pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.25053 · v2 · pith:RS62ZOBVnew · submitted 2025-12-31 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· math-ph· math.MP· physics.flu-dyn

Fluid dynamics as intersection problem

Nikita Nekrasov , Paul Wiegmann This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 17:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MPphysics.flu-dyn
keywords fluid dynamicsintersection theorysymplectic geometrycovariant hydrodynamicsKelvin circulation theoremhydrodynamic invariantsself-dual fieldschiral anomaly
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fluid dynamics equations are recast as an intersection problem on an infinite-dimensional symplectic manifold associated with spacetime.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the governing equations of fluid motion arise as an intersection condition inside a symplectic manifold constructed directly from spacetime. This construction isolates the equation of state and the metric geometry from the differential topology of the underlying space. The resulting viewpoint supplies a geometric derivation of the Lichnerowicz-Carter covariant hydrodynamics and accounts for the canonical velocity together with invariants such as the asymptotic Hopf and Ertel invariants. It also produces a generalized Kelvin circulation theorem and identifies a five-dimensional geometric source for the formalism. The same intersection language extends directly to charged fluids, superfluids, and self-dual fields.

Core claim

We formulate the equations of fluid dynamics as an intersection-theoretic problem on an infinite-dimensional symplectic manifold naturally associated with spacetime. This perspective separates the structures determined by the equation of state and the spacetime geometry from the differential-topological data of spacetime. It leads to a geometric derivation of the covariant formulation of hydrodynamics due to Lichnerowicz and Carter, clarifies the role of the canonical velocity and hydrodynamic invariants, including the asymptotic Hopf invariant and the Ertel invariant, and yields a generalized Kelvin circulation theorem. We also explain the relation between the canonical velocity, the four-1

What carries the argument

Infinite-dimensional symplectic manifold naturally associated with spacetime, on which the fluid equations appear as an intersection condition.

Load-bearing premise

Spacetime admits a natural infinite-dimensional symplectic manifold structure such that the fluid equations become precisely an intersection condition cleanly separating the equation of state and geometry from topological data.

What would settle it

Explicit construction of the manifold for a concrete spacetime and equation of state, followed by direct verification that the resulting intersection condition reproduces the Euler equations and the known circulation theorem for that fluid.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.25053 by Nikita Nekrasov, Paul Wiegmann.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The coisotropic CM4 and Lagrangian Lε,g inside PM4 two nearly middle-dimensional subvarieties of PM4 : (1.3) Φ ∈ CM4 ∩ Lε,g ⊂ PM4 of the infinite-dimensional symplectic manifold PM4 , associated with M4 . The coisotropic subvariety CM4 is defined in purely differential topological terms, it is the zero locus of the moment map for the group2 (1.4) G (1) M4 = Diff(M4 ) × C ∞(M4 ) acting on PM4 by symplectomo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Le S Quasi-periodic function S(x 1 , x2 ) obeying (7.34) S(x 1 , x2 ) = S(x 1 + 2π, x2 ) − 2πaℓ1x 1 − 2πbℓ2x 2 = S(x 1 , x2 + 2π) − 2πcℓ1x 1 − 2πdℓ2x 2 with some a, b, c, d ∈ Z defines a Lagrangian submanifold LS in the familar fashion: (7.35) pi = ∂iS , i = 1, 2 Now let us deform ω0 → ωk = ω0 + kdx1 ∧ dx2 with constant k ∈ R. The submanifold (7.35) is no longer Lagrangian, ωk|LS = kdx1 ∧ dx2 ̸= 0. Deformi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We formulate the equations of fluid dynamics as an intersection-theoretic problem on an infinite-dimensional symplectic manifold naturally associated with spacetime. This perspective separates the structures determined by the equation of state and the spacetime geometry from the differential-topological data of spacetime. It leads to a geometric derivation of the covariant formulation of hydrodynamics due to Lichnerowicz and Carter, clarifies the role of the canonical velocity and hydrodynamic invariants, including the asymptotic Hopf invariant and the Ertel invariant, and yields a generalized Kelvin circulation theorem. We also explain the relation between the canonical velocity, the four-velocity, and other choices of hydrodynamic frame. In addition, we identify a five-dimensional geometric origin of the formalism underlying covariant hydrodynamics. The formalism extends naturally to fluids with additional degrees of freedom, including multicomponent fluids, charged fluids, and superfluids, and incorporates the chiral anomaly and Onsager quantization. It also suggests a possible bridge between hydrodynamics, Poisson sigma models, and topological field theories. We further argue that the same intersection-theoretic viewpoint applies to self-dual fields, including chiral bosons in 1+1 dimensions, tensor fields of the (2,0) theory in 1+5 dimensions, and the self-dual four-form field of type-IIB supergravity in 1+9 dimensions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates the equations of fluid dynamics as an intersection-theoretic problem on an infinite-dimensional symplectic manifold naturally associated with spacetime. This perspective is claimed to separate structures determined by the equation of state and spacetime geometry from differential-topological data, yielding a geometric derivation of the Lichnerowicz-Carter covariant hydrodynamics, clarification of the canonical velocity and invariants (asymptotic Hopf and Ertel), a generalized Kelvin circulation theorem, extensions to multicomponent/charged/superfluids with chiral anomaly and Onsager quantization, a five-dimensional geometric origin, and an analogous intersection viewpoint for self-dual fields including chiral bosons, (2,0) tensor fields, and type-IIB self-dual four-forms.

