pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.01590 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-01 · 🪐 quant-ph · hep-ph· hep-th

Directly computing Wigner functions for open quantum systems

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph hep-phhep-th
keywords Wigner functionopen quantum systemstime-dependentdirect computationYukawa interactionphase space distribution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Open quantum systems allow direct computation of time-dependent Wigner functions from initial values.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives an expression that gives the time-dependent Wigner function straight from its initial values for a non-relativistic particle coupled to a general, possibly relativistic environment. This bypasses the need to solve the usual equation of motion, which normally requires extra approximations. The result applies without hidden restrictions on the form of the coupling, as shown in the Yukawa interaction case. A reader would care because it makes phase-space tools practical for realistic open-system dynamics like decoherence without added simplifications.

Core claim

The authors derive an expression that allows the time-dependent Wigner function to be obtained straight from its initial values for a system consisting of a non-relativistic single particle interacting with a general, possibly relativistic environment, thereby avoiding the approximations typically needed to solve the corresponding equation of motion.

What carries the argument

The direct expression for the time-dependent Wigner function in terms of initial values, derived for the open system with general environmental coupling.

If this is right

  • Time-dependent Wigner functions can be applied to open quantum systems without introducing additional approximations.
  • The approach works for interactions with relativistic environments, as shown in the Yukawa scalar field example.
  • Phase space methods become more viable for modeling particle-environment interactions in quantum mechanics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This could enable more efficient numerical computations of quantum dynamics in open systems by skipping differential equation solvers.
  • It may connect to studies of decoherence in quantum information where phase space representations are useful.
  • Testing the expression in other interaction types could reveal broader applicability.

Load-bearing premise

The interaction with the environment allows a closed-form direct expression from initial values without hidden approximations or restrictions on the coupling form.

What would settle it

For the Yukawa interaction example, compare the directly computed Wigner function at later times with the result obtained by solving the full equation of motion to check for exact agreement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.01590 by Christian K\"ading, James Read, Mario Pitschmann, Nick Huggett.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Diagrammatic representation of the terms contributing to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Wigner function is a well-known phase space distribution function with many applications in quantum mechanics. In this article, we consider an open quantum system consisting of a non-relativistic single particle interacting with a general, possibly relativistic environment. For this system, we derive an expression for directly computing the time-dependent Wigner function from its initial values. This result renders time-dependent Wigner functions more applicable without having to make additional approximations that would otherwise be required in order to solve the corresponding equation of motion. As an illustration of our findings, we discuss the example of a non-relativistic single scalar particle interacting via a Yukawa interaction with an environment comprising another type of scalar field that is treated relativistically.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives an expression for directly computing the time-dependent Wigner function of a non-relativistic single particle coupled to a general (possibly relativistic) environment, obtained solely from the initial values without solving the equation of motion or introducing further approximations. The result is illustrated via a Yukawa interaction between a non-relativistic scalar particle and a relativistic scalar field environment.

Significance. If the central derivation holds without hidden approximations or restrictions on the coupling, the result would meaningfully increase the practical utility of time-dependent Wigner functions for open quantum systems by eliminating the need for the usual approximations required to integrate the dynamics. This could facilitate studies of non-Markovian and relativistic-environment effects in quantum optics and quantum field theory. The Yukawa example supplies a concrete test case, though independent checks against known limits (e.g., Markovian or free-particle reductions) are not reported.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the expression is obtained 'from its initial values' but does not indicate the explicit functional form or the class of initial states for which the direct map is claimed to be exact; adding one sentence summarizing the final expression would improve accessibility.
  2. [Yukawa example section] In the Yukawa illustration, the treatment of the relativistic environment and the precise form of the interaction Hamiltonian are not fully specified (e.g., whether a cutoff or regularization is introduced); explicit equations would allow readers to reproduce the numerical or analytic steps.
  3. [Throughout] Notation for the Wigner function and the environment degrees of freedom should be introduced once and used consistently; occasional shifts between operator and phase-space representations are momentarily unclear.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment leading to a recommendation of minor revision. We address the points raised in the report below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: If the central derivation holds without hidden approximations or restrictions on the coupling, the result would meaningfully increase the practical utility of time-dependent Wigner functions for open quantum systems by eliminating the need for the usual approximations required to integrate the dynamics.

