pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15219 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Nonperturbative stochastic inflation in perturbative dynamical background

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 09:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th
keywords stochastic inflationultra-slow-rollSchwinger-Keldysh formalismArnowitt-Deser-Misner equationsquasi-de Sittermetric perturbationspower spectrumnon-perturbative dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

First-order stochastic equations derived from the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism consistently incorporate metric perturbations into the treatment of ultra-slow-roll inflation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to create a systematic way to handle regimes in inflation where fluctuations grow large enough that ordinary perturbative calculations fail. It starts from the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism to extract the leading quantum diffusion terms and then folds in the effects of metric perturbations by solving the classical Arnowitt-Deser-Misner equations. The resulting compact stochastic equations are applied to two concrete models that contain a transient ultra-slow-roll phase. A reader would care because many proposed mechanisms for primordial black holes or other non-Gaussian features rely on precisely these non-perturbative regimes, yet no first-principles bridge to the stochastic-δN approach had existed before.

Core claim

First-order stochastic equations in quasi-de Sitter spacetime are obtained directly from the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism; a practical reduction procedure then yields compact forms that embed the classical nonlinear response of the metric through the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner equations, thereby retaining leading quantum diffusion while capturing classical non-perturbative effects, as confirmed by lattice simulations in the Starobinsky model and by explicit power-spectrum calculations in critical Higgs inflation.

What carries the argument

The Schwinger-Keldysh formalism for deriving the stochastic noise terms, combined with the classical Arnowitt-Deser-Misner equations that supply the metric perturbations in a perturbative dynamical background.

If this is right

  • Lattice simulations of the Starobinsky model agree with both the analytic stochastic results and the numerical solution of the stochastic equations.
  • Critical Higgs inflation shows a modest suppression of the curvature power spectrum together with an oscillatory feature induced by the ultra-slow-roll dynamics.
  • The framework remains valid only inside the regime of small metric perturbations.
  • The procedure supplies a direct link between quantum-field-theory calculations in curved spacetime and the stochastic-δN formalism.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same reduction steps could be repeated for any other inflationary potential that features a short ultra-slow-roll interval to predict the resulting power-spectrum shape.
  • Because the equations are first-order in the fluctuations, they can be integrated numerically for many realizations, allowing direct sampling of rare large excursions without full lattice runs.
  • Extending the background to include small tensor modes would test whether the same stochastic treatment remains consistent when gravitational waves are added.

Load-bearing premise

Metric perturbations are assumed to remain small enough that the perturbative expansion of the stochastic equations stays self-consistent.

What would settle it

A lattice simulation of the Starobinsky piecewise-linear model that produces a power spectrum visibly different from the analytic result obtained from the derived stochastic equations would falsify the derivation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15219 by Shao-Jiang Wang, Xiao-Quan Ye.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The maximum value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The power spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The interpolation of stochastic kicks as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The maximum value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The power spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. In the left panel, we show the PDF of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Inflationary models that contain a transient ultra-slow-roll phase can exhibit strong non-perturbative dynamics, making the usual perturbative treatment of cosmological fluctuations incomplete. In such regimes, quantum diffusion and the nonlinear gravitational response of the background can both play important roles, motivating a framework that treats them systematically within quantum field theory in curved spacetime. In this work, we derive the first-order stochastic equations in quasi-de Sitter spacetime from the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism and develop a practical procedure to obtain compact stochastic equations that consistently incorporate metric perturbations via the classical Arnowitt-Deser-Misner equations. Our approach systematically captures classical non-perturbative effects while retaining the leading first-order quantum diffusion. We apply the formalism to two inflationary scenarios with an ultra-slow-roll phase, namely the Starobinsky piecewise-linear model and critical Higgs inflation. For the Starobinsky model, numerical lattice simulations validate the stochastic description and agree well with analytical results. For critical Higgs inflation, we find that the dynamics lead to a minor suppression of the power spectrum with an additional oscillation feature. Throughout, our analysis is restricted to the regime of small metric perturbations, ensuring the self-consistency of the perturbative stochastic treatment. These results establish a concrete bridge between first-principles quantum field theory in curved spacetime and the stochastic-$\delta N$ formalism for investigating non-perturbative inflationary dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper derives first-order stochastic equations for quasi-de Sitter inflation from the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism and incorporates metric perturbations through classical ADM evolution. It applies the resulting framework to two ultra-slow-roll models (Starobinsky piecewise-linear and critical Higgs inflation), reports lattice validation for the former and an analytic result of minor power-spectrum suppression plus oscillations for the latter, and explicitly restricts the treatment to the regime of small metric perturbations.

