pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2002.12778 · v2 · submitted 2020-02-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph· hep-th

Recognition: no theorem link

Constraints on Primordial Black Holes

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords primordial black holesdark matter constraintsHawking radiationgravitational lensingbig bang nucleosynthesisgravitational wavescosmic microwave background
0
0 comments X

The pith

Updated limits restrict primordial black holes to a small fraction of the universe's mass across 10^{-5} to 10^{50} g.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compiles and refreshes the upper bounds on the fraction of the universe that could have collapsed into primordial black holes over a vast mass range. For black holes below about 10^{15} g, which evaporate via Hawking radiation, the constraints come from their effects on big bang nucleosynthesis, the cosmic microwave background, and gamma-ray backgrounds. For heavier black holes, the limits arise from gravitational lensing, dynamical friction on stars and galaxies, accretion signatures, and gravitational wave production. The work also addresses indirect limits from the amplitude of primordial density fluctuations and shows how the bounds relax when black holes follow an extended mass distribution rather than a single mass. A reader would care because these limits determine whether primordial black holes can explain any part of the dark matter or serve as seeds for cosmic structures.

Core claim

We update the constraints on the fraction of the Universe that may have gone into primordial black holes over the mass range 10^{-5}--10^{50} g. Those smaller than ~10^{15} g would have evaporated by now due to Hawking radiation, so their abundance at formation is constrained by the effects of evaporated particles on big bang nucleosynthesis, the cosmic microwave background, the Galactic and extragalactic gamma-ray and cosmic ray backgrounds and the possible generation of stable Planck mass relics. PBHs larger than ~10^{15} g are subject to a variety of constraints associated with gravitational lensing, dynamical effects, influence on large-scale structure, accretion and gravitational waves.

What carries the argument

Mass-dependent upper limits on the initial PBH collapse fraction beta(m) and the present-day dark matter fraction f_PBH(m), assembled from evaporation products for low masses and gravitational observables for high masses.

If this is right

  • Black holes below 10^{15} g are excluded as the dominant form of dark matter because their evaporation would overproduce background radiation.
  • In the range above 10^{15} g, gravitational lensing and dynamical constraints keep the PBH dark matter fraction below roughly 10 percent in most windows.
  • Even a sub-dominant PBH population can still seed supermassive black holes or contribute to LIGO/Virgo merger rates.
  • An extended mass function broadens the allowed parameter space and permits PBHs to address multiple cosmological roles simultaneously.
  • Second-order gravitational waves and mu-distortions from high-sigma peaks further cap the amplitude of primordial fluctuations that could form PBHs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Improved gravitational wave detectors could directly test the remaining narrow mass windows still compatible with a significant PBH dark matter fraction.
  • Inflationary models that generate large primordial fluctuations must be checked against these PBH bounds to remain viable.
  • Future CMB polarization measurements may tighten the indirect limits from acoustic reheating and thereby shrink the allowed PBH abundance at intermediate masses.

Load-bearing premise

Many of the constraints depend on uncertain details in models of evaporated particle interactions or the precise interpretation of observed radiation backgrounds.

What would settle it

A measured gamma-ray or microlensing event rate exceeding the predicted upper bound in any mass bin where the paper quotes a limit below the observed abundance would directly contradict the constraint for that mass.

read the original abstract

We update the constraints on the fraction of the Universe that may have gone into primordial black holes (PBHs) over the mass range $10^{-5}\text{--}10^{50}$ g. Those smaller than $\sim 10^{15}$ g would have evaporated by now due to Hawking radiation, so their abundance at formation is constrained by the effects of evaporated particles on big bang nucleosynthesis, the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the Galactic and extragalactic $\gamma$-ray and cosmic ray backgrounds and the possible generation of stable Planck mass relics. PBHs larger than $\sim 10^{15}$ g are subject to a variety of constraints associated with gravitational lensing, dynamical effects, influence on large-scale structure, accretion and gravitational waves. We discuss the constraints on both the initial collapse fraction and the current fraction of the CDM in PBHs at each mass scale but stress that many of the constraints are associated with observational or theoretical uncertainties. We also consider indirect constraints associated with the amplitude of the primordial density fluctuations, such as second-order tensor perturbations and $\mu$-distortions arising from the effect of acoustic reheating on the CMB, if PBHs are created from the high-$\sigma$ peaks of nearly Gaussian fluctuations. Finally we discuss how the constraints are modified if the PBHs have an extended mass function, this being relevant if PBHs provide some combination of the dark matter, the LIGO/Virgo coalescences and the seeds for cosmic structure. Even if PBHs make a small contribution to the dark matter, they could play an important cosmological role and provide a unique probe of the early Universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript updates constraints on the fraction of the Universe in primordial black holes (PBHs) for masses between 10^{-5} and 10^{50} g. It covers evaporation-induced limits for low-mass PBHs from BBN, CMB, gamma-rays and cosmic rays, and relic production, as well as gravitational, lensing, dynamical, accretion and gravitational wave constraints for higher masses. Indirect limits from primordial fluctuations and modifications for extended mass functions are also discussed, with emphasis on observational and theoretical uncertainties.

