Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Quantum fluctuations of the near-horizon Schwarzian mode increase the shear viscosity of near-extremal charged anti-de Sitter black holes away from s/(4π) while preserving the viscosity/entropy bound, and lift the classical zero-temperature

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 14:36 UTC pith:D7JWPH65

load-bearing objection New Δ=0 identification and a clean Schwarzian averaging calculation, but the final step inserts ⟨G0⟩ into the classical matching formula by hand; the pole position and η depend on that unproven factorization. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2512.19642 v2 pith:D7JWPH65 submitted 2025-12-22 hep-th

Schwarzian quantum corrections to shear correlators of the near-extremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om-AdS black hole

classification hep-th
keywords Schwarzian effective theorynear-extremal black holesshear viscosityholographic hydrodynamicsAdS2/CFT1quantum fluctuationsviscosity/entropy boundgapless modes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks whether the classic holographic result that shear viscosity equals s/(4π) survives once quantum fluctuations of a black hole's near-horizon degrees of freedom are included. For near-extremal charged black holes, it argues that quantum corrections push the viscosity upward, away from s/(4π), with a correction that grows as temperature drops, so the conjectured lower bound remains intact rather than violated. Outside the hydrodynamic regime, the same corrections eliminate the classical zero-temperature gapless mode, addressing a longstanding puzzle. The argument turns on identifying the relevant infrared operator as dimension Δ=0 and taking a careful logarithmic limit of exact Schwarzian quantum correlators.

Core claim

The paper establishes that, for a near-extremal charged AdS4 black hole with a compact flat horizon, the shear retarded Green's function keeps its hydrodynamic form after including bulk quantum fluctuations: G_R = ⟨η⟩ ω² / (iω − ⟨D⊥⟩ k²), where ⟨η⟩ and ⟨D⊥⟩ both acquire the same multiplicative factor 1 + 3/(64π⁴) · 1/(CT)² + O(1/(CT)³). Here C is the coefficient of the Schwarzian effective action (essentially the near-extremal heat capacity) and T is temperature. The calculation hinges on showing that the outer region imposes Neumann boundary conditions on the inner AdS2 dynamics, selecting a Δ=0 operator whose quantum-averaged retarded correlator is obtained through a controlled Δ→0 limit o

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a matching calculation that splits the bulk into an inner near-horizon AdS2×T² region and an outer asymptotically AdS4 region. The inner dynamics is a massless scalar in AdS2; the outer region selects the alternative Δ=0 quantization (Neumann boundary conditions), so the classical inner retarded Green's function is G_R0(ω)=1/(iω). Quantum corrections are included by replacing this classical correlator with its expectation value in the exactly-solvable Schwarzian path integral, evaluated in a saddle-point expansion of the integral (5.5) as Δ→0. The result is a pure overall multiplicative factor e^λ = 1 + (3/64π⁴) β²/C² + O(β³/C³). Substituting this averaged inner corr

Load-bearing premise

The matched inner/outer calculation is carried over without modification once the classical inner correlator is replaced by its Schwarzian-averaged value; if quantum fluctuations also correct the outer region or mix with the matching coefficients, the extracted viscosity and diffusivity would change.

What would settle it

Compute the next order in the near-extremal expansion of the shear master-field equation (the O(ε) matching) and check whether the Schwarzian correction still factors out of the full Green's function. If a term of order 1/(CT) appears, or if the factor multiplies numerator and denominator differently, the specific prediction (1.9) fails. A simpler check: measure the temperature dependence of the shear pole at fixed small k; the deviation from D⊥ = r_e/12 must scale as T^{-2} with coefficient 3/(64π⁴) in units of r_e/C².

