Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

A new family of regular black holes replaces the central singularity with an anti-de Sitter core while keeping a string-cloud exterior, and ties the entropy to the regularization scale alone.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 22:14 UTC pith:IOUDCPS7

load-bearing objection A competent, internally consistent regular black hole construction with a clean entropy result, but the 'string cloud source' claim is an interpretation rather than a derivation from the string action. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2511.11419 v3 pith:IOUDCPS7 submitted 2025-11-14 gr-qc

Regularized Black Hole Solution from a New String Cloud Source

C. R. Muniz , Jonathan Alves Rebou\c{c}as , Leonardo Tavares de Oliveira , Francisco Tiago Barboza Sampaio , Francisco Bento Lustosa This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C1583C75 PACS 04.70.-s04.20.Jb
keywords regular black holesstring cloudsingularity regularizationanti-de Sitter coreblack hole thermodynamicsnon-extensive entropyblack hole shadowenergy conditions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a regular black hole spacetime whose matter source is a generalized string cloud. Its central claim is that a rational 'smearing' factor controlled by a scale r0 removes the central curvature singularity: the core becomes an anti-de Sitter vacuum, the exterior retains the string-cloud form, and all curvature invariants stay finite. From this geometry the paper derives the energy conditions, the parameter region where horizons exist, and the full thermodynamics, finding that the entropy depends only on r0 while temperature and heat capacity also feel the string parameter. A non-extensive entropy deformation eliminates the usual phase transition and leaves a single stable black hole state, and the computed shadow radius stays within current observational bounds. If the solution is physical, it offers a singularity-free string-based black hole with distinctive thermodynamic and shadow signatures.

Core claim

The central discovery is a metric function in which a rational factor of the form (1+(r0/r)^c)^(-(c+1)β/c), with c=1 and β=2, multiplies the whole string-cloud bracket. Near r=0 the metric behaves as 1+|a|r²/r0², an anti-de Sitter vacuum, and the Kretschmann scalar approaches 24|a|²/r0⁴, so the central singularity is removed. At large radius the geometry reduces to the string-cloud form with a shifted mass. The paper shows that exponential regulators leave residual divergences for this source, while this rational factor is the minimal choice that keeps all curvature invariants finite.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the rational regulator factor (1+(r0/r)^c)^(-(c+1)β/c), chosen with c=1 and β=2, multiplied into the whole string-cloud bracket. It smooths the energy density over a finite radius r0, converting the would-be singular core into an anti-de Sitter vacuum and making curvature invariants finite. The paper argues that exponential regulators leave residual linear divergences for this source, so the rational factor is the minimal choice that works; this factor alone carries the regularization, and all thermodynamic and shadow results follow from it.

Load-bearing premise

The rational regulator is assumed to describe the physical string-cloud source, but the paper does not derive it from the string action or show it is forced; if the regulator is only a mathematical device, the geometry is an ad hoc regular metric rather than a string-cloud solution.

