Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 39 references

A programmable micromirror mask recovered synthetic planetary transits down to 40 ppm, a precision level that could support a solar instrument for calibrating stellar variability.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 06:12 UTC pith:Y6Q6F6RI

load-bearing objection Useful early benchtop data on TI's new HEP DMD, honestly reported, but the concluding claim about the architecture's photometric precision outruns what the controller-limited experiment can prove. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2601.23176 v1 pith:Y6Q6F6RI submitted 2026-01-30 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR

HEP digital micromirror devices for precision solar spectroscopy

Christian Robles , Suvrath Mahadevan This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords digital micromirror devicessolar spectroscopyextreme precision radial velocitytransit simulationphotometric precisionspatial light modulatorstellar variabilitytransit light source effect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to establish that the new High Efficiency Pixel digital micromirror device can serve as a reconfigurable spatial light modulator for a solar instrument, reaching the tens-of-ppm photometric precision needed to test stellar-variability and stellar-contamination models for extreme-precision radial velocity and transmission spectroscopy. To show this, the authors simulate artificial planetary transits by masking a uniform illuminated disk with the mirror array and recover transit depths from a Jupiter-like signal down to a Mars-like 40 ppm signal. They also characterize the device's optical efficiency, verifying diffraction-efficiency simulations with a laser, and measure a contrast ratio of 250:1 that they attribute to the evaluation board's duty cycle rather than the device itself. A sympathetic reader would care because resolved solar observations made by masking specific solar regions could calibrate the stellar noise that currently limits detection of Earth analogs and benchmark the transit light source effect that contaminates transmission spectra.

Core claim

The central claim is that the HEP DMD architecture, despite being developed for projection, is suitable for high-precision astronomical photometry: a bench setup using the DLP801RE as a binary mask recovered synthetic transit signals down to a 40 ppm depth (the Mars analog), with Jupiter, Neptune, and Earth analogs recovered from roughly 25 folded transits. The paper states that this validates the precision of control required to generate artificial transits on the Sun to test atmospheric transmission retrieval methods with no planetary atmospheres. The measured contrast ratio, however, is 250:1 under active control and 400:1 unpowered, well below the manufacturer's stated 1600:1, which the

What carries the argument

The central object is the DLP801RE High Efficiency Pixel digital micromirror device, a 1920x1200 array of 9-micron mirrors that tilt ±14.5 degrees to redirect light into ON or OFF states, with a 97% fill factor from filled vias. It functions as a reconfigurable spatial light modulator: an HDMI-driven GIF pattern maps white pixels to ON and black to OFF, letting the array act as a programmable mask that blocks a moving dark circle to mimic a planetary transit. Detection uses an integrating sphere and silicon photodiode in photovoltaic mode read by an electrometer, with octagonal-fiber scrambling to flatten illumination. The device's optical efficiency is modeled as T²_window × F × E_diffracti

Load-bearing premise

The recovered 40 ppm transit signal is assumed to reflect the DMD's intrinsic photometric precision, but the measured contrast discrepancy between active (250:1), unpowered (400:1), and manufacturer-specified (1600:1) states indicates the evaluation board may be injecting duty-cycle modulation; if that instability enters the ON state at the 40 ppm level, the transit recovery is not a clean measurement of the device.