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The quantum-corrected shear correlator still exhibits a single hydrodynamic pole, so the Kubo formula and the pole location give the same corrected shear viscosity, preserving the hydrodynamic relation D⊥ = η/χ.
  • The shear viscosity and diffusivity both grow by the same factor as temperature decreases, keeping the ratio η/χ fixed and leaving the conjectured viscosity/entropy bound η/s ≥ 1/4π intact at this order.
  • In the non-hydrodynamic regime, the coefficient of the k² mode diverges as 1/(CT)² as T→0, so the classical zero-temperature gapless mode is lifted; its precise fate lies beyond the present calculation.
  • The quantum correction to η is consistent with earlier findings that the quantum absorption cross-section of near-extremal black holes increases relative to the classical horizon-area value.
  • The correction requires a compact transverse space; for non-compact horizons the Schwarzian contribution vanishes and the effect disappears.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If quantum fluctuations also correct the outer-region matching coefficients, the simple multiplicative factorization could break down, and η and D⊥ would receive different corrections; a next-order computation would directly test this.
  • The same Δ=0 selection and averaging procedure should apply to the charge-diffusion sector, where the inner solution is also k-independent at leading order, giving a concrete prediction for the quantum-corrected charge diffusivity.
  • The divergence of the correction as T→0 suggests that the zero-temperature limit of the near-extremal fluid is not a smooth classical state; a quantum critical crossover may take over before the classical gapless mode is reached.
  • The strong dependence on the boundary-condition choice (Δ=0 versus Δ=1) implies that an independent bulk one-loop computation of the shear correlator would sharply discriminate between the two quantizations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper computes the leading Schwarzian (near-AdS2) quantum corrections to the transverse shear response of the boundary state dual to a near-extremal Reissner-Nordström-AdS4 planar black hole. The authors identify the IR operator controlling the shear diffusion mode as a massless scalar in AdS2 with Neumann (Δ=0) boundary conditions, whose classical retarded two-point function is G_R0(ω)=1/(iω). Using the exact Schwarzian bilocal correlators of Mertens–Turiaci–Verlinde, they implement a Δ→0 limit to obtain the Schwarzian-averaged correlator ⟨G_R0(ω)⟩ = [1+3/(64π^4) 1/(CT)^2 + ...] G_R0(ω). Substituting this average into the previous classical matching formula for the shear Green's function gives a hydrodynamic pole with ⟨η⟩ = s0/(4π)(1+3/(64π^4)/(CT)^2+...) and ⟨D⊥⟩ = re/12 times the same factor. They conclude that quantum fluctuations increase η/s above the KSS value and lift the classical T=0 gapless shear mode in the non-hydrodynamic regime.

