Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 67 references

The paper claims that the quantum trace-anomaly backreaction on Schwarzschild, treated with an order-reduced stress tensor, ends either in a curvature singularity or in a horizonless wormhole throat just outside 2M, depending on whether con

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 17:03 UTC pith:ZO6KZFLS

load-bearing objection A transparent, useful comparison of order-reduced RMV-RSET backreaction, but the claimed endpoint dichotomy sits on an uncontrolled derivative expansion and should be read as provisional. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2512.10710 v2 pith:ZO6KZFLS submitted 2025-12-11 gr-qc hep-th

Macroscopic backreaction of the trace anomaly on classical vacuum backgrounds

Ra\'ul Carballo-Rubio , Francesco Di Filippo , Shinji Mukohyama , Kazumasa Okabayashi This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th MSC 83C4783C5781T20
keywords trace anomalyrenormalized stress-energy tensorbackreactionSchwarzschildBoulware vacuumorder reductionwormhole throatsemiclassical gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Using the trace-anomaly renormalized stress-energy tensor (RMV-RSET) in the Boulware vacuum, the paper asks what quantum vacuum fluctuations do to the Schwarzschild geometry once they are allowed to backreact. Because the full equations are intractable, the authors apply an order-reduction scheme that replaces metric derivatives by polynomials in (h-1), and they compare the scheme with and without a term added to restore covariant conservation. In the non-conserved reduction, the metric function f(r) diverges at r_cr,1 ≈ 2M(1 + K1 sqrt(hbar)/2M) with a divergent Kretschmann scalar, a curvature singularity. Adding the compensatory term moves the endpoint to r_cr,2 ≈ 2M(1 + K2 sqrt(hbar)/2M), where f tends to zero and h diverges but curvature stays finite, with no trapping horizons, which the authors read as strong evidence of a wormhole throat. The wider point is that the order-reduction procedure itself can change regular features into singular ones, so comparing approximations is necessary to identify which semiclassical predictions are real.

Core claim

The central claim is that backreaction of the Boulware-vacuum RMV-RSET on Schwarzschild, computed through a first-order order-reduction scheme, produces two qualitatively different endpoints depending on how conservation is handled. Without compensatory terms, the metric function f(r) diverges at a radius slightly above 2M and the Kretschmann scalar diverges, indicating a curvature singularity at the would-be throat. With compensatory terms added to restore covariant conservation, f(r) tends to zero while h(r) diverges at a slightly smaller radius above 2M, the Kretschmann scalar remains finite, and the null expansions show no trapping horizon, so the endpoint is compatible with a wormhole t

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the RMV-RSET — the renormalized stress-energy tensor built from the conformal trace anomaly via two auxiliary fields satisfying fourth-order equations — combined with first-order order reduction, which converts all metric-derivative terms into polynomials in (h-1). An optional compensatory term adjusts the angular component of the truncated tensor to make it covariantly conserved. The reduction makes the self-consistent backreaction equations tractable, and the comparison between the conserved and non-conserved versions determines whether the endpoint is singular or a throat.

Load-bearing premise

The order-reduction expansion, which assumes h-1 is small and discards higher-order terms, is trusted all the way to the endpoint where h diverges; the authors explicitly grant this the 'benefit of the doubt.'