What would settle it

Repeat the 40 ppm transit recovery with a dedicated controller that holds mirrors statically (no duty-cycle dithering) and compare the recovered depth and residual noise; if the depth changes or the noise worsens, the reported precision is electronics-limited. Alternatively, examine the power spectrum of the folded light curve for peaks at the DMD's pattern refresh rate; any excess at that frequency would indicate injected temporal modulation.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • A DMD-based solar instrument can selectively mask magnetically active regions and granulation cells on the resolved Sun to measure their individual contributions to convective blueshift and radial velocity jitter.
  • The same instrument can simulate a 'bare rock' transit across the Sun, providing a testbed for disentangling the transit light source effect from planetary atmospheric signals in transmission spectroscopy.
  • The measured contrast gap (250:1 active vs 400:1 unpowered vs 1600:1 spec) implies dedicated high-stability control electronics are a necessary next step for extreme-contrast applications.
  • The successful recovery of a 40 ppm transit suggests the device can meet the ~25 ppm detection requirement for a Mars-sized occultor once pixel quantization is accounted for.
  • The HEP DMD's high illumination rating and improved fill factor make it a candidate for solar observation despite substantial thermal loads.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the duty-cycle instability seen in the OFF state also modulates the ON state at the 40 ppm level, then the recovered transit depths may be partly an artifact of the electronics; a dedicated controller with static mirror hold could be tested by comparing transit recovery with the DMD unpowered versus actively held.
  • The same benchtop architecture could be extended to chromatic tests: using a tunable source to measure transit depth as a function of wavelength would reveal whether the DMD's wavelength-dependent diffraction efficiency introduces spurious transit depth variations that mimic stellar contamination.
  • The pixel-grid quantization implies real solar masking of small features is angular-resolution limited; mapping the grid scale to the solar disk requires a trade study between micromirror pitch and telescope plate scale.
  • The destructive window-removal attempt indicates extending the device into the near-infrared would require a custom window replacement, a high-risk procedure that is not yet demonstrated for the HEP package.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports early benchtop characterization of the Texas Instruments DLP801RE High Efficiency Pixel (HEP) digital micromirror device for use as a reconfigurable spatial light modulator in solar spectroscopy. The authors measure optical efficiency via simulation and a single HeNe-laser test, assess contrast in active and unpowered states, and simulate synthetic planetary transits by masking DMD pixels. They report recovery of transit signals down to a 40 ppm Mars-analog depth after phase-folding roughly 150 transits, and conclude that the HEP DMD architecture can achieve the photometric precision needed for next-generation astronomical instrumentation.

Significance. If fully substantiated, the demonstrated capability would support a promising path toward DMD-based solar instruments that can selectively mask solar surface regions to test stellar-contamination and stellar-variability models for extreme-precision radial velocity and transmission spectroscopy. The paper has clear strengths: it provides direct SEM evidence of the HEP via-fill architecture, transparently reports a controller-limited contrast deficiency, and includes physically generated synthetic transits rather than purely numerical simulations. However, the central claim currently rests on a single 40 ppm recovery without reported uncertainties, detection significance, or a control experiment excluding controller-induced artifacts.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.4, Fig. 11] The 40 ppm Mars-analog recovery is the central evidence for the photometric-precision claim, yet no uncertainties, error bars, or detection significance are reported. The paper does not provide a noise floor, residual scatter after detrending, or a comparison with photon-limited expectations. Because the target requirement is 25 ppm and the recovered depth is 40 ppm, the reader cannot assess whether this signal is statistically meaningful. Please add error bars to the phase-folded points, report the RMS of the residuals, compute a detection SNR, and include a null test with no injected transit to demonstrate that the detection pipeline does not produce spurious signals.
  2. [§4.2, Fig. 9 + §5.4] The active OFF-state contrast (250:1) is well below the unpowered value (400:1) and the manufacturer's 1600:1, and the text attributes this to the controller board's duty cycle. The transit experiment in §5.4 uses the same DLPC4430EVM controller and HDMI/GIF drive path. If duty-cycle modulation also affects the ON state at the tens-of-ppm level, the recovered transit depth could be contaminated by pattern-synchronous artifacts. The spline drift correction in §5.3 removes out-of-transit trends but cannot remove modulation coherent with the transit period or with the number of OFF pixels. A static-pattern control measurement—where the same mean flux is produced by a time-invariant mask, or where the transit pattern is applied with different pixel configurations—is necessary to attribute the observed stability to the DMD architecture rather than the drive electronics.
  3. [§4.1, Fig. 8] The optical-efficiency model is validated at only a single wavelength (HeNe). The paper's motivation centers on solar spectroscopy over broad visible and near-IR bands (e.g., NEID and HPF ranges in Fig. 8), so a single-point check is insufficient to establish the wavelength-dependent efficiency envelope. The authors state that broadband measurements are future work, and this limitation should be reflected in the conclusions. As written, the abstract's claim that 'optical efficiency was validated through simulations and laser testing' overstates a two-point (one simulated point plus one measured point) comparison.
  4. [§5.1–§5.4] The transit recoveries are self-consistency checks: the injected period, depth, and epoch are known, and the same device that creates the mask is the device under test. This is appropriate for validation, but the paper should explicitly state that these are not blind detections. In addition, the spline detrending in §5.3 is a free choice (knot spacing, smoothness) and no sensitivity analysis is shown. The strength of the claim 'the HEP DMD can achieve the photometric precision required' should be calibrated to the fact that the smallest signal is recovered only with ~150 folded transits of a known signal.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1] The lamp-stability figures (0.03%, 0.014%, 0.07%, 0.04%, 0.05%) are reported without measurement uncertainty or the timescale over which they apply. A brief note on how RMS is computed and whether it is per-sample or after binning would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Fig. 11] The Mars-like panel y-axis appears to show '20 0 20 40 60' with missing plus/minus signs; it should read '-20 0 20 40 60'. Also, all panels would benefit from error bars or at least a statement of the binned-point standard deviation.
  3. [Eq. (1)] The symbols T_window, F, E_diffraction, and R_mirror are not all defined immediately after the equation. Define them explicitly for clarity.
  4. [§4.1.2, Fig. 8] The caption says 'The measured HeNe test point is in good agreement with the simulated value' but no uncertainty is assigned to the measurement. Please add an error bar or state the measurement precision.
  5. [§4.2, Fig. 9] The sentence 'This unpowered measurement should be lower than the state in which the micromirrors are directing the light in the opposite direction' is confusing: unpowered contrast would be expected to be higher (better) than active OFF-state contrast if the OFF state had any leakage. Consider rewording to make the comparison direction clear.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the transit recoveries are end-to-end validation with known injected signals, and efficiency/contrast inputs come from external manufacturer data.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The synthetic transit tests (§5) impose a known mask pattern on the DMD and then recover the resulting light curve; the phase-folding uses the known injected period and the drift correction uses out-of-transit data, but the recovered depth is an empirical end-to-end check of the DMD's ability to create and hold the programmed modulation, not a prediction inferred from a fitted parameter. No parameter is fitted to a subset and then presented as an independent prediction; the efficiency model (§4.1, Eq. 1) is assembled from manufacturer window/fill-factor data and validated by a HeNe diffraction-efficiency measurement, and the 1600:1 expected contrast is attributed to the Texas Instruments HEP DMD paper (Ref. 13), not to the present authors' prior work. The acknowledged limitation in §4.2 and Fig. 9 — that the active OFF-state contrast (250:1) is degraded relative to unpowered (400:1) and expected (1600:1) values, suggesting the evaluation board imposes a duty cycle — is a validity caveat about whether the 40 ppm transit recovery is intrinsic to the DMD architecture, but it is not an instance of an input being renamed as a prediction or of a load-bearing self-citation. The central claim may overreach what the experiment distinguishes, but that is a correctness-risk concern, not circularity. Accordingly, no circular step is identified and the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the stability of the DMD evaluation chain, the uniformity of the scrambled illumination, the correctness of manufacturer optical data, and the assumption that detrending does not corrupt the injected signal. None of these are independently verified beyond the paper's own measurements.

