pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.19339 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-27 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Heat kernel approach to the one-loop effective action for nonlinear electrodynamics

Evgeny I. Buchbinder , Darren T. Grasso , Joshua R. Pinelli
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 11:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords nonlinear electrodynamicsheat kernelone-loop effective actionDeWitt coefficientsinduced actionweak fieldconformal theories
0
0 comments X

The pith

A heat kernel method computes the one-loop effective action for nonlinear electrodynamics and isolates its logarithmically divergent induced action via the a2 coefficient.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a heat kernel technique to calculate the one-loop effective action in general nonlinear electrodynamic theories. Quantization of these theories produces non-minimal differential operators that require adapted heat kernel methods. In the weak-field limit, the authors compute the first three heat kernel coefficients a0, a1, and a2 to leading order in the background field strength. This isolates the divergent induced action corresponding to the a2 coefficient. For conformal nonlinear electrodynamics, they obtain the a0 coefficient exactly and discuss how causality ensures convergence of the higher coefficients.

Core claim

In the background field formalism for nonlinear electrodynamics, the one-loop effective action's logarithmically divergent part is given by the DeWitt a2 coefficient of the heat kernel for the non-minimal operators arising from quantization. In the weak-field regime, this coefficient can be computed to leading order, yielding the induced action, while for conformal theories the a0 term is found to all orders.

What carries the argument

The DeWitt heat kernel coefficients a0, a1, a2 for non-minimal second-order differential operators in the background electromagnetic field, adapted to nonlinear electrodynamics.

If this is right

  • The induced action for weak-field NLED follows directly from the leading-order a2 coefficient.
  • Conformal NLED theories admit an exact a0 contribution without field-strength expansion.
  • Causality is necessary and sufficient for convergence of the exact a1 and a2 terms in conformal cases.
  • The method applies to any NLED Lagrangian in four-dimensional flat spacetime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same adaptation might allow heat-kernel computations in strong-field regimes where perturbative expansions fail.
  • Extension to curved backgrounds could link these results to gravitational effective actions.
  • Causality as a convergence criterion may constrain viable NLED models beyond the weak-field limit.

Load-bearing premise

Standard heat kernel techniques can be adapted to the non-minimal differential operators that arise when quantizing nonlinear electrodynamics.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the a2 coefficient for the Born-Infeld Lagrangian in the weak-field limit, checked against results from alternative regularization schemes.

read the original abstract

We develop a heat kernel method to compute the one-loop effective action for a general class of nonlinear electrodynamic (NLED) theories in four dimensional Minkowski spacetime. Working in the background field formalism, we extract the logarithmically divergent part of the effective action, the so-called induced action, corresponding to the DeWitt $a_2$ coefficient of the heat kernel. In NLED, quantisation yields non-minimal differential operators, for which standard heat kernel techniques are not immediately applicable. Considering the weak-field regime, we calculate the $a_0$, $a_1$ and $a_2$ contributions to leading order in the background electromagnetic field strength. Finally, we consider conformal NLED theories and compute the $a_0$ contribution to all orders. For this class, we comment on the role of causality being necessary and sufficient for the convergence of the exact $a_1$ and $a_2$ contributions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper develops a heat kernel method to compute the one-loop effective action for a general class of nonlinear electrodynamic (NLED) theories in four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime. Working in the background-field formalism, it extracts the logarithmically divergent part of the effective action (the induced action) corresponding to the DeWitt a2 coefficient. In the weak-field regime the a0, a1 and a2 coefficients are computed to leading order in the background electromagnetic field strength; for conformal NLED the a0 coefficient is obtained to all orders and the role of causality in the convergence of the exact a1 and a2 contributions is discussed.

