pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.16088 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-22 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Carrier-envelope phase and pulse shape effects on vacuum pair production in asymmetric electric fields with bell-shaped envelopes

Abhinav Jangir , Anees Ahmed This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 11:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords electron-positron pair productionSchwinger effectcarrier-envelope phaseasymmetric electric fieldquantum Vlasov equationpulse envelopemultiphoton processes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Asymmetric electric pulses with tuned carrier-envelope phase can increase vacuum pair production by two to three orders of magnitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the impact of carrier-envelope phase and pulse shape on electron-positron pair creation in time-dependent asymmetric electric fields. Using numerical solutions to the quantum Vlasov equation, it demonstrates that the combination of temporal asymmetry, envelope steepness, and phase can lead to significant enhancements in pair density. This sensitivity arises because multiphoton processes become dominant in certain asymmetric configurations, such as long falling pulses. The authors use a turning-point analysis to qualitatively explain these effects for non-analytic fields.

Core claim

Pair production in vacuum under asymmetric electric fields with bell-shaped envelopes shows extreme sensitivity to temporal asymmetry and envelope type. The density of produced pairs is enhanced by two to three orders of magnitude for specific choices of field parameters including carrier-envelope phase. Multiphoton pair production dominates the Schwinger mechanism for long falling-pulse asymmetry, while short falling pulses with flat-topped profiles further increase production.

What carries the argument

Numerical solution of the quantum Vlasov equation for the pair production rate, combined with turning-point analysis using regularization for non-analytic electric fields.

If this is right

  • The total number of produced pairs per unit volume increases dramatically with optimized asymmetry and phase.
  • Multiphoton processes take over from Schwinger tunneling in long falling asymmetric pulses.
  • Different envelopes (Gaussian, Lorentzian, Sauter) lead to qualitatively different momentum distributions.
  • Flat-topped profiles in short falling pulses facilitate higher pair yields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These results could guide the design of laser pulses to achieve observable pair production at lower intensities.
  • Control via carrier-envelope phase might enable precision studies of strong-field quantum electrodynamics.
  • Similar parameter tuning could apply to other nonlinear vacuum effects like photon-photon scattering.

Load-bearing premise

The regularization scheme in the turning-point analysis for non-analytic electric fields accurately reflects the behavior seen in the full numerical solution of the quantum Vlasov equation.

What would settle it

Numerical computation of the pair density for a specific asymmetric Lorentzian pulse with varying carrier-envelope phase and direct comparison to the turning-point predictions would test if the qualitative explanations hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.16088 by Abhinav Jangir, Anees Ahmed.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: shows the electric field (9) with a Gaussian en￾velope for several values of β, φ and ν. A key distinc￾tion between the field profiles is that the Gaussian and Lorentzian envelopes become increasingly flat-topped as their width τ and the order ν are increased, whereas the Sauter envelope does not. The reason is simple: we have defined the Sauter envelope such that the power 2ν acts on the function sech rat… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: show turning points at nearby momenta where the momentum distribution has a smaller value. In all cases the turning points arrange themselves in an infinitely tall hourglass structure symmetric about the real axis. The key difference lies in the proximity of turning points to the real axis: the momenta at the peaks correspond to turning points closer to the real axis as compared to those off the peaks. Thi… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the combined effects of carrier-envelope phase and laser pulse shape on electron-positron pair production in the presence of an external time-dependent asymmetric electric field by solving the quantum Vlasov equation. We analyze how the pulse asymmetry, the envelope type (Gaussian, Lorentzian and Sauter), and the carrier-envelope phase jointly influence the momentum distribution and the total number of produced pairs per unit volume. Our results show that pair production exhibits extreme sensitivity to both the degree of temporal asymmetry and the steepness of the envelope on either side of the pulse. These effects are qualitatively explained through a turning-point analysis for the non-analytic electric field using a regularization scheme. We observe that multiphoton pair production dominates the Schwinger mechanism in the case of a long falling-pulse asymmetry. For a short falling pulse with a flat-topped profile, pair production is further facilitated. We demonstrate that the density of produced pairs can be enhanced by two to three orders of magnitude by choosing certain field parameters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript numerically solves the quantum Vlasov equation to study electron-positron pair production in time-dependent asymmetric electric fields with Gaussian, Lorentzian, and Sauter bell-shaped envelopes. It examines the joint influence of pulse asymmetry ratio, envelope steepness, and carrier-envelope phase on the momentum spectrum and total pair density per unit volume. The central result is that suitable choices of these parameters yield a two-to-three-order-of-magnitude enhancement in pair density, with multiphoton processes dominating for long falling-pulse asymmetry and further facilitation for short flat-top profiles; the enhancement is qualitatively attributed to a turning-point analysis that employs an unspecified regularization scheme for non-analytic fields.