Significance. This compilation is a valuable reference for the field. By aggregating constraints from diverse observations and flagging uncertainties, it provides a clear overview of the allowed PBH parameter space. The discussion of extended mass functions is particularly useful given the relevance to dark matter, LIGO events and structure formation. The work does not introduce new derivations but faithfully summarizes the literature.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the evaporation threshold is stated as ~10^{15} g; adding a parenthetical note on the corresponding lifetime (e.g., 'corresponding to the age of the Universe') would improve immediate readability for non-specialist readers.
  2. [Introduction] The paper would benefit from a short table in the introduction that lists the principal constraint categories and the mass ranges they apply to, to help readers navigate the subsequent sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, their recognition of its value as a reference compilation, and their recommendation to accept. We appreciate the comments on the utility of the extended mass function discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: compilation of independent external constraints

full rationale

The paper aggregates and updates existing constraints on PBH abundance from a wide range of independent observational and theoretical sources (BBN, CMB, gamma-ray backgrounds, lensing, accretion, gravitational waves, etc.) across the stated mass range. It explicitly flags uncertainties in those inputs rather than deriving new results from its own equations or fits. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain; the work functions as a reference summary whose central claims rest on the cited external literature.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review, the claims rest on the validity of cited observational and theoretical results from the literature; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in this work itself.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard cosmological model assumptions underlying BBN, CMB physics, and gravitational lensing calculations
    Invoked throughout when translating observational limits into PBH abundance bounds.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5611 in / 1151 out tokens · 41918 ms · 2026-05-15T02:48:55.155179+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 22 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Constraints on the Primordial Black Hole Abundance using Pulsar Parameter Drifts

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The first search for scalar-induced gravitational waves via pulsar parameter drifts yields f_PBH < 10^{-10} (95% CL) for PBH masses 0.3 to 4e4 solar masses, strongly disfavoring a primordial black hole origin for LVK ...

  2. Tunneling and tidal stripping in multifield ultralight dark matter halos

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A semiclassical tunneling model shows that two-field ultralight DM halos have stability bounds that can be relaxed for some density-mass ratios but become more stringent across much of the parameter space compared to ...

  3. Reviving primordial black hole formation in slow first-order phase transitions

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Primordial black hole formation from slow first-order phase transitions remains viable if slow reheating after supercooling creates an early matter-dominated era allowing small overdensities to grow, producing black h...

  4. Gravitational wave emission from nonspherical collapse in an early matter-dominated era using N-body simulations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Full numerical N-body treatment is required for reliable gravitational wave predictions from nonspherical collapse in early matter-dominated eras, with resulting spectra mappable to detector sensitivities via horizon ...

  5. Gravitational-wave lensing beyond rays: a disordered-system approach

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A quenched-disorder approach with Schwinger-Keldysh path integrals produces an averaged density matrix for gravitational waves that separates phase-suppressing exponential terms from oscillatory corrections to coheren...

  6. Microscopic primordial black holes as macroscopic dark matter from large extra dimensions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In the ADD extra-dimension model, microscopic primordial black holes undergo runaway accretion and grow to macroscopic scales, allowing them to comprise all dark matter with initial abundances as low as 10^{-44}.

  7. Primordial Black Hole from Tensor-induced Density Fluctuation: First-order Phase Transitions and Domain Walls

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Tensor perturbations from first-order phase transitions and domain wall annihilation induce curvature fluctuations at second order that form primordial black holes, allowing asteroid-mass PBHs to comprise all dark mat...

