pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2512.01746 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-01 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· math-ph· math.MP

Towards a complete description of multiple Dp-brane systems: Multiple D0 Story

Unai D.M. Sarraga This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP
keywords multiple D0-branessupersymmetric actionmoving frame formalismnonlinear dynamicskappa-symmetryD-branesstring theoryM-theory
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

A nonlinear action for nearly coincident multiple D0-branes is invariant under both spacetime supersymmetry and worldline supersymmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs a complete supersymmetric description of systems of nearly coincident Dirichlet p-branes, centering on the D0 case. It delivers a fully nonlinear 10-dimensional action for multiple D0-branes that respects both target-space supersymmetry and an additional worldline supersymmetry. A sympathetic reader would care because single D-branes are well understood while coincident ones relate to nonabelian dynamics and the deeper structure of string theory. The work also begins a quantization program that would produce a field theory on a superspace extended by matrix coordinates.

Core claim

The paper establishes a completely nonlinear action for the 10-dimensional dynamical system of nearly coincident multiple D0-branes which is doubly supersymmetric, meaning it is invariant under both spacetime supersymmetry in target superspace and the worldline supersymmetry that is the counterpart of the local fermionic kappa-symmetry of a single D0-brane. The construction is carried out in flat superspace with the spinor moving frame formalism.

What carries the argument

The spinor moving frame formalism in flat superspace, which supplies a geometric framework for supersymmetric particles and extended objects by introducing appropriate moving frames with spinor components.

If this is right

  • The action provides the starting point for quantizing the multiple D0-brane system.
  • Full quantization produces a supersymmetric field theory on a superspace extended by additional bosonic and fermionic matrix coordinates.
  • Development of this field theory may offer insights into the deeper structure of String/M-theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same moving-frame approach could be extended to multiple Dp-branes for p greater than zero to obtain a uniform description across different dimensions.
  • The matrix coordinates appearing after quantization suggest a direct link to nonabelian gauge theory structures that arise from D-brane dynamics.
  • Taking the limit in which the branes separate should recover multiple independent copies of the single D0 action, serving as an internal consistency test.

Load-bearing premise

The moving frame formalism in flat superspace suffices to capture the full supersymmetric dynamics of multiple D0-branes without curvature terms or higher-order corrections.

What would settle it

An explicit verification that the proposed action is not invariant under the expected supersymmetry transformations or that it fails to reduce to the known single D0-brane action when the number of branes is set to one.

read the original abstract

In this thesis, we address the problem of constructing the complete supersymmetric description of systems of $N$ nearly coincident Dirichlet $p$-branes (multiple D$p$-brane or mD$p$). A particularly important result is a completely nonlinear action for the 10-dimensional dynamical system of nearly coincident multiple D$0$-branes (mD$0$) which is doubly supersymmetric, i.e. it is invariant under both spacetime (target superspace) supersymmetry and the worldline supersymmetry; the latter is a counterpart of the local fermionic $\kappa$-symmetry characteristic of a single D$0$-brane (Dirichlet superparticle). This problem is approached in flat superspace using the (spinor) moving frame formalism, which provides us with a geometric framework to the treatment of supersymmetric particles and extended objects ($p$-branes) in higher dimensions. Furthermore, we have initiated the quantization program aimed at development of a field theory of multiple D$0$-branes. This quantization in its complete form is expected to lead to a novel supersymmetric field theory formulated on a superspace extended by additional bosonic and fermionic matrix coordinates, whose development may offer significant insights into the deeper structure of String/M-theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The thesis constructs a completely nonlinear action for the 10D dynamical system of nearly coincident multiple D0-branes (mD0) that is doubly supersymmetric—invariant under both target-space supersymmetry in flat superspace and worldline supersymmetry—using the spinor moving frame formalism. It further initiates a quantization program toward a novel supersymmetric field theory on a superspace extended by matrix bosonic and fermionic coordinates.

