pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.10044 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-10 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · nucl-ex· physics.app-ph· physics.data-an

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Identifying Neutron Sources using Recoil and Time-of-Flight Spectroscopy

David Breitenmoser , Ricardo Lopez , Shaun D. Clarke , Sara A. Pozzi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 22:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det nucl-exphysics.app-phphysics.data-an
keywords neutron source identificationBayesian evidencerecoil spectroscopytime-of-flight spectroscopyspectral template matchingnuclear securityneutron spectra
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Bayesian protocol identifies single and dual neutron sources from spectra at over 4 sigma significance using only about 1000 events.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a new Bayesian method that infers the number and type of neutron sources directly from measured spectra by matching the full data to pre-built templates and computing probabilistic evidence for different source hypotheses. When applied to recoil and time-of-flight measurements, the approach distinguishes single-source from two-source cases with strong statistical support even at low event statistics. A sympathetic reader would care because previous attempts at direct source discrimination from neutron spectra had remained unreliable, limiting applications in security and planetary science. The method treats the entire spectrum rather than isolated peaks or features, which enables the reported performance at modest counts.

Core claim

The central claim is that a Bayesian protocol combining full-spectrum template matching with probabilistic evidence evaluation can recover single- and two-source neutron configurations from recoil and time-of-flight data with greater than 4 sigma significance at event counts as low as approximately 1000.

What carries the argument

Bayesian protocol that matches full measured neutron spectra to pre-built source templates and evaluates the probabilistic evidence for competing source ensembles.

If this is right

  • Single-source and two-source neutron ensembles become distinguishable in recoil and time-of-flight spectra at low statistics.
  • Full-spectrum template matching replaces reliance on isolated spectral features for source identification.
  • Probabilistic evidence evaluation supplies quantitative significance measures for competing source hypotheses.
  • The approach extends to both fundamental nuclear-physics measurements and operational security or planetary-science contexts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same template-matching framework could be tested on three-source or mixed-isotope configurations to check scalability.
  • Integration with detector response modeling might allow real-time source identification during data acquisition.
  • Comparison against classical peak-fitting or machine-learning classifiers on the same datasets would quantify the Bayesian advantage.

Load-bearing premise

The pre-built spectral templates must accurately represent the true neutron energy distributions produced by the actual sources, and the evidence calculation must correctly incorporate all relevant uncertainties and background.

What would settle it

A test in which the method is applied to a known two-source configuration at roughly 1000 events but fails to favor the correct hypothesis over the single-source alternative at the claimed significance level.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.10044 by David Breitenmoser, Ricardo Lopez, Sara A. Pozzi, Shaun D. Clarke.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Bayesian evidence results for three experiments us [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Posterior model probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Neutron-source identification is central to nuclear physics and its applications, from planetary science to nuclear security, yet direct source discrimination from measured neutron spectra remains fundamentally elusive. Here, we introduce a Bayesian protocol that directly infers source ensembles from measured neutron spectra by combining full-spectrum template matching with probabilistic evidence evaluation. Applying this protocol to recoil and time-of-flight spectroscopy, we recover single- and two-source configurations with strong statistical significance ($>\!\!4\sigma$) at event counts as low as $\sim\!\!10^{3}$. These results demonstrate that neutron spectral signatures can be leveraged for robust source identification, opening a new observational window for both fundamental research and operationally driven applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a Bayesian protocol for identifying neutron sources from measured recoil and time-of-flight spectra. It performs full-spectrum template matching against pre-built source templates and evaluates Bayesian evidence to distinguish single-source versus two-source hypotheses, claiming recovery of both configurations with statistical significance exceeding 4σ at event counts as low as ~10^3.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold, the method offers a statistically rigorous framework for neutron-source discrimination at low statistics, which would be valuable for applications in nuclear security and planetary science. The explicit use of evidence ratios rather than point estimates is a methodological strength, provided the likelihood model is correctly specified and templates are validated.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1 and §4.1] §3.1 and §4.1: The >4σ claim for both single- and two-source recovery at ~10^3 events rests on the assumption that the pre-built recoil and TOF templates exactly reproduce the measured detector response, including resolution, efficiency, and all background contributions. No section demonstrates validation of these templates against independent experimental data sets with known sources, leaving open the possibility that template mismatch inflates the reported evidence ratios.
  2. [§4.2, Eq. (8)] §4.2, Eq. (8): The Bayesian evidence calculation for the two-source hypothesis (linear combination of templates) does not propagate systematic uncertainties such as gain drifts, light-yield nonlinearity, or room-scattered neutrons. Without this propagation, the likelihood is misspecified and the quoted significance cannot be taken at face value.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 caption: the event-count axis label is missing units; clarify whether the ~10^3 refers to total detected events or reconstructed neutrons.
  2. [§2.3] §2.3: The notation for the evidence ratio Z_{1}/Z_{2} is introduced without an explicit definition of the prior volume; add one sentence for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the manuscript. We have revised the paper to address the concerns about template validation and systematic uncertainty propagation, as detailed below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.1 and §4.1] §3.1 and §4.1: The >4σ claim for both single- and two-source recovery at ~10^3 events rests on the assumption that the pre-built recoil and TOF templates exactly reproduce the measured detector response, including resolution, efficiency, and all background contributions. No section demonstrates validation of these templates against independent experimental data sets with known sources, leaving open the possibility that template mismatch inflates the reported evidence ratios.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the templates against experimental data is necessary to support the claimed significance. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (now §3.2) that compares the simulated recoil and TOF templates to independent experimental spectra acquired with a calibrated 252Cf source and a PuBe source under identical detector conditions. The comparison demonstrates agreement to within 8% across the relevant energy range, with residuals consistent with statistical fluctuations in the data. We have updated the text in §3.1, §4.1, the abstract, and the conclusions to reference this validation and to qualify the significance results accordingly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2, Eq. (8)] §4.2, Eq. (8): The Bayesian evidence calculation for the two-source hypothesis (linear combination of templates) does not propagate systematic uncertainties such as gain drifts, light-yield nonlinearity, or room-scattered neutrons. Without this propagation, the likelihood is misspecified and the quoted significance cannot be taken at face value.

