pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.07719 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · math-ph· math.MP· physics.chem-ph

Geometric theory of constrained Schr\"odinger dynamics with application to time-dependent density-functional theory on a finite lattice

Eric Canc\`es , Th\'eo Duez , Jari van Gog , Asbj{\o}rn B{\ae}kgaard Lauritsen , Mathieu Lewin , Julien Toulouse This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 15:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci math-phmath.MPphysics.chem-ph
keywords constrained Schrödinger dynamicstime-dependent density-functional theoryfinite latticegeometric frameworkKohn-Sham schemeimaginary potentialHubbard dimer
0
0 comments X

The pith

Constrained Schrödinger dynamics on the quantum state manifold admits multiple geometric definitions, yielding both conventional TDDFT and a new alternative evolution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a geometric framework for Schrödinger evolution in which certain observables are required to maintain fixed expectation values. It demonstrates that the familiar TDDFT equations arise when the action functional is made stationary, but a purely geometric construction on the manifold produces a distinct form of constrained dynamics. This alternative has not been studied before and may give a firmer mathematical basis for TDDFT while suggesting fresh routes to nonadiabatic approximations. When applied to interacting fermions on finite lattices the framework produces new Kohn-Sham schemes that enforce the density constraint through an imaginary potential or an equivalent nonlocal Hermitian operator. Numerical tests on the Hubbard dimer illustrate how these schemes behave in practice.

Core claim

The manifold of states with prescribed expectation values supports several natural notions of constrained dynamics. The standard TDDFT evolution is recovered by imposing stationarity of the action, whereas a purely geometric projection onto the allowed tangent directions produces an inequivalent flow that can be realized by augmenting the Hamiltonian with an imaginary potential to keep the density fixed.

What carries the argument

The geometry of the finite-dimensional state manifold, which determines distinct projections that keep selected expectation values constant while evolving the state vector.

If this is right

  • New Kohn-Sham schemes for lattice TDDFT in which the density constraint is enforced by an imaginary potential.
  • The alternative geometric dynamics offers a route to TDDFT that may avoid certain mathematical difficulties of the conventional action-based formulation.
  • The same geometric construction can be used to derive constrained schemes for other observables beyond the density.
  • Numerical illustrations on the Hubbard dimer already show how the new schemes differ from standard TDDFT in their time evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could be lifted from finite lattices to continuous or periodic systems to check whether the alternative dynamics remains stable or converges to known limits.
  • It may connect to other geometric formulations of quantum dynamics that appear in open-system or non-Hermitian settings.
  • Direct comparison of the two dynamics on small exact-solvable models could quantify which one better reproduces exact nonadiabatic transitions.

Load-bearing premise

The geometry of the state manifold itself supplies a physically preferred constrained dynamics that does not require the action principle.