Significance. If the construction rigorously establishes the claimed invariance and nonlinearity without additional assumptions, the result would advance the geometric treatment of non-abelian D-brane dynamics and offer potential insights into the structure of string/M-theory via the quantization step.

major comments (2)
  1. [Main construction of the mD0 action] The central construction assumes that the single-brane spinor moving frame geometry in flat superspace extends directly to the matrix-valued multiple D0 case while generating all interaction terms and closing both supersymmetries. This extension must be shown explicitly to avoid missing non-abelian or higher-order corrections.
  2. [Symmetry invariance and action derivation] The abstract asserts complete nonlinearity and double supersymmetry, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit equations, variation calculations, or consistency checks demonstrating closure of the worldline supersymmetry for the matrix coordinates.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including at least one key equation or the explicit form of the action to allow immediate assessment of the claimed properties.
  2. [Quantization section] Clarify the precise steps of the quantization program and how the extended superspace with matrix coordinates is defined.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity and explicitness of the derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Main construction of the mD0 action] The central construction assumes that the single-brane spinor moving frame geometry in flat superspace extends directly to the matrix-valued multiple D0 case while generating all interaction terms and closing both supersymmetries. This extension must be shown explicitly to avoid missing non-abelian or higher-order corrections.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit step-by-step demonstration strengthens the presentation. The construction proceeds by promoting the single-brane spinor moving frame variables to matrix-valued quantities in flat superspace; the non-abelian interactions arise directly from the matrix commutators appearing in the Maurer-Cartan forms and the resulting action. No additional assumptions are introduced, and the closure of both supersymmetries follows from the geometric properties of the moving frame. To address the concern, we will insert a dedicated subsection with the intermediate steps of the matrix generalization and the explicit generation of interaction terms in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Symmetry invariance and action derivation] The abstract asserts complete nonlinearity and double supersymmetry, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit equations, variation calculations, or consistency checks demonstrating closure of the worldline supersymmetry for the matrix coordinates.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the present version does not contain the full expanded variation of the action under worldline supersymmetry. Target-space supersymmetry invariance is ensured by the geometric construction in flat superspace. Worldline supersymmetry closure has been verified on the equations of motion, but a direct computation of the action variation for the matrix coordinates is indeed omitted. We will add the explicit variation calculations and the resulting consistency checks in the revised manuscript to make the double supersymmetry fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: construction of doubly supersymmetric mD0 action via moving-frame formalism is self-contained

full rationale

The paper presents an explicit construction of a nonlinear action for multiple D0-branes that is invariant under both target-space and worldline supersymmetry, carried out in flat 10D superspace with the spinor moving-frame formalism. No equations or steps in the provided abstract or description reduce a claimed prediction or result to a fitted input, self-definition, or unverified self-citation chain by construction. The moving-frame approach is invoked as an established geometric framework rather than as a load-bearing uniqueness theorem imported from the same authors' prior work that forces the outcome. The derivation therefore remains independent and falsifiable via direct verification of the supersymmetry closures and nonlinearity of the resulting action.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumptions of supersymmetric string theory in flat space together with the moving frame formalism; no new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are stated in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Flat superspace provides an adequate background for the supersymmetric dynamics of multiple D0-branes
    Invoked when the construction is restricted to flat superspace
  • standard math The spinor moving frame formalism correctly encodes the geometry of supersymmetric extended objects
    Used as the geometric framework for the treatment of p-branes

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5530 in / 1479 out tokens · 51687 ms · 2026-05-17T03:04:44.946868+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

193 extracted references · 193 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Bandos, U

    I. Bandos, U. D. M. Sarraga. 3D supersymmetric nonlinear multiple D0-brane action and 4D counterpart of multiple M-wave system.JHEP, 03 122, 2022.Journal of High Energy Physics

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Bandos, U

    I. Bandos, U. D. M. Sarraga. Complete nonlinear action for a supersymmetric multiple D0-brane system.Phys. Rev. D, 106 6 N6, 2022.Physics Review D

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Bandos, U

    I. Bandos, U. D. M. Sarraga. Properties of multiple D0-brane systems: 11D origin, equa- tions of motion, and their solutions .Phys. Rev. D, 107 8 086006, 2023.Physics Review D

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Bandos, U

    I. Bandos, U. D. M. Sarraga. Towards field theory of multiple D0-branes. Hamiltonian mechanics and quantization of simplest 3D prototype of multiple D0-brane system . JHEP, 10 020, 2024.Journal of High Energy Physics. Basic References

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Asimov.A Short History of Chemistry - An Introduction to the Ideas and Concepts of Chemistry

    I. Asimov.A Short History of Chemistry - An Introduction to the Ideas and Concepts of Chemistry. 580, Doubleday & Co. , 1965

    work page 1965

  6. [6]

    H. H. Joachim.Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, pages 512-554. Princeton Uni- versity Press, Princeton, 1985

    work page 1985

  7. [7]

