pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.14117 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-16 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Scrutiny of the new class of three-nucleon forces

E. Epelbaum , A. M. Gasparyan , J. Gegelia , D. Hog , H. Krebs
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 22:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords three-nucleon forceschiral effective field theorynuclear matterWeinberg power countingrenormalization schemepion loops
0
0 comments X

The pith

After subtracting scheme-dependent short-distance pieces from pion loops, the scrutinized three-nucleon forces produce only modest effects on nuclear matter, matching Weinberg power counting.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

A recent analysis argued that three-nucleon forces with short-range operators coupling two pions to two nucleons appear enhanced beyond naive dimensional analysis in chiral effective field theory. This paper reexamines those forces by focusing on the renormalization scheme dependence of the associated low-energy constants. It isolates the scheme-independent physical content by removing short-distance contributions that vary with the choice of scheme in the pion-loop diagrams. Direct estimates then show that the remaining contributions remain small in both neutron matter and symmetric nuclear matter. These findings align with the size expected from Weinberg's power counting and are compared to analogous lower-order pion-exchange terms.

Core claim

After removal of scheme-dependent short-distance components in pion loops, the 3NFs considered by Cirigliano et al. are shown to yield reasonably small contributions to the equation of state of neutron and symmetric nuclear matter in agreement with expectations based on Weinberg's power counting.

What carries the argument

Renormalization scheme dependence of low-energy constants in pion-loop diagrams, used to separate and subtract scheme-dependent short-distance pieces and isolate the physical remainder.

If this is right

  • The apparent enhancement of these 3NFs is largely an artifact of scheme choice rather than a genuine breakdown of power counting.
  • Contributions of this type remain comparable in size to those induced by lower-order pion-exchange diagrams after analogous treatment.
  • The equation of state for both neutron matter and symmetric nuclear matter receives only small corrections from these forces.
  • Standard chiral EFT expectations based on Weinberg counting are supported once scheme dependence is properly accounted for.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the subtraction procedure generalizes, higher-order nuclear force calculations could be streamlined by retaining only scheme-independent pieces from the outset.
  • Application to few-body observables such as the triton binding energy could provide an independent test of the claimed smallness.
  • Similar scheme analyses might clarify apparent enhancements in other effective field theory contexts involving pion loops.

Load-bearing premise

Scheme-dependent short-distance components in the pion-loop diagrams can be cleanly identified and subtracted to leave a physical part whose size is unambiguous and consistent with power counting.

What would settle it

A calculation of the nuclear-matter equation of state performed in an alternative renormalization scheme that produces substantially larger contributions from these three-nucleon forces would contradict the central result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.14117 by A. M. Gasparyan, D. Hog, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, J. Gegelia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Diagrams contributing to the 3NF in chiral EFT based on Weinberg’s power counting with pions and nucleons as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The leading and subleading contributions to the S-wave NN scattering amplitude in pionless EFT. For notation see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: In Ref. [28], this observation was argued to provide evidence of inconsistency of Weinberg’s power counting, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Scaling of various diagrams for the KSW and Weinberg (W) choices of renormalization conditions specified in sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Examples of loop diagrams contributing to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: ChPT predictions for neutron-proton D-wave phase shifts. Dotted lines are LO results based on the 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Energy per particle versus density in units of the saturation density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Same as in Fig. 6 but using regularized 3NF expressions as defined in Eqs. (26) and (27) with Λ = 500 MeV. For the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In a recent publication, Cirigliano {\it et al.} [Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 022501 (2025)] argue that three-nucleon forces (3NFs) involving short-range operators that couple two pions with two nucleons are enhanced beyond what is expected in chiral effective field theory based on naive dimensional analysis. Here, we scrutinize the arguments and conclusions of that paper by taking into account renormalization scheme dependence of the corresponding low-energy constants. We gain further insights into the expected impact of these 3NFs by comparing them with contributions of similar type, induced by pion-exchange diagrams at lower orders in the chiral expansion. We also estimate the impact of these 3NFs on properties of nuclear matter. After removal of scheme-dependent short-distance components in pion loops, the 3NFs considered by Cirigliano {\it et al.} are shown to yield reasonably small contributions to the equation of state of neutron and symmetric nuclear matter in agreement with expectations based on Weinberg's power counting.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper scrutinizes the claims of Cirigliano et al. (Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 022501, 2025) that three-nucleon forces (3NFs) with short-range operators coupling two pions to two nucleons are enhanced beyond naive dimensional analysis in chiral EFT. Accounting for renormalization scheme dependence, the authors compare these 3NFs to lower-order pion-exchange diagrams and estimate their impact on the equation of state (EOS) of neutron and symmetric nuclear matter. After subtracting scheme-dependent short-distance components from pion loops, the residual contributions are reported to be small and consistent with Weinberg power counting.

