arxiv: 2601.07596 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-12 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Recognition: no theorem link

Asymptotic Pad\'e Predictions up to Six Loops in QCD and Eight Loops in λφ⁴

J.A. Gracey , I. Jack , D.R.T. Jones

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 15:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th

keywords Asymptotic PadéQCD beta functionquark mass anomalous dimensionlambda phi four theoryperturbative expansionloop ordersrenormalization group

0 comments

The pith

Asymptotic Padé approximants predict six-loop QCD beta function after matching five-loop results to 1 percent.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors test their earlier Asymptotic Padé forecasts for the five-loop QCD beta function and quark mass anomalous dimension against the exact results that later appeared. They find the coefficients in the expansion in powers of the number of quark flavors N_F agreed to within one percent. The same method applied to lambda phi to the fourth theory shows accuracy improving as the loop order rises. On that basis they generate new six-loop predictions for the QCD quantities and eight-loop predictions for the O(N) scalar beta function. These forecasts matter because direct calculation of perturbative coefficients grows rapidly harder with each additional loop.

Core claim

We assess the accuracy of our previous Asymptotic Padé predictions of the five-loop QCD β-function and quark mass anomalous dimension in the light of subsequent exact results. We find the low-order coefficients in an expansion in powers of N_F were correct to within 1%. Furthermore an examination of recent results in λφ⁴ theory indicates that the Asymptotic Padé methods deliver predictions which increase in accuracy with loop order. Encouraged by this, we present six-loop Asymptotic Padé predictions for the QCD β-function and quark mass anomalous dimension, and also for the eight-loop β-function in O(N) λφ⁴ theory.

What carries the argument

Asymptotic Padé approximants, which blend ordinary Padé rational fits with the known large-order factorial growth of perturbative series coefficients to extrapolate beyond computed orders.

If this is right

Six-loop coefficients for the QCD beta function in the N_F expansion become available for use in renormalization-group analyses.
The six-loop quark-mass anomalous dimension in QCD is now estimated.
The eight-loop beta function for O(N) lambda phi four theory supplies a new benchmark for scalar field theory.
Higher-order running of couplings in QCD can be refined without waiting for full exact calculations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Once exact six-loop QCD results appear they can be used to calibrate further improvements to the approximant.
The method may be applied to other gauge theories whose perturbative series share similar large-order asymptotics.
Precision collider predictions that depend on high-order QCD running could incorporate these estimates as uncertainty bands shrink.

Load-bearing premise

The observed improvement in accuracy with rising loop order in lambda phi four theory will continue when the same method is applied at six loops in QCD.

What would settle it

An exact six-loop computation of the QCD beta-function coefficients in powers of N_F followed by direct numerical comparison with the Asymptotic Padé values.

read the original abstract

We assess the accuracy of our previous Asymptotic Pad\'e predictions of the five-loop QCD $\beta$-function and quark mass anomalous dimension in the light of subsequent exact results. We find the low-order coefficients in an expansion in powers of $N_F$ (the number of flavours) were correct to within $1\%$. Furthermore an examination of recent results in $\lambda\phi^4$ theory indicates that the Asymptotic Pad\'e methods deliver predictions which increase in accuracy with loop order. Encouraged by this, we present six-loop Asymptotic Pad\'e predictions for the QCD $\beta$-function and quark mass anomalous dimension, and also for the eight-loop $\beta$-function in $O(N)$ $\lambda\phi^4$ theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper validates its prior Asymptotic Padé predictions against exact five-loop QCD results to within 1% and extends the method to six loops in QCD plus eight loops in the scalar theory.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors' earlier Asymptotic Padé estimates for five-loop QCD held up when the exact beta function and quark mass anomalous dimension became available. The low-order coefficients in the N_f expansion matched the real results to about 1%. They also checked the method in lambda phi^4 theory and found that predictive accuracy improves as the loop order rises, which encouraged them to push forward with six-loop QCD numbers and an eight-loop scalar beta function prediction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper validates prior Asymptotic Padé predictions for the five-loop QCD β-function and quark mass anomalous dimension against exact results, finding that low-order coefficients in the N_F expansion agree to within 1%. It reports that the method's accuracy improves with loop order when tested in O(N) λφ⁴ theory and, on that basis, presents six-loop Asymptotic Padé predictions for the QCD β-function and mass anomalous dimension together with an eight-loop prediction for the β-function in λφ⁴ theory.

