Temperature as a Dynamically Maintained Steady State: Photonic Mechanisms, Maintenance Cost, and the Limits of the Infinite-Reservoir Idealization

David Vaknin

arxiv: 2601.22247 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-29 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech

Temperature as a Dynamically Maintained Steady State: Photonic Mechanisms, Maintenance Cost, and the Limits of the Infinite-Reservoir Idealization

David Vaknin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 09:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

keywords temperaturesteady statephoton exchangePlanck distributionradiative coolingthermodynamic equilibriuminfinite reservoir

0 comments

The pith

Any system at finite temperature must continuously absorb photons averaging 2.701 E_c to offset radiative losses and sustain its temperature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that temperature is not a passive state variable from an infinite reservoir but a dynamically sustained steady state maintained by ongoing photon exchange. It derives that sustaining a Planck distribution requires photons with average energy π⁴ E_c / [30 ζ(3)] ≈ 2.701 E_c, quantifying the throughput any real system of charged particles must provide against cooling. This picture reconciles the Maxwell velocity distribution, which gives the shape at fixed E_c, with the need to establish and hold that energy scale through radiation. Finite reservoirs themselves sit in a hierarchy of photon-maintained systems from samples to stars, with the infinite reservoir as only the large-capacity limit. Readers would care because the account supplies a quantum-electrodynamic mechanism for thermodynamic equilibrium without changing its predictions.

Core claim

To sustain a Planck distribution at characteristic energy E_c = k_B T, the average photon energy must be ⟨hν⟩ = π⁴ E_c / [30 ζ(3)] ≈ 2.701 E_c. This value measures the continuous energetic input required to compensate radiative losses in any real system. The Maxwell velocity distribution correctly describes particle speeds at a given E_c but cannot account for how that scale is maintained. Every finite thermal reservoir is itself kept by photon exchange at a larger scale, so the classical infinite reservoir emerges only as the high-capacity limit within a natural hierarchy of systems.

What carries the argument

The average photon energy ⟨hν⟩ = π⁴ E_c / [30 ζ(3)] ≈ 2.701 E_c required to sustain the Planck distribution against radiative cooling.

If this is right

The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution gives the shape of velocities at fixed E_c but not the mechanism that sets or sustains that energy against losses.
Thermal reservoirs form a hierarchy in which each finite one is maintained by photon exchange with a larger-scale reservoir, extending to planetary and stellar systems.
Thermodynamic entropy S = k_B ln W uses k_B solely to fix units (J/K) rather than adding new statistical content.
Thermodynamics remains unchanged but gains a mechanistic interpretation in terms of quantum electrodynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

In small or isolated quantum systems the radiative maintenance cost may become measurable and require explicit compensation even when classical reservoirs appear sufficient.
Thermodynamic cycles or engines realized with finite reservoirs could show efficiency limits traceable to the photon throughput needed to hold temperature.
The steady-state view aligns temperature maintenance with other flux-driven steady states in non-equilibrium thermodynamics.

Load-bearing premise

Any system of charged particles at finite temperature continuously emits thermal radiation and cools unless compensated by energy input.

What would settle it

A laboratory measurement of the average energy of photons exchanged to hold a blackbody spectrum at known E_c that deviates from 2.701 E_c would falsify the derived maintenance cost.

read the original abstract

Classical thermodynamics treats temperature as a state variable characterizing systems in equilibrium with idealized infinite reservoirs. We argue that this framing, while computationally exact, obscures an essential physical reality: any system at finite characteristic energy $E_c = k_B T$ continuously emits thermal radiation and cools unless energy input compensates these losses. What thermodynamics calls ``thermal equilibrium'' is, at the microscopic level, a dynamically sustained steady state maintained by continuous photon exchange. We derive that the average photon energy required to sustain a Planck distribution is $\langle h\nu \rangle = \pi^4 E_c/[30\,\zeta(3)] \approx 2.701\,E_c$, quantifying the energetic throughput that any real system must sustain to maintain a given temperature. We resolve the apparent contradiction with the purely mechanical Maxwell velocity distribution: billiard-ball kinetics correctly describe the \emph{shape} of the distribution at a given $E_c$, but cannot account for how $E_c$ is established or maintained against radiative losses in any real system of charged particles. We further show that every finite thermal reservoir is itself maintained by photon exchange at a larger scale, organizing physical systems into a natural hierarchy from individual samples through cryostats, laboratories, and planetary surfaces to stellar interiors, with the classical infinite reservoir emerging as the large-capacity limit within that hierarchy rather than a fundamental physical entity. We also comment on the relation between thermodynamic entropy $S = k_B \ln W$ and the dimensionless entropy $\mathcal{S} = \ln W$, emphasizing that $k_B$ primarily fixes units (J/K) rather than introducing new statistical content. These results do not modify thermodynamics but provide its mechanistic interpretation in terms of quantum electrodynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper recasts the textbook mean photon energy from the Planck spectrum as a maintenance cost for temperature but introduces no new derivation or testable claim.