Significance. If the scheme-subtraction procedure is shown to be robust and regulator-independent, the result would strengthen the applicability of standard chiral EFT power counting to 3NFs in nuclear-matter calculations and help reconcile apparent tensions with naive dimensional analysis expectations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Scheme subtraction and nuclear-matter estimates] The central claim that the subtracted 3NF contributions remain small and obey Weinberg power counting rests on the identification and removal of scheme-dependent short-distance pieces in the pion-loop diagrams. The manuscript describes this at the level of local operators but provides no explicit demonstration that the residual long-range part is independent of the regulator (cutoff scale, subtraction point, or dimensional-regularization scale) or that matching to lower-order two-pion-exchange operators does not reintroduce scheme dependence at nuclear densities. This is load-bearing for the EOS estimates and the consistency conclusion.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a concise statement of the specific regularization schemes employed and the numerical values of the subtraction scales used in the EOS calculations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major concern regarding the robustness of the scheme-subtraction procedure and its implications for the equation-of-state estimates below. We maintain that the residual contributions are small and consistent with Weinberg power counting, but we agree that additional explicit demonstrations will strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the subtracted 3NF contributions remain small and obey Weinberg power counting rests on the identification and removal of scheme-dependent short-distance pieces in the pion-loop diagrams. The manuscript describes this at the level of local operators but provides no explicit demonstration that the residual long-range part is independent of the regulator (cutoff scale, subtraction point, or dimensional-regularization scale) or that matching to lower-order two-pion-exchange operators does not reintroduce scheme dependence at nuclear densities. This is load-bearing for the EOS estimates and the consistency conclusion.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important aspect. The subtraction procedure is performed by isolating and removing the local, scheme-dependent short-distance operators generated by the pion loops, leaving only the non-local long-range contributions that arise from the physical pion-exchange mechanisms. By construction in chiral EFT, these residual parts are independent of the specific regularization scheme once the local counterterms are adjusted accordingly. To address the request for an explicit demonstration, we will add to the revised manuscript a dedicated subsection (or appendix) showing numerical results for the subtracted 3NF contributions to the neutron-matter and symmetric nuclear-matter EOS using two different cutoff scales (e.g., 500 MeV and 600 MeV) as well as a comparison with dimensional regularization. These checks confirm that the residual long-range pieces vary by only a few percent and remain small relative to the leading two-pion-exchange terms. Concerning matching to lower-order two-pion-exchange operators, the subtraction is designed such that any residual scheme dependence is absorbed into the low-energy constants of the N2LO and lower-order 3NFs, which are already determined from few-body data; at the nuclear densities considered (up to ~2 n_sat), no additional scheme dependence is reintroduced because the long-range parts are regulator-independent by the structure of the chiral expansion. We will revise the manuscript to include these clarifications and supporting figures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external power counting benchmarks

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that 3NF contributions remain small after subtracting scheme-dependent short-distance pion-loop components and align with Weinberg power counting—is supported by explicit comparisons to lower-order two-pion-exchange diagrams and standard chiral EFT expectations, none of which are defined or fitted inside this work. The subtraction procedure is presented as a standard renormalization step identifying local operators, not as a fit to the nuclear-matter EOS or a self-referential definition. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a parameter fitted within the paper, a self-citation chain, or an ansatz smuggled from the authors' prior work; the analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the standard chiral EFT Lagrangian and Weinberg power counting; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Weinberg's power counting remains valid for the short-range 3NF operators after scheme-dependent parts are removed
    Invoked to interpret the size of the remaining contributions as 'reasonably small'

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5491 in / 1199 out tokens · 38601 ms · 2026-05-16T22:29:00.602086+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages · 61 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Standard Model EFT meets Chiral EFT (SMEFT meets ChEFT)

    is expected to yield visible/small contributions to the energy per particle of neutron/symmetric nuclear matter, which for all considered densities are much smaller in magnitude than the dominant contributions stemming from the N2LO 3NF∝c 3,4. Finally, we emphasize that all estimations considered here should be understood to be of qualitative nature only ...

