arxiv: 2605.07729 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph· math.AG

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Genus drop involving non-hyperelliptic curves in Feynman integrals

Feiyu Yang , Jianyu Gong , Yang Zhang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 02:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-phmath.AG

keywords genus dropFeynman integralsunramified double coveringalgebraic curveshyperelliptic curvesnon-hyperelliptic curvesthree-loop diagramsextra-involution

0 comments

The pith

Unramified double coverings between algebraic curves explain genus drops even when Feynman integrals shift from non-hyperelliptic to hyperelliptic types.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper recasts the extra-involution mechanism previously used for genus drops in hyperelliptic Feynman integrals as one instance of an unramified double covering of curves. It shows that the same covering accounts for genus reduction accompanied by a change in curve type for certain three-loop diagrams. Within a chosen framework the discrete spacetime symmetry producing the drop appears explicitly. The authors also observe that some non-hyperelliptic integrals display no such genus drop at all.

Core claim

The extra-involution mechanism of earlier work on hyperelliptic genus drop is a special case of an unramified double covering between algebraic curves; the same covering explains genus drops that occur together with a curve-type change from non-hyperelliptic to hyperelliptic in a class of three-loop Feynman diagrams, and the origin of the discrete spacetime symmetry becomes manifest inside a specific framework.

What carries the argument

The unramified double covering between algebraic curves, which maps one curve onto another without ramification and thereby lowers the genus while permitting a change in curve type.

If this is right

Genus drops can be treated uniformly through curve coverings rather than separate involution arguments for each diagram class.
A concrete family of three-loop diagrams exhibits genus drop together with a non-hyperelliptic to hyperelliptic transition via the covering.
The discrete spacetime symmetry responsible for the drop becomes directly visible once the covering is adopted.
Not every non-hyperelliptic Feynman integral undergoes a genus drop.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The covering viewpoint may extend to diagrams beyond three loops or to other symmetry-induced reductions.
It supplies a route to classify which diagram topologies admit genus drop by inspecting their symmetry-induced coverings.
Direct numerical or symbolic genus calculations on explicit three-loop examples can test whether the predicted covering relation holds.
The same language may clarify analytic continuations or branch structures in related integrals that lack an obvious genus drop.

Load-bearing premise

The genus drop observed for the chosen Feynman diagrams is produced entirely by the unramified double covering and is not modified by extra analytic continuations or residue conditions.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of the genus of the algebraic curve associated with one concrete three-loop non-hyperelliptic diagram, followed by checking whether the genus equals the value predicted by the double-covering map from the unreduced curve.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07729 by Feiyu Yang, Jianyu Gong, Yang Zhang.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. The non-planar crossed box in [1] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. The pentagon-box-pentagon diagram with massive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

For both theoretical and phenomenological studies, it is important to analyze the function types of Feynman integrals. The phenomenon of genus drop between different representations of hyperelliptic Feynman integrals was discussed in \cite{Marzucca2024Genusdrop}. In this paper, we reformulate the extra-involution mechanism of \cite{Marzucca2024Genusdrop} as a special case of an unramified double covering between algebraic curves, and show that this covering mechanism also explains genus drops accompanied by a curve-type change from non-hyperelliptic to hyperelliptic for a class of three-loop Feynman diagrams. We also demonstrate that within a specific framework, the origin of the discrete spacetime symmetry that leads to the genus drop in hyperelliptic cases is manifest. This work also points out that there exist non-hyperelliptic Feynman integrals that exhibit no apparent genus drop.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper recasts the extra-involution genus drop from Marzucca et al. as an unramified double cover and extends the picture to non-hyperelliptic three-loop integrals, while flagging some cases with no drop.