What would settle it

Solve the full, non-order-reduced semiclassical equations with the RMV-RSET and the same Boulware constants, integrating numerically from large r inward; if the endpoint is a horizon with divergent energy density or a curvature singularity rather than a finite-Kretschmann throat, the paper's throat claim is an artifact. A cheaper check: evaluate the next-order (O(hbar^2)) terms in the derivative expansion at r_cr,2; if they are not small compared with the retained first-order terms, the expansion breaks down before the endpoint.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the throat endpoint is correct, the Boulware vacuum can live on a static, horizonless geometry whose throat sits slightly above the Schwarzschild radius, shifted by an amount of order the Planck length.
  • The solution without compensatory terms shows that order reduction can convert a would-be throat into a curvature singularity, so singular endpoints in reduced-order models are not automatically physical.
  • No trapping horizons appear in either integration, so the backreacted geometry would not possess an event horizon if the throat result holds.
  • The commonly imposed heuristic condition pr = pt fails once backreaction is included, indicating that results relying on that constraint may need revision.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the throat persists in a full non-reduced calculation, static horizonless spacetimes of this type would not emit Hawking radiation in the usual sense; gravitational-wave echoes or altered photon-ring signatures could be observational tests.
  • The Planck-length shift of the would-be horizon means the distinguishing features are in the strong-field near-horizon regime; phenomena like tidal heating or quasi-normal mode spectra might be altered at a level set by the Planck scale rather than by the mass.
  • The same order-reduction-plus-conservation comparison could be applied to Reissner-Nordström or spinning backgrounds; the presence or absence of inner Cauchy horizons would be a useful cross-check of whether the throat endpoint is generic.
  • The paper's explicit caveat that the expansion is being given 'the benefit of the doubt' suggests the next-order terms should be checked; if those terms are large at the endpoint, the wormhole-versus-singularity dichotomy itself could be an artifact.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the backreaction of quantum vacuum fluctuations in the Boulware state on the Schwarzschild geometry, using the Riegert-Mottola-Vaulin renormalized stress-energy tensor (RMV-RSET). Because the RMV-RSET is nonlocal, the authors implement an order-reduction procedure: all metric derivatives are replaced by polynomials in (h-1), Eq. (23), and the auxiliary-field equations become fourth-order ODEs for phi and psi. The resulting order-reduced stress tensor is not conserved; the authors restore conservation by adding a compensatory angular component, Eq. (35). They then integrate the semiclassical Einstein equations inward from the asymptotic region, with and without compensatory terms. Without compensatory terms the metric function f grows and the Kretschmann scalar diverges at r_cr,1 ~ 2M(1+K1 sqrt(hbar)/2M), K1 about 2.16e-2. With compensatory terms f decreases toward zero at r_cr,2 with K2 about 1.12e-2 while the Kretschmann scalar remains finite up to the last grid point, which the authors interpret as evidence for a horizonless wormhole throat. The results are compared with the full RMV-RSET evaluated on the deformed geometries and with AHS-RSET solutions.

Significance. Strengths: the paper supplies explicit order-reduced equations, verifies that the three approximations coincide on Schwarzschild, checks stability of the integration under a different metric ansatz (App. B), reports asymptotic expansions (App. A), and compares several components of the RSET in figures and Table I. This is a useful map of the landscape of order-reduced semiclassical vacuum solutions. The main caveat is that the endpoint classification (singular versus throat) is made in a regime in which the order-reduction expansion is acknowledged to be uncontrolled; the paper's honest caveat does not by itself establish that the geometry near r_cr is physical. The compensatory-term prescription is also non-unique, so the qualitative difference between the two scenarios is at present a feature of the chosen approximation, not a robust prediction.