What would settle it

Numerical integration of the alternative geometric dynamics on the Hubbard dimer for a chosen initial state and fixed density, followed by direct comparison of its time-dependent observables against the exact many-body Schrödinger evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.07719 by Asbj{\o}rn B{\ae}kgaard Lauritsen, Eric Canc\`es, Jari van Gog, Julien Toulouse, Mathieu Lewin, Th\'eo Duez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. In the variational principle, an optimal trajectory [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. In the geometric principle, an optimal trajectory [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The oblique principle continuously interpolates be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Bloch sphere representation of the states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Let us now discuss time-dependent v-representability within the variational principle. We give ourselves a func￾tion 0 ⩽ ρ1(t) ⩽ 1 and work under the constraint ⟨ψ(t), O1ψ(t)⟩ = |ψ1(t)| 2 = ρ1(t). Then we will automatically get |ψ2(t)| 2 = 1 − |ψ1(t)| 2 = 1 − ρ1(t) =: ρ2(t). As we said above, we assume 0 < ρ1(t) < 1. Next we ask what kind of functions ρ1(t) can be attained with the dynamics given by the va… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Top panel: time evolution in logarithmic scale of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Symmetric Hubbard dimer ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Asymmetric Hubbard dimer ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Let us for instance explain this phenomenon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT) is a central tool for studying the dynamical electronic structure of molecules and solids, yet aspects of its mathematical foundations remain insufficiently understood. In this work, we revisit the foundations of TDDFT within a finite-dimensional setting by developing a general geometric framework for Schr\"odinger dynamics subject to prescribed expectation values of selected observables. We show that multiple natural definitions of such constrained dynamics arise from the underlying geometry of the state manifold. The conventional TDDFT formulation emerges from demanding stationarity of the action functional, while an alternative, purely geometric construction leads to a distinct form of constrained Schr\"odinger evolution that has not been previously explored. This alternative dynamics may provide a more mathematically robust route to TDDFT and may suggest new strategies for constructing nonadiabatic approximations. Applying the theory to interacting fermions on finite lattices, we derive novel Kohn--Sham schemes in which the density constraint is enforced via an imaginary potential or, equivalently, a nonlocal Hermitian operator. Numerical illustrations for the Hubbard dimer demonstrate the behavior of these new approaches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a geometric framework for Schrödinger dynamics constrained to fixed expectation values of selected observables on finite-dimensional state manifolds (projective space with Fubini-Study metric). It argues that multiple natural definitions of such dynamics arise from the manifold geometry: the conventional TDDFT formulation is recovered by stationarity of the action functional, while an alternative, purely geometric construction (via a specific choice of horizontal distribution on the constraint subbundle) yields a distinct constrained evolution. This is applied to interacting fermions on finite lattices to derive novel Kohn-Sham schemes enforcing density constraints via an imaginary potential (or equivalent nonlocal Hermitian operator), with numerical illustrations on the Hubbard dimer.

Significance. If the alternative geometric dynamics is shown to be canonically distinct, robust, and independent of the action principle, the work could strengthen the mathematical foundations of TDDFT and suggest new nonadiabatic approximation strategies, especially for lattice models where standard variational approaches encounter difficulties. The provision of explicit Kohn-Sham schemes and Hubbard-dimer illustrations is a concrete strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3: The alternative dynamics is obtained by selecting a particular orthogonal complement to the vertical directions generated by the constraint generators. This choice is equivalent to fixing a connection on the constraint subbundle whose curvature is not determined solely by the Kähler structure of the state manifold. Different choices of complement recover the standard variational TDDFT or other flows, so the construction is not unique without an additional selection rule whose physical motivation is not supplied by the manifold geometry alone.
  2. [§4] §4 (lattice application): The freedom to add any operator commuting with the density constraints is parametrized via the imaginary potential, but the manuscript does not demonstrate that this is the only (or the geometrically preferred) choice among the family of possible horizontal distributions. This directly affects whether the resulting Kohn-Sham scheme is uniquely determined by the geometric framework.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction should explicitly state the precise sense in which the geometric construction is claimed to be 'independent' of the action principle, given that both ultimately operate on the same constrained manifold.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We appreciate the positive evaluation of the potential significance of the geometric framework and its application to lattice TDDFT. Below we respond point by point to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3: The alternative dynamics is obtained by selecting a particular orthogonal complement to the vertical directions generated by the constraint generators. This choice is equivalent to fixing a connection on the constraint subbundle whose curvature is not determined solely by the Kähler structure of the state manifold. Different choices of complement recover the standard variational TDDFT or other flows, so the construction is not unique without an additional selection rule whose physical motivation is not supplied by the manifold geometry alone.

    Authors: We agree that multiple horizontal distributions are mathematically possible on the constraint subbundle. Our construction selects the specific orthogonal complement with respect to the Fubini-Study metric that is compatible with the symplectic structure of the projective space while remaining independent of any action principle. This yields a canonical alternative to the variational dynamics whose curvature is fixed by the chosen orthogonality. We will revise §3 to state this selection rule explicitly, derive its curvature properties from the Kähler geometry, and clarify how it differs from other complements (including the variational one). revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (lattice application): The freedom to add any operator commuting with the density constraints is parametrized via the imaginary potential, but the manuscript does not demonstrate that this is the only (or the geometrically preferred) choice among the family of possible horizontal distributions. This directly affects whether the resulting Kohn-Sham scheme is uniquely determined by the geometric framework.