Significance. If the central construction is non-tautological and the derivations hold, the work supplies a unifying geometric framework that cleanly isolates equation-of-state and metric data from topological input while recovering standard results and suggesting links to Poisson sigma models and topological field theories. The claimed separation of structures and the five-dimensional origin would constitute a substantive contribution to covariant hydrodynamics if rigorously established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Introduction and central construction] The definition of the infinite-dimensional symplectic manifold 'naturally associated with spacetime' (Introduction and central construction section) must be given explicitly, including the precise symplectic form and how the intersection condition is imposed, to demonstrate that it reproduces the Euler or Navier-Stokes equations without incorporating them by construction.
  2. [Covariant hydrodynamics derivation] The geometric derivation of the Lichnerowicz-Carter covariant formulation (section on covariant hydrodynamics) should contain an explicit step-by-step comparison with the standard equations, identifying which steps rely on the intersection condition versus standard symplectic geometry.
  3. [Hydrodynamic invariants and Kelvin theorem] The generalized Kelvin circulation theorem (section on hydrodynamic invariants) requires a concrete check against the classical theorem for a specific flow (e.g., irrotational or barotropic) to confirm the generalization is non-trivial and not merely a restatement.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Velocity and frame choices] Clarify the precise relation between canonical velocity, four-velocity, and hydrodynamic frame choices with explicit transformation equations.
  2. [Extensions to additional degrees of freedom] The extensions to charged fluids and the chiral anomaly should include at least one worked example showing how the intersection condition incorporates the anomaly term.
  3. [Five-dimensional origin] Notation for the five-dimensional geometric origin should be introduced with a diagram or explicit coordinate chart to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We agree that additional explicitness in the central construction and derivations will improve clarity and address concerns about tautology. We will implement revisions as detailed below to strengthen the manuscript while preserving its geometric perspective.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The definition of the infinite-dimensional symplectic manifold 'naturally associated with spacetime' (Introduction and central construction section) must be given explicitly, including the precise symplectic form and how the intersection condition is imposed, to demonstrate that it reproduces the Euler or Navier-Stokes equations without incorporating them by construction.

    Authors: We will expand the Introduction and central construction section with a fully explicit definition. The infinite-dimensional manifold is the space of sections of the bundle of 1-forms (or momentum maps) over spacetime, equipped with the symplectic form induced by the spacetime volume form paired with the equation of state via the standard symplectic structure on the cotangent bundle. The intersection condition is imposed by requiring the section to lie in the zero set of a canonical 1-form whose exterior derivative yields the Euler equation through the symplectic geometry; this derives the hydrodynamic equations from the intersection rather than assuming them a priori. The revised text will include the coordinate expressions and a proof that the resulting equations match the standard Euler equations for a given EOS without circularity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The geometric derivation of the Lichnerowicz-Carter covariant formulation (section on covariant hydrodynamics) should contain an explicit step-by-step comparison with the standard equations, identifying which steps rely on the intersection condition versus standard symplectic geometry.

    Authors: We will revise the covariant hydrodynamics section to include a detailed side-by-side comparison. We will first state the standard Lichnerowicz-Carter equations, then map each term: the intersection condition supplies the dynamical force-balance equation, while the underlying symplectic structure (independent of the intersection) accounts for the conservation of the canonical momentum and the frame-independent formulation. This will explicitly separate the novel intersection input from standard symplectic geometry results, with numbered steps showing the derivation. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The generalized Kelvin circulation theorem (section on hydrodynamic invariants) requires a concrete check against the classical theorem for a specific flow (e.g., irrotational or barotropic) to confirm the generalization is non-trivial and not merely a restatement.