major comments (4)
  1. [§IV A, Eq. (23); Figs. 1-2] The derivative expansion (23) is the basis of the order-reduced equations, but its expansion parameter is h-1. The endpoint radii r_cr,1 and r_cr,2 are exactly the radii where h diverges (Fig. 2 shows h ~ O(100)-O(1000) there), so (23) is used outside its nominal regime of validity. Concretely, for the metric (20) the actual derivative relation is h' = -h(h-1)/r - 8 pi rho h^2 r (from G^t_t = 8 pi rho), whereas (23) uses only the vacuum term; the omitted term is multiplied by h^2 r and need not be O(hbar) near r_cr. The paper states in Sec. IV A that the OR-RSET 'is not guaranteed to encode the correct physics' and that it is given 'the benefit of the doubt,' but no quantitative bound on the residual is given. Since the singularity/throat distinction is read off at r_cr, this is a load-bearing gap. Please estimate the residual of (23) on the numerical solution or otherwise show that the
  2. [§IV A, Eq. (35)] The compensatory term is introduced only in the angular component, Eq. (35), and is not unique: one could add conserved tensors or distribute the compensation among other components. The two families of solutions are qualitatively different (curvature singularity vs. finite-Kretschmann endpoint), so the choice of prescription is decisive. The paper's argument that non-uniqueness is harmless because it occurs beyond the validity regime is circular in the present context, because the endpoint r_cr is precisely the regime where the difference is read off. To support the wormhole-throat conclusion, the authors should either justify Eq. (35) on independent physical grounds or explicitly treat the two cases as equally ad hoc toy models and soften the conclusions.
  3. [§IV B-C, App. C] The identification of r_cr,2 as a wormhole throat rests on (i) a decreasing tendency of f and a divergent h within the integration domain, (ii) the criterion from Ref. [81] that the energy density should be unbounded on Killing horizons, and (iii) a numerical demonstration on the auxiliary spacetime family (C1) that the OR-RSET with compensatory terms is divergent on such backgrounds. None of these directly determines the nature of the actual endpoint: the integration stops before r_cr, and the auxiliary family is not the self-consistent solution. The conclusion 'This strongly suggests that r=r_cr,2 is a wormhole throat' exceeds the support. Please either construct the two-sided extension / check the flare-out condition explicitly, or state this as a conjecture.
  4. [§IV B] The stated locations r_cr,i = 2M(1+K_i sqrt(hbar)/2M) with K_1 ~ 2.16e-2 and K_2 ~ 1.12e-2 are presented without the supporting numerical fits. Only M=1, hbar=10^-2 is displayed, and no table gives r_cr for several hbar, nor error estimates or dependence on the outer radius r_0. Since the sqrt(hbar) scaling is a quantitative claim, please include the fitting procedure, a range of hbar, and the numerical tolerances used.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§II B, Eq. (18)] The values c_H=-7/20 and d_H=55/84 are inherited from the fit in Ref. [62]. This should be stated as an assumption in the main text; all quantitative endpoint values are conditional on these constants.
  2. [Figs. 1-3] The axis labels in Fig. 3 appear garbled or blank in the compiled manuscript. Please fix the labels and make clear which curves correspond to phi' and psi'.
  3. [Table I] The limiting ratios are described as 'near the points in which numerical simulations break down'; the precise evaluation radius and the sensitivity to the stopping point should be given.
  4. [App. A] The asymptotic coefficients in (A2) are given to many digits without indicating the truncation order used in the numerical integrations; please state the truncation order and a convergence check.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The wormhole-throat interpretation of r_cr,2 is supported by a same-authors' expectation [81] used to exclude the horizon alternative; the core singular-vs-throat numerical difference remains an independent output.

specific steps
  1. uniqueness imported from authors [Sec. IV B, paragraph following the expansion calculations and Eq. (46)]
    "For an adequate RSET approximation, we expect the energy density to be unbounded on Killing horizons [81]. We have confirmed this expectation by performing some auxiliary numerical evaluation of the order-reduced RSET with compensatory terms, as detailed in App. C. This unbounded nature would imply a divergent Kretschmann scalar at r=r_cr,2, which is not compatible with our numerical results. This strongly suggests that r=r_cr,2 is a wormhole throat in the case with compensatory terms."