What would settle it

Derive the stress tensor directly from the string-cloud action with a smeared string density and compare it with the density and pressure obtained from Eq. (11); a mismatch would show that the regularized metric is not actually sourced by the string cloud. Observationally, a shadow measurement that rules out the predicted smaller radius at fixed r0 would also falsify the model's parameter space.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The spacetime has no central singularity: curvature invariants are finite everywhere, with an anti-de Sitter interior and a string-cloud exterior.
  • The black hole entropy, with logarithmic and inverse-radius corrections to the area law, depends only on the regularization scale r0, not on the string parameter.
  • For standard thermodynamics the heat capacity changes sign at a critical horizon radius, signaling a second-order phase transition; with a non-extensive entropy deformation this transition disappears and a single stable branch remains.
  • The shadow radius is smaller than the Schwarzschild value and, for realistic parameters, lies within the ranges reported for the two supermassive black holes observed by current horizon-scale imaging.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not derive the rational regulator from the string action; a natural next step is to check whether a smeared string cloud can generate exactly this stress tensor, which would elevate the solution from an ad hoc metric to a derived one.
  • Because the entropy depends only on r0, measuring the late-time evaporation or remnant temperature of such a black hole could isolate the regularization scale independently of the string coupling.
  • The anti-de Sitter core curvature radius l=r0/√|a| invites a holographic reading: if the string parameters are fixed by fundamental theory, the core radius becomes a prediction that shadow observations can test.
  • Comparing this shadow curve with those of other regular black holes (exponential regulators, nonlinear-electrodynamics cores) would discriminate models using the same Sgr A* and M87* data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a static, spherically symmetric regular black hole metric by taking the Letelier-Alencar string-cloud potential and multiplying the whole bracket by a rational Dagum regulator [1+(r0/r)^c]^{-(c+1)β/c}, with c=1, β=2. It shows that an exponential Dymnikova-type regulator leaves a linear term in f(r) and hence a divergent Kretschmann scalar, while the rational regulator gives f(r)≈1+|a|r^2/r0^2 near r=0 and finite K=24|a|^2/r0^4. From Einstein equations the authors reconstruct ρ, p_r, p_t, analyze pointwise energy conditions, determine the horizon-parameter space, compute mass/horizon relation, Hawking temperature, entropy by integrating the first law, heat capacity, Rényi-thermodynamic quantities, topological charge, and shadow radius with EHT constraints. The paper's central claim is that these are regular black holes sourced by the new Letelier-Alencar string cloud.

Significance. If the physical-source identification were established, the paper would contribute a new exactly regular string-cloud black hole family: curvature regularity is verified explicitly, the near-core AdS behavior and asymptotic Letelier behavior are clean, and the temperature-entropy pair satisfies the first law through a nontrivial hypergeometric identity. The entropy formula (35), being independent of a in its explicit form, is a striking and checkable prediction. The paper is readable and analytic; the main gap is whether the reconstructed matter is actually a string cloud. Strengths include explicit metric ansatz, exact regularity check, first-law consistency, and falsifiable shadow predictions compared with EHT bounds.

major comments (2)
  1. [III, Eqs. (11), (20), (26)-(27)] The central source identification is not established. The metric (11) is obtained by inserting the Dagum factor into the Letelier-Alencar potential; the stress tensor is then reconstructed from Einstein's equations and has the anisotropic-fluid form ρ=-p_r with p_t≠0 (Eqs. (26)-(27)). No argument shows that this T_μν can be written as the Nambu-Goto string-cloud stress tensor (3) with worldsheet fields satisfying (4). In fact, Eq. (20) contains a term proportional to M, so the reconstructed density depends on the black hole mass, whereas the string-cloud T in Eq. (3) is fixed by the cloud density and worldsheet embedding and has no such M-dependence in the original Alencar solution. The choice c=1, β=2 is justified only by regularity. Thus the title/abstract conclusion that these are black holes 'sourced by the new string cloud' is a claim about an engineered fluid, not a derived propert
  2. [V, Eqs. (33)-(35)] Equation (34) for the Hawking temperature is presented without derivation. Starting from (11), f'(r_h) contains a derivative of the hypergeometric function; obtaining the compact sqrt(1+r_h^4/r0^4) form requires a nontrivial identity that is never stated. Since (34) feeds directly into the heat capacity (36), the Rényi temperature (38), and the topological analysis, this is load-bearing for the thermodynamic results. Similarly, Eq. (35) is obtained by integrating dM=T_H dS_bh with a and r0 held fixed; the integration constant and the fixed-parameter assumption should be stated explicitly. I do not claim the formulas are wrong, but the derivation needs to be given in an appendix or by quoting the hypergeometric identity.
minor comments (6)
  1. [III, Eq. (14)] The text claims that all curvature invariants are finite, but only the Kretschmann scalar is computed. Since the near-origin expansion f=1+|a|r^2/r0^2+O(r^3) bounds the Riemann components, the claim is plausible; please state which invariants were checked or give the limiting expressions for f', f'', (1-f)/r^2.
  2. [V, Eq. (35)] The abstract's phrase 'entropy depends only on the regularization scale' is too strong: Eq. (35) also depends on r_h. The a-independence is only of the explicit functional form; please rephrase to avoid confusion.
  3. [IV, text after Eq. (31)] 'your limits give' should be 'the limits give'.
  4. [Figures 9-11 captions] Several captions write 'r0=0,1' or 'a=0,1' instead of 'r0=0.1' or 'a=0.1'. Please correct.
  5. [Throughout] Typos such as 'vaccuum' (vacuum) and 'Renyí' (Rényi) appear; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  6. [III, Eq. (11)] The use of |a| is not discussed. In the original Letelier model a is positive; if negative values are allowed, the allowed sign and its physical meaning should be addressed, otherwise the absolute value should be removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction: the metric ansatz is openly assumed; all claimed results are derived by direct computation from it.

