arxiv: 2601.06346 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-09 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th· physics.hist-ph

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

On Causality and Predictivity

Damiano Anselmi

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 15:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-thphysics.hist-ph

keywords causalityquantum gravitymicrocausalityfakeonspredictivityunitarityrenormalizabilitymetaphysics

0 comments

The pith

Causality rests on metaphysical assumptions and should be abandoned in fundamental physics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how approaches to quantum gravity, including those using fakeons, must sacrifice microcausality to maintain both renormalizability and unitarity. It argues that the cause-effect relation and the arrow of time are statistical illusions driven by unruly disruptors at microscopic scales. Causation itself requires belief in external entities that act on nature without belonging to it, making the concept borderline and misleading. If correct, this means renouncing microcausality is not just acceptable but necessary, and the broader notion of causality should be dropped entirely from fundamental physics.

Core claim

Renouncing microcausality is a reasonable price to pay for a consistent and predictive theory of quantum gravity, as in the fakeon approach, and the very notion of causality is misleading because it rests on metaphysical assumptions about external agents and an illusory statistical arrow of time; it should therefore be abandoned in fundamental physics.

What carries the argument

The fakeon concept of purely virtual particles that sacrifices the cause-effect relation at small scales to reconcile renormalizability with unitarity.

Load-bearing premise

The premise that causality is inherently statistical, illusory at microscopic scales, and dependent on belief in external entities acting on nature.

What would settle it

Discovery of a renormalizable, unitary quantum gravity theory that preserves strict microcausality at all scales without statistical or emergent approximations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.06346 by Damiano Anselmi.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Prepostidictions crossed O in their past histories, but cross the past light cone of an event of our future ˆ trajectory, an example being P, the past light cone with tip at P. ˆ Consider a body moving along the hyperbolic motion defined by the trajectory X(t) shown in the figure: x 2 − (t − t+) 2 = r 2 , x ⩾ r. Its past (t < 0) does not intersect O (our past light cone at ˆ t = 0). Its future (t > 0) cros… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Certain approaches to quantum gravity, such as the one based on the concept of purely virtual particles (fakeons), sacrifice the cause-effect relation at very small scales to reconcile renormalizability with unitarity. Other developments have also urged caution regarding the idea of causality as a fundamental principle. In this paper, we examine the problem from multiple perspectives, including locality and predictivity, and extend the existing skepticism in several directions. Emphasizing the impact of unruly "disruptors", we point out that the illusory arrow of time associated with causality and predictivity is inherently statistical. This renders the cause-effect relation strained at the microscopic level. We also show that causation is a borderline concept that demands belief in entities which can act on nature without being part of it. Ultimately, not only is renouncing microcausality a reasonable price to pay for a consistent and predictive theory of quantum gravity (as is the one based on the fakeon idea), but the very notion of causality is misleading. Resting as it does on metaphysical assumptions, it should therefore be abandoned in fundamental physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is an interpretive essay arguing to abandon causality in fundamental physics on metaphysical grounds, with no new technical results or derivations.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that Anselmi claims causality itself is misleading and should be dropped from fundamental physics, not just microcausality at small scales. He points to the fakeon approach as a working example where sacrificing cause-effect at short distances buys renormalizability and unitarity, and he extends this to argue that the arrow of time is statistical while causation requires belief in external entities acting on nature from outside it. The paper pulls together angles on locality, predictivity, and what it calls unruly disruptors that strain ordinary cause-effect relations. That framing is clear and consistent with the author's prior work on fakeons. It does a reasonable job spelling out why someone already skeptical of standard quantum gravity assumptions might see causality as more trouble than it's worth. The discussion of statistical time arrows and borderline concepts like causation is straightforward and avoids unnecessary jargon. The soft spots are exactly what you'd expect from an essay without new calculations. There are no derivations, no checks against specific models, and no independent evidence presented to support the claim that causality is inherently illusory at microscopic scales. The argument leans on interpretive premises about metaphysics and external actors, which makes parts of it feel self-referential rather than grounded in fresh results. If those premises are not accepted, the call to abandon causality does not follow from anything demonstrated in the text. The citation pattern stays mostly within the fakeon literature, which is fine for continuity but does not bring in external benchmarks or falsifiable tests. This piece is aimed at readers already engaged with foundational debates in quantum gravity and philosophy of physics, especially those following the fakeon line. A technical reader looking for new predictions, theorems, or data will not find them. I would not bring it to a reading group focused on concrete models or calculations. It does not contain results I would cite in my own work. For peer review, I would recommend desk rejection because the paper offers no formal content that referees could meaningfully evaluate or verify.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that certain quantum gravity approaches, such as the fakeon framework, can sacrifice microcausality at small scales to reconcile renormalizability with unitarity. It extends existing skepticism about causality by claiming that the arrow of time is inherently statistical and illusory at microscopic scales due to 'disruptors,' that causation is a borderline concept requiring belief in external entities acting on nature, and that causality itself rests on metaphysical assumptions and should therefore be abandoned in fundamental physics.