Significance. If the adaptation of the heat-kernel expansion to the non-minimal operators that arise in NLED quantization is correctly carried out, the work supplies a systematic route to the one-loop induced action for broad families of NLED Lagrangians. This would be useful for constructing consistent effective-field-theory descriptions that incorporate quantum corrections while respecting causality constraints.

major comments (2)
  1. [Weak-field a2 calculation] The central technical step—modification of the Seeley-DeWitt recursion for the non-minimal second-order operators that appear after background-field quantization—is load-bearing for the a2 extraction, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit recursion relations or symbol-calculus steps that would allow an independent check that the leading-order terms in the background field strength are free of contamination.
  2. [Weak-field a2 calculation] No cross-check of the resulting a2 coefficient against the known Maxwell or Born-Infeld limits is presented; such a verification is required to confirm that the non-minimal adaptation reproduces established results before the general-NLED claim can be accepted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Weak-field a2 calculation] The central technical step—modification of the Seeley-DeWitt recursion for the non-minimal second-order operators that arise after background-field quantization—is load-bearing for the a2 extraction, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit recursion relations or symbol-calculus steps that would allow an independent check that the leading-order terms in the background field strength are free of contamination.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit recursion relations and symbol-calculus steps are important for independent verification. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix containing the full modified Seeley-DeWitt recursion for the non-minimal operators that appear in the background-field quantization of general NLED, together with the symbol-calculus expansions up to the order needed for the a2 coefficient. This will explicitly demonstrate that the leading-order contributions in the background field strength contain no contamination from higher-order terms. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Weak-field a2 calculation] No cross-check of the resulting a2 coefficient against the known Maxwell or Born-Infeld limits is presented; such a verification is required to confirm that the non-minimal adaptation reproduces established results before the general-NLED claim can be accepted.

    Authors: We accept this point. In the revised version we will include a dedicated subsection that performs the cross-check: we show that our general weak-field a2 expression reduces exactly to the known one-loop result for Maxwell electrodynamics, and we compare the Born-Infeld limit with existing computations in the literature. These verifications will be presented before the general-NLED results are discussed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct adaptation of heat kernel coefficients for non-minimal NLED operators in weak-field limit.

full rationale

The paper develops an explicit computational procedure to extract DeWitt coefficients a0, a1, a2 for the one-loop effective action of general NLED theories. It works in the background-field formalism, adapts standard heat-kernel techniques to the non-minimal second-order operators that arise after quantization, and computes the coefficients to leading order in the background field strength. No parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions; no self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems; the a2 extraction follows from the modified Seeley-DeWitt recursion applied to the operator rather than from any definitional identity or ansatz smuggled via prior work. The conformal-NLED all-orders a0 result is likewise obtained by direct expansion. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review reveals no explicit free parameters or new entities; the approach rests on established heat-kernel mathematics and background-field quantization.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Heat kernel expansion applies to the non-minimal differential operators obtained after quantizing NLED
    Invoked to extract a0, a1, a2 coefficients in the weak-field regime
  • domain assumption Background field formalism is valid for computing the one-loop effective action in NLED
    Used to isolate the logarithmically divergent induced action

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5467 in / 1284 out tokens · 30641 ms · 2026-05-16T11:03:15.700111+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    In NLED, quantisation yields non-minimal differential operators, for which standard heat kernel techniques are not immediately applicable. … we calculate the a0, a1 and a2 contributions to leading order in the background electromagnetic field strength.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArrowOfTime.lean entropy_monotone echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    the strong-field causality condition … is necessary and sufficient for the convergence of the exact a1 and a2 contributions.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Foundations of the new field theory,

    M. Born and L. Infeld, “Foundations of the new field theory,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A144no.852, 425-451 (1934) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1934

  2. [2]

    The scattering of light by light in Dirac’s theory,

    H. Euler and B. Kockel, “The scattering of light by light in Dirac’s theory,” Naturwiss.23no.15, 246-247 (1935) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1935

  3. [3]

    Consequences of Dirac Theory of the Positron

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, “Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons,” Z. Phys.98no.11-12, 714-732 (1936) [arXiv:physics/0605038] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1936

  4. [4]

    Nonlinear Electrodynamics from Quantized Strings,

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Nonlinear Electrodynamics from Quantized Strings,” Phys. Lett. B163, 123-130 (1985) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1985

  5. [5]

