pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.03341 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-03 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech

Quench dynamics of the quantum XXZ chain with staggered interactions: Exact results and simulations on digital quantum computers

Ching-Tai Huang , Yu-Cheng Lin , Ferenc Igloi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords quench dynamicsXXZ chainstaggered interactionsentanglement entropyLoschmidt echoquantum simulationflat-band limitBell basis
0
0 comments X

The pith

A specific bond-interchange quench in the staggered XXZ chain produces exact size-independent formulas for entanglement entropies and Loschmidt echoes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that, in the flat-band limit of the quantum XXZ antiferromagnetic chain with staggered interactions, a quench that swaps the strengths of odd and even bonds on a fully dimerized initial state permits exact time-dependent wave functions for any even number of sites when the states are expressed in the Bell basis. From these states the authors derive closed-form expressions for both the von Neumann and the second Rényi entanglement entropies that contain no explicit dependence on chain length. They likewise obtain exact formulas for the Loschmidt echo and the associated return-rate function, locate the Loschmidt zeros that appear in finite chains, and determine the precise values of the anisotropy parameter that make the dynamical observables strictly periodic. These analytic results are then compared with two different quantum-circuit implementations on IBM-Q hardware.

Core claim

Working in the Bell basis for a fully dimerized initial chain, the interchange of odd- and even-bond strengths yields exact time-dependent states for arbitrary even system sizes; these states produce closed-form, size-independent expressions for the von Neumann and second-order Rényi entanglement entropies together with exact Loschmidt echoes whose zeros and finite-size scaling are explicitly identified and whose periodicity is controlled by definite conditions on the anisotropy parameter.

What carries the argument

The Bell-basis representation of the dimerized chain that converts the staggered-bond interchange into a set of independent two-site problems whose time evolution can be written in closed form.

If this is right

  • Entanglement entropies after the quench remain independent of chain length for all even sizes.
  • Loschmidt echoes exhibit a distinct finite-size scaling at critical times that is controlled by the anisotropy.
  • The dynamical observables become strictly periodic when the anisotropy satisfies the derived algebraic conditions.
  • Loschmidt zeros appear at specific times in every finite even-length chain.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The closed-form expressions supply exact benchmarks that can be used to calibrate error-mitigation techniques on present-day quantum hardware.
  • The same Bell-basis mapping may be reusable for other staggered or dimerized initial states provided the flat-band condition holds.
  • The identified periodicity conditions suggest a route to engineering periodic many-body dynamics without fine-tuning the entire Hamiltonian.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation requires the flat-band limit together with a fully dimerized initial state and the precise quench that interchanges odd- and even-bond strengths, which together allow exact states only for even system sizes.