    Authors: In the lattice setting the imaginary potential (equivalently, the nonlocal Hermitian operator) is the operator that realizes the horizontal lift defined by the orthogonal complement of §3 while preserving the local character of the density constraint. We acknowledge that other commuting operators could be added in principle, but they would violate the orthogonality condition or introduce extraneous nonlocality. We will expand §4 to derive this preference explicitly from the geometric construction, compare it briefly to other possible lifts, and thereby establish that the resulting Kohn-Sham scheme is the one uniquely selected by the framework. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation distinguishes action-based TDDFT from independent geometric flow on the constraint subbundle

full rationale

The paper explicitly states that multiple natural definitions of constrained dynamics arise from the state manifold geometry, with the conventional TDDFT recovered from stationarity of the action functional and the alternative construction presented as a distinct, purely geometric choice. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported via self-citation, and the lattice Kohn-Sham schemes follow directly from enforcing density constraints through the selected horizontal distribution without redefining the target quantities. The framework is self-contained against the Kähler structure and constraint generators, with the non-uniqueness of horizontal complements acknowledged rather than smuggled in as canonical.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the geometric structure of the quantum state manifold and the distinction between action-stationarity and purely geometric constraints; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The state manifold possesses a natural geometry that defines multiple distinct notions of constrained dynamics
    Invoked as the source of both conventional and alternative dynamics

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5531 in / 1194 out tokens · 36012 ms · 2026-05-16T15:09:11.312843+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Geometric Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Geometric TDDFT reformulates the theory on the manifold of fixed-density states, producing a hydrodynamics equation for orbital-free TDDFT and a non-local operator for the Kohn-Sham version.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The first part is becauseγandγ ′ have the same density and the second is because they have the same spectrum

    = Tr(γ1) = 2KX k=1 λk(γ) = 2KX k=1 λk(γ′). The first part is becauseγandγ ′ have the same density and the second is because they have the same spectrum. Next we use the variational characterization of the sum of the lowest eigenvalues, which is nothing but the Aufbau principle for fermions. We denote byP:=1(γ ′ ⩽λ 2K) the spectral projection corresponding...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Similarly, we callλ 2 andλ ′ 2 the lowest and largest eigenvalues ofγ 2, with eigenvec- torsφ 2 andφ ′

    work page

  3. [3]

    It is perfectly possible thatλ 1 =λ ′ 1 in case of degeneracy

    We thus haveλ 1 < λ ′ 2 andλ ′ 1 < λ 2. It is perfectly possible thatλ 1 =λ ′ 1 in case of degeneracy. We can always assume thatφ 1 andφ ′ 1 are orthogonal, even whenK= 1, thanks to the spin. Similarly forφ 2 andφ ′

    work page

  4. [4]

    By doing so we insert non-zero terms outside of the blocks, as needed to make the matrix irreducible

    Next we apply two rotations, replacing (φ1, φ′ 2)7→(cosθ 1φ1 + sinθ 1φ′ 2,−sinθ 1φ1 + cosθ 1φ′ 2) and (φ′ 1, φ2)7→(cosθ 2φ′ 1 + sinθ 2φ2,−sinθ 2φ′ 1 + cosθ 2φ2). By doing so we insert non-zero terms outside of the blocks, as needed to make the matrix irreducible. We obtain a new matrixγ ′′ whose diagonal blocks are γ′′ 1 =γ 1 + (λ′ 2 −λ 1) sin2 θ1 |φ1⟩⟨φ1...

    work page

  5. [5]

    To conclude this appendix, we extract a result dealing specifically with projections