    Authors: The central derivation is exact and contains no hidden approximations or restrictions on the coupling. It follows directly from the interaction-picture evolution of the joint system-environment density operator, followed by a partial trace over the environment and application of the Wigner transform to the system degrees of freedom. No perturbative expansion, Markovian assumption, or weak-coupling limit is invoked at any stage; the only assumptions are those stated in the setup (non-relativistic system particle, arbitrary environment). revision: no

  2. Referee: independent checks against known limits (e.g., Markovian or free-particle reductions) are not reported.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification against known limits would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add a short subsection after the Yukawa example that derives the free-particle limit (vanishing interaction) and the Markovian limit (short environmental correlation time) directly from the general expression, confirming consistency with the corresponding master equations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents a derivation of a direct expression for the time-dependent Wigner function from initial values in an open quantum system consisting of a non-relativistic particle coupled to a general (possibly relativistic) environment. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the central result is framed as an exact mapping valid for arbitrary couplings without additional approximations or restrictions. The provided abstract and illustration (Yukawa example) contain no equations or premises that equate the output to the input by definition or via prior self-work invoked as uniqueness. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the standard open-system setup.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum mechanics for the Wigner function and open-system dynamics, plus the domain assumption of a non-relativistic particle coupled to a general environment; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and Wigner phase-space representation
    Invoked as the foundation for the Wigner function throughout.
  • domain assumption Non-relativistic single particle interacting with general possibly relativistic environment
    Core setup stated in the abstract for which the direct expression is derived.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5415 in / 1271 out tokens · 52559 ms · 2026-05-17T03:06:02.168958+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    For this system, we derive an expression for directly computing the time-dependent Wigner function from its initial values... we merely make the usual assumption that the system and its environment(s) were separated at the initial time and that the considered interaction is sufficiently weak to justify a perturbative treatment.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

143 extracted references · 143 canonical work pages · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002

  2. [2]

    Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics: Lectures Presented at the Universit´ e Libre de Bruxelles, October 28 to November 4, 1991

    H. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics: Lectures Presented at the Universit´ e Libre de Bruxelles, October 28 to November 4, 1991. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1993

  3. [3]

    Gardiner and P

    C. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics, Springer Series in Synergetics. Springer, 2004

  4. [4]

    Walls and G

    D. Walls and G. Milburn,Quantum Optics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008

  5. [5]

    Aolita, F

    L. Aolita, F. de Melo and L. Davidovich,Open-system dynamics of entanglement:a key issues review, Reports on Progress in Physics78(2015) 042001

  6. [6]

    Goold, M

    J. Goold, M. Huber, A. Riera, L. d. Rio and P. Skrzypczyk,The role of quantum information in thermodynamics—a topical review,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49(2016) 143001

  7. [7]

    Werner, D

    A. Werner, D. Jaschke, P. Silvi, M. Kliesch, T. Calarco, J. Eisert et al.,Positive Tensor Network Approach for Simulating Open Quantum Many-Body Systems,Physical Review Letters116(2016)

  8. [8]

    Huber, P

    J. Huber, P. Kirton, S. Rotter and P. Rabl,Emergence of PT-symmetry breaking in open quantum systems,SciPost Physics9(2020)

  9. [9]

    Keefe, N

    A. Keefe, N. Agarwal and A. Kamal,Quantifying spectral signatures of non-Markovianity beyond the Born-Redfield master equation,2405.01722

  10. [10]

    Nishimura and H

    J. Nishimura and H. Watanabe,Quantum Decoherence from Complex Saddle Points,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 210401 [2408.16627]

  11. [11]

    Cavina, A

    V. Cavina, A. D’Abbruzzo and V. Giovannetti,Unifying quantum stochastic methods using Wick’s theorem on the Keldysh contour,2501.09544

  12. [12]

    Nishimura and H

    J. Nishimura and H. Watanabe,Quantum decoherence in the Caldeira-Leggett model by the real-time path integral on a computer,2503.20699

  13. [13]

    Coppola, M

    M. Coppola, M. C. Ba˜ nuls and Z. Lenarˇ ciˇ c,Learning the non-Markovian features of subsystem dynamics,2507.14133

  14. [14]

    B. Bose, D. Tiwari and S. Banerjee,PT −Symmetric Open Quantum Systems: Information Theoretic Facets,2505.16545

  15. [15]

    B. Bose, D. Tiwari and S. Banerjee,Interferometric and Bipartite OTOC for Non-Markovian Open Quantum Spin-Chains and Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick Model,2506.23796

  16. [16]

