pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.15127 · v4 · submitted 2025-11-19 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE· hep-ex

Potential divergence in tracing μ and τ flavors of astrophysical neutrinos

Zhi-zhong Xing This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 21:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEhep-ex
keywords astrophysical neutrinosflavor ratiosmu-tau symmetrylepton mixing matrixIceCube fluxneutrino oscillationssource flavor composition
0
0 comments X

The pith

A potential divergence appears when trying to trace separate muon and tau flavor fractions of astrophysical neutrinos back to their sources, caused by the mu-tau interchange symmetry in the lepton mixing matrix.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives general expressions that convert the flavor ratios of high-energy neutrinos measured at a telescope into the original flavor fractions produced at a distant astrophysical source. It shows that these expressions contain a mathematical divergence in the individual muon and tau fractions as a direct result of the mu-tau symmetry present in the three-by-three neutrino mixing matrix. In the exact symmetry limit the formulas simplify so that only the electron fraction and the sum of the muon-plus-tau fractions remain finite and extractable. The authors supply closed-form expressions that incorporate small symmetry-breaking parameters and apply them to IceCube all-sky flux measurements under the assumption of uniform source composition. This work clarifies the practical limits on flavor reconstruction for cosmic neutrinos.

Core claim

General formulas exist for the source flavor fractions (η_e, η_μ, η_τ) expressed in terms of the observed flavor ratios (f_e, f_μ, f_τ); these formulas exhibit a potential divergence in η_μ and η_τ that follows unavoidably from the μ-τ interchange symmetry in the mixing matrix U, and only η_e together with η_μ + η_τ can be obtained from a precision measurement of f_e and f_μ = f_τ when the symmetry is exact.

What carries the argument

The μ-τ interchange symmetry in the 3×3 lepton flavor mixing matrix U, which produces the divergence when the observed ratios are inverted to recover the source fractions.

If this is right

  • Only the electron fraction and the combined muon-plus-tau fraction remain extractable when the exact μ-τ symmetry holds.
  • Small explicit breaking of the symmetry allows separate extraction of η_μ and η_τ but introduces numerical instabilities near the symmetry limit.
  • Application to IceCube data yields constraints on the size of μ-τ breaking parameters once the common-source assumption is adopted.
  • Precision measurements of f_e and f_μ = f_τ alone are insufficient to resolve all three source fractions without symmetry breaking.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future neutrino telescopes may need to incorporate independent handles on symmetry breaking, such as energy-dependent oscillation effects, to avoid the divergence region.
  • The same symmetry that limits flavor reconstruction here could also affect interpretations of neutrino flavor ratios in other high-energy astrophysical environments.
  • If the divergence persists in real data, it would point to either larger symmetry breaking or to source-to-source variations in flavor composition.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the relevant astrophysical sources all share a common flavor composition when the formulas are applied to IceCube all-sky neutrino flux data.

What would settle it

An IceCube or future telescope data set in which the calculated values of η_μ or η_τ become negative or diverge to infinity while the observed ratios remain finite would show that the inversion formulas cannot be applied without additional symmetry-breaking terms.

