pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.20924 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-28 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.stat-mech· quant-ph

Resource-Theoretic Quantifiers of Weak and Strong Symmetry Breaking: Strong Entanglement Asymmetry and Beyond

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 10:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
keywords symmetry breakingresource theoryentanglement asymmetryU(1) symmetryopen quantum systemsmixed statesstrong symmetryquantum field theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

For U(1) symmetry the variance of the conserved quantity fully characterizes asymptotic manipulation of strong symmetry breaking.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a resource theory to quantify strong symmetry breaking in quantum states, which is inequivalent to weak symmetry breaking in mixed-state settings. It defines free states and strong-covariant operations that respect strong symmetry, yielding new quantifiers including a strong entanglement asymmetry. For U(1) symmetries this framework mirrors the structure of entanglement theory, with the variance of the conserved charge determining what asymptotic manipulations are possible. The resulting picture supplies a quantitative way to track irreversible conversion from weak to strong symmetry breaking in open quantum systems.

Core claim

Motivated by the inequivalence of weak and strong symmetries in mixed-state physics, we formulate a resource theory for strong symmetry breaking by identifying free states and strong-covariant operations. For U(1) symmetry the resource theory has a completely parallel structure to the entanglement theory, where the variance of the conserved quantity fully characterizes the asymptotic manipulation of strong symmetry breaking. By connecting this result to the geometry of quantum state space, we obtain a quantitative framework to track how weak symmetry breaking is irreversibly converted into strong symmetry breaking in open quantum systems.

What carries the argument

The resource theory of strong symmetry breaking, defined via strong-covariant operations and free states that are invariant under strong symmetry; for U(1) this reduces asymptotic rates exactly to the variance of the conserved quantity.

If this is right

  • Second-Rényi entanglement asymmetry can increase under symmetric operations and therefore is not a resource monotone.
  • Strong symmetry breaking admits quantifiers for a broad class of symmetry groups, with extensions proposed for generalized symmetries.
  • The framework supplies a quantitative way to track irreversible conversion of weak symmetry breaking into strong symmetry breaking in open quantum systems.
  • Qualitative effects of strong symmetry breaking appear in analytically tractable quantum field theory examples.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same variance characterization may simplify numerical estimates of symmetry-breaking rates in complex many-body states.
  • The conversion tracking could be tested in open-system experiments that prepare states with controlled weak versus strong symmetry.
  • Links to state-space geometry suggest possible bounds on how fast strong symmetry can emerge from weak symmetry under realistic noise.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen strong-covariant operations and free states correctly capture the physical distinction between weak and strong symmetries.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation for a U(1)-symmetric mixed state showing that the asymptotic rate for manipulating strong symmetry breaking is not determined solely by the variance of the conserved charge.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.20924 by Hiroyasu Tajima, Sridip Pal, Yuya Kusuki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Classifications of states. In the figure, asymmetric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic diagram of physical realization of opera [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Dashed blue line denotes the evolution of strong [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dashed blue line denotes the evolution of weak asym [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantifying how much a quantum state breaks a symmetry is essential for characterizing phases, nonequilibrium dynamics, and open-system behavior. Quantum resource theory provides a rigorous operational framework to define and characterize such quantifiers of symmetry-breaking. As a starter, we exemplify the usefulness of resource theory by noting that second-R\'enyi entanglement asymmetry can increase under symmetric operations, and hence is not a resource monotone, and should not solely be used to capture Quantum Mpemba effect. More importantly, motivated by mixed-state physics where weak and strong symmetries are inequivalent, we formulate a new resource theory tailored to strong symmetry, identifying free states and strong-covariant operations. This framework systematically identifies quantifiers of strong symmetry breaking for a broad class of symmetry groups, including a strong entanglement asymmetry. A particularly transparent structure emerges for U(1) symmetry, where the resource theory for the strong symmetry breaking has a completely parallel structure to the entanglement theory: the variance of the conserved quantity fully characterizes the asymptotic manipulation of strong symmetry breaking. By connecting this result to the knowledge of the geometry of quantum state space, we obtain a quantitative framework to track how weak symmetry breaking is irreversibly converted into strong symmetry breaking in open quantum systems. We further propose extensions to generalized symmetries and illustrate the qualitative impact of strong symmetry breaking in analytically tractable QFT examples and applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a resource theory for strong symmetry breaking in quantum systems, motivated by the distinction between weak and strong symmetries in mixed-state physics. It shows that the second Rényi entanglement asymmetry is not a monotone under symmetric operations, defines free states and strong-covariant operations for a broad class of symmetry groups, and establishes a strong entanglement asymmetry quantifier. For U(1) symmetry, the framework parallels entanglement theory, with the variance of the conserved charge serving as the complete asymptotic monotone for state manipulation; this is connected to the geometry of quantum state space to describe irreversible conversion from weak to strong symmetry breaking in open systems, with extensions to generalized symmetries and QFT examples.