    Partition Function Representation for the Open Superstring Effective Action: Cancellation of Mobius Infinities and Derivative Corrections to Born–Infeld La- grangian,

    O. D. Andreev and A. A. Tseytlin, “Partition Function Representation for the Open Superstring Effective Action: Cancellation of Mobius Infinities and Derivative Corrections to Born–Infeld La- grangian,” Nucl. Phys. B311, 205-252 (1988) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1988

  6. [6]

    Dirac-Born–Infeld Action from Dirichlet Sigma Model,

    R. G. Leigh, “Dirac-Born–Infeld Action from Dirichlet Sigma Model,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A4, 2767 (1989) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1989

  7. [7]

    Derivative corrections to D-brane actions with constant background fields

    N. Wyllard, “Derivative corrections to D-brane actions with constant background fields,” Nucl. Phys. B598, 247-275 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0008125] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  8. [8]

    One-loop corrections to the D3 brane action

    M. Shmakova, “One loop corrections to the D3-brane action,” Phys. Rev. D62, 104009 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9906239] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  9. [9]

    $(\alpha')^4$ corrections to the N=2 supersymmetric Born-Infeld action

    A. De Giovanni, A. Santambrogio and D. Zanon, “(α’) 4 corrections to the N=2 supersymmet- ric Born–Infeld action,” Phys. Lett. B472, 94-100 (2000) [erratum: Phys. Lett. B478, 457-458 (2000)] [arXiv:hep-th/9907214] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  10. [10]

    Born-Infeld action, supersymmetry and string theory

    A. A. Tseytlin, “Born–Infeld action, supersymmetry and string theory,” The Many Faces of the Superworld, 417-452 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9908105] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  11. [11]

    The non-abelian D-brane effective action through order $\alpha'{}^4$

    P. Koerber and A. Sevrin, “The NonAbelian D-brane effective action through orderα ′4,” JHEP10, 046 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0208044] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  12. [12]

    Higher order contributions to the effective action ofN= 2and4supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories from heat kernel techniques in superspace,

    D. T. Grasso,“Higher order contributions to the effective action ofN= 2and4supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories from heat kernel techniques in superspace,”PhD Thesis, University of Western Australia (2007) [research-repository-uwa]

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz,The Classical Theory of Fields, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1951 (Fourth Revised Edition 1975)

    work page 1951

  14. [14]

    Nonlinear Electrodynamics in General Relativity,

    A. Peres, “Nonlinear Electrodynamics in General Relativity,” Phys. Rev.122, 273-274 (1961) [in- SPIRE]

    work page 1961

  15. [15]

    Non-Linear Electrodynamics—A Study

    J. Pleba´ nski, “Non-Linear Electrodynamics—A Study”, C.I.E.A. del I.P.N., Mexico City (1968). 40

    work page 1968

  16. [16]

    Lectures on Non-linear Electrodynamics

    J. Pleba´ nski, “Lectures on Non-linear Electrodynamics”, NORDITA Lecture Notes, Copenhagen (1970)

    work page 1970

  17. [17]

    Nonlinear electrodynamics - Lagrangians and equations of motion,

    G. Boillat, “Nonlinear electrodynamics - Lagrangians and equations of motion,” J. Math. Phys.11 no.3, 941-951 (1970) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1970

  18. [18]

    Die Grundgleichungen f¨ ur die elektromagnetischen Vorg¨ ange in bewegten K¨ orpern,

    H. Minkowski “Die Grundgleichungen f¨ ur die elektromagnetischen Vorg¨ ange in bewegten K¨ orpern,” Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G¨ ottingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 53-111 (1908)

    work page 1908

  19. [19]

    Introductory Notes on Non-linear Electrodynamics and its Applications,

    D. P. Sorokin, “Introductory Notes on Non-linear Electrodynamics and its Applications,” Fortsch. Phys.70no.7-8, 2200092 (2022) [arXiv:2112.12118] [inSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Electrodynamics in the general relativity theory,

    G. Y. Rainich, “Electrodynamics in the general relativity theory,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc.27no.1, 106-136 (1925) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1925

  21. [21]

