pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.02791 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-02 · 💻 cs.CL

Making Dialogue Grounding Data Rich: A Three-Tier Data Synthesis Framework for Generalized Referring Expression Comprehension

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 02:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords dialogue groundingreferring expression comprehensiondata synthesiscoreference resolutiondistribution shiftmultimodal learninggeneralized referring expressions
0
0 comments X

The pith

A three-tier data synthesis framework generates scalable dialogue grounding data that improves model performance on generalized referring expression comprehension under distribution shifts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper addresses the scarcity of annotated dialogue data for Generalized Referring Expression Comprehension, where models must ground expressions to multiple possible targets in images while tracking coreferences over conversation history. Existing approaches suffer when test dialogues differ from training ones. To fix this, the authors develop a three-tier synthesis process that mixes controllable generation steps with realism-preserving elements to create large volumes of training examples. Fine-tuning models on the resulting data produces steady gains on standard benchmarks for grounding accuracy and coreference handling.

Core claim

Dialogue-Based Generalized Referring Expression Comprehension requires models to ground expressions and unlimited targets in complex visual scenes while resolving coreference across long dialogue contexts. Existing systems struggle under distribution shift between training and evaluation domains because of scarce annotated dialogue grounding data. A three-tier data-synthesis method balances realism and controllability to produce scalable supervision for dialogue-conditioned grounding. Fine-tuning on the synthesized data yields consistent, substantial improvements over prior approaches across standard evaluation metrics.

What carries the argument

Three-tier data-synthesis framework that produces large-scale annotated examples for dialogue-conditioned visual grounding by balancing realism and controllability.

If this is right

  • Models gain robustness to domain shifts without requiring new human annotations for each target domain.
  • Performance rises on tasks that demand tracking referents across multiple dialogue turns.
  • Training becomes feasible for scenes containing many possible targets rather than single unique objects.
  • The same synthesis pipeline can support larger-scale experiments on longer or more complex dialogues.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same tiered synthesis approach could be tested on related tasks such as visual question answering over dialogue history.
  • If the generated dialogues contain detectable artifacts, downstream applications may need additional filtering steps before deployment.
  • Extending the framework to generate data for entirely new visual domains would test whether the improvements generalize beyond current benchmarks.
  • Combining the synthesized data with small amounts of real human dialogue might yield further gains while keeping annotation costs low.

Load-bearing premise

The three-tier synthesis process produces data whose distribution is close enough to real human dialogues that improvements on held-out test sets will transfer to genuinely unseen dialogue domains.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment showing no gains or degraded performance when models fine-tuned on the synthesized data are evaluated on dialogues drawn from a new domain with different conversational styles or visual setups would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.02791 by Chris Madge, Juexi Shao, Massimo Poesio, Siyou Li, Vanja Karan, Yujian Gan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Multimodal Data Synthesis As the data requirements of large-scale pre-training have grown, synthetic data has emerged as a prominent paradigm. A broad class of methods [9, 10, 19] relies on simulators to produce data with controllable distributions and programmatically generated annotations [11, 20, 21], whereas recent approaches leverage generative models to synthesize diverse textual [12, 13] and multimo… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dialogue-Based Generalized Referring Expression Comprehension (GREC) requires models to ground the expression and unlimited targets in complex visual scenes while resolving coreference across a long dialogue context. However, existing systems struggle under distribution shift between training and evaluation domains, a gap exacerbated by the scarcity of annotated dialogue grounding data. We address this challenge with a three-tier data-synthesis method that balances realism and controllability to produce scalable supervision for dialogue-conditioned grounding. Fine-tuning on the synthesized data yields consistent, substantial improvements over prior approaches across standard evaluation metrics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a three-tier data synthesis framework for generating scalable dialogue grounding data to support Dialogue-Based Generalized Referring Expression Comprehension (GREC). The approach aims to balance realism and controllability in synthetic data creation to mitigate scarcity of annotated data and distribution shift issues between training and evaluation domains. The central claim is that fine-tuning models on this synthesized data produces consistent, substantial improvements over prior methods on standard evaluation metrics for grounding expressions and resolving coreference in complex visual scenes with long dialogue contexts.

