pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.04858 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-04 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· hep-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Primordial black holes as cosmic accelerators of light dark matter: Novel direct detection constraints

Sk Jeesun , Anirban Majumdar , Rahul Srivastava
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 06:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-ex
keywords primordial black holeslight dark matterHawking radiationelectron recoildirect detectiondark matter constraintsEarth attenuation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Primordial black holes can accelerate light dark matter particles to energies above the thresholds of current underground detectors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that evaporating primordial black holes emit light fermionic dark matter with kinetic energies fixed by the black hole temperature. These particles travel to Earth carrying enough speed to produce measurable electron recoils even though standard galactic halo searches miss them due to low recoil energies. The authors calculate the flux after attenuation through the Earth's crust and for three interaction types: constant, scalar-mediated, and vector-mediated. They then apply the resulting recoil spectra to electron recoil data from XENONnT, LZ, and PandaX-4T to extract new limits on the dark matter mass and coupling strength.

Core claim

Primordial black holes evaporate via Hawking radiation and produce fermionic light dark matter whose energy is set by the black hole temperature. The particles reach terrestrial detectors and scatter on electrons, with recoil spectra that depend on whether the interaction is energy-independent or proceeds through scalar or vector mediators. After including the loss of kinetic energy while the particles cross the Earth's crust, the predicted rates allow new constraints on the dark matter-electron cross section to be placed using the electron recoil datasets of XENONnT, LZ, and PandaX-4T.

What carries the argument

Hawking radiation from primordial black holes that fixes the energy of emitted light dark matter particles, together with attenuation of their kinetic energy in the Earth's crust and the Lorentz structure of the dark matter-electron interaction.

If this is right

  • New upper limits on the mass and coupling of light fermionic dark matter from existing electron recoil searches.
  • Recoil energy distributions that differ clearly between constant, scalar-mediated, and vector-mediated interactions.
  • Detection prospects in lower-threshold neutrino detectors such as Super-Kamiokande and Hyper-Kamiokande.
  • Constraints that scale directly with the assumed number density and mass distribution of primordial black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Limits on primordial black hole abundance from gravitational wave or cosmic microwave background data could be combined with these results to close remaining parameter space.
  • The same evaporation channel could make other light particles produced by black holes visible in underground detectors.
  • Attenuation modeling developed here may apply to any high-energy light particle traveling through Earth before detection.
  • Directional information in next-generation detectors could separate this cosmic source from conventional dark matter signals.

Load-bearing premise

Primordial black holes of appropriate masses exist in sufficient abundance to produce a detectable flux of light dark matter particles reaching Earth.

What would settle it

No excess electron recoil events above background in the XENONnT, LZ, or PandaX-4T data that match the predicted spectra from black-hole-sourced dark matter, or independent upper limits on primordial black hole density showing the production rate is too low to be observable.

read the original abstract

Current multi-tonne-scale dark matter (DM) detectors are largely incapable of detecting light dark matter from the Galactic halo due to the energy threshold limitations of their recoil measurements. However, primordial black holes (PBHs) can evaporate via Hawking radiation to particles whose energies are set by the black hole temperature. Consequently, weakly interacting light dark matter (or dark radiation) particles produced in this manner can reach the Earth with sufficient flux and kinetic energy above the experimental thresholds. This opens up a novel avenue to probe the light dark sector in terrestrial experiments. In this work, we explore this possibility by considering fermionic DM produced through PBH evaporation and investigating its electron recoil signatures in direct detection experiments. We analyze both energy independent (constant) and energy dependent (scalar and vector mediated) DM-electron interactions, highlighting the strong dependence of the recoil spectra on the underlying Lorentz structure of the interaction. In addition, we also account for the attenuation effects due to the loss of kinetic energy while DM traverses through Earth's crust, which can significantly modify the incoming DM flux. Incorporating these effects carefully, we place constraints on light DM using the electron recoil data from XENONnT, LZ, and PandaX-4T. Finally, we also discuss the detection prospects of such dark matter in current and future generation neutrino detectors, such as Super-Kamiokande and Hyper-Kamiokande.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that evaporating primordial black holes (PBHs) in the ~10^15-10^17 g mass range can produce a flux of light fermionic dark matter (DM) particles with keV-scale energies sufficient to exceed the thresholds of current direct detection experiments. By modeling Hawking radiation, Earth attenuation, and DM-electron scattering for energy-independent, scalar-mediated, and vector-mediated interactions, the authors derive new constraints on light DM parameters from electron recoil data in XENONnT, LZ, and PandaX-4T, while also discussing detection prospects in Super-Kamiokande and Hyper-Kamiokande.