Significance. If the interpretive case holds, the paper could contribute to foundational debates in quantum gravity by questioning the necessity of causality and predictivity as guiding principles, potentially supporting exploration of non-causal models. It builds on prior work on fakeons but offers no new derivations, theorems, or empirical tests.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central conclusion that 'the very notion of causality is misleading' and 'should therefore be abandoned' rests on the premise that causation 'demands belief in entities which can act on nature without being part of it'; this premise is asserted without a formal philosophical derivation or engagement with standard causal structures in QFT (e.g., commutators of local operators), rendering the call to abandon causality interpretive rather than demonstrated.
[Discussion of the arrow of time] Discussion of the arrow of time: The claim that the 'illusory arrow of time associated with causality and predictivity is inherently statistical' is load-bearing for the argument that cause-effect is strained at micro scales, yet no explicit statistical model, derivation from the second law, or reference to a specific theorem is supplied to show necessity rather than interpretive stance.

minor comments (1)

The manuscript would benefit from explicit section numbering and clearer transitions between the fakeon example and the broader philosophical claims to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address the major comments point by point below, preserving the interpretive character of the manuscript while clarifying its engagement with existing literature where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central conclusion that 'the very notion of causality is misleading' and 'should therefore be abandoned' rests on the premise that causation 'demands belief in entities which can act on nature without being part of it'; this premise is asserted without a formal philosophical derivation or engagement with standard causal structures in QFT (e.g., commutators of local operators), rendering the call to abandon causality interpretive rather than demonstrated.

Authors: The manuscript is framed as a multi-perspective examination that extends existing skepticism about causality in quantum gravity, rather than a formal philosophical derivation. The premise concerning external entities is drawn from standard critiques in the philosophy of physics (e.g., that causation cannot be primitive within a closed physical system). We engage with QFT causal structures by noting that microcausality, expressed via commutators of local operators at spacelike separation, is an assumption that the fakeon framework relaxes at small scales to reconcile renormalizability and unitarity. We will add a short clarifying paragraph referencing these commutator conditions and their relaxation in the revised version. revision: partial
Referee: [Discussion of the arrow of time] Discussion of the arrow of time: The claim that the 'illusory arrow of time associated with causality and predictivity is inherently statistical' is load-bearing for the argument that cause-effect is strained at micro scales, yet no explicit statistical model, derivation from the second law, or reference to a specific theorem is supplied to show necessity rather than interpretive stance.

Authors: The statistical character of the arrow of time is presented conceptually, relying on the established emergence of irreversibility from the second law in statistical mechanics, where low-entropy boundary conditions and probabilistic fluctuations (the 'disruptors') render strict cause-effect relations strained at microscopic scales. No new derivation or theorem is offered, as the paper focuses on implications for quantum gravity rather than re-deriving statistical mechanics. We will incorporate additional references to specific results on the statistical arrow of time (e.g., from works on fluctuation theorems and emergent irreversibility) in the revised manuscript to make the supporting literature more explicit. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a philosophical essay that extends interpretive skepticism about causality and microcausality in the context of the fakeon approach to quantum gravity. It contains no technical derivation chain, equations, fitted parameters, or load-bearing uniqueness theorems. The central claim that causality rests on metaphysical assumptions and should be abandoned is presented as an interpretive stance rather than a result derived from self-referential definitions or self-citations that reduce the argument to its own inputs by construction. No steps match the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on interpretive assumptions about the statistical nature of causality and its metaphysical basis without providing independent evidence or derivations from prior literature.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The arrow of time associated with causality is inherently statistical
Stated directly in the abstract as rendering the cause-effect relation strained at the microscopic level.
ad hoc to paper Causation is a borderline concept requiring belief in entities that act on nature without being part of it
Presented as a key point in the abstract to support abandoning causality.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5476 in / 1244 out tokens · 44063 ms · 2026-05-16T15:25:31.913343+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction contradicts

?

contradicts
CONTRADICTS: the theorem conflicts with this paper passage, or marks a claim that would need revision before publication.