What would settle it

Numerical simulation of the same quench outside the flat-band limit should produce entanglement entropies that grow with system size or Loschmidt echoes whose zeros disappear for the anisotropy values where the analytic expressions predict periodicity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.03341 by Ching-Tai Huang, Ferenc Igloi, Yu-Cheng Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Overlap diagrams for a positive (a), negative (b) and zero [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Sketch of the bipartition for chains with PBC and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time dependence of the exact Loschmidt echo for the XXZ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Time dependence of the half-chain von Neumann entangle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time dependence of the return rate function calculated from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Time dependence of the Loschmidt echo [(a) and (c)] and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Hadamard test circuit for computing the real part of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Quantum circuits to generate four Bell states: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Nonzero amplitudes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Simulation results (solid lines) for the half-chain entanglement entropies and the Loschmidt echo for a chain of length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Simulation results (solid lines) for the half-chain R [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Results of random Pauli measurements for dynamical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate quench dynamics in the quantum $S=1/2$ XXZ antiferromagnetic chain with staggered and anisotropic interactions in the flat-band limit. Our quench protocol interchanges the odd- and even-bond strengths of a fully dimerized chain, enabling us to derive exact time-dependent states for arbitrary even system sizes by working in the Bell basis. We obtain closed-form, size-independent expressions for the von Neumann and second-order R\'enyi entanglement entropies. We further calculate exact Loschmidt echoes and the corresponding return rate functions across various anisotropies and system sizes, and identify Loschmidt zeros in finite chains. Our analysis reveals distinct finite-size scaling of the Loschmidt echo at critical times with chain length and identifies the precise conditions on the anisotropy parameter governing the periodicity of the dynamical observables. In addition to the analytic study, we perform two types of numerical experiments on IBM-Q quantum devices. First, we use the Hadamard test to estimate the Bell-basis expansion coefficients and reconstruct the dynamical states, achieving accurate entanglement entropies and the Loschmidt echo for small systems. Second, we implement Trotter-error-free time-evolution circuits combined with randomized Pauli measurements. Post-processing via statistical correlations and classical shadows yields reliable estimates of the second-order R\'enyi entanglement entropy and the Loschmidt echo, showing satisfactory agreement with exact results.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies quench dynamics in the S=1/2 XXZ antiferromagnetic chain with staggered interactions in the flat-band limit. The quench interchanges odd- and even-bond strengths starting from a fully dimerized state. Working in the Bell basis, the authors derive exact time-dependent states for arbitrary even system sizes and obtain closed-form, size-independent expressions for the von Neumann and second-order Rényi entanglement entropies. They also compute exact Loschmidt echoes, return rate functions, and Loschmidt zeros, identify anisotropy conditions for periodicity, and report finite-size scaling. The analytic results are supplemented by two sets of experiments on IBM-Q devices: Hadamard-test reconstruction of Bell-basis coefficients and Trotter-error-free evolution with randomized Pauli measurements and classical shadows, both showing agreement with the exact expressions.

Significance. If the central analytic claims hold, the work supplies exact, parameter-free benchmarks for non-equilibrium entanglement dynamics and Loschmidt echoes in a solvable limit of the XXZ chain, together with direct validation on current quantum hardware. The combination of closed-form results for entanglement entropies and Loschmidt quantities with device experiments is a clear strength and provides reproducible reference data for quantum simulation studies.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3] §3 (exact time-evolved states) and the subsequent entanglement-entropy derivation: the size-independent closed-form expressions for the von Neumann and Rényi entropies rest on the time-evolved state remaining a product of local Bell states with no residual dimer-dimer couplings. The staggered anisotropy terms in the flat-band XXZ Hamiltonian can in principle generate effective next-nearest-neighbor interactions once the odd/even bonds are interchanged; an explicit demonstration that the Hamiltonian matrix remains strictly block-diagonal in the Bell basis for every even N (with no N-dependent off-diagonal elements) is required to secure the central claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 2] The caption of Figure 2 should explicitly list the anisotropy values (Δ) used for each curve to allow immediate comparison with the periodicity conditions stated in the text.
  2. [§5.2] In the description of the classical-shadow protocol, the number of shots per Pauli string and the shadow-norm bound used for error estimation should be stated numerically.
  3. [§2] A brief remark on the choice of even system sizes only (N=4,6,8,…) would clarify why odd lengths are excluded from the exact results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive major comment. We address the point raised in detail below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (exact time-evolved states) and the subsequent entanglement-entropy derivation: the size-independent closed-form expressions for the von Neumann and Rényi entropies rest on the time-evolved state remaining a product of local Bell states with no residual dimer-dimer couplings. The staggered anisotropy terms in the flat-band XXZ Hamiltonian can in principle generate effective next-nearest-neighbor interactions once the odd/even bonds are interchanged; an explicit demonstration that the Hamiltonian matrix remains strictly block-diagonal in the Bell basis for every even N (with no N-dependent off-diagonal elements) is required to secure the central claim.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's request for an explicit demonstration of the block-diagonal structure. In the flat-band limit, the staggered XXZ Hamiltonian, after the quench that interchanges odd- and even-bond strengths, acts locally on each dimer without generating inter-dimer couplings in the Bell basis. This is because the anisotropy terms produce only on-site phase accumulations on the individual Bell states, with no matrix elements connecting different dimer configurations. The derivation in §3 proceeds by writing the initial fully dimerized state as a product of local Bell states and showing that the time-evolution operator factors accordingly, yielding N-independent coefficients (see Eqs. (3)–(5) and the subsequent entanglement-entropy formulas). While the absence of off-diagonal terms follows directly from this factorization for arbitrary even N, we agree that an explicit matrix-element calculation would strengthen the presentation. We will therefore add a short appendix in the revised manuscript that tabulates the Hamiltonian matrix elements in the Bell basis for general even N and confirms the strict block-diagonality with no N-dependent couplings. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; exact results follow from Bell-basis diagonalization under stated model assumptions

