Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Nonlinear Self-Duality and Supersymmetry

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 28 Jul 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We explain why the N = 2 supersymmetric actions proposed so far are not the correct world-volume actions for D3 branes in d = 6.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/0007231 (version 1)
Pith IDMQXXW3XZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationSergei M. Kuzenko, Stefan Theisen (University of Munich). "Nonlinear Self-Duality and Supersymmetry." arXiv:hep-th/0007231 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/MQXXW3XZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,174 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.22 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.53 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We review self-duality of nonlinear electrodynamics and its extension to several Abelian gauge fields coupled to scalars. We then describe self-duality in supersymmetric models, both N = 1 and N = 2. The self-duality equations, which have to be satisfied by the action of any self-dual system, are found and solutions are discussed. One important example is the Born-Infeld action. We explain why the N = 2 supersymmetric actions proposed so far are not the correct world-volume actions for D3 branes in d = 6.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We review self-duality of nonlinear electrodynamics and its extension to several Abelian gauge fields coupled to scalars. background 0.53 0.33 0.06 asserted 0.78
s1 We then describe self-duality in supersymmetric models, both N = 1 and N = 2. contribution 0.92 0.68 0.05 asserted 0.92
s2 The self-duality equations, which have to be satisfied by the action of any self-dual system, are found and solutions are discussed. contribution 0.70 0.74 0.12 asserted 1.00
s3 One important example is the Born-Infeld action. background 0.75 0.11 0.04 asserted 1.00
s4 We explain why the N = 2 supersymmetric actions proposed so far are not the correct world-volume actions for D3 branes in d = 6. result 0.63 0.58 0.34 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.47.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We review self-duality of nonlinear electrodynamics and its extension to several Abelian gauge fields coupled to scalars. We then describe self-duality in supersymmetric models, both N = 1 and N = 2. The self-duality equations, which have to be satisfied by the action of any self-dual system, are found and solutions are discussed. One important example is the Born-Infeld action. We explain why the N = 2 supersymmetric actions proposed so far are not the correct world-volume actions for D3 branes in d = 6.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

53 arXiv papers cite this in 222 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 158 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
Builds on it 6 papers
Uses its method or tool 3 papers
  • [ref] , with a general action S = 1/4∫d^6z W^2 + 1/4∫d^6z̅ W̅^2 + 1/4 ∫d^8z W^2 W^2 Ł( 1/8 D^2 W^2 , 1/8 D̅^2 W^2 )

    Covariant procedures for perturbative non-linear deformation of duality-invariant theories · $N=1$ supersymmetric nonlinear electrodynamics · 0.87

  • To verify duality invariance of the BI-like generalization of ModMax, it is convenient to use, following [ref] , the flat superspace counterparts of the variables [ref]: u:= 𝒟^2 W^2=-8(𝕊-ℙ) , u̅ := 𝒟̅^2 W̅^2=-8(𝕊+ℙ) .

    ModMax meets Susy · Duality invariance · 0.99

  • The implications of this condition are derived in the Appendix, mimicking standard constructions in nonlinear electrodynamics (see, for example, the Appendix in [ref] ).

    Self-dual supersymmetric nonlinear sigma models · Duality invariant sigma models · 0.92

Compares with it 4 papers
Cites it as support 2 papers
Cites it as background 24 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.