pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.09020 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-13 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall· physics.chem-ph· physics.optics

Casimir effect with dielectric matter in salted water and implications at the cell scale

Larissa In\'acio , Felipe S. S. Rosa , Astrid Lambrecht , Paulo A. Maia Neto , Serge Reynaud This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 14:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.chem-phphysics.optics
keywords Casimir effectsalted waterdielectric matteractin fiberscell scaleuniversal contributionelectromagnetic fluctuations
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Casimir interaction in salted water includes a universal contribution from electromagnetic fluctuations that dominates at distances relevant for actin fibers inside cells.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the Casimir force between dielectric objects immersed in salted water contains a universal term generated by electromagnetic fluctuations. This term decays more slowly than the usual non-universal contributions and therefore takes over at the separations that separate actin fibers within biological cells. The authors illustrate the point by computing the force with a model chosen to represent the dielectric response of cellular matter. The result indicates that this longer-range fluctuation force must be included in any description of nanoscale mechanical effects at the cell scale.

Core claim

In salted water the Casimir interaction between dielectrics acquires a universal contribution from electromagnetic fluctuations. This contribution has a longer range than the non-universal terms and dominates them at the distances relevant for actin fibers inside the cell. A model that mimics biological matter confirms that the universal Casimir effect carries important implications at the cell scale.

What carries the argument

The universal contribution to the Casimir interaction in salted water, arising from electromagnetic fluctuations and extending the interaction range between dielectric objects.

If this is right

  • The universal term dominates the non-universal contributions at separations typical of actin fibers.
  • The Casimir interaction must be considered when modeling forces that organize structures inside cells.
  • Dielectric components in ionic solutions experience longer-range attractions than previously calculated.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar calculations could be performed for other cellular filaments or membranes to check whether the universal term remains dominant.
  • In-vitro force experiments using model actin rods in controlled saline conditions could directly test the predicted range.
  • The same fluctuation mechanism may couple to other long-range forces already known in biological physics.

Load-bearing premise

The dielectric response and geometry chosen for the model accurately represent real cellular components such as actin fibers at the separations of interest.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the force between two dielectric cylinders separated by tens to hundreds of nanometers in salted water, showing whether the observed decay follows the slower universal prediction or the faster non-universal decay.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.09020 by Astrid Lambrecht, Felipe S. S. Rosa, Larissa In\'acio, Paulo A. Maia Neto, Serge Reynaud.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sketch view of the two-bulks configuration, with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Principle of the experiment reported in Ref. [47]: a silica microsphere (radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Variation of the Casimir interaction energy (in units of the thermal energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Geometry for two spheres (a) or two cylinders (b) immersed in salted water. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Universal functions (solid black curves) showing the variations of the universal free energy versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dielectric functions of water (blue) and tetradecane (gray) versus imaginary frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sketch view of the two-slabs configurations, with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Universal (red higher line) and non-universal (blue lower line) contributions to the Casimir binding energy, for two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Casimir interaction in salted water contains a universal contribution of electromagnetic fluctuations that makes it of a longer range than previously thought. The universal contribution dominates non universal ones at the distances relevant for actin fibers inside the cell. We discuss universal and non-universal contributions with a model mimicking biological matter. We also show that the universal Casimir effect should have important implications at the cell scale.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the Casimir interaction in salted water includes a universal long-range contribution arising from electromagnetic fluctuations, which dominates non-universal (short-range) contributions at separations relevant to actin fibers inside cells. Using a dielectric model that mimics biological matter (salted water plus dielectric inclusions), the authors separate universal and non-universal terms, compute their relative strength, and argue that the universal term has important implications for processes at the cell scale.