read the original abstract

We derive general formulas for three flavor fractions $(\eta^{}_e , \eta^{}_\mu , \eta^{}_\tau)$ of the high-energy neutrinos originating from a remote astrophysical source by using their flavor ratios $(f^{}_e , f^{}_\mu , f^{}_\tau)$ observed at a neutrino telescope, and diagnose a potential divergence associated with $\eta^{}_\mu$ and $\eta^{}_\tau$ as an unavoidable consequence of the $\mu$-$\tau$ interchange symmetry exhibiting in the $3\times 3$ lepton flavor mixing matrix $U$. We present a complete set of analytical expressions for $(\eta^{}_e , \eta^{}_\mu , \eta^{}_\tau)$ as functions of two typical $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking parameters in the standard parametrization of $U$, and apply it to the recent IceCube all-sky neutrino flux data ranging from 5 TeV to 10 PeV in the assumption that the relevant sources have a common flavor composition. We also explain why only $\eta^{}_e$ and $\eta^{}_\mu + \eta^{}_\tau$ can be extracted from a precision measurement of $f^{}_e$ and $f^{}_\mu = f^{}_\tau$ in the exact $\mu$-$\tau$ flavor symmetry limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper derives general formulas for the three flavor fractions (η_e, η_μ, η_τ) of high-energy neutrinos from a remote astrophysical source using observed flavor ratios (f_e, f_μ, f_τ) at a neutrino telescope. It diagnoses a potential divergence in η_μ and η_τ as an unavoidable consequence of the μ-τ interchange symmetry in the 3×3 lepton flavor mixing matrix U. The manuscript provides a complete set of analytical expressions for these fractions as functions of two typical μ-τ symmetry breaking parameters in the standard parametrization of U, applies the formalism to IceCube all-sky neutrino flux data from 5 TeV to 10 PeV assuming common flavor composition for sources, and explains why only η_e and η_μ + η_τ can be extracted in the exact symmetry limit from precision measurements of f_e and f_μ = f_τ.

Significance. If the derivation of the symmetry-induced divergence holds, the result is significant because it identifies a fundamental limitation in uniquely tracing separate μ and τ flavors of astrophysical neutrinos, with implications for interpreting high-energy neutrino telescope data. The closed-form analytical expressions in two breaking parameters provide a practical regularization tool, and the IceCube application illustrates the effect in a data-driven context. Credit is due for the explicit parametrization and the clear explanation of the exact-symmetry limit.

major comments (1)
  1. [IceCube application] In the application to IceCube all-sky neutrino flux data (as outlined in the abstract), the formulas are inverted under the assumption that every contributing source shares identical η. Because the observed f is an incoherent sum over potentially heterogeneous sources, the extracted η_μ and η_τ (and any apparent divergence) need not correspond to any physical source; the divergence diagnosis is then an artifact of the averaging rather than a property of individual sources. This assumption is load-bearing for the data-interpretation claim and requires either justification or a more general treatment that accounts for source diversity.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'two typical μ-τ symmetry breaking parameters' without naming them; the main text should explicitly identify these parameters (e.g., by equation number) at first use to improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for highlighting an important point about the assumptions underlying our IceCube application. We address the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity on this issue.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [IceCube application] In the application to IceCube all-sky neutrino flux data (as outlined in the abstract), the formulas are inverted under the assumption that every contributing source shares identical η. Because the observed f is an incoherent sum over potentially heterogeneous sources, the extracted η_μ and η_τ (and any apparent divergence) need not correspond to any physical source; the divergence diagnosis is then an artifact of the averaging rather than a property of individual sources. This assumption is load-bearing for the data-interpretation claim and requires either justification or a more general treatment that accounts for source diversity.

    Authors: The referee correctly observes that the IceCube all-sky flux represents an incoherent superposition over many sources that could in principle possess different flavor compositions η. Our analysis explicitly invokes the assumption of a common η for the contributing sources, as stated in the abstract and Section 4. This is the standard working hypothesis in the literature for interpreting diffuse high-energy neutrino data in the absence of source-by-source flavor information. Under this assumption the inversion yields effective (averaged) values of η_e, η_μ and η_τ. The mathematical divergence between η_μ and η_τ remains a direct consequence of the μ-τ symmetry in the mixing matrix and is therefore present even when the input f is itself an average; it signals that separate μ and τ fractions cannot be uniquely recovered from precision measurements of f_e and f_μ = f_τ. We have added a new paragraph in the discussion section that (i) reiterates the common-composition assumption, (ii) justifies it on the basis of current observational limitations, and (iii) explicitly notes that the extracted parameters should be understood as effective quantities rather than source-specific ones. A fully general multi-source treatment would require additional data or model assumptions that lie outside the scope of the present work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation from standard PMNS matrix and μ-τ symmetry is self-contained

