pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.13794 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-15 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The spectrum of Feynman-integral geometries at two loops

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords Feynman integralstwo-loopleading singularitiesBaikov representationelliptic curvesK3 surfacesDel Pezzo surfacequantum field theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two-loop Feynman integrals in four dimensions reduce to Riemann spheres, elliptic curves, hyperelliptic curves of genus 2 and 3, K3 surfaces, and one rationalizable Del Pezzo surface of degree 2.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper classifies the geometric structures that appear in two-loop Feynman integrals with quadratic propagators in four-dimensional quantum field theory. Using a finite basis of 79 independent topologies in the 't Hooft-Veltman scheme, the authors compute leading singularities via the loop-by-loop Baikov representation for generic masses and momenta. This analysis yields the Riemann sphere along with elliptic curves, hyperelliptic curves of genus 2 and 3, K3 surfaces, and a smooth non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2 that is rationalizable to a genus-3 curve. These geometries fix the space of functions needed for all two-loop calculations, including those in the Standard Model.

Core claim

We provide a complete classification of the Feynman-integral geometries at two-loop order in four-dimensional Quantum Field Theory with standard quadratic propagators. We consider a finite basis of integrals in the 't Hooft-Veltman scheme belonging to 79 independent topologies. Analyzing the leading singularities using the loop-by-loop Baikov representation for generic masses and momenta reveals Riemann spheres, elliptic curves, hyperelliptic curves of genus 2 and 3, K3 surfaces, and a smooth non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2 that is rationalizable, resulting in a curve of geometric genus 3. These geometries determine the space of functions relevant for Quantum Field Theories at 2

What carries the argument

The loop-by-loop Baikov representation applied to leading singularities of integrals belonging to a finite basis of 79 topologies.

If this is right

  • The functional space required for two-loop quantum field theory calculations is spanned by integrals whose leading singularities lie on one of the identified varieties.
  • All two-loop integrals in the chosen basis fall into the Riemann sphere, elliptic, hyperelliptic genus 2 or 3, K3, or rationalizable Del Pezzo categories.
  • The rationalizability of the Del Pezzo surface reduces its contribution to a genus-3 curve, simplifying the associated master integrals.
  • Two-loop calculations in the Standard Model are governed by these same geometric types.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The classification supplies concrete targets for constructing analytic continuation algorithms that handle each geometry separately rather than a single generic method.
  • Extending the same loop-by-loop Baikov technique to three-loop sectors could map the next layer of geometries and reveal whether K3 surfaces persist or give way to higher-dimensional Calabi-Yau varieties.
  • The appearance of a rationalizable Del Pezzo surface suggests that certain apparently transcendental integrals may admit algebraic reductions once the geometry is exploited.

Load-bearing premise

The loop-by-loop Baikov representation applied to leading singularities for generic masses and momenta fully determines the geometry of every integral in the chosen finite basis of 79 topologies, and that this basis is exhaustive for all two-loop sectors.

What would settle it

Finding even one two-loop integral whose leading singularity defines an algebraic variety outside the listed types, such as a curve of genus 4 or a non-rationalizable surface of degree higher than 2, would falsify the claimed completeness of the classification.

read the original abstract

We provide a complete classification of the Feynman-integral geometries at two-loop order in four-dimensional Quantum Field Theory with standard quadratic propagators. Concretely, we consider a finite basis of integrals in the 't Hooft--Veltman scheme, i.e. with $D$-dimensional loop momenta and four-dimensional external momenta, which belong to 79 independent topologies, or sectors. Then, we analyze the leading singularities of the integrals in those sectors for generic values of the masses and momenta, using the loop-by-loop Baikov representation. Aside from the Riemann sphere, we find that elliptic curves, hyperelliptic curves of genus 2 and 3 as well as K3 surfaces occur. Moreover, we find a smooth and non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2, a particular Fano variety known to be rationalizable, resulting in a curve of geometric genus 3. These geometries determine the space of functions relevant for Quantum Field Theories at two-loop order, including in the Standard Model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to deliver a complete classification of the algebraic geometries of two-loop Feynman integrals in four-dimensional QFT with quadratic propagators. It restricts attention to a finite basis of 79 independent topologies in the 't Hooft-Veltman scheme and extracts their leading singularities via the loop-by-loop Baikov representation at generic masses and momenta, reporting the appearance of the Riemann sphere, elliptic curves, hyperelliptic curves of genus 2 and 3, K3 surfaces, and a smooth non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2 that reduces to a genus-3 curve.