full rationale

No circular reduction identified. The construction starts from the externally cited Letelier-Alencar metric (Eq. 5) and explicitly introduces the rational Dagum factor as an ansatz in Eq. (11), with (c,beta)=(1,2) chosen by a stated regularity criterion. This regulator is an input assumption, not a derived prediction. The density and pressures are then reconstructed from Einstein equations (26)-(27), and all thermodynamic quantities, entropy, temperature, mass, heat capacity, and shadow radius are direct consequences of the assumed metric. The entropy depending only on r0 (Eq. 35) follows from integrating the first law and is not imposed by construction. The EHT comparison uses external data only to constrain parameters. The self-citations used in the text are not load-bearing for the main result. The unsupported identification of the reconstructed anisotropic fluid with the Nambu-Goto string-cloud stress tensor (Eqs. 3-4) is a physical-interpretation gap rather than circularity, because no claimed output reduces to its input by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed metric ansatz and the physical identification of the source. The free parameters are a, r0, M, and λ, plus the hand-chosen regulator exponents c=1, β=2. No new particles, fields, or conserved quantities are introduced; the string cloud and entropy frameworks are taken from prior literature.

free parameters (5)
  • String cloud parameter a = not fitted; chosen in plots (e.g. 0.1-0.3) and constrained by shadow band overlap
    Introduced in the Letelier string cloud metric and retained in the regularized solution; controls the deficit angle and temperature profile.
  • Regularization scale r0 = not fitted; chosen in plots (e.g. 0.1-0.5)
    Sets the core size and enters all curvature invariants, entropy, and shadow radius.
  • Black hole mass M = input; in thermodynamic analysis re-expressed as M(r_h)
    The ADM mass is an input; the horizon mass function (33) is used to derive thermodynamic quantities.
  • Renyi non-extensivity parameter λ = chosen as 0.1 or 0.5 for plots
    Deformation parameter in the Renyi entropy, used in the stability and topological analysis.
  • Dagum regulator exponents c=1, β=2 = chosen by hand
    The rational regulator is claimed to be the minimal choice for finite curvature invariants, but this is asserted rather than proven or derived.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Einstein field equations with an anisotropic fluid source, T_μν = diag(-ρ, pr, pt, pt)
    Used to translate the metric ansatz into density and pressures via Eqs. (26)-(27); assumes classical general relativity.
  • domain assumption The Letelier-Alencar string cloud stress tensor from the Nambu-Goto action, including a magnetic-like component
    The starting point (Eqs. 3-5) is taken from [44]; the present solution inherits the physical status of that source.
  • domain assumption Regularity is defined as finiteness of curvature invariants at r=0
    The paper uses K(r) finite as the criterion for a regular black hole, which is standard in this literature.
  • domain assumption Zaslavskii's Tolman-mass integral constraint implying SEC violation in static interior regions
    Invoked in Section IV to interpret the energy-condition plots.
  • domain assumption Renyi non-extensive entropy and Wei-Liu-Mann topological thermodynamics frameworks
    Used in Sections VI to reformulate stability and phase behavior; these are imported from prior literature.
  • standard math Hypergeometric identity F - rF' = sqrt(1 + r^4/r0^4) for the specific 2F1 function
    Needed to obtain the compact temperature expression (34); the identity is true by hypergeometric contiguous relations but is not proved in the paper.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 18883 in / 40813 out tokens · 287658 ms · 2026-08-03T22:14:40.467073+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We construct a new family of regular black hole solutions supported by the novel Letelier-Alencar string cloud and regularized through a rational Dagum-type distribution. The regulator smooths the matter profile and ensures finite curvature invariants, yielding a geometry that interpolates between a string-cloud exterior and an anti--de Sitter core. We analyze the energy conditions, identifying where the null, weak, dominant and strong conditions hold or fail across the core and exterior. The parameter space for horizon formation is mapped and the thermodynamic propertie -- mass, Hawking temperature, entropy and heat capacity -- are derived; notably, the entropy depends only on the regularization scale while the string parameter modifies temperature and heat capacity. Employing R\'enyi non-extensive entropy and the topological thermodynamics approach, we show the non-extensive deformation stabilizes the system and removes the standard phase transition. Finally, we compute the shadow radius and derive constraints compatible with current Event Horizon Telescope bounds for Sgr~A* and M87*.