Significance. If the result holds, the work offers a novel indirect channel to constrain sub-GeV DM using existing multi-tonne detector data, where standard Galactic halo searches are limited by recoil thresholds. The explicit treatment of Lorentz structure dependence and attenuation adds technical value and could inform future analyses. However, the significance is reduced by the conditional nature of the flux on PBH abundance, which remains uncertain given existing gamma-ray, CMB, and microlensing bounds.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and results on constraints] The headline constraints on light DM (abstract and results section) are presented as new limits from XENONnT/LZ/PandaX-4T electron recoils, but the incident flux scales linearly with the PBH dark-matter fraction f_PBH. The manuscript does not appear to marginalize over f_PBH or specify the exact value adopted; without this, the cross-section bounds are conditional on an optimistic abundance that may conflict with existing observational limits on f_PBH in the relevant mass window.
  2. [PBH evaporation and flux modeling] The central claim relies on PBHs of appropriate masses producing a detectable flux at Earth (modeling section). Current bounds from gamma-ray backgrounds already restrict f_PBH in the 10^15-10^17 g range; the paper should explicitly compare the assumed f_PBH to these limits and show how the derived DM constraints weaken if f_PBH is reduced to the maximum allowed value.
  3. [Attenuation effects] Attenuation through Earth's crust is stated to significantly modify the incoming flux (attenuation section), yet the manuscript provides insufficient detail on the dE/dx calculation for keV-scale fermionic DM or its dependence on the interaction Lorentz structure. This modeling choice is load-bearing for the final recoil spectra and constraints.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract highlights the 'strong dependence' of recoil spectra on Lorentz structure but would benefit from a single quantitative example (e.g., the factor by which the rate changes between constant and vector cases at fixed cross section).
  2. [Figures and captions] Figure captions for the recoil spectra and constraint plots should explicitly state the fixed values of PBH mass, f_PBH, and DM mass used, to allow readers to reproduce the results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments. We have carefully addressed each point raised and revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and results on constraints] The headline constraints on light DM (abstract and results section) are presented as new limits from XENONnT/LZ/PandaX-4T electron recoils, but the incident flux scales linearly with the PBH dark-matter fraction f_PBH. The manuscript does not appear to marginalize over f_PBH or specify the exact value adopted; without this, the cross-section bounds are conditional on an optimistic abundance that may conflict with existing observational limits on f_PBH in the relevant mass window.

    Authors: We agree that the dependence on f_PBH should be made explicit. In the revised version, we have added a clear statement in the abstract and results section specifying that the primary results assume f_PBH = 1, while noting that the derived cross-section limits scale linearly with f_PBH. We have also included a brief discussion referencing existing bounds on f_PBH from gamma-ray observations, indicating that for the mass range considered, f_PBH is constrained to values below unity, and the limits can be rescaled accordingly. This addresses the conditional nature of the constraints. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [PBH evaporation and flux modeling] Current bounds from gamma-ray backgrounds already restrict f_PBH in the 10^15-10^17 g range; the paper should explicitly compare the assumed f_PBH to these limits and show how the derived DM constraints weaken if f_PBH is reduced to the maximum allowed value.

    Authors: We have revised the modeling section to include an explicit comparison of the assumed f_PBH with current gamma-ray, CMB, and microlensing bounds. We now show the DM constraints for both f_PBH = 1 (optimistic) and for the maximum allowed f_PBH from gamma-ray limits (approximately 10^{-2} to 10^{-4} depending on mass). This demonstrates how the bounds weaken with reduced abundance, providing a more complete picture. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Attenuation effects] Attenuation through Earth's crust is stated to significantly modify the incoming flux (attenuation section), yet the manuscript provides insufficient detail on the dE/dx calculation for keV-scale fermionic DM or its dependence on the interaction Lorentz structure. This modeling choice is load-bearing for the final recoil spectra and constraints.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for more detail here. The revised manuscript expands the attenuation section with explicit formulas for the energy loss dE/dx, based on the differential cross-section for each Lorentz structure (constant, scalar-mediated, vector-mediated). For vector interactions, the forward-peaking nature leads to reduced attenuation compared to scalar. We include the numerical integration method and validation against known limits for low-energy fermions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; constraints derived from external experimental data and standard Hawking evaporation formulas.