Significance. If the central factorization assumption were justified, this would be a significant, parameter-free prediction: a concrete O(1/(CT)^2) correction to η/s from a quantized near-AdS2 Schwarzian mode, in a regime where classical Einstein gravity otherwise gives η/s=1/(4π). The paper's derivation of the Δ=0 boundary conditions and the Δ→0 limit of the Schwarzian bilocal is detailed and technically careful, and the result agrees qualitatively with the expectation from quantum absorption cross-sections. However, the quantum average is inserted into a nonlinear matching formula by fiat, and the reported coefficient depends on this unproven step. The disagreement with other recent works at O(1/(CT)) also remains unexplained. The result is therefore not yet established at the level required for publication; the core calculation may be salvageable.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 6, Eqs. (6.4)–(6.5)] The central step is replacing G_R0 by ⟨G_R0⟩ inside the closed matching formula. Eq. (6.4) is nonlinear in G_R0; expanding in k², G_R0/(1-(re/12)k²G_R0) = G_R0 + (re/12)k²G_R0² + ... . The O(k²) correction to the Green's function therefore involves ⟨G_R0²⟩, not ⟨G_R0⟩². Section 5.4 proves only the multiplicative renormalization of the two-point function, Eq. (5.47). Unless one shows that the Schwarzian average factorizes for all powers, or that connected contributions to ⟨G_R0²⟩ are suppressed beyond O(β²/C²), the pole position (6.6) and the values (6.7)–(6.8) are not derived. The outer AdS4 region is treated as a classical spectator, and no single path integral over the Schwarzian mode of the full matched system is given. This is load-bearing: an unpfactorized connected piece would add O(k² β²/C²) terms to the dispersion relation, changing ⟨η⟩ and ⟨D⊥⟩.
  2. [Section 5.2, Eqs. (5.10)–(5.18)] The Δ→0 prescription defines the Schwarzian average of the logarithmic correlator as the linear-in-Δ coefficient of ⟨GE_Δ⟩ = 1 + Δ⟨log GE_1⟩ + ... and then multiplies by 1/(2π) in Eq. (5.18). This is not a direct computation of ⟨log|τE|⟩ from the path integral; it assumes that the Δ→0 limit commutes with the Schwarzian average and that no extra Δ-dependent normalization of the source or contact terms contributes. Since the final O(1/(CT)^2) coefficient and the comparison with [76–78] both hinge on this step, the procedure should be justified from the path integral or by an independent check such as the n=0 Matsubara mode in Appendix C.
  3. [Eq. (5.35)] As written, Eq. (5.35) contains the explicit prefactor β/(2π² C). This is inconsistent with the semi-classical limit: it would make I2 vanish as C→∞, contradicting Eq. (5.25) and the recovery of the classical result (5.27). The subsequent derivation of ⟨G_R0(τ)⟩ = e^λ Θ(τ) also appears to drop this prefactor. Since λ and the reported coefficient 3/(64π^4) are defined through this expression, the prefactor must be corrected and the calculation re-checked. If the prefactor is a typographical error, the authors should state the correct expression.
  4. [Note added (end of Section 1)] The paper's result differs from [76–78] by an O(1/(CT)) correction, an order of magnitude larger than the claimed O(1/(CT)^2) effect. The note lists three possible sources of the difference (Δ=0, subleading saddle point, truncation of thermodynamics) but does not identify which one removes the linear correction, nor does it provide an independent cross-check. Given the factorization issue in Eqs. (6.4)–(6.5), the discrepancy cannot currently be attributed with confidence to the Δ=0 identification. The authors should at least compute a diagnostic quantity, for example the same correction with Δ=1 boundary conditions, to isolate the source.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 5.1, Eq. (5.2)] The Euclidean Schwarzian action should be S0 - C∫{tan(πu/β),τ} with a minus sign to reproduce the standard partition function (5.3); please check the sign convention.
  2. [General] There are frequent OCR-type typos: 'Ads2' for AdS2, 'Reisner-Nordström' for Reissner-Nordström, and several garbled characters such as '⣨ GE ⟩'. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  3. [Section 5.2, Eq. (5.18)] The 1/(2π) prefactor in the definition of ⟨GE_0⟩ is introduced without comment; specify the normalization of the bilocal operator and the Euclidean correlator so this factor is unambiguous.
  4. [References] Ref. [69] is cited as 'To appear' and is used to justify claims about the next order in matching. Please provide the status of this reference or remove the dependence on it.