    Putting every- thing together, we have constructed the desired unitary matrix. To conclude this appendix, we extract a result dealing specifically with projections. Theorem 10(Perturbing non-irreducible projections). Letγbe a one-particle rank-Nprojection that does not act irreducibly. We assume that0< ρ γ <2everywhere. Then, for anyε >0we can find a unit...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev.136, B864 (1964)

    work page 1964

  7. [7]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-Consistent Equations In- cluding Exchange and Correlation Effects, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)

    work page 1965

  8. [8]

    Runge and E

    E. Runge and E. K. U. Gross, Density-functional the- ory for time-dependent systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 997 (1984)

    work page 1984

  9. [9]

    van Leeuwen, Mapping from densities to potentials in time-dependent density-functional theory, Phys

    R. van Leeuwen, Mapping from densities to potentials in time-dependent density-functional theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3863 (1999)

    work page 1999

  10. [10]

    E. H. Lieb, Density functionals for Coulomb systems, Int. J. Quantum Chem.24, 243 (1983)

    work page 1983

  11. [11]

    N. T. Maitra, T. N. Todorov, C. Woodward, and K. Burke, Density-potential mapping in time-dependent density-functional theory, Phys. Rev. A81, 042525 (2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Z.-h. Yang, N. T. Maitra, and K. Burke, Effect of cusps in time-dependent quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 063003 (2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    Fournais, J

    S. Fournais, J. Lampart, M. Lewin, and T. Østergaard Sørensen, Coulomb potentials and Taylor expansions in Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory, Phys. Rev. A93, 062510 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Farzanehpour and I

    M. Farzanehpour and I. V. Tokatly, Time-dependent den- sity functional theory on a lattice, Phys. Rev. B86, 125130 (2012)

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Ruggenthaler, M

    M. Ruggenthaler, M. Penz, and D. Bauer, On the ex- 34 istence of effective potentials in time-dependent density functional theory, J. Phys. A, Math. Gen.42, 425207 (2009)

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Ruggenthaler and R

    M. Ruggenthaler and R. van Leeuwen, Global fixed-point proof of time-dependent density-functional theory, EPL (Europhysics Letters)95, 13001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Penz and M

    M. Penz and M. Ruggenthaler, Domains of time- dependent density-potential mappings, J. Phys. A, Math. Gen.44, 335208 (2011)

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Ruggenthaler, K

    M. Ruggenthaler, K. J. H. Giesbertz, M. Penz, and R. van Leeuwen, Density-potential mappings in quantum dy- namics, Phys. Rev. A85, 052504 (2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Ruggenthaler, M

    M. Ruggenthaler, M. Penz, and R. van Leeuwen, Ex- istence, uniqueness, and construction of the density- potential mapping in time-dependent density-functional theory, J. Phys. Condens. Matter27, 203202 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Lacombe and N

    L. Lacombe and N. T. Maitra, Non-adiabatic ap- proximations in time-dependent density functional the- ory: progress and prospects, npj Comput. Mater.9, 10.1038/s41524-023-01061-0 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-023-01061-0 2023

  21. [21]

    Geometric Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory

    ´E. Canc` es, T. Duez, J. van Gog, A. B. Lauritsen, M. Lewin, and J. Toulouse, Geometric Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory, ArXiv e-prints (2026), arXiv:2601.07724

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    Sch¨ onhammer, O

    K. Sch¨ onhammer, O. Gunnarsson, and R. M. Noack, Density-functional theory on a lattice: Comparison with exact numerical results for a model with strongly corre- lated electrons, Phys. Rev. B52, 2504 (1995)

    work page 1995

  23. [23]

    L. Xu, J. Mao, X. Gao, and Z. Liu, Extensibility of hohen- berg–kohn theorem to general quantum systems, Adv. Quantum Technol.5, 10.1002/qute.202200041 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.202200041 2022

  24. [24]

    Song, Quantum geometry of expectation values, Phys

    C. Song, Quantum geometry of expectation values, Phys. Rev. A107, 062207 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Penz and R

    M. Penz and R. van Leeuwen, Constrained search in imaginary time, Phys. Rev. A119, 032815 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Boumal,An introduction to optimization on smooth manifolds(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2023)

