Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 5 cited by

The spectrum of Feynman-integral geometries at two loops

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-16 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two-loop Feynman integrals in four dimensions reduce to Riemann spheres, elliptic curves, hyperelliptic curves of genus 2 and 3, K3 surfaces, and one rationalizable Del Pezzo surface of degree 2.

desk verdict This paper enumerates the geometries for two-loop Feynman integrals across 79 topologies and flags a Del Pezzo surface of degree 2, but the completeness claim rests on an unverified basis and the reach of leading singularities. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.13794 v3 submitted 2025-12-15 hep-th hep-ph

Piotr Bargiela , Hjalte Frellesvig , Robin Marzucca , Roger Morales , Florian Seefeld , Matthias Wilhelm , Tong-Zhi Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords Feynmanintegralstwo-loopleadingsingularitiesBaikovrepresentationellipticcurvesK3surfacesDelPezzosurfacequantumfieldtheory
checked against alexander_duality_circle_linking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper classifies the geometric structures that appear in two-loop Feynman integrals with quadratic propagators in four-dimensional quantum field theory. Using a finite basis of 79 independent topologies in the 't Hooft-Veltman scheme, the authors compute leading singularities via the loop-by-loop Baikov representation for generic masses and momenta. This analysis yields the Riemann sphere along with elliptic curves, hyperelliptic curves of genus 2 and 3, K3 surfaces, and a smooth non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2 that is rationalizable to a genus-3 curve. These geometries fix the space of functions needed for all two-loop calculations, including those in the Standard Model.

What carries the argument

The loop-by-loop Baikov representation applied to leading singularities of integrals belonging to a finite basis of 79 topologies.

What would settle it

Finding even one two-loop integral whose leading singularity defines an algebraic variety outside the listed types, such as a curve of genus 4 or a non-rationalizable surface of degree higher than 2, would falsify the claimed completeness of the classification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We provide a complete classification of the Feynman-integral geometries at two-loop order in four-dimensional Quantum Field Theory with standard quadratic propagators. We consider a finite basis of integrals in the 't Hooft-Veltman scheme belonging to 79 independent topologies. Analyzing the leading singularities using the loop-by-loop Baikov representation for generic masses and momenta reveals Riemann spheres, elliptic curves, hyperelliptic curves of genus 2 and 3, K3 surfaces, and a smooth non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2 that is rationalizable, resulting in a curve of geometric genus 3. These geometries determine the space of functions relevant for Quantum Field Theories at 2

Load-bearing premise

The loop-by-loop Baikov representation applied to leading singularities for generic masses and momenta fully determines the geometry of every integral in the chosen finite basis of 79 topologies, and that this basis is exhaustive for all two-loop sectors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The functional space required for two-loop quantum field theory calculations is spanned by integrals whose leading singularities lie on one of the identified varieties.
  • All two-loop integrals in the chosen basis fall into the Riemann sphere, elliptic, hyperelliptic genus 2 or 3, K3, or rationalizable Del Pezzo categories.
  • The rationalizability of the Del Pezzo surface reduces its contribution to a genus-3 curve, simplifying the associated master integrals.
  • Two-loop calculations in the Standard Model are governed by these same geometric types.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The classification supplies concrete targets for constructing analytic continuation algorithms that handle each geometry separately rather than a single generic method.
  • Extending the same loop-by-loop Baikov technique to three-loop sectors could map the next layer of geometries and reveal whether K3 surfaces persist or give way to higher-dimensional Calabi-Yau varieties.
  • The appearance of a rationalizable Del Pezzo surface suggests that certain apparently transcendental integrals may admit algebraic reductions once the geometry is exploited.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to deliver a complete classification of the algebraic geometries of two-loop Feynman integrals in four-dimensional QFT with quadratic propagators. It restricts attention to a finite basis of 79 independent topologies in the 't Hooft-Veltman scheme and extracts their leading singularities via the loop-by-loop Baikov representation at generic masses and momenta, reporting the appearance of the Riemann sphere, elliptic curves, hyperelliptic curves of genus 2 and 3, K3 surfaces, and a smooth non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2 that reduces to a genus-3 curve.

Significance. If the 79-topology basis is exhaustive and the leading-singularity loci coincide with the full Picard-Fuchs varieties, the classification would delineate the precise function spaces required for all two-loop calculations in the Standard Model and related theories, thereby guiding the construction of canonical bases and differential equations for multi-loop amplitudes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (basis construction): the claim that the chosen set of 79 topologies exhausts every two-loop sector with quadratic propagators is asserted without an explicit enumeration, generation algorithm, or reference to a prior exhaustive list; this is load-bearing for the 'complete classification' statement.
  2. [§3] §3 (leading-singularity analysis): the assertion that loop-by-loop Baikov leading singularities evaluated at generic masses and momenta fully determine the algebraic geometry of each integral (including agreement with the Picard-Fuchs variety of the uncut integral) lacks a concrete verification step or counter-example check; without this, the listed spectrum (Riemann sphere through Del Pezzo) may be incomplete.
  3. [§4] §4 (Del Pezzo surface): the identification of a smooth non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2 and its rationalizability to a genus-3 curve requires an explicit equation or maximal-cut computation showing that no additional singularities or degenerations arise within the 79 sectors.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'standard quadratic propagators' without a one-sentence definition; this should be supplied in the introduction for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. [Appendix] A compact table or appendix listing all 79 topologies (with propagator counts, external legs, and mass assignments) would improve reproducibility and allow direct cross-checks of the geometry assignments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (basis construction): the claim that the chosen set of 79 topologies exhausts every two-loop sector with quadratic propagators is asserted without an explicit enumeration, generation algorithm, or reference to a prior exhaustive list; this is load-bearing for the 'complete classification' statement.