Significance. If the central derivation and self-consistency checks hold, the work supplies a concrete link between first-principles QFT in curved spacetime and the stochastic-δN approach, with demonstrated numerical agreement in one model. This could be useful for systematic studies of non-perturbative dynamics in transient ultra-slow-roll phases.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and model-application sections] Abstract and § on applications: the restriction to small metric perturbations is stated to guarantee self-consistency, yet no quantitative evolution check or bound is provided showing that curvature perturbations sourced by ultra-slow-roll quantum diffusion remain perturbatively small throughout the transient phase in either model. This assumption is load-bearing for the perturbative stochastic treatment.
  2. [Starobinsky-model results] Lattice-validation paragraph: the reported agreement between stochastic equations and lattice simulations for the Starobinsky model is cited without accompanying error analysis, resolution study, or statement of the precise observables compared, limiting assessment of how robustly the first-order stochastic truncation is validated.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Derivation section] Notation for the stochastic noise terms and the precise matching between Schwinger-Keldysh correlators and the ADM-sourced drift should be clarified with an explicit equation reference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the significance of our work and for the constructive comments that help improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and model-application sections] Abstract and § on applications: the restriction to small metric perturbations is stated to guarantee self-consistency, yet no quantitative evolution check or bound is provided showing that curvature perturbations sourced by ultra-slow-roll quantum diffusion remain perturbatively small throughout the transient phase in either model. This assumption is load-bearing for the perturbative stochastic treatment.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative check on the amplitude of curvature perturbations is necessary to substantiate the self-consistency of the perturbative treatment. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit analysis (new subsection in the applications section) of the root-mean-square value of the curvature perturbation ζ during the ultra-slow-roll phase for both the Starobinsky piecewise-linear and critical Higgs models. This will demonstrate that ζ remains well below unity throughout the transient, consistent with the small-metric-perturbation regime assumed in the derivation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Starobinsky-model results] Lattice-validation paragraph: the reported agreement between stochastic equations and lattice simulations for the Starobinsky model is cited without accompanying error analysis, resolution study, or statement of the precise observables compared, limiting assessment of how robustly the first-order stochastic truncation is validated.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current lattice-validation paragraph is insufficiently detailed. In the revised manuscript we will expand this discussion to include: (i) the precise observables used for comparison (the curvature power spectrum P_ζ(k) evaluated at the end of inflation), (ii) statistical error estimates obtained from an ensemble of 100 independent realizations, and (iii) a resolution study demonstrating convergence of the results with increasing lattice spacing and time-step refinement. These additions will allow a clearer assessment of the robustness of the first-order stochastic truncation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation from Schwinger-Keldysh formalism and classical ADM equations is independent of target results

full rationale

The central derivation begins from the established Schwinger-Keldysh formalism to obtain first-order stochastic equations in quasi-de Sitter spacetime and incorporates metric perturbations via the classical Arnowitt-Deser-Misner equations. The restriction to small metric perturbations is explicitly stated as an assumption that ensures self-consistency of the perturbative treatment, rather than a result derived from or fitted to the target observables. No parameters are fitted to produce predictions that reduce by construction to the inputs, no load-bearing self-citations are invoked for uniqueness or ansatz, and lattice simulations provide independent validation for the Starobinsky model. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks with no circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of quasi-de Sitter spacetime and perturbative validity for small metric perturbations; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Quasi-de Sitter spacetime approximation for deriving stochastic equations
    Invoked to obtain first-order stochastic equations from Schwinger-Keldysh formalism.
  • domain assumption Small metric perturbations regime for self-consistency
    Stated explicitly to ensure perturbative stochastic treatment remains valid.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5545 in / 1470 out tokens · 29127 ms · 2026-05-10T09:49:00.836405+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Stochastic inflation from a non-equilibrium renormalization group

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A generalized Fokker-Planck equation for stochastic inflation is derived from a Polchinski-type renormalization group flow on the density matrix, incorporating dissipative and diffusive corrections beyond the leading order.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

148 extracted references · 117 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Once the mode functions forδϕandδπare ob- tained, we follow the procedure outlined in Ref

    When the modes are deep inside the horizon, we can use the Bunch-Davies (BD) vacuum as the ini- tial condition of the inflaton fieldϕand setψ= 0 at the beginning, i.e., δϕi = ieikη(N) a(N) √ 2k and δπi = eikη(N) a(N) √ 2k −i+ k a(N)H(N) , whereη(N) is the conformal time defined as η= Z Nend N dN a(N)H(N) . Once the mode functions forδϕandδπare ob- tained,...