full rationale

The paper computes the incident DM flux using standard Hawking radiation for PBH evaporation (with f_PBH as an external parameter drawn from literature bounds), models attenuation through Earth's crust via conventional energy-loss equations, and then compares the resulting recoil spectra against independent published datasets from XENONnT, LZ, and PandaX-4T. No equation reduces a fitted parameter to a 'prediction' by construction, no central premise rests on a self-citation chain, and no ansatz or uniqueness claim is smuggled in. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard cosmological and particle physics assumptions about PBH evaporation and DM propagation without new invented entities.

free parameters (3)
  • PBH mass
    Sets the Hawking temperature and DM energy spectrum
  • PBH fraction f_PBH
    Determines the total flux of DM particles
  • DM mass m_DM
    Light DM mass in the relevant range
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Primordial black holes evaporate producing fermionic dark matter particles via Hawking radiation
    Standard assumption from black hole thermodynamics
  • domain assumption Dark matter particles experience energy loss while traversing Earth's crust
    Modeled to adjust the flux at the detector

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5557 in / 1289 out tokens · 39556 ms · 2026-05-16T06:44:48.662441+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 116 canonical work pages · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Zwicky,Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln,Helv

    F. Zwicky,Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln,Helv. Phys. Acta6(1933) 110–127

    work page 1933

  2. [2]

    V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr.,Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions,Astrophys. J.159(1970) 379–403

    work page 1970

  3. [3]

    A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter

    D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones et al.,A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter,Astrophys. J. Lett.648(2006) L109–L113, [astro-ph/0608407]. [4]Planckcollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [1807.06209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279–390, [hep-ph/0404175]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    F. S. Queiroz,Dark Matter Overview: Collider, Direct and Indirect Detection Searches, in 51st Rencontres de Moriond on EW Interactions and Unified Theories, pp. 427–436, ARISF, 2016.1605.08788

    work page arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Griest and D

    K. Griest and D. Seckel,Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances,Phys. Rev. D 43(1991) 3191–3203. – 28 –

    work page 1991

  7. [7]

    Direct Detection of Sub-GeV Dark Matter

    R. Essig, J. Mardon and T. Volansky,Direct Detection of Sub-GeV Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 076007, [1108.5383]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    New Constraints and Prospects for sub-GeV Dark Matter Scattering off Electrons in Xenon

    R. Essig, T. Volansky and T.-T. Yu,New Constraints and Prospects for sub-GeV Dark Matter Scattering off Electrons in Xenon,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 043017, [1703.00910]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    G. Elor, R. McGehee and A. Pierce,Maximizing Direct Detection with Highly Interactive Particle Relic Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 031803, [2112.03920]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    S. N. Gninenko, D. V. Kirpichnikov and N. V. Krasnikov,Search for Light Dark Matter with accelerator and direct detection experiments: comparison and complementarity of recent results,2307.14865

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Peculiar Relics from Primordial Black Holes in the Inflationary Paradigm

    A. Barrau, D. Blais, G. Boudoul and D. Polarski,Peculiar relics from primordial black holes in the inflationary paradigm,Annalen Phys.13(2004) 115–123, [astro-ph/0303330]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  12. [12]

    B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda and J. Yokoyama,Constraints on primordial black holes, Rept. Prog. Phys.84(2021) 116902, [2002.12778]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Villanueva-Domingo, O

    P. Villanueva-Domingo, O. Mena and S. Palomares-Ruiz,A brief review on primordial black holes as dark matter,Front. Astron. Space Sci.8(2021) 87, [2103.12087]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    K. M. Belotsky, A. D. Dmitriev, E. A. Esipova, V. A. Gani, A. V. Grobov, M. Y. Khlopov et al.,Signatures of primordial black hole dark matter,Mod. Phys. Lett. A29(2014) 1440005, [1410.0203]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  15. [15]

    A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh,Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate,J. Phys. G48(2021) 043001, [2007.10722]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Gil Choi, S

    H. Gil Choi, S. Jung, P. Lu and V. Takhistov,Coexistence Test of Primordial Black Holes and Particle Dark Matter from Diffractive Lensing,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 101002, [2311.17829]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    B. J. Carr and J. E. Lidsey,Primordial black holes and generalized constraints on chaotic inflation,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 543–553

    work page 1993

  18. [18]