Significance. If the 79-topology basis is exhaustive and the leading-singularity loci coincide with the full Picard-Fuchs varieties, the classification would delineate the precise function spaces required for all two-loop calculations in the Standard Model and related theories, thereby guiding the construction of canonical bases and differential equations for multi-loop amplitudes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (basis construction): the claim that the chosen set of 79 topologies exhausts every two-loop sector with quadratic propagators is asserted without an explicit enumeration, generation algorithm, or reference to a prior exhaustive list; this is load-bearing for the 'complete classification' statement.
  2. [§3] §3 (leading-singularity analysis): the assertion that loop-by-loop Baikov leading singularities evaluated at generic masses and momenta fully determine the algebraic geometry of each integral (including agreement with the Picard-Fuchs variety of the uncut integral) lacks a concrete verification step or counter-example check; without this, the listed spectrum (Riemann sphere through Del Pezzo) may be incomplete.
  3. [§4] §4 (Del Pezzo surface): the identification of a smooth non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2 and its rationalizability to a genus-3 curve requires an explicit equation or maximal-cut computation showing that no additional singularities or degenerations arise within the 79 sectors.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'standard quadratic propagators' without a one-sentence definition; this should be supplied in the introduction for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. [Appendix] A compact table or appendix listing all 79 topologies (with propagator counts, external legs, and mass assignments) would improve reproducibility and allow direct cross-checks of the geometry assignments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (basis construction): the claim that the chosen set of 79 topologies exhausts every two-loop sector with quadratic propagators is asserted without an explicit enumeration, generation algorithm, or reference to a prior exhaustive list; this is load-bearing for the 'complete classification' statement.

    Authors: The 79 topologies arise from a systematic enumeration of all two-loop diagrams with quadratic propagators and up to four external legs in the 't Hooft-Veltman scheme, followed by reduction to independent sectors via integration-by-parts identities. Section 2 outlines this construction, but we agree that greater transparency is needed. In the revision we will add a reference to standard catalogues of two-loop topologies in the literature and include a concise description of the generation algorithm, thereby supporting the completeness claim without altering the count. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (leading-singularity analysis): the assertion that loop-by-loop Baikov leading singularities evaluated at generic masses and momenta fully determine the algebraic geometry of each integral (including agreement with the Picard-Fuchs variety of the uncut integral) lacks a concrete verification step or counter-example check; without this, the listed spectrum (Riemann sphere through Del Pezzo) may be incomplete.

    Authors: The loop-by-loop Baikov representation extracts leading singularities whose loci define the algebraic geometry, and this matches the Picard-Fuchs variety for generic kinematics by construction, as established in prior work on Feynman integrals. We performed explicit checks for representative integrals in each geometry class (Riemann sphere, elliptic, genus-2/3 hyperelliptic, K3). In the revision we will add a short verification subsection in §3 containing one concrete example per geometry class demonstrating agreement with the expected variety. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [§4] §4 (Del Pezzo surface): the identification of a smooth non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2 and its rationalizability to a genus-3 curve requires an explicit equation or maximal-cut computation showing that no additional singularities or degenerations arise within the 79 sectors.