Significance. If the observed trend of increasing accuracy continues, the six- and eight-loop predictions supply useful benchmarks for assessing the convergence of perturbative series in QCD and scalar field theory. The direct 1% validation against exact five-loop QCD results provides a concrete check on the method at accessible orders and strengthens its utility for estimating higher-order coefficients where direct computation remains prohibitive.

major comments (1)

The central extrapolation—that the accuracy improvement seen with loop order in λφ⁴ theory will persist into the six-loop QCD regime—rests on an unverified continuation of the trend; the manuscript should supply a quantitative error band or sensitivity test for this assumption, as the gauge structure of QCD is absent in the scalar theory used for validation.

minor comments (2)

Tables or figures comparing predicted versus exact N_F coefficients should explicitly list the individual percentage errors rather than a single aggregate 1% figure.
The notation for the Asymptotic Padé approximants and the precise definition of the large-order asymptotic form should be restated in a dedicated subsection for readers unfamiliar with the prior work.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and the recommendation for minor revision. Below we provide a point-by-point response to the major comment.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central extrapolation—that the accuracy improvement seen with loop order in λφ⁴ theory will persist into the six-loop QCD regime—rests on an unverified continuation of the trend; the manuscript should supply a quantitative error band or sensitivity test for this assumption, as the gauge structure of QCD is absent in the scalar theory used for validation.

Authors: We thank the referee for this insightful comment. The validation against the exact five-loop QCD results already occurs in the full gauge theory, demonstrating that the Asymptotic Padé approximants achieve 1% accuracy for the relevant coefficients even in the presence of gauge interactions. The additional evidence from the O(N) λφ⁴ theory shows that the accuracy of these predictions improves as the loop order increases. This trend, combined with the direct QCD validation at five loops, underpins our confidence that the six-loop predictions will be at least as reliable. We acknowledge, however, that providing a quantitative error band or sensitivity test would further strengthen the manuscript. In the revised version, we will add a section discussing the sensitivity of the predictions to the choice of Padé parameters and include comparisons that quantify the expected improvement based on the observed trend in the scalar theory. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the Asymptotic Padé prediction chain

full rationale

The paper validates its prior Asymptotic Padé predictions for five-loop QCD quantities against subsequently obtained exact results, reporting 1% accuracy on low-order N_F coefficients, and separately observes that the same method's accuracy improves with loop order when tested on known results in λφ⁴ theory. The six-loop QCD and eight-loop λφ⁴ predictions are then generated by applying the identical fitting procedure to the already-known lower-order coefficients. This is a standard extrapolation technique whose inputs (lower-order terms) are independent of the outputs (higher-order estimates); no equation reduces to itself by construction, no parameter is fitted to a subset and then renamed as a prediction of a closely related quantity within the same dataset, and the central claim does not rest on a self-citation chain that itself lacks external verification. The assumption that the observed accuracy trend continues is an empirical extrapolation, not a definitional equivalence. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the asymptotic large-order form assumed for the perturbative series and on parameters fitted to lower-order known coefficients; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

Padé approximant parameters
Numerical coefficients in the rational function chosen to match the known low-order terms and the assumed large-order growth.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The perturbative series for the beta function and anomalous dimensions possess a known asymptotic large-order behavior that can be captured by a Padé approximant.
Invoked throughout the construction of the approximants in sections describing the method.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5433 in / 1287 out tokens · 26575 ms · 2026-05-16T15:17:35.283774+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

[1]

Estimating perturbative coefficients in quantum field theory using Pad´ e approximants,

M. A. Samuel, G. Li and E. Steinfelds, “Estimating perturbative coefficients in quantum field theory using Pad´ e approximants,” Phys. Rev. D48(1993), 869-872; “Estimating perturbative coefficients in quantum field theory using Pad´ e approxi- mants. 2.,” Phys. Lett. B323(1994), 188

work page 1993
[2]

Estimating perturbative coefficients in high-energy physics and condensed matter theory,

M. A. Samuel and G. Li, “Estimating perturbative coefficients in high-energy physics and condensed matter theory,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.33(1994), 1461-1470; “Estimating perturbative coefficients in quantum field theory and the orthopositron- ium decay rate discrepancy,” Phys. Lett. B331(1994), 114

work page 1994
[3]

Pad´ e improvement of beta function in perturbativeλϕ4 and QED,

J. F. Yang and G. J. Ni, “Pad´ e improvement of beta function in perturbativeλϕ4 and QED,” Commun. Theor. Phys.22(1994), 207

work page 1994
[4]

The Anomalous Magnetic Moments of the Electron and the Muon - Improved QED Predictions Using Pade Approximants

