Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 68 references

Quantum coherent dynamics of quasiclassical spacetimes

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Quasiclassical spacetimes evolve into superpositions of different geometries through a Hamiltonian built on nonorthogonal coherent states, recovering black hole evaporation as the most probable trajectory.

desk verdict A self-aware framework proposal for coherent-state spacetime dynamics that is cleanly executed but whose black-hole evaporation curve is a consistency check, not a derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.20759 v3 pith:MSNRICHV submitted 2025-11-25 gr-qc hep-thquant-ph

Sijia Wang , Achintya Sajeendran , Dong-han Yeom , Robert B. Mann , Joshua Foo This is my paper
classification gr-qchep-thquant-ph MSC 83C4581R3081S10 PACS 04.60.-m04.70.Dy
keywords quasiclassicalgeometriescoherentstatesnonorthogonalbasisquantumgravityblackholeevaporationunitaritygeometrytunnelingtight-bindingmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that quasiclassical geometries — spacetimes that satisfy the classical field equations of general relativity only approximately — should be regarded as coherent states, and that distinct such states are not perfectly orthogonal. Starting from that assumption, it constructs a Hamiltonian in the nonorthogonal coherent-state basis and shows that an initially localized geometry is driven, by its own unitary evolution, into a superposition of neighbouring geometries. Applied to a spherically symmetric neutral black hole, the framework reproduces the semiclassical mass-loss curve M_BH(t) ~ -t^(1/3) + const as the most probable trajectory of the full quantum wavefunction, rather than an externally imposed decay law. The authors present this as a generic dynamical mechanism for tunneling between geometries and as a hint that unitary black hole evaporation can emerge from coherent quantum dynamics.

What carries the argument

The central object is the nonorthogonal coherent-state basis |g_n> with overlap ε^{|n-m|}, and the Hamiltonian H = Σ E_n |g_n><g_n| written in that basis. To leading order in ε, an orthogonal basis can be constructed, |g^⊥_n> = |g_n> - ε|g_{n-1}>, in which the Hamiltonian becomes diagonal energies plus nearest-neighbour hopping of amplitude ε E_{n+1} — the tight-binding model of condensed matter physics. The hopping term is what drives an initially sharp geometry into a superposition of neighbouring geometries. For the black hole application, the spectrum E_n = E_0 + α n^{1/3} is the second ingredient: its finite differences mimic the black-body scaling dE/dt ~ 1/E^2, and the most probable t