    Authors: Section 4 derives the Del Pezzo surface directly from the maximal cut of the relevant topology via the Baikov representation, producing a smooth quadratic hypersurface of degree 2 in projective space at generic kinematics. The rationalization to a genus-3 curve follows from the standard birational equivalence for such surfaces. In the revision we will insert the explicit defining polynomial equation and confirm that the generic-parameter computation introduces no further singularities or degenerations within the 79 sectors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct classification from leading singularities

full rationale

The paper performs an explicit classification of two-loop Feynman-integral geometries by computing leading singularities via the loop-by-loop Baikov representation on a stated finite basis of 79 topologies for generic masses and momenta. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the listed geometries (Riemann sphere through Del Pezzo) are outputs of that singularity analysis rather than inputs. The exhaustiveness claim for the 79-topology basis is an external assertion about the space of integrals, not a definitional tautology inside the derivation itself. This is the normal non-circular outcome for a computational classification paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard 't Hooft-Veltman dimensional regularization scheme and the loop-by-loop Baikov representation; no new free parameters or postulated entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The 't Hooft-Veltman scheme with D-dimensional loop momenta and four-dimensional external momenta is the appropriate regularization for classifying two-loop geometries.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the scheme employed.
  • domain assumption Leading singularities extracted via the loop-by-loop Baikov representation determine the algebraic geometry of each integral for generic masses and momenta.
    The method used to obtain the listed curves and surfaces.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5491 in / 1302 out tokens · 39915 ms · 2026-05-16T21:39:19.864040+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We analyze the leading singularities of the integrals in those sectors for generic values of the masses and momenta, using the loop-by-loop Baikov representation. Aside from the Riemann sphere, we find that elliptic curves, hyperelliptic curves of genus 2 and 3 as well as K3 surfaces occur. Moreover, we find a smooth and non-degenerate Del Pezzo surface of degree 2...

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    the configuration matrix... satisfies the CY condition (3.9) for a K3 surface... After the rationalization, the resulting geometry is a curve of geometric genus 3

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Integrand Analysis, Leading Singularities and Canonical Bases beyond Polylogarithms

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Feynman integrals selected for unit leading singularities in complex geometries satisfy epsilon-factorized differential equations with new transcendental functions corresponding to periods and differential forms in th...

  2. Genus drop involving non-hyperelliptic curves in Feynman integrals

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The extra-involution mechanism for genus drop is a special case of unramified double covering between curves, which explains genus drops with non-hyperelliptic to hyperelliptic transitions in certain three-loop Feynma...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

153 extracted references · 153 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 49 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. Andersen et al.,Les Houches 2023: Physics at TeV Colliders: Standard Model Working Group Report, inPhysics of the TeV Scale and Beyond the Standard Model: Intensifying the Quest for New Physics, 6, 2024 [2406.00708]

  2. [2]

    A. Huss, J. Huston, S. Jones, M. Pellen and R. R¨ ontsch,Les Houches 2023 – Physics at TeV Colliders: Report on the Standard Model Precision Wishlist, 2504.06689

  3. [3]

    Papathanasiou, S

    G. Papathanasiou, S. Weinzierl, K. Wu and Y. Zhang,Rationalisation of multiple square roots in Feynman integrals,JHEP05(2025) 078 [2501.07490]

  4. [4]

    Chen,Iterated path integrals,Bull

    K.-T. Chen,Iterated path integrals,Bull. Am. Math. Soc.83(1977) 831

  5. [5]

    Goncharov,Geometry of Configurations, Polylogarithms, and Motivic Cohomology,Adv

    A.B. Goncharov,Geometry of Configurations, Polylogarithms, and Motivic Cohomology,Adv. Math.114(1995) 197

  6. [6]

    Bourjaily, J

    J.L. Bourjaily, J. Broedel, E. Chaubey, C. Duhr, H. Frellesvig, M. Hidding, R. Marzucca, A.J. McLeod, M. Spradlin, L. Tancredi, C. Vergu, M. Volk, A. Volovich, M. von Hippel, S. Weinzierl, M. Wilhelm and C. Zhang,Functions Beyond Multiple Polylogarithms for Precision Collider Physics, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.07088]

  7. [7]

    Sabry,Fourth order spectral functions for the electron propagator,Nucl

    A. Sabry,Fourth order spectral functions for the electron propagator,Nucl. Phys. 33(1962) 401

  8. [8]

    Two-loop two-point functions with masses: asymptotic expansions and Taylor series, in any dimension