    Reference [81] is prior work by the same four authors of the present paper. It is used as the decisive criterion for excluding the black-hole-horizon reading of r_cr,2, leaving only the wormhole-throat interpretation. The confirmation in App. C is not independent evidence: it evaluates the same order-reduced RMV-RSET with compensatory terms on auxiliary spacetimes, i.e. it checks the same approximation against itself. Thus the paper's central geometric conclusion ('r=r_cr,2 is a wormhole throat') is partly forced by a self-citation rather than by an externally established theorem. The singular case without compensatory terms does not rely on this step, so the circularity is partial.

full rationale

The main numerical result — that the order-reduced equations without compensatory terms run into a curvature singularity at r_cr,1 while with compensatory terms they approach a finite-Kretschmann endpoint at r_cr,2 — is a genuine output of integrating the stated system of differential equations; it is not merely a renaming of the input. The fitted constants c_H and d_H are inherited from [62], but they are inputs, not quantities that the paper re-predicts, so that does not constitute circularity. The order-reduction expansion (23) being uncontrolled near the endpoint is a substantive correctness risk, but it is not a circularity in the derivation. The main circularity concern is the wormhole-throat claim: the paper excludes the horizon alternative by appealing to an expectation from reference [81], authored by the same group, and the supporting App. C check reuses the same approximation rather than an external benchmark. Because this self-citation is load-bearing only for the throat interpretation, and the singular/throat distinction otherwise has independent numerical content, a moderate score of 4 is appropriate.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on the RMV-RSET (a prior approximation with fitted state constants), on an order-reduction whose validity is not controlled at the endpoint, and on a non-unique conservation-restoring term. No genuinely new entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • c_H = -7/20
    Integration constant in φ(r) selecting the Boulware state; taken from the fit in [62] to the conformal-scalar RSET.
  • d_H = 55/84
    Integration constant in ψ(r); same origin.
  • K1, K2 = K1≈2.16×10^-2, K2≈1.12×10^-2
    Coefficients in the scaling r_cr≈2M(1+K√ℏ/2M); read off from numerical integrations at ℏ=10^-2, M=1. The √ℏ dependence is assumed, not derived.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The RMV-RSET (Eq. (1) with auxiliary fields satisfying Eq. (5)) is an adequate approximation to the exact renormalized stress-energy tensor of conformal fields.
    Used throughout Sec. II; inherited from [61,62] with no independent verification in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The order-reduction expansion (23), expressing metric derivatives as polynomials in (h-1), remains valid up to the endpoint radii where h diverges.
    This is the core technical assumption; the authors acknowledge it may break down and give the OR-RSET 'the benefit of the doubt' (Sec. IV A).
  • ad hoc to paper Adding the compensatory term ΔT^(OR)_θθ defined by Eq. (35) is a legitimate way to restore conservation, despite non-uniqueness.
    Sec. IV A; the non-uniqueness is acknowledged but the numerical conclusion (wormhole throat) depends on this specific choice.
  • domain assumption The energy density of the OR-RSET with compensatory terms is unbounded on Killing horizons (criterion from [81]).
    Used in Sec. IV B to distinguish a throat from a horizon; not proven in this paper (App. C gives only a plausibility argument).
  • domain assumption Asymptotic boundary conditions (A2) obtained by solving the non-OR equations in the asymptotic region are appropriate for the OR equations.
    Appendix A; this assumes the OR and full equations agree asymptotically.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 29634 in / 14476 out tokens · 137540 ms · 2026-08-03T17:03:04.513912+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the backreaction of quantum fields in the Boulware vacuum state on the Schwarzschild geometry, using the Riegert--Mottola--Vaulin renormalized stress-energy tensor derived from the conformal anomaly. An order-reduction procedure is applied to the first order, paying special attention to the conservation of the resulting stress-energy tensor. The results obtained in these different situations are compared between them, and also to recent works in the literature using other approximations for the renormalized stress-energy tensor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.10710 by Francesco Di Filippo, Kazumasa Okabayashi, Ra\'ul Carballo-Rubio, Shinji Mukohyama.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Plots of the metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Plots of the metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Plots of the first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Kretschmann scalar evaluated for the Schwarzschild metric (dashed black line) and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Plot of the energy density as a function of the radius. The dashed black line indicates any [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Plot of the radial pressure as a function of the radius. Different lines have the same meaning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Plot of the tangential pressure as a function of the radius. Different lines have the same [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Plot of the function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Plot of the function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Logarithmic plots of the energy density obtained from order-reduced RMV-RSET [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2, 1984