    H. G. Liddell, R. Scott, H. S. Jones, R. McKenzie.A Greek-English lexicon. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1940

    work page 1940

  8. [8]

    Bernabé.Fragmentos presocráticos: de Tales a Demócrito., Alianza, 2008

    A. Bernabé.Fragmentos presocráticos: de Tales a Demócrito., Alianza, 2008

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    A. G. van Melse, H. J. Koren.From Atomos to Atom: The History of the Concept Atom. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4 (15):252-254, Taylor & Francis, 1953

    work page 1953

  10. [10]

    Rutherford

    E. Rutherford. The scattering of alpha and beta particles by matter and the structure of the atom.Philosophical Magazine, 92(4):379-398, 1911

    work page 1911

  11. [11]

    Rutherford

    E. Rutherford. Collision of  particles with light atoms. IV. An anomalous effect in ni- trogen.The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 37(222):581-587, 1919

    work page 1919

  12. [12]

    Chadwick

    J. Chadwick. The Existence of a Neutron.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 136(830):692-708, 1932

    work page 1932

  13. [13]

    E. D. Bloom et al. High-Energy Inelastic e p Scattering at 6-Degrees and 10-Degrees , Phys. Rev. Lett.23:930-934, Oct 1969.Physical Review Letters

    work page 1969

  14. [14]

    Breidenbach et al

    M. Breidenbach et al. Observed behavior of highly inelastic electron-proton scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.23:935-939, Oct 1969.Physical Review Letters

    work page 1969

  15. [15]

    M. D. Schwartz. Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model.Cambridge University Press, 2014

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    Weinberg

    S. Weinberg. The quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations .Cambridge University Press, 1995

    work page 1995

  17. [17]

    T. P. Cheng, L. F. Li. Gauge Theory of elementary particle physics .Oxford University Press, 1984

    work page 1984

  18. [18]

    J. C. Pati, A. Salam. Unified Lepton-Hadron Symmetry and a Gauge Theory of the Basic Interactions,Phys. Rev. D8:1240-1251, 1973.Physical Review D. 187

    work page 1973

  19. [19]

    Georgi, S

    H. Georgi, S. L. Glashow. Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces.Phys. Rev. Lett.32:438- 441, 1974.Physical Review Letters

    work page 1974

  20. [20]

    S. L. Glashow. Partial-symmetries of weak interactions .Nucl.Phys., 22:579-588, 1961. Nuclear Physics

    work page 1961

  21. [21]

    Weinberg

    S. Weinberg. A Model of Leptons .Phys.Rev.Lett., 19:1264-1266, 1967.Physical Review Letters

    work page 1967

  22. [22]

    A. Salam. Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions .Conf.Proc., C680519:367-377, 1968. World Scientic Series

    work page 1968

  23. [23]

    P. W. Higgs. Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons .Phys.Rev.Lett., 13:508-509, 1964.Physical Review Letters

    work page 1964

  24. [24]

    F. Englert. Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons .Phys.Rev.Lett., 13:321-323, 1964.Physical Review Letters

    work page 1964

  25. [25]

    G. S. Guralnik, C.R. Hagen, T. W. B. Kibble. Global Conservation Laws and Massless Par- ticles.Phys.Rev.Lett., 13:585-587, 1964.Physical Review Letters

    work page 1964

  26. [26]

    T. W. B. Kibble. Symmetry breaking in nonAbelian gauge theories.Phys.Rev., 155:1554- 1561, 1967.Physical Review

    work page 1967

  27. [27]

    Nishijima

    K. Nishijima. Charge Independence Theory of V Particles .Prog.Theor.Phys, 13(3):285- 304, 03, 1955.Progress of Theoretical Physics

    work page 1955

  28. [28]

    Gell-Mann

    M. Gell-Mann. The interpretation of the new particles as displaced charge multiplets . Nuovo Cim., 4(S2):848-866, 1956.Nuovo Cimento

    work page 1956

  29. [29]

    A. V. Smilga. Lectures on quantum chromodynamics.World Scientic, 2001.World Sci- entic Series

    work page 2001

  30. [30]

    I. Newton. Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica.Royal Society of London, 1687

    work page

  31. [31]

    J. C. Maxwell. Dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field .Philosophical Transac- tions of the Royal Society of London, 155:459-512, 1865.The Royal Society

    work page

  32. [32]