    The Conformal Transformations of a Space of Four Dimensions and Their Applications to Geometrical Optics,

    H. Bateman, “The Conformal Transformations of a Space of Four Dimensions and Their Applications to Geometrical Optics,” Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-7no.1, 70-89 (1909) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1909

  22. [22]

    The Transformation of the Electrodynamical Equations,

    H. Bateman, “The Transformation of the Electrodynamical Equations,” Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s 2-8no.1, 223-264 (1910) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1910

  23. [23]

    The Principle of Relativity in Electrodynamics and an Extension Thereof,

    E. Cunningham, “The Principle of Relativity in Electrodynamics and an Extension Thereof,” Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-8no.1, 77-98 (1910) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1910

  24. [24]

    Nonlinear Electrodynamics: Variations on a theme by Born and Infeld

    I. Bialynicki-Birula, “Nonlinear Electrodynamics: Variations on a theme by Born and Infeld”, in Quantum Theory of Particles and Fields, B. Jancewicz and J. Lukierski (Eds.), World Scientific, 1983, pp. 31–48

    work page 1983

  25. [25]

    Electric-Magnetic Duality Rotations in Non-Linear Electrodynamics

    G. W. Gibbons and D. A. Rasheed, “Electric-magnetic duality rotations in nonlinear electrodynam- ics,” Nucl. Phys.B454, 185 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9506035] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  26. [26]

    SL(2,R) Invariance of Non-Linear Electrodynamics Coupled to An Axion and a Dilaton

    G. W. Gibbons and D. A. Rasheed, “SL(2,R) invariance of non-linear electrodynamics coupled to an axion and a dilaton,” Phys. Lett.B365, 46 (1996) [arXiv:hep-th/9509141] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  27. [27]

    Self-Duality in Nonlinear Electromagnetism

    M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino, “Self-duality in nonlinear electromagnetism,” inSupersymmetry and Quantum Field Theory, J. Wess and V. P. Akulov (Eds.), Springer Verlag, 1998, pp. 121– 122 [arXiv:hep-th/9705226] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  28. [28]

    Nonlinear Electromagnetic Self-Duality and Legendre Transformations

    M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino, “Nonlinear electromagnetic self-duality and Legendre transforma- tions,” inDuality and Supersymmetric Theories, D. I. Olive and P. C. West (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 33–48 [hep-th/9712103] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  29. [29]

    Supersymmetric Duality Rotations

    S. M. Kuzenko and S. Theisen, “Supersymmetric duality rotations,” JHEP03, 034 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0001068] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  30. [30]

    Nonlinear Self-Duality and Supersymmetry

    S. M. Kuzenko and S. Theisen, “Nonlinear self-duality and supersymmetry,” Fortsch. Phys.49, 273-309 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0007231] [inSPIRE]. 41

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  31. [31]

    Contributions to Born’s new theory of the electromagnetic field,

    E. Schr¨ odinger, “Contributions to Born’s new theory of the electromagnetic field,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A150no.870, 465-477 (1935) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1935

  32. [32]

    B. P. Kosyakov,Introduction to the classical theory of particles and fields, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg 2005 [inSPIRE]

    work page 2005

  33. [33]

    Conformal invariant vacuum nonlinear electrodynamics,

    V. I. Denisov, E. E. Dolgaya, V. A. Sokolov and I. P. Denisova, “Conformal invariant vacuum nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D96no.3, 036008 (2017) [inSPIRE]

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    ModMax meets Susy,

    I. Bandos, K. Lechner, D. Sorokin and P. K. Townsend, “ModMax meets Susy,” JHEP10, 031 (2021) [arXiv:2106.07547] [inSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    A non-linear duality- invariant conformal extension of Maxwell’s equations,

    I. Bandos, K. Lechner, D. Sorokin and P. K. Townsend, “A non-linear duality-invariant conformal extension of Maxwell’s equations,” Phys. Rev. D102, 121703 (2020) [arXiv:2007.09092] [inSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Nonlinear electrodynamics with the maximum allowable symmetries,