J. R. Ellis, M. Karliner, M. A. Samuel and E. Steinfelds, “The anomalous magnetic moments of the electron and the muon: Improved QED predictions using Pad´ e ap- proximants,” [arXiv:hep-ph/9409376 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[5]

Comparison of the Pade Approximation Method to Perturbative QCD Calculations

M. A. Samuel, J. R. Ellis and M. Karliner, “Comparison of the Pad´ e approxima- tion method to perturbative QCD calculations,” Phys. Rev. Lett.74(1995), 4380 [arXiv:hep-ph/9503411 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[6]

Pade Approximants, Borel Transforms and Renormalons: the Bjorken Sum Rule as a Case Study

J. R. Ellis, E. Gardi, M. Karliner and M. A. Samuel, “Pad´ e approximants, Borel transforms and renormalons: The Bjorken sum rule as a case study,” Phys. Lett. B 366(1996), 268 [arXiv:hep-ph/9509312 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[7]

Renormalization scheme de- pendence of Pad´ e summation in QCD,

J. R. Ellis, E. Gardi, M. Karliner and M. A. Samuel, “Renormalization scheme de- pendence of Pad´ e summation in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D54(1996), 6986 [arXiv:hep- ph/9607404 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 1996
[8]

Perturbative Finite-Temperature Results and Pad'e Approximants

B. M. Kastening, “Perturbative finite temperature results and Pad´ e approximants,” Phys. Rev. D56(1997), 8107 [arXiv:hep-ph/9708219 [hep-ph]]. 43

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[9]

Foam Diagram Summation at Finite Temperature

I. T. Drummond, R. R. Horgan, P. V. Landshoff and A. Rebhan, “Foam diagram sum- mation at finite temperature,” Nucl. Phys. B524(1998), 579 [arXiv:hep-ph/9708426 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[10]

Why Pad\'e Approximants reduce the Renormalization-Scale dependence in QFT?

E. Gardi, “Why Pad´ e approximants reduce the renormalization scale dependence in QFT?,” Phys. Rev. D56(1997), 68 [arXiv:hep-ph/9611453 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[11]

Pade Approximants, Optimal Renormalization Scales, and Momentum Flow in Feynman Diagrams

S. J. Brodsky, J. R. Ellis, E. Gardi, M. Karliner and M. A. Samuel, “Pad´ e approxi- mants, optimal renormalization scales, and momentum flow in Feynman diagrams,” Phys. Rev. D56(1997), 6980 [arXiv:hep-ph/9706467 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[12]

A Prediction for the 4-Loop \beta Function

J. R. Ellis, M. Karliner and M. A. Samuel, “A prediction for the four-loopβ-function in QCD,” Phys. Lett. B400(1997), 176 [arXiv:hep-ph/9612202 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[13]

Pade-Improvement of QCD Running Coupling Constants, Running Masses, Higgs Decay Rates, and Scalar Channel Sum Rules

V. Elias, T. G. Steele, F. Chishtie, R. Migneron and K. B. Sprague, “Pad´ e improve- ment of QCD running coupling constants, running masses, Higgs decay rates, and scalar channel sum rules,” Phys. Rev. D58(1998), 116007 [arXiv:hep-ph/9806324 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[14]

Asymptotic Pade-Approximant Predictions for Renormalization-Group Functions of Massive $\phi^4$ Scalar Field Theory

F. Chishtie, V. Elias and T. G. Steele, “Asymptotic Pad´ e approximant predictions for renormalization group functions of massiveϕ 4 scalar field theory,” Phys. Lett. B446 (1999), 267 [arXiv:hep-ph/9809538 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[15]

Asymptotic Pad\'e Approximants and the SQCD $\beta$-function

I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones and M. A. Samuel, “Asymptotic Pad´ e approximants and the SQCDβ-function,” Phys. Lett. B407(1997), 143 [arXiv:hep-ph/9706249 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[16]

Asymptotic Pade Approximant Predictions: up to Five Loops in QCD and SQCD

J. R. Ellis, I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, M. Karliner and M. A. Samuel, “Asymptotic Pad´ e approximant predictions: Up to five loops in QCD and SQCD,” Phys. Rev. D57 (1998), 2665 [arXiv:hep-ph/9710302 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[17]

RG/Pade Estimate of the Three-Loop Contribution to the QCD Static Potential Function

F. A. Chishtie and V. Elias, “RG / Pad´ e estimate of the three loop contribution to the QCD static potential function,” Phys. Lett. B521(2001), 434 [arXiv:hep-ph/0107052 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[18]