    Ivanov, P

    P. Ivanov, P. Naselsky and I. Novikov,Inflation and primordial black holes as dark matter, Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 7173–7178

    work page 1994

  19. [19]

    Density Perturbations and Black Hole Formation in Hybrid Inflation

    J. Garcia-Bellido, A. D. Linde and D. Wands,Density perturbations and black hole formation in hybrid inflation,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 6040–6058, [astro-ph/9605094]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  20. [20]

    Supernatural Inflation: Inflation from Supersymmetry with No (Very) Small Parameters

    L. Randall, M. Soljacic and A. H. Guth,Supernatural inflation: Inflation from supersymmetry with no (very) small parameters,Nucl. Phys. B472(1996) 377–408, [hep-ph/9512439]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  21. [21]

    M. Y. Khlopov,Primordial Black Holes,Res. Astron. Astrophys.10(2010) 495–528, [0801.0116]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  22. [22]

    B. J. Carr,The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,Astrophys. J.201(1975) 1–19

    work page 1975

  23. [23]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov,The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model,Sov. Astron.10(1967) 602

    work page 1967

  24. [24]

    Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society152(04, 1971) 75–78

    S. Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society152(04, 1971) 75–78

    work page 1971

  25. [25]

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking,Black holes in the early Universe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.168(1974) 399–415

    work page 1974

  26. [26]

    Casanueva-Villarreal, N

    C. Casanueva-Villarreal, N. Padilla, P. B. Tissera, B. Liu and V. Bromm,Primordial black holes as dark matter candidates - Multi-frequency constraints from cosmic radiation backgrounds,Astron. Astrophys.699(2025) A49, [2505.10706]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    S. W. Hawking,Black hole explosions,Nature248(1974) 30–31

    work page 1974

  28. [28]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199–220. – 29 –

    work page 1975

  29. [29]

    Arbey and J

    A. Arbey and J. Auffinger,Physics Beyond the Standard Model with BlackHawk v2.0,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 910, [2108.02737]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Laha,Primordial Black Holes as a Dark Matter Candidate Are Severely Constrained by the Galactic Center 511 keVγ-Ray Line,Phys

    R. Laha,Primordial Black Holes as a Dark Matter Candidate Are Severely Constrained by the Galactic Center 511 keVγ-Ray Line,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 251101, [1906.09994]

    work page arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    R. Laha, J. B. Mu˜ noz and T. R. Slatyer,INTEGRAL constraints on primordial black holes and particle dark matter,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 123514, [2004.00627]

    work page arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    A. K. Saha and R. Laha,Sensitivities on nonspinning and spinning primordial black hole dark matter with global 21-cm troughs,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 103026, [2112.10794]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    A. Ray, R. Laha, J. B. Mu˜ noz and R. Caputo,Near future MeV telescopes can discover asteroid-mass primordial black hole dark matter,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 023516, [2102.06714]

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Capanema, A

    A. Capanema, A. Esmaeili and A. Esmaili,Evaporating primordial black holes in gamma ray and neutrino telescopes,JCAP12(2021) 051, [2110.05637]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Primordial Black Holes Evaporating before Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

    Q.-f. Wu and X.-J. Xu,Primordial Black Holes Evaporating before Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, 2509.05618

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Dasgupta, R

    B. Dasgupta, R. Laha and A. Ray,Neutrino and positron constraints on spinning primordial black hole dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 101101, [1912.01014]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Wang, D.-M

    S. Wang, D.-M. Xia, X. Zhang, S. Zhou and Z. Chang,Constraining primordial black holes as dark matter at JUNO,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 043010, [2010.16053]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Calabrese, D

    R. Calabrese, D. F. G. Fiorillo, G. Miele, S. Morisi and A. Palazzo,Primordial black hole dark matter evaporating on the neutrino floor,Phys. Lett. B829(2022) 137050, [2106.02492]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    De Romeri, P

    V. De Romeri, P. Mart´ ınez-Mirav´ e and M. T´ ortola,Signatures of primordial black hole dark matter at DUNE and THEIA,JCAP10(2021) 051, [2106.05013]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Bernal, V

    N. Bernal, V. Mu˜ noz-Albornoz, S. Palomares-Ruiz and P. Villanueva-Domingo,Current and future neutrino limits on the abundance of primordial black holes,JCAP10(2022) 068, [2203.14979]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Wu and X.-J