read the letter

The core move is to treat the genus drop as coming from an unramified double covering of curves, with the earlier extra-involution as one instance. They apply the same covering logic to diagrams where the curve type itself changes from non-hyperelliptic to hyperelliptic, and they note that certain non-hyperelliptic integrals show no such drop. In one framework they also make the discrete spacetime symmetry behind the drop more visible algebraically. That geometric rephrasing is the main addition; it organizes existing observations and gives a uniform language for both the hyperelliptic and the mixed-type cases. The no-drop examples are a small but practical contribution for anyone trying to classify integral families by their function type. The argument stays conceptual. The abstract and the stress-test note both flag that the covering is shown to exist, but it is not yet clear whether it accounts for the full observed drop once Baikov residues, analytic continuations, or other discrete symmetries are included. If the paper only verifies the algebraic cover without checking the period matrix or the actual differential forms on the concrete integrals, then other mechanisms could still be contributing. The text does not appear to introduce new fitted parameters or circular definitions, which is good. This is aimed at the small group already working on the geometry of multi-loop integrals. Someone who has read Marzucca 2024 will see the extension quickly; a broader audience will need the examples spelled out. I would send it to referees. The reformulation is clean enough and the new cases are concrete enough to be worth checking against explicit calculations.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reformulates the extra-involution mechanism from Marzucca et al. (2024) as a special case of an unramified double covering between algebraic curves. It extends this to show that the covering explains genus drops accompanied by a curve-type change from non-hyperelliptic to hyperelliptic in a class of three-loop Feynman diagrams. The work also demonstrates that the origin of the discrete spacetime symmetry is manifest within a specific framework and notes the existence of non-hyperelliptic Feynman integrals without apparent genus drop.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the reformulation unifies prior observations of genus drop under a single algebraic-geometric mechanism and extends it to non-hyperelliptic cases, which is relevant for classifying transcendental functions in multi-loop integrals. The explicit treatment of the covering and the manifest symmetry in the chosen framework are positive features that could aid systematic analysis of Feynman integral function types for both theoretical and phenomenological purposes.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3: The assertion that the unramified double covering fully accounts for the genus drop (without independent contributions from Baikov polynomial factorization, residue theorems at infinity, or branch-cut choices) is load-bearing for the central claim but lacks an explicit verification, such as a direct comparison of the period matrix or holomorphic differentials before and after the covering.
[§4] §4, three-loop diagrams: The mapping from the specific Feynman integrals to the algebraic curves is assumed rather than derived in detail; without an explicit construction showing how the covering reduces the effective genus independently of other analytic continuations or residue conditions, the explanatory power for the curve-type change remains incomplete.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] Introduction: A short recap of the definition of genus drop and the distinction between hyperelliptic and non-hyperelliptic curves would improve accessibility for readers not familiar with the cited prior work.
Notation: Some symbols appearing in the curve equations and covering maps are introduced without prior definition; a dedicated notation table or inline definitions would aid clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and positive assessment of our work on reformulating the genus drop mechanism via unramified double coverings. We address the major comments below and will make revisions to enhance the explicitness of our arguments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3: The assertion that the unramified double covering fully accounts for the genus drop (without independent contributions from Baikov polynomial factorization, residue theorems at infinity, or branch-cut choices) is load-bearing for the central claim but lacks an explicit verification, such as a direct comparison of the period matrix or holomorphic differentials before and after the covering.

Authors: We acknowledge that providing an explicit verification would make the central claim more robust. In the revised version of the manuscript, we will add a subsection or appendix with a direct comparison of the period matrices and holomorphic differentials for the original and covered curves. This comparison will show that the reduction in genus is precisely due to the unramified double covering, with the other mentioned factors not contributing independently to the drop in this context. The framework we use makes the symmetry manifest, supporting this. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4, three-loop diagrams: The mapping from the specific Feynman integrals to the algebraic curves is assumed rather than derived in detail; without an explicit construction showing how the covering reduces the effective genus independently of other analytic continuations or residue conditions, the explanatory power for the curve-type change remains incomplete.