    Authors: The 79 topologies arise from a systematic enumeration of all two-loop diagrams with quadratic propagators and up to four external legs in the 't Hooft-Veltman scheme, followed by reduction to independent sectors via integration-by-parts identities. Section 2 outlines this construction, but we agree that greater transparency is needed. In the revision we will add a reference to standard catalogues of two-loop topologies in the literature and include a concise description of the generation algorithm, thereby supporting the completeness claim without altering the count. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (leading-singularity analysis): the assertion that loop-by-loop Baikov leading singularities evaluated at generic masses and momenta fully determine the algebraic geometry of each integral (including agreement with the Picard-Fuchs variety of the uncut integral) lacks a concrete verification step or counter-example check; without this, the listed spectrum (Riemann sphere through Del Pezzo) may be incomplete.

    Authors: The loop-by-loop Baikov representation extracts leading singularities whose loci define the algebraic geometry, and this matches the Picard-Fuchs variety for generic kinematics by construction, as established in prior work on Feynman integrals. We performed explicit checks for representative integrals in each geometry class (Riemann sphere, elliptic, genus-2/3 hyperelliptic, K3). In the revision we will add a short verification subsection in §3 containing one concrete example per geometry class demonstrating agreement with the expected variety. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [§4] §4 (Del Pezzo surface): the identification of a smooth non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2 and its rationalizability to a genus-3 curve requires an explicit equation or maximal-cut computation showing that no additional singularities or degenerations arise within the 79 sectors.

    Authors: Section 4 derives the Del Pezzo surface directly from the maximal cut of the relevant topology via the Baikov representation, producing a smooth quadratic hypersurface of degree 2 in projective space at generic kinematics. The rationalization to a genus-3 curve follows from the standard birational equivalence for such surfaces. In the revision we will insert the explicit defining polynomial equation and confirm that the generic-parameter computation introduces no further singularities or degenerations within the 79 sectors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: direct classification from leading singularities

full rationale

The paper performs an explicit classification of two-loop Feynman-integral geometries by computing leading singularities via the loop-by-loop Baikov representation on a stated finite basis of 79 topologies for generic masses and momenta. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the listed geometries (Riemann sphere through Del Pezzo) are outputs of that singularity analysis rather than inputs. The exhaustiveness claim for the 79-topology basis is an external assertion about the space of integrals, not a definitional tautology inside the derivation itself. This is the normal non-circular outcome for a computational classification paper.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard 't Hooft-Veltman dimensional regularization scheme and the loop-by-loop Baikov representation; no new free parameters or postulated entities are introduced.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The 't Hooft-Veltman scheme with D-dimensional loop momenta and four-dimensional external momenta is the appropriate regularization for classifying two-loop geometries.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the scheme employed.
  • domain assumption Leading singularities extracted via the loop-by-loop Baikov representation determine the algebraic geometry of each integral for generic masses and momenta.
    The method used to obtain the listed curves and surfaces.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The spectrum of Feynman-integral geometries at two loops." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2512.13794

@misc{pith2026251213794,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The spectrum of Feynman-integral geometries at two loops},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2512.13794}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.13794}
}
abstract

We provide a complete classification of the Feynman-integral geometries at two-loop order in four-dimensional Quantum Field Theory with standard quadratic propagators. Concretely, we consider a finite basis of integrals in the 't Hooft--Veltman scheme, i.e. with $D$-dimensional loop momenta and four-dimensional external momenta, which belong to 79 independent topologies, or sectors. Then, we analyze the leading singularities of the integrals in those sectors for generic values of the masses and momenta, using the loop-by-loop Baikov representation. Aside from the Riemann sphere, we find that elliptic curves, hyperelliptic curves of genus 2 and 3 as well as K3 surfaces occur. Moreover, we find a smooth and non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2, a particular Fano variety known to be rationalizable, resulting in a curve of geometric genus 3. These geometries determine the space of functions relevant for Quantum Field Theories at two-loop order, including in the Standard Model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We analyze the leading singularities of the integrals in those sectors for generic values of the masses and momenta, using the loop-by-loop Baikov representation. Aside from the Riemann sphere, we find that elliptic curves, hyperelliptic curves of genus 2 and 3 as well as K3 surfaces occur. Moreover, we find a smooth and non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2...

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    the configuration matrix... satisfies the CY condition (3.9) for a K3 surface... After the rationalization, the resulting geometry is a curve of geometric genus 3

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Analytic result of a three-loop integral family in the Higgs decay to four massive bottom quarks

    hep-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    Analytic master-integral results through O(ε²) are obtained for a three-loop family containing elliptic and K3 geometries by building and solving a mixed-sector ε-factorized differential equation.

  2. First look at the evaluation of two-loop Feynman integrals for radiative return processes

    hep-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Planar two-loop four-point master integrals for massive radiative-return QED, including elliptic and nested-root sectors, are reduced to polynomial-in-ε differential equations that evaluate stably in the physical region.

  3. Solution of Canonical Differential Equations for Integrals on Arbitrary Geometries

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A strategy is introduced to solve canonical differential equations for Feynman master integrals on arbitrary geometries by reducing numerical evaluation to an enlarged system of rational differential equations.

  4. IterInt: Evaluating iterated integrals via differential equations

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    IterInt package evaluates iterated integrals by transforming them into solvable differential equation systems with built-in regularization.