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.11419 by C. R. Muniz, Francisco Bento Lustosa, Francisco Tiago Barboza Sampaio, Jonathan Alves Rebou\c{c}as, Leonardo Tavares de Oliveira.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left panel: Kretschmann scalar as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Parameter space (M, a) of the regularized new string cloud black hole. The shaded region indicates the values of the parameters yielding black hole solutions with event horizons, bounded by the critical line where the horizon degenerates. Beyond this boundary, the spacetime describes no black hole. The regularization core radius is set to r0 = 0.1 (left panel) and r0 = 0.5 (right panel). of f(r) = 0, corre… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Contours of the energy density ρ(r). In the left panel, we set r0 = 0.7 and M = 1; larger a expands the inner region with ρ < 0. In the right panel, we set a = 0.4 and M = 1; increasing r0 moves the ρ peak to larger r and reduces its amplitude. The line ρ = 0 marks the WEC threshold [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Contours of the tangential WEC (WECt). In the left panel, we set r0 = 0.7 and M = 1; larger a drives ρ + pt more negative at fixed r and shifts the ρ + pt = 0 curve outward. In the right panel, we set a = 0.4 and M = 1; increasing r0 raises ρ + pt and moves its maximum to larger r. The line ρ + pt = 0 marks the boundary of the WECt domain. AdS core favors a negative WECt band away from r= 0, whose extent g… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Contours of the SEC. In the top-left panel, we set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Contours of the tangential DEC (DECt). in the left panel, we set r0 = 0.7 and M = 1; larger a shifts the DECt = 0 line outward and reduces the inner region where DECt > 0 (DEC satisfied). In the right panel, we set a = 0.4 and M = 1. The contour DECt = 0 marks the DEC boundary. a = 0.0 a = 0.1 a = 0.2 a = 0.3 0 1 2 3 4 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 rh M r0 = 0.0 r0 = 0.1 r0 = 0.2 r0 = 0.3 rh min 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The black hole mass as a function of the event horizon radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Hawking temperature as a function of the event horizon radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Heat capacity as a function of the event horizon radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Rényi temperature, for λ = 0.1, as a function of the event horizon radius rh. In the left panel, the dependence on the string cloud parameter (r0 = 0, 1) is shown, while in the right panel the variation with the regularization parameter (a = 0, 1) is displayed, with the blue curve indicating the Schwarzschild black hole. a = 0.0 a = 0.1 a = 0.2 a = 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0 20 40 60 80 rh C R … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Rényi heat capacity, for λ = 0.1, as a function of the event horizon radius rh. In the left panel, the dependence on the string cloud parameter (r0 = 0, 1) is shown, while in the right panel the variation with the regularization parameter (a = 0, 1) is displayed, with the blue curve indicating the Schwarzschild black hole. VI. BLACK HOLES AS TOPOLOGICAL DEFECTS Recently, Wei et al. [52] showed that black … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Top panels: Phase-space vector field (rh, Θ) for τ = 100. Left: With standard black hole entropy (λ = 0), showing two states – stable (W = +1) and unstable (W = −1) – separated by a phase transition. Right: With Rényi entropy (λ = 0.5), exhibiting a single stable microscopic state (W = +1). Bottom panels: Respective τ (rh) parameter at the zero points. Left: With a local minimum at the transition point. R… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Top panel: Shadow radius Rsh/M as a function of the cloud parameter a for different values of the regularization parameter r0. The colored curves represent the theoretical predictions from the photon sphere condition, while the shaded regions correspond to the observational ranges of Sgr A* (purple band, 4.55 ≤ Rsh/M ≤ 5.22) and M87* (purple plus pink bands, 4.22 ≤ Rsh/M ≤ 6.05), as reported by the EHT Co… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Geometrically Regular Black Object Solutions in Lower-Dimensional Gauss-Bonnet Gravity and Its Unimodular Extension