    B. P. Kosyakov, “Nonlinear electrodynamics with the maximum allowable symmetries,” Phys. Lett. B810, 135840 (2020) [arXiv:2007.13878] [inSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    On causality in nonlinear vacuum electrodynamics of the Pleba\'nski class

    G. O. Schellstede, V. Perlick and C. L¨ ammerzahl, “On causality in nonlinear vacuum electrodynamics of the Pleba´ nski class,” Annalen Phys.528no.9-10, 738-749 (2016) [arXiv:1604.02545] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Born again,

    J. G. Russo and P. K. Townsend, “Born again,” SciPost Phys.16no.5, 124 (2024) [arXiv:2401.04167] [inSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Causal self-dual electrodynamics,

    J. G. Russo and P. K. Townsend, “Causal self-dual electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D109no.10, 105023 (2024) [arXiv:2401.06707] [inSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Causality and energy conditions in nonlinear electrodynamics,

    J. G. Russo and P. K. Townsend, “Causality and energy conditions in nonlinear electrodynamics,” JHEP06, 191 (2024) [arXiv:2404.09994] [inSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,

    J. S. Schwinger, “On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,” Phys. Rev.82, 664-679 (1951) [in- SPIRE]

    work page 1951

  42. [42]

    B. S. DeWitt,Dynamical Theory of Groups and Fields, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965

    work page 1965

  43. [43]

    The generalized Schwinger-Dewitt technique in gauge the- ories and quantum gravity,

    A. O. Barvinsky and G. A. Vilkovisky, “The generalized Schwinger-Dewitt technique in gauge the- ories and quantum gravity,” Phys. Rept.119, 1 (1985) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1985

  44. [44]

    I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko,Ideas and Methods of Supersymmetry and Supergravity, Or a Walk Through Superspace, IOP, Bristol, 1995 (Revised Edition 1998) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1995

  45. [45]

    I. G. Avramidi,Heat Kernel and Quantum Gravity, (Lect. Notes Phys. Monogr.64), Springer, 2000

    work page 2000

  46. [46]

    B. S. DeWitt,The Global Approach to Quantum Field Theory. Vol. 1, 2, (Int. Ser. Monogr. Phys. 114), Oxford University Press, 2003

    work page 2003

  47. [47]

    Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual,

    D. V. Vassilevich, “Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual,” Phys. Rept.388, 279 (2003) [arXiv:hep- th/0306138] [inSPIRE]. 42

    work page arXiv 2003

  48. [48]

    New Algorithm for Computing the Coefficients in the Heat Kernel Expansion,

    V. P. Gusynin, “New Algorithm for Computing the Coefficients in the Heat Kernel Expansion,” Phys. Lett. B225, 233-239 (1989) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1989

  49. [49]

    Local heat kernel asymptotics for nonminimal differential opera- tors,

    V. P. Gusynin and E. V. Gorbar, “Local heat kernel asymptotics for nonminimal differential opera- tors,” Phys. Lett. B270, 29-36 (1991) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1991

  50. [50]

    Complete computation of DeWitt-Seeley-Gilkey coef- ficient E(4) for nonminimal operator on curved manifolds,

    V. P. Gusynin and V. V. Kornyak, “Complete computation of DeWitt-Seeley-Gilkey coef- ficient E(4) for nonminimal operator on curved manifolds,” Fund. Appl. Math.5, 649-674 (1999) [arXiv:math/9909145] [inSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 1999

  51. [51]

    Invariants of the heat equation for non-minimal operators

    I. G. Moss and D. J. Toms, “Invariants of the heat equation for non-minimal operators,” J. Phys. A47, 215401 (2014) [arXiv:1311.5445] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  52. [52]

    Heat trace for Laplacian type operators with non-scalar symbols

    B. Iochum and T. Masson, “Heat trace for Laplace type operators with non-scalar symbols,” J. Geom. Phys.116, 90-118 (2017) [arXiv:1607.06070] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Heat asymptotics for nonminimal Laplace type operators and application to noncommutative tori

