Ensembles: A Unitary-Coupled- Cluster-Based Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 066401 (2022), 2201.10974

    work page arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Wang and D

    Y. Wang and D. A. Mazziotti, Electronic excited states from a variance-based contracted quantum eigensolver, Phys. Rev. A108, 022814 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Recht, M

    B. Recht, M. Fazel, and P. A. Parrilo, Guaranteed minimum-rank solutions of linear matrix equations via nuclear norm minimization, SIAM review52, 471 (2010)

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    Q. Sun, T. C. Berkelbach, N. S. Blunt, G. H. Booth, 8 S. Guo, Z. Li, J. Liu, J. D. McClain, E. R. Sayfutyarova, S. Sharma, S. Wouters, and G. K. Chan, PySCF: the Python-based simulations of chemistry framework, Wi- ley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science8, 10.1002/wcms.1340 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1340 2018

  58. [58]

    The ffsim developers, ffsim: Faster simulations of fermionic quantum circuits,https://github.com/ qiskit-community/ffsim

    work page

  59. [59]

    Qiskit contributors, Qiskit: An open-source framework for quantum computing (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    D. A. Mazziotti, Large-Scale Semidefinite Programming for Many-Electron Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 083001 (2011). [61]Maple(Maplesoft, Waterloo, 2025). [62]Quantum Chemistry Toolbox in Maple(Maplesoft, Wa- terloo, 2025)

    work page 2011

  61. [61]

    W. J. Hehre, R. F. Stewart, and J. A. Pople, Self- consistent molecular-orbital methods. i. use of gaussian expansions of slater-type atomic orbitals, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 2657 (1969)

    work page 1969

  62. [62]

    Both numerical data and a sample computational script are openly available athttps://github.com/damazz/ CorrelatedPurification

    work page

  63. [63]

    Jordan and E

    P. Jordan and E. Wigner, ¨Uber das Paulische ¨Aquivalenzverbot, Z. Physik47, 631 (1928)

    work page 1928

  64. [64]

    Motta, K

    M. Motta, K. J. Sung, K. B. Whaley, M. Head-Gordon, and J. Shee, Bridging physical intuition and hardware ef- ficiency for correlated electronic states: the local unitary cluster jastrow ansatz for electronic structure, Chem. Sci. 14, 11213 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    D. A. Mazziotti, Variational method for solving the con- tracted Schr¨ odinger equation through a projection of the N-particle power method onto the two-particle space, J. Chem. Phys.116, 1239 (2002)

    work page 2002

  66. [66]

    Propagating two-particle reduced density matrices without wavefunctions

    F. Lackner, I. Bˇ rezinov´ a, T. Sato, K. L. Ishikawa, and J. Burgd¨ orfer, Propagating two-particle reduced den- sity matrices without wave functions, Phys. Rev. A91, 023412 (2015), 1411.0495

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015