  5. From geometry to phenomenology

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    Feynman integrals with mixed geometries (K3 surfaces, curves, points) can be computed more efficiently by extracting and using their algebraic geometric properties.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

153 extracted references · 153 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. Andersen et al.,Les Houches 2023: Physics at TeV Colliders: Standard Model Working Group Report, inPhysics of the TeV Scale and Beyond the Standard Model: Intensifying the Quest for New Physics, 6, 2024 [2406.00708]

    work page arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    A. Huss, J. Huston, S. Jones, M. Pellen and R. R¨ ontsch,Les Houches 2023 – Physics at TeV Colliders: Report on the Standard Model Precision Wishlist, 2504.06689

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Papathanasiou, S

    G. Papathanasiou, S. Weinzierl, K. Wu and Y. Zhang,Rationalisation of multiple square roots in Feynman integrals,JHEP05(2025) 078 [2501.07490]

    work page arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Chen,Iterated path integrals,Bull

    K.-T. Chen,Iterated path integrals,Bull. Am. Math. Soc.83(1977) 831

    work page 1977

  5. [5]

    Goncharov,Geometry of Configurations, Polylogarithms, and Motivic Cohomology,Adv

    A.B. Goncharov,Geometry of Configurations, Polylogarithms, and Motivic Cohomology,Adv. Math.114(1995) 197

    work page 1995

  6. [6]

    Bourjaily et al.,Functions Beyond Multiple Polylogarithms for Precision Collider Physics, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.07088]

    J.L. Bourjaily, J. Broedel, E. Chaubey, C. Duhr, H. Frellesvig, M. Hidding, R. Marzucca, A.J. McLeod, M. Spradlin, L. Tancredi, C. Vergu, M. Volk, A. Volovich, M. von Hippel, S. Weinzierl, M. Wilhelm and C. Zhang,Functions Beyond Multiple Polylogarithms for Precision Collider Physics, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.07088]

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Sabry,Fourth order spectral functions for the electron propagator,Nucl

    A. Sabry,Fourth order spectral functions for the electron propagator,Nucl. Phys. 33(1962) 401

    work page 1962

  8. [8]

    Two-loop two-point functions with masses: asymptotic expansions and Taylor series, in any dimension

    D.J. Broadhurst, J. Fleischer and O.V. Tarasov,Two loop two point functions with masses: Asymptotic expansions and Taylor series, in any dimension,Z. Phys. C 60(1993) 287 [hep-ph/9304303]. – 48 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 1993

Show all 153 references
  1. [9]

    Laporta and E

    S. Laporta and E. Remiddi,Analytic treatment of the two loop equal mass sunrise graph,Nucl. Phys. B704(2005) 349 [hep-ph/0406160]

    2005 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Caron-Huot and K.J

    S. Caron-Huot and K.J. Larsen,Uniqueness of two-loop master contours,JHEP10 (2012) 026 [1205.0801]

    2012

  3. [11]

    Adams, C

    L. Adams, C. Bogner and S. Weinzierl,The two-loop sunrise graph with arbitrary masses,J. Math. Phys.54(2013) 052303 [1302.7004]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bloch and P

    S. Bloch and P. Vanhove,The elliptic dilogarithm for the sunset graph,J. Number Theor.148(2015) 328 [1309.5865]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Adams, C

    L. Adams, C. Bogner and S. Weinzierl,The two-loop sunrise graph in two space-time dimensions with arbitrary masses in terms of elliptic dilogarithms,J. Math. Phys.55(2014) 102301 [1405.5640]

    2014 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Remiddi and L

    E. Remiddi and L. Tancredi,Differential equations and dispersion relations for Feynman amplitudes. The two-loop massive sunrise and the kite integral,Nucl. Phys. B907(2016) 400 [1602.01481]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Adams, C

    L. Adams, C. Bogner, A. Schweitzer and S. Weinzierl,The kite integral to all orders in terms of elliptic polylogarithms,J. Math. Phys.57(2016) 122302 [1607.01571]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Broedel, C

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat and L. Tancredi,Elliptic polylogarithms and iterated integrals on elliptic curves II: an application to the sunrise integral,Phys. Rev. D 97(2018) 116009 [1712.07095]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Kristensson, M

    A. Kristensson, M. Wilhelm and C. Zhang,Elliptic Double Box and Symbology Beyond Polylogarithms,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 251603 [2106.14902]

    2021

  10. [18]

    Giroux and A

    M. Giroux and A. Pokraka,Loop-by-loop differential equations for dual (elliptic) Feynman integrals,JHEP03(2023) 155 [2210.09898]

    2023

  11. [19]

    Morales, A

    R. Morales, A. Spiering, M. Wilhelm, Q. Yang and C. Zhang,Bootstrapping Elliptic Feynman Integrals Using Schubert Analysis,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 041601 [2212.09762]

    2023

  12. [20]

    McLeod, R

    A. McLeod, R. Morales, M. von Hippel, M. Wilhelm and C. Zhang,An infinite family of elliptic ladder integrals,JHEP05(2023) 236 [2301.07965]

    2023

  13. [21]

    Stawinski,An elliptic one-loop amplitude in anti-de-Sitter space,JHEP02 (2024) 208 [2309.15059]

    S.F. Stawinski,An elliptic one-loop amplitude in anti-de-Sitter space,JHEP02 (2024) 208 [2309.15059]

    2024

  14. [22]

    Giroux, A

    M. Giroux, A. Pokraka, F. Porkert and Y. Sohnle,The soaring kite: a tale of two punctured tori,JHEP05(2024) 239 [2401.14307]

    2024

  15. [23]

    Spiering, M

    A. Spiering, M. Wilhelm and C. Zhang,All Planar Two-Loop Amplitudes in Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 071602 [2406.15549]