QCD static energy using optimal renormalization and asymptotic Pad´ e-approximant methods,

B. Ananthanarayan, D. Das and M. S. A. Alam Khan, “QCD static energy using optimal renormalization and asymptotic Pad´ e-approximant methods,” Phys. Rev. D 102(2020) no.7, 076008 [arXiv:2007.10775 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2020
[19]

Minimally subtracted six loop renormalization of $O(n)$-symmetric $\phi^4$ theory and critical exponents

M. V. Kompaniets and E. Panzer, “Minimally subtracted six-loop renormalization ofO(n)-symmetricϕ 4 theory and critical exponents,” Phys. Rev. D96(2017) no.3, 036016 [arXiv:1705.06483 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[20]

Five-Loop Running of the QCD coupling constant

P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin and J. H. K¨ uhn, “Five-loop running of the QCD coupling constant,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) no.8, 082002 [arXiv:1606.08659 [hep- ph]]. 44

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[21]

Quark Mass and Field Anomalous Dimensions to ${\cal O}(\alpha_s^5)$

P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin and J. H. K¨ uhn, “Quark mass and field anomalous dimensions toO(α 5 s),” JHEP10(2014), 076 [arXiv:1402.6611 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[22]

The four-loop beta-function in Quantum Chromodynamics

T. van Ritbergen, J. A. M. Vermaseren and S. A. Larin, “The four-loopβ-function in quantum chromodynamics,” Phys. Lett. B400(1997), 379 [arXiv:hep-ph/9701390 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[23]

Towards the five-loop Beta function for a general gauge group

T. Luthe, A. Maier, P. Marquard and Y. Schr¨ oder, “Towards the five-loopβ-function for a general gauge group,” JHEP07(2016), 127 [arXiv:1606.08662 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[24]

The five-loop beta function of Yang-Mills theory with fermions

F. Herzog, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, “The five-loopβ- function of Yang-Mills theory with fermions,” JHEP02(2017), 090 [arXiv:1701.01404 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[25]

Complete renormalization of QCD at five loops

T. Luthe, A. Maier, P. Marquard and Y. Schroder, “Complete renormalization of QCD at five loops,” JHEP03(2017), 020 [arXiv:1701.07068 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[26]

Five-loop quark mass and field anomalous dimensions for a general gauge group

T. Luthe, A. Maier, P. Marquard and Y. Schr¨ oder, “Five-loop quark mass and field anomalous dimensions for a general gauge group,” JHEP01(2017), 081 [arXiv:1612.05512 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[27]

Quark Mass Anomalous Dimension to alpha_s**4

K. G. Chetyrkin, “Quark mass anomalous dimension toO(α 4 s),” Phys. Lett. B404 (1997), 161 [arXiv:hep-ph/9703278 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[28]

The 4-loop quark mass anomalous dimension and the invariant quark mass

J. A. M. Vermaseren, S. A. Larin and T. van Ritbergen, “The four-loop quark mass anomalous dimension and the invariant quark mass,” Phys. Lett. B405(1997), 327 [arXiv:hep-ph/9703284 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[29]

Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, “Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.30(1973), 1343-1346

work page 1973
[30]

Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?,

H. D. Politzer, “Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?,” Phys. Rev. Lett.30(1973), 1346-1349

work page 1973
[31]

Two Loop Diagrams in Yang-Mills Theory,

D. R. T. Jones, “Two Loop Diagrams in Yang-Mills Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B75(1974), 531

work page 1974
[32]

Asymptotic Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories to Two Loop Order,

W. E. Caswell, “Asymptotic Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories to Two Loop Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.33(1974), 244

work page 1974
[33]

The Gell-Mann-Low Function of QCD in the Three Loop Approximation,

O. V. Tarasov, A. A. Vladimirov and A. Y. Zharkov, “The Gell-Mann-Low Function of QCD in the Three Loop Approximation,” Phys. Lett. B93(1980), 429

work page 1980
[34]

Scheme dependence and the NSVZ $\beta$-function

I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones and C. G. North, “Scheme dependence and the NSVZβ- function,” Nucl. Phys. B486(1997), 479 [arXiv:hep-ph/9609325 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[35]

The connection between the DRED and NSVZ renormalisation schemes

I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones and A. Pickering, “The connection between DRED and NSVZ,” Phys. Lett. B435(1998), 61 [arXiv:hep-ph/9805482 [hep-ph]]. 45

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[36]

Theβ-function for effective quark masses to two loops in QCD

O. Nachtmann and W. Wetzel, “Theβ-function for effective quark masses to two loops in QCD” Nucl. Phys. B187(1981), 333

work page 1981
[37]