free parameters (1)
  • Baseline detrending spline coefficients = Fit to each out-of-transit time series
    Used in Section 5.3 to remove lamp drift. If the spline absorbs part of the periodic transit signal, the recovered depths would be biased; the out-of-transit mask partially controls this, but no cross-validation is reported.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption DMD mirror states map exactly to the programmed binary pattern and remain stable during the exposure
    The entire transit simulation relies on ON/OFF states producing the intended attenuation without temporal jitter. The paper's own contrast discrepancy (250:1 active vs 400:1 unpowered) suggests the evaluation board may not hold mirrors statically.
  • domain assumption Octagonal fiber provides spatially uniform near-field illumination of the DMD
    Section 5.1 states octagonal fibers 'facilitate near-perfect near-field scrambling'; transit depth recovery assumes the stellar disk is flat and uniform across the modulated region.
  • domain assumption Phase folding with the known transit period and spline detrending does not remove or create the transit signal
    The reduction in Section 5.3 assumes the drift model is independent of the periodic signal. The transit period is known because the signal is injected, so this is a controlled calibration, but the assumption is not stress-tested.
  • domain assumption TI-provided diffraction efficiency calculator and window transmission data accurately describe the HEP DMD
    The efficiency model in Section 4.1 uses manufacturer tool values; only one HeNe validation point is measured, and the paper acknowledges that more wavelength coverage is needed.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 11363 in / 9690 out tokens · 115416 ms · 2026-08-04T06:12:06.633553+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of HEP digital micromirror devices for precision solar spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y6Q6F6RI