Significance. If the central claim is robust, the result would be significant for biophysics: it suggests that fluctuation-induced forces could influence cytoskeletal organization and intracellular spacing at tens-of-nm scales, where conventional Casimir or van der Waals estimates are thought to be negligible. The work also highlights how salt and dielectric dispersion can extend the range of electromagnetic interactions in aqueous biological environments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model and results sections] The dominance of the universal term at actin-relevant distances (claimed in the abstract and model discussion) is shown only within a specific choice of dielectric functions ε(iξ) for salted water and the inclusions. No experimental dielectric spectra for actin filaments or equivalent structures in physiological salt are cited to anchor the low-frequency contrast or dispersion; small variations in these parameters shift the crossover distance by tens of nm, making the reported dominance model-dependent rather than general.
  2. [Calculation of forces/energies] The separation into universal and non-universal contributions (central to the claim) is not accompanied by an explicit sensitivity analysis or parameter scan. The Lifshitz-type integral is sensitive to the precise form of the dielectric response at imaginary frequencies; without showing how the universal term remains dominant under plausible variations in ε(iξ) or geometry, the conclusion that it 'dominates' at cell-scale distances rests on unvalidated assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model description] Clarify the precise geometry and boundary conditions used for the actin-fiber model (e.g., cylinder radius, separation range) and provide the numerical values or plots that establish the crossover distance.
  2. [Introduction and model] Add references to measured dielectric data for biological filaments or salted water in the relevant frequency range to support the model parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The dominance of the universal term at actin-relevant distances (claimed in the abstract and model discussion) is shown only within a specific choice of dielectric functions ε(iξ) for salted water and the inclusions. No experimental dielectric spectra for actin filaments or equivalent structures in physiological salt are cited to anchor the low-frequency contrast or dispersion; small variations in these parameters shift the crossover distance by tens of nm, making the reported dominance model-dependent rather than general.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative details such as the precise crossover distance depend on the chosen dielectric functions. Our model uses standard literature values for salted water and a representative dielectric inclusion for biological matter. The universal long-range contribution arises generally from the zero-frequency Matsubara term under Debye screening and is robust to high-frequency details. In revision we will add a sensitivity analysis varying the low-frequency permittivity contrast by ±20% (covering plausible biological ranges) to demonstrate that dominance of the universal term persists beyond ~20-30 nm. Direct experimental spectra for actin in physiological salt are scarce in the literature; our parameters follow effective-medium values commonly used for cellular components. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The separation into universal and non-universal contributions (central to the claim) is not accompanied by an explicit sensitivity analysis or parameter scan. The Lifshitz-type integral is sensitive to the precise form of the dielectric response at imaginary frequencies; without showing how the universal term remains dominant under plausible variations in ε(iξ) or geometry, the conclusion that it 'dominates' at cell-scale distances rests on unvalidated assumptions.

    Authors: We will add an explicit sensitivity analysis and parameter scan to the revised manuscript. This will vary ε(iξ) within biologically motivated ranges, include different geometries (planar and cylindrical approximations for fibers), and confirm that the universal term remains dominant at actin-relevant distances (tens of nm) across these variations. The separation into universal and non-universal terms follows directly from the Lifshitz formula at imaginary frequencies, with the universal piece tied to the screened zero-frequency contribution. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct experimental dielectric spectra for actin filaments in physiological salt conditions are not available in the literature, preventing citation of such data to anchor model parameters.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central claim follows from standard Lifshitz calculation on chosen dielectric model

full rationale

The paper presents a Lifshitz-type calculation of the Casimir interaction in salted water using a model for the dielectric response of biological matter. The dominance of the universal contribution at actin-relevant distances is obtained by direct numerical evaluation of the force or energy integrals with the adopted ε(iξ) functions and geometry; it is not obtained by fitting parameters to the target result itself, nor by self-citation of a uniqueness theorem that forbids alternatives, nor by renaming a known empirical pattern. The model parameters are stated as inputs chosen to mimic biological matter, and the resulting dominance is a computed output rather than a definitional identity. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes a model of dielectric matter in salted water without specifying its parameters or assumptions; the universal contribution is treated as arising from electromagnetic fluctuations but its exact derivation is not shown.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5377 in / 1011 out tokens · 30423 ms · 2026-05-16T14:14:34.391009+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Planck, Theory of the energy distribution law in the normal spectrum (in geman), Verh