The pole mass in perturbative QCD

R. Tarrach, “The pole mass in perturbative QCD” Nucl. Phys. B183(1981), 384

work page 1981
[38]

Anomalous dimensions of quark masses in the three-loop approxima- tion,

O. V. Tarasov, “Anomalous dimensions of quark masses in the three-loop approxima- tion,” Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett.17(2020) no.2, 109-115 [arXiv:1910.12231 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2020
[39]

The QCD beta-function at O(1/N_f)

J. A. Gracey, “The QCDβ-function atO(1/N f),” Phys. Lett. B373(1996), 178 [arXiv:hep-ph/9602214 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[40]

The 1/N f expansion of theγandβ-functions in QED,

A. Palanques-Mestre and P. Pascual, “The 1/N f expansion of theγandβ-functions in QED,” Commun. Math. Phys.95(1984), 277

work page 1984
[41]

Quark mass anoma- lous dimension atO(1/N 2 f ) in QCD,

M. Ciuchini, S. E. Derkachov, J. A. Gracey and A. N. Manashov, “Quark mass anoma- lous dimension atO(1/N 2 f ) in QCD,” Phys. Lett. B458(1999), 117 [arXiv:hep- ph/9903410 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 1999
[42]

Computation of quark mass anomalous dimension at O(1/N_f^2) in quantum chromodynamics

M. Ciuchini, S. E. Derkachov, J. A. Gracey and A. N. Manashov, “Computation of quark mass anomalous dimension atO(1/N 2 f ) in quantum chromodynamics,” Nucl. Phys. B579(2000), 56 [arXiv:hep-ph/9912221 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[43]

Higher order contributions to critical exponents

E. Br´ ezin, J.C. Le Guillou, J. Zinn-Justin and B.G. Nickel, “Higher order contributions to critical exponents”, Phys. Lett. A44(1973), 227

work page 1973
[44]

Calculation of critical exponents by quantum field theory methods,

D. I. Kazakov, O. V. Tarasov and A. A. Vladimirov, “Calculation of critical exponents by quantum field theory methods,” Sov. Phys. JETP50(1979), 521 JINR-E2-12249

work page 1979
[45]

Four-loop approximation in theϕ 4 model

F.M. Dittes, Yu.A. Kubyshin and O.V. Tarasov, “Four-loop approximation in theϕ 4 model”, Theor. Math. Phys.37(1978), 879

work page 1978
[46]

Five-loop calculations in thegϕ 4 Model and the critical indexη,

K. G. Chetyrkin, A. L. Kataev and F. V. Tkachov, “Five-loop calculations in thegϕ 4 Model and the critical indexη,” Phys. Lett. B99(1981), 147 [erratum: Phys. Lett. B101(1981), 457]

work page 1981
[47]

Five-loop renor- malization group calculations in thegϕ 4 in four-dimensions theory,

S. G. Gorishnii, S. A. Larin, F. V. Tkachov and K. G. Chetyrkin, “Five-loop renor- malization group calculations in thegϕ 4 in four-dimensions theory,” Phys. Lett. B 132(1983), 351

work page 1983
[48]

Five-loop renormalization group functions of ${O}(n)$-symmetric $\phi^4$-theory and $\ep$-expansions of critical exponents up to $\ep^5$

H. Kleinert, J. Neu, V. Schulte-Frohlinde, K. G. Chetyrkin and S. A. Larin, “Five- loop renormalization group functions ofO(n) symmetricϕ 4 theory andϵexpansions of critical exponents up toϵ 5,” Phys. Lett. B272(1991), 39 [erratum: Phys. Lett. B 319(1993), 545] [arXiv:hep-th/9503230 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1991
[49]

Numbers and Functions in Quantum Field Theory

O. Schnetz, “Numbers and functions in quantum field theory,” Phys. Rev. D97(2018) no.8, 085018 [arXiv:1606.08598 [hep-th]]. 46

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[50]

Beyond the triangle and uniqueness relations: non-zeta counterterms at large N from positive knots

D.J. Broadhurst, J.A. Gracey and D. Kreimer, “Beyond the triangle and uniqueness relations: non-zeta counterterms at largeNfrom positive knots” Z. Physik C75 (1997), 559 [arXiv:hep-th/9607174 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[51]

Progress with large N_f beta-functions

J. A. Gracey, “Progress with largeN f β-functions,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A389 (1997), 361-364 [arXiv:hep-ph/9609409 [hep-ph]]. 47

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997