  2. [2]

    Since we have verified that the compact stochas- tic equations are equivalent to background Fried- mann equations and Mukhanov-Sasaki equation at first two orders in Appendix B, we perform direct numerical simulations of all modes starting from their initial conditions and stick to theδN-gauge throughout the simulation. The stochastic terms are precompute...

  3. [3]

    Then, we can use the gauge-invariant quantityR=ψ−δϕ/¯πto derive all kinds of correlation functions and extract the power spectrum

    We will terminate the lattice simulations when the comoving Hubble horizon reaches the same order as the lattice spacing ∆x. Then, we can use the gauge-invariant quantityR=ψ−δϕ/¯πto derive all kinds of correlation functions and extract the power spectrum. In our simulations, we use the lattice of 256 3 points to cover the range ofk/k ∗ ∼[1,10 2], which co...

  4. [4]

    The numerical parameters are listed in Table I

    The pa- rameterN ∗ is thee-folding number at which the scalar fieldϕcrosses the breaking point of the potential. The numerical parameters are listed in Table I. For numerical implementation, the noise termsξ ϕ and ξπ are correlated stochastic variables. We can equiv- alently express these two noises as linear combinations of two independent normalized Gau...

  5. [5]

    The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,

    Alan H. Guth, “The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,” Phys. Rev. D 23, 347–356 (1981)

  6. [6]

    A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,

    Alexei A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,” Phys. Lett. B91, 99–102 (1980)

  7. [7]

    A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,

    Andrei D. Linde, “A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,” Phys. Lett. B108, 389–393 (1982)

  8. [8]

    Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,

    Andreas Albrecht and Paul J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,” Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1220–1223 (1982)

  9. [9]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

  10. [10]

    Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), “Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A9 (2020), arXiv:1905.05697 [astro-ph.CO]

  11. [11]

    Chaussidon, C

    E. Chaussidonet al., “Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity with DESI 2024 LRG and QSO samples,” JCAP06, 029 (2025), arXiv:2411.17623 [astro-ph.CO]. 18

  12. [12]

    Chudaykin, M

    Anton Chudaykin, Mikhail M. Ivanov, and Oliver H. E. Philcox, “Reanalyzing DESI DR1. III. Constraints on inflation from galaxy power spectra and bispectra,” Phys. Rev. D113, 063552 (2026), arXiv:2512.04266 [astro-ph.CO]

  13. [13]

    The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model,

    Ya. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, “The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model,” Sov. Astron.10, 602 (1967)

  14. [14]

    Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,

    Stephen Hawking, “Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.152, 75 (1971)

  15. [15]

    Black holes in the early Universe,

    Bernard J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, “Black holes in the early Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.168, 399–415 (1974)

  16. [16]

    The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,

    Bernard J. Carr, “The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,” Astrophys. J.201, 1–19 (1975)

  17. [17]

    Primordial Black Holes - Perspectives in Gravitational Wave Astronomy -

    Misao Sasaki, Teruaki Suyama, Takahiro Tanaka, and Shuichiro Yokoyama, “Primordial black holes—perspectives in gravitational wave astronomy,” Class. Quant. Grav.35, 063001 (2018), arXiv:1801.05235 [astro-ph.CO]

  18. [18]

    Carr and F

    Bernard Carr and Florian Kuhnel, “Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 355–394 (2020), arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]

  19. [19]

    Constraints on Primordial Black Holes

    Bernard Carr, Kazunori Kohri, Yuuiti Sendouda, and Jun’ichi Yokoyama, “Constraints on primordial black holes,” Rept. Prog. Phys.84, 116902 (2021), arXiv:2002.12778 [astro-ph.CO]

  20. [20]

    Carr and F

    Bernard Carr and Florian Kuhnel, “Primordial black holes as dark matter candidates,” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes48, 1 (2022), arXiv:2110.02821 [astro-ph.CO]

  21. [21]