full rationale

The paper starts from the established 3×3 lepton mixing matrix U in its standard parametrization and the averaged oscillation probabilities P_αβ = ∑_i |U_αi|^2 |U_βi|^2 to derive explicit analytical expressions for the source flavor fractions η_e, η_μ, η_τ in terms of observed f and two μ-τ breaking parameters. The diagnosed divergence when the breaking parameters vanish follows directly from the resulting singular linear map (degenerate μ and τ rows), which is a mathematical property of the symmetry and not an internal fit or redefinition. The IceCube application explicitly invokes the common-composition assumption as an external premise rather than deriving or fitting it from the data inside the paper. No step reduces to a self-citation chain, fitted input renamed as prediction, or ansatz smuggled via prior work; the central expressions remain independent of the target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard three-flavor mixing framework, the mu-tau interchange symmetry as a domain property of U, and the common-source-composition assumption for data application. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • two typical mu-tau symmetry breaking parameters
    Introduced in the standard parametrization of U to express the source fractions eta as functions of observed f.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The 3x3 lepton flavor mixing matrix U exhibits mu-tau interchange symmetry
    Invoked directly as the origin of the diagnosed divergence in the derivation of eta from f.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5542 in / 1220 out tokens · 34766 ms · 2026-05-17T21:24:18.238532+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fate of $\theta_{12}$ under $\mu-\tau$ Reflection Symmetry in Light of the First JUNO Results

    hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A model with μ-τ reflection symmetry from A4 predicts sin²θ12 ≳ 0.335 which is disfavored by JUNO results, leaving a surviving scenario with testable correlations to model parameters.

  2. Implications of the First JUNO Results for Dirac Neutrino Texture Zeros

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    JUNO data strongly disfavors Dirac neutrino texture zero pattern C, leaving only patterns A1 and A2 compatible with current oscillation observables.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 17 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    High-energy neutrino astrophysics,

    J. G. Learned and K. Mannheim, “High-energy neutrino astrophysics,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.50(2000), 679-749

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    High-energy Neutrino Astronomy: The Cosmic Ray Connection

    F. Halzen and D. Hooper, “High-energy neutrino astronomy: The Cosmic ray connection,” Rept. Prog. Phys.65(2002), 1025-1078 [arXiv:astro-ph/0204527 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  3. [3]

    Measuring Flavor Ratios of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos

    J. F. Beacom, N. F. Bell, D. Hooper, S. Pakvasa and T. J. Weiler, “Measuring Flavor Ratios of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D68(2003), 093005 [erratum: Phys. Rev. D72(2005), 019901] [arXiv:hep-ph/0307025 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    High-energy neutrinos in the context of multimessenger physics

    J. K. Becker, “High-energy neutrinos in the context of multimessenger physics,” Phys. Rept. 458(2008), 173-246 [arXiv:0710.1557 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    Mesonium and anti-mesonium,

    B. Pontecorvo, “Mesonium and anti-mesonium,” Sov. Phys. JETP6(1957) 429 [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.33(1957) 549]

    work page 1957

  6. [6]

    Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles,

    Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata, “Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles,” Prog. Theor. Phys.28(1962) 870

    work page 1962

  7. [7]

    Neutrino Experiments and the Problem of Conservation of Leptonic Charge,

    B. Pontecorvo, “Neutrino Experiments and the Problem of Conservation of Leptonic Charge,” Sov. Phys. JETP26(1968) 984 [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.53(1967) 1717]

    work page 1968

  8. [8]

    Abbasiet al., (2025), arXiv:2510.24957 [astro-ph.HE]

    R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, S. K. Agarwalla, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, J. M. Alamed- dine, S. Ali, N. M. Amin and K. Andeen,et al.“Characterization of the Three-Flavor Compo- sition of Cosmic Neutrinos with IceCube,” [arXiv:2510.24957 [astro-ph.HE]]. 11

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    Observation of an ultra-high-energy cosmic neutrino with KM3NeT,

    S. Aielloet al.[KM3NeT], “Observation of an ultra-high-energy cosmic neutrino with KM3NeT,” Nature638(2025) no.8050, 376-382 [erratum: Nature640(2025), E3]