full rationale

The paper derives closed-form, size-independent entanglement entropies and Loschmidt echoes by rewriting the initial dimerized state and the staggered flat-band XXZ Hamiltonian in the Bell basis, then solving the time evolution exactly for even N. This is a direct application of standard quantum mechanics to a specially chosen quench protocol and limit; the resulting expressions are obtained by explicit matrix exponentiation or product-state evolution within decoupled blocks, without any parameter fitting, renaming of known results, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claims rest on the block-diagonal property holding for the chosen Hamiltonian and initial state, which is an independent model assumption rather than a reduction to the outputs themselves. No step equates a prediction to its input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the flat-band limit as a domain assumption that simplifies the staggered XXZ Hamiltonian to allow exact Bell-basis solutions; no free parameters are explicitly fitted, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The initial state is a fully dimerized product state in the flat-band limit of the staggered XXZ chain.
    Invoked to enable the quench protocol and exact time evolution in the Bell basis for even system sizes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5559 in / 1320 out tokens · 38576 ms · 2026-05-17T03:10:47.682168+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Expectation values after an integrable boundary quantum quench

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A form factor framework is introduced to compute expectation values and time evolution after an integrable boundary quantum quench, applied to the Lee-Yang model at conformal and massive points with TCSA validation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Kinoshita, T

    T. Kinoshita, T. Wenger, and D. S. Weiss, A quantum Newton’s cradle, Nature440, 900 (2006)

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Hofferberth, I

    S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, B. Fischer, T. Schumm, and J. Schmiedmayer, Non-equilibrium coherence dynamics in one- dimensional Bose gases, Nature449, 324 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Trotzkyet al., Probing the relaxation towards equilibrium in an isolated strongly correlated 1D Bose gas, Nat

    S. Trotzkyet al., Probing the relaxation towards equilibrium in an isolated strongly correlated 1D Bose gas, Nat. Phys.8, 325 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Meinertet al., Many-body quantum quench in an atomic one- dimensional Ising chain, Phys

    F. Meinertet al., Many-body quantum quench in an atomic one- dimensional Ising chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 053003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Langenet al., Experimental observation of a generalized Gibbs ensemble, Science348, 207 (2015)

    T. Langenet al., Experimental observation of a generalized Gibbs ensemble, Science348, 207 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Fauseweh, Quantum many-body simulations on digital quan- tum computers: State-of-the-art and future challenges, Nat

    B. Fauseweh, Quantum many-body simulations on digital quan- tum computers: State-of-the-art and future challenges, Nat. Commun.15, 2123 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Mueller, J

    N. Mueller, J. A. Carolan, A. Connelly, Z. Davoudi, E. F. Du- mitrescu,and K. Yeter-Aydeniz, Quantum computation of dy- namical quantum phase transitions and entanglement tomogra- phy in a lattice gauge theory, PRX Quantum4, 030323 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Smith, M

    A. Smith, M. S. Kim, F. Pollmann, and J. Knolle, Simulat- ing quantum many-body dynamics on a current digital quantum computer, npj Quantum Information5, 106 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    S.-H. Lin, R. Dilip, A. G. Green, A. Smith, and F. Pollmann, Real- and imaginary-time evolution with compressed quantum circuits, PRX Quantum2, 010342 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    V ovrosh and J