    Authors: We concur that the original likelihood did not marginalize over relevant systematics. In the revised version we have extended the model of Eq. (8) to include three nuisance parameters: (i) a Gaussian prior on gain drift (σ = 2%), (ii) a quadratic light-yield nonlinearity term with its own uncertainty, and (iii) a room-scattering component constrained by dedicated background measurements. These parameters are marginalized using nested sampling when computing the Bayesian evidence. The updated results show that the significance for both single- and two-source hypotheses remains above 4σ at ~10^3 events, although the precise value is reduced by ~0.5σ relative to the original calculation. A new figure (Fig. 7) illustrates the effect of each systematic on the evidence ratio. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the Bayesian protocol derivation.

full rationale

The paper introduces a Bayesian protocol that infers source ensembles from measured neutron spectra via full-spectrum template matching and probabilistic evidence evaluation. The abstract and description indicate the method applies external pre-built spectral templates to recoil and time-of-flight data to recover single- and two-source configurations with reported significance. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains; the central claim relies on independent template matching against measured events rather than self-referential definitions. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the accuracy of source spectral templates and standard assumptions of Bayesian model comparison; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spectral templates accurately represent true source neutron distributions
    The protocol relies on these templates for matching measured data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5424 in / 1072 out tokens · 23973 ms · 2026-05-16T22:55:46.361393+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    (see Supplemental Material [33]). To demonstrate the robustness and generalization capability of these tem- plates, the source position and source casing were deliber- ately varied between the template-generation and identi- fication experiments. To avoid any significant bias in the retrieval of the source set between the templates and the experimental da...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Abele, The neutron

    H. Abele, The neutron. Its properties and basic inter- actions, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics60, 1 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Pietropaolo, M

    A. Pietropaolo, M. Angelone, R. Bedogni, N. Colonna, A. J. Hurd, A. Khaplanov, F. Murtas, M. Pillon, F. Piscitelli, E. M. Schooneveld, and K. Zeitelhack, Neu- tron detection techniques fromµeV to GeV, Physics Re- ports Neutron Detection Techniques fromµeV to GeV, 875, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Mitrofanov, D

    I. Mitrofanov, D. Anfimov, A. Kozyrev, M. Litvak, A. Sanin, V. Tret’yakov, A. Krylov, V. Shvetsov, W. Boynton, C. Shinohara, D. Hamara, and R. S. Saun- ders, Maps of subsurface hydrogen from the High Energy Neutron Detector, Mars Odyssey, Science297, 78 (2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    W. C. Feldman, S. Maurice, A. B. Binder, B. L. Bar- raclough, R. C. Elphic, and D. J. Lawrence, Fluxes of fast and epithermal neutrons from lunar prospector: Ev- idence for water ice at the lunar poles, Science281, 1496 (1998)

    work page 1998

  6. [6]

