Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

A black hole's logarithmic tidal response is computable by pure algebra from the perturbation equation, and any slight deformation of Schwarzschild or Reissner–Nordström must produce nonzero logarithmic Love numbers at some multipole.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 14:50 UTC pith:JHYS36QX

load-bearing objection Solid Fuchsian method and single-term theorems, but the proof of the universal running claim breaks at Eq. (55), which contradicts Theorem 1 and the paper's own counterexample. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2512.19111 v3 pith:JHYS36QX submitted 2025-12-22 gr-qc hep-th

On the logarithmic Love number of black holes beyond general relativity

Sebastian Garcia-Saenz , Hongbo Lin This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th
keywords logarithmic Love numberstidal responseblack holesFuchsian theorymodified gravityregular black holesperturbative deformationscale running
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper pins down the logarithmic part of black hole tidal Love numbers — the coefficient that makes the response depend on scale — as a purely algebraic output of the equation governing the perturbation. The authors derive a closed formula that computes this coefficient from the first few Taylor coefficients of the equation, with no need to solve the equation or match special functions. Armed with the formula, they prove that any static, spherically symmetric spacetime that is a small deformation of Schwarzschild or Reissner–Nordström — including all familiar regular black hole metrics — must have nonzero logarithmic running at some multipole order, with a predictable sign. They also show the assumption of perturbativity is decisive: a deliberately non-perturbative metric can have exactly zero running at every multipole. Along the way the formula reproduces the known higher-dimensional and Hayward results and yields new ones.

Core claim

In plain terms: the coefficient that measures the logarithmic 'running' of a black hole's tidal response is not buried in a special-function solution — it is a finite, purely algebraic function of the first 2l+1 Taylor coefficients of the perturbation equation. The master formula gives a0(l) = (1/(2l+1)) Σ_{m=0}^{2l} [(m−l−1)p_{2l+1−m} + q_{2l+1−m}] b_m, with the b_m determined recursively. Applying this to any static, spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat metric of the form f=g=1−x(1+Σ_N α_N x^N), the paper proves that perturbative deformations of Schwarzschild or Reissner–Nordström must have a0 ≠ 0 for some multipole order, with the sign of the leading term set by the order N. It furt

What carries the argument

Fuchsian analysis of a second-order linear ODE at a regular singular point (spatial infinity, x=0). The two indicial exponents differ by an integer (2l+1), so a logarithmic solution necessarily appears; the Frobenius recurrence plus the normalization that fixes the log branch yields the master formula (19). The same machinery applies both to the scalar Klein-Gordon equation and to the odd-parity modified Regge-Wheeler equation of the scalar-tensor EFT, with the same formula but different p_n, q_n.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a 'perturbative' deformation means the metric functions expand as 1−x(1+Σ α_N x^N) and stay uniformly close to Schwarzschild or Reissner–Nordström throughout the exterior; drop that closeness and the paper's own counterexample shows zero running reappears.

What would settle it

A concrete check: compute a0(2) for the counter-example metric f=1−x−α x^4/(1−x) using the master formula; the paper's linear-system proposition (55) forces a0(2) ∝ α, so the recursion either confirms or overturns the claimed zero running.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Any regular black hole metric that is a small deformation of Schwarzschild or Reissner–Nordström (e.g., Bardeen, Simpson-Visser, Hayward) necessarily has nonzero logarithmic running at some multipole order, with a sign fixed by the order of the deformation.
  • The vanishing thresholds are concrete: for scalar perturbations with f=g=1−x(1+α x^N), the running vanishes at order α exactly when N=1 or l≤⌊(N−1)/2⌋; in particular, Hayward's l=2,3 running vanishes and the first nonzero term appears at l=4.
  • For odd-parity gravitational perturbations in the scalar-tensor EFT, leading-order running requires the metric deformation to start at N≥4 or the gravitational-wave-speed deviation at M≥5, so many regular black hole models show no running until higher multipoles.
  • In higher dimensions, the known condition for nonzero running (l/(d−3) a half-integer) is recovered as an immediate algebraic consequence of the master formula.
  • Without the perturbativity assumption, zero running for all multipoles is possible — the paper gives an explicit, singular, non-perturbative example — so running is not a universal marker of beyond-GR physics, only of perturbative deformations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the formula needs only the first 2l+1 Taylor coefficients of the metric functions, it applies to any metric given as a series — including numerical spacetimes with fitted series — turning log-Love-number prediction into a quick consistency check for candidate modified-gravity black holes.
  • The threshold rules suggest a direct observational strategy: a detected nonzero log-running at low multipoles would pin down the order N at which the deformation of GR begins, complementing constraints from the speed of gravitational waves (α_T).
  • The existence of zero-running but non-perturbative metrics hints that nonzero running is not a marker of 'modified gravity' per se but of metrics that are smooth deformations of GR in the exterior; a natural next step, which the paper does not take, is to test whether the zero-running metric admits a hidden ladder-type symmetry in the dual near-zone metric — a check that could unify the running-ba