@misc{pith2026260123176,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: HEP digital micromirror devices for precision solar spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y6Q6F6RI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.23176}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present the motivation and early tests for a novel solar instrument that will harness the new High Efficiency Pixel (HEP) Texas Instruments DLP801RE Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) as a reconfigurable spatial light modulator. This design enables real-time, dynamic configuration of the field of view for targeted spectroscopy of magnetically active regions and full-disk observations. Optical efficiency was validated through simulations and laser testing. Destructive window removal allowed for detailed structural analysis, confirming the elimination of central vias present in previous models. We measured a contrast ratio of 250:1, currently limited by the evaluation board's duty cycle rather than the DMD itself. Furthermore, we successfully simulated artificial planetary transits, recovering depths ranging from gas giants to a 40 ppm rocky planet transit. These results demonstrate the HEP DMD's potential for high-precision solar and exoplanetary science applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.23176 by Christian Robles, Suvrath Mahadevan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustrative graphic showing the high efficiency pixel digital micromirror device from Texas Instruments. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Thorlabs stabilized QTH SLS201L shows high photometric stability over 60 hours. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic of the DMD optical bench setup. The light from the Thorlabs QTH lamp is coupled into [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Window transmission curves for common windows on Texas Instruments DMDs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: HEP DMD window was destructively removed to study the wafer level structure. SEMs of the surface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Simulations of the effect of illumination and projection solid angle on the diffraction efficiency. This [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The overall calculated efficiency for the HEP is strongest in the optical and suffers in the NIR from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The contrast measurements compared to the expected value from Ref. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (top) Images used on the surface of the DMD to simulate gas giant transits. ‘A’ is out-of-transit, ‘B’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Phase-folded and binned (N=100) photometric data for four synthetic planetary sizes. The transits [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Spatial light modulator and method,

    Hornbeck, L. J., “Spatial light modulator and method,” (1987). U.S. Patent 4,662,746

    1987

  2. [2]

    DMD reliability: a MEMS success story,

    Douglass, M., “DMD reliability: a MEMS success story,” in [Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation En- gineers (SPIE) Conference Series],Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series4980, 1–11 (Jan. 2003)

    2003

  3. [3]

    Digital Light Processing update: status and future applications,

    Hornbeck, L. J., “Digital Light Processing update: status and future applications,” in [Projection Displays V], Wu, M. H., ed.,Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series3634, 158–170 (May 1999)

    1999

  4. [4]

    A practical guide to digital micro-mirror devices (dmds) for wavefront shaping,

    Popoff, S. M., Bromberg, Y., Matth` es, M. W., and Guti´ errez-Cuevas, R., “A practical guide to digital micro-mirror devices (dmds) for wavefront shaping,” (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    IRMOS: an infrared multi-object spectrometer using a MEMS micro-mirror array,

    MacKenty, J. W., Greenhouse, M. A., Green, R. F., Sparr, L., Ohl, Raymond G., I., and Winsor, R. S., “IRMOS: an infrared multi-object spectrometer using a MEMS micro-mirror array,” in [Instrument Design and Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes], Iye, M. and Moorwood, A. F. M., eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (S...

    2003

  6. [6]

    RITMOS: a micromirror-based multi-object spectrometer,

    Meyer, R. D., Kearney, K. J., Ninkov, Z., Cotton, C. T., Hammond, P., and Statt, B. D., “RITMOS: a micromirror-based multi-object spectrometer,” in [Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy], Moor- wood, A. F. M. and Iye, M., eds.,Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series5492, 200–219 (Sept. 2004)

    2004

  7. [7]

    The James Webb Space Telescope Mission,

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., and Abbott, R. e. a., “The James Webb Space Telescope Mission,”Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific135, 068001 (June 2023). 11

    2023

  8. [8]

    Microshutters arrays for the JWST near-infrared spectrometer,

    Moseley, S. H., Arendt, R. G., Boucarut, R. A., Jhabvala, M., King, T., Kletetschka, G., Kutyrev, A. S., Li, M., Meyer, S. E., Rapchun, D., and Silverberg, R. F., “Microshutters arrays for the JWST near-infrared spectrometer,” in [Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Space Telescopes], Mather, J. C., ed.,Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (S...