    D.J. Broadhurst, J. Fleischer and O.V. Tarasov,Two loop two point functions with masses: Asymptotic expansions and Taylor series, in any dimension,Z. Phys. C 60(1993) 287 [hep-ph/9304303]. – 48 –

  9. [9]

    Analytic treatment of the two loop equal mass sunrise graph

    S. Laporta and E. Remiddi,Analytic treatment of the two loop equal mass sunrise graph,Nucl. Phys. B704(2005) 349 [hep-ph/0406160]

  10. [10]

    Caron-Huot and K.J

    S. Caron-Huot and K.J. Larsen,Uniqueness of two-loop master contours,JHEP10 (2012) 026 [1205.0801]

  11. [11]

    The two-loop sunrise graph with arbitrary masses

    L. Adams, C. Bogner and S. Weinzierl,The two-loop sunrise graph with arbitrary masses,J. Math. Phys.54(2013) 052303 [1302.7004]

  12. [12]

    The elliptic dilogarithm for the sunset graph

    S. Bloch and P. Vanhove,The elliptic dilogarithm for the sunset graph,J. Number Theor.148(2015) 328 [1309.5865]

  13. [13]

    The two-loop sunrise graph in two space-time dimensions with arbitrary masses in terms of elliptic dilogarithms

    L. Adams, C. Bogner and S. Weinzierl,The two-loop sunrise graph in two space-time dimensions with arbitrary masses in terms of elliptic dilogarithms,J. Math. Phys.55(2014) 102301 [1405.5640]

  14. [14]

    Differential equations and dispersion relations for Feynman amplitudes. The two-loop massive sunrise and the kite integral

    E. Remiddi and L. Tancredi,Differential equations and dispersion relations for Feynman amplitudes. The two-loop massive sunrise and the kite integral,Nucl. Phys. B907(2016) 400 [1602.01481]

  15. [15]

    The kite integral to all orders in terms of elliptic polylogarithms

    L. Adams, C. Bogner, A. Schweitzer and S. Weinzierl,The kite integral to all orders in terms of elliptic polylogarithms,J. Math. Phys.57(2016) 122302 [1607.01571]

  16. [16]

    Elliptic polylogarithms and iterated integrals on elliptic curves II: an application to the sunrise integral

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat and L. Tancredi,Elliptic polylogarithms and iterated integrals on elliptic curves II: an application to the sunrise integral,Phys. Rev. D 97(2018) 116009 [1712.07095]

  17. [17]

    Kristensson, M

    A. Kristensson, M. Wilhelm and C. Zhang,Elliptic Double Box and Symbology Beyond Polylogarithms,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 251603 [2106.14902]

  18. [18]

    Giroux and A

    M. Giroux and A. Pokraka,Loop-by-loop differential equations for dual (elliptic) Feynman integrals,JHEP03(2023) 155 [2210.09898]

  19. [19]

    Morales, A

    R. Morales, A. Spiering, M. Wilhelm, Q. Yang and C. Zhang,Bootstrapping Elliptic Feynman Integrals Using Schubert Analysis,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 041601 [2212.09762]

  20. [20]

    McLeod, R

    A. McLeod, R. Morales, M. von Hippel, M. Wilhelm and C. Zhang,An infinite family of elliptic ladder integrals,JHEP05(2023) 236 [2301.07965]

  21. [21]

    Stawinski,An elliptic one-loop amplitude in anti-de-Sitter space,JHEP02 (2024) 208 [2309.15059]

    S.F. Stawinski,An elliptic one-loop amplitude in anti-de-Sitter space,JHEP02 (2024) 208 [2309.15059]

  22. [22]

    Giroux, A

    M. Giroux, A. Pokraka, F. Porkert and Y. Sohnle,The soaring kite: a tale of two punctured tori,JHEP05(2024) 239 [2401.14307]

  23. [23]

    Spiering, M

    A. Spiering, M. Wilhelm and C. Zhang,All Planar Two-Loop Amplitudes in Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 071602 [2406.15549]

  24. [24]

    On Genera of Curves from High-loop Generalized Unitarity Cuts

    R. Huang and Y. Zhang,On Genera of Curves from High-loop Generalized Unitarity Cuts,JHEP04(2013) 080 [1302.1023]. – 49 –

  25. [25]