Significance. If the empirical gains hold under proper validation, the work would offer a practical, scalable method for augmenting limited dialogue grounding datasets, potentially improving model robustness in multi-turn visual grounding tasks. This could address a key bottleneck in dialogue-conditioned comprehension systems, though its impact depends on demonstrating that synthetic data generalizes beyond the generation process itself.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3: The three-tier synthesis process is described as balancing realism and controllability, but the manuscript provides no direct quantitative assessment (e.g., KL divergence, human-likeness ratings, or coreference pattern statistics) comparing the synthetic distribution to real human dialogues from disjoint corpora. This measurement is load-bearing for the claim that observed metric gains reflect genuine robustness rather than synthesis artifacts.
  2. [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4: The assertion of 'consistent, substantial improvements' is stated without accompanying quantitative results, ablation studies on individual tiers, or details on evaluation metrics and baselines in the provided summary sections. This absence prevents verification that the central empirical claim is supported by the data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for coreference chains and target grounding could be clarified with an example dialogue in §2 to aid readability.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for any synthesis pipeline diagrams should explicitly label the three tiers and their outputs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our work. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating planned revisions where they strengthen the manuscript without misrepresenting our existing results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] The three-tier synthesis process is described as balancing realism and controllability, but the manuscript provides no direct quantitative assessment (e.g., KL divergence, human-likeness ratings, or coreference pattern statistics) comparing the synthetic distribution to real human dialogues from disjoint corpora. This measurement is load-bearing for the claim that observed metric gains reflect genuine robustness rather than synthesis artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that a direct quantitative comparison to real dialogues from disjoint corpora would provide stronger evidence against synthesis artifacts. In the revised manuscript we will add this analysis to §3, reporting KL divergence on coreference and dialogue features, coreference pattern statistics, and human-likeness ratings collected on a held-out sample. These additions will directly address the load-bearing concern while remaining within the scope of the existing synthesis framework. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and §4] The assertion of 'consistent, substantial improvements' is stated without accompanying quantitative results, ablation studies on individual tiers, or details on evaluation metrics and baselines in the provided summary sections. This absence prevents verification that the central empirical claim is supported by the data.

    Authors: The full manuscript already contains the requested quantitative results, tier-wise ablations, metric definitions, and baseline comparisons in §4 and the associated tables. To improve accessibility from the summary sections, we will revise the abstract to include the most salient numerical gains and ensure §4 more explicitly cross-references the supporting evidence. This is a partial revision because the core empirical support exists in the body; the change mainly enhances visibility in the summary portions. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: empirical synthesis and evaluation remain self-contained

full rationale

The paper describes a three-tier data synthesis framework for generating dialogue grounding supervision and reports empirical gains from fine-tuning on the resulting data. No equations, fitted parameters, or first-principles derivations are present that could reduce to their own inputs by construction. The central claim rests on observed metric improvements across standard evaluations rather than any self-definitional mapping, renamed known result, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The distributional closeness assumption is an empirical premise open to external falsification and does not create circularity under the specified criteria.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The central claim implicitly assumes that synthetic data can stand in for real annotated dialogues without introducing unmeasured biases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5397 in / 1121 out tokens · 40098 ms · 2026-05-17T02:27:13.937848+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    [1, 2, 3] - is a key vision-language research task

    INTRODUCTION Referring Expression Comprehension (REC) - the task of locating a target referred to by a natural language descrip- tion. [1, 2, 3] - is a key vision-language research task. Recent advances have pushed the state of the art beyond simple surface matching toward richer use of semantic information —most notably, constructing compositional referr...

  2. [2]

    A three-tier data augmentation framework for solving the data sparsity of MDC-R [7], spanning short expressions to multi-turn dialogues

  3. [3]

    Experimental demonstration that the model trained on these synthetic data achieves notable improvements, with precision increasing by≈20%

  4. [4]

    The finding that biases across data types influence model learning and generalization, motivating the importance of distribution-aware training

  5. [5]

    Making Dialogue Grounding Data Rich: A Three-Tier Data Synthesis Framework for Generalized Referring Expression Comprehension

    RELA TED WORK REC and GRECREC has advanced rapidly in recent years. The early two-stage paradigm [14], couples off- arXiv:2512.02791v1 [cs.CL] 2 Dec 2025 the-shelf object detectors with linguistic cues to compute region–expression matching scores. The field has progressed from specialist to generalist grounding frameworks [15] that are pre-trained at scal...

  6. [6]

    Both lines of work aim to expand coverage and reduce manual labelling effort

    training signals. Both lines of work aim to expand coverage and reduce manual labelling effort. Based on pre- vious works, we propose three distinct tiers of data synthesis methods

  7. [7]

    the second green block from the top

    METHODOLOGY To balance data realism and controllability, we introduce a three-tier synthesis framework comprising: (i) template- based short expression synthesis, (ii) prompted short ex- pression synthesis, and (iii) full dialogue with coreference information synthesis. We detail the construction procedures and explain how the components integrate to prod...