    2004

  9. [9]

    In-situ evaluation of DMD contrast ratio using SAMOS: a DMD-based multi-object spectrograph and imager,

    Piotrowski, J. J., Smee, S. A., Hope, S., and Robberto, M., “In-situ evaluation of DMD contrast ratio using SAMOS: a DMD-based multi-object spectrograph and imager,” in [Ground-based and Airborne Instrumen- tation for Astronomy X], Bryant, J. J., Motohara, K., and Vernet, J. R. D., eds.,Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference ...

    2024

  10. [10]

    The opto-mechanical design of SAMOS: a DMD-based spectrograph for the SOAR telescope,

    Smee, S. A., Barkhouser, R., Harding, A., Hope, S., Robberto, M., Ninkov, Z., and Gennaro, M., “The opto-mechanical design of SAMOS: a DMD-based spectrograph for the SOAR telescope,” in [Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII], Evans, C. J., Simard, L., and Takami, H., eds.,Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Con...

    2018

  11. [11]

    DMDs for multi-object near-infrared spectrographs in astronomy,

    Smee, S. A., Barkhouser, R., Hope, S., Conley, D., Gray, A., Hope, G., and Robberto, M., “DMDs for multi-object near-infrared spectrographs in astronomy,” in [Emerging Digital Micromirror Device Based Systems and Applications X], Douglass, M. R. and Lee, B. L., eds.,Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series10546, 105460L ...

    2018

  12. [12]

    Micro-Mirror-Devices (MMDs): A New Family of MOEMS for the Habitable World Observatory,

    Robberto, M., Gennaro, M., Kassin, S., Smee, S. A., Gong, C., Huffman, J., Ninkov, Z., and Puchades, I., “Micro-Mirror-Devices (MMDs): A New Family of MOEMS for the Habitable World Observatory,”arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.11340 (June 2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    The HEP DMD: a new DLP pixel optimized for performance,

    Dewa, A. S., Ferri, J., McDonald, B., Martinez, J., and Dickerson, K., “The HEP DMD: a new DLP pixel optimized for performance,” in [Emerging Digital Micromirror Device Based Systems and Applications XVI], Ehmke, J. and Lee, B. L., eds.,Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series12900, 1290009 (Mar. 2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Extreme Precision Radial Velocity Working Group Final Report,

    Crass, J., Gaudi, B. S., Leifer, S., Beichman, C., Bender, C., Blackwood, G., Burt, J. A., Callas, J. L., Cegla, H. M., Diddams, S. A., Dumusque, X., Eastman, J. D., Ford, E. B., Fulton, B., Gibson, R., Halverson, S., Haywood, R. D., Hearty, F., Howard, A. W., Latham, D. W., L¨ ohner-B¨ ottcher, J., Mamajek, E. E., Mortier, A., Newman, P., Plavchan, P., Q...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Precise Radial Velocities,

    Burt, J. A., Dumusque, X., and Halverson, S., “Precise Radial Velocities,”arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.01954 (Nov. 2025)

    arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, [Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s], The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Espresso at vlt. on-sky performance and first results,

    Pepe, F., Cristiani, S., Rebolo, R., Santos, N. C., Dekker, H., Cabral, A., Di Marcantonio, P., Figueira, P., Lo Curto, G., Lovis, C., Mayor, M., M´ egevand, D., Molaro, P., Riva, M., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Amate, M., Manescau, A., Pasquini, L., Zerbi, F. M., Adibekyan, V., Abreu, M., Affolter, M., Alibert, Y., Aliverti, M., Allart, R., Allende Prieto, C...

    2021

  18. [18]

    Design of NEID, an extreme precision Doppler spectrograph for WIYN,

    Schwab, C., Rakich, A., Gong, Q., Mahadevan, S., Halverson, S. P., Roy, A., Terrien, R. C., Robertson, P. M., Hearty, F. R., Levi, E. I., Monson, A. J., Wright, J. T., McElwain, M. W., Bender, C. F., Blake, C. H., St¨ urmer, J., Gurevich, Y. V., Chakraborty, A., and Ramsey, L. W., “Design of NEID, an extreme precision Doppler spectrograph for WIYN,” in [G...

    2016

  19. [19]

    EXPRES: a next generation R V spectrograph in the search for earth-like worlds,

    Jurgenson, C., Fischer, D., McCracken, T., Sawyer, D., Szymkowiak, A., Davis, A., Muller, G., and Santoro, F., “EXPRES: a next generation R V spectrograph in the search for earth-like worlds,” in [Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI], Evans, C. J., Simard, L., and Takami, H., eds.,Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (...

