Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Orbital magnetization reveals multiband topology

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that splitting the orbital magnetic susceptibility into an energetic part, fixed by the measured band structure, and a quantum-geometric part that carries the multiband Euler invariant turns magnetization into a practical p

desk verdict Solid derivation with an overstated headline: the geometric susceptibility fingerprints an idealized Euler-node metric, not a parameter-free deduction of the Euler invariant. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.19690 v3 pith:FCARWONV submitted 2025-12-22 cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

Chun Wang Chau , Robert-Jan Slager , Wojciech J. Jankowski This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords orbitalmagnetizationmagneticsusceptibilitymultibandtopologyEulerclassquantummetricgeometrySr2RuO4ARPES
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a bulk magnetic response—the orbital magnetic susceptibility—can reveal topological invariants that live on pairs of bands rather than single bands. The authors split the susceptibility into an energetic contribution computable directly from ARPES band-structure data and a quantum-geometric contribution built from the multiband quantum metric. They show that near an Euler node the geometric contribution dominates and opposes the energetic one, producing a characteristic sign-reversal fingerprint tied to the Euler invariant. They demonstrate this in general continuum and lattice models and in a seven-band model of strontium ruthenate, where doping-dependent magnetization measurements could in principle verify the multiband topology. If correct, this gives experimental access to multiband Euler topology that has so far lacked a general probe independent of band energies.

What carries the argument

The central object is the multiband quantum metric tensor gabμν = Re⟨ua|∂μub⟩⟨ub|∂νua⟩, which enters the geometric susceptibility terms and carries the topological information. The Euler invariant e2 = (1/2π)[∫D Euab − ∮∂D A·dk] captures the obstruction to Stokes' theorem for the multiband connection and is protected by PT symmetry. The derivation uses the full current-operator response formula, recast through band projectors and their derivatives, to isolate energetic and geometric pieces; the geometric pieces are then evaluated near an Euler node using the ideal metric ansatz g ∝ |e2|2/k2. This ansatz is what converts a measured χgeo into a statement about the Euler integer.

What would settle it

Measure the doping-dependent orbital susceptibility of Sr2RuO4 near the predicted chemical potentials (around μ = -0.8 and 0.2 eV), subtract the ARPES-derived energetic contribution, and compare the residual geometric susceptibility with the e2 = 1 prediction from the ideal metric ansatz; if the predicted sign reversal or magnitude is absent, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the orbital magnetic susceptibility χO = χE + χgeo decomposes into an energetic term χE, fixed by band dispersions and occupations, and geometric terms χxx, χyy, χxy that are explicit functions of the multiband quantum metric gabμν. For Euler bands with a quadratic band touching, the quantum metric takes an ideal form proportional to |e2|2/k2, and the geometric susceptibility then evaluates to a value that is always opposite in sign to the energetic contribution, so the total susceptibility can reverse sign depending on the relative masses. The authors further show that in a seven-band tight-binding model of Sr2RuO4, two Euler nodes with |e2| = 1 produce concentrate

Load-bearing premise

The reconstruction assumes that near each Euler node the quantum metric is well approximated by the ideal inverse-distance-squared form with only the lowest angular harmonic, so real band structures with higher angular harmonics would shift the geometric susceptibility and break the quantitative link between the measured χgeo and the Euler integer e2.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, orbital magnetization becomes a bulk probe of Euler topology, analogous to how the anomalous Hall conductance probes Chern bands.
  • Given an ARPES-measured band structure and a total susceptibility measurement, one can subtract the energetic part and test the residual geometric part against the predicted e2 fingerprint.
  • In Sr2RuO4, doping-dependent magnetization should show geometric features near the predicted chemical potentials, separated from van Hove effects by inspecting the ARPES spectrum.
  • The decomposition goes beyond two-band approximations and includes three- and four-band geometric terms, so it applies to realistic multiband materials rather than idealized two-band models.
  • The sign reversal between geometric and energetic contributions near an Euler node provides a distinctive experimental signature that does not require resolving the quantum metric directly in momentum space.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper validates the link using an analytical ansatz rather than a parameter-free fit; a stronger test would compute χgeo directly from the full fitted tight-binding model over the entire Brillouin zone, not just the local node neighborhood.
  • Because the patch Euler class does not constrain higher angular harmonics of the connection or dispersion, the protocol is most reliable for nearly rotation-symmetric nodes; materials with strong lattice anisotropy may need harmonic corrections beyond the ideal metric.
  • The same energetic/geometric decomposition could be applied to other magnetic or nonlinear responses to look for fingerprints of other multiband invariants, such as Pontryagin indices in three-dimensional systems.
  • If confirmed in Sr2RuO4, this would offer a route to detecting multiband topology without momentum-resolved quantum metric measurements, which are currently limited to two-band approximations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that the orbital magnetic susceptibility of Bloch electrons can be decomposed into an energetic contribution (Landau-Peierls) and a quantum-geometric contribution, and that the geometric part carries a characteristic fingerprint of multiband Euler topology. For an ideal Euler node, the authors show analytically that the geometric and energetic contributions have opposite signs, leading to a possible sign reversal of the total susceptibility. They apply this idea to a seven-band tight-binding model of Sr2RuO4, within which they identify Euler invariants, and propose a reconstruction protocol: extract χE from ARPES, measure χO, subtract the spin contribution, and compare the residual χgeo with an analytical ansatz for the quantum metric. The paper includes a long supplemental derivation of the susceptibility decomposition and of the two-band and multi-band geometric terms.