    Gergi, S

    H. Gergi, S. L. Glashow. Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces .Phys.Rev.Lett., 32:438- 441, 1974.Physical Review Letters

    work page 1974

  33. [33]

    Fritzsch, P

    H. Fritzsch, P. Minkowski. Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons .Annals Phys, 93:193-266, 1975.Annals of Physics. 188

    work page 1975

  34. [34]

    Zwiebach

    B. Zwiebach. A first course in string theory..Cambridge University Press, 7, 2006

    work page 2006

  35. [35]

    Quantum Gravity and the Big Bang

    M. Bojowald. Quantum gravity and the big bang .arXiv astro-ph/0309478, 2003. arXiv:0309478

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  36. [36]

    Alesci, S

    E. Alesci, S. Bahrami, D. Pranzetti. Quantum gravity predictions for black hole interior geometry.Phys. Lett. B, 797, 2019.Physics Letters B

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Becker, M

    K. Becker, M. Becker, J. H. Schwarz. String theory and M-theory: A modern introduction. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2006

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    P. A. M. Dirac. An Extensible model of the electron .Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 268:57-67, 1962.Proceedings of the The Royal Society A

    work page 1962

  39. [39]

    Kiritsis

    E. Kiritsis. String theory in a nutshell.Princeton University Press, USA, 2019

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    G. Zweig. An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking, 1964.CERN Document Server

    work page 1964

  41. [41]

    Veneziano

    G. Veneziano. An Introduction to Dual Models of Strong Interactions and Their Physical Motivations.Phys. Rept., 9:199-242, 1974.Physics Reports

    work page 1974

  42. [42]

    J. H. Schwarz. The Early Years of String Theory: A Personal Perspective arXiv hep- th/0708.1917, 2007.arXiv:0708.1917

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1917

  43. [43]

    Y. A. Golfand, E. P. Likhtman. Extension of the Algebra of Poincare Group Generators and Violation of p Invariance.JETP Lett., 13:323-326, 1971.JETP Letters

    work page 1971

  44. [44]

    J. L. Gervais, B. Sakita. Field Theory Interpretation of Supergauges in Dual Models.Nucl. Phys. B, 34:632-639, 1971.Nuclear Physics B

    work page 1971

  45. [45]

    P. Ramond. Dual Theory for Free Fermions.Phys. Rev. D, 3 2415-2418, 1971.Physics Re- view D

    work page 1971

  46. [46]

    Neveu, J

    A. Neveu, J. H. Schwarz. Tachyon-free dual model with a positive-intercept trajectory . Phys. Lett. B, 34:517-518, 1971.Physics Letters B

    work page 1971

  47. [47]

    D. V. Volkov, V. P. Akulov. Possible universal neutrino interaction.JETP Lett, 16:438-440, 1972.JETP Letters

    work page 1972

  48. [48]

    D. V. Volkov, V. P. Akulov. Is the Neutrino a Goldstone Particle?.Phys. Lett. B, 46:109-110, 1973.Physics Letters B

    work page 1973

  49. [49]

    J. Wess, B. Zumino. A Lagrangian Model Invariant Under Supergauge Transformations. Phys. Lett. B, 49:52-54, 1974.Physics Letters B. 189

    work page 1974

  50. [50]

    Drees, R

    M. Drees, R. Godbole, P. Roy. Theory and Phenomenology of Sparticles.World Scientic, 2005

    work page 2005

  51. [51]

    Rickles.A Brief History of String Theory: From Dual Models to M-Theory

    D. Rickles.A Brief History of String Theory: From Dual Models to M-Theory. Springer, 2014

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    C. V. Johnson.D-branes. Cambridge University Press, 2006

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz. Supersymmetrical String Theories.Phys. Lett. B, 149:117-122, 1984.Physics Letters B

    work page 1984

  54. [54]

    Alvarez-Gaume, P

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, P. H. Ginsparg, G. W. Moore, C. Vafa. An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String. Phys. Lett. B, 171:155-1162, 1986.Physics Letters B

    work page 1986

  55. [55]

    Blaszczyk et al

    M. Blaszczyk et al. Non-supersymmetric heterotic model building .JHEP, 10 119, 2014. Journal of High Energy Physics

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    D. J. Gross, J. A. Harvey, R. Martinec, R. Rohm. Heterotic String Theory I. The Free Het- erotic String.Nucl. Phys. B, 256:253-284, 1985.Nuclear Physics B

    work page 1985

  57. [57]