  8. The Gravitational Spectral Radio Forest: A Signature of Primordial Black Holes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Asteroid-mass primordial black holes induce a Riemann tidal splitting of the 2P_{3/2} hydrogen state, turning the 9.9 GHz line into a ~2 GHz bandwidth gravitational spectral radio forest in H II regions with accretion...

  9. Primordial Black Hole Hotspots Beyond Flat Spacetime

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Hotspots around light primordial black holes cool faster in an expanding universe following T_plt ∝ t^{-11/15} and vanish completely in finite time, unlike everlasting hotspots in flat spacetime.

  10. Nonperturbative stochastic inflation in perturbative dynamical background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives stochastic equations from Schwinger-Keldysh formalism that include quantum diffusion and classical metric perturbations for non-perturbative ultra-slow-roll inflation, validated on Starobinsky and critical Hig...

  11. High-energy neutrino constraints on primordial black holes as dark matter

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    High-energy neutrino telescopes constrain sub-asteroid mass primordial black holes with extended mass functions as dark matter, yielding limits slightly weaker than but independent of gamma-ray bounds.

  12. Smoluchowski Coagulation Equation and the Evolution of Primordial Black Hole Clusters

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Monte Carlo solutions to the Smoluchowski coagulation equation yield runaway timescales and mass evolution for primordial black hole clusters at different redshifts based on cluster properties.

  13. Primordial black holes and the velocity acoustic oscillations features in 21 cm signals from the cosmic Dark Ages

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Primordial black holes generate up to 30% amplitude VAO wiggles in 21 cm signals from the Dark Ages at redshifts 20-40 even at dark matter fractions as low as 10^-13.

  14. The Magnetic Origin of Primordial Black Holes: Ultralight PBHs and Secondary GWs

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Inflationary magnetic fields induce curvature perturbations that form ultralight PBHs, generating a stochastic GW background with model-specific features.

  15. Primordial black hole dark matter from axion inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PBHs generated by axion inflation with gauge-field coupling can comprise all dark matter in the asteroidal mass range while producing a LISA-measurable stochastic GW background.

  16. Inflation driven by repulsive-like primordial black holes

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Repulsive-like primordial black holes in the Swiss-cheese framework produce quasi-de Sitter expansion, enabling inflation with evaporation reheating and acting as early dark energy for certain masses and densities.

  17. Purely Quadratic Non-Gaussianity from Tachyonic Instability: Primordial Black Holes and Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Purely quadratic non-Gaussianity from tachyonic instability allows narrow curvature spectra to exponentially suppress primordial black hole overproduction via correlation coefficient ρ approaching -1 while retaining s...

  18. Dark ages bounds on non-accreting massive compact halo objects

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Upper bounds on the dark matter fraction in MACHOs of 10^3 to 10^7 solar masses are derived from limits on distortions to the global 21-cm signal at z~17, z~89, and z>300.

  19. Memory-Burden Suppression of Hawking Radiation and Neutrino Constraints on Primordial Black Holes

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Memory-burden backreaction deforms the Hawking spectrum to suppress its high-energy tail, lowering total luminosity and neutrino flux by a factor set by a single suppression parameter and thereby relaxing IceCube boun...

  20. In-depth analysis of the clustering of dark matter particles around primordial black holes. Part III: CMB constraints

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CMB data limits the s-wave annihilation cross section of thermal dark matter particles to ≲ 10^{-30} cm³/s scaled by PBH fraction and mass for PBHs heavier than ~10^{-10} solar masses.

  21. Probing Primordial Black Holes with upcoming Radio Telescopes: a case study for LOFAR2.0, FAST Core Array and BINGO

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    LOFAR2.0, FAST Core Array and BINGO can constrain the PBH dark matter fraction f_PBH below 0.16-0.39 for masses above 10^{-2} to 10 solar masses via FRB lensing statistics.

  22. Not too close! Evaluating the impact of the baseline on the localization of binary black holes by next-generation gravitational-wave detectors

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 4.0

    Baselines of 8-11 ms light travel time for two CE detectors provide a reasonable compromise for BBH sky localization, with third detectors eliminating multimodality for most or all events.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 22 Pith papers · 169 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    This applies generically if the PBHs form from density fluctuations with a δ-function power spectrum

    A critical collapse mass function of the form ψ(M)∝ M2.85 exp(−(M/Mf)2.85) , (107) where the exponent 2.85 assumes radiation-domination [33, 44, 148, 551]. This applies generically if the PBHs form from density fluctuations with a δ-function power spectrum. In this case, the mass spectrum extends down to arbitrarily low masses but there is an exponential u...