Ultimately, not only is renouncing microcausality a reasonable price to pay... but the very notion of causality is misleading. Resting as it does on metaphysical assumptions, it should therefore be abandoned in fundamental physics.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArrowOfTime.lean arrow_from_z contradicts

?

contradicts
CONTRADICTS: the theorem conflicts with this paper passage, or marks a claim that would need revision before publication.

the illusory arrow of time associated with causality and predictivity is inherently statistical... renders the cause-effect relation strained at the microscopic level.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArrowOfTime.lean z_monotone_absolute echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

fakeon theories imply that the universe is endowed with a 'radial arrow' pointing from the microscopic 'stormy sea' to the macroscopic 'desert expanse'

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

[1]

Hume,An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Chicago, The Open court publishing co.,1900, available at this link

D. Hume,An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Chicago, The Open court publishing co.,1900, available at this link

work page 1900
[2]

On the quantum field theory of the gravitational interactions

D. Anselmi, On the quantum field theory of the gravitational interactions, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 086, 17A3 Renorm and arXiv: 1704.07728 [hep-th]. 29

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[3]

Quantum Gravity, Fakeons And Microcausality

D. Anselmi and M. Piva, Quantum gravity, fakeons and microcausality, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 21, 18A3 Renorm and arXiv:1806.03605 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[4]

A new formulation of Lee-Wick quantum field theory

D. Anselmi and M. Piva, A new formulation of Lee-Wick quantum field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 066, 17A1 Renorm and arXiv:1703.04584 [hep-th]; D. Anselmi, Fakeons and Lee-Wick models, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 141, 18A1 Renorm and arXiv:1801.00915 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[5]

Anselmi, Diagrammar of physical and fake particles and spectral optical theorem, J

D. Anselmi, Diagrammar of physical and fake particles and spectral optical theorem, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 030, 21A5 Renorm and arXiv: 2109.06889 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[6]

Anselmi, A new quantization principle from a minimally non time-ordered product, J

D. Anselmi, A new quantization principle from a minimally non time-ordered product, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 088, 22A5 Renorm and arXiv:2210.14240 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[7]

Anselmi, E

D. Anselmi, E. Bianchi and M. Piva, Predictions of quantum gravity in inflationary cosmology: effects of the Weyl-squared term, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 211, 20A2 Renorm and arXiv:2005.10293 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[8]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]; BICEP/Keck XIII: Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season, arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]; BICEP/Keck Collaboration: The Latest Constraints on Inflationary B...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[9]

Krasnikov, Nonlocal gauge theories, Theor

N.V. Krasnikov, Nonlocal gauge theories, Theor. Math. Phys. 73 (1987) 1184 [Teor. Mat. Fiz. 73 (1987) 235]; Yu.V. Kuz’min, The convergent nonlocal gravitation, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 50, 1011 (1989) [Yad. Fiz. 50, 1630 (1989)]; E.T. Tomboulis, Super-renormalizable gauge and gravitational theories, arXiv:hep- th/9702146; L. Modesto, Super-renormalizable quant...

work page arXiv 1987
[10]

Pais and G.E

A. Pais and G.E. Uhlenbeck, On field theories with non-localized action, Phys. Rev. 79 (1950) 145

work page 1950
[11]

Efimov, Non-local quantum theory of the scalar field, Commun

G.V. Efimov, Non-local quantum theory of the scalar field, Commun. Math. Phys. 5 (1967) 42; G.V. Efimov, Quantization of non-local field theory, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10 (1974) 19; G.V. Efimov, Nonlocal interactions of quantized fields, Nauka, Moscow (1977)

work page 1967
[12]

Towards singularity and ghost free theories of gravity

T. Biswas, E. Gerwick, T. Koivisto and A. Mazumdar, Towards singularity and ghost free theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 031101 and arXiv:1110.5249 [gr- qc]; T. Biswas, A. Conroy, A. S. Koshelev and A. Mazumdar, Generalized ghost- free quadratic curvature gravity, Class. Quantum Grav. 31 (2014) 015022 and arXiv:1308.2319 [hep-th]; L. Buonin...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[13]

Anselmi, Quantum gravity with purely virtual particles from asymptotically local quantum field theory, Eur

D. Anselmi, Quantum gravity with purely virtual particles from asymptotically local quantum field theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) 999, 24A2 Renorm and arXiv:2410.21599 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[14]