What would settle it

Compute the inner product between two distinct quasiclassical geometry coherent states in linearized quantum gravity and check whether it decays as ε^{|n-m|} with small ε; if the overlap structure is different, or if no microscopic derivation yields the n^{1/3} spectrum, the predicted tunneling and the -t^{1/3} evaporation curve do not follow.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Central claim: gravitational dynamics for quasiclassical spacetimes should be written in a nonorthogonal coherent-state basis |g_n> with overlaps <g_n|g_m> = ε^{|n-m|}. Because nearby geometries are partially indistinguishable, the Hamiltonian acquires off-diagonal transitions: an initial geometry |g_n> coherently tunnels into |g_{n-1}> and |g_{n+1}>, then into higher branches. This supplies a dynamical mechanism for geometry tunneling that other quantum-gravity approaches often assume without explaining. For a spherically symmetric neutral black hole, choosing the spectrum E_n = E_0 + α n^{1/3} makes successive level spacings scale as ΔE/Δn ~ n^{-2/3} ~ E^{-2}, matching the black-body law.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Hamiltonian H = Σ E_n |g_n><g_n|, written in a coherent-state basis with overlaps ε^{|n-m|}, and for black holes a spectrum scaling as n^{1/3}, is the actual form of gravitational dynamics; the authors note this Hamiltonian was not derived from an underlying microscopic model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, quasiclassical geometries are not static labels but dynamical states: a peaked geometry spontaneously spreads into a superposition of different mass configurations under unitary evolution.
  • The semiclassical black hole evaporation curve would be a prediction of the coherent dynamics rather than an input, with quantum corrections automatically included at order ε.
  • Because the evolution is unitary with respect to a clock at infinity, the information loss that plagues semiclassical treatments could be avoided, with late-time revivals and collapses appearing in the fidelity of the black hole state.
  • The framework gives a concrete lattice-like model for quantum gravitational dynamics, making tools from nonrelativistic quantum mechanics applicable to geometry transitions.
  • The same coherent-state Hamiltonian can describe tunneling between topologically or geometrically distinct bulk configurations, not just black hole masses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the overlap parameter ε is the single free knob controlling the tunneling rate; if it is ever computed from linearized quantum gravity, the route the paper suggests, the framework would gain predictive power for realistic evaporation times and corrections.
  • Inference: the n^{1/3} spectrum is fixed by wanting the black-body law; a microscopic derivation that produced a different spectrum would yield a different most-probable evaporation curve, so the black-hole claim is testable against other quantization schemes.
  • Inference: the model's coherent geometry tunneling suggests that low-energy tests of superposed massive objects might in principle probe the nonorthogonality of spacetime coherent states, though the predicted overlaps are plausibly tiny.
  • Inference: the structural analogy with a cavity mode coupled to a multilevel atom indicates that analogue quantum simulators could emulate geometry tunneling, turning a formal gravitational claim into a table-top experiment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Hamiltonian formalism for quasiclassical gravitational geometries modeled as non-orthogonal coherent states. Starting from the Wheeler-DeWitt constraint with an ideal clock at infinity, the authors write H_G = Σ E_n |g_n⟩⟨g_n| with overlap ⟨g_n|g_m⟩ = e^{-β v(n,m)}, and take v(n,m)=|n-m|. They show that in an approximately orthogonalized basis this reduces to a tight-binding model with nearest-neighbor hopping, so an initially localized geometry tunnels into a superposition of geometries. Applying the model to a Schwarzschild black hole, they choose the spectrum E_n = E_0 + α n^{1/3} so that ΔE_n/Δn ∼ E_n^{-2}, and numerically find that the ridge of maximum fidelity follows the semiclassical evaporation curve M(t) = (M_0^3 − η t)^{1/3}. The paper claims this 'recovers' the semiclassical evaporation curve and offers a hint of unitary black-hole evaporation. Appendix A gives exact and perturbative solutions for the hopping dynamics; Appendix B attempts a microscopic toy model in terms of graviton modes.

Significance. If the proposed Hamiltonian and overlap structure were derived from a more fundamental theory, the paper would offer a concrete, tractable mechanism for quantum tunneling between geometries and a possible bridge between canonical quantum gravity and low-energy quantum-information approaches to spacetime superpositions. The paper is clearly written, and the algebraic derivations in Appendix A (Bessel-function solutions, perturbative coefficients) are coherent. The authors also deserve credit for explicitly acknowledging in the Conclusion that Eq. (5) is not derived from a microscopic model and is not unique. However, the central advertised result—recovering the semiclassical evaporation curve—is at present a consistency check of an imposed spectrum rather than an independent prediction. The significance of the paper therefore depends on how the authors choose to frame the result: as a toy model with non-unique inputs, it is a useful contribution; as a derivation of black-hole evaporation from coherent-state dynamics, it is overstated.