    1984

  2. [2]

    Mukhanov and S

    V. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki, Introduction to quantum effects in gravity. Cambridge University Press, 6, 2007

    2007

  3. [3]

    Rovelli, Quantum gravity

    C. Rovelli, Quantum gravity. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Univ. Pr., Cambridge, UK, 2004

    2004

  4. [4]

    Oriti, Approaches to quantum gravity: Toward a new understanding of space, time and matter

    D. Oriti, Approaches to quantum gravity: Toward a new understanding of space, time and matter. Cambridge University Press, 3, 2009

    2009

  5. [5]

    R. M. Wald, General Relativity. Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984

    1984

  6. [6]

    Notes on semiclassical gravity,

    T. P. Singh and T. Padmanabhan, “Notes on semiclassical gravity,” Annals Phys.196 (1989) 296–344

    1989

  7. [7]

    Black hole explosions,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black hole explosions,” Nature248(1974) 30–31. 28

    1974

  8. [8]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,” Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199–220. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  9. [9]

    Experimental black hole evaporation,

    W. G. Unruh, “Experimental black hole evaporation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.46(1981) 1351–1353

    1981

  10. [10]

    The Internal geometry of an evaporating black hole,

    R. Parentani and T. Piran, “The Internal geometry of an evaporating black hole,” Phys. Rev. Lett.73(1994) 2805–2808,arXiv:hep-th/9405007

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  11. [11]

    Stellar equilibrium in semiclassical gravity,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, “Stellar equilibrium in semiclassical gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120no. 6, (2018) 061102,arXiv:1706.05379 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Static Black Hole and Vacuum Energy: Thin Shell and Incompressible Fluid,

    P.-M. Ho and Y. Matsuo, “Static Black Hole and Vacuum Energy: Thin Shell and Incompressible Fluid,” JHEP03(2018) 096,arXiv:1710.10390 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Semiclassical constant-density spheres in a regularized Polyakov approximation,

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Semiclassical constant-density spheres in a regularized Polyakov approximation,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 8, (2021) 084071, arXiv:2105.11261 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Semiclassical relativistic stars,

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Semiclassical relativistic stars,” Sci. Rep.12no. 1, (2022) 15958,arXiv:2110.15808 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Ultracompact horizonless objects in order-reduced semiclassical gravity,

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Ultracompact horizonless objects in order-reduced semiclassical gravity,” Phys. Rev. D109no. 10, (2024) 104056, arXiv:2310.12668 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Semiclassical zero-temperature corrections to Schwarzschild spacetime and holography,

    A. Fabbri, S. Farese, J. Navarro-Salas, G. J. Olmo, and H. Sanchis-Alepuz, “Semiclassical zero-temperature corrections to Schwarzschild spacetime and holography,” Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 104023,arXiv:hep-th/0512167

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  17. [17]

    Static Black Holes With Back Reaction From Vacuum Energy,

    P.-M. Ho and Y. Matsuo, “Static Black Holes With Back Reaction From Vacuum Energy,” Class. Quant. Grav.35no. 6, (2018) 065012,arXiv:1703.08662 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    The fate of black hole horizons in semiclassical gravity,

    C. Berthiere, D. Sarkar, and S. N. Solodukhin, “The fate of black hole horizons in semiclassical gravity,” Phys. Lett. B786(2018) 21–27,arXiv:1712.09914 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    On the Near-Horizon Geometry of an Evaporating Black Hole,

    P.-M. Ho and Y. Matsuo, “On the Near-Horizon Geometry of an Evaporating Black Hole,” JHEP07(2018) 047,arXiv:1804.04821 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Schwarzschild geometry counterpart in semiclassical gravity,

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Schwarzschild geometry counterpart in semiclassical gravity,” Phys. Rev. D101no. 6, (2020) 064059, arXiv:1911.03213 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Reissner–Nordstr¨ om geometry counterpart in semiclassical gravity,