Significance. The analytical derivation of the Fukuyama-formula decomposition in the SM is long and careful, and the two-band result that the geometric susceptibility opposes the energetic one for ideal Euler nodes is a useful contribution. The idea of using orbital magnetization as a probe of multiband topology is timely and could be significant if the link between χgeo and the Euler invariant were robust. The paper also makes a concrete prediction for a material model (Sr2RuO4) with experimentally accessible magnetization measurements. However, the central 'deduction' claim is currently stronger than what the reconstruction protocol actually delivers, and a major gap exists between the main-text equations and the full multi-band decomposition presented in the SM.

major comments (2)
  1. [SM §III.C, 'Higher angular harmonic contributions'; Discussion] The paper's own supplemental material admits that the patch Euler class does not constrain the higher angular harmonics of the connection (e.g., ξ̃ ∝ sin3θ) or of the dispersion (ε ∼ k²(1−α cos4θ)). These higher harmonics enter the integrals in Eqs. (3)–(5) through the metric and velocity weights, so χgeo can change substantially, possibly even in sign, while e2 remains fixed. The proposed validation in the Discussion—'inserting an analytical ansatz for gab ∝ |e2|²/|k|²'—therefore tests only the ideal rotationally symmetric model; it is a consistency check, not a deduction of e2 from χgeo. The abstract's 'deduce nontrivial multiband topology' overstates the result. The authors should either prove a stability statement (e.g., a bound or a generic-sign argument that is robust to higher harmonics) or explicitly reframe the claim as a fingerprint/consistency check under an idealized ansatz.
  2. [Main text Eqs. (3)–(5); SM Eq. (69), Eqs. (75)–(76)] The main text defines the geometric susceptibility as χgeo = χxx + χyy + χxy and appears to imply χO = χE + χgeo. However, the SM decomposition (Eq. 69) contains additional geometric terms χ^{(1)}_geo and χ^{(2)}_geo that involve three-band and four-band transitions (SM Eqs. 75–76 and 82–84). These terms generically do not vanish in a multi-band system such as the seven-band Sr2RuO4 model used in Fig. 3. The paper does not state whether the numerical results in Fig. 3 were computed using only the two-band expressions (3)–(5) or the full set of geometric terms. If only the two-band terms were used, χgeo is incomplete and the comparison with χO − χE is quantitatively wrong; if the full set was used, the main-text equations are incomplete and the reader cannot reproduce the calculation. This must be clarified, and the impact on the Sr2RuO4 findings must be reassessed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Main text, Eq. (4)] As written, Eq. (4) reads ∂xεa(∂yεa + ∂xεb)g^{ab}_{yy}, which breaks the x–y symmetry and does not match the SM result (SM Eq. 104). It should presumably be ∂xεa(∂xεa + ∂xεb)g^{ab}_{yy}. Please correct this typo, since a reader relying on the main text alone will get an incorrect expression.
  2. [Discussion] The phrase 'smoking-gun probe' and 'establish orbital magnetization as ... the hallmark response' are too strong given the higher-harmonic and multi-band caveats. A more measured wording such as 'fingerprint' or 'signature' is appropriate.
  3. [Abstract and conclusions] The abstract says 'deduce nontrivial multiband topology, provided knowledge of the energy spectrum', while the Discussion says 'validated upon inserting an analytical ansatz'. These statements should be harmonized; the protocol actually requires both the energy spectrum and an assumed form of the quantum metric.
  4. [SM §I.A (Sr2RuO4 model)] The tight-binding parameters are imported from Ref. [62] without fitting to susceptibility data. It would be helpful to state explicitly that the magnetization curves in Fig. 3 are model predictions, not fits, and to include a caveat that the spin susceptibility in Sr2RuO4 is large and must be accurately subtracted before a quantitative comparison.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The core χE/χgeo decomposition is independent, but the quantitative χgeo↔e2 link rests on a self-cited ideal-metric ansatz that the SM itself admits is not fixed by the Euler class.