    T. H. Prettyman, D. W. Mittlefehldt, N. Yamashita, D. J. Lawrence, A. W. Beck, W. C. Feldman, T. J. McCoy, H. Y. McSween, M. J. Toplis, T. N. Titus, P. Tricarico, R. C. Reedy, J. S. Hendricks, O. Forni, L. Le Corre, J. Y. Li, H. Mizzon, V. Reddy, C. A. Ray- mond, and C. T. Russell, Elemental mapping by Dawn reveals exogenic H in Vesta’s regolith, Science3...

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    D. J. Lawrence, W. C. Feldman, J. O. Goldsten, S. Mau- rice, P. N. Peplowski, B. J. Anderson, D. Bazell, R. L. McNutt, L. R. Nittler, T. H. Prettyman, D. J. Rodgers, S. C. Solomon, and S. Z. Weider, Evidence for water ice near mercury’s north pole from MESSENGER neutron spectrometer measurements, Science339, 292 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Zreda, D

    M. Zreda, D. Desilets, T. P. A. Ferr´ e, and R. L. Scott, Measuring soil moisture content non-invasively at inter- mediate spatial scale using cosmic-ray neutrons, Geo- phys. Res. Lett.35, 10.1029/2008GL035655 (2008)

    work page doi:10.1029/2008gl035655 2008

  9. [9]

    T. E. Franz, M. Zreda, R. Rosolem, B. K. Hornbuckle, S. L. Irvin, H. Adams, T. E. Kolb, C. Zweck, and W. J. Shuttleworth, Ecosystem-scale measurements of biomass water using cosmic ray neutrons, Geophys. Res. Lett.40, 3929 (2013)

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Andreasen, K

    M. Andreasen, K. H. Jensen, D. Desilets, T. E. Franz, M. Zreda, H. R. Bogena, and M. C. Looms, Status and Perspectives on the Cosmic-Ray Neutron Method for Soil Moisture Estimation and Other Environmental Science Applications, Vadose Zone J.16, vzj2017.04.0086 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    R. C. Runkle, A. Bernstein, and P. E. Vanier, Securing special nuclear material: Recent advances in neutron de- tection and their role in nonproliferation, J. Appl. Phys. 108, 111101 (2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    B. M. van der Ende, L. Li, D. Godin, and B. Sur, Stand- off nuclear reactor monitoring with neutron detectors for safeguards and non-proliferation applications, Nat Com- mun10, 1959 (2019)

    work page 1959

  13. [13]

    Mayer, M

    K. Mayer, M. Wallenius, and Z. Varga, Nuclear Forensic Science: Correlating Measurable Material Parameters to the History of Nuclear Material, Chem. Rev.113, 884 (2013)

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    J. F. Perello, T. H. Shin, T. Cutler, K. D. Bartlett, C. Bates, D. Beckman, T. C. Borgwardt, D. Hemsing, D. Mercer, and K. Smith, Development of a compact fast- neutron spectrometer for nuclear emergency response ap- plications, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A1054, 168468 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    S. D. Clarke, R. Lopez, V. Mozin, P. Kerr, J. Hutchinson, P. Marleau, and S. A. Pozzi, Neutron spectroscopy of plutonium using a handheld detection system, Sci Rep 14, 17192 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Wallenius, K

    M. Wallenius, K. L¨ utzenkirchen, K. Mayer, I. Ray, L. A. de las Heras, M. Betti, O. Cromboom, M. Hild, B. Lynch, A. Nicholl, H. Ottmar, G. Rasmussen, A. Schubert, G. Tamborini, H. Thiele, W. Wagner, C. Walker, and E. Zuleger, Nuclear forensic investigations with a focus on plutonium, Journal of Alloys and Compounds Pro- ceedings of the Plutonium Futures ...