    Marzucca, A.J

    R. Marzucca, A.J. McLeod, B. Page, S. P¨ ogel and S. Weinzierl,Genus drop in hyperelliptic Feynman integrals,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L031901 [2307.11497]

  26. [26]

    C. Duhr, F. Porkert and S.F. Stawinski,Canonical differential equations beyond genus one,JHEP02(2025) 014 [2412.02300]

  27. [27]

    Maximal cuts and differential equations for Feynman integrals. An application to the three-loop massive banana graph

    A. Primo and L. Tancredi,Maximal cuts and differential equations for Feynman integrals. An application to the three-loop massive banana graph,Nucl. Phys. B 921(2017) 316 [1704.05465]

  28. [28]

    Traintracks Through Calabi-Yaus: Amplitudes Beyond Elliptic Polylogarithms

    J.L. Bourjaily, Y.-H. He, A.J. Mcleod, M. Von Hippel and M. Wilhelm,Traintracks through Calabi-Yau Manifolds: Scattering Amplitudes beyond Elliptic Polylogarithms,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 071603 [1805.09326]

  29. [29]

    A (Bounded) Bestiary of Feynman Integral Calabi-Yau Geometries

    J.L. Bourjaily, A.J. McLeod, M. von Hippel and M. Wilhelm,Bounded Collection of Feynman Integral Calabi-Yau Geometries,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 031601 [1810.07689]

  30. [30]

    B¨ onisch, C

    K. B¨ onisch, C. Duhr, F. Fischbach, A. Klemm and C. Nega,Feynman integrals in dimensional regularization and extensions of Calabi-Yau motives,JHEP09(2022) 156 [2108.05310]

  31. [31]

    Broedel, C

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr and N. Matthes,Meromorphic modular forms and the three-loop equal-mass banana integral,JHEP02(2022) 184 [2109.15251]

  32. [32]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega and F. Porkert,Yangian-Invariant Fishnet Integrals in Two Dimensions as Volumes of Calabi-Yau Varieties,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 041602 [2209.05291]

  33. [33]

    Lairez and P

    P. Lairez and P. Vanhove,Algorithms for minimal Picard–Fuchs operators of Feynman integrals,Lett. Math. Phys.113(2023) 37 [2209.10962]

  34. [34]

    P¨ ogel, X

    S. P¨ ogel, X. Wang and S. Weinzierl,Bananas of equal mass: any loop, any order in the dimensional regularisation parameter,JHEP04(2023) 117 [2212.08908]

  35. [35]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, C. Nega and L. Tancredi,The ice cone family and iterated integrals for Calabi-Yau varieties,JHEP02(2023) 228 [2212.09550]

  36. [36]

    Q. Cao, S. He and Y. Tang,Cutting the traintracks: Cauchy, Schubert and Calabi-Yau,JHEP04(2023) 072 [2301.07834]

  37. [37]

    Doran, A

    C.F. Doran, A. Harder, P. Vanhove and E. Pichon-Pharabod,Motivic Geometry of two-Loop Feynman Integrals,Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.75(2024) 901 [2302.14840]

  38. [38]

    McLeod and M

    A.J. McLeod and M. von Hippel,Traintracks All the Way Down,2306.11780

  39. [39]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega and F. Porkert,The Basso-Dixon formula and Calabi-Yau geometry,JHEP03(2024) 177 [2310.08625]

  40. [40]

    Frellesvig, R

    H. Frellesvig, R. Morales and M. Wilhelm,Calabi-Yau Meets Gravity: A Calabi-Yau Threefold at Fifth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 201602 [2312.11371]. – 50 –

  41. [41]

    Klemm, C

    A. Klemm, C. Nega, B. Sauer and J. Plefka,Calabi-Yau periods for black hole scattering in classical general relativity,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 124046 [2401.07899]

  42. [42]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega and F. Porkert,Geometry from integrability: multi-leg fishnet integrals in two dimensions,JHEP07(2024) 008 [2402.19034]

  43. [43]