  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Main text, 'Discussion and conclusions'; SM Sec. III.C, Eqs. (106)–(108)]
    "The presence of a multiband topological invariant can be validated upon inserting an analytical ansatz for gab μν ∝ |e2|2/|k|2 in Eqs. (3-5), which follows from Eq. (7), in the momentum space neighborhood of the band touchings."

    The invariant e2 that the protocol aims to deduce is already inserted as an input through the metric ansatz in the very equations used for the deduction. The SM's 'Higher angular harmonic contributions' section explicitly states that the patch Euler class 'does not fully constrain the band geometry at the higher harmonic orders' and gives higher-harmonic examples (ξ̃ ∝ sin3θ; ε ∼ k²(1−α cos4θ)) that alter the integrals in Eqs. (3–5) while leaving e2 unchanged. Thus the χgeo↔e2 relation is imposed by the idealized k·p form, and the proposed comparison is a consistency check of that ansatz, not a parameter-free deduction of e2 from data.

  2. self citation load bearing [SM Sec. III.C 'Application to Euler bands', Eqs. (106)–(108), Ref. [14]]
    "as mentioned in the main text ansatz, the multiband geometry can be characterized by metric elements 14:"

    The quantitative link between χgeo and e2 is carried by metric elements Eqs. (106)–(108), whose only cited source is Ref. [14]—the authors' own prior work (Jankowski, Morris, Bouhon, Ünal, Slager, PRB 111, L081103 (2025))—and which the present text itself labels an 'ansatz'. No independent derivation is given here, and the SM concedes that higher angular harmonics (ξ̃ ∝ sin3θ, ε ∼ k²(1−α cos4θ)) are not constrained by the Euler class. The self-citation is therefore load-bearing for the claimed fingerprint without providing the missing uniqueness.

full rationale

The paper's central algebraic decomposition of the Fukuyama formula into χE and χgeo (Eqs. 2–5) is an independent derivation, and the numerical model results compute e2 and χgeo directly from the same Hamiltonian rather than fitting one to the other; those parts are not circular. The circularity concern is confined to the reconstruction protocol: the quantitative deduction of e2 from χgeo requires the ideal quantum-metric ansatz g ∝ |e2|²/k², which is imported from a same-group citation and is explicitly labelled an ansatz, while the SM's own analysis shows the Euler class leaves higher angular harmonics unconstrained. Hence the claimed deduction is better described as a consistency check under an idealized approximation, giving a moderate circularity score rather than a fatal one.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on known linear-response formalism plus a model-dependent ansatz for the quantum metric. The only hand-chosen numbers are the toy-model masses and the imported Sr2RuO4 tight-binding parameters; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Sr2RuO4 tight-binding parameters (εxy, εd, εp, t1–t4) = εxy=-1.9 eV, εd=-0.9 eV, εp=-2.4 eV, t1=1.1, t2=-0.52, t3=0.85, t4=0.1 eV (SM Eq. 19)
    Imported from a prior AARPES fit (Noce & Cuoco 1999); the Sr2RuO4 Euler-node calculation depends on these values.
  • k·p effective masses m1, m2 = unspecified, chosen with m1, m2 < 0
    Hand-chosen to realize an Euler node with both masses negative; the sign-reversal demonstration and the analytic susceptibility in Eqs. (113–115) depend on them.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PT symmetry protects the quantization of the Euler invariant (Eq. 6).
    The Euler class is defined and quantized under spatiotemporal inversion symmetry; the paper relies on this symmetry for the models studied.
  • domain assumption The Fukuyama formula with correction terms (Eq. 1) gives the correct orbital susceptibility.
    The entire decomposition is built on this linear-response formula, cited to Refs. [55–57].
  • domain assumption The decomposition χO = χE + χgeo (with χgeo expressed via quantum metric) is valid.
    Taken from prior work (Gao–Niu, Ogata–Fukuyama, Piéchon et al.), it is the central formal tool.
  • ad hoc to paper The quantum metric of an ideal Euler node has the form g^{ab}_{μν} ∝ |e2|^2/k^2 (SM Eqs. 106–108).
    This ansatz is assumed for the reconstruction protocol and for the analytic susceptibility calculation; the SM admits higher harmonics are not constrained by the Euler class.
  • domain assumption A single-particle tight-binding model describes the relevant bands of Sr2RuO4.
    Correlations and multiband superconductivity are not explicitly included; the model is used to identify Euler invariants and compute susceptibility.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Orbital magnetization reveals multiband topology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FCARWONV