    Authors: We will add a concrete verification subsection. For a barotropic irrotational flow, we will explicitly compute the circulation integral using the generalized theorem and show it reduces precisely to the classical Kelvin theorem, with the extra terms vanishing due to the barotropic condition. For a non-barotropic case we will demonstrate the additional invariants arising from the intersection, confirming the generalization is non-trivial. This example will be worked out in coordinates for a simple steady flow. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; reformulation via new geometric structure

full rationale

The paper presents a geometric reformulation of fluid dynamics by associating an infinite-dimensional symplectic manifold with spacetime such that the equations appear as an intersection condition. This construction is motivated by and incorporates the known structure of hydrodynamics, equation of state, and spacetime geometry, but does not reduce any claimed prediction or first-principles result to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition by construction. The separation of structures, derivation of the Lichnerowicz-Carter formulation, and generalized theorems are presented as consequences of the new viewpoint rather than tautological restatements of the input equations. No load-bearing step relies on self-citation chains or ansatze smuggled from prior work in a way that forces the central claim. The approach is self-contained as an interpretive framework with independent content for extensions to anomalies and other fields.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of a natural infinite-dimensional symplectic manifold for spacetime and on standard properties of intersection theory and symplectic geometry; no free parameters or new invented entities are visible in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spacetime admits a natural infinite-dimensional symplectic manifold on which fluid equations become an intersection condition
    Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract as the starting point for separating equation-of-state structures from topological data.
  • standard math Standard results of symplectic geometry and intersection theory apply directly to this manifold
    Used to derive the Lichnerowicz-Carter formulation and the generalized Kelvin theorem.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5764 in / 1431 out tokens · 91842 ms · 2026-05-21T17:06:23.865291+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Fendley, Strong zero modes and eigenstate phase transitions in the XY Z/interacting Majorana chain , J

    A. Abanov and P. Wiegmann,Anomalies in fluid dynamics: flows in a chiral back- ground via variational principle, J. Phys. A55, no.41, 414001 (2022) doi:10.1088/1751- 8121/ac9202 [arXiv:2207.10195 [hep-th]]. A. Abanov, P. Wiegmann,Chiral anomaly in Euler fluid and Beltrami flow, JHEP06, 038 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2022)038 [arXiv:2202.12437 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1751- 2022

  2. [2]

    Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories

    L. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa,Liouville correlation functions from four-dimensional gauge theories, Lett. Math. Phys.91(2010), no. 2, 167–197, doi:10.1007/s11005-010-0369-5 [hep-th/0906.3219]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11005-010-0369-5 2010

  3. [3]

    The Geometry of the Master Equation and Topological Quantum Field Theory

    M. Alexandrov, A. Schwarz, O. Zaboronsky and M. Kontsevich,The Geometry of the master equation and topological quantum field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A12, 1405-1429 (1997) doi:10.1142/S0217751X97001031 [arXiv:hep-th/9502010 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217751x97001031 1997

  4. [4]

    Arnold,Mathematical methods of classical mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathe- matics (GTM, volume 60), Springer, 1989

    V. Arnold,Mathematical methods of classical mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathe- matics (GTM, volume 60), Springer, 1989

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    Arnold, B

    V. Arnold, B. Khesin,Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74278-2, Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74278-2 2021

  6. [6]

    Target space symmetries in topological theories I

    L. Baulieu, A. Losev and N. Nekrasov,Target space symmetries in topological theories, JHEP02, 021 (2002) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/02/021 [arXiv:hep-th/0106042 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/02/021 2002

  7. [7]

    Beilinson and V

    A. Beilinson and V. Drinfeld,Quantization of Hitchin’s in- tegrable system and Hecke eigensheaves, Preprint available at http://www.math.uchicago.edu/ drinfeld/langlands/QuantizationHitchin.pdf

    work page

  8. [8]

    Opers

    A. Beilinson and V. Drinfeld,Opers,http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0501398

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Super-Poincare Covariant Quantization of the Superstring

    N. Berkovits,Super Poincare covariant quantization of the superstring, JHEP04, 018 (2000) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/04/018 [arXiv:hep-th/0001035 [hep-th]]. 46 NIKITA NEKRASOV, PAUL WIEGMANN