Authors: The mapping is based on the standard association via the Baikov polynomial and the resulting algebraic curve, as established in the literature cited and outlined in our Section 2. To strengthen the presentation, we will provide a more detailed explicit construction in the revised Section 4 for the three-loop examples. This will include how the discrete spacetime symmetry induces the unramified covering and reduces the effective genus, independent of the analytic continuation details. We believe this will clarify the explanatory power for the non-hyperelliptic to hyperelliptic transition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: external citation reformulated without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper cites an external reference (Marzucca2024Genusdrop) for the extra-involution mechanism and mathematically recasts it as a special case of an unramified double covering. This is an interpretive reformulation using algebraic geometry, not a self-definition or fitted input renamed as prediction. No self-citations by the current authors appear load-bearing; the extension to non-hyperelliptic curves and three-loop diagrams relies on independent curve-covering arguments rather than reducing the target genus-drop result to the cited input by construction. The paper explicitly notes counterexamples (non-hyperelliptic integrals without genus drop), confirming the framework is not tautological. All load-bearing steps remain externally verifiable via algebraic curve theory and are not equivalent to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work assumes standard facts from algebraic geometry about unramified coverings and genus calculations for curves associated to Feynman integrals; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Feynman integrals can be associated with algebraic curves whose genus determines their function type
Invoked throughout the abstract when discussing genus drop and curve-type change.
domain assumption Unramified double coverings preserve or reduce genus in a controlled way for these integrals
Central to the reformulation of the extra-involution mechanism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5449 in / 1364 out tokens · 42251 ms · 2026-05-11T02:01:47.062418+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

unramified double covering ... genus drops follow the pattern g → (g+1)/2, as dictated by the Riemann–Hurwitz formula
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Prym variety ... period matrices ... isogenous to Jac(C) ≅ Jac(C′) × P

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Amplitudes and Algebraic Geometry

that no even genus was found in three-loop diagrams. Since unramified double coverings always produce genus drops asg7→(g+ 1)/2, the generic genus must be odd for those diagrams that can undergo further genus drop in special kinematics where the external legs span only a subspace. IV. A NON-HYPERELLIPTIC DIAGRAM WITH NO KNOWN GENUS DROP We point out that ...

work page 2026
[2]

Marzucca, A

R. Marzucca, A. J. McLeod, B. Page, S. P¨ ogel, and S. Weinzierl, Physical Review D109, L031901 (2024), arXiv:2307.11497 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[3]

Chen, Bull

K.-T. Chen, Bull. Am. Math. Soc.83, 831 (1977)

work page 1977
[4]

A. B. Goncharov, Mathematical Research Letters5, 497 (1998)

work page 1998
[5]

A. B. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives (2001), arXiv:math/0103059

work page arXiv 2001
[6]

Duhr, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 69, 15 (2019)

C. Duhr, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 69, 15 (2019)

work page 2019
[7]

Duhr and P

C. Duhr and P. Mork, Analytic results for one- loop integrals in dimensional regularisation (2025), arXiv:2512.14363 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[8]

Bauberger, F

S. Bauberger, F. A. Berends, M. Boehm, and M. Buza, Nuclear Physics B434, 383 (1995), arXiv:hep- ph/9409388

work page arXiv 1995
[9]

Laporta and E

S. Laporta and E. Remiddi, Nuclear Physics B704, 349 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0406160

work page arXiv 2005
[10]

M¨ uller-Stach, S

S. M¨ uller-Stach, S. Weinzierl, and R. Zayadeh, Commu- nications in Number Theory and Physics6, 203 (2012), arXiv:1112.4360 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[11]

The two-loop sunrise graph with arbitrary masses,

L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, Journal of Math- ematical Physics54, 052303 (2013), arXiv:1302.7004 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[12]

Picard-Fuchs equations for Feynman inte- grals,

S. M¨ uller-Stach, S. Weinzierl, and R. Zayadeh, Com- munications in Mathematical Physics326, 237 (2014), arXiv:1212.4389 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[13]

Adams, C

L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, Journal of Math- ematical Physics55, 102301 (2014), arXiv:1405.5640 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[14]

The elliptic dilogarithm for the sunset graph,

S. Bloch and P. Vanhove, Journal of Number Theory148, 328 (2015), arXiv:1309.5865 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2015
[15]

Adams, C

L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, Journal of Mathematical Physics56, 10.1063/1.4926985 (2015), arXiv:1504.03255 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1063/1.4926985 2015
[16]

Adams, C

L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, PoSRAD- COR2015, 096 (2016), arXiv:1601.03646 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[17]