Significance. If the central constructions hold, the work supplies an operational, resource-theoretic foundation for distinguishing weak and strong symmetry breaking, with direct implications for nonequilibrium dynamics, open quantum systems, and quantum phases. The U(1) result, by reducing asymptotic convertibility to charge variance and linking to known state-space geometry, offers a quantitative handle on irreversible processes that could be tested in concrete models; the parallel to entanglement theory is a notable strength, as it imports existing asymptotic results without introducing new free parameters.

major comments (2)
  1. [Resource theory formulation] The section introducing strong-covariant operations and free states: the operational distinction between weak and strong symmetries is load-bearing for all subsequent claims, yet the manuscript provides only a high-level motivation from mixed-state physics without a concrete counter-example showing that standard covariant operations fail to capture the strong case.
  2. [U(1) case] U(1) symmetry section on asymptotic manipulation: the claim that variance of the conserved quantity fully characterizes convertibility rates is central, but the derivation appears to rely on an unstated extension of the majorization or convex-roof construction from entanglement theory; an explicit statement of the monotone set and the proof that no additional independent monotones exist is required.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract states that second-Rényi entanglement asymmetry can increase under symmetric operations; a brief numerical example or explicit channel in the main text would make this observation more accessible.
  2. [Definitions] Notation for the strong entanglement asymmetry functional should be introduced with a clear comparison table to the ordinary entanglement asymmetry to avoid reader confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments help clarify key aspects of the resource theory construction. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Resource theory formulation] The section introducing strong-covariant operations and free states: the operational distinction between weak and strong symmetries is load-bearing for all subsequent claims, yet the manuscript provides only a high-level motivation from mixed-state physics without a concrete counter-example showing that standard covariant operations fail to capture the strong case.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit counter-example strengthens the operational motivation. While the distinction is grounded in established mixed-state physics literature, the revised manuscript will include a concrete example in the section on strong-covariant operations: consider a U(1)-symmetric mixed state obtained by depolarizing a coherent state in the charge basis; standard covariant operations preserve the weak symmetry (commuting with the charge operator) but cannot enforce the strong symmetry constraint on the support of the state, whereas strong-covariant operations do. This example will be added with explicit calculations to illustrate the failure of standard operations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [U(1) case] U(1) symmetry section on asymptotic manipulation: the claim that variance of the conserved quantity fully characterizes convertibility rates is central, but the derivation appears to rely on an unstated extension of the majorization or convex-roof construction from entanglement theory; an explicit statement of the monotone set and the proof that no additional independent monotones exist is required.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the asymptotic characterization requires a more explicit derivation. The variance serves as the complete monotone because, for U(1) charges, the majorization relation on the charge distribution reduces to the variance under the convex-roof extension. In the revision, we will add an explicit statement of the monotone set (variance plus subadditive functions that are constant on free states) and a self-contained proof that no additional independent monotones exist for asymptotic rates, adapting the standard majorization arguments from entanglement theory to the charge sector while citing the relevant geometric results on state space. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper defines a resource theory for strong symmetry breaking using standard axioms of quantum resource theories, identifying free states and strong-covariant operations directly from the physical distinction between weak and strong symmetries. For U(1), the variance of the conserved charge emerges as the asymptotic monotone from the structure of the theory itself, paralleling entanglement theory without any reduction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or renamed known results. The connection to quantum state space geometry is invoked as external knowledge, not derived internally. No load-bearing self-citation chains or ansatzes smuggled via prior work are present in the provided framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard axioms of quantum resource theory, the physical inequivalence of weak and strong symmetries in mixed states, and the definition of strong-covariant operations as free operations.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard axioms of quantum resource theory for defining free states and operations
    The paper explicitly builds a new resource theory by identifying free states and strong-covariant operations.
  • domain assumption Weak and strong symmetries are inequivalent in mixed-state physics
    Motivation stated directly in the abstract for formulating the strong symmetry resource theory.
invented entities (1)
  • strong entanglement asymmetry no independent evidence
    purpose: Quantifier of strong symmetry breaking
    New monotone introduced within the strong symmetry resource theory framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5553 in / 1310 out tokens · 42566 ms · 2026-05-16T10:17:31.767347+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Charge Scrambling in Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Long-range Rényi-1 SWSSB order implies extensive block-charge variance for continuous symmetries with rapid asymptotic approach, with conditional counterexamples and a new twist overlap correlator separating symmetry ...