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/04/018 2000

  10. [10]

    Belavin, A

    A. Belavin, A. Polyakov and A. Zamolodchikov,Infinite conformal symmetry of critical fluctuations in two-dimensions, J. Statist. Phys.34(1984), no. 5-6, 763–774, doi:10.1007/BF01009438, ∼∼∼,Infinite Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. B241(1984), no. 2, 333–380, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90052-X

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01009438 1984

  11. [11]

    Bilal, V

    A. Bilal, V. V. Fock and I. I. Kogan,On the origin of W algebras, Nucl. Phys. B359, 635-672 (1991) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90075-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90075-9 1991

  12. [12]

    From Navier-Stokes To Einstein

    I. Bredberg, C. Keeler, V. Lysov and A. Strominger,From Navier-Stokes To Einstein, JHEP07, 146 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)146 [arXiv:1101.2451 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2012)146 2012

  13. [13]

    Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity

    S. Bhattacharyya, V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla and M. Rangamani,Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity, JHEP02, 045 (2008) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/045 [arXiv:0712.2456 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/045 2008

  14. [14]

    Non-Abelian Fluid Dynamics in Lagrangian Formulation

    B. Bistrovic, R. Jackiw, H. Li, V. P. Nair and S. Y. Pi,NonAbelian fluid dynamics in Lagrangian formulation, Phys. Rev. D67, 025013 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.025013 [arXiv:hep-th/0210143 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.025013 2003

  15. [15]

    Defects and Quantum Seiberg-Witten Geometry

    M. Bullimore, H. Kim and P. Koroteev,Defects and quantum Seiberg-Witten geome- try, JHEP05(2015), 095, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2015)095 [hep-th/1412.6081]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2015)095 2015

  16. [16]

    Carter, B

    B. Carter, B. Gaffet,Standard covariant formulation for perfect-fluid dynamics, J.Fluid Mech. 186 (1988) 1. B. Carter, in Active Galactic Nuclei, ed. C. Hazard S. Mitton (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979)

    work page 1988

  17. [17]

    On the AKSZ formulation of the Poisson sigma model

    A. Cattaneo and G. Felder,On the AKSZ formulation of the Poisson sigma model, Lett. Math. Phys.56, 163-179 (2001) doi:10.1023/A:1010963926853 [arXiv:math/0102108 [math]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1023/a:1010963926853 2001

  18. [18]

    Coisotropic submanifolds in Poisson geometry and branes in the Poisson sigma model

    A. Cattaneo and G. Felder,Coisotropic submanifolds in Poisson geometry and branes in the Poisson sigma model, Lett. Math. Phys.69, 157-175 (2004) doi:10.1007/s11005- 004-0609-7 [arXiv:math/0309180 [math.QA]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11005- 2004

  19. [19]

    A path integral approach to the Kontsevich quantization formula

    A. Cattaneo and G. Felder,A Path integral approach to the Kontsevich quantiza- tion formula, Commun. Math. Phys.212, 591-611 (2000) doi:10.1007/s002200000229 [arXiv:math/9902090 [math]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s002200000229 2000

  20. [20]

    Gauge Theory Loop Operators and Liouville Theory

    N. Drukker, J. Gomis, T. Okuda and J. Teschner,Gauge theory loop operators and Liouville theory, JHEP1002, 057 (2010), doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2010)057 [hep- th/0909.1105]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2010)057 2010

  21. [21]

    Etingof, E

    P. Etingof, E. Frenkel and D. Kazhdan,An analytic version of the Langlands corre- spondence for complex curves, [arXiv:1908.09677 [math.AG]]

    work page arXiv 1908

  22. [22]

    Etingof, E

    P. Etingof, E. Frenkel and D. Kazhdan,Hecke operators and analytic Langlands cor- respondence for curves over local fields, Duke Math. J.172, no.11, 2015-2071 (2023) doi:10.1215/00127094-2022-0068 [arXiv:2103.01509 [math.AG]]

    work page doi:10.1215/00127094-2022-0068 2015

  23. [23]

    V. A. Fateev and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Operator algebra and correlation functions in the two-dimensional Wess-ZuminoSU(2)×SU(2)Chiral Model, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 43(1986), 657–664

    work page 1986

  24. [24]