  5. [Figures 3 and 4] The analytic-continuation argument crossing the branch cuts is dense. The sign conventions in the figures and the text should be made more explicit, especially the relation between the two jumps and the factor of e^λ.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the O(1/(CT)^2) correction is computed from independent Schwarzian bilocal results and an external matching framework; self-citations are contextual only.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained modulo independent external inputs. Section 3 uses the matching framework of Davison-Parnachev [38] to obtain the classical shear correlator (3.40)/(6.4) with inner Green's function G0(ω)=1/(iω). Section 4 derives, rather than assumes, the ∆=0 Neumann boundary conditions from the outer-region variational principle, giving (4.1). Section 5 starts from the exact Schwarzian bilocal result (5.5) of Mertens-Turiaci-Verlinde [64] and takes a new ∆→0 limit to compute the averaged inner correlator, obtaining the parameter-free multiplicative factor 1+3/(64π^4)(β/C)^2+O(β^3/C^3). No parameter is fitted to the final shear viscosity; the numerical coefficient follows from the saddle-point expansion. Self-citations [34,35,69] are used for context—gapless modes, keq, and future next-order matching—and are not load-bearing for the claimed quantum correction. The potential concern raised by the skeptic is that substituting the averaged G0 into the nonlinear denominator of (6.4) assumes factorization such as <G0^2>=<G0>^2 at the order needed for the k^2 pole, and the paper does not derive this from a single path integral over the full matched system. That is a real validity/approximation issue, but it is not circular: the averaged inner correlator is computed independently and is not defined in terms of the final viscosity correction. The disagreement with [76-78] noted in the paper is a physical discrepancy, not evidence of circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation uses existing near-AdS2/Schwarzian machinery and holographic matching. No new particles, forces, or symmetries are introduced. There are no fitted free parameters: C, re, and s0 are fixed by the RN-AdS4 background, and the O(1/(CT)^2) coefficient is generated by the saddle-point evaluation of exact Schwarzian integrals. The main structural assumptions are the reduction to the pure Schwarzian sector and the factorization of quantum averaging from the classical matching procedure.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The near-extremal near-horizon RN-AdS4×T2 dynamics is described by the 0+1-dimensional Schwarzian action (1.4) after Kaluza-Klein reduction.
    Invoked in §1 and the opening of §5 to import exact Schwarzian correlators into the 4D black hole problem; standard near-AdS2 paradigm [48,55].
  • domain assumption Kaluza-Klein reduction to the Schwarzian sector is valid: massive torus modes decouple because the O(ε^0) inner Green's function is k-independent; massless modes decouple only for re L ≲ 1.
    Stated in §5 first paragraph; if not satisfied, the pure Schwarzian correlator (5.5) does not apply to the 4D shear sector.
  • ad hoc to paper The outer AdS4 region is treated classically and its matching coefficients (e.g. cI1 = iω re c0) are unaffected by Schwarzian quantum fluctuations.
    Used in §6 (6.4)–(6.5) to insert the quantum-averaged inner Green's function into the classical matching formula; not derived from a single path integral.
  • domain assumption The exact Schwarzian bilocal two-point functions (5.5) from ref. [64] are correct and can be analytically continued via the Wick-rotation prescription of §5.1.
    Central input for ⟨G_R0⟩; taken from prior literature [64–66] and not rederived in this paper.
  • standard math The saddle-point approximation in the large-C limit is controlled, and subleading corrections are captured by expanding λ(x) to O(x^3).
    Used in §5.4 to obtain e^λ; relies on M0≫ω and on neglecting exponentially suppressed terms.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 30430 in / 12521 out tokens · 122898 ms · 2026-08-03T14:36:35.915003+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Near-AdS$_2$ spacetimes are controlled by a Schwarzian effective dual theory. The Kaluza-Klein reduction of higher-dimensional black holes shows that the Schwarzian generates a logarithmic contribution to the entropy, thereby resolving a long-standing puzzle in near-extremal black hole thermodynamics. Here, we leverage exact results for quantum-corrected, Schwarzian scalar correlation functions in order to evaluate the impact of bulk quantum fluctuations on the low-temperature shear correlators of the state dual to Reissner-Nordstr\"om-AdS$_4$ black holes with a flat, compact horizon. In the hydrodynamic regime, we find that quantum fluctuations tend to increase the shear viscosity away from $s/(4\pi)$, thereby preserving the Kovtun-Son-Starinets bound. Outside the hydrodynamic regime, quantum fluctuations lift the zero temperature, classical gapless modes reported in previous literature.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exact Schwarzian Metric Factor and Holographic Wilson-Loop Screening