    M. Planck, Theory of the energy distribution law in the normal spectrum (in geman), Verh. Deutsch. Phys. Ges.2, 237 (1900)

    work page 1900

  2. [2]

    Planck, On a new radiation hypothesis (in geman), Verh

    M. Planck, On a new radiation hypothesis (in geman), Verh. Deutsch. Phys. Ges.13, 139 (1911)

    work page 1911

  3. [3]

    M. J. Klein, Thermodynamics and quanta in planck’s work, Physics Today19, 23 (1966)

    work page 1966

  4. [4]

    Darrigol, Statistics and combinatorics in early quantum theory, Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences 19, 17 (1988)

    O. Darrigol, Statistics and combinatorics in early quantum theory, Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences 19, 17 (1988)

    work page 1988

  5. [5]

    Einstein and O

    A. Einstein and O. Stern, Some arguments for the assumption of molecular agitation at absolute zero (in geman), Annalen der Physik345, 551 (1913). 12

    work page 1913

  6. [6]

    Milonni and M.-L

    P. Milonni and M.-L. Shih, Zero-point energy in early quantum theory, American Journal of Physics59, 684 (1991)

    work page 1991

  7. [7]

    Nernst, On an attempt to return from quantum-theoretical considerations to the assumption of continuous energy changes (in geman), Verh

    W. Nernst, On an attempt to return from quantum-theoretical considerations to the assumption of continuous energy changes (in geman), Verh. Deutsch. Phys. Ges.4(1916)

    work page 1916

  8. [8]

    Kragh, Preludes to dark energy: zero-point energy and vacuum speculations, Archive for history of exact sciences66, 199 (2012)

    H. Kragh, Preludes to dark energy: zero-point energy and vacuum speculations, Archive for history of exact sciences66, 199 (2012)

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    Heisenberg, On the quantum-theoretical reinterpretation of kinematical and mechanical relationships (in geman), Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik33, 879 (1925)

    W. Heisenberg, On the quantum-theoretical reinterpretation of kinematical and mechanical relationships (in geman), Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik33, 879 (1925)

    work page 1925

  10. [10]

    Born and P

    M. Born and P. Jordan, On quantum mechanics (in geman), Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik34, 858 (1925)

    work page 1925

  11. [11]

    P. A. M. Dirac, The fundamental equations of quantum mechanics, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character109, 642 (1925)

    work page 1925

  12. [12]

    M. Born, W. Heisenberg, and P. Jordan, On quantum mechanics ii (in geman), Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik35, 557 (1926)

    work page 1926

  13. [13]

    B. L. Van Der Waerden,Sources of quantum mechanics(North Holland, 1967) reprinted by Dover 2007

    work page 1967

  14. [14]

    Heisenberg, The actual content of quantum theoretical kinematics and mechanics (in geman), Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik 43, 172 (1927)

    W. Heisenberg, The actual content of quantum theoretical kinematics and mechanics (in geman), Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik 43, 172 (1927)

    work page 1927

  15. [15]

    Darrigol,From c-numbers to q-numbers: The classical analogy in the history of quantum theory, Vol

    O. Darrigol,From c-numbers to q-numbers: The classical analogy in the history of quantum theory, Vol. 8 (Univ of California Press, 1992)

    work page 1992

  16. [16]

    on quantum mechanics

    W. A. Fedak and J. J. Prentis, The 1925 born and jordan paper “on quantum mechanics”, American journal of physics 77, 128 (2009)

    work page 1925

  17. [17]

    Duncan and M

    A. Duncan and M. Janssen, Heisenberg’s umdeutung paper, inConstructing Quantum Mechanics Volume Two: The Arch, 1923-1927(Oxford University Press, 2023)

    work page 1923

  18. [18]

    P. A. M. Dirac, The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A114, 243 (1927)

    work page 1927

  19. [19]

    Einstein, Quantum theory of radiation (in geman), Phys

    A. Einstein, Quantum theory of radiation (in geman), Phys. Zeitschrift18, 121 (1917)

    work page 1917

  20. [20]