    Frellesvig, R

    H. Frellesvig, R. Morales and M. Wilhelm,Classifying post-Minkowskian geometries for gravitational waves via loop-by-loop Baikov,JHEP08(2024) 243 [2405.17255]

  44. [44]

    Frellesvig, R

    H. Frellesvig, R. Morales, S. P¨ ogel, S. Weinzierl and M. Wilhelm,Calabi-Yau Feynman integrals in gravity:ε-factorized form for apparent singularities,JHEP 02(2025) 209 [2412.12057]

  45. [45]

    Duhr and S

    C. Duhr and S. Maggio,Feynman integrals, elliptic integrals and two-parameter K3 surfaces,JHEP06(2025) 250 [2502.15326]

  46. [46]

    C. Duhr, S. Maggio, C. Nega, B. Sauer, L. Tancredi and F.J. Wagner,Aspects of canonical differential equations for Calabi-Yau geometries and beyond,JHEP06 (2025) 128 [2503.20655]

  47. [47]

    Maggio and Y

    S. Maggio and Y. Sohnle,On canonical differential equations for Calabi-Yau multi-scale Feynman integrals,JHEP10(2025) 202 [2504.17757]

  48. [48]

    Brammer, H

    D. Brammer, H. Frellesvig, R. Morales and M. Wilhelm,Classification of Feynman integral geometries for black-hole scattering at 5PM order,JHEP10(2025) 212 [2505.10274]. [49]εcollaboration,The geometric bookkeeping guide to Feynman integral reduction andε-factorised differential equations,2506.09124

  49. [49]

    C. Duhr, S. Maggio, F. Porkert, C. Semper and S.F. Stawinski,Three-loop banana integrals with four unequal masses,JHEP12(2025) 034 [2507.23061]

  50. [50]

    P¨ ogel, T

    S. P¨ ogel, T. Teschke, X. Wang and S. Weinzierl,The unequal-mass three-loop banana integral,2507.23594

  51. [51]

    C. Duhr, S. Maggio, F. Porkert, C. Semper, Y. Sohnle and S.F. Stawinski, Canonical differential equations and intersection matrices,2509.17787

  52. [52]

    The planar double box integral for top pair production with a closed top loop to all orders in the dimensional regularisation parameter

    L. Adams, E. Chaubey and S. Weinzierl,Planar Double Box Integral for Top Pair Production with a Closed Top Loop to all orders in the Dimensional Regularization Parameter,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 142001 [1804.11144]

  53. [53]

    Analytic results for the planar double box integral relevant to top-pair production with a closed top loop

    L. Adams, E. Chaubey and S. Weinzierl,Analytic results for the planar double box integral relevant to top-pair production with a closed top loop,JHEP10(2018) 206 [1806.04981]

  54. [54]

    Elliptic polylogarithms and Feynman parameter integrals

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, B. Penante and L. Tancredi,Elliptic polylogarithms and Feynman parameter integrals,JHEP05(2019) 120 [1902.09971]

  55. [55]

    Abreu, M

    S. Abreu, M. Becchetti, C. Duhr and R. Marzucca,Three-loop contributions to the – 51 – ρparameter and iterated integrals of modular forms,JHEP02(2020) 050 [1912.02747]

  56. [56]

    C. Duhr, F. Gasparotto, C. Nega, L. Tancredi and S. Weinzierl,On the electron self-energy to three loops in QED,JHEP11(2024) 020 [2408.05154]

  57. [57]

    Forner, C

    F. Forner, C. Nega and L. Tancredi,On the photon self-energy to three loops in QED,JHEP03(2025) 148 [2411.19042]

  58. [58]

    Marzucca, A.J

    R. Marzucca, A.J. McLeod and C. Nega,Two-Loop Master Integrals for Mixed QCD-EW Corrections togg→HThroughO(ϵ 2),2501.14435

  59. [59]

    Becchetti, F

    M. Becchetti, F. Coro, C. Nega, L. Tancredi and F.J. Wagner,Analytic two-loop amplitudes forq q→γγand gg→γγmediated by a heavy-quark loop,JHEP06 (2025) 033 [2502.00118]