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Exact Schwarzian averaging yields a completely monotone metric factor with no confining minimum, so the Wilson-loop potential screens as E(L) ~ -κ_IR/L² rather than confining.

  2. Not all black holes decohere quantum superpositions

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Near-extremal charged black holes make decoherence of charged particle superpositions vanish at late times via a spin-induced energy gap from quantum metric fluctuations.

  3. Flavour current correlators and the non-Abelian hydrodynamic approximation: the charged sector

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Isospin-imbalanced strongly coupled dense matter is shown, via holography, to obey non-Abelian hydrodynamic predictions for current correlators up to the chemical-potential scale, beyond the standard ω,k ≪ T regime.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 84 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Forster,Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions, CRC Press (2018)

    D. Forster,Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions, CRC Press (2018)

  2. [2]

    Chaikin and T.C

    P.M. Chaikin and T.C. Lubensky,Principles of Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press (1995), 10.1017/CBO9780511813467

  3. [3]

    Kovtun,Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,J

    P. Kovtun,Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,J. Phys. A 45(2012) 473001 [1205.5040]

  4. [4]

    Liu and P

    H. Liu and P. Glorioso,Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics,PoST ASI2017(2018) 008 [1805.09331]

  5. [5]

    Berges, M.P

    J. Berges, M.P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas and R. Venugopalan,QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 035003 [2005.12299]

  6. [6]

    Policastro, D.T

    G. Policastro, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,The Shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 081601 [hep-th/0104066]

  7. [7]

    Kovtun, D.T

    P. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,Holography and hydrodynamics: Diffusion on stretched horizons,JHEP10(2003) 064 [hep-th/0309213]

  8. [8]

    Cremonini,The Shear Viscosity to Entropy Ratio: A Status Report,Mod

    S. Cremonini,The Shear Viscosity to Entropy Ratio: A Status Report,Mod. Phys. Lett. B25(2011) 1867 [1108.0677]

  9. [9]

    Kovtun, D.T

    P. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 111601 [hep-th/0405231]

  10. [10]

    Son and A.O

    D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,Viscosity, Black Holes, and Quantum Field Theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57(2007) 95 [0704.0240]

  11. [11]

    Hartnoll,Theory of universal incoherent metallic transport,Nature Phys.11 (2015) 54 [1405.3651]

    S.A. Hartnoll,Theory of universal incoherent metallic transport,Nature Phys.11 (2015) 54 [1405.3651]

  12. [12]

    Grozdanov,Bounds on transport from univalence and pole-skipping,Phys

    S. Grozdanov,Bounds on transport from univalence and pole-skipping,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 051601 [2008.00888]

  13. [13]

    Heller, A

    M.P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spaliński and B. Withers,Rigorous Bounds on Transport from Causality,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 261601 [2212.07434]

  14. [14]

    Heller, A

    M.P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spaliński and B. Withers,The space of transport coefficients allowed by causality,Nature Phys.20(2024) 1948 [2305.07703]. – 41 –

  15. [15]

    Chowdhury, S.A

    S.D. Chowdhury, S.A. Hartnoll, A. Hebbar and R. Khondaker,Bootstrapping transport in the Drude-Kadanoff-Martin model,2509.18255

  16. [16]

    Chowdhury, S.A

    S.D. Chowdhury, S.A. Hartnoll and A. Hebbar,Lieb-Robinson causality and non-Fermi liquids,2510.18950

  17. [17]

    Chowdhury,Planckian Bounds via Spectral Moments of Optical Conductivity, 2512.09979

    D. Chowdhury,Planckian Bounds via Spectral Moments of Optical Conductivity, 2512.09979

  18. [18]

    Rebhan and D

    A. Rebhan and D. Steineder,Violation of the Holographic Viscosity Bound in a Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Plasma,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 021601 [1110.6825]

  19. [19]

    Davison and B

    R.A. Davison and B. Goutéraux,Momentum dissipation and effective theories of coherent and incoherent transport,JHEP01(2015) 039 [1411.1062]

  20. [20]

    S. Jain, N. Kundu, K. Sen, A. Sinha and S.P. Trivedi,A Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Fluid From Dilaton Driven Holography,JHEP01(2015) 005 [1406.4874]

  21. [21]