Significance. If the numerical results prove robust, the work demonstrates substantial parametric control over vacuum pair production, which could guide optimization of future high-intensity laser experiments targeting the Schwinger or multiphoton regimes. The direct, parameter-free numerical approach using the standard quantum Vlasov equation is a clear strength, as the field amplitude, duration, asymmetry ratio, and CEP are varied externally without fitted quantities. The qualitative turning-point interpretation adds insight but requires validation to be fully convincing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Turning-point analysis section] Turning-point analysis section: the regularization scheme for non-analytic electric fields is not specified in detail, and no direct quantitative comparison is presented between the turning-point predictions and the full Vlasov numerical solutions for the same parameters. This is load-bearing for the interpretation because the headline claim attributes the 2–3 order enhancement specifically to temporal asymmetry and envelope steepness, which the turning-point analysis is invoked to explain (especially the dominance of multiphoton over Schwinger contributions in the long falling-pulse case).
  2. [Numerical results section] Numerical results section: the reported pair densities and momentum distributions lack any convergence tests, grid-resolution studies, or error estimates. Given that the central claim rests on orders-of-magnitude changes driven by changes in asymmetry and envelope type, demonstration that the Vlasov solver is stable and accurate to better than the reported enhancement factor is required.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the range of field amplitudes E0 and pulse durations used to obtain the quoted enhancements should be stated explicitly so readers can assess the regime.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have revised the manuscript to address the concerns about the turning-point analysis and numerical convergence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Turning-point analysis section: the regularization scheme for non-analytic electric fields is not specified in detail, and no direct quantitative comparison is presented between the turning-point predictions and the full Vlasov numerical solutions for the same parameters. This is load-bearing for the interpretation because the headline claim attributes the 2–3 order enhancement specifically to temporal asymmetry and envelope steepness, which the turning-point analysis is invoked to explain (especially the dominance of multiphoton over Schwinger contributions in the long falling-pulse case).

    Authors: We agree that additional detail is required. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the turning-point section to fully specify the regularization procedure applied to the non-analytic fields. We have also added a direct quantitative comparison of pair-production rates obtained from the turning-point method and the numerical Vlasov solutions for representative parameter values; the comparison supports the qualitative attribution of the observed enhancements to temporal asymmetry and envelope steepness. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Numerical results section: the reported pair densities and momentum distributions lack any convergence tests, grid-resolution studies, or error estimates. Given that the central claim rests on orders-of-magnitude changes driven by changes in asymmetry and envelope type, demonstration that the Vlasov solver is stable and accurate to better than the reported enhancement factor is required.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for explicit numerical validation. The revised manuscript includes a new subsection on numerical methods that reports convergence tests with respect to momentum-space grid resolution, time-step size, and spatial discretization. Error estimates are provided showing that numerical uncertainties remain well below the reported two-to-three-order-of-magnitude enhancements, confirming the robustness of the results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: direct numerical Vlasov integration with external parameters

full rationale

The central results (pair density, momentum spectra, 2-3 order enhancement) are obtained by solving the quantum Vlasov equation numerically for externally chosen field parameters (amplitude, duration, asymmetry, CEP, envelope type). No parameter is fitted to the output quantities and then relabeled as a prediction. The turning-point analysis is invoked only for qualitative interpretation after the numerics, not to derive the quantitative claims. No self-citation chain or ansatz is load-bearing for the reported enhancements. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the stated numerical method.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation assumes standard QED in 3+1 dimensions with a classical external field; no new entities are introduced. Free parameters are the field amplitude, pulse duration, asymmetry ratio, and CEP, all varied parametrically rather than fitted to data.