read the letter

The central result here is the familiar average photon energy of roughly 2.701 E_c obtained by dividing the usual energy-density integral by the number-density integral over the blackbody spectrum. The paper presents this number as the energetic throughput any real system must supply to hold temperature against radiative losses. That framing is the main point the authors want to make. The hierarchy of reservoirs they sketch, from lab samples through cryostats and planetary surfaces up to stellar interiors, is a straightforward way to show how the infinite-reservoir idealization arises as a large-capacity limit rather than a fundamental entity. The distinction between the Maxwell distribution fixing the shape at a given E_c and the photon bath fixing the value of E_c itself is also drawn cleanly. These points are useful reminders for anyone who teaches or thinks about the physical content of equilibrium statistical mechanics. The calculation itself, however, does not depart from standard quantum statistics. The paper starts from the Planck distribution and recovers the known mean energy; it does not derive the spectrum from the steady-state premise or supply independent checks. The maintenance-cost language therefore functions as a re-labeling rather than an independent derivation. No new predictions appear, and the abstract gives no indication of numerical simulations or comparisons with measured radiative losses in finite systems. This work is for readers already interested in the foundations of thermodynamics and quantum optics. It will not alter how anyone computes partition functions or heat capacities, but the reservoir-hierarchy picture may be worth citing in a review or a pedagogical paper. I would send it to peer review. The physics is consistent with established results and the writing is direct, so referees can assess whether the interpretive layer adds enough to justify publication.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that temperature is not merely a thermodynamic state variable but a dynamically maintained steady state sustained by continuous photon emission and absorption to counteract radiative cooling. It presents a derivation of the average photon energy required to sustain a Planck distribution, given by ⟨hν⟩ = π⁴ E_c / [30 ζ(3)] ≈ 2.701 E_c with E_c = k_B T, organizes physical systems into a hierarchy of finite reservoirs, resolves an apparent tension with the Maxwell velocity distribution, and comments on the unit-fixing role of k_B in the entropy formula S = k_B ln W.

Significance. The quantitative result is the standard textbook mean photon energy obtained from the ratio of the energy-density and number-density integrals over the Planck spectrum. If the interpretive framework is accepted, the paper supplies a mechanistic picture linking classical thermodynamics to quantum electrodynamics via photon exchange and usefully frames the infinite-reservoir idealization as a limiting case within a hierarchy of finite systems. No new physical predictions or modifications to thermodynamic relations are introduced.

major comments (1)

Abstract and the paragraph containing the claimed derivation: the expression ⟨hν⟩ = π⁴ E_c / [30 ζ(3)] is obtained exactly by dividing the standard blackbody energy-density integral by the number-density integral; because the Planck spectrum is taken as given, the result is a re-expression of the input distribution rather than an independent calculation of a maintenance cost. This weakens the central claim that the formula quantifies a dynamically required energetic throughput beyond conventional radiative equilibrium.

minor comments (2)

The discussion of the Maxwell velocity distribution versus radiative maintenance should explicitly reference the standard separation between kinematic shape and energy-scale setting in statistical mechanics texts.
The entropy paragraph would benefit from a brief citation to conventional treatments (e.g., the role of k_B as a dimensional constant) to avoid any impression that the distinction is novel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for placing our quantitative result in the context of standard blackbody integrals. We address the single major comment below and propose a targeted clarification.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract and the paragraph containing the claimed derivation: the expression ⟨hν⟩ = π⁴ E_c / [30 ζ(3)] is obtained exactly by dividing the standard blackbody energy-density integral by the number-density integral; because the Planck spectrum is taken as given, the result is a re-expression of the input distribution rather than an independent calculation of a maintenance cost. This weakens the central claim that the formula quantifies a dynamically required energetic throughput beyond conventional radiative equilibrium.