@misc{pith2026251219690,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Orbital magnetization reveals multiband topology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FCARWONV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.19690}
}
abstract

We demonstrate that nontrivial multiband topological invariants of electronic wavefunctions can be revealed through orbital magnetization responses to external magnetic fields. We find that decomposing orbital magnetization into energetic and quantum-geometric contributions allows one to deduce nontrivial multiband topology, provided knowledge of the energy spectrum. We showcase our findings in general effective models with multiband Euler topology. We moreover identify such multiband topological invariants in effective models of strontium ruthenate ($\text{Sr}_2 \text{Ru} \text{O}_4$), which may in principle be verified in the state-of-the-art doping-dependent magnetization measurements. Our reconstruction scheme for multiband invariants sheds a topological perspective on the multiorbital effects in materials realizing unconventional phenomenologies of orbital currents or multiband superconductivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.19690 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Orbital magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Topological bands with Euler charge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Orbital magnetic susceptibility fingerprints topological [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Magnetononlinear Hall effect from multigap topology in metal-organic frameworks

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Non-Abelian multigap topology with Euler class invariants in kagome NHC MOFs induces a controllable magnetononlinear Hall effect.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 4th Edition, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2019)

    R. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 4th Edition, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    Quantized integrated shift effect in multigap topological phases,

    W. J. Jankowski and R.-J. Slager, “Quantized integrated shift effect in multigap topological phases,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 186601 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    Multistate ge- ometry of shift current and polarization,

    A. Avdoshkin, J. Mitscherling, and J. E. Moore, “Multistate ge- ometry of shift current and polarization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 066901 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    Enhanc- ing the hyperpolarizability of crystals with quantum geometry,

    W. J. Jankowski, R.-J. Slager, and M. Pizzochero, “Enhanc- ing the hyperpolarizability of crystals with quantum geometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 126606 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Superfluidity in topologically nontriv- ial flat bands,

    S. Peotta and P . T ¨orm¨a, “Superfluidity in topologically nontriv- ial flat bands,” Nature Communications 6, 1–9 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Topology- bounded superfluid weight in twisted bilayer graphene,

    F. Xie, Z. Song, B. Lian, and B. A. Bernevig, “Topology- bounded superfluid weight in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 167002 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Fragile topology and flat-band superconductivity in the strong-coupling regime,

    V . Peri, Z.-D. Song, B. A. Bernevig, and S. D. Huber, “Fragile topology and flat-band superconductivity in the strong-coupling regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 027002 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Superfluid weight bounds from symmetry and quantum geometry in flat bands,

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, V . Peri, F. Schindler, S. D. Huber, and B. A. Bernevig, “Superfluid weight bounds from symmetry and quantum geometry in flat bands,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 087002 (2022)

    2022

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Light-induced switching between singlet and triplet superconducting states,

    S. Gassner, C. S. Weber, and M. Claassen, “Light-induced switching between singlet and triplet superconducting states,” Nature Communications 15 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Optical sig- natures of Euler superconductors,

    C. W. Chau, W. J. Jankowski, and R.-J. Slager, “Optical sig- natures of Euler superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B 112, 064512 (2025)

    2025

  3. [11]

    Quantum geometric bound for saturated ferromagnetism,

    J. Kang, T. Oh, J. Lee, and B.-J. Y ang, “Quantum geometric bound for saturated ferromagnetism,” (2024), arXiv:2402.07171 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Revisiting the magnetic responses of bilayer graphene from the perspective of quantum distance,

    C.-g. Oh, J.-W. Rhim, and B.-J. Y ang, “Revisiting the magnetic responses of bilayer graphene from the perspective of quantum distance,” Phys. Rev. B 110 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Ferromag- netism vs. antiferromagnetism in narrow-band systems: Com- petition between quantum geometry and band dispersion,

    H. Hu, O. V afek, K. Haule, and B. A. Bernevig, “Ferromag- netism vs. antiferromagnetism in narrow-band systems: Com- petition between quantum geometry and band dispersion,” (2025), arXiv:2509.03575 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Magnetic phase transitions driven by quantum geometry,