    V. Fock, N. Nekrasov, A. Rosly and K. Selivanov,What we think about the higher dimensional Chern-Simons theories, Contribution to: The First International A.D. Sakharov Conference on Physics, ITEP-91-70

    work page

  25. [25]

    Surface Operators and Separation of Variables

    E. Frenkel, S. Gukov and J. Teschner,Surface operators and separation of variables, JHEP1601(2016), no. 1, 179, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)179 [hep-th/1506.07508]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2016)179 2016

  26. [26]

    N=2 dualities

    D. Gaiotto,N=2 dualities, JHEP1208, 034 (2012), doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2012)034 [hep-th/0904.2715]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2012)034 2012

  27. [27]

    Gaiotto and J

    D. Gaiotto and J. Teschner,Quantum analytic Langlands correspondence, SciPost Phys.18, no.4, 144 (2025) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.18.4.144 [arXiv:2402.00494 [hep- th]]. FLUID DYNAMICS AS INTERSECTION PROBLEM 47

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.18.4.144 2025

  28. [28]

    Hamiltonian systems of Calogero type and two dimensional Yang-Mills theory

    A. Gorsky and N. Nekrasov,Hamiltonian systems of Calogero type and two- dimensional Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B414, 213-238 (1994) doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(94)90429-4 [arXiv:hep-th/9304047 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550- 1994

  29. [29]

    Branes and Quantization

    S. Gukov and E. Witten,Branes and quantization, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.13 (2009), no. 5, 1445–1518, doi:10.4310/ATMP.2009.v13.n5.a5 [hep-th/0809.0305]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.2009.v13.n5.a5 2009

  30. [30]

    D. Holm, J. Marsden, T. Ratiu,The Euler–Poincar´ e equations and semidirect prod- ucts with applications to continuum theories, Advances in Mathematics,137(1) (1998) 1-81, [arXiv:9801015 [chao-dyn]]

    work page 1998

  31. [31]

    Perfect Fluid Theory and its Extensions

    R. Jackiw, V. P. Nair, S. Y. Pi and A. P. Polychronakos,Perfect fluid theory and its extensions, J. Phys. A37, R327-R432 (2004) doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/42/R01 [arXiv:hep-ph/0407101 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/42/r01 2004

  32. [32]

    Kapustin and D

    A. Kapustin and D. Orlov,Remarks onA-branes, mirror symmetry, and the Fukaya category, J. Geom. Phys.48, 84 (2003) doi:10.1016/S0393-0440(03)00026-3 [arXiv:hep- th/0109098 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0393-0440(03)00026-3 2003

  33. [33]

    Knizhnik and A

    V. Knizhnik and A. Zamolodchikov,Current algebra and Wess-Zumino model in two- dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B247(1984), no. 1, 83–103, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90374-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90374-2 1984

  34. [34]

    Kontsevich,Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds

    M. Kontsevich,Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. 1., Lett. Math. Phys. 66, 157-216 (2003) doi:10.1023/B:MATH.0000027508.00421.bf [arXiv:q-alg/9709040 [math.QA]]

    work page doi:10.1023/b:math.0000027508.00421.bf 2003

  35. [35]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz,Fluid Mechanics, Volume6of theCourse of Theoretical Physics, Second English Edition, 1987, Pergamon Press

    work page 1987

  36. [36]

    Lichnerowicz,Relativistic hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamic: lectures on the existence of solutions, 1967, W

    A. Lichnerowicz,Relativistic hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamic: lectures on the existence of solutions, 1967, W. A. Benjamin New York

    work page 1967

  37. [37]

    Classical Conformal Blocks and Painleve VI

    A. Litvinov, S. Lukyanov, N. Nekrasov and A. Zamolodchikov,Classical Con- formal Blocks and Painleve VI, JHEP07, 144 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)144 [arXiv:1309.4700 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)144 2014

  38. [38]

    A. S. Losev, P. Mnev and D. R. Youmans,Two-dimensional non-abelian BF theory in Lorenz gauge as a solvable logarithmic TCFT, Commun. Math. Phys.376, no.2, 993-1052 (2019) doi:10.1007/s00220-019-03638-7 [arXiv:1902.02738 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-019-03638-7 2019

  39. [39]

    Conservation laws and evolution schemes in geodesic, hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic flows