    J. V ovrosh and J. Knolle, Confinement and entanglement dy- namics on a digital quantum computer, Scientific Reports11, 11577 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    V ovrosh, K

    J. V ovrosh, K. E. Khosla, S. Greenaway, C. Self, M. S. Kim, and J. Knolle, Simple mitigation of global depolarizing errors in quantum simulations, Phys. Rev. E104, 035309 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    J. M. Koh, T. Tai, and C. H. Lee, Simulation of Interaction- Induced Chiral Topological Dynamics on a Digital Quantum Computer, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 140502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Chang, H.-C

    H.-C. Chang, H.-C. Hsu, and Y .-C. Lin, Probing entanglement dynamics and topological transitions on noisy intermediate- scale quantum computers, Phys. Rev. Research7, 013043 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Meson spectroscopy of exotic symmetries of Ising criticality in Rydberg atom arrays

    J. V ovrosh, J. de Hond, S. Juli ´a-Farr´e, J. Knolle, A. Dauphin, Meson spectroscopy of exotic symmetries of Ising criticality in Rydberg atom arrays, arXiv:2506.21299 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    H.-T. Hung, I. N. M. Le, J. Knolle, Y .-J. Kao, Improved Ising Meson Spectroscopy Simulation on a Noisy Digital Quantum Device, arXiv:2512.02516 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    M. K. Giri and P. Chen, Digital Quantum Simulation of Flat-Band and All-Bands-Flat Dynamics for Tunable Quantum Transport, arXiv:2508.08734 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Mitra, Quantum Quench Dynamics, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics9, 245 (2018)

    A. Mitra, Quantum Quench Dynamics, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics9, 245 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed sys- tem, Phys. Rev. A43, 2046 (1991)

    work page 2046

  19. [19]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V . Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature452, 854 (2008)

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    Polkovnikov, K

    A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 863 (2011)

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y . Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical me- chanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys.65, 239 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    M. A. Cazalilla, Effect of suddenly turning on interactions in the Luttinger model, Phys Rev Lett97, 156403 (2006)

    work page 2006

  23. [23]

    Rigol, A

    M. Rigol, A. Muramatsu, and M. Olshanii, Hard-core bosons on optical lattices: Dynamics and relaxation in the superfluid and insulating regimes, Phys. Rev. A74, 053616 (2006)

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V . Dunjko, V . Yurovsky, and M. Olshanii, Relaxation in a completely integrable many-body quantum system: An ab initio study of the dynamics of the highly excited states of 1D lattice hard-core bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 050405 (2007)

    work page 2007

  25. [25]

    Calabrese, F

    P. Calabrese, F. H. L. Essler, M. Fagotti, Quantum quench in the transverse-field ising chain, Phys Rev Lett106, 227203 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Caux and F

    J.-S. Caux and F. H. L. Essler, Time evolution of local observ- ables after quenching to an integrable model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 257203 (2013). 15

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    Wouters, J

    B. Wouters, J. De Nardis, M. Brockmann, D. Fioretto, M. Rigol, and J.-S. Caux, Quenching the Anisotropic Heisenberg Chain: Exact Solution and Generalized Gibbs Ensemble Predictions, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 117202 (2014)

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Ilievski, J

    E. Ilievski, J. De Nardis, B. Wouters, J.-S. Caux, F. H. L. Essler, and T. Prosen, Complete Generalized Gibbs Ensembles in an Interacting Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 157201 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    F. H. L. Essler, G. Mussardo, and M. Panfil, Generalized Gibbs ensembles for quantum field theories, Phys. Rev. A91, 051602(R) (2015)

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Kormos, M

    M. Kormos, M. Collura, G. Tak´acs, and P. Calabrese, Real time confinement following a quantum quench to a non-integrable model, Nat. Phys.13, 246 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, M. Lencs´es, I. M. Sz´ecs´enyi, and J. Viti, Entanglement Oscillations near a Quantum Critical Point, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 230601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Chanda, J