  60. [60]

    Bargiela and T.-Z

    P. Bargiela and T.-Z. Yang,On the finite basis of two-loop ‘t Hooft-Veltman Feynman integrals,2503.16299

  61. [61]

    F. Coro, C. Nega, L. Tancredi and F.J. Wagner,Analytic two-loop amplitudes for di-jet andγ+jet production mediated by a heavy-quark loop,2509.15315

  62. [62]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng,Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 4), Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 171601 [2101.07254]

  63. [63]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R.A. Porto,Dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach,Phys. Lett. B831 (2022) 137203 [2106.08276]

  64. [64]

    Dlapa, J.M

    C. Dlapa, J.M. Henn and F.J. Wagner,An algorithmic approach to finding canonical differential equations for elliptic Feynman integrals,JHEP08(2023) 120 [2211.16357]

  65. [65]

    Jakobsen, G

    G.U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and Y. Xu,Conservative Scattering of Spinning Black Holes at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 151401 [2306.01714]

  66. [66]

    Driesse, G.U

    M. Driesse, G.U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and J. Usovitsch, Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 241402 [2403.07781]

  67. [67]

    Driesse, G.U

    M. Driesse, G.U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and J. Usovitsch,Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering,Nature641(2025) 603 [2411.11846]

  68. [68]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M.S. Ruf, A.V. Smirnov, V.A. Smirnov and M. Zeng,Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering atO G5 , and loop integration,JHEP10(2024) 023 [2406.01554]

  69. [69]

    Bargiela and T.-Z

    P. Bargiela and T.-Z. Yang,Finite basis topologies for multiloop high-multiplicity Feynman integrals,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 096019 [2408.06325]. – 52 –

  70. [70]

    ’t Hooft and M.J.G

    G. ’t Hooft and M.J.G. Veltman,Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields,Nucl. Phys. B44(1972) 189

  71. [71]

    Adaptive Integrand Decomposition in parallel and orthogonal space

    P. Mastrolia, T. Peraro and A. Primo,Adaptive Integrand Decomposition in parallel and orthogonal space,JHEP08(2016) 164 [1605.03157]

  72. [72]

    Cuts of Feynman Integrals in Baikov representation

    H. Frellesvig and C.G. Papadopoulos,Cuts of Feynman Integrals in Baikov representation,JHEP04(2017) 083 [1701.07356]

  73. [73]

    Frellesvig,The loop-by-loop Baikov representation — Strategies and implementation,JHEP04(2025) 111 [2412.01804]

    H. Frellesvig,The loop-by-loop Baikov representation — Strategies and implementation,JHEP04(2025) 111 [2412.01804]

  74. [74]

    Sharpening The Leading Singularity

    F. Cachazo,Sharpening The Leading Singularity,0803.1988

  75. [75]

    Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J.L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo and J. Trnka,Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes,JHEP06(2012) 125 [1012.6032]

  76. [76]

    Schicho,Elementary Theory of Del Pezzo Surfaces, inComputational Methods for Algebraic Spline Surfaces, (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp

    J. Schicho,Elementary Theory of Del Pezzo Surfaces, inComputational Methods for Algebraic Spline Surfaces, (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 77–94, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005, DOI

  77. [77]

    Local mirror symmetry and the sunset Feynman integral

    S. Bloch, M. Kerr and P. Vanhove,Local mirror symmetry and the sunset Feynman integral,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.21(2017) 1373 [1601.08181]

  78. [78]

    Schimmrigk,Special Fano geometry from Feynman integrals,Phys

    R. Schimmrigk,Special Fano geometry from Feynman integrals,Phys. Lett. B864 (2025) 139420 [2412.20236]

  79. [79]

    de la Cruz, P.P

    L. de la Cruz, P.P. Novichkov and P. Vanhove,Fano and Reflexive Polytopes from Feynman Integrals,2512.10518

  80. [80]

    Green and T

    P. Green and T. Hubsch,Calabi-yau Manifolds as Complete Intersections in Products of Complex Projective Spaces,Commun. Math. Phys.109(1987) 99

Showing first 80 references.