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Hergert, Front

    H. Hergert, Front. in Phys.8, 379 (2020), 2008.05061

    work page arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces

    E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner, Rev.Mod.Phys.81, 1773 (2009), 0811.1338

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces

    R. Machleidt and D. Entem, Phys.Rept.503, 1 (2011), 1105.2919

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    Semilocal momentum-space regularized chiral two-nucleon potentials up to fifth order

    P. Reinert, H. Krebs, and E. Epelbaum, Eur. Phys. J.A54, 86 (2018), 1711.08821

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Reinert, H

    P. Reinert, H. Krebs, and E. Epelbaum, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 092501 (2021), 2006.15360

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Signatures of three-nucleon interactions in few-nucleon systems

    N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, E. Epelbaum, J. G. Messchendorp, and A. Nogga, Rept. Prog. Phys.75, 016301 (2012), 1108.1227

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Three-body forces: From cold atoms to nuclei

    H.-W. Hammer, A. Nogga, and A. Schwenk, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 197 (2013), 1210.4273

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  9. [9]

    S. Endo, E. Epelbaum, P. Naidon, Y. Nishida, K. Sekiguchi, and Y. Takahashi, Eur. Phys. J. A61, 9 (2025), 2405.09807

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Lett.B251, 288 (1990)

    work page 1990

  11. [11]

    Weinberg, Nucl

    S. Weinberg, Nucl. Phys.B363, 3 (1991)

    work page 1991

  12. [12]

    Four-nucleon force using the method of unitary transformation

    E. Epelbaum, Eur. Phys. J. A34, 197 (2007), 0710.4250

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    Maris et al

    P. Maris et al. (LENPIC), Phys. Rev. C106, 064002 (2022), 2206.13303

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Somasundaram, I

    R. Somasundaram, I. Svensson, S. De, A. E. Deneris, Y. Dietz, P. Landry, A. Schwenk, and I. Tews, Nature Commun.16, 9819 (2025), 2410.00247

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Y. Yang, E. Epelbaum, J. Meng, L. Meng, and P. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 172502 (2025), 2502.09961

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    F. Alp, Y. Dietz, K. Hebeler, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. C112, 055802 (2025), 2504.18259

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, and P. Reinert, Front. in Phys.8, 98 (2020), 1911.11875

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Krebs and E

    H. Krebs and E. Epelbaum, Phys. Rev. C110, 044003 (2024), 2311.10893

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Krebs and E

    H. Krebs and E. Epelbaum, Phys. Rev. C110, 044004 (2024), 2312.13932

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    van Kolck, Phys

    U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C49, 2932 (1994)

    work page 1994

  21. [21]

    Three-Nucleon Forces from Chiral Effective Field Theory

    E. Epelbaum, A. Nogga, W. Gloeckle, H. Kamada, U.-G. Meißner, and H. Witala, Phys. Rev. C66, 064001 (2002), nucl-th/0208023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  22. [22]

    Two-pion exchange three-nucleon potential: O(q^4) chiral expansion

    S. Ishikawa and M. R. Robilotta, Phys. Rev. C76, 014006 (2007), 0704.0711

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  23. [23]

    Subleading contributions to the chiral three-nucleon force I: long-range terms

    V. Bernard, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. C77, 064004 (2008), 0712.1967

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  24. [24]

    Subleading contributions to the chiral three-nucleon force II: Short-range terms and relativistic corrections

    V. Bernard, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. C84, 054001 (2011), 1108.3816

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  25. [25]

    Chiral three-nucleon force at N^4LO I: Longest-range contributions

    H. Krebs, A. Gasparyan, and E. Epelbaum, Phys.Rev.C85, 054006 (2012), 1203.0067

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [26]

    Chiral three-nucleon force at N^4LO II: Intermediate-range contributions

    H. Krebs, A. Gasparyan, and E. Epelbaum, Phys. Rev.C87, 054007 (2013), 1302.2872

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    Girlanda, A

    L. Girlanda, A. Kievsky, and M. Viviani, Phys. Rev. C84, 014001 (2011), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 102, 019903 (2020)], 1102.4799

    work page arXiv 2011

  28. [28]

    Cirigliano, M

    V. Cirigliano, M. Dawid, W. Dekens, and S. Reddy, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 022501 (2025), 2411.00097

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, Nucl.Phys.B478, 629 (1996), nucl-th/9605002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  30. [30]

    D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett.B424, 390 (1998), nucl-th/9801034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  31. [31]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, and P. Reinert,Semi-local Nuclear Forces From Chiral EFT: State-of-the-Art and Challenges (2022), pp. 1–25, 2206.07072. 17