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Regular black-hole and black-bounce solutions are derived in lower-dimensional EGB gravity using nonlinear electrodynamics or unimodular extensions, with thermodynamics showing modified evaporation, remnants, and phas...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 26 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bertiet al., Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 243001 (2015)

    E. Bertiet al., Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 243001 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Akiyama, A

    K. Akiyama, A. Alberdi, W. Alef, K. Asada, R. Azulay, A.-K. Baczko, D. Ball, M. Baloković, J. Barrett, D. Bintley,et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters875, L4 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Planck Collaboration, A&A641, A1 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Ishak, Living Reviews in Relativity22(2019), 10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4

    M. Ishak, Living Reviews in Relativity22(2019), 10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4

    doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 2019

  8. [8]

    Penrose, Phys

    R. Penrose, Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 57 (1965)

    1965

  9. [9]

    S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 444 (1966)

    1966

  10. [10]

    Konoplich, S

    R. Konoplich, S. G. Rubin, A. Sakharov, and M. Y. Khlopov, Physics of Atomic Nuclei62, 1593 (1999)

    1999

  11. [11]

    M. Y. Khlopov, R. V. Konoplich, S. G. Rubin, and A. S. Sakharov, Gravitation & Cosmology2, 1 (1999)

    1999

  12. [12]

    Rovelli,Quantum gravity(Cambridge university press, 2004)

    C. Rovelli,Quantum gravity(Cambridge university press, 2004)

    2004

  13. [13]

    Ashtekar, A

    A. Ashtekar, A. del Río, and M. Schneider, Gen. Rel. Grav.54, 45 (2022), arXiv:2205.00298 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Bambi, ed.,Regular Black Holes, 1st ed., Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology (Springer Singapore, 2023) pp

    C. Bambi, ed.,Regular Black Holes, 1st ed., Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology (Springer Singapore, 2023) pp. X+499

    2023

  15. [15]

    Penrose, Riv

    R. Penrose, Riv. Nuovo Cim.1, 252 (1969)

    1969

  16. [16]

    R. M. Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time and Black Hole Thermodynamics, Chicago Lectures in Physics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1995). 20

    1995

  17. [17]

    G. E. Romero and G. S. Vila,Introduction to Black Hole Astrophysics, 1st ed., Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014) pp. XVIII+318

    2014

  18. [18]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D7, 2333 (1973)

    1973

  19. [19]