    Q.-f. Wu and X.-J. Xu,High-energy and ultra-high-energy neutrinos from Primordial Black Holes,JCAP02(2025) 059, [2409.09468]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Melanopogenesis: Dark Matter of (almost) any Mass and Baryonic Matter from the Evaporation of Primordial Black Holes weighing a Ton (or less)

    L. Morrison, S. Profumo and Y. Yu,Melanopogenesis: Dark Matter of (almost) any Mass and Baryonic Matter from the Evaporation of Primordial Black Holes weighing a Ton (or less), JCAP05(2019) 005, [1812.10606]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Baldes, Q

    I. Baldes, Q. Decant, D. C. Hooper and L. Lopez-Honorez,Non-Cold Dark Matter from Primordial Black Hole Evaporation,JCAP08(2020) 045, [2004.14773]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Bernal and ´O

    N. Bernal and ´O. Zapata,Self-interacting Dark Matter from Primordial Black Holes,JCAP 03(2021) 007, [2010.09725]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Bernal and ´O

    N. Bernal and ´O. Zapata,Gravitational dark matter production: primordial black holes and UV freeze-in,Phys. Lett. B815(2021) 136129, [2011.02510]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Bernal and ´O

    N. Bernal and ´O. Zapata,Dark Matter in the Time of Primordial Black Holes,JCAP03 (2021) 015, [2011.12306]

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Auffinger, I

    J. Auffinger, I. Masina and G. Orlando,Bounds on warm dark matter from Schwarzschild primordial black holes,Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) 261, [2012.09867]

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Gondolo, P

    P. Gondolo, P. Sandick and B. Shams Es Haghi,Effects of primordial black holes on dark matter models,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 095018, [2009.02424]

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Masina,Dark Matter and Dark Radiation from Evaporating Kerr Primordial Black Holes, Grav

    I. Masina,Dark Matter and Dark Radiation from Evaporating Kerr Primordial Black Holes, Grav. Cosmol.27(2021) 315–330, [2103.13825]. – 30 –

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    Cheek, L

    A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner,Primordial black hole evaporation and dark matter production. I. Solely Hawking radiation,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 015022, [2107.00013]

    work page arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Cheek, L

    A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner,Primordial black hole evaporation and dark matter production. II. Interplay with the freeze-in or freeze-out mechanism,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 015023, [2107.00016]

    work page arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Novel direct detection constraints on light dark matter

    T. Bringmann and M. Pospelov,Novel direct detection constraints on light dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 171801, [1810.10543]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Highly-boosted dark matter and cutoff for cosmic-ray neutrino through neutrino portal

    W. Yin,Highly-boosted dark matter and cutoff for cosmic-ray neutrinos through neutrino portal,EPJ Web Conf.208(2019) 04003, [1809.08610]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Y. Ema, F. Sala and R. Sato,Light Dark Matter at Neutrino Experiments,Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(2019) 181802, [1811.00520]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    C. V. Cappiello, K. C. Y. Ng and J. F. Beacom,Reverse Direct Detection: Cosmic Ray Scattering With Light Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 063004, [1810.07705]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    J. B. Dent, B. Dutta, J. L. Newstead and I. M. Shoemaker,Bounds on Cosmic Ray-Boosted Dark Matter in Simplified Models and its Corresponding Neutrino-Floor,Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 116007, [1907.03782]

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    Alvey, M

    J. Alvey, M. Campos, M. Fairbairn and T. You,Detecting Light Dark Matter via Inelastic Cosmic Ray Collisions,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 261802, [1905.05776]

    work page arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    Z.-H. Lei, J. Tang and B.-L. Zhang,Constraints on cosmic-ray boosted dark matter in CDEX-10,Chin. Phys. C46(2022) 085103, [2008.07116]

    work page arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    J. B. Dent, B. Dutta, J. L. Newstead, I. M. Shoemaker and N. T. Arellano,Present and future status of light dark matter models from cosmic-ray electron upscattering,Phys. Rev. D 103(2021) 095015, [2010.09749]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Xia, Y.-H