    T. Chanda, J. Zakrzewski, M. Lewenstein, and L. Tagliacozzo, Confinement and Lack of Thermalization After Quenches in the Bosonic Schwinger Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 180602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Menu and T

    R. Menu and T. Roscilde, Quench dynamics of quantum spin models with flat bands of excitations, Phys. Rev. B98, 205145 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    J. G. C. Martinezet al., Flat-band localization and interaction- induced delocalization of photons, Sci. Adv.9, eadj7195 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Ziraldo, and G

    S. Ziraldo, and G. E. Santoro, Relaxation and thermalization after a quantum quench: Why localization is important, Phys. Rev. B87, 064201 (2013)

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Wilming, T

    H. Wilming, T. J. Osborne, K. S. C Decker, et al. Reviving prod- uct states in the disordered Heisenberg chain, Nat Commun14, 5847 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, Z. Pa- pic, Quantum many-body scars, Nat. Phys.14, 745 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    O’Dea and A

    N. O’Dea and A. Sriram, Entanglement Oscillations from Many-Body Quantum Scars, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 210402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Cleve, A

    R. Cleve, A. Ekert, C. Macchiavello, and M. Mosca, Quantum algorithms revisited, Proc. R. Soc. A454, 339 (1998)

    work page 1998

  40. [40]

    Vermersch, A

    B. Vermersch, A. Elben, M. Dalmonte, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Unitary n-designs via random quenches in atomic Hubbard and spin models: Application to the measurement of R ´enyi en- tropies, Phys. Rev. A97, 023604 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Brydges, A

    T. Brydges, A. Elben, P. Jurcevic, B. Vermersch, C. Maier, B. P. Lanyon, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Probing R´enyi entanglement entropy via randomized measurements, Science 364, 260 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Elben, B

    A. Elben, B. Vermersch, C. F. Roos, and P. Zoller, Statis- tical correlations between locally randomized measurements: A toolbox for probing entanglement in many-body quantum states, Phys. Rev. A99, 052323 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Huang, R

    H.-Y . Huang, R. Kueng, and J. Preskill, Predicting many prop- erties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nat. Phys.16, 1050 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Elben, S

    A. Elben, S. T. Flammia, H.-Y . Huang, R. Kueng, B. Vermer- sch, and P. Zoller, The randomized measurement toolbox, Na- ture Reviews Physics5, 9 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two Soluble Models of an Antiferromagnetic Chain, Annals of Physics16, 407 (1961)

    work page 1961

  46. [46]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in Poly- acetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 1698 (1979)

    work page 1979

  47. [47]

    Bethe, Zur Theorie der Metalle

    H. Bethe, Zur Theorie der Metalle. I. Eigenwerte und Eigen- funktionen der linearen Atomkette, Z. Phys.71, 205 (1931)

    work page 1931

  48. [48]

    Pytte, Peierls instability in Heisenberg chains, Phys

    E. Pytte, Peierls instability in Heisenberg chains, Phys. Rev. B 10, 4637 (1974)

    work page 1974

  49. [49]

    M. C. Cross and D. S. Fisher, A new theory of the spin- Peierls transition with special relevance to the experiments on TTFCuBDT, Phys. Rev. B19, 402 (1979)

    work page 1979

  50. [50]

    Sutherland, Systems with resonating-valence-bond ground states: Correlations and excitations, Phys

    B. Sutherland, Systems with resonating-valence-bond ground states: Correlations and excitations, Phys. Rev. B373786 (1988)

    work page 1988

  51. [51]

    K. S. D. Beach, A. W. Sandvik, Some formal results for the valence bond basis, Nuclear Physics B750142 (2006)

    work page 2006

  52. [52]

    Gong and M

    Z. Gong and M. Ueda, Topological entanglement-spectrum crossing in quench dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 250601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, and S. Kehrein, Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in the Transverse-Field Ising Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 135704 (2013)

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    Karrasch and D

    C. Karrasch and D. Schuricht, Dynamical Phase Transitions after Quenches in Nonintegrable Models, Phys. Rev. B87, 195104 (2013)

    work page 2013

  55. [55]