    2025

  16. [24]

    Huang and Y

    R. Huang and Y. Zhang,On Genera of Curves from High-loop Generalized Unitarity Cuts,JHEP04(2013) 080 [1302.1023]. – 49 –

    2013 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Marzucca, A.J

    R. Marzucca, A.J. McLeod, B. Page, S. P¨ ogel and S. Weinzierl,Genus drop in hyperelliptic Feynman integrals,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L031901 [2307.11497]

    2024

  18. [26]

    C. Duhr, F. Porkert and S.F. Stawinski,Canonical differential equations beyond genus one,JHEP02(2025) 014 [2412.02300]

    2025

  19. [27]

    Primo and L

    A. Primo and L. Tancredi,Maximal cuts and differential equations for Feynman integrals. An application to the three-loop massive banana graph,Nucl. Phys. B 921(2017) 316 [1704.05465]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bourjaily, Y.-H

    J.L. Bourjaily, Y.-H. He, A.J. Mcleod, M. Von Hippel and M. Wilhelm,Traintracks through Calabi-Yau Manifolds: Scattering Amplitudes beyond Elliptic Polylogarithms,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 071603 [1805.09326]

    2018 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Bourjaily, A.J

    J.L. Bourjaily, A.J. McLeod, M. von Hippel and M. Wilhelm,Bounded Collection of Feynman Integral Calabi-Yau Geometries,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 031601 [1810.07689]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    B¨ onisch, C

    K. B¨ onisch, C. Duhr, F. Fischbach, A. Klemm and C. Nega,Feynman integrals in dimensional regularization and extensions of Calabi-Yau motives,JHEP09(2022) 156 [2108.05310]

    2022

  23. [31]

    Broedel, C

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr and N. Matthes,Meromorphic modular forms and the three-loop equal-mass banana integral,JHEP02(2022) 184 [2109.15251]

    2022

  24. [32]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega and F. Porkert,Yangian-Invariant Fishnet Integrals in Two Dimensions as Volumes of Calabi-Yau Varieties,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 041602 [2209.05291]

    2023

  25. [33]

    Lairez and P

    P. Lairez and P. Vanhove,Algorithms for minimal Picard–Fuchs operators of Feynman integrals,Lett. Math. Phys.113(2023) 37 [2209.10962]

    2023

  26. [34]

    P¨ ogel, X

    S. P¨ ogel, X. Wang and S. Weinzierl,Bananas of equal mass: any loop, any order in the dimensional regularisation parameter,JHEP04(2023) 117 [2212.08908]

    2023

  27. [35]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, C. Nega and L. Tancredi,The ice cone family and iterated integrals for Calabi-Yau varieties,JHEP02(2023) 228 [2212.09550]

    2023

  28. [36]

    Q. Cao, S. He and Y. Tang,Cutting the traintracks: Cauchy, Schubert and Calabi-Yau,JHEP04(2023) 072 [2301.07834]

    2023

  29. [37]

    Doran, A

    C.F. Doran, A. Harder, P. Vanhove and E. Pichon-Pharabod,Motivic Geometry of two-Loop Feynman Integrals,Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.75(2024) 901 [2302.14840]

    2024

  30. [38]

    McLeod and M

    A.J. McLeod and M. von Hippel,Traintracks All the Way Down,2306.11780

  31. [39]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega and F. Porkert,The Basso-Dixon formula and Calabi-Yau geometry,JHEP03(2024) 177 [2310.08625]

    2024

  32. [40]

    Frellesvig, R

    H. Frellesvig, R. Morales and M. Wilhelm,Calabi-Yau Meets Gravity: A Calabi-Yau Threefold at Fifth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 201602 [2312.11371]. – 50 –

    2024

  33. [41]

    Klemm, C

    A. Klemm, C. Nega, B. Sauer and J. Plefka,Calabi-Yau periods for black hole scattering in classical general relativity,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 124046 [2401.07899]

    2024

  34. [42]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega and F. Porkert,Geometry from integrability: multi-leg fishnet integrals in two dimensions,JHEP07(2024) 008 [2402.19034]

    2024

  35. [43]

    Frellesvig, R

    H. Frellesvig, R. Morales and M. Wilhelm,Classifying post-Minkowskian geometries for gravitational waves via loop-by-loop Baikov,JHEP08(2024) 243 [2405.17255]

    2024

  36. [44]

    Frellesvig, R

    H. Frellesvig, R. Morales, S. P¨ ogel, S. Weinzierl and M. Wilhelm,Calabi-Yau Feynman integrals in gravity:ε-factorized form for apparent singularities,JHEP 02(2025) 209 [2412.12057]

    2025

  37. [45]

    Duhr and S

    C. Duhr and S. Maggio,Feynman integrals, elliptic integrals and two-parameter K3 surfaces,JHEP06(2025) 250 [2502.15326]

    2025

  38. [46]

    C. Duhr, S. Maggio, C. Nega, B. Sauer, L. Tancredi and F.J. Wagner,Aspects of canonical differential equations for Calabi-Yau geometries and beyond,JHEP06 (2025) 128 [2503.20655]

    2025

  39. [47]

    Maggio and Y

    S. Maggio and Y. Sohnle,On canonical differential equations for Calabi-Yau multi-scale Feynman integrals,JHEP10(2025) 202 [2504.17757]

    2025

  40. [48]

    Brammer, H

    D. Brammer, H. Frellesvig, R. Morales and M. Wilhelm,Classification of Feynman integral geometries for black-hole scattering at 5PM order,JHEP10(2025) 212 [2505.10274]. [49]εcollaboration,The geometric bookkeeping guide to Feynman integral reduction andε-factorised differentia...