  8. [8]

    indicates that off-the-shelf LLMs exhibit limited coref- erence tracking. We therefore fine-tune a Qwen2-VL [25] on external coreference-aware dialogue corpora [16], en- abling coherent generation of dialogues with explicit coref- erence chains in Minecraft scenes. The outputs contain (i) coreference-consistent dialogues and (ii) structured expres- sions,...

  9. [9]

    Dataset We adopted the MDC–R benchmark [7] for evaluation

    EXPERIMENT 4.1. Dataset We adopted the MDC–R benchmark [7] for evaluation. The MDC–R test split comprises 423 instances; each instance includes a scene image, a multi–turn dialogue, and an as- sociated target mention. As shown in Figure 3, given an input of dialogue and image, the model predicts multiple bounding boxes that should refer to the ground trut...

  10. [10]

    to learn to generate dialogues containing coreference information. 4.2. Bounding Boxes Reading MDC-R [7] has assigned a unique identifier to each block, composed of letters and Arabic numerals, e.g., A1. This en- sures that all entity mentions within a dialogue refer to distinct combinations of blocks. Minecraft allows obtaining the pixel locations of the...

  11. [11]

    We achieved substantial perfor- mance gains via a three-tier data synthesis method, followed by model fine-tuning

    CONCLUSION This paper addresses GREC data scarcity stemming from the high cost of annotation. We achieved substantial perfor- mance gains via a three-tier data synthesis method, followed by model fine-tuning. The method is generalizable to other vision-language tasks facing limited supervision. Future work could adopt distribution-aware training to mitiga...

  12. [12]

    Refer- itgame: Referring to objects in photographs of natural scenes,

    S. Kazemzadeh, V . Ordonez, M. Matten, and T. Berg, “Refer- itgame: Referring to objects in photographs of natural scenes,” inEMNLP, 2014, pp. 787–798

  13. [13]

    Model- ing context in referring expressions,

    L. Yu, P. Poirson, S. Yang, A. C. Berg, and T. L. Berg, “Model- ing context in referring expressions,” inEuropean conference on computer vision. Springer, 2016, pp. 69–85

  14. [14]

    Flickr30k entities: Col- lecting region-to-phrase correspondences for richer image-to- sentence models,

    B. A. Plummer, L. Wang, C. M. Cervantes, J. C. Caicedo, J. Hockenmaier, and S. Lazebnik, “Flickr30k entities: Col- lecting region-to-phrase correspondences for richer image-to- sentence models,” inProceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2015, pp. 2641–2649

  15. [15]

    Cops- ref: A new dataset and task on compositional referring expres- sion comprehension,

    Z. Chen, P. Wang, L. Ma, K.-Y . K. Wong, and Q. Wu, “Cops- ref: A new dataset and task on compositional referring expres- sion comprehension,” inCVPR, 2020, pp. 10 086–10 095

  16. [16]

    Give me something to eat: Referring expression comprehension with commonsense knowledge,

    P. Wang, D. Liu, H. Li, and Q. Wu, “Give me something to eat: Referring expression comprehension with commonsense knowledge,” inProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2020, pp. 28–36

  17. [17]

    Advanc- ing visual grounding with scene knowledge: Benchmark and method,

    Z. Chen, R. Zhang, Y . Song, X. Wan, and G. Li, “Advanc- ing visual grounding with scene knowledge: Benchmark and method,” inCVPR, 2023, pp. 15 039–15 049

  18. [18]

    Mdc-r: The minecraft dialogue corpus with reference,

    C. Madge, M. Camilleri, P. C. Garcia, V . Karan, J. Shao, P. Jayannavar, J. Hough, B. Roth, and M. Poesio, “Mdc-r: The minecraft dialogue corpus with reference,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.22062, 2025

  19. [19]

    GREC: Generalized Referring Expression Comprehension, 2023

    S. He, H. Ding, C. Liu, and X. Jiang, “Grec: Gener- alized referring expression comprehension,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16182, 2023

  20. [20]

    Collab- orative dialogue in minecraft,

    A. Narayan-Chen, P. Jayannavar, and J. Hockenmaier, “Collab- orative dialogue in minecraft,” inACL, 2019, pp. 5405–5415

  21. [21]

    Interactive grounded language understanding in a collabora- tive environment: Iglu 2021,

    J. Kiseleva, Z. Li, M. Aliannejadi, S. Mohanty, M. ter Hoeve, M. Burtsev, A. Skrynnik, A. Zholus, A. Panov, K. Srinetet al., “Interactive grounded language understanding in a collabora- tive environment: Iglu 2021,” inNeurIPS 2021 Competitions and Demonstrations Track. PMLR, 2022, pp. 146–161

  22. [22]

    Caesar: An embodied simulator for generating mul- timodal referring expression datasets,