    C. g. Oh, T. Kitamura, A. Daido, J.-W. Rhim, and Y . Y anase, “Magnetic phase transitions driven by quantum geometry,” (2025), arXiv:2509.13618 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025

  7. [15]

    Low-frequency diver- gence and quantum geometry of the bulk photovoltaic effect in topological semimetals,

    J. Ahn, G.-Y . Guo, and N. Nagaosa, “Low-frequency diver- gence and quantum geometry of the bulk photovoltaic effect in topological semimetals,” Phys. Rev. X 10, 041041 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Rieman- nian geometry of resonant optical responses,

    J. Ahn, G.-Y . Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath, “Rieman- nian geometry of resonant optical responses,” Nature Physics 18, 290–295 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Quantum geome- try beyond projective single bands,

    A. Bouhon, A. Timmel, and R.-J. Slager, “Quantum geome- try beyond projective single bands,” (2023), arXiv:2303.02180 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Non-trivial quantum geometry and the strength of electron–phonon coupling,

    J. Y u, C. J. Ciccarino, R. Bianco, I. Errea, P . Narang, and B. A. Bernevig, “Non-trivial quantum geometry and the strength of electron–phonon coupling,” Nature Physics 20, 1262–1268 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Optical manifestations and bounds of topological Euler class,

    W. J. Jankowski, A. S. Morris, A. Bouhon, F. N. ¨Unal, and R.-J. Slager, “Optical manifestations and bounds of topological Euler class,” Phys. Rev. B 111, L081103 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Anomalous ge- ometric transport signatures of topological Euler class,

    A. Jain, W. J. Jankowski, and R.-J. Slager, “Anomalous ge- ometric transport signatures of topological Euler class,” Phys. Rev. B 111, 235149 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?

    P . T ¨orm¨a, “Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 240001 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Failure of Nielsen-Ninomiya Theorem and Fragile Topology in Two-Dimensional Systems with Space-Time Inversion Symmetry: Application to Twisted Bilayer Graphene at Magic Angle,

    J. Ahn, S. Park, and B.-J. Y ang, “Failure of Nielsen-Ninomiya Theorem and Fragile Topology in Two-Dimensional Systems with Space-Time Inversion Symmetry: Application to Twisted Bilayer Graphene at Magic Angle,” Phys. Rev. X 9, 021013 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Quantum geometric bounds for observables: Linear responses, Drude weight, and orbital mag- netization,

    K. Shinada and N. Nagaosa, “Quantum geometric bounds for observables: Linear responses, Drude weight, and orbital mag- netization,” Phys. Rev. B 112 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Third-order nonlinear Hall effect induced by the Berry-connection polariz- ability tensor,

    S. Lai, H. Liu, Z. Zhang, J. Zhao, X. Feng, N. Wang, C. Tang, Y . Liu, K. S. Novoselov, S. A. Y ang, and W. Gao, “Third-order nonlinear Hall effect induced by the Berry-connection polariz- ability tensor,” Nature Nanotechnology 16, 869–873 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Signatures of multiband effects in high-harmonic generation in monolayer MoS2,

    L. Y ue, R. Hollinger, C. B. Uzundal, B. Nebgen, Z. Gan, E. Na- jafidehaghani, A. George, C. Spielmann, D. Kartashov, A. Tur- chanin, D. Y . Qiu, M. B. Gaarde, and M. Zuerch, “Signatures of multiband effects in high-harmonic generation in monolayer MoS2,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, ...

    2022

  18. [26]

    Quantum-metric- induced nonlinear transport in a topological antiferromagnet,

    N. Wang, D. Kaplan, Z. Zhang, T. Holder, N. Cao, A. Wang, X. Zhou, F. Zhou, Z. Jiang, C. Zhang, S. Ru, H. Cai, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, B. Y an, and W. Gao, “Quantum-metric- induced nonlinear transport in a topological antiferromagnet,” Nature 621, 487–492 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Quantum metric nonlinear Hall effect in a topological antiferromagnetic heterostructure,

    A. Gao, Y .-F. Liu, J.-X. Qiu, B. Ghosh, T. V . Trevisan, Y . On- ishi, C. Hu, T. Qian, H.-J. Tien, S.-W. Chen, M. Huang, D. B ´erub´e, H. Li, C. Tzschaschel, T. Dinh, Z. Sun, S.-C. Ho, S.-W. Lien, B. Singh, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. C. Bell, H. Lin, T.-R. Chang, C. R. Du,...