  2. [2]

    stupendously large black holes

    Special consideration is required in the w = 0 (matter-dominated) case [552], because both cut-offs in (106) can then be relevant. For example, this may arise due to some form of phase transition in which the mass is channeled into non-relativistic particles [76, 77] or due to slow reheating after inflation [80]. Since Eq. (106) predicts γ = 0 in this case,...

  3. [3]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, Sov. Astron. 10, 602 (1967)

  4. [4]

    S. W. Hawking, Nature 248, 30 (1974)

  5. [5]

    P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016), arXiv:1502.01589 [astro-ph.CO]

  6. [6]

    G. F. Chapline, Nature 253, 251 (1975)

  7. [7]

    R. H. Cyburt, B. D. Fields, and K. A. Olive, Phys. Lett. B 567, 227 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302431

  8. [8]

    D. N. Page and S. W. Hawking, Astrophys. J. 206, 1 (1976)

  9. [9]

    New constraints on the primordial black hole number density from Galactic gamma-ray astronomy

    R. Lehoucq, M. Cass´ e, J.-M. Casandjian, and I. Grenier, Astron. Astrophys. 502, 37 (2009), arXiv:0906.1648 [astro- ph.HE]

  10. [10]

    Primordial black holes as a source of extremely high energy cosmic rays

    A. Barrau, Astropart. Phys. 12, 269 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9907347

  11. [11]

    P. N. Okele and M. J. Rees, Astron. Astrophys. 81, 263 (1980)

  12. [12]

    K. M. Belotsky and A. A. Kirillov, JCAP 01, 041 (2015), arXiv:1409.8601 [astro-ph.CO]

  13. [13]

    D. B. Cline, D. A. Sanders, and W. Hong, Astrophys. J. 486, 169 (1997)

  14. [14]

    M. R. S. Hawkins, Nature 366, 242 (1993)

  15. [15]

    C. G. Lacey and J. P. Ostriker, Astrophys. J. 299, 633 (1985)

  16. [16]

    Formation of MACHO-Primordial Black Holes in Inflationary Cosmology

    J. Yokoyama, Astron. Astrophys. 318, 673 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9509027. 58

  17. [17]

    Could supermassive black holes be quintessential primordial black holes?

    R. Bean and J. Magueijo, Phys. Rev. D 66, 063505 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0204486

  18. [18]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: The Power Spectrum and Evaporation of Early Structures

    N. Afshordi, P. McDonald, and D. N. Spergel, Astrophys. J. Lett. 594, L71 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302035

  19. [19]

    Effect of Primordial Black Holes on the Cosmic Microwave Background and Cosmological Parameter Estimates

    M. Ricotti, J. P. Ostriker, and K. J. Mack, Astrophys. J. 680, 829 (2008), arXiv:0709.0524 [astro-ph]

  20. [20]

    S. Bird, I. Cholis, J. B. Mu˜ noz, Y. Ali-Ha¨ ımoud, M. Kamionkowski, E. D. Kovetz, A. Raccanelli, and A. G. Riess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 201301 (2016), arXiv:1603.00464 [astro-ph.CO]

  21. [21]

    Peculiar Relics from Primordial Black Holes in the Inflationary Paradigm

    A. Barrau, D. Blais, G. Boudoul, and D. Polarski, Annalen Phys. 13, 115 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0303330

  22. [22]

    B. Carr, F. K¨ uhnel, and M. Sandstad, Phys. Rev. D 94, 083504 (2016), arXiv:1607.06077 [astro-ph.CO]

  23. [23]

    B. Carr, S. Clesse, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, and F. K¨ uhnel, Phys. Dark Univ.31, 100755 (2021), arXiv:1906.08217 [astro-ph.CO]

  24. [24]

    Carr and F

    B. Carr and F. K¨ uhnel, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci.70, 355 (2020), arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]

  25. [25]

    Hawking, Mon

    S. Hawking, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 152, 75 (1971)

  26. [26]

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168, 399 (1974)

  27. [27]