    2025

  41. [49]

    C. Duhr, S. Maggio, F. Porkert, C. Semper and S.F. Stawinski,Three-loop banana integrals with four unequal masses,JHEP12(2025) 034 [2507.23061]

    2025

  42. [50]

    P¨ ogel, T

    S. P¨ ogel, T. Teschke, X. Wang and S. Weinzierl,The unequal-mass three-loop banana integral,2507.23594

  43. [51]

    C. Duhr, S. Maggio, F. Porkert, C. Semper, Y. Sohnle and S.F. Stawinski, Canonical differential equations and intersection matrices,2509.17787

  44. [52]

    Adams, E

    L. Adams, E. Chaubey and S. Weinzierl,Planar Double Box Integral for Top Pair Production with a Closed Top Loop to all orders in the Dimensional Regularization Parameter,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 142001 [1804.11144]

    2018 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Adams, E

    L. Adams, E. Chaubey and S. Weinzierl,Analytic results for the planar double box integral relevant to top-pair production with a closed top loop,JHEP10(2018) 206 [1806.04981]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Broedel, C

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, B. Penante and L. Tancredi,Elliptic polylogarithms and Feynman parameter integrals,JHEP05(2019) 120 [1902.09971]

    2019 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Abreu, M

    S. Abreu, M. Becchetti, C. Duhr and R. Marzucca,Three-loop contributions to the – 51 – ρparameter and iterated integrals of modular forms,JHEP02(2020) 050 [1912.02747]

    2020

  48. [56]

    C. Duhr, F. Gasparotto, C. Nega, L. Tancredi and S. Weinzierl,On the electron self-energy to three loops in QED,JHEP11(2024) 020 [2408.05154]

    2024

  49. [57]

    Forner, C

    F. Forner, C. Nega and L. Tancredi,On the photon self-energy to three loops in QED,JHEP03(2025) 148 [2411.19042]

    2025

  50. [58]

    Marzucca, A.J

    R. Marzucca, A.J. McLeod and C. Nega,Two-Loop Master Integrals for Mixed QCD-EW Corrections togg→HThroughO(ϵ 2),2501.14435

  51. [59]

    Becchetti, F

    M. Becchetti, F. Coro, C. Nega, L. Tancredi and F.J. Wagner,Analytic two-loop amplitudes forq q→γγand gg→γγmediated by a heavy-quark loop,JHEP06 (2025) 033 [2502.00118]

    2025

  52. [60]

    Bargiela and T.-Z

    P. Bargiela and T.-Z. Yang,On the finite basis of two-loop ‘t Hooft-Veltman Feynman integrals,2503.16299

  53. [61]

    F. Coro, C. Nega, L. Tancredi and F.J. Wagner,Analytic two-loop amplitudes for di-jet andγ+jet production mediated by a heavy-quark loop,2509.15315

  54. [62]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng,Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 4), Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 171601 [2101.07254]

    2021

  55. [63]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R.A. Porto,Dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach,Phys. Lett. B831 (2022) 137203 [2106.08276]

    2022

  56. [64]

    Dlapa, J.M

    C. Dlapa, J.M. Henn and F.J. Wagner,An algorithmic approach to finding canonical differential equations for elliptic Feynman integrals,JHEP08(2023) 120 [2211.16357]

    2023

  57. [65]

    Jakobsen, G

    G.U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and Y. Xu,Conservative Scattering of Spinning Black Holes at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 151401 [2306.01714]

    2023

  58. [66]

    Driesse, G.U

    M. Driesse, G.U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and J. Usovitsch, Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 241402 [2403.07781]

    2024

  59. [67]

    Driesse, G.U

    M. Driesse, G.U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and J. Usovitsch,Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering,Nature641(2025) 603 [2411.11846]

    2025

  60. [68]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M.S. Ruf, A.V. Smirnov, V.A. Smirnov and M. Zeng,Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering atO G5 , and loop integration,JHEP10(2024) 023 [2406.01554]

    2024

  61. [69]

    Bargiela and T.-Z

    P. Bargiela and T.-Z. Yang,Finite basis topologies for multiloop high-multiplicity Feynman integrals,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 096019 [2408.06325]. – 52 –

    2024

  62. [70]

    ’t Hooft and M.J.G

    G. ’t Hooft and M.J.G. Veltman,Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields,Nucl. Phys. B44(1972) 189

    1972

  63. [71]

    Mastrolia, T

    P. Mastrolia, T. Peraro and A. Primo,Adaptive Integrand Decomposition in parallel and orthogonal space,JHEP08(2016) 164 [1605.03157]

    2016 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Frellesvig and C.G

    H. Frellesvig and C.G. Papadopoulos,Cuts of Feynman Integrals in Baikov representation,JHEP04(2017) 083 [1701.07356]

    2017 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Frellesvig,The loop-by-loop Baikov representation — Strategies and implementation,JHEP04(2025) 111 [2412.01804]

    H. Frellesvig,The loop-by-loop Baikov representation — Strategies and implementation,JHEP04(2025) 111 [2412.01804]

    2025

  66. [74]

    Cachazo,Sharpening The Leading Singularity,0803.1988

    F. Cachazo,Sharpening The Leading Singularity,0803.1988

    1988 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Arkani-Hamed, J.L

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J.L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo and J. Trnka,Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes,JHEP06(2012) 125 [1012.6032]

    2012 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Schicho,Elementary Theory of Del Pezzo Surfaces, inComputational Methods for Algebraic Spline Surfaces, (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp

    J. Schicho,Elementary Theory of Del Pezzo Surfaces, inComputational Methods for Algebraic Spline Surfaces, (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 77–94, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005, DOI