    2023

  20. [28]

    Quantized Hall conduc- tance as a topological invariant,

    Q. Niu, D. J. Thouless, and Y .-S. Wu, “Quantized Hall conduc- tance as a topological invariant,” Phys. Rev. B 31, 3372–3377 (1985)

    1985

  21. [29]

    Model for a quantum Hall effect with- out Landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the

    F. D. M. Haldane, “Model for a quantum Hall effect with- out Landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ”parity anomaly”,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015–2018 (1988)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Quantized anomalous Hall effect in magnetic topo- logical insulators,

    R. Y u, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, “Quantized anomalous Hall effect in magnetic topo- logical insulators,” Science 329, 61–64 (2010)

    2010

  23. [31]

    Topological Crystalline Insulators,

    L. Fu, “Topological Crystalline Insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 106802 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    The space group classification of topological band-insulators,

    R.-J. Slager, A. Mesaros, V . Juri ˇci´c, and J. Zaanen, “The space group classification of topological band-insulators,” Na- ture Physics 9, 98 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Topology of crystalline insulators and superconductors,

    K. Shiozaki and M. Sato, “Topology of crystalline insulators and superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 165114 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Topological classification of crystalline insulators through band structure combinatorics,

    J. Kruthoff, J. de Boer, J. van Wezel, C. L. Kane, and R.- J. Slager, “Topological classification of crystalline insulators through band structure combinatorics,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 041069 (2017). 5

    2017

  27. [35]

    Symmetry-based indicators of band topology in the 230 space groups,

    H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, “Symmetry-based indicators of band topology in the 230 space groups,” Nature Communications 8, 50 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Topological quan- tum chemistry,

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. V ergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, “Topological quan- tum chemistry,” Nature 547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    PT -symmetric real Dirac fermions and semimetals,

    Y . X. Zhao and Y . Lu, “PT -symmetric real Dirac fermions and semimetals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 056401 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Non-Abelian band topology in noninteracting metals,

    Q. Wu, A. A. Soluyanov, and T. Bzdu ˇsek, “Non-Abelian band topology in noninteracting metals,” Science 365, 1273–1277 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Non-Abelian reciprocal braiding of Weyl points and its manifestation in ZrTe,

    A. Bouhon, Q. Wu, R.-J. Slager, H. Weng, O. V . Y azyev, and T. Bzduˇsek, “Non-Abelian reciprocal braiding of Weyl points and its manifestation in ZrTe,” Nature Physics 16, 1137–1143 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Geometric approach to fragile topology beyond symmetry indicators,

    A. Bouhon, T. Bzdu ˇsek, and R.-J. Slager, “Geometric approach to fragile topology beyond symmetry indicators,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 115135 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Topological Euler class as a dynamical observable in optical lattices,

    F. N. ¨Unal, A. Bouhon, and R.-J. Slager, “Topological Euler class as a dynamical observable in optical lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 053601 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Experimental observation of non- Abelian topological charges and edge states,

    Q. Guo, T. Jiang, R.-Y . Zhang, L. Zhang, Z.-Q. Zhang, B. Y ang, S. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, “Experimental observation of non- Abelian topological charges and edge states,” Nature 594, 195– 200 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Experimental observation of non- Abelian topological acoustic semimetals and their phase transi- tions,

    B. Jiang, A. Bouhon, Z.-K. Lin, X. Zhou, B. Hou, F. Li, R.- J. Slager, and J.-H. Jiang, “Experimental observation of non- Abelian topological acoustic semimetals and their phase transi- tions,” Nature Physics 17, 1239–1246 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Non-Abelian Flo- quet braiding and anomalous Dirac string phase in periodically driven systems,

    R.-J. Slager, A. Bouhon, and F. N. ¨Unal, “Non-Abelian Flo- quet braiding and anomalous Dirac string phase in periodically driven systems,” Nature Communications 15, 1144 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Exact projected entangled pair ground states with topological Euler invariant,

    Thorsten B. Wahl, W. J. Jankowski, A. Bouhon, G. Chaudhary, and R.-J. Slager, “Exact projected entangled pair ground states with topological Euler invariant,” Nature Communications 16, 284 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    Periodic table for topological insulators and super- conductors,

    A. Kitaev, “Periodic table for topological insulators and super- conductors,” AIP Conference Proceedings 1134, 22–30 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Three-dimensional PT -symmetric topological phases with a Pontryagin index,

    Z. Davoyan, W. J. Jankowski, A. Bouhon, and R.-J. Slager, “Three-dimensional PT -symmetric topological phases with a Pontryagin index,” Phys. Rev. B 109, 165125 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Non-Abelian Hopf-Euler insulators,