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Fuchsian ODE method for computing the logarithmic (running) Love number a0(l) directly from the Taylor coefficients p_n, q_n of the perturbation equation, via Eq. (19), thereby bypassing the need for explicit full solutions. The method is applied to static probe scalar perturbations and to odd-parity tensor perturbations in a scalar-tensor EFT, and it is checked against known Schwarzschild-Tangherlini and Hayward results. The central claim is that any static, spherically symmetric spacetime that is a perturbative deformation of Schwarzschild or Reissner-Nordström must have non-vanishing logarithmic Love numbers for some multipole, while an explicit non-perturbative metric is offered as a counterexample with exactly zero running.

Significance. The master formula is genuinely useful: it is explicit, involves no fitted parameters, and the paper demonstrates its efficiency by reproducing published results from [6] and [36], as well as providing apparently new Hayward results at l=5. Theorems 1 and 2 give clean, checkable sufficient conditions for vanishing of a0 for single-term deformations, and these parts appear sound and are credibly grounded in the recurrence structure. The broader claim in the abstract, however, depends critically on the infinite-system argument in Sec. IIIB3. That argument contains an internal inconsistency, as detailed below. Since the paper's advertised universal statement is not established by the proof as written, this is not a minor presentation issue. The local results remain valuable and may be salvageable if the general-deformation argument is repaired or if the abstract is appropriately weakened.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IIIB3, Eq. (55)] Equation (55) is not a valid consequence of a0(l')=0 for l'=2. For l'=2, the sum runs over m=3,4 but the m=3 term vanishes because binom(0,1)=0; hence the equation reduces to α4=0. However, Theorem 1 with N=3 states that a0(2) is proportional to α3 at linear order, so any necessary condition for a0(2)=0 must involve α3. Thus Eq. (55) cannot be the full linear system encoding the constraints. The claim that the system is upper triangular with unique zero solution is therefore unsupported, and the proof of the abstract's universal statement breaks at this point. A derivation or a corrected form of Eq. (55) is needed.
  2. [Sec. IIIB3, Eq. (56)] The proposed zero-running counterexample α2=0, α3=α4=...=α is internally inconsistent with Eq. (55). Since α4≠0, the condition displayed in Eq. (55) at l'=2 is violated. The paper therefore does not actually exhibit a non-perturbative metric with exactly zero logarithmic Love numbers for all multipoles. This is load-bearing because the existence of such a counterexample is used to justify the claim that the perturbativity assumption is essential. The counterexample must be re-examined once Eq. (55) is corrected.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IVA2] Typo: 'it is necessary and sufficient that M≥5 and l≥ ... to have to have a0(θ)≠0' contains a duplicated phrase 'to have to have'.
  2. [Sec. IVA3, footnote 8] The Hayward metric in Eq. (61) contains a deformation at O(x^0) in f, so the statement that it falls into the case N=M=3 is not literally correct. The footnote acknowledges this, but the relation to the preceding perturbative classification should be clarified.
  3. [Sec. IIB, Eq. (19)] The notation p_n, q_n, b_n does not explicitly carry the multipole index l, although these quantities are implicitly l-dependent. Adding an l label or stating the convention explicitly would improve readability.
  4. [Sec. IIIB3] The proposition leading to Eq. (55) is introduced as 'Through direct calculation', but no derivation or appendix reference is provided. Given that this proposition is central, the derivation should either be displayed or moved to an appendix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the logarithmic Love number formula is a direct Frobenius-theory derivation and is validated against external benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's central result, Eq. (19), derives the logarithmic Love number a0(l) from the Taylor coefficients p_n, q_n of the perturbation equation via the Fuchsian recurrence (20). This is a mathematical derivation, not a restatement of its inputs: a0 is fixed by Eq. (12)/(14), and the auxiliary coefficients b_m are determined recursively from the same ODE coefficients. Nothing in the derivation assumes a non-zero or zero a0. The Schwarzschild limit is computed as a non-trivial check (a0^(0)=0), and the Schwarzschild-Tangherlini and Hayward results are checked against independent published calculations [6,29,36], which are not by the current authors. The claim that perturbative deformations must have non-zero logarithmic running is presented as a consequence of the recurrence analysis, not as an input; the paper even identifies the perturbativity assumption as essential and gives a non-perturbative counterexample. The discussion's references to Ref. [71] and [72] are contextual corroboration, not load-bearing self-citations, and the authors do not rely on their own prior work to establish the central formula. The skeptical concern about the internal consistency of Eq. (55) is a correctness or rigor issue about a specific proposition, not a circularity: no step reduces by construction to its own conclusion. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no new entities. It relies on standard Fuchsian theory, on the static spherically-symmetric metric ansatz with analyticity at infinity, on the scalar-tensor EFT Regge-Wheeler equation borrowed from [46], and on the perturbativity of the deformation as the key scope condition.