    2005

  69. [77]

    Bloch, M

    S. Bloch, M. Kerr and P. Vanhove,Local mirror symmetry and the sunset Feynman integral,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.21(2017) 1373 [1601.08181]

    2017 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Schimmrigk,Special Fano geometry from Feynman integrals,Phys

    R. Schimmrigk,Special Fano geometry from Feynman integrals,Phys. Lett. B864 (2025) 139420 [2412.20236]

    2025

  71. [79]

    de la Cruz, P.P

    L. de la Cruz, P.P. Novichkov and P. Vanhove,Fano and Reflexive Polytopes from Feynman Integrals,2512.10518

  72. [80]

    Green and T

    P. Green and T. Hubsch,Calabi-yau Manifolds as Complete Intersections in Products of Complex Projective Spaces,Commun. Math. Phys.109(1987) 99

    1987

  73. [81]

    Candelas, A.M

    P. Candelas, A.M. Dale, C.A. Lutken and R. Schimmrigk,Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds,Nucl. Phys. B298(1988) 493

    1988

  74. [82]

    Hubsch,Calabi-Yau manifolds: A Bestiary for physicists, World Scientific, Singapore (1994), 10.1142/1410

    T. Hubsch,Calabi-Yau manifolds: A Bestiary for physicists, World Scientific, Singapore (1994), 10.1142/1410

    1994 doi

  75. [83]

    Tarasov,Connection between Feynman integrals having different values of the space-time dimension,Phys

    O.V. Tarasov,Connection between Feynman integrals having different values of the space-time dimension,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 6479 [hep-th/9606018]

    1996 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Lee and V.A

    R.N. Lee and V.A. Smirnov,The Dimensional Recurrence and Analyticity Method for Multicomponent Master Integrals: Using Unitarity Cuts to Construct Homogeneous Solutions,JHEP12(2012) 104 [1209.0339]

    2012 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Bollini and J.J

    C.G. Bollini and J.J. Giambiagi,Dimensional Renormalization: The Number of Dimensions as a Regularizing Parameter,Nuovo Cim. B12(1972) 20

    1972

  78. [86]

    Gluza, K

    J. Gluza, K. Kajda and D.A. Kosower,Towards a Basis for Planar Two-Loop Integrals,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 045012 [1009.0472]

    2011 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Adams, E

    L. Adams, E. Chaubey and S. Weinzierl,Simplifying Differential Equations for Multiscale Feynman Integrals beyond Multiple Polylogarithms,Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 141602 [1702.04279]. – 53 –

    2017 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Duhr and F

    C. Duhr and F. Brown,A double integral of dlog forms which is not polylogarithmic,PoSMA2019(2022) 005 [2006.09413]

    2022

  81. [89]

    Chetyrkin and F.V

    K.G. Chetyrkin and F.V. Tkachov,Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops,Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 159

    1981

  82. [90]

    Smirnov and M

    A.V. Smirnov and M. Zeng,FIRE 7: Automatic Reduction with Modular Approach, 2510.07150

  83. [91]

    Lange, J

    F. Lange, J. Usovitsch and Z. Wu,Kira 3: integral reduction with efficient seeding and optimized equation selection,2505.20197

  84. [92]

    Smirnov and V

    A. Smirnov and V. Smirnov,Two decades of algorithmic Feynman integral reduction,2510.10748

  85. [93]

    von Hippel and M

    M. von Hippel and M. Wilhelm,Refining Integration-by-Parts Reduction of Feynman Integrals with Machine Learning,JHEP05(2025) 185 [2502.05121]

    2025

  86. [94]

    Song, T.-Z

    Z.-Y. Song, T.-Z. Yang, Q.-H. Cao, M.-x. Luo and H.X. Zhu,Explainable AI-assisted Optimization for Feynman Integral Reduction,2502.09544

  87. [95]

    Zeng,Reinforcement Learning and Metaheuristics for Feynman Integral Reduction,2504.16045

    M. Zeng,Reinforcement Learning and Metaheuristics for Feynman Integral Reduction,2504.16045

  88. [96]

    de la Cruz and P

    L. de la Cruz and P. Vanhove,Algorithm for differential equations for Feynman integrals in general dimensions,Lett. Math. Phys.114(2024) 89 [2401.09908]

    2024

  89. [97]

    Britto, C

    R. Britto, C. Duhr, H.S. Hannesdottir and S. Mizera,Cutting-Edge Tools for Cutting Edges, inEncyclopedia of Mathematical Physics (Second Edition), (Oxford), pp. 595–620, Academic Press, 2025, DOI [2402.19415]

    2025

  90. [98]

    J. Henn, B. Mistlberger, V.A. Smirnov and P. Wasser,Constructing d-log integrands and computing master integrals for three-loop four-particle scattering, JHEP04(2020) 167 [2002.09492]

    2020

  91. [99]

    Primo and L

    A. Primo and L. Tancredi,On the maximal cut of Feynman integrals and the solution of their differential equations,Nucl. Phys. B916(2017) 94 [1610.08397]

    2017 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Bosma, M

    J. Bosma, M. Sogaard and Y. Zhang,Maximal Cuts in Arbitrary Dimension,JHEP 08(2017) 051 [1704.04255]

    2017 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Bourjaily, A.J

    J.L. Bourjaily, A.J. McLeod, C. Vergu, M. Volk, M. Von Hippel and M. Wilhelm, Embedding Feynman Integral (Calabi-Yau) Geometries in Weighted Projective Space,JHEP01(2020) 078 [1910.01534]

    2020

  94. [102]