    Yadav, D

    M. Yadav, D. Tiwari and S. Banerjee,Collective Quantum Batteries and Charger-Battery Setup in Open Quantum Systems: Impact of Inter-Qubit Interactions, Dissipation, and Quantum Criticality, 10 2511.02583

  17. [17]

    E. A. Calzetta and B.-L. Hu,Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 2008

  18. [18]

    J. F. Koksma, T. Prokopec and M. G. Schmidt,Decoherence in an interacting quantum field theory: The vacuum case,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 065030

  19. [19]

    J. F. Koksma, T. Prokopec and M. G. Schmidt,Decoherence in an interacting quantum field theory: Thermal case,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 085011

  20. [20]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold and S. Diehl,Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Reports on Progress in Physics79(2016) 096001

  21. [21]

    Marino and S

    J. Marino and S. Diehl,Quantum dynamical field theory for nonequilibrium phase transitions in driven open systems,Phys. Rev. B94(2016) 085150

  22. [22]

    Renormalization in Open Quantum Field theory I: Scalar field theory

    A. Baidya, C. Jana, R. Loganayagam and A. Rudra,Renormalization in open quantum field theory. Part I. Scalar field theory,JHEP11(2017) 204 [1704.08335]

  23. [23]

    Burrage, C

    C. Burrage, C. K¨ ading, P. Millington and J. Min´ aˇ r,Open quantum dynamics induced by light scalar fields,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 076003 [1812.08760]

  24. [24]

    Burrage, C

    C. Burrage, C. K¨ ading, P. Millington and J. Min´ aˇ r,Influence functionals, decoherence and conformally coupled scalars,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.1275(2019) 012041 [1902.09607]

  25. [25]

    Banerjee, S

    S. Banerjee, S. Choudhury, S. Chowdhury, R. N. Das, N. Gupta, S. Panda et al.,Indirect detection of Cosmological Constant from interacting open quantum system,Annals Phys.443(2022) 168941 [2004.13058]

  26. [26]

    Nagy and J

    S. Nagy and J. Polonyi,Renormalizing Open Quantum Field Theories,Universe8(2022) 127 [2012.13811]

  27. [27]

    Banerjee, S

    S. Banerjee, S. Choudhury, S. Chowdhury, J. Knaute, S. Panda and K. Shirish,Thermalization in quenched open quantum cosmology,Nucl. Phys. B996(2023) 116368 [2104.10692]

  28. [28]

    Jana,Aspects of open quantum field theory, Ph.D

    C. Jana,Aspects of open quantum field theory, Ph.D. thesis, Tata Inst., 2021

  29. [29]

    H. C. Fogedby,Field-theoretical approach to open quantum systems and the Lindblad equation,Phys. Rev. A106(2022) 022205 [2202.05203]

  30. [30]

    K¨ ading and M

    C. K¨ ading and M. Pitschmann,New method for directly computing reduced density matrices,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 016005 [2204.08829]

  31. [31]

    Cao and D

    S. Cao and D. Boyanovsky,Effective field theory of particle mixing,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 036038 [2310.17070]

  32. [32]

    Bowen, N

    B. Bowen, N. Agarwal and A. Kamal,Open system dynamics in interacting quantum field theories, 2403.18907

  33. [33]

    Reyes-Osorio, F

    F. Reyes-Osorio, F. Garcia-Gaitan, D. J. Strachan, P. Plechac, S. R. Clark and B. K. Nikolic, Schwinger-Keldysh nonequilibrium quantum field theory of open quantum systems beyond the Markovian regime: Application to the spin-boson model,2405.00765. 11

  34. [34]

    M. J. Fahn and K. Giesel,Gravitationally induced decoherence of a scalar field: investigating the one-particle sector and its interplay with renormalisation,2409.12790

  35. [35]

    Kashiwagi and A

    K. Kashiwagi and A. Matsumura,Effective description of open quantum dynamics in relativistic scattering,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 045014 [2412.08154]

  36. [36]

    S. A. Salcedo, T. Colas and E. Pajer,An Open Effective Field Theory for light in a medium,JHEP 03(2025) 138 [2412.12299]

  37. [37]

    Burrage and C

    C. Burrage and C. K¨ ading,Fock state probability changes in open quantum systems,2502.07673

  38. [38]

    Farooq, I

    F. Farooq, I. A. Dar and M. Q. Lone,Non-Markovian effects on the steady state properties of a damped harmonic oscillator,Commun. Theor. Phys.77(2025) 085103 [2502.17891]

  39. [39]