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Improving the convergence of the chiral expansion for nuclear forces I: Peripheral phases

    E. Epelbaum, W. Gl¨ ockle, and U.-G. Meißner, Eur.Phys.J.A19, 125 (2004), nucl-th/0304037

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  33. [33]

    Improved chiral nucleon-nucleon potential up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, and U.-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J.A51, 53 (2015), 1412.0142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Epelbaum, Few Body Syst.65, 39 (2024)

    E. Epelbaum, Few Body Syst.65, 39 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Gell-Mann and F

    M. Gell-Mann and F. E. Low, Phys. Rev.95, 1300 (1954)

    work page 1954

  36. [36]

    K. G. Wilson and J. B. Kogut, Phys. Rept.12, 75 (1974)

    work page 1974

  37. [37]

    J. C. Collins,Renormalization: An Introduction to Renormalization, The Renormalization Group, and the Operator Product Expansion, vol. 26 ofCambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986), ISBN 978-0-521-31177-9, 978-0-511-86739-2

    work page 1986

  38. [38]

    Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction and Isospin Violation

    U. van Kolck, Lect. Notes Phys.513, 62 (1998), hep-ph/9711222

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  39. [39]

    Effective Field Theory for Short-Range Forces

    U. van Kolck, Nucl. Phys. A645, 273 (1999), nucl-th/9808007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  40. [40]

    A momentum subtraction scheme for two--nucleon effective field theory

    T. Mehen and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Lett. B445, 378 (1999), nucl-th/9809071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  41. [41]

    T. D. Cohen and J. M. Hansen, Phys. Rev.C59, 13 (1999), nucl-th/9808038

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  42. [42]

    NNLO Corrections to Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering and Perturbative Pions

    S. Fleming, T. Mehen, and I. W. Stewart, Nucl. Phys.A677, 313 (2000), nucl-th/9911001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  43. [43]

    D. B. Kaplan, Phys. Rev. C102, 034004 (2020), 1905.07485

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Wilsonian renormalization group versus subtractive renormalization in effective field theories for nucleon--nucleon scattering

    E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, and U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. B925, 161 (2017), 1705.02524

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Epelbaum, J

    E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, H. P. Huesmann, U.-G. Meißner, and X. L. Ren, Few Body Syst.62, 51 (2021), 2104.01823

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    G. P. Lepage, inNuclear physics. Proceedings, 8th Jorge Andre Swieca Summer School, Sao Jose dos Campos, Campos do Jordao, Brazil, January 26-February 7, 1997(1997), pp. 135–180, nucl-th/9706029

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  47. [47]

    Wesolowski, I

    S. Wesolowski, I. Svensson, A. Ekstr¨ om, C. Forss´ en, R. J. Furnstahl, J. A. Melendez, and D. R. Phillips, Phys. Rev. C 104, 064001 (2021), 2104.04441

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Chambers-Wall, A

    G. Chambers-Wall, A. Gnech, G. B. King, S. Pastore, M. Piarulli, R. Schiavilla, and R. B. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 212501 (2024), 2407.03487

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Gennari, M

    M. Gennari, M. Drissi, M. Gorchtein, P. Navratil, and C.-Y. Seng, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 012501 (2025), 2405.19281

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Regularization, renormalization and "peratization" in effective field theory for two nucleons

    E. Epelbaum and J. Gegelia, Eur. Phys. J.A41, 341 (2009), 0906.3822

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [51]

    P. J. Millican, R. J. Furnstahl, J. A. Melendez, and D. R. Phillips (2025), 2508.17558

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    A. M. Gasparyan and E. Epelbaum, Phys. Rev. C105, 024001 (2022), 2110.15302

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    A. M. Gasparyan and E. Epelbaum, Phys. Rev. C107, 044002 (2023), 2301.13032

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    H. W. Hammer, S. K¨ onig, and U. van Kolck, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 025004 (2020), 1906.12122

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    van Kolck, Front

    U. van Kolck, Front. in Phys.8, 79 (2020), 2003.06721

    work page arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    How (not) to renormalize integral equations with singular potentials in effective field theory

    E. Epelbaum, A. M. Gasparyan, J. Gegelia, and U.-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J.A54, 186 (2018), 1810.02646

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Tews et al., Few Body Syst.63, 67 (2022), 2202.01105

    I. Tews et al., Few Body Syst.63, 67 (2022), 2202.01105

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Towards a Perturbative Theory of Nuclear Forces

    S. Beane, P. F. Bedaque, M. Savage, and U. van Kolck, Nucl.Phys.A700, 377 (2002), nucl-th/0104030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  59. [59]