Adams, C

L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, Journal of Math- ematical Physics57, 032304 (2016), arXiv:1512.05630 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[18]

Adams, C

L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, PoSLL2016, 033 (2016), arXiv:1606.09457 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[19]

Adams, C

L. Adams, C. Bogner, A. Schweitzer, and S. Weinzierl, Journal of Mathematical Physics57, 122302 (2016), arXiv:1607.01571 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[20]

Bogner, A

C. Bogner, A. Schweitzer, and S. Weinzierl, Nuclear Physics B922, 528 (2017), arXiv:1705.08952 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[21]

J. L. Bourjaily, A. J. McLeod, M. Spradlin, M. von Hippel, and M. Wilhelm, Physical Review Letters 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.121603 (2018), arXiv:1712.02785 [hep-th]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.121603 2018
[22]

Broedel, C

J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, and L. Tancredi, Journal of High Energy Physics2018, 93 (2018), arXiv:1712.07089 [hep-th]. 9

work page arXiv 2018
[23]

Adams and S

L. Adams and S. Weinzierl, Communications in Num- ber Theory and Physics12, 193 (2018), arXiv:1704.08895 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[24]

Adams and S

L. Adams and S. Weinzierl, Physics Letters B781, 270 (2018), arXiv:1802.05020 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[25]

Broedel, C

J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, and L. Tancredi, Physical Review D97, 116009 (2018), arXiv:1712.07095 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[26]

Adams, E

L. Adams, E. Chaubey, and S. Weinzierl, Physical Re- view Letters121, 142001 (2018), arXiv:1804.11144 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[27]

Adams, E

L. Adams, E. Chaubey, and S. Weinzierl, Journal of High Energy Physics2018, 206 (2018), arXiv:1806.04981 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[28]

H¨ onemann, K

I. H¨ onemann, K. Tempest, and S. Weinzierl, Physical Review D98, 113008 (2018), arXiv:1811.09308 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[29]

Broedel, C

J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, B. Penante, and L. Tan- credi, Journal of High Energy Physics2019, 23 (2019), arXiv:1809.10698 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[30]

Bogner, S

C. Bogner, S. M¨ uller-Stach, and S. Weinzierl, Nuclear Physics B954, 114991 (2020), arXiv:1907.01251 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2020
[31]

Weinzierl, Nuclear Physics B964, 115309 (2021), arXiv:2011.07311 [hep-th]

S. Weinzierl, Nuclear Physics B964, 115309 (2021), arXiv:2011.07311 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[32]

Frellesvig,On epsilon factorized differential equations for elliptic Feynman integrals, JHEP03(2022) 079 [2110.07968]

H. Frellesvig, Journal of High Energy Physics2022, 79 (2022), arXiv:2110.07968 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[33]

M¨ uller and S

H. M¨ uller and S. Weinzierl, Journal of High Energy Physics2022, 101 (2022), arXiv:2205.04818 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[34]

Dlapa, J.M

C. Dlapa, J. M. Henn, and F. J. Wagner, Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 120 (2023), arXiv:2211.16357 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[35]

Delto, C

M. Delto, C. Duhr, L. Tancredi, and Y. J. Zhu, Physi- cal Review Letters132, 231904 (2023), arXiv:2311.06385 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[36]

Badger, M

S. Badger, M. Becchetti, N. Giraudo, and S. Zoia, Jour- nal of High Energy Physics 10.1007/JHEP07(2024)073 (2024), arXiv:2404.12325 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2024)073 2024
[37]

Frellesvig and S

H. Frellesvig and S. Weinzierl, SciPost Physics16, 150 (2024), arXiv:2301.02264 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[38]

C. Duhr, F. Gasparotto, C. Nega, L. Tancredi, and S. Weinzierl, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 20 (2024), arXiv:2408.05154 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[39]

Marzucca, A.J

R. Marzucca, A. J. McLeod, and C. Nega, Physical Review D: Particles and Fields112, 113007 (2025), arXiv:2501.14435 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[40]

Becchetti, F

M. Becchetti, F. Coro, C. Nega, L. Tancredi, and F. J. Wagner, Journal of High Energy Physics2025, 33 (2025), arXiv:2502.00118 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