Authors: We agree that the numerical prefactor is obtained by dividing the standard energy-density and number-density integrals over the Planck spectrum; no new spectral calculation is performed. Our central claim, however, is interpretive rather than computational: once the Planck distribution is accepted, the resulting average photon energy ⟨hν⟩ ≈ 2.701 E_c directly gives the energetic throughput per photon that must be supplied to offset radiative losses and maintain the distribution against cooling in any finite system. Conventional treatments do not frame this average as an explicit maintenance cost within a hierarchy of finite reservoirs. We will revise the abstract and the relevant paragraph to state explicitly that the result is a re-expression of the Planck spectrum whose physical significance lies in the dynamical steady-state interpretation, without asserting an independent derivation beyond the input distribution. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Maintenance cost is the standard mean photon energy of the Planck spectrum by construction

specific steps

self definitional [Abstract]
"We derive that the average photon energy required to sustain a Planck distribution is ⟨hν⟩ = π⁴ E_c/[30 ζ(3)] ≈ 2.701 E_c, quantifying the energetic throughput that any real system must sustain to maintain a given temperature."

The quoted expression is obtained by dividing the energy-density integral by the photon-number-density integral over the Planck spectrum at characteristic energy E_c. Because the Planck distribution is the input assumption that defines the thermal state at temperature T = E_c/k_B, the mean energy per photon is identical to the claimed 'required to sustain' quantity by construction; no independent mechanism is derived.

full rationale

The paper's central claim computes the average photon energy from the Planck distribution at temperature T = E_c/k_B and presents the result as the energetic throughput required to sustain that same distribution. This is the textbook ratio of energy-density to number-density integrals, which is defined by the assumed spectrum; the 'maintenance cost' label therefore adds no independent content. The interpretive step that temperature is a dynamically maintained steady state follows directly from the steady-state balance assumption without additional derivation. This is a self-definitional reduction rather than a prediction from new premises.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Planck blackbody spectrum and the assumption of radiative losses in charged-particle systems. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced; the numerical factor follows from known values of π and the Riemann zeta function at 3.

axioms (2)

standard math Planck's law for the blackbody radiation spectrum
Invoked to compute the average photon energy from the distribution integrals.
domain assumption Finite systems at temperature E_c emit thermal radiation and require compensatory energy input to maintain steady state
Core premise stated in the abstract for the dynamic-maintenance argument.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5622 in / 1468 out tokens · 53967 ms · 2026-05-16T09:18:11.219872+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

[1]

Acryogenic sampleat 4 K sits in passive steady state with its cryostat walls, exchanging matched- Ec photons with negligible net energy flow

work page
[2]

Without electrical power, the cryostat warms on a timescale of hours [19]

Thecryostatat 4 K is actively maintained by a refrigerator continuously pumping heat against the leak from the 300 K laboratory environment. Without electrical power, the cryostat warms on a timescale of hours [19]

work page
[3]

Thelaboratoryat∼300 K is maintained by HVAC systems balancing solar gain, equipment dis- sipation, and occupant heat loads against losses to the outdoor environment. 5

work page
[4]

This is not a static property of Earth; it is the current balance of a dynamic ex- change

Theplanetary surfaceat∼288 K is a dy- namic steady state between absorbed solar radia- tion (∼240 W m −2 globally averaged) and emitted infrared radiation. This is not a static property of Earth; it is the current balance of a dynamic ex- change. Perturbing the balance — as by increasing atmospheric absorbers — shiftsE c [20]

work page
[5]

Thermal equilibrium

Thesolar photosphereat∼5778 K is maintained by nuclear fusion in the core. Without fusion, the Sun would cool on a Kelvin-Helmholtz timescale of ∼15 million years. Each level appears as an effective infinite reservoir to the levels within it, because the timescale for signifi- cantE c change at that level vastly exceeds experimental timescales at the leve...

work page
[6]

H. B. Callen,Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1985)

work page 1985
[7]

Fermi,Thermodynamics(Dover, New York, 1956)

E. Fermi,Thermodynamics(Dover, New York, 1956)

work page 1956
[8]

E. T. Jaynes, Information theory and statistical mechan- ics, Phys. Rev.106, 620 (1957)

work page 1957
[9]

J. W. Gibbs,Elementary Principles in Statistical Me- chanics(Yale University Press, New Haven, 1902)

work page 1902
[10]