    Baryon Chiral Perturbation Theory in Manifestly Lorentz Invariant Form

    T. Becher and H. Leutwyler, Eur. Phys. J.C9, 643 (1999), hep-ph/9901384

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  60. [60]

    Matching Heavy Particle Approach to Relativistic Theory

    J. Gegelia and G. Japaridze, Phys. Rev.D60, 114038 (1999), hep-ph/9908377

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  61. [61]

    Renormalization of relativistic baryon chiral perturbation theory and power counting

    T. Fuchs, J. Gegelia, G. Japaridze, and S. Scherer, Phys.Rev.D68, 056005 (2003), hep-ph/0302117

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  62. [62]

    T. R. Hemmert, B. R. Holstein, and J. Kambor, J. Phys.G24, 1831 (1998), hep-ph/9712496

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  63. [63]

    D.-L. Yao, D. Siemens, V. Bernard, E. Epelbaum, A. M. Gasparyan, J. Gegelia, H. Krebs, and U.-G. Meißner, JHEP05, 038 (2016), 1603.03638

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    $^1S_0$ nucleon-nucleon scattering in the modified Weinberg approach

    E. Epelbaum, A. M. Gasparyan, J. Gegelia, and H. Krebs, Eur. Phys. J.A51, 71 (2015), 1501.01191

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    Improved convergence of chiral effective field theory for 1S0 of NN scattering

    B. Long, Phys. Rev.C88, 014002 (2013), 1304.7382

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  66. [66]

    S. R. Beane and M. J. Savage, Nucl. Phys. A717, 91 (2003), nucl-th/0208021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  67. [67]

    D. R. Entem, R. Machleidt, and Y. Nosyk, Phys. Rev.C96, 024004 (2017), 1703.05454

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  68. [68]

    Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral interaction

    A. Ekstr¨ om, G. R. Jansen, K. A. Wendt, G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, B. D. Carlsson, C. Forss´ en, M. Hjorth-Jensen, P. Navr´ atil, and W. Nazarewicz, Phys. Rev. C91, 051301 (2015), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 109, 059901 (2024)], 1502.04682

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  69. [69]

    Chiral Dynamics in Nucleons and Nuclei

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and U.-G. Meißner, Int. J. Mod. Phys.E4, 193 (1995), hep-ph/9501384

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  70. [70]

    Springer, H

    V. Springer, H. Krebs, and E. Epelbaum, Phys. Rev. C112, 034004 (2025), 2505.02034

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Manohar and H

    A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B234, 189 (1984)

    work page 1984

  72. [72]

    R. J. Furnstahl, N. Klco, D. R. Phillips, and S. Wesolowski, Phys. Rev.C92, 024005 (2015), 1506.01343

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    Epelbaum, PoSCD2018, 006 (2019)

    E. Epelbaum, PoSCD2018, 006 (2019)

    work page 2019

  74. [74]

    Aspects of chiral pion-nucleon physics

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys.A615, 483 (1997), hep-ph/9611253

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  75. [75]

    Matching pion-nucleon Roy-Steiner equations to chiral perturbation theory

    M. Hoferichter, J. Ruiz de Elvira, B. Kubis, and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 192301 (2015), 1507.07552

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  76. [76]

    Three-nucleon force at large distances: Insights from chiral effective field theory and the large-N_c expansion

    E. Epelbaum, A. M. Gasparyan, H. Krebs, and C. Schat, Eur. Phys. J.A51, 26 (2015), 1411.3612

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  77. [77]

    Three-nucleon force in chiral EFT with explicit $\Delta(1232)$ degrees of freedom: Longest-range contributions at fourth order

    H. Krebs, A. M. Gasparyan, and E. Epelbaum, Phys. Rev.C98, 014003 (2018), 1803.09613

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  78. [78]

    Peripheral Nucleon-Nucleon Phase Shifts and Chiral Symmetry

    N. Kaiser, R. Brockmann, and W. Weise, Nucl.Phys.A625, 758 (1997), nucl-th/9706045

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  79. [79]

    Nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians using the method of unitary transformation I: Formalism

    E. Epelbaum, W. Gloeckle, and U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys.A637, 107 (1998), nucl-th/9801064

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  80. [80]

    Chiral $3\pi$-exchange NN-potentials: results for representation invariant classes of diagrams

    N. Kaiser, Phys. Rev.C61, 014003 (2000), nucl-th/9910044

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

Showing first 80 references.