    B. J. Carr, Astrophys. J. 201, 1 (1975)

  28. [28]

    D. K. Nadezhin, I. D. Novikov, and A. G. Polnarev, Sov. Astron. 22, 129 (1978)

  29. [29]

    G. V. Bicknell and R. N. Henriksen, Astrophys. J. 232, 670 (1979)

  30. [30]

    Black hole formation in the Friedmann universe: Formulation and computation in numerical relativity

    M. Shibata and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 60, 084002 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9905064

  31. [31]

    A. M. Green, A. R. Liddle, K. A. Malik, and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 70, 041502(R) (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0403181

  32. [32]

    Threshold of primordial black hole formation

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, and K. Kohri, Phys. Rev. D 88, 084051 (2013), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 89, 029903 (2014)], arXiv:1309.4201 [astro-ph.CO]

  33. [33]

    Cosmological long-wavelength solutions and primordial black hole formation

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, T. Nakama, and Y. Koga, Phys. Rev. D 91, 084057 (2015), arXiv:1503.03934 [gr-qc]

  34. [34]

    J. C. Niemeyer and K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5481 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9709072

  35. [35]

    J. C. Niemeyer and K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. D 59, 124013 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9901292

  36. [36]

    Computations of primordial black hole formation

    I. Musco, J. C. Miller, and L. Rezzolla, Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 1405 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0412063

  37. [37]

    Primordial black hole formation in the radiative era: investigation of the critical nature of the collapse

    I. Musco, J. C. Miller, and A. G. Polnarev, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 235001 (2009), arXiv:0811.1452 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    A. G. Polnarev and I. Musco, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 1405 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0605122

  39. [39]

    Identifying the most crucial parameters of the initial curvature profile for primordial black hole formation

    T. Nakama, T. Harada, A. G. Polnarev, and J. Yokoyama, JCAP 01, 037 (2014), arXiv:1310.3007 [gr-qc]

  40. [40]

    Musco, Phys

    I. Musco, Phys. Rev. D 100, 123524 (2019), arXiv:1809.02127 [gr-qc]

  41. [41]

    Escriv` a, C

    A. Escriv` a, C. Germani, and R. K. Sheth, Phys. Rev. D 101, 044022 (2020), arXiv:1907.13311 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    The abundance of primordial black holes depends on the shape of the inflationary power spectrum

    C. Germani and I. Musco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 141302 (2019), arXiv:1805.04087 [astro-ph.CO]

  43. [43]

    Musco, V

    I. Musco, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063538 (2021), arXiv:2011.03014 [astro-ph.CO]

  44. [44]

    Single-field inflation, anomalous enhancement of superhorizon fluctuations, and non-Gaussianity in primordial black hole formation

    R. Saito, J. Yokoyama, and R. Nagata, JCAP 06, 024 (2008), arXiv:0804.3470 [astro-ph]

  45. [45]

    Kehagias, I

    A. Kehagias, I. Musco, and A. Riotto, JCAP 12, 029 (2019), arXiv:1906.07135 [astro-ph.CO]

  46. [46]

    Cosmological constraints on primordial black holes produced in the near-critical gravitational collapse

    J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D 58, 107502 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9804041

  47. [47]

    A. M. Green and A. R. Liddle, Phys. Rev. D 60, 063509 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9901268

  48. [48]

    G. D. Kribs, A. K. Leibovich, and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D 60, 103510 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9904021

  49. [49]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, K. Kohri, Y. Koga, and T. Monobe, Astrophys. J. 908, 140 (2021), arXiv:2011.00710 [astro- ph.CO]

  50. [50]

    Primordial Black Hole Formation during the QCD Epoch

    K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. D 55, R5871 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9605152

  51. [51]

    Primordial Black Holes from the QCD Transition?