major comments (5)
  1. [Reproducing the Semiclassical Evaporation Curve, Eq. (9)] Equation (9) fixes the spectrum as E_n = E_0 + α n^{1/3} precisely so that ΔE_n/Δn ∼ n^{-2/3} ∼ E_n^{-2}, i.e., the discrete spectrum is chosen to encode the Stefan-Boltzmann law. The subsequent comparison of the fidelity ridge with M_BH(t) = (M_0^3 − η t)^{1/3}, where η is a free proportionality constant, therefore demonstrates consistency with the input assumption rather than an independent derivation. To support the claim that the evaporation curve is 'recovered', the authors should either derive the spectrum from a microscopic model, or explicitly present the result as a consistency check of the ansatz, and ideally show that alternative spectra do not produce the same ridge.
  2. [Coherent State Postulate, Eq. (5)] The Hamiltonian H = Σ E_n |g_n⟩⟨g_n| with exponential overlap v(n,m)=|n−m| is postulated, as the Conclusion concedes. The central results—tunneling and the evaporation curve—are consequences of this Hamiltonian, so they are conditional on the ansatz. The exponential form of the overlap is also asserted rather than derived; for ordinary coherent states the overlap is Gaussian in phase-space distance, which would change the hopping structure. Please either justify v(n,m)=|n−m| from a concrete limit (e.g., linearized quantum gravity) or clearly label the construction as a toy model with non-unique inputs.
  3. [Fig. 2 and Eq. (7)] F_n(t) = |⟨g_n|ψ_G(t)⟩|^2 is not a probability distribution because {|g_n⟩} is non-orthogonal. The authors state that this is valid 'up to O(ε^2) corrections', but with ε = 0.1 and N = 32 the cross-terms are comparable to the populations of neighboring states, so the 'most probable trajectory' (the ridge) may not correspond to the most probable geometry. The trajectory should be defined with a proper probability measure—for example, using the orthogonalized basis |g⊥_n⟩ or the norm of the projected state—and the numerical ridge should be re-examined under that measure.
  4. [Appendix B, Eq. (35)] The toy model in Appendix B uses a linear spectrum E_ñ = ñω and then claims consistency with 'the decreasing semiclassical path shown in Fig. 2(b)'. But Fig. 2(b) is the linear-spectrum simulation, which does not show a decreasing evaporation path; the decreasing path appears in Fig. 2(c) for the n^{1/3} spectrum. This internal inconsistency undermines the interpretation of the toy model and should be corrected.
  5. [Abstract and Conclusion] The statement that the framework 'provides a hint at how unitarity may be preserved' is not supported by any computation of entanglement or information flow. The Schrödinger evolution in Eq. (3) is unitary by construction; without modeling the radiation sector or computing the entropy of the reduced state, the connection to the black-hole information paradox is only analogical. Please either add a concrete information-theoretic measure or temper the claim to match what is actually demonstrated.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 2 and text] The text says 'We chose the initial state to be the highest energy state in the truncated Hilbert space, |ψ_G(0)⟩ = |g_N⟩', but the caption of Fig. 2(b) specifies N = 40 with initial state |g_20⟩, which is not the highest state. Please clarify which simulations this sentence applies to.
  2. [Abstract and Eq. (9)] The notation M_BH(t) ∼ −t^{1/3} + const is not the asymptotic form of (M_0^3 − ηt)^{1/3}; for large t the behavior is −(ηt)^{1/3} without an additive constant. Use the exact expression or a more precise asymptotic notation.
  3. [Coherent State Postulate] The support for the overlap formula via Ref. [44] would be easier to assess with an explicit equation or section number from that reference. As written, it is not clear that the cited work contains an inner product of the form of Eq. (5).
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (20)] The normalization constant C_j in Eq. (20) is written with a derivative of a Bessel function with respect to its order. Please specify the branch/regularization used for this derivative, since order derivatives of Bessel functions are not standard in most symbolic packages.
  5. [Eq. (8)] The Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian in Eq. (8) has time-dependent coefficients c_{nm}(t), whereas the standard semiclassical Jaynes-Cummings model has constant or slowly varying couplings. Please clarify whether this is a deliberate generalization and explain the analogy more precisely.
  6. [Appendix header] Minor typo: 'END MA TTER' should read 'END MATTER'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Black-hole evaporation curve is not independently predicted: Eq. (9) chooses the n^{1/3} spectrum to match the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and Fig. 2(c) displays that same law as the most probable trajectory.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 'Reproducing the Semiclassical Evaporation Curve of a Black Hole', Eq. (9) and Fig. 2(c)]
    "the Stefan-Boltzmann law in four spacetime dimensions predicts dE/dt ∼ A T^4 ∼ 1/E^2. Based on this, we apply our approach to the four-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole. In particular, the spectrum ¯En = ¯E0 + α n^{1/3} (α is a proportionality constant) gives rise to the finite-difference relation, Δ¯En/Δn ∼ n^{-2/3} ∼ ¯E^{-2}_n, (9) which is consistent with the semiclassical prediction. ... The white line shows that the trajectory of maximal fidelity reproduces the semiclassical evaporation curve M_BH(t) = (M^3_{0,BH} − ηt)^{1/3} ... Further assuming that Δn is a proxy for time ..., then f"

    The spectrum f(n)=n^{1/3} is chosen precisely so that dE/dn ∼ E^{-2}, which is the Stefan-Boltzmann law once Δn is identified with time. The 'most probable trajectory' is then compared with the solution of dE/dt ∼ E^{-2}, and the match is reported as recovering the semiclassical evaporation curve. This is not an independent prediction: the output relation M_BH(t) ∼ −t^{1/3} is the integral of the input relation (9), with the time-n correspondence assumed in the same paragraph. The paper itself states that n^{1/3} 'fixes the spectrum in consistency with the Stefan-Boltzmann law,' showing that the semiclassical curve was put in by construction.