free parameters (3)
  • field amplitude E0
    External parameter scanned to reach the non-perturbative regime
  • pulse duration and asymmetry ratio
    Varied to produce the reported sensitivity
  • carrier-envelope phase
    Scanned to demonstrate phase dependence
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The quantum Vlasov equation accurately describes pair production in a classical time-dependent electric field
    Standard starting point for numerical studies of the Schwinger effect
  • ad hoc to paper A regularization scheme can be applied to the turning-point analysis for non-analytic fields without altering the qualitative conclusions
    Invoked to explain results for the chosen envelopes

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5472 in / 1596 out tokens · 25913 ms · 2026-05-16T11:53:52.539668+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    may enable experimental investigations of QED vac- uum decay into electron-positron pairs in the near future. The non-perturbative non-equilibrium process of electron-positron pair production has been studied using a variety of approaches, including the WKB approxima- tion [10], effective Lagrangian techniques [11], worldline instanton methods [12], the W...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    P. A. M. Dirac, The quantum theory of the electron, Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Con- taining Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character 117, 610 (1928)

    work page 1928

  3. [3]

    Sauter, On the behavior of an electron in a homoge- neous electric field in dirac’s relativistic theory, Z

    F. Sauter, On the behavior of an electron in a homoge- neous electric field in dirac’s relativistic theory, Z. Phys 69, 742 (1931)

    work page 1931

  4. [4]

    Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polariza- tion, Physical Review82, 664 (1951)

    J. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polariza- tion, Physical Review82, 664 (1951)

    work page 1951

  5. [5]

    Strickland and G

    D. Strickland and G. Mourou, Compression of amplified chirped optical pulses, Optics communications55, 447 (1985)

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    J. W. Yoon, Y. G. Kim, I. W. Choi, J. H. Sung, H. W. Lee, S. K. Lee, and C. H. Nam, Realization of laser in- tensity over 1023 w/cm2, Optica8, 630 (2021). [6]https://www.eli-laser.eu/. [7]https://www.xfel.eu/

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Ringwald, Pair production from vacuum at the focus of an x-ray free electron laser, Physics Letters B510, 107 (2001)

    A. Ringwald, Pair production from vacuum at the focus of an x-ray free electron laser, Physics Letters B510, 107 (2001)

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Khazanov, A

    E. Khazanov, A. Shaykin, I. Kostyukov, V. Ginzburg, I. Mukhin, I. Yakovlev, A. Soloviev, I. Kuznetsov, S. Mironov, A. Korzhimanov,et al., exawatt center for extreme light studies, High Power Laser Science and En- gineering11, e78 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Popov, Pair production in a variable external field (quasiclassical approximation), Soviet Journal of Exper- imental and Theoretical Physics34, 709 (1972)

    V. Popov, Pair production in a variable external field (quasiclassical approximation), Soviet Journal of Exper- imental and Theoretical Physics34, 709 (1972)

    work page 1972

  10. [10]

    Dunneet al., From fields to strings: circumnavigat- ing theoretical physics, Heisenberg–Euler Effective La- grangians: Basics and Extensions1, 445 (2005)

    G. Dunneet al., From fields to strings: circumnavigat- ing theoretical physics, Heisenberg–Euler Effective La- grangians: Basics and Extensions1, 445 (2005)

    work page 2005

  11. [11]

    G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert, Worldline instantons and pair production in inhomogenous fields, Physical Re- view D-Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology72, 105004 (2005)

    work page 2005

  12. [12]

    Olugh, Z.-L

    O. Olugh, Z.-L. Li, B.-S. Xie, and R. Alkofer, Pair pro- 12 duction in differently polarized electric fields with fre- quency chirps, Physical Review D99, 036003 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    N.-Z. Chen, O. Amat, L.-N. Hu, H.-H. Fan, and B.-S. Xie, Asymmetric pulse effects on pair production in chirped electric fields, Physical Review D109, 076015 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Hebenstreit,Schwinger effect in inhomogeneous elec- tric fields, Ph.D

    F. Hebenstreit,Schwinger effect in inhomogeneous elec- tric fields, Ph.D. thesis, University of Graz (2011)

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Blinne,Electron positron pair production in strong electric fields, Ph.D

    A. Blinne,Electron positron pair production in strong electric fields, Ph.D. thesis, University of Jena (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Z. Li, D. Lu, and B. Xie, Effects of electric field polariza- tions on pair production, Physical Review D92, 085001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Kluger, E

    Y. Kluger, E. Mottola, and J. M. Eisenberg, Quantum vlasov equation and its markov limit, Physical Review D 58, 125015 (1998)

    work page 1998

  18. [18]

    Alkofer, M

    R. Alkofer, M. Hecht, C. D. Roberts, S. Schmidt, and D. Vinnik, Pair creation and an x-ray free electron laser, Physical Review Letters87, 193902 (2001)

    work page 2001

  19. [19]

    Blaschke, A

    D. Blaschke, A. Prozorkevich, C. Roberts, S. Schmidt, and S. Smolyansky, Pair production and optical lasers, Physical review letters96, 140402 (2006)

    work page 2006

  20. [20]

    Orthaber, F

    M. Orthaber, F. Hebenstreit, and R. Alkofer, Momentum spectra for dynamically assisted schwinger pair produc- tion, Physics Letters B698, 80 (2011)

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    G. R. Mocken, M. Ruf, C. M¨ uller, and C. H. Keitel, Non- perturbative multiphoton electron-positron–pair creation in laser fields, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics81, 022122 (2010)

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    M. Ruf, G. R. Mocken, C. M¨ uller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. Keitel, Pair production in laser fields oscillating in space and time, Physical review letters102, 080402 (2009)

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    Kohlf¨ urst, H

    C. Kohlf¨ urst, H. Gies, and R. Alkofer, Effective mass sig- natures in multiphoton pair production, Physical Review Letters112, 050402 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Hebenstreit, R

    F. Hebenstreit, R. Alkofer, G. V. Dunne, and H. Gies, Momentum signatures for schwinger pair production in short laser pulses with a subcycle structure, Physical re- view letters102, 150404 (2009)

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    Sch¨ utzhold, H

    R. Sch¨ utzhold, H. Gies, and G. Dunne, Dynamically as- sisted schwinger mechanism, Physical review letters101, 130404 (2008)

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    Nuriman, B.-S

    A. Nuriman, B.-S. Xie, Z.-L. Li, and D. Sayipjamal, En- hanced electron–positron pair creation by dynamically assisted combinational fields, Physics Letters B717, 465 (2012)

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Fey and R

    C. Fey and R. Sch¨ utzhold, Momentum dependence in the dynamically assisted sauter-schwinger effect, Physi- cal Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cos- mology85, 025004 (2012)

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    L.-J. Li, M. Mohamedsedik, and B.-S. Xie, Enhanced dy- namically assisted pair production in spatial inhomoge- neous electric fields with the frequency chirping, Physical Review D104, 036015 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    C. K. Dumlu, Schwinger vacuum pair production in chirped laser pulses, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology82, 045007 (2010)

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    Minet al., Chin

    J. Minet al., Chin. Phys. B22, 100307 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    C. Gong, Z. Li, B. Xie, and Y. Li, Electron-positron pair production in frequency modulated laser fields, Physical Review D101, 016008 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Oluk, B.-S

    O. Oluk, B.-S. Xie, M. A. Bake, and S. Dulat, Electron- positron pair production in a strong asymmetric laser electric field, Frontiers of Physics9, 157 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Olugh, Z.-L

    O. Olugh, Z.-L. Li, and B.-S. Xie, Asymmetric pulse ef- fects on pair production in polarized electric fields, High Power Laser Science and Engineering8, e38 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    J. C. Bloch, V. Mizerny, A. Prozorkevich, C. D. Roberts, S. Schmidt, S. Smolyansky, and D. Vinnik, Pair cre- ation: Back reactions and damping, Physical Review D 60, 116011 (1999)

    work page 1999

  35. [35]

    Tanji, Dynamical view of pair creation in uniform elec- tric and magnetic fields, Annals of Physics324, 1691 (2009)

    N. Tanji, Dynamical view of pair creation in uniform elec- tric and magnetic fields, Annals of Physics324, 1691 (2009)

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    Smolyansky, V

    S. Smolyansky, V. Mizerny, D. Vinnik, A. Prozorkevich, and V. Toneev, The non-equilibrium distribution func- tion of particles and anti-particles created in strong fields, inProgress in Nonequilibrium Green’s Functions(World Scientific, 2000) pp. 375–382

    work page 2000

  37. [37]

    Vinnik, A

    D. Vinnik, A. Prozorkevich, S. Smolyansky, V. Toneev, M. Hecht, C. D. Roberts, and S. Schmidt, Plasma pro- duction and thermalisation in a strong field, The Eu- ropean Physical Journal C-Particles and Fields22, 341 (2001)

    work page 2001

  38. [38]

    Roberts, S

    C. Roberts, S. Schmidt, and D. Vinnik, Quantum effects with an x-ray free-electron laser, Physical review letters 89, 153901 (2002)

    work page 2002

  39. [39]

    Prakapenia and G

    M. Prakapenia and G. Vereshchagin, Pauli blocking ef- fects on pair creation in strong electric field, Physical Review D108, 013002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Jiang, C

    R. Jiang, C. Gong, Z. Li, and Y. Li, Backreaction effect and plasma oscillation in pair production for rapidly os- cillating electric fields, Physical Review D108, 076015 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Keldysh, Ionization in the field of a strong electromag- netic wave, Sov

    L. Keldysh, Ionization in the field of a strong electromag- netic wave, Sov. Phys. JETP20, 1307 (1965)

    work page 1965

  42. [42]

    Br´ ezin and C

    E. Br´ ezin and C. Itzykson, Pair production in vacuum by an alternating field, Physical Review D2, 1191 (1970)

    work page 1970

  43. [43]

    V. S. Popov, Tunnel and multiphoton ionization of atoms and ions in a strong laser field (keldysh theory), Phys. Usp.47, 855 (2004)

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    Aleksandrov, D

    I. Aleksandrov, D. Sevostyanov, and V. Shabaev, Schwinger particle production: rapid switch off of the external field versus dynamical assistance, Physical Re- view D111, 016010 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Abdukerim, Z.-L

    N. Abdukerim, Z.-L. Li, and B.-S. Xie, Effects of laser pulse shape and carrier envelope phase on pair produc- tion, Physics Letters B726, 820 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    A. Otto, H. Oppitz, and B. K¨ ampfer, Assisted vacuum decay by time-dependent electric fields, The European Physical Journal A54, 23 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    A. D. Panferov, S. A. Smolyansky, A. Otto, B. K¨ ampfer, D. B. Blaschke, and L. Juchnowski, Assisted dynamical schwinger effect: pair production in a pulsed bifrequent field, The European Physical Journal D70, 56 (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Braset al., (2025), arXiv:2505.24488 [hep-ph]

    J. Braset al., (2025), arXiv:2505.24488 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Mohamedsedik, L.-J

    M. Mohamedsedik, L.-J. Li, L. Wang, O. Amat, L.-N. Hu, and B. Xie, Phase effect on and symmetry of pair pro- duction in inhomogeneous electric fields with chirping, The European Physical Journal Plus138, 316 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Mohamedsedik, L.-J

    M. Mohamedsedik, L.-J. Li, and B. Xie, Schwinger pair production in inhomogeneous electric fields with symmet- rical frequency chirp, Physical Review D104, 016009 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    C. K. Dumlu and G. V. Dunne, Interference effects in schwinger vacuum pair production for time-dependent laser pulses, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Grav- itation, and Cosmology83, 065028 (2011). 13

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    H. Taya, T. Fujimori, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, Exact wkb analysis of the vacuum pair production by time-dependent electric fields, Journal of High Energy Physics2021, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Akkermans and G

    E. Akkermans and G. V. Dunne, Ramsey fringes and time-domain multiple-slit interference from vacuum, Physical Review Letters108, 030401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  54. [54]

    Z.-L. Li, D. Lu, and B.-S. Xie, Multiple-slit interfer- ence effect in the time domain for boson pair production, Physical Review D89, 067701 (2014)

    work page 2014

  55. [55]

    C. K. Dumlu and G. V. Dunne, Complex worldline in- stantons and quantum interference in vacuum pair pro- duction, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravita- tion, and Cosmology84, 125023 (2011)

    work page 2011