    Primordial Black Holes,

    Albert Escriv` a, Florian Kuhnel, and Yuichiro Tada, “Primordial Black Holes,” (2022), 10.1016/B978-0-32-395636- 9.00012-8, arXiv:2211.05767 [astro-ph.CO]

  22. [22]

    Observational evidence for primordial black holes: A positivist perspective,

    Bernard Carr, Sebastien Clesse, Juan Garcia-Bellido, Michael Hawkins, and Florian Kuhnel, “Observational evidence for primordial black holes: A positivist perspective,” Phys. Rept.1054, 1–68 (2024), arXiv:2306.03903 [astro-ph.CO]

  23. [23]

    Baumann, P.J

    Daniel Baumann, Paul J. Steinhardt, Keitaro Takahashi, and Kiyotomo Ichiki, “Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D76, 084019 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0703290

  24. [24]

    Ananda, C

    Kishore N. Ananda, Chris Clarkson, and David Wands, “The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D75, 123518 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612013

  25. [25]

    Kohri and T

    Kazunori Kohri and Takahiro Terada, “Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D97, 123532 (2018), arXiv:1804.08577 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    A Cosmological Signature of the SM Higgs Instability: Gravitational Waves

    Jos´ e Ram´ on Espinosa, Davide Racco, and Antonio Riotto, “A Cosmological Signature of the SM Higgs Instability: Gravitational Waves,” JCAP09, 012 (2018), arXiv:1804.07732 [hep-ph]

  27. [27]

    Dom` enech, Universe7, 398 (2021), arXiv:2109.01398 [gr-qc]

    Guillem Dom` enech, “Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review,” Universe7, 398 (2021), arXiv:2109.01398 [gr-qc]

  28. [28]

    Gravitational Waves Induced by non-Gaussian Scalar Perturbations,

    Rong-Gen Cai, Shi Pi, and Misao Sasaki, “Gravitational Waves Induced by non-Gaussian Scalar Perturbations,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201101 (2019), arXiv:1810.11000 [astro-ph.CO]

  29. [29]

    Unal, Phys

    Caner Unal, “Imprints of Primordial Non-Gaussianity on Gravitational Wave Spectrum,” Phys. Rev. D99, 041301 (2019), arXiv:1811.09151 [astro-ph.CO]

  30. [30]

    Adshead, K

    Peter Adshead, Kaloian D. Lozanov, and Zachary J. Weiner, “Non-Gaussianity and the induced gravitational wave background,” JCAP10, 080 (2021), arXiv:2105.01659 [astro-ph.CO]

  31. [31]

    Complete analysis of the background and anisotropies of scalar-induced gravitational waves: primordial non-Gaussianity f N L and g N L considered,

    Jun-Peng Li, Sai Wang, Zhi-Chao Zhao, and Kazunori Kohri, “Complete analysis of the background and anisotropies of scalar-induced gravitational waves: primordial non-Gaussianity f N L and g N L considered,” JCAP06, 039 (2024), arXiv:2309.07792 [astro-ph.CO]

  32. [32]

    Yuan, D.-S

    Chen Yuan, De-Shuang Meng, and Qing-Guo Huang, “Full analysis of the scalar-induced gravitational waves for the curvature perturbation with local-type non-Gaussianities,” JCAP12, 036 (2023), arXiv:2308.07155 [astro-ph.CO]

  33. [33]

    Isotropy, anisotropies and non-Gaussianity in the scalar-induced gravitational-wave background: diagrammatic approach for primordial non-Gaussianity up to arbitrary order

    Jun-Peng Li, Sai Wang, Zhi-Chao Zhao, and Kazunori Kohri, “Isotropy, anisotropies and non-Gaussianity in the scalar- induced gravitational-wave background: diagrammatic approach for primordial non-Gaussianity up to arbitrary order,” (2025), arXiv:2505.16820 [astro-ph.CO]

  34. [34]

    Perna, C

    Gabriele Perna, Chiara Testini, Angelo Ricciardone, and Sabino Matarrese, “Fully non-Gaussian Scalar-Induced Gravi- tational Waves,” JCAP05, 086 (2024), arXiv:2403.06962 [astro-ph.CO]

  35. [35]

    Scalar-induced gravitational waves with non-Gaussianity up to all orders

    Xiang-Xi Zeng, Zhuan Ning, Rong-Gen Cai, and Shao-Jiang Wang, “Scalar-induced gravitational waves with non- Gaussianity up to all orders,” (2025), arXiv:2508.10812 [astro-ph.CO]