  2. Enhancing entanglement asymmetry in fragmented quantum systems

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Entanglement asymmetry for inhomogeneous U(1) charges in fragmented systems scales extensively, is bounded by a universal fraction of its maximum, and distinguishes classical from quantum fragmentation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 21 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    We take the symmetry group to beG=Z 2 ={e, g}with unitary representation Ue =1, U g =X,(B1) whereXis the Pauli-Xmatrix

    Setup:Z 2 symmetry generated byX Consider a single qubit with Hilbert spaceH ≃C 2. We take the symmetry group to beG=Z 2 ={e, g}with unitary representation Ue =1, U g =X,(B1) whereXis the Pauli-Xmatrix. The corresponding twirling channel is GX(ρ) := 1 2 ρ+XρX .(B2) The second R´ enyi entropy of a stateρis S(2)(ρ) :=−log Tr(ρ 2),(B3) and we define the seco...

  2. [2]

    It is convenient to use the Bloch-sphere representation ρ= 1 2 1+r xX+r yY+r zZ (B9) with Bloch vector⃗ r= (rx, ry, rz) satisfying|⃗ r| ≤1

    Explicit counterexample We now exhibit a stateρsuch that A(2) X ∆Z(ρ) > A(2) X (ρ),(B8) 24 showing thatA (2) X is not a resource monotone. It is convenient to use the Bloch-sphere representation ρ= 1 2 1+r xX+r yY+r zZ (B9) with Bloch vector⃗ r= (rx, ry, rz) satisfying|⃗ r| ≤1. Here, X, Y, Zare the Pauli matrices. In this parametrization, one has Tr(ρ2) =...

  3. [3]

    Tradeoff between extractable mechanical work, accessible entanglement, and ability to act as a reference system, under arbitrary superselection rules

    J.A. Vaccaro, F. Anselmi, H.M. Wiseman and K. Jacobs,Tradeoff between extractable mechanical work, accessible entanglement, and ability to act as a reference system, under arbitrary superselection rules, Phys. Rev. A77(2008) 032114 [quant-ph/0501121]

  4. [4]

    G. Gour, I. Marvian and R.W. Spekkens,Measuring the quality of a quantum reference frame: the relative entropy of frameness,Phys. Rev. A 80, 012307 (2009) 80(2009) 012307 [0901.0943]

  5. [5]

    The resource theory of quantum reference frames: manipulations and monotones

    G. Gour and R.W. Spekkens,The resource theory of quantum reference frames: manipulations and monotones,New Journal of Physics10(2008) 033023 [0711.0043]

  6. [6]

    Marvian,Coherence distillation machines are impossible in quantum thermodynamics,Nature Communications11(2020) 25 [1805.01989]

    I. Marvian,Coherence distillation machines are impossible in quantum thermodynamics,Nature Communications11(2020) 25 [1805.01989]

  7. [7]

    Marvian,Operational Interpretation of Quantum Fisher Information in Quantum Thermodynamics, Physical Review Letters129(2022) 190502 [2112.04694]

    I. Marvian,Operational Interpretation of Quantum Fisher Information in Quantum Thermodynamics, Physical Review Letters129(2022) 190502 [2112.04694]