    Barth, K

    W.P. Barth, K. Hulek, C.A.M. Peters and A. Van de Ven,The Enriques Kodaira Classification, inCompact Complex Surfaces, (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 243–267, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2004), DOI

    2004

  95. [103]

    Frellesvig, C

    H. Frellesvig, C. Vergu, M. Volk and M. von Hippel,Cuts and Isogenies,JHEP05 (2021) 064 [2102.02769]

    2021

  96. [104]

    Baikov,Explicit solutions of the multiloop integral recurrence relations and its application,Nucl

    P.A. Baikov,Explicit solutions of the multiloop integral recurrence relations and its application,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A389(1997) 347 [hep-ph/9611449]. – 54 –

    1997 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Dlapa, X

    C. Dlapa, X. Li and Y. Zhang,Leading singularities in Baikov representation and Feynman integrals with uniform transcendental weight,JHEP07(2021) 227 [2103.04638]

    2021

  98. [106]

    J. Chen, X. Jiang, C. Ma, X. Xu and L.L. Yang,Baikov representations, intersection theory, and canonical Feynman integrals,JHEP07(2022) 066 [2202.08127]

    2022

  99. [107]

    Bonciani, G

    R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi and A. Vicini,On the Generalized Harmonic Polylogarithms of One Complex Variable,Comput. Phys. Commun.182(2011) 1253 [1007.1891]

    2011 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Adams and S

    L. Adams and S. Weinzierl,Theε-form of the differential equations for Feynman integrals in the elliptic case,Phys. Lett. B781(2018) 270 [1802.05020]

    2018 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Broedel, C

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat and L. Tancredi,Elliptic polylogarithms and iterated integrals on elliptic curves. Part I: general formalism,JHEP05(2018) 093 [1712.07089]

    2018 arXiv

  102. [110]

    von Manteuffel and L

    A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,A non-planar two-loop three-point function beyond multiple polylogarithms,JHEP06(2017) 127 [1701.05905]

    2017 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Abreu, B

    S. Abreu, B. Page and M. Zeng,Differential equations from unitarity cuts: nonplanar hexa-box integrals,JHEP01(2019) 006 [1807.11522]

    2019 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Chicherin, T

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn, N.A. Lo Presti, V. Mitev and P. Wasser, Analytic result for the nonplanar hexa-box integrals,JHEP03(2019) 042 [1809.06240]

    2019 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Kardos, C.G

    A. Kardos, C.G. Papadopoulos, A.V. Smirnov, N. Syrrakos and C. Wever, Two-loop non-planar hexa-box integrals with one massive leg,JHEP05(2022) 033 [2201.07509]

    2022

  106. [114]

    Bonciani, V

    R. Bonciani, V. Del Duca, H. Frellesvig, J.M. Henn, F. Moriello and V.A. Smirnov, Two-loop planar master integrals for Higgs→3partons with full heavy-quark mass dependence,JHEP12(2016) 096 [1609.06685]

    2016 arXiv

  107. [115]

    M¨ uller and S

    H. M¨ uller and S. Weinzierl,A Feynman integral depending on two elliptic curves, JHEP07(2022) 101 [2205.04818]

    2022

  108. [116]

    Enriquez and F

    B. Enriquez and F. Zerbini,Construction of Maurer-Cartan elements over configuration spaces of curves,2110.09341

  109. [117]

    Enriquez and F

    B. Enriquez and F. Zerbini,Analogues of hyperlogarithm functions on affine complex curves,Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences 61(2025) 627 [2212.03119]

    2025

  110. [118]

    D’Hoker, M

    E. D’Hoker, M. Hidding and O. Schlotterer,Constructing polylogarithms on higher-genus Riemann surfaces,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.19(2025) 355 [2306.08644]

    2025

  111. [119]

    D’Hoker and O

    E. D’Hoker and O. Schlotterer,Fay identities for polylogarithms on higher-genus Riemann surfaces,2407.11476. – 55 –

  112. [120]

    Baune, J

    K. Baune, J. Broedel, E. Im, A. Lisitsyn and Y. Moeckli,Higher-genus Fay-like identities from meromorphic generating functions,2409.08208

  113. [121]

    Bloch,Double Box Motive,SIGMA17(2021) 048 [2105.06132]

    S. Bloch,Double Box Motive,SIGMA17(2021) 048 [2105.06132]

    2021

  114. [122]

    Bourjaily, A.J

    J.L. Bourjaily, A.J. McLeod, M. Spradlin, M. von Hippel and M. Wilhelm,Elliptic Double-Box Integrals: Massless Scattering Amplitudes beyond Polylogarithms,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 121603 [1712.02785]

    2018 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Vergu and M

    C. Vergu and M. Volk,Traintrack Calabi-Yaus from Twistor Geometry,JHEP07 (2020) 160 [2005.08771]

    2020

  116. [124]

    Bree et al.,New algorithms for Feynman integral reduction andε-factorised differential equations,2511.15381

    I. Bree et al.,New algorithms for Feynman integral reduction andε-factorised differential equations,2511.15381

    arXiv

  117. [125]

    Slodowy,Platonic solids, kleinian singularities, and lie groups, inAlgebraic Geometry, I

    P. Slodowy,Platonic solids, kleinian singularities, and lie groups, inAlgebraic Geometry, I. Dolgachev, ed., (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 102–138, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1983, DOI

    1983

  118. [126]

    Chicherin, T

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia,All Master Integrals for Three-Jet Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 041603 [1812.11160]

    2019

  119. [127]

    Igusa,Arithmetic variety of moduli for genus two,Annals of Mathematics72 (1960) 612