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Reissner–Nordstr¨ om geometry counterpart in semiclassical gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav.38no. 11, (2021) 115014, 29 arXiv:2102.03544 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Asymptotically flat vacuum solutions in order-reduced semiclassical gravity,

    J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Asymptotically flat vacuum solutions in order-reduced semiclassical gravity,” Phys. Rev. D107no. 8, (2023) 085005, arXiv:2212.09375 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Quantum corrections to the Schwarzschild metric from vacuum polarization,

    P. Beltr´ an-Palau, A. del R ´ ıo, and J. Navarro-Salas, “Quantum corrections to the Schwarzschild metric from vacuum polarization,” Phys. Rev. D107no. 8, (2023) 085023, arXiv:2212.08089 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Arrechea, Hydrostatic equilibrium in the semiclassical approximation

    J. Arrechea, Hydrostatic equilibrium in the semiclassical approximation. PhD thesis, Universidad de Granada, 2023

    2023

  25. [25]

    Tests for the existence of black holes through gravitational wave echoes,

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, “Tests for the existence of black holes through gravitational wave echoes,” Nature Astron.1no. 9, (2017) 586–591,arXiv:1709.01525 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Seeking observational evidence for the formation of trapping horizons in astrophysical black holes,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, P. Kumar, and W. Lu, “Seeking observational evidence for the formation of trapping horizons in astrophysical black holes,” Phys. Rev. D97no. 12, (2018) 123012, arXiv:1804.00663 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    The stochastic gravitational-wave background in the absence of horizons,

    E. Barausse, R. Brito, V. Cardoso, I. Dvorkin, and P. Pani, “The stochastic gravitational-wave background in the absence of horizons,” Class. Quant. Grav.35no. 20, (2018) 20LT01,arXiv:1805.08229 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    Phenomenological aspects of black holes beyond general relativity,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, “Phenomenological aspects of black holes beyond general relativity,” Phys. Rev. D98no. 12, (2018) 124009, arXiv:1809.08238 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, “Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,” Living Rev. Rel.22no. 1, (2019) 4,arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Distinguishing black holes from horizonless objects through the excitation of resonances during inspiral,

    V. Cardoso, A. del Rio, and M. Kimura, “Distinguishing black holes from horizonless objects through the excitation of resonances during inspiral,” Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 084046, arXiv:1907.01561 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 101, 069902 (2020)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    How does a dark compact object ringdown?,

    E. Maggio, L. Buoninfante, A. Mazumdar, and P. Pani, “How does a dark compact object ringdown?,” Phys. Rev. D102no. 6, (2020) 064053,arXiv:2006.14628 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Extreme mass-ratio inspirals around a spinning horizonless compact object,

    E. Maggio, M. van de Meent, and P. Pani, “Extreme mass-ratio inspirals around a spinning horizonless compact object,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 10, (2021) 104026,arXiv:2106.07195 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Constraints on horizonless 30 objects after the EHT observation of Sagittarius A*,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, “Constraints on horizonless 30 objects after the EHT observation of Sagittarius A*,” JCAP08no. 08, (2022) 055, arXiv:2205.13555 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Toward very large baseline interferometry observations of black hole structure,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, V. Cardoso, and Z. Younsi, “Toward very large baseline interferometry observations of black hole structure,” Phys. Rev. D106no. 8, (2022) 084038, arXiv:2208.00704 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Maggio, Probing new physics on the horizon of black holes with gravitational waves

    E. Maggio, Probing new physics on the horizon of black holes with gravitational waves. PhD thesis, Rome U., 2022.arXiv:2211.16900 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Constraints on thermalizing surfaces from infrared observations of supermassive black holes,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, “Constraints on thermalizing surfaces from infrared observations of supermassive black holes,” JCAP11(2023) 041, arXiv:2306.17480 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Hawking-like radiation from evolving black holes and compact horizonless objects,

    C. Barcel´ o, S. Liberati, S. Sonego, and M. Visser, “Hawking-like radiation from evolving black holes and compact horizonless objects,” Journal of High Energy Physics2011no. 2, (Feb, 2011) 1–30.https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2011)003

    doi:10.1007/jhep02(2011)003 2011

  38. [38]

    Particle creation in gravitational collapse to a horizonless compact object,

    T. Harada, V. Cardoso, and D. Miyata, “Particle creation in gravitational collapse to a horizonless compact object,” Phys. Rev. D99no. 4, (2019) 044039,arXiv:1811.05179 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Bursts of particle creation in gravitational collapse to a horizonless compact object,

    T. Kokubu and T. Harada, “Bursts of particle creation in gravitational collapse to a horizonless compact object,” Phys. Rev. D100no. 8, (2019) 084028,arXiv:1905.07981 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Robustness of particle creation in the formation of a compact object,

    K. Okabayashi, T. Harada, and K.-i. Nakao, “Robustness of particle creation in the formation of a compact object,” PTEP2022no. 2, (2022) 023E02,arXiv:2107.05260 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Radiative gravastar with gibbons-hawking temperature,

    K.-i. Nakao, K. Okabayashi, and T. Harada, “Radiative gravastar with gibbons-hawking temperature,” Phys. Rev. D106(Nov, 2022) 105006. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.105006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.105006 2022

  42. [42]

    Radiative gravastar with thermal spectrum: Sudden vacuum condensation without gravitational collapse,

    K.-i. Nakao, K. Okabayashi, and T. Harada, “Radiative gravastar with thermal spectrum: Sudden vacuum condensation without gravitational collapse,” Phys. Rev. D107(Apr, 2023) 084036.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.084036

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.084036 2023

  43. [43]

    Boulware vacuum vs regularity: Thoughts on anomaly-induced effective action,

    K. Numajiri, K. Okabayashi, and S. Mukohyama, “Boulware vacuum vs regularity: Thoughts on anomaly-induced effective action,” Phys. Rev. D111(Apr, 2025) 085024. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.085024. 31

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.085024 2025

  44. [44]

    Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics,

    R. Carballo-Rubio et al., “Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics,” JCAP 05(2025) 003,arXiv:2501.05505 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation,

    C. Bambi et al., “Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation,”arXiv:2505.09014 [gr-qc]. [46]LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo CollaborationCollaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(Feb, 2016) 061102.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102. [47]...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  46. [61]

    A non-local action for the trace anomaly,

    R. J. Riegert, “A non-local action for the trace anomaly,” Physics Letters B134no. 1-2, (Jan., 1984) 56–60

    1984

  47. [62]

    Macroscopic Effects of the Quantum Trace Anomaly,

    E. Mottola and R. Vaulin, “Macroscopic Effects of the Quantum Trace Anomaly,” Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 064004,arXiv:gr-qc/0604051

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  48. [63]

    Anomaly induced effective actions and Hawking radiation,

    R. Balbinot, A. Fabbri, and I. L. Shapiro, “Anomaly induced effective actions and Hawking radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 1494–1497,arXiv:hep-th/9904074

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  49. [64]

    Vacuum polarization in Schwarzschild space-time by anomaly induced effective actions,

    R. Balbinot, A. Fabbri, and I. L. Shapiro, “Vacuum polarization in Schwarzschild space-time by anomaly induced effective actions,” Nucl. Phys. B559(1999) 301–319, arXiv:hep-th/9904162

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  50. [65]

    The Trace Anomaly and Massless Scalar Degrees of Freedom in Gravity,

    M. Giannotti and E. Mottola, “The Trace Anomaly and Massless Scalar Degrees of Freedom in Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 045014,arXiv:0812.0351 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [66]

    New Horizons in Gravity: The Trace Anomaly, Dark Energy and Condensate 33 Stars,

    E. Mottola, “New Horizons in Gravity: The Trace Anomaly, Dark Energy and Condensate 33 Stars,” Acta Phys. Polon. B41(2010) 2031–2162,arXiv:1008.5006 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  52. [67]

    Scalar Gravitational Waves in the Effective Theory of Gravity,

    E. Mottola, “Scalar Gravitational Waves in the Effective Theory of Gravity,” JHEP07 (2017) 043,arXiv:1606.09220 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 107 (2017)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [68]

    The effective theory of gravity and dynamical vacuum energy,

    E. Mottola, “The effective theory of gravity and dynamical vacuum energy,” JHEP11 (2022) 037,arXiv:2205.04703 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  54. [69]

    A new gravitational action for the trace anomaly,

    G. Gabadadze, “A new gravitational action for the trace anomaly,” Phys. Lett. B843 (2023) 138031,arXiv:2301.13265 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  55. [70]

    The Stability of flat space, semiclassical gravity, and higher derivatives,

    J. Z. Simon, “The Stability of flat space, semiclassical gravity, and higher derivatives,” Phys. Rev. D43(1991) 3308–3316

    1991

  56. [71]

    Einstein equation with quantum corrections reduced to second order,

    L. Parker and J. Z. Simon, “Einstein equation with quantum corrections reduced to second order,” Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 1339–1355,arXiv:gr-qc/9211002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  57. [72]

    Stress Tensor from the Trace Anomaly in Reissner-Nordstrom Spacetimes,

    P. R. Anderson, E. Mottola, and R. Vaulin, “Stress Tensor from the Trace Anomaly in Reissner-Nordstrom Spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 124028,arXiv:0707.3751 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  58. [73]

    The Einstein tensor and its generalizations,

    D. Lovelock, “The Einstein tensor and its generalizations,” J. Math. Phys.12(1971) 498–501

    1971

  59. [74]

    The four-dimensionality of space and the einstein tensor,

    D. Lovelock, “The four-dimensionality of space and the einstein tensor,” J. Math. Phys.13 (1972) 874–876

    1972

  60. [75]

    Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse,

    C. W. Misner and D. H. Sharp, “Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse,” Phys. Rev.136(1964) B571–B576

    1964

  61. [76]

    Observer Time as a Coordinate in Relativistic Spherical Hydrodynamics,

    W. C. Hernandez and C. W. Misner, “Observer Time as a Coordinate in Relativistic Spherical Hydrodynamics,” Astrophys. J.143(1966) 452

    1966

  62. [77]

    Stress - energy tensor of quantized scalar fields in static spherically symmetric space-times,

    P. R. Anderson, W. A. Hiscock, and D. A. Samuel, “Stress - energy tensor of quantized scalar fields in static spherically symmetric space-times,” Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 4337–4358

    1995

  63. [78]

    Inner horizon instability via the trace anomaly effective action,

    J. Arrechea, G. Neri, and S. Liberati, “Inner horizon instability via the trace anomaly effective action,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 8, (2025) 084036,arXiv:2411.14964 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  64. [79]

    K. A. Bronnikov and S. G. Rubin, Black Holes, Cosmology and Extra Dimensions. WSP, 2012

    2012

  65. [80]

    Novel black-bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure,

    F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, M. V. de Sousa Silva, A. Simpson, and M. Visser, “Novel black-bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure,” Phys. Rev. D103no. 8, (2021) 084052,arXiv:2009.12057 [gr-qc]. 34

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  66. [81]

    Imprints of quantum vacuum fluctuations on the gravitational field of a spherical mass,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Mukohyama, and K. Okabayashi, “Imprints of quantum vacuum fluctuations on the gravitational field of a spherical mass,”arXiv:2509.10667 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [82]

    Generic wormhole throats,

    M. Visser and D. Hochberg, “Generic wormhole throats,” Annals Israel Phys. Soc.13(1997) 249,arXiv:gr-qc/9710001. 35

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997