  8. [8]

    Shitara, Y

    T. Shitara, Y. Mitsuhashi and H. Tajima,The i.i.d. state convertibility in the resource theory of asymmetry for finite groups,2312.15758

  9. [9]

    Quantum geometric tensor determines the iid conversion rate in the resource theory of asymmetry for any compact lie group.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04766, 2024

    K. Yamaguchi, Y. Mitsuhashi, T. Shitara and H. Tajima,Quantum geometric tensor determines the i.i.d. conversion rate in the resource theory of asymmetry for any compact lie group,2411.04766

  10. [10]

    F. Ares, S. Murciano and P. Calabrese,Entanglement asymmetry as a probe of symmetry breaking,Nature Communications 14, 2036 (2023)14(2022) [2207.14693]

  11. [11]

    Murciano, F

    S. Murciano, F. Ares, I. Klich and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry and quantum mpemba effect in the xy spin chain,J. Stat. Mech. (2024) 013103 2024(2023) 013103 [2310.07513]

  12. [12]

    F. Ares, S. Murciano, E. Vernier and P. Calabrese,Lack of symmetry restoration after a quantum quench: an entanglement asymmetry study,SciPost Phys. 15, 089 (2023)15(2023) [2302.03330]

  13. [13]

    Lastres, S

    M. Lastres, S. Murciano, F. Ares and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry in the critical xxz spin chain, J. Stat. Mech. (2025) 0131072025(2024) 013107 [2407.06427]

  14. [14]

    Fossati, C

    M. Fossati, C. Rylands and P. Calabrese,Entanglement asymmetry in cft with boundary symmetry breaking, 2411.10244

  15. [15]

    Kusuki, S

    Y. Kusuki, S. Murciano, H. Ooguri and S. Pal, Entanglement asymmetry and symmetry defects in boundary conformal field theory,JHEP 01 (2025) 057 2025(2024) [2411.09792]

  16. [16]

    Chen and Z.-J

    H.-H. Chen and Z.-J. Tang,Entanglement asymmetry in the hayden-preskill protocol,2411.17695

  17. [17]

    F. Ares, S. Murciano, L. Piroli and P. Calabrese,An entanglement asymmetry study of black hole radiation, Phys. Rev. D 110, L061901 (2024)110(2023) l061901 [2311.12683]

  18. [18]

    Russotto, F

    A. Russotto, F. Ares and P. Calabrese,Non-abelian entanglement asymmetry in random states,JHEP 06 (2025) 1492025(2024) [2411.13337]

  19. [19]

    Capizzi and M

    L. Capizzi and M. Mazzoni,Entanglement asymmetry in the ordered phase of many-body systems: the ising field theory,JHEP 2023, 144 (2023)(2023) [2307.12127]

  20. [20]

    Capizzi and V

    L. Capizzi and V. Vitale,A universal formula for the entanglement asymmetry of matrix product states,J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 45LT01 202457(2023) 45LT01 [2310.01962]

  21. [21]

    Fossati, F

    M. Fossati, F. Ares, J. Dubail and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry in cft and its relation to non-topological defects,JHEP 2024, 59 (2024)2024 (2024) [2402.03446]

  22. [22]

    Chen and H.-H

    M. Chen and H.-H. Chen,R´ enyi entanglement asymmetry in 1+1-dimensional conformal field theories, 2310.15480

  23. [23]

    Entanglement asymmetry in gauge theories: chiral anomaly in the finite temperature massless Schwinger model,

    A. Florio and S. Murciano,Entanglement asymmetry in gauge theories: chiral anomaly in the finite temperature massless Schwinger model,2511.01966

  24. [24]

    Benini, V

    F. Benini, V. Godet and A.H. Singh,Entanglement asymmetry in conformal field theory and holography, PTEP2025(2025) 6 [2407.07969]

  25. [25]

    F. Ares, V. Vitale and S. Murciano,The quantum mpemba effect in free-fermionic mixed states,Phys. Rev. B 111, 104312 (2025)111(2024) 104312 [2405.08913]

  26. [26]