    E. A. Power, Zero-point energy and the lamb shift, American Journal of Physics34, 516 (1966)

    work page 1966

  21. [21]

    Dupont-Roc, C

    J. Dupont-Roc, C. Fabre, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Physical interpretations for radiative corrections in the non-relativistic limit, Journal of Physics B11, 563 (1978)

    work page 1978

  22. [22]

    Itzykson and J.-B

    C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber,Quantum field theory(Mc Graw Hill, 1985)

    work page 1985

  23. [23]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, G

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, G. Grynberg, and J. Dupont-Roe,Atom-photon interactions(New York, NY (United States); John Wiley and Sons Inc., 1992)

    work page 1992

  24. [24]

    P. W. Milonni,The quantum vacuum: an introduction to quantum electrodynamics(Academic press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    H. B. G. Casimir, On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates, Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetenschappen51, 79 (1948)

    work page 1948

  26. [26]

    K. A. Milton,The Casimir effect: physical manifestations of zero-point energy(World Scientific, 2001)

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    E. A. Power, Casimir-polder potential from first principles, European Journal of Physics22, 453 (2001)

    work page 2001

  28. [28]

    V. A. Parsegian,Van der Waals forces: a handbook for biologists, chemists, engineers, and physicists(Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    Reynaud and A

    S. Reynaud and A. Lambrecht, Casimir forces and vacuum energy, inQuantum Optics and Nanophotonics, Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School 101 (Oxford University Press, 2017) pp. 407–455

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Dalvit, P

    D. Dalvit, P. Milonni, D. Roberts, and F. Da Rosa,Casimir physics, Vol. 834 (Springer, 2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Palasantzas, D

    G. Palasantzas, D. A. R. Dalvit, R. Decca, V. B. Svetovoy, and A. Lambrecht, Casimir physics, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter27, 210301 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    L. M. Woods, D. A. R. Dalvit, A. Tkatchenko, P. Rodriguez-Lopez, A. W. Rodriguez, and R. Podgornik, Materials perspective on casimir and van der Waals interactions, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 045003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Stange, D

    A. Stange, D. K. Campbell, and D. J. Bishop, Science and technology of the casimir effect, Physics Today74, 42 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    K. A. Milton,State of the Quantum Vacuum, The Casimir Physics in the 2020’s(World Scientific, 2022)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Shelden, B

    C. Shelden, B. Spreng, and J. Munday, Opportunities and challenges involving repulsive Casimir forces in nanotechnology, Applied Physics Reviews11, 10.1063/5.0218274 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0218274 2024

  36. [36]

    Mehra, Temperature correction to the casimir effect, Physica37, 145 (1967)

    J. Mehra, Temperature correction to the casimir effect, Physica37, 145 (1967)

    work page 1967

  37. [37]

    L. S. Brown and G. J. Maclay, Vacuum stress between conducting plates: an image solution, Physical Review184, 1272 (1969)

    work page 1969

  38. [38]

    Schwinger, L

    J. Schwinger, L. L. DeRaad Jr, and K. A. Milton, Casimir effect in dielectrics, Annals of Physics115, 1 (1978)

    work page 1978

  39. [39]

    Matsubara, A new approach to quantum-statistical mechanics, Progress of theoretical physics14, 351 (1955)

    T. Matsubara, A new approach to quantum-statistical mechanics, Progress of theoretical physics14, 351 (1955)

    work page 1955

  40. [40]

    Lambrecht, P

    A. Lambrecht, P. A. Maia Neto, and S. Reynaud, The casimir effect within scattering theory, New Journal of Physics8, 10.1088/1367-2630/8/10/243 (2006)

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/8/10/243 2006

  41. [41]

    Feinberg, A

    J. Feinberg, A. Mann, and M. Revzen, Casimir effect: The classical limit, Annals of Physics288, 103 (2001)

    work page 2001

  42. [42]