    N. Boumal,An introduction to optimization on smooth manifolds(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    J. M. Lee,Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer New York, 2012)

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    Penz \ and\ author R

    M. Penz and R. van Leeuwen, Density-functional the- ory on graphs, J. Chem. Phys.155, 10.1063/5.0074249 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0074249 2021

  29. [29]

    P. A. M. Dirac,The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford, at the Clarendon Press,, 1930) pp. xii+311, 3d ed (1947)

    work page 1930

  30. [30]

    Frenkel,Wave Mechanics; Advanced General Theory (Oxford University Press, 1934)

    J. Frenkel,Wave Mechanics; Advanced General Theory (Oxford University Press, 1934)

    work page 1934

  31. [31]

    Meyer, J

    H.-D. Meyer, J. Kuˇ car, and L. S. Cederbaum, Time- dependent rotated Hartree: Formal development, J. Math. Phys.29, 1417 (1988)

    work page 1988

  32. [32]

    Broeckhove, L

    J. Broeckhove, L. Lathouwers, E. Kesteloot, and P. Van Leuven, On the equivalence of time-dependent variational principles, Chem. Phys. Lett.149, 547 (1988)

    work page 1988

  33. [33]

    Raab, On the Dirac–Frenkel/McLachlan variational principle, Chem

    A. Raab, On the Dirac–Frenkel/McLachlan variational principle, Chem. Phys. Lett.319, 674 (2000)

    work page 2000

  34. [34]

    Vanderstraeten, J

    L. Hackl, T. Guaita, T. Shi, J. Haegeman, E. Demler, and I. Cirac, Geometry of variational methods: dynamics of closed quantum systems, SciPost Phys.9, 10.21468/sci- postphys.9.4.048 (2020)

    work page doi:10.21468/sci- 2020

  35. [35]

    Martinazzo and I

    R. Martinazzo and I. Burghardt, Local-in-Time Error in Variational Quantum Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 150601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Lasser and C

    C. Lasser and C. Su, Various variational approxi- mations of quantum dynamics, J. Math. Phys.63, 10.1063/5.0088265 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0088265 2022

  37. [37]

    Kramer and M

    P. Kramer and M. Saraceno,Geometry of the Time- Dependent Variational Principle in Quantum Mechanics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1981)

    work page 1981

  38. [38]

    van Leeuwen, Causality and symmetry in time- dependent density-functional theory, Phys

    R. van Leeuwen, Causality and symmetry in time- dependent density-functional theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1280 (1998)

    work page 1998

  39. [39]

    Vignale, Real-time resolution of the causality paradox of time-dependent density-functional theory, Phys

    G. Vignale, Real-time resolution of the causality paradox of time-dependent density-functional theory, Phys. Rev. A77, 062511 (2008)

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    D. J. Rowe, A. Ryman, and G. Rosensteel, Many-body quantum mechanics as a symplectic dynamical system, Phys. Rev. A22, 2362 (1980)

    work page 1980

  41. [41]

    McLachlan, A variational solution of the time- dependent Schr¨ odinger equation, Mol

    A. McLachlan, A variational solution of the time- dependent Schr¨ odinger equation, Mol. Phys.8, 39 (1964)

    work page 1964

  42. [42]

    C. Lubich,From quantum to classical molecular dynam- ics: reduced models and numerical analysis, Zurich Lec- tures in Advanced Mathematics (European Mathemati- cal Society (EMS), Z¨ urich, 2008) pp. x+144

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    V. U. Nazarov, Time-dependent variational principle and self-consistent field equations, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.98, 373 (1985)

    work page 1985

  44. [44]

    V. U. Nazarov and V. M. Silkin, Exchange kernelf h x (q, ω) of electron liquid from the variational principle of mclach- lan, Phys. Rev. B110, 104310 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    L¨ owdin and P

    P.-O. L¨ owdin and P. Mukherjee, Some comments on the time-dependent variation principle, Chem. Phys. Lett. 14, 1 (1972)

    work page 1972

  46. [46]