    2016

  20. [20]

    MAROON-X: a radial velocity spectrograph for the Gemini Observatory,

    Seifahrt, A., St¨ urmer, J., Bean, J. L., and Schwab, C., “MAROON-X: a radial velocity spectrograph for the Gemini Observatory,” in [Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII], Evans, C. J., Simard, L., and Takami, H., eds.,Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series10702, 107026D (July 2018)

    2018

  21. [21]

    The habitable-zone planet finder: a stabilized fiber-fed NIR spectrograph for the Hobby-Eberly Telescope,

    Mahadevan, S., Ramsey, L., Bender, C., Terrien, R., Wright, J. T., Halverson, S., Hearty, F., Nelson, M., Burton, A., Redman, S., Osterman, S., Diddams, S., Kasting, J., Endl, M., and Deshpande, R., “The habitable-zone planet finder: a stabilized fiber-fed NIR spectrograph for the Hobby-Eberly Telescope,” in [Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for ...

    2012

  22. [22]

    SPIRou: the near-infrared spectropolarimeter/high-precision velocimeter for the Canada- France-Hawaii telescope,

    Artigau, ´E., Kouach, D., Donati, J.-F., Doyon, R., Delfosse, X., Baratchart, S., Lacombe, M., Moutou, C., Rabou, P., Par` es, L. P., Micheau, Y., Thibault, S., Reshetov, V. A., Dubois, B., Hernandez, O., Vall´ ee, P., Wang, S.-Y., Dolon, F., Pepe, F. A., Bouchy, F., Striebig, N., H´ enault, F., Loop, D., Saddlemyer, L., Barrick, G., Vermeulen, T., Dupieu...

    2014

  23. [23]

    NIRPS: an adaptive-optics assisted radial velocity spectrograph to chase exoplanets around M-stars,

    Wildi, F., Blind, N., Reshetov, V., Hernandez, O., Genolet, L., Conod, U., Sordet, M., Segovilla, A., Rasilla, J. L., Brousseau, D., Thibault, S., Delabre, B., Bandy, T., Sarajlic, M., Cabral, A., Bovay, S., Vall´ ee, P., Bouchy, F., Doyon, R., Artigau, E., Pepe, F., Hagelberg, J., Melo, C., Delfosse, X., Figueira, P., Santos, N. C., Gonz´ alez Hern´ ande...

    2017

  24. [24]

    The infrared Doppler (IRD) instrument for the Subaru telescope: instrument description and commissioning results,

    Kotani, T., Tamura, M., Nishikawa, J., Ueda, A., Kuzuhara, M., Omiya, M., Hashimoto, J., Ishizuka, M., Hirano, T., Suto, H., Kurokawa, T., Kokubo, T., Mori, T., Tanaka, Y., Kashiwagi, K., Konishi, M., Kudo, T., Sato, B., Jacobson, S., Hodapp, K. W., Hall, D. B., Aoki, W., Usuda, T., Nishiyama, S., Nakajima, T., Ikeda, Y., Yamamuro, T., Morino, J.-I., Baba...

    2018

  25. [25]

    Observing the sun as a star: Design and early results from the neid solar feed,

    Lin, A. S. J., Monson, A., Mahadevan, S., Ninan, J. P., Halverson, S., Nitroy, C., Bender, C. F., Logsdon, S. E., Kanodia, S., Terrien, R. C., Roy, A., Luhn, J. K., Gupta, A. F., Ford, E. B., Hearty, F., Laher, R. R., Hunting, E., McBride, W. R., Salazar Rivera, N. I., Rajagopal, J., Wolf, M. J., Robertson, P., Wright, J. T., Blake, C. H., Ca˜ nas, C. I.,...