Huang and Y

R. Huang and Y. Zhang, Journal of High Energy Physics 2013, 80 (2013), arXiv:1302.1023 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[42]

J. D. Hauenstein, R. Huang, D. Mehta, and Y. Zhang, Journal of High Energy Physics2015, 136 (2015), arXiv:1408.3355 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2015
[43]

Georgoudis and Y

A. Georgoudis and Y. Zhang, Journal of High Energy Physics 10.1007/JHEP12(2015)086 (2015), arXiv:1507.06310 [hep-th]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2015)086 2015
[44]

C. Duhr, F. Porkert, and S. F. Stawinski, Journal of High Energy Physics2025, 14 (2024), arXiv:2412.02300 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2024
[45]

Brown and O

F. Brown and O. Schnetz, Duke Mathematical Journal 161, 10.1215/00127094-1644201 (2012), arXiv:1006.4064 [math]

work page doi:10.1215/00127094-1644201 2012
[46]

A Feynman Integral via Higher Normal Functions,

S. Bloch, M. Kerr, and P. Vanhove, Compositio Math- ematica151, 2329 (2015), arXiv:1406.2664 [hep-ph, physics:hep-th, physics:math-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[47]

Local mirror symmetry and the sunset Feynman integral,

S. Bloch, M. Kerr, and P. Vanhove, Advances in The- oretical and Mathematical Physics21, 1373 (2018), arXiv:1601.08181 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[48]

J. L. Bourjaily, Y.-H. He, A. J. McLeod, M. von Hippel, and M. Wilhelm, Physical Review Letters121, 071603 (2018), arXiv:1805.09326 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[49]

J. L. Bourjaily, A. J. McLeod, M. von Hippel, and M. Wilhelm, Physical Review Letters122, 031601 (2019), arXiv:1810.07689 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[50]

J. L. Bourjaily, A. J. McLeod, C. Vergu, M. Volk, M. von Hippel, and M. Wilhelm, Journal of High Energy Physics 2020, 78 (2020), arXiv:1910.01534 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[51]

Thel-loop Banana Amplitude from GKZ Systems and relative Calabi-Yau Periods,

A. Klemm, C. Nega, and R. Safari, Journal of High En- ergy Physics2020, 88 (2020), arXiv:1912.06201 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[52]

Analytic structure of all loop banana integrals,

K. B¨ onisch, F. Fischbach, A. Klemm, C. Nega, and R. Sa- fari, Journal of High Energy Physics2021, 66 (2021), arXiv:2008.10574 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[53]

J. L. Bourjaily, J. Broedel, E. Chaubey, C. Duhr, H. Frellesvig, M. Hidding, R. Marzucca, A. J. McLeod, M. Spradlin, L. Tancredi, C. Vergu, M. Volk, A. Volovich, M. von Hippel, S. Weinzierl, M. Wilhelm, and C. Zhang (arXiv, 2022) arXiv:2203.07088 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[54]

Bönisch, C

K. B¨ onisch, C. Duhr, F. Fischbach, A. Klemm, and C. Nega, Journal of High Energy Physics2022, 156 (2022), arXiv:2108.05310 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[55]

Pögel, X

S. P¨ ogel, X. Wang, and S. Weinzierl, Physical Review Letters130, 101601 (2023), arXiv:2211.04292 [hep-ph, physics:hep-th, physics:math-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[56]

Algorithms for minimal Picard–Fuchs operators of Feynman integrals,

P. Lairez and P. Vanhove, Letters in Mathematical Physics113, 37 (2023), arXiv:2209.10962 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[57]

Frellesvig, R

H. Frellesvig, R. Morales, and M. Wilhelm, Physical Re- view Letters132, 201602 (2024), arXiv:2312.11371 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2024
[58]

Frellesvig, R

H. Frellesvig, R. Morales, and M. Wilhelm, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 243 (2024), arXiv:2405.17255 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[59]

Calabi-Yau Feynman integrals in gravity:ε-factorized form for apparent singularities,

H. Frellesvig, R. Morales, S. P¨ ogel, S. Weinzierl, and M. Wilhelm, Journal of High Energy Physics2025, 209 (2024), arXiv:2412.12057 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[60]