    R. M. Wald, Living reviews in relativity4, 6 (2001)

    2001

  20. [20]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035002 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    The ads/cft correspondence,

    J. Maldacena, “The ads/cft correspondence,” inHandbook of Quantum Gravity, edited by C. Bambi, L. Modesto, and I. Shapiro (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023) pp. 1–24

    2023

  22. [22]

    Novello and S

    M. Novello and S. P. Bergliaffa, Physics Reports463, 127 (2008)

    2008

  23. [23]

    Ayón-Beato and A

    E. Ayón-Beato and A. García, General Relativity and Gravitation37, 635 (2005)

    2005

  24. [24]

    P. G. S. Fernandes, P. Carrilho, T. Clifton, and D. J. Mulryne, Phys. Rev. D102, 024025 (2020), arXiv:2004.08362 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Ishibashi, N

    A. Ishibashi, N. Ohta, and D. Yamaguchi, Physical Review D104, 066016 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, Commun. math. Phys31, 161 (1973)

    1973

  27. [27]

    Dymnikova, General relativity and gravitation24, 235 (1992)

    I. Dymnikova, General relativity and gravitation24, 235 (1992)

    1992

  28. [28]

    S. A. Hayward, Physical review letters96, 031103 (2006)

    2006

  29. [29]

    Ayón-Beato and A

    E. Ayón-Beato and A. García, Physical Review Letters80, 5056 (1998)

    1998

  30. [30]

    V. P. Frolov, Phys. Rev. D94, 104056 (2016), arXiv:1609.01758 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Nicolini, International Journal of Modern Physics A24, 1229 (2009)

    P. Nicolini, International Journal of Modern Physics A24, 1229 (2009)

    2009

  32. [32]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. Odintsov, and V. Oikonomou, Physics Reports692, 1 (2017), modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution

    2017

  33. [33]

    L. C. Nunes dos Santos, Phys. Rev. D111, 064032 (2025), arXiv:2502.15846 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    P. S. Letelier, Physical Review D20, 1294 (1979)

    1979

  35. [35]

    P. S. Letelier, Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996)63, 519 (1981)

    1971

  36. [36]

    Kiritsis,String Theory in a Nutshell, 2nd ed

    E. Kiritsis,String Theory in a Nutshell, 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, 2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    H. H. Soleng, Gen. Rel. Grav.27, 367 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9412053

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  38. [38]

    Capozziello, V

    S. Capozziello, V. F. Cardone, G. Lambiase, and A. Troisi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15, 69 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0601266

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  39. [39]

    Martin, Comptes Rendus Physique13, 566 (2012), understanding the Dark Universe

    J. Martin, Comptes Rendus Physique13, 566 (2012), understanding the Dark Universe

    2012

  40. [40]

    H. E. S. Velten, R. F. vom Marttens, and W. Zimdahl, The European Physical Journal C74, 3160 (2014)

    2014

  41. [41]

    Dymnikova and M

    I. Dymnikova and M. Khlopov, International Journal of Modern Physics D24, 1545002 (2015)

    2015

  42. [42]

    Dymnikova, Classical and Quantum Gravity21, 4417 (2004)

    I. Dymnikova, Classical and Quantum Gravity21, 4417 (2004)

    2004

  43. [43]

    Kar and S

    A. Kar and S. Kar, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 773 (2025), arXiv:2504.12042 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Alencar, R

    G. Alencar, R. Landim, and R. C. Filho, Physics of the Dark Universe49, 102031 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Alencar, M

    G. Alencar, M. Estrada, C. R. Muniz, and G. J. Olmo, JCAP11, 100 (2023), arXiv:2309.03920 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Estrada and C

    M. Estrada and C. R. Muniz, JCAP03, 055 (2023), arXiv:2301.05037 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Dagum, Statistica66, 235 (2006)

    C. Dagum, Statistica66, 235 (2006)

    2006

  48. [48]