    J.-I. Igusa,Arithmetic variety of moduli for genus two,Annals of Mathematics72 (1960) 612

    1960

  120. [128]

    Besier, D

    M. Besier, D. Van Straten and S. Weinzierl,Rationalizing roots: an algorithmic approach,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.13(2019) 253 [1809.10983]

    2019 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Besier, P

    M. Besier, P. Wasser and S. Weinzierl,RationalizeRoots: Software Package for the Rationalization of Square Roots,Comput. Phys. Commun.253(2020) 107197 [1910.13251]

    2020

  122. [130]

    Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals, Springer Cham (1, 2022), 10.1007/978-3-030-99558-4, [2201.03593]

    S. Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals, Springer Cham (1, 2022), 10.1007/978-3-030-99558-4, [2201.03593]

    2022 doi

  123. [131]

    Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,Phys

    A.V. Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,Phys. Lett. B254(1991) 158

    1991

  124. [132]

    Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys

    J.M. Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 251601 [1304.1806]

    2013 arXiv

  125. [133]

    G¨ orges, C

    L. G¨ orges, C. Nega, L. Tancredi and F.J. Wagner,On a procedure to derive ϵ-factorised differential equations beyond polylogarithms,JHEP07(2023) 206 [2305.14090]

    2023

  126. [134]

    Levin and G

    A. Levin and G. Racinet,Towards multiple elliptic polylogarithms,math/0703237

    arXiv

  127. [135]

    Brown and A

    F.C.S. Brown and A. Levin,Multiple Elliptic Polylogarithms,1110.6917

    arXiv

  128. [136]

    Broedel, C.R

    J. Broedel, C.R. Mafra, N. Matthes and O. Schlotterer,Elliptic multiple zeta values and one-loop superstring amplitudes,JHEP07(2015) 112 [1412.5535]

    2015 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Broedel, C

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, B. Penante and L. Tancredi,Elliptic symbol – 56 – calculus: from elliptic polylogarithms to iterated integrals of Eisenstein series, JHEP08(2018) 014 [1803.10256]

    2018 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Broedel, C

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, B. Penante and L. Tancredi,Elliptic Feynman integrals and pure functions,JHEP01(2019) 023 [1809.10698]

    2019 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Bourjaily and J

    J.L. Bourjaily and J. Trnka,Local Integrand Representations of All Two-Loop Amplitudes in Planar SYM,JHEP08(2015) 119 [1505.05886]

    2015 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Bourjaily, E

    J.L. Bourjaily, E. Herrmann and J. Trnka,Prescriptive Unitarity,JHEP06(2017) 059 [1704.05460]

    2017 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Ita,Two-loop Integrand Decomposition into Master Integrals and Surface Terms,Phys

    H. Ita,Two-loop Integrand Decomposition into Master Integrals and Surface Terms,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 116015 [1510.05626]

    2016 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Abreu, J

    S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, M. Kraus, B. Page et al., Caravel: A C++ framework for the computation of multi-loop amplitudes with numerical unitarity,Comput. Phys. Commun.267(2021) 108069 [2009.11957]

    2021

  135. [143]

    De Laurentis, H

    G. De Laurentis, H. Ita, M. Klinkert and V. Sotnikov,Double-virtual NNLO QCD corrections for five-parton scattering. I. The gluon channel,Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 094023 [2311.10086]

    2024

  136. [144]

    De Laurentis, H

    G. De Laurentis, H. Ita and V. Sotnikov,Double-virtual NNLO QCD corrections for five-parton scattering. II. The quark channels,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 094024 [2311.18752]

    2024

  137. [145]

    Agarwal, F

    B. Agarwal, F. Buccioni, F. Devoto, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,Five-parton scattering in QCD at two loops,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 094025 [2311.09870]

    2024

  138. [146]

    Badger, M

    S. Badger, M. Becchetti, N. Giraudo and S. Zoia,Two-loop integrals fort t+jet production at hadron colliders in the leading colour approximation,JHEP07 (2024) 073 [2404.12325]

    2024

  139. [147]

    Becchetti, D

    M. Becchetti, D. Canko, V. Chestnov, T. Peraro, M. Pozzoli and S. Zoia,Two-loop Feynman integrals for leading colourt tWproduction at hadron colliders,JHEP07 (2025) 001 [2504.13011]

    2025

  140. [148]

    Papadopoulos, D

    C.G. Papadopoulos, D. Tommasini and C. Wever,The Pentabox Master Integrals with the Simplified Differential Equations approach,JHEP04(2016) 078 [1511.09404]

    2016 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Gehrmann, J.M

    T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn and N.A. Lo Presti,Pentagon functions for massless planar scattering amplitudes,JHEP10(2018) 103 [1807.09812]

    2018 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Chicherin and V

    D. Chicherin and V. Sotnikov,Pentagon Functions for Scattering of Five Massless Particles,JHEP20(2020) 167 [2009.07803]

    2020

  143. [151]

    Chicherin, V

    D. Chicherin, V. Sotnikov and S. Zoia,Pentagon functions for one-mass planar scattering amplitudes,JHEP01(2022) 096 [2110.10111]

    2022

  144. [152]

    Febres Cordero, G

    F. Febres Cordero, G. Figueiredo, M. Kraus, B. Page and L. Reina,Two-loop – 57 – master integrals for leading-colorpp→t tHamplitudes with a light-quark loop, JHEP07(2024) 084 [2312.08131]

    2024

  145. [153]

    To appear

    P. Bargiela, H. Frellesvig, R. Marzucca, R. Morales, F. Seefeld, M. Wilhelm and T.-Z. Yang, “To appear.” – 58 –

Pith tools

Reviewed May 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.