    C. Xia, Y.-H. Xu and Y.-F. Zhou,Production and attenuation of cosmic-ray boosted dark matter,JCAP02(2022) 028, [2111.05559]. [62]CDEXcollaboration, R. Xu et al.,Constraints on sub-GeV dark matter boosted by cosmic rays from the CDEX-10 experiment at the China Jinping Underground Laboratory,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 052008, [2201.01704]

    work page arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Alvey, T

    J. Alvey, T. Bringmann and H. Kolesova,No room to hide: implications of cosmic-ray upscattering for GeV-scale dark matter,JHEP01(2023) 123, [2209.03360]

    work page arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    C. A. Arg¨ uelles, V. Mu˜ noz, I. M. Shoemaker and V. Takhistov,Hadrophilic light dark matter from the atmosphere,Phys. Lett. B833(2022) 137363, [2203.12630]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    T. N. Maity and R. Laha,Cosmic-ray boosted dark matter in Xe-based direct detection experiments,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 117, [2210.01815]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    C. V. Cappiello and J. F. Beacom,Strong New Limits on Light Dark Matter from Neutrino Experiments,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 103011, [1906.11283]

    work page arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Jho, J.-C

    Y. Jho, J.-C. Park, S. C. Park and P.-Y. Tseng,Leptonic New Force and Cosmic-ray Boosted Dark Matter for the XENON1T Excess,Phys. Lett. B811(2020) 135863, [2006.13910]

    work page arXiv 2020

  66. [66]

    Cho, K.-Y

    W. Cho, K.-Y. Choi and S. M. Yoo,Searching for boosted dark matter mediated by a new gauge boson,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 095010, [2007.04555]. [69]PandaX-IIcollaboration, X. Cui et al.,Search for Cosmic-Ray Boosted Sub-GeV Dark Matter at the PandaX-II Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 171801, [2112.08957]

    work page arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    L. Su, L. Wu and B. Zhu,An improved bound on accelerated light dark matter,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67(2024) 221012, [2308.02204]. – 31 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Herrera and K

    G. Herrera and K. Murase,Probing light dark matter through cosmic-ray cooling in active galactic nuclei,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) L011701, [2307.09460]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    D. K. Ghosh, T. Gupta, M. Heikinheimo, K. Huitu and S. Jeesun,Boosted dark matter driven by cosmic rays and diffuse supernova neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063019, [2411.11973]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Herbermann, M

    T. Herbermann, M. Lindner and M. Sen,Attenuation of cosmic ray electron boosted dark matter,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 123023, [2408.02721]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Jeesun and A

    S. Jeesun and A. Majumdar,Cosmic ray electron boosted light dark matter: Implications of LZ 2025 data,2601.16903

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Jho, J.-C

    Y. Jho, J.-C. Park, S. C. Park and P.-Y. Tseng,Cosmic-Neutrino-Boosted Dark Matter (νBDM),2101.11262

    work page arXiv

  73. [73]

    Zhang,Speeding up dark matter with solar neutrinos,PTEP2022(2022) 013B05, [2001.00948]

    Y. Zhang,Speeding up dark matter with solar neutrinos,PTEP2022(2022) 013B05, [2001.00948]

    work page arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    W. Chao, T. Li and J. Liao,Connecting Primordial Black Hole to boosted sub-GeV Dark Matter through neutrino,2108.05608

    work page arXiv

  75. [75]

    Calabrese, M

    R. Calabrese, M. Chianese, D. F. G. Fiorillo and N. Saviano,Electron scattering of light new particles from evaporating primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 103024, [2203.17093]

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Li and J

    T. Li and J. Liao,Electron-target experiment constraints on light dark matter produced in primordial black hole evaporation,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 055043, [2203.14443]

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Lin, W.-H

    Y.-H. Lin, W.-H. Wu, M.-R. Wu and H. T.-K. Wong,Searching for Afterglow: Light Dark Matter Boosted by Supernova Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 111002, [2206.06864]

    work page arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    De Romeri, A

    V. De Romeri, A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias and R. Srivastava,XENONnT and LUX-ZEPLIN constraints on DSNB-boosted dark matter,JCAP03(2024) 028, [2309.04117]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Lin, T.-H

    Y.-H. Lin, T.-H. Tsai, G.-L. Lin, H. T.-K. Wong and M.-R. Wu,Signatures of afterglows from light dark matter boosted by supernova neutrinos in current and future large underground detectors,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 083013, [2307.03522]

    work page arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    Das and M

    A. Das and M. Sen,Boosted dark matter from diffuse supernova neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 075029, [2104.00027]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.