    Rylands, K

    C. Rylands, K. Klobas, F. Ares, P. Calabrese, S. Murciano and B. Bertini,Microscopic origin of the quantum mpemba effect in integrable systems,Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 010401 (2024)133(2023) 010401 [2310.04419]

  27. [27]

    Yamashika, F

    S. Yamashika, F. Ares and P. Calabrese,Entanglement asymmetry and quantum mpemba effect in two-dimensional free-fermion systems,Phys. Rev. B 110, 085126 (2024)110(2024) 085126 [2403.04486]

  28. [28]

    Turkeshi, P

    X. Turkeshi, P. Calabrese and A. De Luca,Quantum mpemba effect in random circuits,2405.14514

  29. [29]

    Liu, H.-K

    S. Liu, H.-K. Zhang, S. Yin and S.-X. Zhang,Symmetry restoration and quantum mpemba effect in symmetric random circuits,Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 140405 (2024) 133(2024) 140405 [2403.08459]

  30. [30]

    Liu, H.-K

    S. Liu, H.-K. Zhang, S. Yin, S.-X. Zhang and H. Yao, Quantum mpemba effects in many-body localization systems,Science Bulletin 70 (23), 3991-3996 (2025)70 (2024) 3991 [2408.07750]

  31. [31]

    Chalas, F

    K. Chalas, F. Ares, C. Rylands and P. Calabrese, Multiple crossing during dynamical symmetry restoration and implications for the quantum mpemba effect,J. Stat. Mech. (2024) 1031012024(2024) 103101 [2405.04436]

  32. [32]

    Caceffo, S

    F. Caceffo, S. Murciano and V. Alba,Entangled multiplets, asymmetry, and quantum mpemba effect in dissipative systems,J. Stat. Mech. (2024) 0631032024 (2024) 063103 [2402.02918]

  33. [33]

    Rylands, E

    C. Rylands, E. Vernier and P. Calabrese,Dynamical symmetry restoration in the heisenberg spin chain, 2409.08735

  34. [34]

    Yamashika, P

    S. Yamashika, P. Calabrese and F. Ares,Quenching from superfluid to free bosons in two dimensions: entanglement, symmetries, and quantum mpemba effect, Physical Review A111(2024) 043304 [2410.14299]

  35. [35]

    Joshi, J

    L.K. Joshi, J. Franke, A. Rath, F. Ares, S. Murciano, F. Kranzl et al.,Observing the quantum mpemba effect in quantum simulations,Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 010402, 2024(2024) [2401.04270]

  36. [36]

    Di Giulio, X

    G. Di Giulio, X. Turkeshi and S. Murciano, 27 Measurement-Induced Symmetry Restoration and Quantum Mpemba Effect,Entropy27(2025) 407 [2502.19506]

  37. [37]

    F. Ares, P. Calabrese and S. Murciano,The quantum Mpemba effects,Nature Rev. Phys.7(2025) 451 [2502.08087]

  38. [38]

    Summer, M

    A. Summer, M. Moroder, L.P. Bettmann, X. Turkeshi, I. Marvian and J. Goold,A resource theoretical unification of Mpemba effects: classical and quantum, 2507.16976

  39. [39]

    Mpemba effects in quantum complexity,

    S. Aditya, A. Summer, P. Sierant and X. Turkeshi, Mpemba Effects in Quantum Complexity,2509.22176

  40. [40]

    Mazzoni, L

    M. Mazzoni, L. Capizzi and L. Piroli,Breaking global symmetries with locality-preserving operations, 2508.15892

  41. [41]

    Yamashika, S

    S. Yamashika, S. Endo and H. Tajima,Quantum fisher information as a measure of symmetry breaking in quantum many-body systems,2509.07468

  42. [42]

    A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains

    B. Buca and T. Prosen,A note on symmetry reductions of the lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains,New Journal of Physics 14 (2012) 073007 14(2012) 073007 [1203.0943]

  43. [43]

    de Groot, A

    C. de Groot, A. Turzillo and N. Schuch,Symmetry protected topological order in open quantum systems, Quantum 6, 856 (2022)6(2021) 856 [2112.04483]

  44. [44]

    Ma and C

    R. Ma and C. Wang,Average symmetry-protected topological phases,Phys. Rev. X 13, 031016 (2023)13 (2022) 031016 [2209.02723]