    B. Iochum and T. Masson, “Heat asymptotics for nonminimal Laplace type operators and application to noncommutative tori,” J. Geom. Phys.129, 1-24 (2018) [arXiv:1707.09657] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Effective actions in supersymmetric gauge theories: heat kernels for non-minimal operators,

    D. T. Grasso and S. M. Kuzenko, “Effective actions in supersymmetric gauge theories: heat kernels for non-minimal operators,” JHEP06, 120 (2023) [arXiv:2302.00957] [inSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Heat kernel expansion for higher order minimal and non- minimal operators,

    A. O. Barvinsky and W. Wachowski, “Heat kernel expansion for higher order minimal and non- minimal operators,” Phys. Rev. D105, 065013 (2022) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D110, 089901 (2024)] [arXiv:2112.03062] [inSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    Schwinger–DeWitt expansion for the heat kernel of nonminimal operators in causal theories,

    A. O. Barvinsky, A. E. Kalugin and W. Wachowski, “Schwinger–DeWitt expansion for the heat kernel of nonminimal operators in causal theories,” Phys. Rev. D112no.7, 076032 (2025) [arXiv:2508.06439] [inSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Heat kernel of nonminimal second-order operators,

    D. Sauro, “Heat kernel of nonminimal second-order operators,” Phys. Rev. D112no.12, 125012 (2025) [arXiv:2508.09017] [inSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Weyl invariance, non-compact duality and conformal higher-derivative sigma models,

    D. T. Grasso, S. M. Kuzenko and J. R. Pinelli, “Weyl invariance, non-compact duality and conformal higher-derivative sigma models,” Eur. Phys. J. C83, 206 (2023) [arXiv:2301.00577] [inSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Feynman diagrams for the Yang-Mills field,

    L. D. Faddeev and V. N. Popov, “Feynman diagrams for the Yang-Mills field,” Phys. Lett. B25, 29 (1967) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1967

  60. [60]

    Heat kernel expansion in the background field formalism,

    A. Barvinsky, “Heat kernel expansion in the background field formalism,” Scholarpedia10(2015) 31644 [inSPIRE]

    work page 2015

  61. [61]

    A ``Gaussian'' Approach to Computing Supersymmetric Effective Actions

    I. N. McArthur and T. D. Gargett, “A ‘Gaussian’ approach to computing supersymmetric effective actions,” Nucl. Phys. B497, 525-540 (1997) [hep-th/9705200] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  62. [62]

    On the background field method beyond one loop: A Man- ifestly covariant derivative expansion in superYang-Mills theories,

    S. M. Kuzenko and I. N. McArthur, “On the background field method beyond one loop: A Man- ifestly covariant derivative expansion in superYang-Mills theories,” JHEP05, 015 (2003) [hep- th/0302205] [inSPIRE]. 43

    work page arXiv 2003

  63. [63]

    Heat kernel techniques for ModMax electrodynamics: A conformal duality-invariant extension of Maxwell electrodynamics,

    J. R. Pinelli,“Heat kernel techniques for ModMax electrodynamics: A conformal duality-invariant extension of Maxwell electrodynamics,”Master’s Thesis, University of Western Australia (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    Local Couplings and Sl(2,R) Invariance for Gauge Theories at One Loop

    H. Osborn, “Local couplings and Sl(2,R) invariance for gauge theories at one loop,” Phys. Lett. B 561(2003) 174 [hep-th/0302119] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  65. [65]

    Quantum Equivalence of Dual Field Theories,

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Quantum Equivalence of Dual Field Theories,” Annals Phys. 162, 31 (1985) [inSPIRE]

    work page 1985

  66. [66]

    On duality symmetry in perturbative quantum theory

    R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin, “On Duality Symmetry in Perturbative Quantum Theory,” JHEP 10, 99 (2012) [arXiv:1205.0176] [inSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  67. [67]

    Higher-derivative deformations of the ModMax theory,

    S. M. Kuzenko and E. S. N. Raptakis, “Higher-derivative deformations of the ModMax theory,” JHEP06, 162 (2024) [arXiv:2404.09108] [inSPIRE]. 44

    work page arXiv 2024