    Hartnoll, D.M

    S.A. Hartnoll, D.M. Ramirez and J.E. Santos,Entropy production, viscosity bounds and bumpy black holes,JHEP03(2016) 170 [1601.02757]

  22. [22]

    Alberte, M

    L. Alberte, M. Baggioli and O. Pujolas,Viscosity bound violation in holographic solids and the viscoelastic response,JHEP07(2016) 074 [1601.03384]

  23. [23]

    Policastro, D.T

    G. Policastro, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,From AdS / CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics,JHEP09(2002) 043 [hep-th/0205052]

  24. [24]

    Policastro, D.T

    G. Policastro, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,From AdS / CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics. 2. Sound waves,JHEP12(2002) 054 [hep-th/0210220]

  25. [25]

    Herzog,The Hydrodynamics of M theory,JHEP12(2002) 026 [hep-th/0210126]

    C.P. Herzog,The Hydrodynamics of M theory,JHEP12(2002) 026 [hep-th/0210126]

  26. [26]

    Kovtun and A.O

    P.K. Kovtun and A.O. Starinets,Quasinormal modes and holography,Phys. Rev. D 72(2005) 086009 [hep-th/0506184]

  27. [27]

    Bhattacharyya, V.E

    S. Bhattacharyya, V.E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla and M. Rangamani,Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity,JHEP02(2008) 045 [0712.2456]

  28. [28]

    Banerjee, J

    N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Dutta, R. Loganayagam and P. Surowka,Hydrodynamics from charged black branes,JHEP01(2011) 094 [0809.2596]

  29. [29]

    Erdmenger, M

    J. Erdmenger, M. Haack, M. Kaminski and A. Yarom,Fluid dynamics of R-charged black holes,JHEP01(2009) 055 [0809.2488]

  30. [30]

    Withers,Short-lived modes from hydrodynamic dispersion relations,JHEP06 (2018) 059 [1803.08058]

    B. Withers,Short-lived modes from hydrodynamic dispersion relations,JHEP06 (2018) 059 [1803.08058]

  31. [31]

    Grozdanov, P.K

    S. Grozdanov, P.K. Kovtun, A.O. Starinets and P. Tadić,Convergence of the Gradient Expansion in Hydrodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 251601 [1904.01018]. – 42 –

  32. [32]

    Grozdanov, P.K

    S. Grozdanov, P.K. Kovtun, A.O. Starinets and P. Tadić,The complex life of hydrodynamic modes,JHEP11(2019) 097 [1904.12862]

  33. [33]

    Jansen and C

    A. Jansen and C. Pantelidou,Quasinormal modes in charged fluids at complex momentum,JHEP10(2020) 121 [2007.14418]

  34. [34]

    Arean, R.A

    D. Arean, R.A. Davison, B. Goutéraux and K. Suzuki,Hydrodynamic Diffusion and Its Breakdown near AdS2 Quantum Critical Points,Phys. Rev. X11(2021) 031024 [2011.12301]

  35. [35]

    Goutéraux, D.M

    B. Goutéraux, D.M. Ramirez, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia and C. Supiot, Near-extremal holographic charge correlators,2506.11974

  36. [36]

    Edalati, J.I

    M. Edalati, J.I. Jottar and R.G. Leigh,Transport Coefficients at Zero Temperature from Extremal Black Holes,JHEP01(2010) 018 [0910.0645]

  37. [37]

    Edalati, J.I

    M. Edalati, J.I. Jottar and R.G. Leigh,Shear Modes, Criticality and Extremal Black Holes,JHEP04(2010) 075 [1001.0779]

  38. [38]

    Davison and A

    R.A. Davison and A. Parnachev,Hydrodynamics of cold holographic matter,JHEP 06(2013) 100 [1303.6334]

  39. [39]

    Edalati, J.I

    M. Edalati, J.I. Jottar and R.G. Leigh,Holography and the sound of criticality, JHEP10(2010) 058 [1005.4075]

  40. [40]