  45. [45]

    Symmetry protected topological phases under deco- herence,

    J.Y. Lee, Y.-Z. You and C. Xu,Symmetry protected topological phases under decoherence,Quantum 9, 1607 (2025)9(2022) 1607 [2210.16323]

  46. [46]

    Zhang, Y

    J.-H. Zhang, Y. Qi and Z. Bi,Fidelity strange correlators for average symmetry-protected topological phases,2210.17485

  47. [47]

    Quantum criti- cality under decoherence or weak measurement

    J.Y. Lee, C.-M. Jian and C. Xu,Quantum criticality under decoherence or weak measurement,2301.05238

  48. [48]

    Unifying Emergent Hydrodynamics and Lindbladian Low-Energy Spectra across Symme- tries, Constraints, and Long-Range Interactions,

    O. Ogunnaike, J. Feldmeier and J.Y. Lee,Unifying emergent hydrodynamics and lindbladian low energy spectra across symmetries, constraints, and long-range interactions,2304.13028

  49. [49]

    Ma, J.-H

    R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng and C. Wang, Topological phases with average symmetries: the decohered, the disordered, and the intrinsic,Phys. Rev. X 15, 021062 (2025)15(2023) 021062 [2305.16399]

  50. [50]

    Lessa, R

    L.A. Lessa, R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng and C. Wang,Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking in mixed quantum states,PRX Quantum6 (2025) 010344 [2405.03639]

  51. [51]

    P. Sala, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Oshikawa and Y. You, Spontaneous strong symmetry breaking in open systems: Purification perspective,Phys. Rev. B110(2024) 155150 [2405.02402]

  52. [52]

    Concentrating Partial Entanglement by Local Operations

    C.H. Bennett, H.J. Bernstein, S. Popescu and B. Schumacher,Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations,Phys.Rev.A53:2046-2052,199653 (1995) 2046 [quant-ph/9511030]

  53. [53]

    Marvian Mashhad,Symmetry, Asymmetry and Quantum Information, Ph.D

    I. Marvian Mashhad,Symmetry, Asymmetry and Quantum Information, Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo, Sept., 2012

  54. [54]

    The theory of manipulations of pure state asymmetry: basic tools and equivalence classes of states under symmetric operations

    I. Marvian and R.W. Spekkens,The theory of manipulations of pure state asymmetry: I. Basic tools, equivalence classes and single copy transformations, New Journal of Physics15(2013) 033001 [1104.0018]

  55. [55]

    From clocks to cloners: Catalytic transformations under covariant operations and recoverability

    I. Marvian and S. Lloyd,From clocks to cloners: Catalytic transformations under covariant operations and recoverability, Aug., 2016. 10.48550/ARXIV.1608.07325

  56. [56]

    Helstrom,Quantum detection and estimation theory,Journal of Statistical Physics1(1969) 231

    C.W. Helstrom,Quantum detection and estimation theory,Journal of Statistical Physics1(1969) 231

  57. [57]

    Metric adjusted skew information

    F. Hansen,Metric adjusted skew information, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences105 (2008) 9909 [math-ph/0607049]

  58. [58]

    Yadin and V

    B. Yadin and V. Vedral,General framework for quantum macroscopicity in terms of coherence,Phys. Rev. A93(2016) 022122

  59. [59]

    Yamaguchi and H

    K. Yamaguchi and H. Tajima,Beyond i.i.d. in the resource theory of asymmetry: An information-spectrum approach for quantum fisher information,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 200203 [2204.08439]

  60. [60]

    Yamaguchi and H

    K. Yamaguchi and H. Tajima,Smooth Metric Adjusted Skew Information Rates,Quantum7(2023) 1012 [2211.12522]

  61. [61]

    Provost and G

    J.P. Provost and G. Vallee,Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states,Communications in Mathematical Physics76(1980) 289

  62. [62]

    Berry,The quantum phase, five years after, in Geometric Phases in Physics, vol

    M.V. Berry,The quantum phase, five years after, in Geometric Phases in Physics, vol. 5, pp. 3–28, World Scientific Singapore (1989)