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Cosmic Neutrino Flavor Ratios with Broken $\nu_\mu-\nu_\tau$ Symmetry

    L. Fu, C. M. Ho and T. J. Weiler, “Cosmic Neutrino Flavor Ratios with Brokenν µ −ν τ Symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B718(2012), 558-565 [arXiv:1209.5382 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    Aspects of the Flavor Triangle for Cosmic Neutrino Propagation

    L. Fu, C. M. Ho and T. J. Weiler, “Aspects of the Flavor Triangle for Cosmic Neutrino Propa- gation,” Phys. Rev. D91(2015), 053001 [arXiv:1411.1174 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Tri-Bimaximal Mixing and the Neutrino Oscillation Data

    P. F. Harrison, D. H. Perkins and W. G. Scott, “Tri-bimaximal mixing and the neutrino oscil- lation data,” Phys. Lett. B530(2002), 167 [arXiv:hep-ph/0202074 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  13. [13]

    Nearly Tri-Bimaximal Neutrino Mixing and CP Violation

    Z. z. Xing, “Nearly tri bimaximal neutrino mixing and CP violation,” Phys. Lett. B533(2002), 85-93 [arXiv:hep-ph/0204049 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  14. [14]

    Some Simple Mixing and Mass Matrices for Neutrinos

    X. G. He and A. Zee, “Some simple mixing and mass matrices for neutrinos,” Phys. Lett. B 560(2003), 87-90 [arXiv:hep-ph/0301092 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  15. [15]

    Review of particle physics,

    S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.3, 030001

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Pontecorvo,Inverse beta processes and nonconservation of lepton charge,Zh

    A. Abuslemeet al.[JUNO], “First measurement of reactor neutrino oscillations at JUNO,” [arXiv:2511.14593 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Precision Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation at Kilometer-Scale Baselines by Daya Bay,

    F. P. Anet al.[Daya Bay], “Precision Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation at Kilometer-Scale Baselines by Daya Bay,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) no.16, 161802 [arXiv:2211.14988 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Neutrino Telescopes as a Probe of Broken $\mu$-$\tau$ Symmetry

    Z. z. Xing, “Neutrino Telescopes as a Probe of Broken mu- tau Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D74 (2006), 013009 [arXiv:hep-ph/0605219 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  19. [19]

    Towards determination of the initial flavor composition of ultrahigh- energy neutrino fluxes with neutrino telescopes,

    Z. Z. Xing and S. Zhou, “Towards determination of the initial flavor composition of ultrahigh- energy neutrino fluxes with neutrino telescopes,” Phys. Rev. D74(2006), 013010 [arXiv:astro- ph/0603781 [astro-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2006

  20. [20]

    Implications of Leptonic Unitarity Violation at Neutrino Telescopes

    Z. z. Xing and S. Zhou, “Implications of Leptonic Unitarity Violation at Neutrino Telescopes,” Phys. Lett. B666(2008), 166-172 [arXiv:0804.3512 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  21. [21]

    The Glashow resonance as a discriminator of UHE cosmic neutrinos originating from p-gamma and p-p collisions

    Z. z. Xing and S. Zhou, “The Glashow resonance as a discriminator of UHE cosmic neutrinos originating from p-gamma and p-p collisions,” Phys. Rev. D84(2011), 033006 [arXiv:1105.4114 [hep-ph]]. 12

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Theoretically palatable flavor combinations of astrophysical neutrinos

    M. Bustamante, J. F. Beacom and W. Winter, “Theoretically palatable flavor combinations of astrophysical neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) no.16, 161302 [arXiv:1506.02645 [astro- ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    Inferring the flavor of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos at their sources

    M. Bustamante and M. Ahlers, “Inferring the flavor of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos at their sources,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) no.24, 241101 [arXiv:1901.10087 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    The Future of High- Energy Astrophysical Neutrino Flavor Measurements,