J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1999)

work page 1999
[11]

Einstein, Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung, Phys

A. Einstein, Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung, Phys. Z. 18, 121 (1917)

work page 1917
[12]

Cohen-Tannoudji, B

C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Lalo¨ e,Quantum Me- chanics(Wiley, New York, 1977)

work page 1977
[13]

P. W. Milonni,The Quantum Vacuum(Academic Press, San Diego, 1994)

work page 1994
[14]

M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy,Quantum Optics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

work page 1997
[15]

Boltzmann, Weitere Studien ¨ uber das W¨ armegleichgewicht unter Gasmolek¨ ulen, Wien

L. Boltzmann, Weitere Studien ¨ uber das W¨ armegleichgewicht unter Gasmolek¨ ulen, Wien. Ber.66, 275 (1872)

work page
[16]

Planck, Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum, Ann

M. Planck, Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum, Ann. Phys.309, 553 (1901)

work page 1901
[17]

R. K. Pathria and P. D. Beale,Statistical Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Academic Press, Oxford, 2011)

work page 2011
[18]

Reif,Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965)

F. Reif,Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965)

work page 1965
[19]

Wien, ¨Uber die Energievertheilung im Emissionsspec- trum eines schwarzen K¨ orpers, Ann

W. Wien, ¨Uber die Energievertheilung im Emissionsspec- trum eines schwarzen K¨ orpers, Ann. Phys.294, 662 (1896)

work page
[20]

R. W. Boyd,Nonlinear Optics, 3rd ed. (Academic Press, Burlington, 2008)

work page 2008
[21]

J. L. Lebowitz, Boltzmann’s entropy and time’s arrow, Phys. Today46(9), 32 (1993)

work page 1993
[22]

Boltzmann, ¨Uber die Beziehung zwischen dem zweiten Hauptsatze des mechanischen W¨ armetheorie und der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Wien

L. Boltzmann, ¨Uber die Beziehung zwischen dem zweiten Hauptsatze des mechanischen W¨ armetheorie und der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Wien. Ber.76, 373 (1877)

work page
[23]

C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communica- tion, Bell Syst. Tech. J.27, 379 (1948)

work page 1948
[24]

Pobell,Matter and Methods at Low Temperatures, 3rd ed

F. Pobell,Matter and Methods at Low Temperatures, 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2007)

work page 2007
[25]

D. L. Hartmann,Global Physical Climatology(Academic Press, San Diego, 1994)

work page 1994
[26]

Goldstein, J

S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zangh` ı, Canonical typicality, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 050403 (2006)

work page 2006
[27]

Popescu, A

S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics, Nat. Phys. 2, 754 (2006)

work page 2006
[28]

Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy dif- ferences, Phys

C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy dif- ferences, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2690 (1997)

work page 1997
[29]

G. E. Crooks, Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy dif- ferences, Phys. Rev. E60, 2721 (1999)

work page 1999
[30]

Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Rep

U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Rep. Prog. Phys.75, 126001 (2012)

work page 2012
[31]

Esposito, U

M. Esposito, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Nonequi- librium fluctuations, fluctuation theorems, and counting statistics in quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1665 (2009)

work page 2009
[32]

Campisi, P

M. Campisi, P. H¨ anggi, and P. Talkner, Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 771 (2011)

work page 2011

[1] [1]

Acryogenic sampleat 4 K sits in passive steady state with its cryostat walls, exchanging matched- Ec photons with negligible net energy flow

work page

[2] [2]

Without electrical power, the cryostat warms on a timescale of hours [19]

Thecryostatat 4 K is actively maintained by a refrigerator continuously pumping heat against the leak from the 300 K laboratory environment. Without electrical power, the cryostat warms on a timescale of hours [19]

work page

[3] [3]

Thelaboratoryat∼300 K is maintained by HVAC systems balancing solar gain, equipment dis- sipation, and occupant heat loads against losses to the outdoor environment. 5

work page

[4] [4]

This is not a static property of Earth; it is the current balance of a dynamic ex- change

Theplanetary surfaceat∼288 K is a dy- namic steady state between absorbed solar radia- tion (∼240 W m −2 globally averaged) and emitted infrared radiation. This is not a static property of Earth; it is the current balance of a dynamic ex- change. Perturbing the balance — as by increasing atmospheric absorbers — shiftsE c [20]

work page

[5] [5]