    Gushterov, A

    N.I. Gushterov, A. O’Bannon and R. Rodgers,Holographic Zero Sound from Spacetime-Filling Branes,JHEP10(2018) 076 [1807.11327]

  41. [41]

    D.V. Else, R. Thorngren and T. Senthil,Non-fermi liquids as ersatz fermi liquids: General constraints on compressible metals,Physical Review X11(2021)

  42. [42]

    Delacrétaz, D.M

    L.V. Delacrétaz, D.M. Hofman and G. Mathys,Superfluids as Higher-form Anomalies,SciPost Phys.8(2020) 047 [1908.06977]

  43. [43]

    Chen and A

    C.-F. Chen and A. Lucas,Origin of the Drude peak and of zero sound in probe brane holography,Phys. Lett. B774(2017) 569 [1709.01520]

  44. [44]

    Grozdanov, A

    S. Grozdanov, A. Lucas and N. Poovuttikul,Holography and hydrodynamics with weakly broken symmetries,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 086012 [1810.10016]

  45. [45]

    Davison, B

    R.A. Davison, B. Goutéraux and E. Mefford,Zero sound and higher-form symmetries in compressible holographic phases,JHEP12(2023) 040 [2210.14802]

  46. [46]

    Faulkner, H

    T. Faulkner, H. Liu, J. McGreevy and D. Vegh,Emergent quantum criticality, Fermi surfaces, and AdS(2),Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 125002 [0907.2694]

  47. [47]

    Hartnoll and D.M

    S.A. Hartnoll and D.M. Hofman,Locally Critical Resistivities from Umklapp Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 241601 [1201.3917]

  48. [48]

    Iliesiu and G.J

    L.V. Iliesiu and G.J. Turiaci,The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes, JHEP05(2021) 145 [2003.02860]

  49. [49]

    Kitaev,A simple model of quantum holography (part 1), talk at KITP, April, 2015

    A. Kitaev,A simple model of quantum holography (part 1), talk at KITP, April, 2015

  50. [50]

    Kitaev,A simple model of quantum holography (part 2), talk at KITP, May, 2015

    A. Kitaev,A simple model of quantum holography (part 2), talk at KITP, May, 2015. – 43 –

  51. [51]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford,Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 106002 [1604.07818]

  52. [52]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,PTEP2016(2016) 12C104 [1606.01857]

  53. [53]

    Jensen,Chaos in AdS2 Holography,Phys

    K. Jensen,Chaos in AdS2 Holography,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 111601 [1605.06098]

  54. [54]

    Engelsöy, T.G

    J. Engelsöy, T.G. Mertens and H. Verlinde,An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holography,JHEP07(2016) 139 [1606.03438]

  55. [55]

    Stanford and E

    D. Stanford and E. Witten,Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory,JHEP 10(2017) 008 [1703.04612]

  56. [56]

    Davison, W

    R.A. Davison, W. Fu, A. Georges, Y. Gu, K. Jensen and S. Sachdev,Thermoelectric transport in disordered metals without quasiparticles: The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and holography,Phys. Rev. B95(2017) 155131 [1612.00849]

  57. [57]

    Nayak, A

    P. Nayak, A. Shukla, R.M. Soni, S.P. Trivedi and V. Vishal,On the Dynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes,JHEP09(2018) 048 [1802.09547]

  58. [58]

    Moitra, S.P

    U. Moitra, S.P. Trivedi and V. Vishal,Extremal and near-extremal black holes and near-CFT1,JHEP07(2019) 055 [1808.08239]

  59. [59]

    Sachdev,Universal low temperature theory of charged black holes with AdS2 horizons,J

    S. Sachdev,Universal low temperature theory of charged black holes with AdS2 horizons,J. Math. Phys.60(2019) 052303 [1902.04078]

  60. [60]

    Moitra, S.K

    U. Moitra, S.K. Sake, S.P. Trivedi and V. Vishal,Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity and Rotating Black Holes,JHEP11(2019) 047 [1905.10378]