    2022

  26. [26]

    The Impact of Stellar Surface Magnetoconvection and Oscillations on the Detection of Temperate, Earth-Mass Planets Around Sun-Like Stars,

    Cegla, H. M., “The Impact of Stellar Surface Magnetoconvection and Oscillations on the Detection of Temperate, Earth-Mass Planets Around Sun-Like Stars,”Geosciences9, 114 (Mar. 2019). 13

    2019

  27. [27]

    The Third Signature of Stellar Granulation,

    Gray, D. F., “The Third Signature of Stellar Granulation,”The Astrophysical Journal697, 1032–1043 (June 2009)

    2009

  28. [28]

    The Impact of the Convective Blueshift Effect on Spectroscopic Planetary Transits,

    Shporer, A. and Brown, T., “The Impact of the Convective Blueshift Effect on Spectroscopic Planetary Transits,”The Astrophysical Journal733, 30 (May 2011)

    2011

  29. [29]

    Detection of a spectroscopic transit of an extrasolar planet,

    Queloz, D., Eggenberger, A., Mayor, M., Perrier, C., Beuzit, J. L., Naef, D., Sivan, J. P., and Udry, S., “Detection of a spectroscopic transit of an extrasolar planet,”Astronomy & Astrophysics359, L13–L17 (2000)

    2000

  30. [30]

    The Transit Light Source Effect. II. The Impact of Stellar Heterogeneity on Transmission Spectra of Planets Orbiting Broadly Sun-like Stars,

    Rackham, B. V., Apai, D., and Giampapa, M. S., “The Transit Light Source Effect. II. The Impact of Stellar Heterogeneity on Transmission Spectra of Planets Orbiting Broadly Sun-like Stars,”The Astronomical Journal157, 96 (Mar. 2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    The effect of stellar contamination on low-resolution transmission spectroscopy: needs identified by NASA’s Exoplanet Exploration Program Study Analysis Group 21,

    Rackham, B. V., Espinoza, N., Berdyugina, S. V., Korhonen, H., MacDonald, R. J., Montet, B. T., Morris, B. M., Oshagh, M., Shapiro, A. I., Unruh, Y. C., Quintana, E. V., Zellem, R. T., Apai, D., Barclay, T., Barstow, J. K., Bruno, G., Carone, L., Casewell, S. L., Cegla, H. M., Criscuoli, S., Fischer, C., Fournier, D., Giampapa, M. S., Giles, H., Iyer, A.,...

    2023

  32. [32]

    Using lasers with DLP DMD technology,

    Texas Instruments, “Using lasers with DLP DMD technology,” White Paper DLPA037, Texas Instruments (2008). Application Report

    2008

  33. [33]

    Characterization of light diffraction by a digital micromirror device,

    Pereira, C., Abreu, M., Cabral, A., and Rebord˜ ao, J. M., “Characterization of light diffraction by a digital micromirror device,”Journal of Physics: Conference Series2407, 012048 (Dec. 2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    Dmd diffraction measurements to support design of projectors for test and evaluation of multispectral and hyperspectral imaging sensors,

    Rice, J. P., Neira, J. E., Kehoe, M., and Swanson, R., “Dmd diffraction measurements to support design of projectors for test and evaluation of multispectral and hyperspectral imaging sensors,” 72100D (Feb. 2009)

    2009

  35. [35]

    Fds100 specification sheet

    Thorlabs, Inc., “Fds100 specification sheet.” Technical Document 0637-S01 (2024). Accessed: January 15, 2026

    2024

  36. [36]

    Wavelength transmittance considerations for DLP dmd window,

    Instruments, T., “Wavelength transmittance considerations for DLP dmd window,” Tech. Rep. DLPA031E, Texas Instruments (2012). Application Report

    2012

  37. [37]

    Front- window replacement and performance characterization of a commercial digital micro-mirror device for use in the infrared spectrum,

    Borque Gallego, G., Giriens, L., Ummel, A., Roulet, J.-C., Guzzi, D., Raimondi, V., and Pache, C., “Front- window replacement and performance characterization of a commercial digital micro-mirror device for use in the infrared spectrum,” in [Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series], Minoglou, K., Karafolas, N., and Cugn...

    2023

  38. [38]

    Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX (2024)

    Texas Instruments,DMD Diffraction Efficiency Calculator. Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX (2024). User’s Guide

    2024

  39. [39]

    An Efficient, Compact, and Versatile Fiber Double Scrambler for High Precision Radial Velocity Instru- ments,

    Halverson, S., Roy, A., Mahadevan, S., Ramsey, L., Levi, E., Schwab, C., Hearty, F., and MacDonald, N., “An Efficient, Compact, and Versatile Fiber Double Scrambler for High Precision Radial Velocity Instru- ments,”The Astrophysical Journal806, 61 (June 2015). 14

    2015