    Canaguier-Durand, G.-L

    A. Canaguier-Durand, G.-L. Ingold, M.-T. Jaekel, A. Lambrecht, P. A. Maia Neto, and S. Reynaud, Classical casimir interaction in the plane-sphere geometry, Phys. Rev. A85, 052501 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    R. S. Decca, V. Aksyuk, and D. L´ opez, Casimir Force in Micro and Nano Electro Mechanical Systems, inCasimir Physics, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 834 (Springer, 2011) pp. 287–309

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    Bimonte, B

    G. Bimonte, B. Spreng, P. A. Maia Neto, G.-L. Ingold, G. L. Klimchitskaya, V. M. Mostepanenko, and R. S. Decca, Measurement of the casimir force between 0.2 and 8µm: Experimental procedures and comparison with theory, Universe 7, 93 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    D. S. Ether, L. B. Pires, S. Umrath, D. Martinez, Y. Ayala, B. Pontes, G. R. de S. Ara´ ujo, S. Frases, G.-L. Ingold, F. S. S. Rosa, N. B. Viana, H. M. Nussenzveig, and P. A. M. Neto, Probing the casimir force with optical tweezers, Europhysics 13 Letters112, 44001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    P. A. Maia Neto, F. S. S. Rosa, L. B. Pires, A. B. Moraes, A. Canaguier-Durand, R. Gu´ erout, A. Lambrecht, and S. Reynaud, Scattering theory of the screened casimir interaction in electrolytes, The European Physical Journal D73, 178 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    L. B. Pires, D. S. Ether, B. Spreng, G. R. S. Ara´ ujo, R. S. Decca, R. S. Dutra, M. Borges, F. S. S. Rosa, G.-L. Ingold, M. J. B. Moura, S. Frases, B. Pontes, H. M. Nussenzveig, S. Reynaud, N. B. Viana, and P. A. Maia Neto, Probing the screening of the casimir interaction with optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033037 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Schoger, B

    T. Schoger, B. Spreng, G.-L. Ingold, P. A. Maia Neto, and S. Reynaud, Universal Casimir interaction between two dielectric spheres in salted water, Physical Review Letters128, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.230602 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.230602 2022

  49. [49]

    Schoger, B

    T. Schoger, B. Spreng, G.-L. Ingold, A. Lambrecht, P. A. Maia Neto, and S. Reynaud, Universal Casimir interactions in the sphere-sphere geometry, International Journal of Modern Physics A37, 10.1142/S0217751X22410056 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x22410056 2022

  50. [50]

    Spreng, H

    B. Spreng, H. Berthoumieux, A. Lambrecht, A.-F. Bitbol, P. A. Maia Neto, and S. Reynaud, Universal casimir attraction between filaments at the cell scale, New Journal of Physics26, 013009 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    In´ acio, F

    L. In´ acio, F. S. Rosa, S. Reynaud, and P. A. Maia Neto, Casimir repulsion turned into attraction by the nonlocal response of salted water, Phys. Rev. A111, 012816 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Ashkin,Optical Trapping and Manipulation of Neutral Particles Using Lasers: A Reprint Volume with Commentaries (World Scientific, 2007)

    A. Ashkin,Optical Trapping and Manipulation of Neutral Particles Using Lasers: A Reprint Volume with Commentaries (World Scientific, 2007)

    work page 2007

  53. [53]

    H. M. Nussenzveig, Bohr’s ‘light and life’ revisited, Physica Scripta90, 118001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    C. J. Bustamante, Y. R. Chemla, S. Liu, and M. D. Wang, Optical tweezers in single-molecule biophysics, Nature Reviews Methods Primers1, 25 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    N. B. Viana, M. S. Rocha, O. N. Mesquita, A. Mazolli, P. A. Maia Neto, and H. M. Nussenzveig, Towards absolute calibration of optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. E75, 021914 (2007)

    work page 2007

  56. [56]

    R. S. Dutra, N. B. Viana, P. A. Maia Neto, and H. M. Nussenzveig, Absolute calibration of forces in optical tweezers, Physical Review A90, 013825 (2014)

    work page 2014

  57. [57]