  61. [61]

    Heydeman, L.V

    M. Heydeman, L.V. Iliesiu, G.J. Turiaci and W. Zhao,The statistical mechanics of near-BPS black holes,J. Phys. A55(2022) 014004 [2011.01953]

  62. [62]

    Iliesiu, S

    L.V. Iliesiu, S. Murthy and G.J. Turiaci,Revisiting the logarithmic corrections to the black hole entropy,JHEP07(2025) 058 [2209.13608]

  63. [63]

    Banerjee and M

    N. Banerjee and M. Saha,Revisiting leading quantum corrections to near extremal black hole thermodynamics,JHEP07(2023) 010 [2303.12415]

  64. [64]

    Mertens, G.J

    T.G. Mertens, G.J. Turiaci and H.L. Verlinde,Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,JHEP08(2017) 136 [1705.08408]

  65. [65]

    Lam, T.G

    H.T. Lam, T.G. Mertens, G.J. Turiaci and H. Verlinde,Shockwave S-matrix from Schwarzian Quantum Mechanics,JHEP11(2018) 182 [1804.09834]

  66. [66]

    Mertens and G.J

    T.G. Mertens and G.J. Turiaci,Defects in Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity, JHEP08(2019) 127 [1904.05228]

  67. [67]

    X.-L. Liu, J. Nian and L.A. Pando Zayas,Quantum Corrections to Holographic Strange Metal at Low Temperature,2410.11487

  68. [68]

    Klebanov and E

    I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten,AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B556(1999) 89 [hep-th/9905104]. – 44 –

  69. [69]

    Goutéraux, D.M

    B. Goutéraux, D.M. Ramirez, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia and C. Supiot,To appear,

  70. [70]

    Klebanov,World volume approach to absorption by nondilatonic branes,Nucl

    I.R. Klebanov,World volume approach to absorption by nondilatonic branes,Nucl. Phys. B496(1997) 231 [hep-th/9702076]

  71. [71]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.A. Tseytlin,String theory and classical absorption by three-branes,Nucl. Phys. B499(1997) 217 [hep-th/9703040]

  72. [72]

    Emparan,Quantum cross-section of near-extremal black holes,JHEP04(2025) 122 [2501.17470]

    R. Emparan,Quantum cross-section of near-extremal black holes,JHEP04(2025) 122 [2501.17470]

  73. [73]

    Biggs,Following the state of an evaporating charged black hole into the quantum gravity regime,2503.02051

    A. Biggs,Following the state of an evaporating charged black hole into the quantum gravity regime,2503.02051

  74. [74]

    Emparan and S

    R. Emparan and S. Trezzi,Quantum transparency of near-extremal black holes, JHEP10(2025) 023 [2507.03398]

  75. [75]

    Betzios, O

    P. Betzios, O. Papadoulaki and Y. Zhou,Near-extremal quantum cross-section for charged fields and superradiance,2507.13896

  76. [76]

    Pando Zayas and J

    L.A. Pando Zayas and J. Zhang,One-loop Corrected Holographic Shear Viscosity to Entropy Density Ratio at Low Temperatures,2510.16100

  77. [77]

    Nian, L.A

    J. Nian, L.A. Pando Zayas and C.-Y. Yue,Quantum Corrections in the Low-Temperature Fluid/Gravity Correspondence,2510.15411

  78. [78]

    Cremonini, L

    S. Cremonini, L. Li, X.-L. Liu and J. Nian,Quantum Corrections toη/sfrom JT Gravity,2510.21602

  79. [79]

    McGreevy,Holographic duality with a view toward many-body physics,Adv

    J. McGreevy,Holographic duality with a view toward many-body physics,Adv. High Energy Phys.2010(2010) 723105 [0909.0518]

  80. [80]

    Nickel and D.T

    D. Nickel and D.T. Son,Deconstructing holographic liquids,New J. Phys.13(2011) 075010 [1009.3094]

Showing first 80 references.