    Balart and E

    L. Balart and E. C. Vagenas, Physics Letters B730, 14 (2014)

    2014

  49. [49]

    Kastor, S

    D. Kastor, S. Ray, and J. Traschen, Classical and Quantum Gravity26, 195011 (2009)

    2009

  50. [50]

    Rehan, S

    M. Rehan, S. U. Islam, and S. G. Ghosh, Scientific Reports14, 13875 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Wei and Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D105, 104003 (2022), arXiv:2112.01706 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Wei, Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei, Y.-X. Liu, and R. B. Mann, Physical Review Letters129, 191101 (2022)

    2022

  53. [53]

    Kubizňák and R

    D. Kubizňák and R. B. Mann, Journal of High Energy Physics2012, 33 (2012), arXiv:1205.0559 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  54. [54]

    Wei and Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 111302 (2015), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 116, 169903 (2016)], arXiv:1502.00386 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    Wei, Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei, Y.-X. Liu, and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 071103 (2019), arXiv:1906.10840 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Wei, Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei, Y.-X. Liu, and R. B. Mann, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2108.07655 (2021), arXiv:2108.07655 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Rényi, Acta Math.10, 193 (1959)

    A. Rényi, Acta Math.10, 193 (1959)

    1959

  58. [58]

    Tsallis, J

    C. Tsallis, J. Statist. Phys.52, 479 (1988)

    1988

  59. [59]

    Tsallis and L

    C. Tsallis and L. J. L. Cirto, The European Physical Journal C73, 2487 (2013)

    2013

  60. [60]

    T. S. Biró and V. G. Czinner, Phys. Lett. B726, 861 (2013), arXiv:1309.4261 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  61. [61]

    V. G. Czinner and H. Iguchi, Phys. Lett. B752, 306 (2016), arXiv:1511.06963 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    V. G. Czinner and H. Iguchi, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 892 (2017), arXiv:1702.05341 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    Okyay and A

    M. Okyay and A. Övgün, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022, 009 (2022)

    2022

  64. [64]

    Övgün and R

    A. Övgün and R. C. Pantig, Physics Letters B864, 139398 (2025)

    2025

  65. [65]

    Jiang, C

    H.-X. Jiang, C. Liu, I. K. Dihingia, Y. Mizuno, H. Xu, T. Zhu, and Q. Wu, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2024, 059 (2024), arXiv:2312.04288 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Balart and E

    L. Balart and E. C. Vagenas, Phys. Rev. D90, 124045 (2014), arXiv:1408.0306 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Zaslavskii, Physics Letters B688, 278 (2010)

    O. Zaslavskii, Physics Letters B688, 278 (2010)

    2010

  68. [68]

    K. A. Bronnikov, Physical Review D63, 044005 (2001)

    2001

  69. [69]

    Jizba and T

    P. Jizba and T. Arimitsu, Annals Phys.312, 17 (2004), arXiv:cond-mat/0207707

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  70. [70]

    Liu, Y.-F

    F.-Y. Liu, Y.-F. Mai, W.-Y. Wu, and Y. Xie, Phys. Lett. B795, 475 (2019)

    2019

  71. [71]

    Jusufi, M

    K. Jusufi, M. Azreg-Aïnou, M. Jamil, S.-W. Wei, Q. Wu, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D103, 024013 (2021), arXiv:2008.08450 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Demir, and A

    İrfan Çimdiker, D. Demir, and A. Övgün, Physics of the Dark Universe34, 100900 (2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    R. C. Pantig and A. Övgün, Annals of Physics448, 169197 (2023)

    2023

  74. [74]

    W. Liu, D. Wu, and J. Wang, Phys. Lett. B858, 139052 (2024), arXiv:2408.05569 [gr-qc]. 21

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Perlick and O

    V. Perlick and O. Y. Tsupko, Phys. Rept.947, 1 (2022), arXiv:2105.07101 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022