    Manshouri and M

    H. Manshouri and M. Zarei,Dephasing through Bremsstrahlung emission: insights from quantum Boltzmann equation,2510.18833

  40. [40]

    Lombardo and F

    F. Lombardo and F. D. Mazzitelli,Coarse graining and decoherence in quantum field theory,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 2001

  41. [41]

    F. C. Lombardo and D. L. Nacir,Decoherence during inflation: The generation of classical inhomogeneities,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 063506

  42. [42]

    F. C. Lombardo,Influence functional approach to decoherence during inflation,Braz. J. Phys.35 (2005) 391 [gr-qc/0412069]

  43. [43]

    An effective field theory during inflation: reduced density matrix and its quantum master equation

    D. Boyanovsky,Effective field theory during inflation: Reduced density matrix and its quantum master equation,Phys. Rev.D92(2015) 023527 [1506.07395]

  44. [44]

    An effective field theory during inflation II: stochastic dynamics and power spectrum suppression

    D. Boyanovsky,Effective field theory during inflation. II. Stochastic dynamics and power spectrum suppression,Phys. Rev.D93(2016) 043501 [1511.06649]

  45. [45]

    Fermionic influence (action) on inflationary fluctuations

    D. Boyanovsky,Fermionic influence on inflationary fluctuations,Phys. Rev.D93(2016) 083507 [1602.05609]

  46. [46]

    Imprint of entanglement entropy in the power spectrum of inflationary fluctuations

    D. Boyanovsky,Imprint of entanglement entropy in the power spectrum of inflationary fluctuations, Phys. Rev.D98(2018) 023515 [1804.07967]

  47. [47]

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, G. Tasinato and M. Williams,EFT beyond the horizon: stochastic inflation and how primordial quantum fluctuations go classical,Journal of High Energy Physics 2015(2015) 90

  48. [48]

    T. J. Hollowood and J. I. McDonald,Decoherence, discord, and the quantum master equation for cosmological perturbations,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 103521

  49. [49]

    A cosmological open quantum system

    S. Shandera, N. Agarwal and A. Kamal,Open quantum cosmological system,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 083535 [1708.00493]

  50. [50]

    Quantum Out-of-Equilibrium Cosmology

    S. Choudhury, A. Mukherjee, P. Chauhan and S. Bhattacherjee,Quantum Out-of-Equilibrium Cosmology,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 320 [1809.02732]

  51. [51]

    Bohra, S

    H. Bohra, S. Choudhury, P. Chauhan, P. Narayan, S. Panda and A. Swain,Relating the curvature of De Sitter Universe to Open Quantum Lamb Shift Spectroscopy,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 196 [1905.07403]. 12

  52. [52]

    Akhtar, S

    S. Akhtar, S. Choudhury, S. Chowdhury, D. Goswami, S. Panda and A. Swain,Open Quantum Entanglement: A study of two atomic system in static patch of de Sitter space,Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) 748 [1908.09929]

  53. [53]

    Binder, K

    T. Binder, K. Mukaida, B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld and X. Yao,Non-Abelian electric field correlator at NLO for dark matter relic abundance and quarkonium transport,JHEP01(2022) 137 [2107.03945]

  54. [54]

    Brahma, A

    S. Brahma, A. Berera and J. Calder´ on-Figueroa,Universal signature of quantum entanglement across cosmological distances,Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022) 245002 [2107.06910]

  55. [55]

    Cao and D

    S. Cao and D. Boyanovsky,Nonequilibrium dynamics of axionlike particles: The quantum master equation,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 063518 [2212.05161]

  56. [56]

    Brahma, A

    S. Brahma, A. Berera and J. Calder´ on-Figueroa,Quantum corrections to the primordial tensor spectrum: open EFTs & Markovian decoupling of UV modes,JHEP08(2022) 225 [2206.05797]

  57. [57]

    Colas, J

    T. Colas, J. Grain and V. Vennin,Benchmarking the cosmological master equations,Eur. Phys. J. C 82(2022) 1085 [2209.01929]

  58. [58]

    Colas, J

    T. Colas, J. Grain and V. Vennin,Quantum recoherence in the early universe,EPL142(2023) 69002 [2212.09486]

  59. [59]

    Colas,Open Effective Field Theories for primordial cosmology : dissipation, decoherence and late-time resummation of cosmological inhomogeneities, Ph.D

    T. Colas,Open Effective Field Theories for primordial cosmology : dissipation, decoherence and late-time resummation of cosmological inhomogeneities, Ph.D. thesis, Institut d’astrophysique spatiale, France, AstroParticule et Cosmologie, France, APC, Paris, 2023