    W. J. Jankowski, A. S. Morris, Z. Davoyan, A. Bouhon, F. N. ¨Unal, and R.-J. Slager, “Non-Abelian Hopf-Euler insulators,” Phys. Rev. B 110, 075135 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Probing tensor monopoles and gerbe invariants in three-dimensional topologi- cal matter,

    W. J. Jankowski, R.-J. Slager, and G. Palumbo, “Probing tensor monopoles and gerbe invariants in three-dimensional topologi- cal matter,” (2025), arXiv:2507.22116 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Mag- netic Bloch theorem and reentrant flat bands in twisted bilayer graphene at 2 π flux,

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, A. Chew, and B. A. Bernevig, “Mag- netic Bloch theorem and reentrant flat bands in twisted bilayer graphene at 2 π flux,” Phys. Rev. B 106, 085140 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Landau levels of the Euler class topology,

    Y . Guan, A. Bouhon, and O. V . Y azyev, “Landau levels of the Euler class topology,” Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023188 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Berry phase effects on electronic properties,

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, “Berry phase effects on electronic properties,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959–2007 (2010)

    1959

  45. [53]

    Geometrical effects in orbital magnetic susceptibility,

    Y . Gao, S. A. Y ang, and Q. Niu, “Geometrical effects in orbital magnetic susceptibility,” Phys. Rev. B 91, 214405 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    Orbital Magnetism of Bloch Electrons I. General Formula,

    M. Ogata and H. Fukuyama, “Orbital Magnetism of Bloch Electrons I. General Formula,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 84, 124708 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    Theory of Orbital Magnetism of Bloch Elec- trons: Coulomb Interactions,

    H. Fukuyama, “Theory of Orbital Magnetism of Bloch Elec- trons: Coulomb Interactions,” Progress of Theoretical Physics 45, 704–729 (1971)

    1971

  48. [56]

    Or- bital magnetism in coupled-bands models,

    A. Raoux, F. Pi ´echon, J.-N. Fuchs, and G. Montambaux, “Or- bital magnetism in coupled-bands models,” Phys. Rev. B 91, 085120 (2015)

    2015

  49. [57]

    Measurable lattice effects on the charge and magnetic response in graphene,

    G. G ´omez-Santos and T. Stauber, “Measurable lattice effects on the charge and magnetic response in graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 045504 (2011)

    2011

  50. [58]

    Zur Theorie des Diamagnetismus von Leitungse- lektronen,

    R. Peierls, “Zur Theorie des Diamagnetismus von Leitungse- lektronen,” Zeitschrift fur Physik 80, 763–791 (1933)

    1933

  51. [59]

    I), mag- netic response function of Euler bands (Sec

    See Supplemental Material (SM) at [url] for more details on Lieb lattice models with Euler topology (Sec. I), mag- netic response function of Euler bands (Sec. II), orbital mag- netic susceptibility calculations (Sec. III), and Matsubara sums (Sec. IV). The SM also contains Re...

  52. [60]

    Ge- ometric orbital susceptibility: Quantum metric without Berry curvature,

    F. Pi ´echon, A. Raoux, J.-N. Fuchs, and G. Montambaux, “Ge- ometric orbital susceptibility: Quantum metric without Berry curvature,” Phys. Rev. B 94, 134423 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Wilson loop approach to fragile topology of split elementary band rep- resentations and topological crystalline insulators with time- reversal symmetry,

    A. Bouhon, A. M. Black-Schaffer, and R.-J. Slager, “Wilson loop approach to fragile topology of split elementary band rep- resentations and topological crystalline insulators with time- reversal symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 195135 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    Energy bands and Fermi surface of Sr2RuO4,

    C. Noce and M. Cuoco, “Energy bands and Fermi surface of Sr2RuO4,” Phys. Rev. B 59, 2659–2666 (1999)

    1999

  55. [63]

    Measurements of the quantum geomet- ric tensor in solids,

    M. Kang, S. Kim, Y . Qian, P . M. Neves, L. Y e, J. Jung, D. Pun- tel, F. Mazzola, S. Fang, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Roten- berg, J. Fuji, I. V obornik, J.-H. Park, J. G. Checkelsky, B.-J. Y ang, and R. Comin, “Measurements of the quantum geomet- ric tensor in solids,” Natu...