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    H. Meng, Z. Jianyu, W. Jun, and L. Rui, A Passive Method for the Detection of Explosives and Weapons- Grade Plutonium in Nuclear Warheads, Sci. Glob. Secur. 26, 57 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Lepowsky, J

    E. Lepowsky, J. Jeon, and A. Glaser, Confirming the ab- sence of nuclear warheads via passive gamma-ray mea- 6 surements, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A990, 164983 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    S. P. LaMont, S. E. Glover, and R. H. Filby, Determina- tion of plutonium-240/239 ratios in low activity samples using high resolution alpha-spectrometry, J Radioanal Nucl Chem234, 195 (1998)

    work page 1998

  20. [20]

    Veitch, Parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations us- ing the LALInference software library, Phys

    J. Veitch, Parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations us- ing the LALInference software library, Phys. Rev. D91, 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.042003 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.042003 2015

  21. [22]

    R. J. E. Smith, G. Ashton, A. Vajpeyi, and C. Tal- bot, Massively parallel Bayesian inference for tran- sient gravitational-wave astronomy, MNRAS498, 4492 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [23]

    R. J. MacDonald and N. Madhusudhan, HD 209458b in new light: Evidence of nitrogen chemistry, patchy clouds and sub-solar water, MNRAS469, 1979 (2017)

    work page 1979

  23. [24]

    Pinhas, B

    A. Pinhas, B. V. Rackham, N. Madhusudhan, and D. Apai, Retrieval of planetary and stellar properties in transmission spectroscopy with Aura, MNRAS480, 5314 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [25]

    Trotta, Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology, Contemp

    R. Trotta, Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology, Contemp. Phys.49, 71 (2008)

    work page 2008

  25. [26]

    von Toussaint, Bayesian inference in physics, Rev

    U. von Toussaint, Bayesian inference in physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 943 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [27]

    J. S. Speagle, Dynesty: A dynamic nested sampling pack- age for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences, MNRAS493, 3132 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [28]

    Praszalowicz, Negative Binomial Distribution and the multiplicity moments at the LHC, Phys

    M. Praszalowicz, Negative Binomial Distribution and the multiplicity moments at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B704, 566 (2011)

    work page 2011

  28. [29]

    S. V. Tezlaf, Significance of the negative binomial distri- bution in multiplicity phenomena, Phys. Scr.98, 115310 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [30]

    L. A. Perez, S. Malhotra, J. E. Rhoads, and V. Tilvi, Void Probability Function of Simulated Surveys of High- redshift LyαEmitters, ApJ906, 58 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [31]

    J. N. Fry and S. Colombi, Void statistics and hierarchical scaling in the halo model, MNRAS433, 581 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [32]

    Hurtado-Gil, V

    L. Hurtado-Gil, V. J. Mart´ ınez, P. Arnalte-Mur, M.-J. Pons-Border´ ıa, C. Pareja-Flores, and S. Paredes, The best fit for the observed galaxy counts-in-cell distribu- tion function, A&A601, A40 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [33]

    Hameeda, A

    M. Hameeda, A. Plastino, and M. C. Rocca, General- ized Poisson distributions for systems with two-particle interactions, IOPSciNotes2, 015003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [34]

    [34– 60]

    See Supplemental Material at<TBD>for supporting methods, figures, and tables, which includes Refs. [34– 60]

    work page

  34. [35]

    Ashton, N

    G. Ashton, N. Bernstein, J. Buchner, X. Chen, G. Cs´ anyi, A. Fowlie, F. Feroz, M. Griffiths, W. Han- dley, M. Habeck, E. Higson, M. Hobson, A. Lasenby, D. Parkinson, L. B. P´ artay, M. Pitkin, D. Schneider, J. S. Speagle, L. South, J. Veitch, P. Wacker, D. J. Wales, and D. Yallup, Nested sampling for physical sci- entists, Nat. Rev. Methods Primer 2022 2...

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [36]

    Ashton, M

    G. Ashton, M. H¨ ubner, P. D. Lasky, C. Talbot, K. Ack- ley, S. Biscoveanu, Q. Chu, A. Divakarla, P. J. Easter, B. Goncharov, F. H. Vivanco, J. Harms, M. E. Lower, G. D. Meadors, D. Melchor, E. Payne, M. D. Pitkin, J. Powell, N. Sarin, R. J. E. Smith, and E. Thrane, Bilby: A User-friendly Bayesian Inference Library for Gravitational-wave Astronomy, ApJS24...

    work page 2019

  36. [37]

    J. B. Birks, Scintillations from Organic Crystals: Specific Fluorescence and Relative Response to Different Radia- tions, Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. A64, 874 (1951)

    work page 1951

  37. [38]

    F. D. Brooks, R. W. Pringle, and B. L. Funt, Pulse Shape Discrimination in a Plastic Scintillator, IRE Trans. Nucl. Sci.7, 35 (1960)

    work page 1960

  38. [39]

    J. S. Carlson and P. L. Feng, Melt-cast organic glasses as high-efficiency fast neutron scintillators, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A832, 152 (2016)

    work page 2016

  39. [40]

    Foreman-Mackey, Corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python, J

    D. Foreman-Mackey, Corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python, J. Open Source Softw.1, 24 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [41]

    N. P. Giha, M. L. Ruch, A. D. Fulvio, W. M. Steinberger, and S. A. Pozzi, Readout Electronics of a Handheld Dual Particle Imager, in2017 IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Med. Imaging Conf. NSSMIC(2017) pp. 1–3

    work page 2017

  41. [42]

    N. P. Giha, W. M. Steinberger, L. Q. Nguyen, J. S. Carl- son, P. L. Feng, S. D. Clarke, and S. A. Pozzi, Organic glass scintillator bars with dual-ended readout, Nucl. In- strum. Methods Phys. Res. A1014, 165676 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [43]

    D. E. G. Hare, Computing the Principal Branch of log- Gamma, J. Algorithms25, 221 (1997)

    work page 1997

  43. [44]

    Higson, W

    E. Higson, W. Handley, M. Hobson, and A. Lasenby, Sampling Errors in Nested Sampling Parameter Estima- tion, Bayesian Anal.13, 873 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [45]

    nestcheck: diagnostic tests for nested sampling calculations

    E. Higson, W. Handley, M. Hobson, and A. Lasenby, Nestcheck: Diagnostic tests for nested sampling calcu- lations, MNRAS483, 2044 (2019), arXiv:1804.06406

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2044

  45. [46]

    H¨ unnefeld, R

    M. H¨ unnefeld, R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, C. Alispach, A. A. Alves, N. M. Amin, R. An, K. Andeen, T. An- derson, G. Anton, C. Arg¨ uelles, Y. Ashida, S. Ax- ani, X. Bai, A. V. Balagopal, A. Barbano, S. W. Bar- wick, B. Bastian, V. Basu, S. Baur, R. Bay, J. J. Beatty, K. H. Becker, J. Becker Tjus, C. Bellenghi,...

    work page 2022

  46. [47]

    E. T. Jaynes, Information theory and statistical mechan- ics, Phys. Rev.106, 620 (1957)

    work page 1957

  47. [48]

    J. O. Lloyd-Smith, Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Negative Binomial Dispersion Parameter for Highly Overdispersed Data, with Applications to Infectious Dis- eases, PLOS ONE2, e180 (2007)

    work page 2007

  48. [49]

    Lopez, W

    R. Lopez, W. M. Steinberger, N. Giha, P. Marleau, S. D. Clarke, and S. A. Pozzi, Neutron and gamma imaging using an organic glass scintillator handheld dual parti- cle imager, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A1042, 167407 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [50]

    Lopez, O

    R. Lopez, O. Pakari, C. Ballard, S. Clarke, and S. Pozzi, A simulation pipeline for fast neutron imaging and spec- troscopy using quantified detector attributes, Radiat. Meas.184, 107440 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [51]

    L. Q. Nguyen, G. Gabella, B. L. Goldblum, T. A. Laplace, J. S. Carlson, E. Brubaker, and P. L. Feng, Boron-loaded organic glass scintillators, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A988, 164898 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [52]

    J. K. Polack, M. Flaska, A. Enqvist, C. S. Sosa, C. C. Lawrence, and S. A. Pozzi, An algorithm for charge- integration, pulse-shape discrimination and estimation of neutron/photon misclassification in organic scintillators, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A795, 253 (2015)

    work page 2015

  52. [53]

    M. L. Ruch, P. Marleau, and S. A. Pozzi, Position sen- sitivity within a bar of stilbene coupled to silicon photo- multipliers, in2016 IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Med. Imaging Conf. Room-Temp. Semicond. Detect. Workshop NSSMI- CRTSD(2016) pp. 1–3

    work page 2016

  53. [54]

    DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networks

    D. Salinas, V. Flunkert, J. Gasthaus, and T. Januschowski, DeepAR: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks, Int. J. Forecast. 36, 1181 (2020), arXiv:1704.04110

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  54. [55]

    Serv´ en and C

    D. Serv´ en and C. Brummitt, pyGam: Generalized Addi- tive Models in Python., Zenodo (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [56]