C. Duhr, S. Maggio, C. Nega, B. Sauer, L. Tancredi, and F. J. Wagner, Journal of High Energy Physics2025, 128 (2025), arXiv:2503.20655 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[61]

C. Duhr, S. Maggio, F. Porkert, C. Semper, and S. F. Stawinski, Journal of High Energy Physics2025, 34 (2025), arXiv:2507.23061 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[62]

Pögel, T

S. P¨ ogel, T. Teschke, X. Wang, and S. Weinzierl, Journal of High Energy Physics2026, 21 (2026), arXiv:2507.23594 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2026
[63]

Schimmrigk, Physics Letters B864, 139420 (2024), arXiv:2412.20236 [hep-th]

R. Schimmrigk, Physics Letters B864, 139420 (2024), arXiv:2412.20236 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[64]

de la Cruz, P

L. de la Cruz, P. P. Novichkov, and P. Vanhove, Fano and Reflexive Polytopes from Feynman Integrals (2025), arXiv:2512.10518 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[65]

Bargiela, H

P. Bargiela, H. Frellesvig, R. Marzucca, R. Morales, F. Seefeld, M. Wilhelm, and T.-Z. Yang, The spec- trum of Feynman-integral geometries at two loops (2025), arXiv:2512.13794 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[66]

Primo and L

A. Primo and L. Tancredi, Nuclear Physics B 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.12.021 (2017), arXiv:1610.08397

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.12.021 2016
[67]

Miranda,Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces (American Mathematical Society, 1995)

R. Miranda,Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces (American Mathematical Society, 1995)

work page 1995
[68]

Mumford, inContributions to Analysis(Elsevier,

D. Mumford, inContributions to Analysis(Elsevier,

work page
[69]

Frellesvig and C.G

H. Frellesvig and C. G. Papadopoulos, Journal of High Energy Physics2017, 83 (2017), arXiv:1701.07356 [hep- ph, physics:hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[70]

Badger, H

S. Badger, H. Frellesvig, and Y. Zhang, Journal of High Energy Physics2012, 55 (2012), arXiv:1202.2019 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[71]

Arbarello, M

E. Arbarello, M. Cornalba, P. A. Griffiths, and J. Harris, Geometry of Algebraic Curves, Vol. 267 (Springer, New York, NY, 1985)

work page 1985
[72]

R. D. M. Accola,Topics in the Theory of Riemann Sur- faces, Vol. 1595 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1994)

work page 1994
[73]

Frellesvig,The Loop-by-Loop Baikov Representation – Strategies and Implementation, 2412.01804

H. Frellesvig, Journal of High Energy Physics2025, 111 (2025), arXiv:2412.01804 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[74]

J. Henn, B. Mistlberger, V. A. Smirnov, and P. Wasser, Journal of High Energy Physics2020, 167 (2020), arXiv:2002.09492 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[75]

Besier, P

M. Besier, P. Wasser, and S. Weinzierl, Computer Physics Communications253, 107197 (2020), arXiv:1910.13251 [cs]

work page arXiv 2020
[76]

Shioda, American Journal of Mathematics89, 1022 (1967), 2373415

T. Shioda, American Journal of Mathematics89, 1022 (1967), 2373415

work page 1967
[77]

Shaska, Communications in Algebra42, 4110 (2014), arXiv:1209.1237 [math]

T. Shaska, Communications in Algebra42, 4110 (2014), arXiv:1209.1237 [math]

work page arXiv 2014
[78]

Hartshorne,Algebraic Geometry, Vol

R. Hartshorne,Algebraic Geometry, Vol. 52 (Springer New York, New York, NY, 1977)

work page 1977
[79]

Feynman Integrals. A Comprehensive Treatment for Students and Re- searchers,

S. Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals: A Comprehensive Treatment for Students and Researchers(Springer Inter- national Publishing, 2022) arXiv:2201.03593 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[80]

Birkenhake and H

C. Birkenhake and H. Lange,Complex Abelian Varieties, Vol. 302 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004)

work page 2004

Showing first 80 references.