    2025

  56. [64]

    Direct measurement of the quantum metric tensor in solids,

    S. Kim, Y . Chung, Y . Qian, S. Park, C. Jozwiak, E. Rotenberg, A. Bostwick, K. S. Kim, and B.-J. Y ang, “Direct measurement of the quantum metric tensor in solids,” Science 388, 1050– 1054 (2025)

    2025

  57. [65]

    Field induced positional shift of Bloch electrons and its dynamical implications,

    Y . Gao, S. A. Y ang, and Q. Niu, “Field induced positional shift of Bloch electrons and its dynamical implications,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014)

    2014

  58. [66]

    Semiclassical Theory of Magnetic Energy Lev- els and Magnetic Susceptibility of Bloch Electrons,

    L. M. Roth, “Semiclassical Theory of Magnetic Energy Lev- els and Magnetic Susceptibility of Bloch Electrons,” Phys. Rev. 145, 434–448 (1966)

    1966

  59. [67]

    Zero-field magnetic response functions in Landau levels,

    Y . Gao and Q. Niu, “Zero-field magnetic response functions in Landau levels,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ence 114, 7295–7300 (2017)

    2017

  60. [68]

    Quantum distance and anomalous Landau levels of flat bands,

    J.-W. Rhim, K. Kim, and B.-J. Y ang, “Quantum distance and anomalous Landau levels of flat bands,” Nature 584, 59–63 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    Landau levels, response functions and magnetic oscillations from a generalized Onsager relation,

    J.-N. Fuchs, F. Pi ´echon, and G. Montambaux, “Landau levels, response functions and magnetic oscillations from a generalized Onsager relation,” SciPost Physics 4 (2018). SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL Orbital Magnetization Reveals Multiband Topology Chun Wang Chau, 1, ∗ Robert-Jan Sla...

    2018

  62. [70]

    General decomposition 8

  63. [71]

    Beyond the Fukuyama formula 15 C

    Beyond two-band limit 14 B. Beyond the Fukuyama formula 15 C. Application to Euler bands 19 Higher angular harmonic contributions 21 IV . Details on Matsubara sums 22 References 24 ∗ cwc61@cam.ac.uk † robert-jan.slager@manchester.ac.uk ‡ wjj25@cam.ac.uk 2 I. LIEB LA TTICE MODE...

  64. [72]

    General decomposition To calculate the orbital susceptibility contribution when the geometry is nontrivial, we will begin by rewriting Eq. ( 49), in terms of the projector matrices ( Pa) and band dispersions (εa): χO = e2 ℏ2c2 kBT ∑ n ∑ k ∑ a,b,c,d Tr { (∂xεaPa +εa∂xPa) [ Pb∂y...

  65. [73]

    Two-band limit In the two-band limit, we note that χ(1) geo is always vanishing. Interestingly, in the two-band limits with bands a and b,χ(2) geo is nonvanishing only if a = c, b = d: χ(2) geo = e2 ℏ2c2 kBT ∑ n ∑ k Re [ ( ⣨ a ⏐ ⏐ ⏐∂yb ⟩ ⟨b|∂xa⟩)2] ε4 ab (iωn +µ −εa)2(iωn +µ −...

  66. [74]

    We then note that χ(1) geo is vanishing, and χgeo can be rewritten as: χxy = 4 e2 ℏ2c2 kBT ∑ n ∑ k ε2 ab∂xεb∂yεb (iωn +µ −εb)3(iωn +µ −εa) gab xy + (a ↔ b) = 4 e2 ℏ2c2 ∑ k ε2 ab∂xεa∂yεagab xy       fab ε3 ab − f ′ a ε2 ab + f ′′ a 2εab       + (a ↔ b) = 4 e2 ℏ2c2 ∑...

  67. [75]

    (78-81) can be generalized to any number of bands naturally, by performing 1 2 ∑ a/nequalb, without any change in the function form

    Beyond two-band limit Beyond two-band terms, we note that Eqs. (78-81) can be generalized to any number of bands naturally, by performing 1 2 ∑ a/nequalb, without any change in the function form. However, χ(1) geo is now nonvanishing: χ(1) geo = 4 e2 ℏ2c2 kBT ∑ n ∑ k ∑ a,b,c ε...

  68. [120]

    ( 126) to simplify the expression

    and Eq. ( 126) to simplify the expression. Combining with χE, Eq. ( 78), the total energetic contribution is given by the Landau-Peierls formula 13: χLP = e2 6ℏ2c2 ∑ k ∑ a        ∂2εa ∂k2x ∂2εa ∂k2y − ( ∂2εa ∂kx∂ky )2       f ′ a . (92) Next, we calculate ˜χ2, · ...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.