  63. [63]

    Kudo and H

    D. Kudo and H. Tajima,Fisher information matrix as a resource measure in resource theory of asymmetry with general connected lie group symmetry,Physical Review A107(2022) 062418 [2205.03245]

  64. [64]

    Ferro, F

    F. Ferro, F. Ares and P. Calabrese,Non-equilibrium entanglement asymmetry for discrete groups: the example of the xy spin chain,J. Stat. Mech. (2024) 0231012024(2023) 023101 [2307.06902]

  65. [65]

    Fujimura and S

    H. Fujimura and S. Shimamori,Entanglement Asymmetry and Quantum Mpemba Effect for Non-Abelian Global Symmetry,2509.05597

  66. [66]

    Zapusek, K

    E. Zapusek, K. Kirova, W. Hahn, M. Marthaler and F. Reiter,Variational quantum thermalizers based on weakly-symmetric nonunitary multi-qubit operations, Quantum Science and Technology(2025) [2502.09698]

  67. [67]

    Quantum Fisher Information as the Convex Roof of Variance

    S. Yu,Quantum fisher information as the convex roof of variance, Feb., 2013. 10.48550/ARXIV.1302.5311

  68. [68]

    Uncertainty Principle and Quantum Fisher Information - II

    P. Gibilisco, D. Imparato and T. Isola,Uncertainty principle and quantum fisher information. ii.,Journal of mathematical physics48(2007) [math-ph/0701062]

  69. [69]

    Gibilisco and T

    P. Gibilisco and T. Isola,On a refinement of heisenberg uncertainty relation by means of quantum fisher information,Journal of mathematical analysis and applications375(2011) 270

  70. [70]

    Ali Ahmad, M

    S.A. Ahmad, M.S. Klinger and Y. Wang,The many faces of non-invertible symmetries,2509.18072

  71. [71]

    Benini, P

    F. Benini, P. Calabrese, M. Fossati, A.H. Singh and M. Venuti,Entanglement asymmetry for higher and noninvertible symmetries,2509.16311

  72. [72]

    Kusuki, S

    Y. Kusuki, S. Murciano, H. Ooguri and S. Pal, Symmetry-resolved entanglement entropy, spectra & boundary conformal field theory,JHEP 2023, 216 (2023)2023(2023) [2309.03287]

  73. [73]

    Quantum quenches in 1+1 dimensional conformal field theories

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy,Quantum quenches in 1+1 dimensional conformal field theories,J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 0640032016(2016) 064003 [1603.02889]

  74. [74]

    Boundary Conformal Field Theory

    J. Cardy,Boundary conformal field theory,Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, (Elsevier, 2006)(2004) [hep-th/0411189]

  75. [75]

    Benjamin, J

    N. Benjamin, J. Lee, S. Pal, D. Simmons-Duffin and 28 Y. Xu,Angular fractals in thermal QFT,JHEP11 (2024) 134 [2405.17562]

  76. [76]

    Constraints on Fluid Dynamics from Equilibrium Partition Functions

    N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Jain, S. Minwalla and T. Sharma,Constraints on Fluid Dynamics from Equilibrium Partition Functions, JHEP09(2012) 046 [1203.3544]

  77. [77]

    Large rotating AdS black holes from fluid mechanics

    S. Bhattacharyya, S. Lahiri, R. Loganayagam and S. Minwalla,Large rotating AdS black holes from fluid mechanics,JHEP09(2008) 054 [0708.1770]

  78. [78]

    Towards hydrodynamics without an entropy current

    K. Jensen, M. Kaminski, P. Kovtun, R. Meyer, A. Ritz and A. Yarom,Towards hydrodynamics without an entropy current,Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 101601 [1203.3556]

  79. [79]

    Benjamin, J

    N. Benjamin, J. Lee, H. Ooguri and D. Simmons-Duffin, Universal asymptotics for high energy CFT data,JHEP 03(2024) 115 [2306.08031]

  80. [80]

    Constraints on the second order transport coefficients of an uncharged fluid

    S. Bhattacharyya,Constraints on the second order transport coefficients of an uncharged fluid,JHEP07 (2012) 104 [1201.4654]

Showing first 80 references.