    C. Markakis, K. Ury¯ u, E. Gourgoulhon, J. Nicolas, N. Andersson, A. Pouri and V. Witzany,Conservation laws and evolution schemes in geodesic, hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic flows, Phys. Rev. D96, no.6, 064019 (2017), [arXiv:1612.09308 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    N. A. Nekrasov,Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.7(2003), no. 5, 831–864, doi:10.4310/ATMP.2003.v7.n5.a4 [hep- th/0206161]

    work page doi:10.4310/atmp.2003.v7.n5.a4 2003

  41. [41]

    Langlands Program and Physics

    N. Nekrasov,On the BPS/CFT correspondence, Lecture at the University of Ams- terdam string theory group seminar, Feb. 3, 2004, ∼∼∼,2d CFT-type equations from 4d gauge theory, Lecture at the “Langlands Program and Physics” conference, IAS, Princeton, March 8-10, 2004

    work page 2004

  42. [42]

    N. NekrasovNon-Perturbative Schwinger-Dyson equations: from BPS/CFT corre- spondence to the novel symmetries of quantum field theory, Phys.-Usp.57(2014), 133– 149, doi:10.1142/9789814616850 0008, ∼∼∼,BPS/CFT correspondence: non-perturbative Dyson-Schwinger equations andqq- characters, JHEP1603, 181 (2016), [hep-th/1512.05388]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789814616850 2014

  43. [43]

    Darboux coordinates, Yang-Yang functional, and gauge theory

    N. Nekrasov, A. Rosly and S. Shatashvili,Darboux coordinates, Yang-Yang functional, and gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.216(2011), 69–93, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2011.04.150 [hep-th/1103.3919]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2011.04.150 2011

  44. [44]

    The Omega Deformation, Branes, Integrability, and Liouville Theory

    N. Nekrasov and E. Witten,The Omega deformation, branes, integrability, and Liou- ville theory, JHEP1009, 092 (2010), doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2010)092 [hep-th/1002.0888]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2010)092 2010

  45. [45]

    S. Novikov,Hamiltonian formalism and a many-valued analogue of Morse theory, Uspekhi Mathematical Nauk, 1982, vol 37, N 5, pp 1-56, 48 NIKITA NEKRASOV, PAUL WIEGMANN English translation available from Andrew Ranicki’s Homepage https://webhomes.maths.ed.ac.uk/∼v1ranick/papers/novmult.pdf

    work page 1982

  46. [46]

    Olshanetsky and A

    M. Olshanetsky and A. Perelomov,Classical integrable finite dimensional systems related to Lie algebras, Phys. Rept.71, 313 (1981) doi:10.1016/0370-1573(81)90023-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(81)90023-5 1981

  47. [47]

    Schaller and T

    P. Schaller and T. Strobl,Poisson structure induced (topological) field theories, Mod. Phys. Lett. A9, 3129-3136 (1994) doi:10.1142/S0217732394002951 [arXiv:hep- th/9405110 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732394002951 1994

  48. [48]

    Seliger, G.B

    R.L. Seliger, G.B. Whitham,Variational principles in continuum mechanics.Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 1968 May 21;305(1480):1-25

    work page 1968

  49. [49]

    Quantisation conditions of the quantum Hitchin system and the real geometric Langlands correspondence

    J. Teschner,Quantisation conditions of the quantum Hitchin system and the real geometric Langlands correspondence, [arXiv:1707.07873 [math-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Wiegmann,Multivalued Wess-Zumino-Novikov Functional and Chiral Anomaly in Hydrodynamics, [arXiv:2403.19909 [hep-th]]

    P. Wiegmann,Multivalued Wess-Zumino-Novikov Functional and Chiral Anomaly in Hydrodynamics, [arXiv:2403.19909 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Wiegmann,Chern-Simons modification of fluid mechanics, Phys

    P. Wiegmann,Chern-Simons modification of fluid mechanics, Phys. Lett. B868, 139726 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139726 [arXiv:2405.09751 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139726 2025

  52. [52]

    Mirror Manifolds And Topological Field Theory

    E. Witten,Mirror manifolds and topological field theory, AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math. 9, 121-160 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9112056 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  53. [53]

    Structure Constants and Conformal Bootstrap in Liouville Field Theory

    A. Zamolodchikov, Al. Zamolodchikov,Structure Constants and Conformal Bootstrap in Liouville Field Theory, arXiv:hep-th/9506136v2 N Simons Center for Geometry and Physics, Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stony Brook NY 11794-3636, W Leinweber Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kadanoff Center for Theoretical Physics and Enrico Fermi Insti- tute, U...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv