Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Rotating a hot gauge plasma shifts only its propagators, not its interaction vertices.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 07:51 UTC pith:3ITASJJ3

load-bearing objection A useful but not fully rigorous extension of rotating thermal field theory to gauge fields; the propagator formulas rely on a continuum limit the paper never reconciles with its own ΩR<1 convergence bound. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2601.18875 v2 pith:3ITASJJ3 submitted 2026-01-26 hep-th hep-ph

Thermal Gauge Theory for a Rotating Plasma

Alberto Salvio This is my paper
classification hep-th hep-ph MSC 81T1381T28 PACS 11.10.Wx11.15.-q
keywords thermal gauge theoryrotating plasmathermal vorticitygeneralized KMS conditionthermal propagatorsghost fieldsperturbative quantum field theorychemical potential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to make perturbative calculations in any thermally equilibrated gauge theory — one that can rotate and carry chemical potentials — a matter of substituting new propagators into otherwise standard Feynman rules. It constructs the equilibrium path integral for the most general density matrix, derives generalized KMS conditions for arbitrary operator representations, and uses them to write all thermal propagators for gauge fields and ghost fields in closed form. If this is right, a rotating quark–gluon plasma, a color-superconducting neutron-star interior, and the early universe after reheating can all be studied quantitatively with the same vertices already known from ordinary thermal field theory, while rotation only enters through the propagators. The pay-off is a model-independent recipe rather than a case-by-case re-derivation.

Core claim

The central discovery, on the paper's own terms, is that in perturbation theory the equilibrium density matrix exp[−β(H−ΩJ−Σ_a μ_a Q_a)]/Z modifies a gauge theory exclusively through its two-point functions: rotation and chemical potentials change every thermal propagator — gauge fields, ghosts, scalars, fermions — but leave every interaction vertex at its zero-rotation, zero-chemical-potential form. The proof runs through a path-integral quantization in an axial gauge, a coordinate rotation that maps the rotating frame back to an inertial frame with a twisted-periodicity condition on the fields, and generalized KMS conditions that supply the boundary data fixing all propagators. Concrete ou

What carries the argument

The machinery is the generalized KMS condition: an exact relation between the two non-time-ordered two-point functions G< and G>, extended here to arbitrary Lorentz and internal-symmetry representations and to arbitrary Ω and μ. Because rotation and chemical potentials enter through a modified Hamiltonian, KMS fixes the propagators as boundary conditions on the same differential equations the non-rotating propagators satisfy; the net effect is to shift the Bose–Einstein occupation numbers by azimuthal mode number mΩ and by chemical-potential charges. The second load-bearing device is the path integral over a contour in complex time with twisted-periodicity boundary conditions, which turns th

Load-bearing premise

The entire construction presumes that the rotating equilibrium ensemble is well defined in the infinite-volume limit in which the propagators are written; if the combination H−ΩJ is not bounded below, or if the continuum azimuthal sums let ω−mΩ become negative, the Bose–Einstein factors and the analyticity argument stop making sense.

What would settle it

Evaluate the scalar spectral sum (6.20) at fixed Ω>0 and take the infinite-volume limit: if the sum over azimuthal number m of f_B(ω−mΩ) diverges or produces negative occupation numbers for some allowed ω, then the explicit propagator is not a bona fide thermal two-point function. A numerical check with a cylindrical boundary of radius R and ΩR<1, letting R grow, should show whether the closed-form expression is the correct limit.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Any perturbative calculation in a rotating plasma — decay rates, particle production, transport coefficients — can use standard interaction vertices with the new propagators, including gauge self-interactions and ghost interactions.
  • The complete gauge-field and ghost propagators, including color-charge shifts, apply directly to non-Abelian plasmas with color chemical potentials, such as the color-superconducting phases expected inside compact stars.
  • Both real-time and imaginary-time formalisms are covered, so the recipe works equally for equilibrium thermodynamics and for dynamical rate calculations.
  • The result holds for arbitrary gauge groups and arbitrary matter sectors, so it transfers unchanged to hidden-sector gauge theories and extensions of known particle physics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An unstated corollary is that the no-vertex-change theorem is a perturbative statement; non-perturbative probes such as the order parameters for confinement and deconfinement could still acquire genuine rotation dependence through dressed vertices, so extrapolating to strong coupling needs caution.
  • The closed-form propagators are written for a boundary-free cylinder, whereas a real rotating star has a finite radius; discretizing the radial integral with a wall condition should yield a finite-volume version and may cure possible convergence issues in the infinite-volume limit.
  • The generalized KMS factor exp[−β(k_0−mΩ)] suggests a sharp observable: the ratio of production to absorption rates for a particle in a rotating plasma should vary with the azimuthal quantum number m, giving a direct experimental handle on thermal vorticity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript develops a path-integral formalism for thermal gauge theories with the most general equilibrium density matrix rho = exp(-beta(H - Omega J - mu_a Q_a))/Z, covering arbitrary gauge groups and a generic matter sector. It derives generalized Kubo-Martin-Schwinger (KMS) conditions in coordinate and momentum space, uses them to compute thermal propagators for scalars, gauge fields, and Faddeev-Popov ghosts in a rotating Feynman gauge, and argues that in perturbation theory only the propagators are modified by Omega and mu_a, while the vertices remain unmodified. The scalar result is shown to reproduce the earlier operator-based result of Ref. [8], and an explicit SU(3) color-chemical-potential example is given for the gauge-field propagator.

Significance. If the central claims are valid, this paper provides a useful, model-independent toolkit for perturbative calculations in rotating plasmas within gauge theories, extending earlier scalar/fermion treatments to the gauge sector. The explicit propagators and generalized KMS relations are valuable and go beyond previous specific studies. The manuscript contains no fitted parameters; the derivation is from first principles, and the scalar limit is checked against the literature. However, the main output is currently not fully rigorous: the analyticity/KMS derivation relies on a finite-volume convergence assumption that is not implemented in the explicit continuum propagators, and there is a sign issue in the vector KMS matrix that affects the final gauge-field formulas. These points must be resolved before the paper can serve as a reliable reference.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5.2 and Sec. 6; Eqs. (6.11), (6.20), (6.26)] The analyticity proof of Sec. 5.2 requires H - Omega J to be bounded below, which the paper itself states requires a cylindrical boundary with Omega R < 1 (Sec. 2, Eq. (2.1)). However, the propagators in Sec. 6 are written as continuum Bessel integrals over alpha in [0,infty) with no radial boundary and all m in Z. For fixed alpha and p, omega = sqrt(alpha^2+p^2+mu^2) is independent of m, so omega - m Omega is unbounded below as m -> +infty. The convergence factor exp(-tau(omega_q - Omega m_q - M_q)) in the line below Eq. (5.7) then grows for such states, and the momentum-space KMS relation (5.10) is not established for the continuum formulas. Please either derive the propagators on a finite cylinder and prove convergence to (6.20)/(6.26) as R -> infinity, or supply a boundary prescription/regularization under which the continuum expressions are defined.
  2. [Eq. (6.25) and Eq. (6.26)] The sign of the matrix D_1(-i beta Omega) appears to be inconsistent with the rotation convention in Eq. (4.3). There, D_i(t Omega) is the rotation matrix acting on the Lorentz indices of a vector operator. For the transverse components, R(theta) = exp(-i theta sigma_2) (with sigma_2 the second Pauli matrix), so setting theta = -i beta Omega gives D_1(-i beta Omega) = exp(-beta Omega sigma_2), not exp(+beta Omega sigma_2) as written in Eq. (6.25). This sign directly enters the arguments omega - (m +/- sigma_2) Omega in Eq. (6.26) and is physically important. Please correct the sign or clarify the rotation-matrix convention.
  3. [Sec. 7; Eqs. (4.7), (4.20), (7.1)] The argument that Omega-dependent vertices drop out after a time-dependent rotation of integration variables is not fully checked against the twisted thermal boundary conditions in Eq. (4.7). Rotating the spatial integration variable by angle t Omega is a time-dependent reparametrization, and at the contour endpoints t0 and t0 - i beta the rotation acts differently unless t0 is chosen specially. The new fields may therefore not satisfy the same twisted periodicity condition, and the functional measure must be tracked as well. Please provide the explicit transformation of the boundary condition, or state clearly that the equivalence is only formal. This matters because the 'only propagators are modified' statement is the central perturbative recipe of the paper.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (4.17) and surrounding text] The notation 'O_i -> 1' for the denominator is unusual and never explicitly defined. Please replace it with a standard notation, e.g., 'the same path integral with the operator insertions omitted'.
  2. [Sec. 2] The statement that the free spin-1 partition function equals the spin-0 partition function raised to the number of degrees of freedom is asserted without derivation. Since the paper later uses this as motivation, a short justification or a reference to the detailed computation would help.
  3. [Eq. (6.28)] The projector list for the SU(3) example is hard to parse in plain text. A block-matrix display or a table of eigenvalues/projectors would improve readability.
  4. [References] References [8] and [9] are given only as arXiv identifiers. If this is intended for journal submission, the final published versions or DOIs should be supplied.
  5. [Abstract and Sec. 2] The phrase 'average angular momentum' is slightly misleading: Omega is the angular-velocity variable conjugate to J in the density matrix, while the average is the expectation value of J. Consider rephrasing to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: gauge propagators and vertex theorem are derived from the density matrix and generalized KMS conditions; self-citations [8,9] supply matter-sector ingredients but do not make the central gauge-field result circular.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—the generalized KMS conditions, the gauge-field and Faddeev-Popov propagators, and the statement that Ω and μ_a modify only propagators and not vertices—are derived in the text. The density matrix ρ= e^{-β(H−Ω·J−μ_a Q_a)}/Z is the starting point, and the path-integral representation in Sec. 4 is constructed from it rather than assumed. The generalized KMS relation (5.3) follows from cyclicity of the trace, and the momentum-space version (5.10) follows from the analyticity argument in Sec. 5.2. The propagators (6.20) and (6.26) are then obtained by solving the free-field equations with the KMS relations used as boundary conditions; there are no fitted parameters and the target results are not inserted as inputs. Sec. 7 explicitly performs a change of variables to show that Ω-dependent interaction terms do not produce Ω-dependent vertices, which is an argument rather than a citation. The references [8,9] are used for scalar/fermion measures and Lagrangians and as a consistency check; while these are self-citations, the paper rederives the scalar case in Sec. 6.1 and the gauge-sector derivation does not reduce to those references. The convergence caveat regarding unbounded Bessel integrals and the finite-cylinder ΩR<1 condition is a mathematical/physical risk, not a circular reduction. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained for the main gauge-theory results, with only a minor reliance on prior same-author work for the matter sector, so the circularity score is very low.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to data: beta, Omega, and mu_a are thermodynamic inputs, not free parameters. The axioms are the equilibrium density-matrix ansatz, the convergence of the spectral representation used for analytic continuation, and the standard Faddeev-Popov gauge-fixing machinery. No new particles or entities are postulated.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The most general equilibrium density matrix is rho = e^{-beta(H - Omega*J - mu_a Q_a)}/Z, with Omega and mu_a independent thermodynamic parameters.
    Basis for the entire paper, introduced in Eq. (1.1) and attributed to Landau-Lifshitz and [8]. If rotating equilibrium states require extra frame or boundary conditions, all subsequent formulas inherit that limitation.
  • domain assumption The spectral series in Eq. (5.4) converges for real t, phi, z and beta >= 0, and remains convergent under the analytic continuation in Eq. (5.5).
    Sec. 5.2 uses this to prove analyticity and derive the momentum-space KMS relation (5.10). No rigorous proof of convergence is given, and it depends on the boundedness of H - Omega*J.
  • standard math The Faddeev-Popov procedure and the gauge invariance of L_omega justify rewriting the axial-gauge path integral in a generic gauge.
    Standard background in quantum gauge theory (Weinberg [37]), used in Sec. 4 to introduce ghosts and the rotating Feynman/Landau gauges.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19060 in / 13167 out tokens · 149531 ms · 2026-08-03T07:51:56.492913+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper provides a systematic and complete study of thermal gauge theory for generic equilibrium density matrices, which feature arbitrary values not only of temperature and chemical potentials, but also of average angular momentum. This work extends previous studies, which focused on pure scalar-fermion theories, to all gauge theories coupled to an arbitrary matter sector. Path-integral methods are developed to study ensemble averages and thermal Green's functions of general operators, with an arbitrary number of points, in all interacting gauge theories. These methods cover both the real-time and imaginary-time formalisms. Generalized Kubo-Martin-Schwinger (KMS) conditions are obtained both in coordinate and in momentum space for operators in general representations of the Lorentz and internal symmetry group. This allows us to obtain all thermal propagators including those of gauge fields and Faddeev-Popov ghosts. By analyzing all interactions in detail, it is shown that, in perturbation theory, only the propagators are affected by the average angular momentum and the chemical potentials, the vertices remain unmodified. The paper presents fully model-independent results and can, therefore, be applied to any specific thermal field theory.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 19 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Thermal Field The- ory ,

    M. L. Bellac, “Thermal Field The- ory ,” Cambridge University Press, 2011 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511721700

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511721700 2011

  2. [2]

    Quantum field theory: A modern perspective,

    V. P. Nair, “Quantum field theory: A modern perspective,” Springer New York, NY, 2005

    2005

  3. [3]

    Real and Imaginary Time Field Theory at Finite Tempera- ture and Density ,

    N. P. Landsman and C. G. van Weert, “Real and Imaginary Time Field Theory at Finite Tempera- ture and Density ,” Phys. Rept.145(1987), 141 doi:10.1016/0370-1573(87)90121-9

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(87)90121-9 1987

  4. [4]

    Field theory at finite tempera- ture and phase transitions,

    M. Quiros, “Field theory at finite tempera- ture and phase transitions,” Helv. Phys. Acta67 (1994), 451-583

    1994

  5. [5]

    Basics of Ther- mal Field Theory ,

    M. Laine and A. Vuorinen, “Basics of Ther- mal Field Theory ,” Lect. Notes Phys.925(2016), pp.1-281 Springer, 2016, doi:10.1007/978-3- 319-31933-9 [arXiv:1701.01554]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Introduction to Ther- mal Field Theory: From First Prin- ciples to Applications,

    A. Salvio, “Introduction to Ther- mal Field Theory: From First Prin- ciples to Applications,” Universe11 (2025), 16 doi:10.3390/universe11010016 [arXiv:2411.02498]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Statistical Physics

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, “Statistical Physics” (Pergamon, London, 1969)

    1969

  8. [8]

    Scalar Thermal Field Theory for a Rotating Plasma,

    A. Salvio, “Scalar Thermal Field Theory for a Rotating Plasma,” [arXiv:2503.09677]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Fermion Thermal Field Theory for a Rotating Plasma (with Applications to Neutron Stars),

    A. Salvio, “Fermion Thermal Field Theory for a Rotating Plasma (with Applications to Neutron Stars),” [arXiv:2512.16993]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Derivation of nonlinear gen- eralized equations of quantum relativistic hydro- dynamics,

    D. N. Zubarev, A. V. Prozorkevich and S. A. Smolyanskii, “Derivation of nonlinear gen- eralized equations of quantum relativistic hydro- dynamics,” Theor. Math. Phys.40(1979) no.3, 821-831 doi:10.1007/BF01032069

    doi:10.1007/bf01032069 1979

  11. [11]

    Van Weert, Maximum entropy principle and relativistic hydrodynamics, Ch

    G. Van Weert, Maximum entropy principle and relativistic hydrodynamics, Ch. Annals Phys., Volume 140, Issue 1, (1982), 133-162

    1982

  12. [12]

    Covariant statistical me- chanics and the stress-energy tensor,

    F. Becattini, “Covariant statistical me- chanics and the stress-energy tensor,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012), 244502 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.244502 [arXiv:1201.5278]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    Parity Violating Currents in Ther- mal Radiation,

    A. Vilenkin, “Parity Violating Currents in Ther- mal Radiation,” Phys. Lett. B80(1978), 150-152 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90330-1

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90330-1 1978

  14. [14]

    Macroscopic parity violat- ing effects: neutrino fluxes from rotating black holes and in rotating thermal radia- tion,

    A. Vilenkin, “Macroscopic parity violat- ing effects: neutrino fluxes from rotating black holes and in rotating thermal radia- tion,” Phys. Rev. D20(1979), 1807-1812 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.20.1807

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.20.1807 1979

  15. [15]

    Quantum field theory at finite temperature in a rotating sys- tem,

    A. Vilenkin, “Quantum field theory at finite temperature in a rotating sys- tem,” Phys. Rev. D21(1980), 2260-2269 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2260

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.21.2260 1980

  16. [16]

    Rotat- ing fermions inside a cylindrical bound- ary ,

    V. E. Ambrus and E. Winstanley , “Rotat- ing fermions inside a cylindrical bound- ary ,” Phys. Rev. D93(2016) no.10, 104014 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.104014 [arXiv:1512.05239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    Interacting fermions in rotation: chi- ral symmetry restoration, moment of in- ertia and thermodynamics,

    M. N. Chernodub and S. Gongyo, “Interacting fermions in rotation: chi- ral symmetry restoration, moment of in- ertia and thermodynamics,” JHEP01 (2017), 136 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2017)136 [arXiv:1611.02598]. 21

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    General equilibrium second-order hydro- dynamic coefficients for free quantum fields,

    M. Buzzegoli, E. Grossi and F. Becat- tini, “General equilibrium second-order hydro- dynamic coefficients for free quantum fields,” JHEP10(2017), 091 [erratum: JHEP07 (2018), 119] doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)091 [arXiv:1704.02808]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Unruh effect universality: emergent conical geometry from density operator,

    G. Y. Prokhorov, O. V. Teryaev and V. I. Za- kharov, “Unruh effect universality: emergent conical geometry from density operator,” JHEP 03(2020), 137 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2020)137 [arXiv:1911.04545]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Exact equilibrium distributions in statis- tical quantum field theory with rotation and acceleration: scalar field,

    F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli and A. Palermo, “Exact equilibrium distributions in statis- tical quantum field theory with rotation and acceleration: scalar field,” JHEP02 (2021), 101 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)101 [arXiv:2007.08249]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Thermodynamic Equilibrium of Massless Fermions with Vorticity , Chirality and Electromagnetic Field,

    M. Buzzegoli, “Thermodynamic Equilibrium of Massless Fermions with Vorticity , Chirality and Electromagnetic Field,” Lect. Notes Phys.987 (2021), 59-93 doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71427- 7 3 [arXiv:2011.09974]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Exact equilibrium distributions in sta- tistical quantum field theory with rotation and acceleration: Dirac field,

    A. Palermo, M. Buzzegoli and F. Becat- tini, “Exact equilibrium distributions in sta- tistical quantum field theory with rotation and acceleration: Dirac field,” JHEP10 (2021), 077 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)077 [arXiv:2106.08340]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Vorti- cal Effects for Free Fermions on Anti-De Sit- ter Space-Time,

    V. E. Ambrus and E. Winstanley , “Vorti- cal Effects for Free Fermions on Anti-De Sit- ter Space-Time,” Symmetry13(2021), 2019 doi:10.3390/sym13112019 [arXiv:2107.06928]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Exact spin polarization of massive and massless par- ticles in relativistic fluids at global equi- librium,

    A. Palermo and F. Becattini, “Exact spin polarization of massive and massless par- ticles in relativistic fluids at global equi- librium,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus138(2023) no.6, 547 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04169- w [arXiv:2304.02276]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Finite- Temperature Perturbation Theory of Rotating Scalar Fields,

    R. Kuboniwa and K. Mameda, “Finite- Temperature Perturbation Theory of Rotating Scalar Fields,” [arXiv:2504.04712]

    arXiv

  26. [26]

    Spontaneous breaking of global U(1) symmetry in an interacting Bose gas under rigid rotation,

    E. Siri and N. Sadooghi, “Spontaneous breaking of global U(1) symmetry in an interacting Bose gas under rigid rotation,” [arXiv:2508.17055]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Dilep- ton Production in a Rotating Thermal Medium Part I: The Rigid Rotation Approximation,

    J. D. Casta ˜no-Yepes and E. Mu ˜noz, “Dilep- ton Production in a Rotating Thermal Medium Part I: The Rigid Rotation Approximation,” [arXiv:2509.18219]

    arXiv

  28. [28]

    Chiral symmetry breaking in accelerating and rotating frames,

    Z. B. Zhu, H. L. Chen and X. G. Huang, “Chiral symmetry breaking in accelerating and rotating frames,” [arXiv:2511.03230]

    arXiv

  29. [29]

    Color superconductivity in dense quark matter,

    M. G. Alford, A. Schmitt, K. Rajagopal and T. Sch ¨afer, “Color superconductivity in dense quark matter,” Rev. Mod. Phys.80(2008), 1455-1515 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1455 [arXiv:0709.4635]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  30. [30]

    Phases and properties of color su- perconductors,

    A. Schmitt, “Phases and properties of color su- perconductors,” [arXiv:2511.07319]

    arXiv

  31. [31]

    Influence of rel- ativistic rotation on the confinement- deconfinement transition in gluodynam- ics,

    V. V. Braguta, A. Y. Kotov, D. D. Kuznedelev and A. A. Roenko, “Influence of rel- ativistic rotation on the confinement- deconfinement transition in gluodynam- ics,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.9, 094515 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094515 [arXiv:2102.05084]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    On the origin of mixed inhomogeneous phase in vortical gluon plasma,

    V. V. Braguta, M. N. Chernodub, Y. A. Gershtein and A. A. Roenko, “On the origin of mixed inhomogeneous phase in vortical gluon plasma,” JHEP09 (2025), 079 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2025)079 [arXiv:2411.15085]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes. I. General Theory and Simple Applications to Magnetic and Con- duction Problems,

    R. Kubo, “Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes. I. General Theory and Simple Applications to Magnetic and Con- duction Problems,” J. Phys. Soc. Japan 12 (1957) 570 doi:10.1143/JPSJ.12.570; P.C. Mar- tin and J. Schwinger, “Theory of Many-Particle Systems. I,” Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 1342 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.115.1342

    doi:10.1143/jpsj.12.570 1957

  34. [34]

    Introduction to thermal field the- ory ,

    T. Altherr, “Introduction to thermal field the- ory ,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A8(1993), 5605-5628 doi:10.1142/S0217751X93002216 [arXiv:hep- ph/9307277]

    arXiv 1993

  35. [35]

    Scalar Thermal Field The- ory for a Rotating Plasma; Dataset,

    A. Salvio, “Scalar Thermal Field The- ory for a Rotating Plasma; Dataset,” (2025) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15012826

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.15012826 2025

  36. [36]

    Fermion Thermal Field The- ory for a Rotating Plasma (with Applica- 22 tions to Neutron Stars); Dataset,

    A Salvio, “Fermion Thermal Field The- ory for a Rotating Plasma (with Applica- 22 tions to Neutron Stars); Dataset,” (2025) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17976344

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.17976344 2025

  37. [37]

    The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 2: Modern Applications,

    S. Weinberg, “The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 2: Modern Applications,” Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2013

    2013

  38. [38]

    Absence of two flavor color superconductivity in compact stars,

    M. Alford and K. Rajagopal, “Absence of two flavor color superconductivity in compact stars,” JHEP06(2002), 031 doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2002/06/031 [arXiv:hep-ph/0204001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  39. [39]

    Color neutral superconducting quark mat- ter,

    A. W. Steiner, S. Reddy and M. Prakash, “Color neutral superconducting quark mat- ter,” Phys. Rev. D66(2002), 094007 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.094007 [arXiv:hep- ph/0205201]

    arXiv 2002

  40. [41]

    Discon- tinuities of Green Functions in Field Theory at Finite Temperature and Density . 2,

    R. L. Kobes and G. W. Semenoff, “Discon- tinuities of Green Functions in Field Theory at Finite Temperature and Density . 2,” Nucl. Phys. B272(1986), 329-364 doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(86)90006-4 23

    doi:10.1016/0550- 1986