    N. Song, S. W. Li, C. A. Arg¨ uelles, M. Bustamante and A. C. Vincent, “The Future of High- Energy Astrophysical Neutrino Flavor Measurements,” JCAP04(2021), 054 [arXiv:2012.12893 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Two-detector flavor sensitivity to ultrahigh-energy cosmic neutrinos,

    F. Testagrossa, D. F. G. Fiorillo and M. Bustamante, “Two-detector flavor sensitivity to ultrahigh-energy cosmic neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.8, 083026 [arXiv:2310.12215 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Flavor composition of ultrahigh- energy cosmic neutrinos: Measurement forecasts for in-ice radio-based EeV neutrino telescopes,

    A. Coleman, O. Ericsson, C. Glaser and M. Bustamante, “Flavor composition of ultrahigh- energy cosmic neutrinos: Measurement forecasts for in-ice radio-based EeV neutrino telescopes,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.2, 023044 [arXiv:2402.02432 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Capozzi, W

    F. Capozzi, W. Giar` e, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Melchiorri and A. Palazzo, “Neutrino masses and mixing: Entering the era of subpercent precision,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.9, 093006 [arXiv:2503.07752 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Updated bounds on the (1,2) neutrino oscillation parameters after first JUNO results,

    F. Capozzi, E. Lisi, F. Marcone, A. Marrone and A. Palazzo, “Updated bounds on the (1,2) neutrino oscillation parameters after first JUNO results,” [arXiv:2511.21650 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz, “NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,” JHEP12(2024), 216 [arXiv:2410.05380 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Lessons from the first JUNO results

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz, “Lessons from the first JUNO results,” [arXiv:2601.09791 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    A review of mu-tau flavor symmetry in neutrino physics

    Z. z. Xing and Z. h. Zhao, “A review ofµ-τflavor symmetry in neutrino physics,” Rept. Prog. Phys.79(2016) no.7, 076201 [arXiv:1512.04207 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    Xing,Theµ−τreflection symmetry of Majorana neutrinos,Rept

    Z. z. Xing, “Theµ-τreflection symmetry of Majorana neutrinos,” Rept. Prog. Phys.86(2023) no.7, 076201 [arXiv:2210.11922 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Xing,Flavor structures of charged fermions and massive neutrinos,Phys

    Z. z. Xing, “Flavor structures of charged fermions and massive neutrinos,” Phys. Rept.854 (2020) 1 [arXiv:1909.09610 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay

    F. P. Anet al.[Daya Bay], “Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012), 171803 [arXiv:1203.1669 [hep-ex]]. 13

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    Abubakaret al.(T2K, NOvA), Nature646, 818 (2025), arXiv:2510.19888 [hep-ex]

    S. Abubakaret al.[T2K and NOvA], “Joint neutrino oscillation analysis from the T2K and NOvA experiments,” Nature646(2025) no.8086, 818-824 [arXiv:2510.19888 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    IceCube-Gen2: the window to the extreme Universe,

    M. G. Aartsenet al.[IceCube-Gen2], “IceCube-Gen2: the window to the extreme Universe,” J. Phys. G48(2021) no.6, 060501 [arXiv:2008.04323 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Sensitivity of the KM3NeT/ARCA neutrino telescope to point-like neutrino sources,

    S. Aielloet al.[KM3NeT], “Sensitivity of the KM3NeT/ARCA neutrino telescope to point-like neutrino sources,” Astropart. Phys.111(2019), 100-110 [arXiv:1810.08499 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    A multi-cubic-kilometre neutrino telescope in the western Pacific Ocean,

    Z. P. Yeet al.[TRIDENT], “A multi-cubic-kilometre neutrino telescope in the western Pacific Ocean,” Nature Astron.7(2023) no.12, 1497-1505 [arXiv:2207.04519 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    The Recent Status of the HUNT Prototypes: 2025,

    Z. Zeng, Yin, Q.C., Gao, B., Liu, C., Huang, T.Q. and M. J. Chen, “The Recent Status of the HUNT Prototypes: 2025,” PoSICRC2025(2025), 1226 14

    work page 2025