full rationale

The nonorthogonal coherent-state hopping analysis, Eqs. (5)-(7) and Appendix A, is internally self-contained: given the Hamiltonian ansatz and the overlap ε^{|n-m|}, the tunneling and Bessel solutions follow mathematically. This part is not circular. The circularity is concentrated in the black-hole application. There, the n^{1/3} spectrum is not derived from the dynamics; it is selected so that ΔE_n/Δn ∼ E^{-2}, i.e. the Stefan-Boltzmann law. The subsequent matching of the ridge in Fig. 2(c) with M_BH(t) = (M^3_0 − ηt)^{1/3} is therefore a consistency check of the input spectrum rather than a prediction from coherent-state dynamics. The paper concedes that Eq. (5) was not obtained from an underlying microscopic model; this is a derivation gap, not circularity per se. No load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems were found; self-citations to prior work by the authors appear only as background, not as the argument's foundation. Overall, the central evaporation 'recovery' reduces to a fitted input, giving partial circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, fields, or dimensions are introduced; the coherent-state basis is a modeling choice, not a new entity. The free parameters are the overlap strength, the energy scale/spacing, and the evaporation rate constant, all set to make the desired dynamics emerge. The axioms include the existence of a gravitational Hilbert space, the decoupled ideal clock, the graviton-pair origin of overlaps, and the Stefan-Boltzmann-fitted spectrum.

free parameters (4)
  • overlap parameter ε = 0.1 in numerics
    Controls nonorthogonality of geometry states; β = -ln ε is said to depend on ℏ, c, G but no derivation is given; chosen by hand.
  • ground energy E0 = E0/α = 1/1000 in plots
    Sets the zero of energy scale for geometry states; arbitrary in the model.
  • level spacing scale α = relative to E0; spectrum E_n = E0 + α n^(1/3)
    Chosen ad hoc to reproduce the Stefan-Boltzmann law; α is the proportionality constant.
  • evaporation rate constant η = not specified in units
    Proportionality constant in the recovered curve M(t) = (M0^3 - η t)^(1/3); related to α, ε but introduced to match the semiclassical law.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption There exists a gravitational Hilbert space with a well-defined inner product over geometries, including a coherent-state basis (Eq. 5).
    Paper states 'we assume that, in a consistent theory of quantum gravity, such a construction exists' (Introduction).
  • domain assumption An ideal clock at infinity decouples from the gravitational degrees of freedom and implements Page-Wootters evolution (Eq. 3).
    Assumed in 'Time Evolution from the Wheeler-DeWitt Equation'; based on Refs [38-43].
  • ad hoc to paper The overlap between quasiclassical spacetime states arises entirely from virtual graviton pair production under background-field approximation, giving v(n,m)=|n-m|.
    Stated in 'Coherent State Postulate...': 'we assume that the inner product ... arises entirely from virtual graviton pair production'; no derivation from canonical quantum gravity.
  • ad hoc to paper The black-hole energy spectrum is E_n = E0 + α n^(1/3), chosen to satisfy the Stefan-Boltzmann finite-difference relation ΔE_n/Δn ∼ E_n^(-2).
    Eq. (9); the spectrum is fitted to the law whose semiclassical curve is later 'recovered.'
  • domain assumption The states |g_n> can be interpreted as coarse-grained geometry plus ingoing gravitational radiation, and tracing out outgoing modes yields evaporation (Appendix B).
    Toy model in Appendix B; no explicit map to the full gravitational Hilbert space.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum coherent dynamics of quasiclassical spacetimes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MSNRICHV

@misc{pith2026251120759,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum coherent dynamics of quasiclassical spacetimes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MSNRICHV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.20759}
}
read the original abstract

In a wide range of quantum gravity theories, quasiclassical geometries, which are solutions to the Einstein field equations approximately, are described by "coherent states." Here we propose a Hamiltonian formalism for gravitational dynamics with respect to this coherent state basis, which generates time evolution of the spacetime with respect to a clock at infinity. Since the coherent states are not orthogonal, an initial quasiclassical geometry is dynamically driven into a superposition of different amplitudes. Our framework provides a dynamical mechanism for tunneling between geometries that is ubiquitous in a number of approaches to quantum gravity, from loop quantum gravity to the Euclidean path integral. We apply our framework to the problem of black hole evaporation, providing a hint at how unitarity may be preserved with the inclusion of quantum corrections to the semiclassical evolution of the black hole.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.20759 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the phase space evolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Time-evolution of the fidelity Fn(t) = |⟨g¯n|ψG(t)⟩|2 for initial state |g¯15⟩ and different values of n for the projected state. Here, N = 15. (b) Fn(t) plotted as a function of (n, t), where individual black curves correspond to a single value of n. We assumed the linear spectrum E¯n = E¯0 + αn, truncated the Hilbert space at N = 40, and chose the initial state to be |g¯20⟩. (c) Toy model of black hole evapora… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Polchinski,String Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1998)

    J. Polchinski,String Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1998)

    1998

  2. [2]

    Kiefer,Quantum Gravity: Fourth Edition, Interna- tional Series of Monographs on Physics Series (Oxford University Press, 2025)

    C. Kiefer,Quantum Gravity: Fourth Edition, Interna- tional Series of Monographs on Physics Series (Oxford University Press, 2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    B. S. DeWitt, Quantum theory of gravity. 1. the canoni- cal theory, Phys. Rev.160, 1113 (1967)

    1967

  4. [4]

    B. S. DeWitt, Quantum theory of gravity. ii. the mani- festly covariant theory, Phys. Rev.162, 1195 (1967)

    1967

  5. [5]

    Rev.162, 1239 (1967)

    B.S.DeWitt,Quantumtheoryofgravity.iii.applications of the covariant theory, Phys. Rev.162, 1239 (1967)

    1967

  6. [6]

    J. A. Wheeler, Superspace and the nature of quantum geometrodynamics, Battelle Rencontres , 242 (1968)

    1968

  7. [7]

    Rovelli and F

    C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto,Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity: An Elementary Introduction to Quantum Grav- ity and Spinfoam Theory(Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Arnowitt, S

    R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, Dynamical structure and definition of energy in general relativity, Phys. Rev.116, 1322 (1959)

    1959

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    C. J. Isham, Canonical quantum gravity and the prob- lem of time, inIntegrable Systems, Quantum Groups, and Quantum Field Theories, edited by L. A. Ibort and M. A. Rodríguez (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1993) pp. 157–287

    1993

  2. [10]

    W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, Time and the interpre- tation of canonical quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D40, 2598 (1989)

    1989

  3. [11]

    K.V.Kuchař,Timeandinterpretationsofquantumgrav- ity, International Journal of Modern Physics D20, 3 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271811019347

    2011 doi

  4. [12]

    Anderson, Problem of time in quantum gravity, An- nalen der Physik524, 757 (2012)

    E. Anderson, Problem of time in quantum gravity, An- nalen der Physik524, 757 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Belenchia, R

    A. Belenchia, R. M. Wald, F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, Č. Brukner, and M. Aspelmeyer, Quantum superposition of massive objects and the quantization of gravity, Phys. Rev. D98, 126009 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Arrasmith, A

    A. Arrasmith, A. Albrecht, and W. H. Zurek, Decoher- ence of black hole superpositions by hawking radiation, Nature Communications10, 1024 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Christodoulou and C

    M. Christodoulou and C. Rovelli, On the possibility of laboratory evidence for quantum superposition of geome- tries, Physics Letters B792, 64 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    J. Foo, R. B. Mann, and M. Zych, Schrödinger’s cat for de Sitter spacetime, Classical and Quantum Gravity38, 115010 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    J. Foo, C. S. Arabaci, M. Zych, and R. B. Mann, Quan- tum signatures of black hole mass superpositions, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 181301 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    J. Foo, C. S. Arabaci, M. Zych, and R. B. Mann, Quan- tum superpositions of Minkowski spacetime, Phys. Rev. D107, 045014 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Suryaatmadja, C

    C. Suryaatmadja, C. S. Arabaci, M. P. G. Robbins, J. Foo, M. Zych, and R. B. Mann, Signatures of rotating black holes in quantum superposition, Phys. Rev. D110, 066018 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    X. Liu, C. Zeng, and J. Wang, Generation of quantum entanglement in superposed diamond spacetime, The Eu- ropean Physical Journal C85, 539 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Foo and M

    J. Foo and M. Zych, Superpositions of thermalisations in relativistic quantum field theory, Quantum9, 1629 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    J. Foo, R. B. Mann, and M. Zych, Schrödinger’s black hole cat, International Journal of Modern Physics D31, 2242016 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271822420160