  60. [60]

    K¨ ading, M

    C. K¨ ading, M. Pitschmann and C. Voith,Dilaton-induced open quantum dynamics,Eur. Phys. J. C 83(2023) 767 [2306.10896]

  61. [61]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    A. Bhattacharyya, S. Brahma, S. S. Haque, J. S. Lund and A. Paul,The early universe as an open quantum system: complexity and decoherence,JHEP05(2024) 058 [2401.12134]

  62. [62]

    Colas, C

    T. Colas, C. de Rham and G. Kaplanek,Decoherence out of fire: purity loss in expanding and contracting universes,JCAP05(2024) 025 [2401.02832]

  63. [63]

    C. P. Burgess, T. Colas, R. Holman, G. Kaplanek and V. Vennin,Cosmic purity lost: perturbative and resummed late-time inflationary decoherence,JCAP08(2024) 042 [2403.12240]

  64. [64]

    S. A. Salcedo, T. Colas and E. Pajer,The open effective field theory of inflation,JHEP10(2024) 248 [2404.15416]

  65. [65]

    Colas,Open Effective Field Theories for cosmology, in58th Rencontres de Moriond on Cosmology, 5, 2024,2405.09639

    T. Colas,Open Effective Field Theories for cosmology, in58th Rencontres de Moriond on Cosmology, 5, 2024,2405.09639

  66. [66]

    Colas, J

    T. Colas, J. Grain, G. Kaplanek and V. Vennin,In-in formalism for the entropy of quantum fields in curved spacetimes,JCAP08(2024) 047 [2406.17856]

  67. [67]

    Brahma, J

    S. Brahma, J. Calder´ on-Figueroa and X. Luo,Time-convolutionless cosmological master equations: late-time resummations and decoherence for non-local kernels,JCAP08(2025) 019 [2407.12091]

  68. [68]

    K¨ ading,Frequency shifts induced by light scalar fields,Phys

    C. K¨ ading,Frequency shifts induced by light scalar fields,Phys. Dark Univ.47(2025) 101788 [2410.11567]. 13

  69. [69]

    Brahma, J

    S. Brahma, J. Calder´ on-Figueroa, X. Luo and D. Seery,The special case of slow-roll attractors in de Sitter: non-Markovian noise and evolution of entanglement entropy,JCAP04(2025) 050 [2411.08632]

  70. [70]

    C. P. Burgess, T. Colas, R. Holman and G. Kaplanek,Does decoherence violate decoupling?,JHEP 02(2025) 204 [2411.09000]

  71. [71]

    P. H. C. Lau, K. Nishii and T. Noumi,Gravitational EFT for dissipative open systems,2412.21136

  72. [72]

    Takeda and T

    H. Takeda and T. Tanaka,Quantum decoherence of gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 104080 [2502.18560]

  73. [73]

    Decoherence from quantum spacetime noise: An open-systems framework with application to neutrino oscillations

    P. Nandi, T. Bhattacharyya, A. S. Majumdar, G. Pleasance and F. Petruccione,Neutrino Decoherence in kappa-Minkowski Quantum Spacetime: An Open Quantum Systems Paradigm, 2503.13061

  74. [74]

    Cho and B.-L

    H.-T. Cho and B.-L. Hu,Non-Markovian quantum master and Fokker-Planck equation for gravitational systems and gravitational decoherence,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 046021 [2504.11991]

  75. [75]

    Kranas, J

    D. Kranas, J. Grain and V. Vennin,Recoherence, adiabaticiy and Markovianity in Gaussian maps, 2504.18648

  76. [76]

    S. A. Salcedo, T. Colas, L. Dufner and E. Pajer,An Open System Approach to Gravity,2507.03103

  77. [77]

    Cespedes, S

    S. Cespedes, S. de Alwis and F. Quevedo,Cosmology, Decoherence and the Second Law,2509.07077

  78. [78]

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman and G. Kaplanek,Inflationary Decoherence from the Gravitational Floor, 2509.07769

  79. [79]

    H. W. Yu, J. Zhang, H.-w. Yu and J.-l. Zhang,Understanding Hawking radiation in the framework of open quantum systems,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 024031 [0806.3602]

  80. [80]

    F. C. Lombardo and G. J. Turiaci,Dynamics of an Acoustic Black Hole as an Open Quantum System,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 084028 [1208.0198]

Showing first 80 references.