Lee and G.C

T.D. Lee and G.C. Wick, Negative metric and the unitarity of theS-matrix, Nucl. Phys. B 9 (1969) 209; T.D. Lee and G.C. Wick, Finite theory of quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 2 (1970) 1033; T.D. Lee, Complex pole model with indefinite metric, inQuanta, P.G.O. Freund, C.J. Giebek and Y. Nambu (eds.), Chicago University Press, Chicago, U.S.A. (1970), ...

work page 1969
[15]

Unitarity of loop diagrams for the ghost-like $1/(k^2-M_1^2)-1/(k^2-M_2^2)$ propagator

M.J.G. Veltman, Unitarity and causality in a renormalizable field theory with unstable particles, Physica 29 (1963) 186; H. Yamamoto, Convergent field theory with complex masse, Prog. Theor. Phys. 42 (1969) 707; H. Yamamoto, Quantum field theory of complex mass, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44 (1970) 272; N. Nakanishi, Indefinite metric quantum field theory, Prog. ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1963
[16]

A QCD analogy for quantum gravity

B. Holdom and J. Ren, QCD analogy for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 124030 [arXiv:1512.05305]; G.P. de Brito, Quadratic gravity in analogy to quantum chromodynamics: Light fermions in its landscape, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 086005 [arXiv:2309.03838]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[17]

Mannheim, Ghost problems from Pauli–Villars to fourth-order quantum gravity and their resolution, Int

P.D. Mannheim, Ghost problems from Pauli–Villars to fourth-order quantum gravity and their resolution, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29 (2020) 2043009 [ arXiv:2004.00376]

work page arXiv 2020
[18]

Donoghue and G

J.F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, Unitarity, stability and loops of unstable ghosts, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 105006 [arXiv:1908.02416]

work page arXiv 2019
[19]

Stelle, Renormalization of higher derivative quantum gravity, Phys

K.S. Stelle, Renormalization of higher derivative quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 953

work page 1977
[20]

Russell, On the Notion of Cause, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13 (1913) 1

B. Russell, On the Notion of Cause, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13 (1913) 1

work page 1913
[21]

Anselmi and G

D. Anselmi and G. Calcagni, Classicized dynamics and initial conditions in field theories with fakeons, J. High Energy Phys. (to appear), 25A2 Renorm and arXiv:2510.05276 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[22]

P. A. M. Dirac, Gauge invariant formulation of quantum electrodynamics, Can. J. Phys. 33 (1955) 650

work page 1955
[23]

Anselmi, Quantum field theory of physical and purely virtual particles in a finite time interval on a compact space manifold: diagrams, amplitudes and unitarity, J

D. Anselmi, Quantum field theory of physical and purely virtual particles in a finite time interval on a compact space manifold: diagrams, amplitudes and unitarity, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 209, 23A1 Renorm and arXiv:2304.07642 [hep-th]; D. Anselmi, Gauge theories and quantum gravity in a finite interval of time, on a compact space manifold, Phys. R...

work page arXiv 2023
[24]

Renormalization and causality violations in classical gravity coupled with quantum matter

P.A.M. Dirac, Classical theory of radiating electrons, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 167 (1938) 148; J.D. Jackson,Classical electrodynamics, Wiley, New York, U.S.A. (1975), chap. 17; D. Anselmi, Renormalization and causality violations in classical gravity coupled with quantum matter, JHEP 07 01 (2007) 062, 06A1 Renorm and arXiv:hep-th/0605205

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1938
[25]

Hawking, Chronology Protection Conjecture, Phys

S.W. Hawking, Chronology Protection Conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 603

work page 1992
[26]

Friedman, M.S

J.R. Friedman, M.S. Morris, I.D. Novikov, K.S. Thorne and U. Yurtsever, Cauchy problem in spacetimes with closed timelike curves, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 1915

work page 1990
[27]

’t Hooft and M.J.G

G. ’t Hooft and M.J.G. Veltman,Diagrammar, CERN report CERN-73-09

work page
[28]

Bogoliubov and D.V

N.N. Bogoliubov and D.V. Shirkov,Introduction to the Theory of Quantized Fields, Interscience Publishers,1959, New York,§20

work page 1959
[29]

Lehmann, K

H. Lehmann, K. Symanzik and W. Zimmerman, Zur Formulierung quantisierter Feldtheorien, Il Nuovo Cimento 1 (1955) 205

work page 1955
[30]

Anselmi and A

D. Anselmi and A. Marino, Fakeons and microcausality: light cones, gravitational waves and the Hubble constant, Class. Quantum Gravity 37 (2020) 095003, 19A3 Renorm and arXiv:1909.12873 [gr-qc]. 34

work page arXiv 2020