axioms (4)
  • standard math Fuchsian/Frobenius theory: a second-order ODE with a regular singular point has solutions of Frobenius form; if indicial exponents differ by an integer, logarithm terms appear.
    Basis for the master formula Eq. (14)/(19), Sec. IIA.
  • domain assumption The metric is static, spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat and analytic at infinity, so f,g admit the power series (16) and Eq. (18) has a regular singular point at x=0.
    Scope of all derivations; Sec. IIB.
  • domain assumption The deformation is 'perturbative': f=g=1−x(1+Σ α_N x^N) with small coefficients uniformly on the exterior domain, and odd-parity tensor perturbations are governed by the scalar-tensor EFT modified Regge-Wheeler equation (27) of [46].
    Defines the class for Theorems 1–2 and Sec. IV; also the key scope condition that the counterexample is meant to violate.
  • domain assumption For the Hayward example, f, α_T, F are given by (61) and the EFT equation is the correct perturbation equation.
    Model input from [36]; used to produce exact a0(l).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 20746 in / 31889 out tokens · 282987 ms · 2026-08-03T14:50:25.724059+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Tidal Love numbers and other response coefficients of black holes sometimes exhibit a logarithmic dependence on scale, or 'running'. We clarify that this coefficient is directly calculable from the structure of the equation obeyed by the field perturbation, and requires no knowledge of the full solution. The derived formula allows us to establish some general results on the existence of logarithmic running. In particular, we show that any static and spherically symmetric spacetime that modifies the Schwarzschild or Reissner-Nordstr\"om solutions in a perturbative way must have non-zero logarithmic Love numbers. This applies for instance to all regular black hole metrics. On the other hand, our analysis highlights the importance of the perturbativity assumption: without it, we find explicit black hole solutions beyond general relativity with exactly zero running. We also illustrate the advantage of our method by recovering and extending the known results for the Hayward metric.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Axial tidal Love numbers of black holes in matter environments

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Axial tidal Love numbers for black holes in anisotropic fluid environments are derived analytically and numerically, with non-compact support density profiles producing logarithmic terms that obstruct standard tidal m...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The metric defined by (33) should be interpreted as a truncation of a generically infinite Taylor series, so that our results will be valid toO(α)

    Single-term deformation withf=g We begin with a study of line elements withf=gand assume the metric to be perturbatively close to the Schwarzschild metric everywhere outside the event horizon, in the sense that f=g= 1−x 1 +αx N ,(33) whereNis a positive integer andαis a small parameter, such that|α|x N ≪1everywhere in the domain of interest. The metric de...

  2. [2]

    If we consider metrics with7 f= 1−x 1 +αx N , g= 1−x 1 +βx M ,(50) then a generalization of Theorem 2 holds

    Single-term deformation withf̸=g The assumptionf=gis inessential for our main result concerning the vanishing ofa0 at leading order in the metric deformation. If we consider metrics with7 f= 1−x 1 +αx N , g= 1−x 1 +βx M ,(50) then a generalization of Theorem 2 holds. We find that the coefficient ofαrβs in the sum of (20) is modified to B(r,s) n,m,l,N,M :=...

  3. [3]

    f= 1−x 1 + ∞X N=1 αN xN ! , g= 1−x 1 + ∞X N=1 βN xN ! ,(52) we have not been able to find closed-form expressions for the corresponding coefficientspn and qn

    General deformation withf=g Given a metric with arbitrary functionsfandg, which we only assume to be analytic, i.e. f= 1−x 1 + ∞X N=1 αN xN ! , g= 1−x 1 + ∞X N=1 βN xN ! ,(52) we have not been able to find closed-form expressions for the corresponding coefficientspn and qn. Nevertheless, we can still draw some general conclusions on the logarithmic Love n...

  4. [4]

    Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars.Astrophys

    Tanja Hinderer. Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars.Astrophys. J., 677:1216–1220, 2008. [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 697, 964 (2009)].arXiv:0711.2420,doi:10.1086/533487

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars.Phys

    Thibault Damour and Alessandro Nagar. Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars.Phys. Rev. D, 80:084035, 2009.arXiv:0906.0096,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084035

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers.Phys

    Taylor Binnington and Eric Poisson. Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers.Phys. Rev. D, 80:084018, 2009.arXiv:0906.1366,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    Flanagan and Tanja Hinderer

    Eanna E. Flanagan and Tanja Hinderer. Constraining neutron star tidal Love numbers with gravita- tional wave detectors.Phys. Rev. D, 77:021502, 2008.arXiv:0709.1915,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77. 021502

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Testing strong- field gravity with tidal Love numbers.Phys

    Vitor Cardoso, Edgardo Franzin, Andrea Maselli, Paolo Pani, and Guilherme Raposo. Testing strong- field gravity with tidal Love numbers.Phys. Rev. D, 95(8):084014, 2017. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 089901 (2017)].arXiv:1701.01116,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.084014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Lam Hui, Austin Joyce, Riccardo Penco, Luca Santoni, and Adam R. Solomon. Static response and Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes.JCAP, 04:052, 2021.arXiv:2010.00593,doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2021/04/052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Tidal Love Numbers of Kerr Black Holes.Phys

    Alexandre Le Tiec, Marc Casals, and Edgardo Franzin. Tidal Love Numbers of Kerr Black Holes.Phys. Rev. D, 103(8):084021, 2021.arXiv:2010.15795,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.084021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Spinning Black Holes Fall in Love.Phys

    Alexandre Le Tiec and Marc Casals. Spinning Black Holes Fall in Love.Phys. Rev. Lett., 126(13):131102, 2021.arXiv:2007.00214,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.131102

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes.Phys

    Horng Sheng Chia. Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 104(2):024013, 2021.arXiv:2010.07300,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.024013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Tidally induced multipole moments of a nonrotating black hole vanish to all post- Newtonian orders.Phys

    Eric Poisson. Tidally induced multipole moments of a nonrotating black hole vanish to all post- Newtonian orders.Phys. Rev. D, 104(10):104062, 2021.arXiv:2108.07328,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 104.104062

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Panagiotis Charalambous, Sergei Dubovsky, and Mikhail M. Ivanov. On the Vanishing of Love Numbers for Kerr Black Holes.JHEP, 05:038, 2021.arXiv:2102.08917,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)038

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Goldberger and Ira Z

    Walter D. Goldberger and Ira Z. Rothstein. An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects. Phys. Rev. D, 73:104029, 2006.arXiv:hep-th/0409156,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.104029

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  16. [16]

    Goldberger

    Walter D. Goldberger. Les Houches lectures on effective field theories and gravitational radiation. In Les Houches Summer School - Session 86: Particle Physics and Cosmology: The Fabric of Spacetime, 1 2007.arXiv:hep-ph/0701129

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    Rothstein

    Ira Z. Rothstein. Progress in effective field theory approach to the binary inspiral problem.Gen. Rel. Grav., 46:1726, 2014.doi:10.1007/s10714-014-1726-y. 25

    doi:10.1007/s10714-014-1726-y 2014

  18. [18]

    Rafael A. Porto. The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics.Phys. Rept., 633:1– 104, 2016.arXiv:1601.04914,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Rafael A. Porto. The Tune of Love and the Nature(ness) of Spacetime.Fortsch. Phys., 64(10):723–729, 2016.arXiv:1606.08895,doi:10.1002/prop.201600064

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Robert F. Penna. Near-horizon Carroll symmetry and black hole Love numbers. 12 2018.arXiv: 1812.05643

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Panagiotis Charalambous, Sergei Dubovsky, and Mikhail M. Ivanov. Hidden Symmetry of Van- ishing Love Numbers.Phys. Rev. Lett., 127(10):101101, 2021.arXiv:2103.01234,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.127.101101

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Lam Hui, Austin Joyce, Riccardo Penco, Luca Santoni, and Adam R. Solomon. Ladder symmetries of black holes. Implications for love numbers and no-hair theorems.JCAP, 01(01):032, 2022.arXiv: 2105.01069,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/01/032

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Lam Hui, Austin Joyce, Riccardo Penco, Luca Santoni, and Adam R. Solomon. Near-zone symmetries of Kerr black holes.JHEP, 09:049, 2022.arXiv:2203.08832,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)049

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Livine, Shinji Mukohyama, and Jean-Philippe Uzan

    Jibril Ben Achour, Etera R. Livine, Shinji Mukohyama, and Jean-Philippe Uzan. Hidden symmetry of the static response of black holes: applications to Love numbers.JHEP, 07:112, 2022.arXiv: 2202.12828,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)112

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Panagiotis Charalambous, Sergei Dubovsky, and Mikhail M. Ivanov. Love symmetry.JHEP, 10:175, 2022.arXiv:2209.02091,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)175

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Solomon, and Sam S

    Oscar Combaluzier-Szteinsznaider, Lam Hui, Luca Santoni, Adam R. Solomon, and Sam S. C. Wong. Symmetries of vanishing nonlinear Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes.JHEP, 03:124, 2025. arXiv:2410.10952,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2025)124

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Ladder symmetries and Love numbers of Reissner-Nordström black holes

    Mudit Rai and Luca Santoni. Ladder symmetries and Love numbers of Reissner-Nordström black holes. JHEP, 07:098, 2024.arXiv:2404.06544,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)098

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    TidalLovenumbersofanalogblack holes.Phys

    ValerioDeLuca, BrandonKhek, JustinKhoury, andMarkTrodden. TidalLovenumbersofanalogblack holes.Phys. Rev. D, 111(4):044069, 2025.arXiv:2412.08728,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.044069

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Geometric Sym- metries for the Vanishing of the Black Hole Tidal Love Numbers

    Roman Berens, Lam Hui, Daniel McLoughlin, Riccardo Penco, and John Staunton. Geometric Sym- metries for the Vanishing of the Black Hole Tidal Love Numbers. 10 2025.arXiv:2510.18952

    arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Naturalness of vanishing black-hole tides

    Julio Parra-Martinez and Alessandro Podo. Naturalness of vanishing black-hole tides. 10 2025.arXiv: 2510.20694

    arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Hidden symmetries for tidal Love numbers: generalities and applications to analogue black holes

    Valerio De Luca, Brandon Khek, Justin Khoury, and Mark Trodden. Hidden symmetries for tidal Love numbers: generalities and applications to analogue black holes. 12 2025.arXiv:2512.06082

    arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Black hole stereotyping: Induced gravito-static polarization.JHEP, 02:010, 2012.arXiv:1110.3764,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2012)010

    Barak Kol and Michael Smolkin. Black hole stereotyping: Induced gravito-static polarization.JHEP, 02:010, 2012.arXiv:1110.3764,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2012)010

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  33. [33]

    Ivanov and Zihan Zhou

    Mikhail M. Ivanov and Zihan Zhou. Revisiting the matching of black hole tidal responses: A systematic studyofrelativisticandlogarithmiccorrections.Phys. Rev. D,107(8):084030, 2023.arXiv:2208.08459, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.084030. 26

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    M. V. S. Saketh, Zihan Zhou, and Mikhail M. Ivanov. Dynamical tidal response of Kerr black holes from scattering amplitudes.Phys. Rev. D, 109(6):064058, 2024.arXiv:2307.10391,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.109.064058

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Mandal, Pierpaolo Mastrolia, Hector O

    Manoj K. Mandal, Pierpaolo Mastrolia, Hector O. Silva, Raj Patil, and Jan Steinhoff. Renormalizing Love: tidal effects at the third post-Newtonian order.JHEP, 02:188, 2024.arXiv:2308.01865,doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2024)188

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Gravito-magnetic polarization of Schwarzschild black hole.JHEP, 06:169, 2024.arXiv:2402.16172,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)169

    Tomer Hadad, Barak Kol, and Michael Smolkin. Gravito-magnetic polarization of Schwarzschild black hole.JHEP, 06:169, 2024.arXiv:2402.16172,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)169

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Dynamical Tidal Response of Non-rotating Black Holes: Connecting the MST For- malism and Worldline EFT

    Hajime Kobayashi, Shinji Mukohyama, Naritaka Oshita, Kazufumi Takahashi, and Vicharit Yingcharoenrat. Dynamical Tidal Response of Non-rotating Black Holes: Connecting the MST For- malism and Worldline EFT. 11 2025.arXiv:2511.12580

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Running Love numbers and the Effective Field Theory of gravity.JCAP, 07:071, 2025.arXiv:2501.18684,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2025/07/071

    Sergio Barbosa, Philippe Brax, Sylvain Fichet, and Lucas de Souza. Running Love numbers and the Effective Field Theory of gravity.JCAP, 07:071, 2025.arXiv:2501.18684,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2025/07/071

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Tidal Love numbers from EFT of black hole perturbations with timelike scalar profile.JCAP, 09:001, 2024.arXiv:2405.10813,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/09/ 001

    Chams Gharib Ali Barura, Hajime Kobayashi, Shinji Mukohyama, Naritaka Oshita, Kazufumi Taka- hashi, and Vicharit Yingcharoenrat. Tidal Love numbers from EFT of black hole perturbations with timelike scalar profile.JCAP, 09:001, 2024.arXiv:2405.10813,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/09/ 001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Parametrized tidal dissipation numbers of nonrotating black holes.Phys

    Hajime Kobayashi, Shinji Mukohyama, Naritaka Oshita, Kazufumi Takahashi, and Vicharit Yingcharoenrat. Parametrized tidal dissipation numbers of nonrotating black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 112(8):084061, 2025.arXiv:2505.19725,doi:10.1103/yclz-lbbs

    arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Tidal response of regular black holes.Phys

    Chiara Coviello, Vania Vellucci, and Luis Lehner. Tidal response of regular black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 111(10):104073, 2025.arXiv:2503.04287,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.104073

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Pablo A. Cano. Love numbers beyond GR from the modified Teukolsky equation.JHEP, 07:152, 2025. arXiv:2502.20185,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2025)152

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Tidal Love numbers for regular black holes

    Rui Wang, Qi-Long Shi, Wei Xiong, and Peng-Cheng Li. Tidal Love numbers for regular black holes. 12 2025.arXiv:2512.05767

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Quasinormal modes and tidal Love numbers of covariant effective quantum black holes with cosmological constant

    Yunlong Liu and Xiangdong Zhang. Quasinormal modes and tidal Love numbers of covariant effective quantum black holes with cosmological constant. 9 2025.arXiv:2509.12013

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Bender and Steven A

    Carl M. Bender and Steven A. Orszag.Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers I. Springer, 1999.doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3069-2

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3069-2 1999

  46. [46]

    Boyce and R.C

    W.E. Boyce and R.C. DiPrima.Elementary differential equations and boundary value problems. Wiley New York, 8th edition, 2004

    2004

  47. [47]

    Vitor Cardoso, Leonardo Gualtieri, and Christopher J. Moore. Gravitational waves and higher di- mensions: Love numbers and Kaluza-Klein excitations.Phys. Rev. D, 100(12):124037, 2019.arXiv: 1910.09557,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.124037

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Effective field theory of black hole perturbations 27 with timelike scalar profile: formulation.JCAP, 09:010, 2022.arXiv:2204.00228,doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2022/09/010

    Shinji Mukohyama and Vicharit Yingcharoenrat. Effective field theory of black hole perturbations 27 with timelike scalar profile: formulation.JCAP, 09:010, 2022.arXiv:2204.00228,doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2022/09/010

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Shinji Mukohyama, Kazufumi Takahashi, and Vicharit Yingcharoenrat. Generalized Regge-Wheeler equation from Effective Field Theory of black hole perturbations with a timelike scalar profile.JCAP, 10:050, 2022.arXiv:2208.02943,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/050

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Black hole perturbation in the most general scalar-tensor theory with second-order field equations I: the odd-parity sector.Phys

    Tsutomu Kobayashi, Hayato Motohashi, and Teruaki Suyama. Black hole perturbation in the most general scalar-tensor theory with second-order field equations I: the odd-parity sector.Phys. Rev. D, 85:084025, 2012. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 96, 109903 (2017)].arXiv:1202.4893,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.85.084025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  51. [51]

    Effective Field Theory of Black Hole Quasinormal Modes in Scalar-Tensor Theories.JHEP, 02:127, 2019.arXiv: 1810.07706,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)127

    Gabriele Franciolini, Lam Hui, Riccardo Penco, Luca Santoni, and Enrico Trincherini. Effective Field Theory of Black Hole Quasinormal Modes in Scalar-Tensor Theories.JHEP, 02:127, 2019.arXiv: 1810.07706,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)127

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    Effective field theory for gravitational radiation in scalar-tensor gravity.JCAP, 05:052, 2019.arXiv:1902.04941,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/ 052

    Adrien Kuntz, Federico Piazza, and Filippo Vernizzi. Effective field theory for gravitational radiation in scalar-tensor gravity.JCAP, 05:052, 2019.arXiv:1902.04941,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/ 052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Effective Field Theory for the perturbations of a slowly rotating black hole.JHEP, 12:183, 2021.arXiv:2111.02072,doi:10.1007/ JHEP12(2021)183

    Lam Hui, Alessandro Podo, Luca Santoni, and Enrico Trincherini. Effective Field Theory for the perturbations of a slowly rotating black hole.JHEP, 12:183, 2021.arXiv:2111.02072,doi:10.1007/ JHEP12(2021)183

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Quasinor- mal modes from EFT of black hole perturbations with timelike scalar profile.JCAP, 07:050, 2023

    Shinji Mukohyama, Kazufumi Takahashi, Keitaro Tomikawa, and Vicharit Yingcharoenrat. Quasinor- mal modes from EFT of black hole perturbations with timelike scalar profile.JCAP, 07:050, 2023. arXiv:2304.14304,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/07/050

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Regular Black Holes: A Short Topic Review

    Chen Lan, Hao Yang, Yang Guo, and Yan-Gang Miao. Regular Black Holes: A Short Topic Review. Int. J. Theor. Phys., 62(9):202, 2023.arXiv:2303.11696,doi:10.1007/s10773-023-05454-1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Regular black holes with asymptotically Minkowski cores.Universe, 6(1):8, 2019.arXiv:1911.01020,doi:10.3390/universe6010008

    Alex Simpson and Matt Visser. Regular black holes with asymptotically Minkowski cores.Universe, 6(1):8, 2019.arXiv:1911.01020,doi:10.3390/universe6010008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse

    James Bardeen. Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse. InProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity, page 87, September 1968

    1968

  58. [58]

    Sean A. Hayward. Formation and evaporation of regular black holes.Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:031103, 2006. arXiv:gr-qc/0506126,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.031103

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  59. [59]

    Geodesic incompleteness of some popular regular black holes.Phys

    Tian Zhou and Leonardo Modesto. Geodesic incompleteness of some popular regular black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 107(4):044016, 2023.arXiv:2208.02557,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.044016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Black Holes in an Effective Field Theory Extension of General Relativity.Phys

    Vitor Cardoso, Masashi Kimura, Andrea Maselli, and Leonardo Senatore. Black Holes in an Effective Field Theory Extension of General Relativity.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(25):251105, 2018. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 131, 109903 (2023)].arXiv:1808.08962,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.251105

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    Valerio De Luca, Justin Khoury, and Sam S. C. Wong. Implications of the weak gravity conjecture for tidal Love numbers of black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 108(4):044066, 2023.arXiv:2211.14325,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.044066. 28

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Parametrized Love numbers of nonrotating black holes.Phys

    Takuya Katagiri, Tact Ikeda, and Vitor Cardoso. Parametrized Love numbers of nonrotating black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 109(4):044067, 2024.arXiv:2310.19705,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.044067

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Gross and Edward Witten

    David J. Gross and Edward Witten. Superstring Modifications of Einstein’s Equations.Nucl. Phys. B, 277:1, 1986.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90429-3

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90429-3 1986

  64. [64]

    Kikuchi, C

    Y. Kikuchi, C. Marzban, and Y. J. Ng. Heterotic String Modifications of Einstein’s and Yang-Mills’ Actions.Phys. Lett. B, 176:57–60, 1986.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90924-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90924-x 1986

  65. [65]

    Gross and John H

    David J. Gross and John H. Sloan. The Quartic Effective Action for the Heterotic String.Nucl. Phys. B, 291:41–89, 1987.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90465-2

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90465-2 1987

  66. [66]

    Love numbers and magnetic susceptibility of charged black holes

    David Pereñiguez and Vitor Cardoso. Love numbers and magnetic susceptibility of charged black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 105(4):044026, 2022.arXiv:2112.08400,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.044026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Minghao Xia, Liang Ma, Yi Pang, and H. Lu. Full spectrum of Love numbers of Reissner-Nordstrom black hole in D-dimensions. 11 2025.arXiv:2511.09642

    arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Vanishing of nonlinear tidal Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes.Phys

    Massimiliano Maria Riva, Luca Santoni, Nikola Savić, and Filippo Vernizzi. Vanishing of nonlinear tidal Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes.Phys. Lett. B, 854:138710, 2024.arXiv:2312.05065, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138710

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Vanishing of quadratic Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes.JHEP, 02:174, 2025.arXiv:2410.03542, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)174

    Simon Iteanu, Massimiliano Maria Riva, Luca Santoni, Nikola Savić, and Filippo Vernizzi. Vanishing of quadratic Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes.JHEP, 02:174, 2025.arXiv:2410.03542, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)174

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Valerio De Luca, Justin Khoury, and Sam S. C. Wong. Nonlinearities in the tidal Love numbers of black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 108(2):024048, 2023.arXiv:2305.14444,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024048

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Black holes in a gravitational field: the non-linear static love number of Schwarzschild black holes vanishes.JCAP, 05:039, 2025.arXiv:2410.11014,doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2025/05/039

    Alex Kehagias and Antonio Riotto. Black holes in a gravitational field: the non-linear static love number of Schwarzschild black holes vanishes.JCAP, 05:039, 2025.arXiv:2410.11014,doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2025/05/039

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    L. R. Gounis, A. Kehagias, and A. Riotto. The vanishing of the non-linear static love number of Kerr black holes and the role of symmetries.JCAP, 03:002, 2025.arXiv:2412.08249,doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2025/03/002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Nonlinear Relativistic Tidal Response of Neutron Stars

    Paolo Pani, Massimiliano Maria Riva, Luca Santoni, Nikola Savić, and Filippo Vernizzi. Nonlinear Relativistic Tidal Response of Neutron Stars. 12 2025.arXiv:2512.14663

    arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Ladder Symmetry: The Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Vanishing Love Numbers

    Chanchal Sharma, Shuvayu Roy, and Sudipta Sarkar. Ladder Symmetry: The Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Vanishing Love Numbers. 11 2025.arXiv:2511.09670

    arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Exploring ladder symmetry and Love numbers for static and rotating black holes.Phys

    Chanchal Sharma, Rajes Ghosh, and Sudipta Sarkar. Exploring ladder symmetry and Love numbers for static and rotating black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 109(4):L041505, 2024.arXiv:2401.00703,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L041505

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024