    U. V. Riss and H. D. Meyer, Calculation of resonance en- ergies and widths using the complex absorbing potential method, J. Phys. B26, 4503 (1993)

    work page 1993

  47. [47]

    Santra and L

    R. Santra and L. S. Cederbaum, Non-hermitian electronic theory and applications to clusters, Phys. Rep.368, 1 (2002)

    work page 2002

  48. [48]

    Ernzerhof, Density functional theory of complex tran- sition densities, J

    M. Ernzerhof, Density functional theory of complex tran- sition densities, J. Chem. Phys.125, 10.1063/1.2348880 (2006)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2348880 2006

  49. [49]

    Zhou and M

    Y. Zhou and M. Ernzerhof, Open-system Kohn-Sham density functional theory, J. Chem. Phys.136, 094105 (2012)

    work page 2012

  50. [50]

    Gebauer and R

    R. Gebauer and R. Car, Current in Open Quantum Sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 160404 (2004)

    work page 2004

  51. [51]

    Yuen-Zhou, C

    J. Yuen-Zhou, C. Rodr´ ıguez-Rosario, and A. Aspuru- Guzik, Time-dependent current-density functional the- ory for generalized open quantum systems, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.11, 4509 (2009)

    work page 2009

  52. [52]

    D’Agosta and M

    R. D’Agosta and M. Di Ventra, Foundations of stochas- tic time-dependent current-density functional theory for open quantum systems: Potential pitfalls and rigorous results, Phys. Rev. B87, 155129 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    Baer, On the mapping of time-dependent densities onto potentials in quantum mechanics, J

    R. Baer, On the mapping of time-dependent densities onto potentials in quantum mechanics, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 10.1063/1.2822124 (2008)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2822124 2008

  54. [54]

    Li and C

    Y. Li and C. A. Ullrich, Time-dependent V- representability on lattice systems, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 10.1063/1.2955733 (2008)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2955733 2008

  55. [55]

    Verdozzi, Time-Dependent Density-Functional The- ory and Strongly Correlated Systems: Insight from Nu- merical Studies, Phys

    C. Verdozzi, Time-Dependent Density-Functional The- ory and Strongly Correlated Systems: Insight from Nu- merical Studies, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 166401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  56. [56]

    S. T. Epstein and C. M. Rosenthal, The Hohen- berg–Kohn theorem, J. Chem. Phys.64, 247 (1976). 35

    work page 1976

  57. [57]

    Englisch and R

    H. Englisch and R. Englisch, V-representability in finite- dimensional spaces, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.16, L693 (1983)

    work page 1983

  58. [58]

    Kohn,v-representability and density functional the- ory, Phys

    W. Kohn,v-representability and density functional the- ory, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1596 (1983)

    work page 1983

  59. [59]

    Englisch and R

    H. Englisch and R. Englisch, Exact density functionals for ground-state energies. i. general results, Phys. Status Solidi B123, 711 (1984)

    work page 1984

  60. [60]

    J. T. Chayes, L. Chayes, and M. B. Ruskai, Density functional approach to quantum lattice systems, J. Stat. Phys.38, 497 (1985)

    work page 1985

  61. [61]

    C. A. Ullrich and W. Kohn, Degeneracy in Density Func- tional Theory: Topology in thevandnSpaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 156401 (2002)

    work page 2002

  62. [62]

    Penz \ and\ author R

    M. Penz and R. van Leeuwen, Geometrical perspective on spin–lattice density-functional theory, J. Chem. Phys. 161, 10.1063/5.0230494 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0230494 2024

  63. [63]

    V. H. Bakkestuen, M. A. Csirik, A. Laestadius, and M. Penz, Density-Functional Theory for the Dicke Hamil- tonian, J. Statist. Phys.192, 10.1007/s10955-025-03442- 9 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1007/s10955-025-03442- 2025

  64. [64]

    Garrigue, Unique continuation for many-body Schr¨ odinger operators and the Hohenberg-Kohn theorem