Thermal equilibrium

Thesolar photosphereat∼5778 K is maintained by nuclear fusion in the core. Without fusion, the Sun would cool on a Kelvin-Helmholtz timescale of ∼15 million years. Each level appears as an effective infinite reservoir to the levels within it, because the timescale for signifi- cantE c change at that level vastly exceeds experimental timescales at the leve...

work page

[6] [6]

H. B. Callen,Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1985)

work page 1985

[7] [7]

Fermi,Thermodynamics(Dover, New York, 1956)

E. Fermi,Thermodynamics(Dover, New York, 1956)

work page 1956

[8] [8]

E. T. Jaynes, Information theory and statistical mechan- ics, Phys. Rev.106, 620 (1957)

work page 1957

[9] [9]

J. W. Gibbs,Elementary Principles in Statistical Me- chanics(Yale University Press, New Haven, 1902)

work page 1902

[10] [10]

J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1999)

work page 1999

[11] [11]

Einstein, Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung, Phys

A. Einstein, Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung, Phys. Z. 18, 121 (1917)

work page 1917

[12] [12]

Cohen-Tannoudji, B

C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Lalo¨ e,Quantum Me- chanics(Wiley, New York, 1977)

work page 1977

[13] [13]

P. W. Milonni,The Quantum Vacuum(Academic Press, San Diego, 1994)

work page 1994

[14] [14]

M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy,Quantum Optics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

work page 1997

[15] [15]

Boltzmann, Weitere Studien ¨ uber das W¨ armegleichgewicht unter Gasmolek¨ ulen, Wien

L. Boltzmann, Weitere Studien ¨ uber das W¨ armegleichgewicht unter Gasmolek¨ ulen, Wien. Ber.66, 275 (1872)

work page

[16] [16]

Planck, Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum, Ann

M. Planck, Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum, Ann. Phys.309, 553 (1901)

work page 1901

[17] [17]

R. K. Pathria and P. D. Beale,Statistical Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Academic Press, Oxford, 2011)

work page 2011

[18] [18]

Reif,Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965)

F. Reif,Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965)

work page 1965

[19] [19]

Wien, ¨Uber die Energievertheilung im Emissionsspec- trum eines schwarzen K¨ orpers, Ann

W. Wien, ¨Uber die Energievertheilung im Emissionsspec- trum eines schwarzen K¨ orpers, Ann. Phys.294, 662 (1896)

work page

[20] [20]

R. W. Boyd,Nonlinear Optics, 3rd ed. (Academic Press, Burlington, 2008)

work page 2008

[21] [21]

J. L. Lebowitz, Boltzmann’s entropy and time’s arrow, Phys. Today46(9), 32 (1993)

work page 1993

[22] [22]

Boltzmann, ¨Uber die Beziehung zwischen dem zweiten Hauptsatze des mechanischen W¨ armetheorie und der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Wien

L. Boltzmann, ¨Uber die Beziehung zwischen dem zweiten Hauptsatze des mechanischen W¨ armetheorie und der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Wien. Ber.76, 373 (1877)

work page

[23] [23]

C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communica- tion, Bell Syst. Tech. J.27, 379 (1948)

work page 1948

[24] [24]

Pobell,Matter and Methods at Low Temperatures, 3rd ed

F. Pobell,Matter and Methods at Low Temperatures, 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2007)

work page 2007

[25] [25]

D. L. Hartmann,Global Physical Climatology(Academic Press, San Diego, 1994)

work page 1994

[26] [26]

Goldstein, J

S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zangh` ı, Canonical typicality, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 050403 (2006)

work page 2006

[27] [27]

Popescu, A

S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics, Nat. Phys. 2, 754 (2006)

work page 2006

[28] [28]

Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy dif- ferences, Phys

C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy dif- ferences, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2690 (1997)

work page 1997

[29] [29]

G. E. Crooks, Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy dif- ferences, Phys. Rev. E60, 2721 (1999)

work page 1999

[30] [30]

Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Rep

U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Rep. Prog. Phys.75, 126001 (2012)

work page 2012

[31] [31]

Esposito, U

M. Esposito, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Nonequi- librium fluctuations, fluctuation theorems, and counting statistics in quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1665 (2009)

work page 2009

[32] [32]

Campisi, P

M. Campisi, P. H¨ anggi, and P. Talkner, Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 771 (2011)

work page 2011