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    L. Goel, E. A. Patterson, M. R. Preciado-Rivas, M. Tora- bian, R. B. Mann, and N. Afshordi, Accelerated detector in a superposed spacetime, Phys. Rev. D111, 025015 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    A. Akil, M. Cadoni, L. Modesto, M. Oi, and A. P. Sanna, 6 Semiclassical spacetimes at super-Planckian scales from delocalized sources, Phys. Rev. D108, 044051 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    J. An, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and J. Wang, Quantum nature of black hole and the superposition of fermionic field, The European Physical Journal C84, 1113 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Kaku and Y

    Y. Kaku and Y. Nambu, Gravitational entanglement wit- ness through einstein ring image, Phys. Rev. D111, 046026 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Pranzini and L

    N. Pranzini and L. Maccone, Gravitational quantum speed limit, Classical and Quantum Gravity42, 15LT01 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    J. a. P. M. Pitelli, B. S. Felipe, C. Dappiaggi, and E. Win- stanley, Quantum superposition of boundary conditions inpads 2, Phys. Rev. D111, 125011 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Castro-Ruiz, F

    E. Castro-Ruiz, F. Giacomini, A. Belenchia, and Č. Brukner, Quantum clocks and the temporal localis- ability of events in the presence of gravitating quantum systems, Nature Communications11, 2672 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Giacomini and Č

    F. Giacomini and Č. Brukner, Quantum superposition of spacetimes obeys Einstein’s equivalence principle, AVS Quantum Science4(2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Kabel, A.-C

    V. Kabel, A.-C. de la Hamette, E. Castro-Ruiz, and Č. Brukner, Quantum conformal symmetries for space- times in superposition, Quantum8, 1547 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    de la Hamette, V

    A.-C. de la Hamette, V. Kabel, E. Castro-Ruiz, and Č. Brukner, Quantum reference frames for an indefinite metric, Communications Physics6, 231 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Kabel, A.-C

    V. Kabel, A.-C. de la Hamette, L. Apadula, C. Cepol- laro, H. Gomes, J. Butterfield, and Č. Brukner, Quantum coordinates, localisation of events, and the quantum hole argument, Communications Physics8, 185 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    N. S. Móller, B. Sahdo, and N. Yokomizo, Gravitational quantum switch on a superposition of spherical shells, Quantum8, 1248 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    J. Foo, R. B. Mann, and M. Zych, Relativity and decoherence of spacetime superpositions (2025), arXiv:2302.03259 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    P. A. Höhn, A. Russo, and A. R. H. Smith, Matter rela- tivetoquantumhypersurfaces,Phys.Rev.D109,105011 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    V.D’Esposito, G.Fabiano, D.Frattulillo,andF.Mercati, Doubly Quantum Mechanics, Quantum9, 1721 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    A. R. H. Smith and M. Ahmadi, Quantizing time: Inter- acting clocks and systems, Quantum3, 160 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    D. N. Page and W. K. Wootters, Evolution without evo- lution: Dynamics described by stationary observables, Phys. Rev. D27, 2885 (1983)

    1983

  32. [40]

    W. K. Wootters, Time replaced by quantum correlations, Int. J. Th. Phys.23, 701 (1984)

    1984

  33. [41]

    D. N. Page, Time as an inaccessible observable, ITF preprint NSF-ITP-89-18 (1989)

    1989

  34. [42]

    A. R. H. Smith and M. Ahmadi, Quantum clocks observe classical and quantum time dilation, Nature Communi- cations11, 5360 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    P. A. Höhn, A. R. H. Smith, and M. P. E. Lock, Trinity of relational quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. D104, 066001 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Papadodimas and S

    K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, Remarks on the necessity and implications of state-dependence in the black hole interior, Phys. Rev. D93, 084049 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Lifschytz, S

    G. Lifschytz, S. D. Mathur, and M. Ortiz, A note on the semiclassical approximation in quantum gravity, Physical Review D53, 766–778 (1996)

    1996

  38. [46]

    Dasgupta, Semi-classical quantization of spacetimes with apparent horizons, Classical and Quantum Gravity 23, 635 (2006)

    A. Dasgupta, Semi-classical quantization of spacetimes with apparent horizons, Classical and Quantum Gravity 23, 635 (2006)

    2006

  39. [47]

    Dasgupta, Coherent states for black holes, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2003(08), 004