    Sarshar, W

    M. Sarshar, W. Wong, and B. Anvari, Comparative study of methods to calibrate the stiffness of a single-beam gradient- force optical tweezers over various laser trapping powers, Journal of Biomedical Optics19, 115001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Spreng, P

    B. Spreng, P. A. Maia Neto, and G.-L. Ingold, Plane-wave approach to the exact van der Waals interaction between colloid particles, The Journal of Chemical Physics153, 024115 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    R. O. Nunes, B. Spreng, R. de Melo e Souza, G.-L. Ingold, P. A. Maia Neto, and F. S. S. Rosa, The Casimir interaction between spheres immersed in electrolytes, Universe7, 156 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Spreng, M

    B. Spreng, M. Hartmann, V. Henning, P. A. Maia Neto, and G.-L. Ingold, Proximity force approximation and specular reflection: Application of the wkb limit of mie scattering to the casimir effect, Phys. Rev. A97, 062504 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    Parsegian and B

    V. Parsegian and B. Ninham, Temperature-dependent van der Waals forces, Biophysical Journal10, 664 (1970)

    work page 1970

  62. [62]

    Parsegian and B

    V. Parsegian and B. Ninham, Toward the correct calculation of van der Waals interactions between lyophobic colloids in an aqueous medium, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science37, 332 (1971)

    work page 1971

  63. [63]

    Parsegian and G

    V. Parsegian and G. H. Weiss, Spectroscopic parameters for computation of van der Waals forces, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science81, 285 (1981)

    work page 1981

  64. [64]

    P. J. van Zwol and G. Palasantzas, Repulsive casimir forces between solid materials with high-refractive-index intervening liquids, Phys. Rev. A81, 062502 (2010)

    work page 2010

  65. [65]

    Bitbol, A

    A.-F. Bitbol, A. Canaguier-Durand, A. Lambrecht, and S. Reynaud, Pairwise summation approximation for casimir po- tentials and its limitations, Phys. Rev. B87, 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.045413 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.045413 2013

  66. [66]

    Pirozhenko and A

    I. Pirozhenko and A. Lambrecht, Influence of slab thickness on the casimir force, Phys. Rev. A77, 013811 (2008)

    work page 2008

  67. [67]

    Salbreux, G

    G. Salbreux, G. Charras, and E. Paluch, Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis, Trends Cell Biol22, 536 (2012)

    work page 2012

  68. [68]

    Murrell, P

    M. Murrell, P. W. Oakes, M. Lenz, and M. L. Gardel, Forcing cells into shape: the mechanics of actomyosin contractility, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol16, 486 (2015)

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    Burla, Y

    F. Burla, Y. Mulla, B. E. Vos, A. Aufderhorst-Roberts, and G. H. Koenderink, From mechanical resilience to active material properties in biopolymer networks, Nature Reviews Physics1, 249 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    J. X. Tang and P. A. Janmey, The polyelectrolyte nature of F-actin and the mechanism of actin bundle formation, J Biol Chem271, 8556 (1996)

    work page 1996

  71. [71]

    Deshpande and T

    S. Deshpande and T. Pfohl, Hierarchical self-assembly of actin in micro-confinements using microfluidics, Biomicrofluidics 6, 34120 (2012)

    work page 2012

  72. [72]

    Volkmann, D

    N. Volkmann, D. DeRosier, P. Matsudaira, and D. Hanein, An atomic model of actin filaments cross-linked by fimbrin and its implications for bundle assembly and function, Journal of Cell Biology153, 947 (2001)

    work page 2001

  73. [73]

    Bohr, Light and life, Nature131, 457 (1933)

    N. Bohr, Light and life, Nature131, 457 (1933)

    work page 1933

  74. [74]

    Schr¨ odinger,What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell(Cambridge University Presss, 1944)

    E. Schr¨ odinger,What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell(Cambridge University Presss, 1944)

    work page 1944