    P. Widerin and C. Schmid, arXiv:astro-ph/9808142

  52. [52]

    Primordial Black Hole Formation during First-Order Phase Transitions

    K. Jedamzik and J. C. Niemeyer, Phys. Rev. D 59, 124014 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9901293

  53. [53]

    C. T. Byrnes, M. Hindmarsh, S. Young, and M. R. S. Hawkins, JCAP 08, 041 (2018), arXiv:1801.06138 [astro-ph.CO]

  54. [54]

    B. J. Carr and J. E. Lidsey, Phys. Rev. D 48, 543 (1993)

  55. [55]

    Ivanov, P

    P. Ivanov, P. Naselsky, and I. Novikov, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7173 (1994)

  56. [56]

    Chaotic new inflation and formation of primordial black holes

    J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D 58, 083510 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9802357

  57. [57]

    Primordial black holes from single field models of inflation

    J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido and E. Ruiz Morales, Phys. Dark Univ.18, 47 (2017), arXiv:1702.03901 [astro-ph.CO]

  58. [58]

    Primordial black hole dark matter from single field inflation

    G. Ballesteros and M. Taoso, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023501 (2018), arXiv:1709.05565 [hep-ph]

  59. [59]

    M. P. Hertzberg and M. Yamada, Phys. Rev. D 97, 083509 (2018), arXiv:1712.09750 [astro-ph.CO]

  60. [60]

    W. H. Kinney, Phys. Rev. D 72, 023515 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0503017

  61. [61]

    On primordial black holes from an inflection point

    C. Germani and T. Prokopec, Phys. Dark Univ. 18, 6 (2017), arXiv:1706.04226 [astro-ph.CO]

  62. [62]

    Pattison, V

    C. Pattison, V. Vennin, H. Assadullahi, and D. Wands, JCAP 10, 046 (2017), arXiv:1707.00537 [hep-th]

  63. [63]

    J. M. Ezquiaga and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, JCAP08, 018 (2018), arXiv:1805.06731 [astro-ph.CO]

  64. [64]

    Primordial Black Holes from Inflation and Quantum Diffusion

    M. Biagetti, G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias, and A. Riotto, JCAP 07, 032 (2018), arXiv:1804.07124 [astro-ph.CO]

  65. [65]

    E. D. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 56, 2019 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9703232 [hep-ph]

  66. [66]

    Black hole formation and slow-roll inflation

    K. Kohri, D. H. Lyth, and A. Melchiorri, JCAP 04, 038 (2008), arXiv:0711.5006 [hep-ph]

  67. [67]

    Generating Primordial Black Holes Via Hilltop-Type Inflation Models

    L. Alabidi and K. Kohri, Phys. Rev. D 80, 063511 (2009), arXiv:0906.1398 [astro-ph.CO]

  68. [68]

    A. M. Green and K. A. Malik, Phys. Rev. D 64, 021301(R) (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0008113

  69. [69]

    B. A. Bassett and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 63, 123503 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0008328

  70. [70]

    Martin, T

    J. Martin, T. Papanikolaou, and V. Vennin, JCAP 01, 024 (2020), arXiv:1907.04236 [astro-ph.CO]

  71. [71]

    Supernatural Inflation: Inflation from Supersymmetry with No (Very) Small Parameters

    L. Randall, M. Soljacic, and A. H. Guth, Nucl. Phys. B472, 377 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9512439

  72. [72]

    Density Perturbations and Black Hole Formation in Hybrid Inflation

    J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, A. D. Linde, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 54, 6040 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9605094

  73. [73]

    Primordial Black Hole Formation in a Double Inflation Model in Supergravity

    M. Kawasaki, N. Sugiyama, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D 57, 6050 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9710259

  74. [74]

    Massive Primordial Black Holes from Hybrid Inflation as Dark Matter and the seeds of Galaxies

    S. Clesse and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Phys. Rev. D92, 023524 (2015), arXiv:1501.07565 [astro-ph.CO]

  75. [75]

    D. H. Lyth and D. Wands, Phys. Lett. B 524, 5 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0110002 [hep-ph]

  76. [76]

    Primordial black hole formation from an axion-like curvaton model

    M. Kawasaki, N. Kitajima, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D 87, 063519 (2013), arXiv:1207.2550 [hep-ph]

  77. [77]

    Primordial Black Holes from the inflating curvaton

    K. Kohri, C.-M. Lin, and T. Matsuda, Phys. Rev. D 87, 103527 (2013), arXiv:1211.2371 [hep-ph]. 59

  78. [78]

    M. Y. Khlopov and A. G. Polnarev, Phys. Lett. B 97, 383 (1980)

  79. [79]

    A. G. Polnarev and M. Y. Khlopov, Sov. Astron. 25, 406 (1981)

  80. [80]

    A. G. Polnarev and M. Y. Khlopov, Sov. Astron. 26, 391 (1982)

Showing first 80 references.