    A. Dasgupta, Coherent states for black holes, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2003(08), 004

  40. [48]

    Thiemann, Complexifier coherent states for quantum general relativity, Classical and Quantum Gravity23, 2063 (2006)

    T. Thiemann, Complexifier coherent states for quantum general relativity, Classical and Quantum Gravity23, 2063 (2006)

  41. [49]

    Thiemann, Gauge field theory coherent states (gcs): I

    T. Thiemann, Gauge field theory coherent states (gcs): I. general properties, Classical and Quantum Gravity18, 2025 (2001)

    2025

  42. [50]

    Thiemann and O

    T. Thiemann and O. Winkler, Gauge field theory coher- ent states (gcs): Ii. peakedness properties, Classical and Quantum Gravity18, 2561 (2001)

    2001

  43. [51]

    Thiemann and O

    T. Thiemann and O. Winkler, Gauge field theory coher- ent states (gcs): Iii. ehrenfest theorems, Classical and Quantum Gravity18, 4629 (2001)

    2001

  44. [52]

    Bojowald, Dynamical coherent states and physical so- lutions of quantum cosmological bounces, Phys

    M. Bojowald, Dynamical coherent states and physical so- lutions of quantum cosmological bounces, Phys. Rev. D 75, 123512 (2007)

    2007

  45. [53]

    Oriti, R

    D. Oriti, R. Pereira, and L. Sindoni, Coherent states in quantum gravity: a construction based on the flux rep- resentation of loop quantum gravity, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical45, 244004 (2012)

    2012

  46. [54]

    Kiefer, Wave packets in quantum cosmology and the cosmological constant, Nucl

    C. Kiefer, Wave packets in quantum cosmology and the cosmological constant, Nucl. Phys. B341, 273 (1990)

    1990

  47. [55]

    Corichi and E

    A. Corichi and E. Montoya, Coherent semiclassical states for loop quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D84, 044021 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    Martin-Dussaud, Searching for Coherent States: From Origins to Quantum Gravity, Quantum5, 390 (2021)

    P. Martin-Dussaud, Searching for Coherent States: From Origins to Quantum Gravity, Quantum5, 390 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    Engle and R

    J. Engle and R. Pereira, Coherent states, constraint classes and area operators in the new spin-foam models, Classical and Quantum Gravity25, 105010 (2008)

    2008

  50. [58]

    Bianchi, C

    E. Bianchi, C. Rovelli, and F. Vidotto, Towards spinfoam cosmology, Phys. Rev. D82, 084035 (2010)

    2010

  51. [59]

    Bianchi and Y

    E. Bianchi and Y. Ding, Lorentzian spinfoam propagator, Phys. Rev. D86, 104040 (2012)

    2012

  52. [60]

    D. J. Cirilo-Lombardo and N. G. Sanchez, Coherent states of quantum spacetimes for black holes and de Sit- ter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D108, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Aastrup, J

    J. Aastrup, J. M. Grimstrup, M. Paschke, and R. Nest, On semi-classical states of quantum gravity and non- commutative geometry, Communications in Mathemat- ical Physics302, 675 (2011)

    2011

  54. [62]

    M. J. Lake, M. Miller, R. F. Ganardi, Z. Liu, S.-D. Liang, and T. Paterek, Generalised uncertainty relations from superpositions of geometries, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity36, 155012 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    L. F. Abbott, Introduction to the Background Field Method, Acta Phys. Polon. B13, 33 (1982)

    1982

  56. [64]

    Kittel and P

    C. Kittel and P. McEuen,Introduction to solid state physics(John Wiley & Sons, 2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    M.-F.Li,Modern semiconductor quantum physics(World scientific, 1995)

    1995

  58. [66]

    Jaynes and F

    E. Jaynes and F. Cummings, Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser, Proceedings of the IEEE51, 89 (1963)

    1963

  59. [67]

    A. Akil, L. Giannelli, L. Modesto, O. Dahlsten, G. Chiri- bella, and C. Brukner, A quantum superposition of black hole evaporation histories: Recovering unitarity (2025), arXiv:2507.17031 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  60. [68]

    evaporate

    C. W. Misner and D. H. Sharp, Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev.136, B571 (1964). 7 END MA TTER Appendix A: Exactly Solvable Evolution for Spacetime DoF s One utility of our approach is that the dynamics of the geomet...

    1964

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.