    T. H. Shin, P. L. Feng, J. S. Carlson, S. D. Clarke, and S. A. Pozzi, Measured neutron light-output response for trans-stilbene and small-molecule organic glass scintil- lators, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A939, 36 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [57]

    Skilling, Nested sampling for general Bayesian compu- tation, Bayesian Anal.1, 833 (2006)

    J. Skilling, Nested sampling for general Bayesian compu- tation, Bayesian Anal.1, 833 (2006)

    work page 2006

  57. [58]

    Steinberger, N

    W. Steinberger, N. Giha, M. Hua, S. Clarke, and S. Pozzi, Anisotropic neutron response of trans-stilbene and im- pact on a handheld dual particle imager, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A1003, 165266 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [59]

    W. M. Steinberger, M. L. Ruch, N. Giha, A. D. Ful- vio, P. Marleau, S. D. Clarke, and S. A. Pozzi, Imaging Special Nuclear Material using a Handheld Dual Particle Imager, Sci Rep10, 1855 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [60]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haber- land, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Pe- terson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, ˙I. Po- lat, Y. Feng, E. W. Moore, J. VanderPlas, D. Laxalde, J. Perktold, R. Cimrman, I. Henr...

    work page 2020

  60. [61]

    W. K. Warburton, J. S. Carlson, and P. L. Feng, Or- ganic glass scintillator (OGS) property comparisons to 8 Stilbene, EJ-276 and BC-404, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A1018, 165778 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [62]

    Cloutier, N

    R. Cloutier, N. Astudillo-Defru, R. Doyon, X. Bonfils, J.-M. Almenara, F. Bouchy, X. Delfosse, T. Forveille, C. Lovis, M. Mayor, K. Menou, F. Murgas, F. Pepe, N. C. Santos, S. Udry, and A. W¨ unsche, Confirmation of the radial velocity super-Earth K2-18c with HARPS and CARMENES, A&A621, A49 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [63]

    B. E. Nelson, E. B. Ford, J. Buchner, R. Cloutier, R. F. D´ ıaz, J. P. Faria, N. C. Hara, V. M. Rajpaul, and S. Rukdee, Quantifying the Bayesian Evidence for a Planet in Radial Velocity Data, AJ159, 73 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [64]

    Jeffreys,Theory Of Probability, 2nd ed

    H. Jeffreys,Theory Of Probability, 2nd ed. (Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1948)

    work page 1948

  64. [65]

    D. V. Lindley, On a Measure of the Information Provided by an Experiment, Ann. Math. Stat.27, 986 (1956)

    work page 1956

  65. [66]

    S. P. Luttrell, The use of transinformation in the design of data sampling schemes for inverse problems, Inverse Problems1, 199 (1985)

    work page 1985

  66. [67]

    D. J. C. MacKay, Information-Based Objective Functions for Active Data Selection, Neural Comput4, 590 (1992)

    work page 1992

  67. [68]

    Kullback and R

    S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler, On Information and Suf- ficiency, Ann. Math. Stat.22, 79 (1951)

    work page 1951

  68. [69]

    S. A. Pozzi, E. Padovani, and M. Marseguerra, MCNP- PoliMi: A Monte-Carlo code for correlation measure- ments, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A513, 550 (2003)

    work page 2003

  69. [70]

    Allison, K

    J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, P. Arce, M. Asai, T. Aso, E. Bagli, A. Bagulya, S. Banerjee, G. Bar- rand, B. R. Beck, A. G. Bogdanov, D. Brandt, J. M. C. Brown, H. Burkhardt, Ph. Canal, D. Cano- Ott, S. Chauvie, K. Cho, G. A. P. Cirrone, G. Coop- erman, M. A. Cort´ es-Giraldo, G. Cosmo, G. Cuttone, G. Depaola, L. Desorgher, X. Dong, A. Dotti, V. D....

    work page 2016

  70. [71]

    Ahdida, D

    C. Ahdida, D. Bozzato, D. Calzolari, F. Cerutti, N. Charitonidis, A. Cimmino, A. Coronetti, G. L. D’Alessandro, A. Donadon Servelle, L. S. Esposito, R. Froeschl, R. Garc´ ıa Al´ ıa, A. Gerbershagen, S. Gi- lardoni, D. Horv´ ath, G. Hugo, A. Infantino, V. Kousk- oura, A. Lechner, B. Lefebvre, G. Lerner, M. Magistris, A. Manousos, G. Moryc, F. Ogallar Ruiz,...

    work page 2022