    M. M. Islam, R. Mirzaiee, A. Gladstone, H. Green, and T. Iqbal, “Caesar: An embodied simulator for generating mul- timodal referring expression datasets,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 21 001–21 015, 2022

  23. [23]

    Metamath: Bootstrap your own mathematical questions for large language models,

    L. Yu, W. Jiang, H. Shi, J. YU, Z. Liu, Y . Zhang, J. Kwok, Z. Li, A. Weller, and W. Liu, “Metamath: Bootstrap your own mathematical questions for large language models,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Represen- tations

  24. [24]

    MathGenie: Generating synthetic data with ques- tion back-translation for enhancing mathematical reasoning of LLMs,

    Z. Lu, A. Zhou, H. Ren, K. Wang, W. Shi, J. Pan, M. Zhan, and H. Li, “MathGenie: Generating synthetic data with ques- tion back-translation for enhancing mathematical reasoning of LLMs,” inACL, 2024, pp. 2732–2747

  25. [25]

    Mattnet: Modular attention network for referring ex- pression comprehension,

    L. Yu, Z. Lin, X. Shen, J. Yang, X. Lu, M. Bansal, and T. L. Berg, “Mattnet: Modular attention network for referring ex- pression comprehension,” inCVPR, 2018, pp. 1307–1315

  26. [26]

    Mdetr-modulated detection for end-to-end multi- modal understanding,

    A. Kamath, M. Singh, Y . LeCun, G. Synnaeve, I. Misra, and N. Carion, “Mdetr-modulated detection for end-to-end multi- modal understanding,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF inter- national conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 1780–1790

  27. [27]

    Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution

    P. Wang, S. Bai, S. Tan, S. Wang, Z. Fan, J. Bai, K. Chen, X. Liu, J. Wang, W. Geet al., “Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision- language model’s perception of the world at any resolution,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12191, 2024

  28. [28]

    Recantformer: Referring expression comprehen- sion with varying numbers of targets,

    B. Hemanthage, H. Bilen, P. Bartie, C. Dondrup, and O. Lemon, “Recantformer: Referring expression comprehen- sion with varying numbers of targets,” inEMNLP, 2024, pp. 21 784–21 798

  29. [29]

    Jack of all tasks master of many: Designing general-purpose coarse-to-fine vision-language model,

    S. Pramanick, G. Han, R. Hou, S. Nag, S.-N. Lim, N. Ballas, Q. Wang, R. Chellappa, and A. Almahairi, “Jack of all tasks master of many: Designing general-purpose coarse-to-fine vision-language model,” inCVPR, 2024, pp. 14 076–14 088

  30. [30]

    Alfred: A bench- mark for interpreting grounded instructions for everyday tasks,

    M. Shridhar, J. Thomason, D. Gordon, Y . Bisk, W. Han, R. Mottaghi, L. Zettlemoyer, and D. Fox, “Alfred: A bench- mark for interpreting grounded instructions for everyday tasks,” inCVPR, 2020, pp. 10 740–10 749

  31. [31]

    Generating easy-to-understand referring ex- pressions for target identifications,

    M. Tanaka, T. Itamochi, K. Narioka, I. Sato, Y . Ushiku, and T. Harada, “Generating easy-to-understand referring ex- pressions for target identifications,” in2019 IEEE/CVF Inter- national Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019, pp. 5793–5802

  32. [32]

    Clevr-ref+: Diag- nosing visual reasoning with referring expressions,

    R. Liu, C. Liu, Y . Bai, and A. L. Yuille, “Clevr-ref+: Diag- nosing visual reasoning with referring expressions,” inCVPR, 2019, pp. 4185–4194

  33. [33]

    Harlequin: Color-driven generation of synthetic data for referring expression compre- hension,

    L. Parolari, E. Izzo, and L. Ballan, “Harlequin: Color-driven generation of synthetic data for referring expression compre- hension,” inInternational Conference on Pattern Recognition. Springer, 2025, pp. 292–307

  34. [34]

    Introducing GPT-4.1 in the API,

    OpenAI, “Introducing GPT-4.1 in the API,” https://openai. com/index/gpt-4-1/, Apr. 2025, accessed: Sep. 17, 2025

  35. [35]

    Assessing the capabilities of large language models in coreference: An evaluation,

    Y . Gan, J. Yu, and M. Poesio, “Assessing the capabilities of large language models in coreference: An evaluation,” in LREC-COLING 2024, 2024, pp. 1645–1665

  36. [36]

    What you see is what you get: Visual pronoun coreference resolution in dialogues,

    X. Yu, H. Zhang, Y . Song, Y . Song, and C. Zhang, “What you see is what you get: Visual pronoun coreference resolution in dialogues,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.00421, 2019