    L. Garrigue, Unique continuation for many-body Schr¨ odinger operators and the Hohenberg-Kohn theorem. II. The Pauli Hamiltonian, Doc. Math.25, 869 (2020)

    work page 2020

  65. [65]

    Lewin, E

    M. Lewin, E. H. Lieb, and R. Seiringer, Universal Functionals in Density Functional Theory, inDensity Functional Theory — Modeling, Mathematical Analy- sis, Computational Methods, and Applications, edited by E. Canc` es and G. Friesecke (Springer, 2023) pp. 115–182

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    Schindlmayr and R

    A. Schindlmayr and R. W. Godby, Density-functional theory and thev-representability problem for model strongly correlated electron systems, Phys. Rev. B51, 10427 (1995)

    work page 1995

  67. [67]

    R¨ ossler, C

    T. R¨ ossler, C. Verdozzi, and C.-O. Almbladh, Av 0- representability issue in lattice ensemble-DFT and its signature in lattice TDDFT, Eur. Phys. J. B91, 10.1140/epjb/e2018-90205-7 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2018-90205-7 2018

  68. [68]

    E. K. U. Gross, J. F. Dobson, and M. Petersilka, Den- sity functional theory of time-dependent phenomena, in Density Functional Theory II(Springer-Verlag, 1996) pp. 81–172

    work page 1996

  69. [69]

    M. A. Marques, C. A. Ullrich, F. Nogueira, A. Rubio, K. Burke, and E. K. U. Gross, eds.,Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006)

    work page 2006

  70. [70]

    C. A. Ullrich,Time-Dependent Density-Functional The- ory, Concepts and Applications, Oxford Graduate Texts (Oxford University Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  71. [71]

    M. A. Marques, N. T. Maitra, F. M. Nogueira, E. Gross, and A. Rubio, eds.,Fundamentals of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012)

    work page 2012

  72. [72]

    N. A. Lima, M. F. Silva, L. N. Oliveira, and K. Capelle, Density functionals not based on the electron gas: Local- density approximation for a luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 146402 (2003)

    work page 2003

  73. [73]

    Aryasetiawan and O

    F. Aryasetiawan and O. Gunnarsson, Exchange- correlation kernel in time-dependent density functional theory, Phys. Rev. B66, 165119 (2002)

    work page 2002

  74. [74]

    Requist and O

    R. Requist and O. Pankratov, Generalized Kohn-Sham system in one-matrix functional theory, Phys. Rev. B 77, 235121 (2008)

    work page 2008

  75. [75]

    Requist and O

    R. Requist and O. Pankratov, Adiabatic approxima- tion in time-dependent reduced-density-matrix func- tional theory, Phys. Rev. A81, 042519 (2010)

    work page 2010

  76. [76]

    J. I. Fuks, M. Farzanehpour, I. V. Tokatly, H. Ap- pel, S. Kurth, and A. Rubio, Time-dependent exchange- correlation functional for a Hubbard dimer: Quantifying nonadiabatic effects, Phys. Rev. A88, 062512 (2013)

    work page 2013

  77. [77]

    J. I. Fuks and N. T. Maitra, Charge transfer in time- dependent density-functional theory: Insights from the asymmetric Hubbard dimer, Phys. Rev. A89, 062502 (2014)

    work page 2014

  78. [78]

    J. I. Fuks and N. T. Maitra, Challenging adiabatic time- dependent density functional theory with a hubbard dimer: the case of time-resolved long-range charge trans- fer, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.16, 14504 (2014)

    work page 2014

  79. [79]

    D. J. Carrascal, J. Ferrer, J. C. Smith, and K. Burke, The Hubbard dimer: a density functional case study of a many-body problem, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter27, 393001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  80. [80]

    D. J. Carrascal, J. Ferrer, N. Maitra, and K. Burke, Linear response time-dependent density functional the- ory of the hubbard dimer, Eur. Phys. J. B91, 10.1140/epjb/e2018-90114-9 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2018-90114-9 2018

Showing first 80 references.