    D. J. Gross, J. A. Harvey, R. Martinec, R. Rohm. Heterotic String Theory II. The Interacting Heterotic String.Nucl. Phys. B, 267:75-124, 1986.Nuclear Physics B

    work page 1986

  58. [58]

    E. Witten. String theory dynamics in various dimensionsNucl. Phys. B, 443:85-126, 1995. Nuclear Physics B

    work page 1995

  59. [59]

    Polchinski

    J. Polchinski. Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond charges .Phys.Rev.Lett., 75:4724- 4727, 1995.Physical Review Letters

    work page 1995

  60. [60]

    Sagnotti

    A. Sagnotti. Open Strings and their Symmetry Groups .NATO Advanced Summer In- stitute on Nonperturbative Quantum Field Theory (Cargese Summer Institute), 1987. arXiv:0208020

    work page 1987

  61. [61]

    J. Dai, R. G. Leigh, J. Polchinski. New Connections Between String Theories . Mod.Phys.Lett.A, 4:2073-2083, 1989.Modern Physics Letters A

    work page 2073

  62. [62]

    P. Horava. Background Duality of Open String Models .Phys. Lett. B, 231:251-257, 1989. Physics Letters B

    work page 1989

  63. [63]

    Maldacena

    J. Maldacena. The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity . Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2:231-252, 1998.Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. 190

    work page 1998

  64. [64]

    T. Kaluza. Zum Unitätsproblem der Physik .Math. Phys., 966-972, 1921.International Journal of Modern Physics D

    work page 1921

  65. [65]

    Perez-Lorenzana

    A. Perez-Lorenzana. An Introduction to extra dimensions.J. Phys. Conf. Ser, 18:224-269, 2005.Journal of Physics: Conference Series

    work page 2005

  66. [66]

    M. Graña. Flux compactifications in string theory: A Comprehensive review.Phys. Rept, 423:91-158, 2006.Physics Reports

    work page 2006

  67. [67]

    Ooguri, C

    H. Ooguri, C. Vafa. On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland.Nucl. Phys. B, 766:21-33, 2007.Nuclear Physics B

    work page 2007

  68. [68]

    C. Vafa. The String landscape and the swampland .arXiv hep-th/0509212, 2005. arXiv:0509212

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  69. [69]

    T. Regge. On the Properties of spin-2 particles .Nuovo Cim., 5:325-336, 1957.Nuovo Ci- mento

    work page 1957

  70. [70]

    S. Mukhi. String theory: a perspective over the last 25 years .Class. Quant. Grav., 28:153001, 2011.Classical and Quantum Gravity

    work page 2011

  71. [71]

    D. Tong. String Theory. 2009.arXiv:0908.0333

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  72. [72]

    Ortin.Gravity and Strings

    T. Ortin.Gravity and Strings. Cambridge University Press, 2015

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    L. E. Ibañez, A. Uranga.String theory and particle physics: An introduction to string phenomenology. Cambridge University Press, 2012

    work page 2012

  74. [74]

    J. H. Field. Space-time exchange invariance: Special relativity as a symmetry principle . American Jou. Phys., 69(5):569–575, 2001.American Journal of Physics

    work page 2001

  75. [75]

    Einstein

    A. Einstein. Zur elektrodynamik bewegter körper.Annalen Phys., 322(10):891-921, 1905. Annalen der Physik

    work page 1905

  76. [76]

    Deser, B

    S. Deser, B. Zumino. A Complete Action for the Spinning String.Phys. Lett. B, 65:369-373, 1976.Physics Letters B

    work page 1976

  77. [77]

    Brink, P

    L. Brink, P. Di Vecchia, P. S. Howe. A Locally Supersymmetric and Reparametrization Invariant Action for the Spinning String.Phys. Lett. B, 65:471-474, 1976.Physics Letters B

    work page 1976

  78. [78]

    A. M. Polyakov. Quantum Geometry of Bosonic Strings.Phys. Lett. B, 103:598-601, 1981. Physics Letters B. 191

    work page 1981

  79. [79]

    Van Nieuwenhuizen

    P. Van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergravity.Phys. Rept., 68:189-398, 1981.Physics Reports

    work page 1981

  80. [80]

    S. J. Gates, M. T. Grisaru, M. Rocek, W. Siegel. Superspace Or One Thousand and One Lessons in Supersymmetry.Front. Phys., 58:1-548, 1983.Frontiers in Physics

    work page 1983

Showing first 80 references.