    Heyl, Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in Systems with Broken-Symmetry Phases, Phys

    M. Heyl, Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in Systems with Broken-Symmetry Phases, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 205701 (2014)

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    Andraschko and J

    F. Andraschko and J. Sirker, Dynamical Quantum Phase Tran- sitions and the Loschmidt Echo: A Transfer Matrix Approach, Phys. Rev. B89, 125120 (2014)

    work page 2014

  57. [57]

    Vajna and B

    S. Vajna and B. D ´ora, Disentangling Dynamical Phase Tran- sitions from Equilibrium Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. B89, 161105 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    A. A. Zvyagin, Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions (Review Article), J. Low Temp. Phys. 42, 971 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review, Rep

    M. Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.81054001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    B. Zhou, Y . Zeng, and S. Chen, Exact zeros of the Loschmidt echo and quantum speed limit time for the dynamical quan- tum phase transition in finite-size systems, Phys. Rev. B104, 094311 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Y . Zeng, B. Zhou, and S. Chen, Dynamical singularity of the rate function for quench dynamics in finite-size quantum sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B107, 134302 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    P.-Garc ´ıa, L

    D. P.-Garc ´ıa, L. Santilli, and M. Tierz, Dynamical quantum phase transitions from random matrix theory, Quantum8, 1271 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Eisler and I

    V . Eisler and I. Peschel, Entanglement in a periodic quench, Ann. Phys. (Berlin)17, 410 (2008)

    work page 2008

  64. [64]

    H. F. Trotter, On the product of semi-groups of operators, Proc. Am. Math. Soc.10, 545 (1959)

    work page 1959

  65. [65]

    Sch ¨utzhold, M

    R. Sch ¨utzhold, M. Uhlmann, Y . Xu, and U. R. Fischer, Sweep- ing from the Superfluid to the Mott Phase in the Bose-Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 200601 (2006)

    work page 2006

  66. [66]

    Uhlmann, R

    M. Uhlmann, R. Sch ¨utzhold, and U. R. Fischer, V ortex Quan- tum Creation and Winding Number Scaling in a Quenched Spinor Bose Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 120407 (2007)

    work page 2007

  67. [67]

    Pellegrini, S

    F. Pellegrini, S. Montangero, G. E. Santoro, and R. Fazio, Adi- abatic quenches through an extended quantum critical region, Phys. Rev. B77, 140404(R) (2008)

    work page 2008

  68. [68]

    Sharma, U

    S. Sharma, U. Divakaran, A. Polkovnikov, and A. Dutta, Slow quenches in a quantum Ising chain: Dynamical phase transi- tions and topology, Phys. Rev. B93, 144306 (2016)

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    H. Ni, H. Li, and L. Ying, On low-depth algorithms for quantum phase estimation, Quantum7, 1165 (2023)

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    Y . Yang, A. Christianen, M. C. Ba ˜nuls, D. S. Wild, and J. I. Cirac, Phase-Sensitive Quantum Measurement without Controlled Operations, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 220601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    B. F. Schiffer, D. S. Wild, N. Maskara, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, Hardware-efficient quantum phase estimation via local control, arXiv:2506.18765 (2025). 16

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    L. C. Tazi, D. M. Ramo, A. J. W. Thom, Shallow Quan- tum Scalar Products with Phase Information, arXiv:2411.19072 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Lenihan, et al, Excitation Amplitude Sampling for Low Variance Electronic Structure on Quantum Computers, arXiv:2506.15438 (2025)

    C. Lenihan, et al, Excitation Amplitude Sampling for Low Variance Electronic Structure on Quantum Computers, arXiv:2506.15438 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Mastorakis, et al, Resource-Efficient Hadamard Test Circuits for Nonlinear Dynamics on a Trapped-Ion Quantum Computer, arXiv:2507.19250 (2025)

    E. Mastorakis, et al, Resource-Efficient Hadamard Test Circuits for Nonlinear Dynamics on a Trapped-Ion Quantum Computer, arXiv:2507.19250 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025