  36. [36]

    Lattice simulations of scalar-induced gravitational waves from inflation

    Angelo Caravano, Gabriele Franciolini, and S´ ebastien Renaux-Petel, “Lattice simulations of scalar-induced gravitational waves from inflation,” (2026), arXiv:2604.03628 [astro-ph.CO]

  37. [37]

    Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,

    Alexei A. Starobinsky, “Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,” Phys. Lett. B117, 175–178 (1982)

  38. [38]

    Multicomponent de Sitter (Inflationary) Stages and the Generation of Perturbations,

    Alexei A. Starobinsky, “Multicomponent de Sitter (Inflationary) Stages and the Generation of Perturbations,” JETP Lett.42, 152–155 (1985)

  39. [39]

    A General Analytic Formula for the Spectral Index of the Density Perturbations produced during Inflation

    Misao Sasaki and Ewan D. Stewart, “A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturbations produced during inflation,” Prog. Theor. Phys.95, 71–78 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9507001

  40. [40]

    Super-Horizon Scale Dynamics of Multi-Scalar Inflation

    Misao Sasaki and Takahiro Tanaka, “Superhorizon scale dynamics of multiscalar inflation,” Prog. Theor. Phys.99, 763– 782 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9801017

  41. [41]

    A new approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales

    David Wands, Karim A. Malik, David H. Lyth, and Andrew R. Liddle, “A New approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales,” Phys. Rev. D62, 043527 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0003278

  42. [42]

    Conserved cosmological perturbations,

    David H. Lyth and David Wands, “Conserved cosmological perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D68, 103515 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0306498

  43. [43]

    The separate universe approach and the evolution of nonlinear superhorizon cosmological perturbations,

    G. I. Rigopoulos and E. P. S. Shellard, “The separate universe approach and the evolution of nonlinear superhorizon cosmological perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D68, 123518 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0306620

  44. [44]

    STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,

    Alexei A. Starobinsky, “STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,” Lect. 19 Notes Phys.246, 107–126 (1986)

  45. [45]

    Stochastic Stage of an Inflationary Universe Model,

    Yasusada Nambu and Misao Sasaki, “Stochastic Stage of an Inflationary Universe Model,” Phys. Lett. B205, 441–446 (1988)

  46. [46]

    Polarski and A

    David Polarski and Alexei A. Starobinsky, “Semiclassicality and decoherence of cosmological perturbations,” Class. Quant. Grav.13, 377–392 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9504030

  47. [47]

    Stochastic approach to chaotic inflation and the distribution of universes,

    Yasusada Nambu and Misao Sasaki, “Stochastic approach to chaotic inflation and the distribution of universes,” Phys. Lett. B219, 240–246 (1989)

  48. [48]

    STOCHASTIC INFLATION AS A TIME DEPENDENT RANDOM WALK,

    Henry E. Kandrup, “STOCHASTIC INFLATION AS A TIME DEPENDENT RANDOM WALK,” Phys. Rev. D39, 2245 (1989)

  49. [49]

    Stochastic Dynamics of an Inflationary Model and Initial Distribution of Universes,

    Yasusada Nambu, “Stochastic Dynamics of an Inflationary Model and Initial Distribution of Universes,” Prog. Theor. Phys.81, 1037 (1989)

  50. [50]

    Stochastic inflation in a simple two field model,

    Silvia Mollerach, Sabino Matarrese, Antonello Ortolan, and Francesco Lucchin, “Stochastic inflation in a simple two field model,” Phys. Rev. D44, 1670–1679 (1991)

  51. [51]

    Nonlinear Evolution of Long Wavelength Metric Fluctuations in Inflationary mMdels,

    D. S. Salopek and J. R. Bond, “Nonlinear Evolution of Long Wavelength Metric Fluctuations in Inflationary mMdels,” Phys. Rev. D42, 3936–3962 (1990)

  52. [52]

    From the Big Bang theory to the theory of a stationary universe

    Andrei D. Linde, Dmitri A. Linde, and Arthur Mezhlumian, “From the Big Bang theory to the theory of a stationary universe,” Phys. Rev. D49, 1783–1826 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9306035

  53. [53]

    Stochastic approach to inflation. 2. Classicality, coarse graining and noises,

    H. Casini, R. Montemayor, and P. Sisterna, “Stochastic approach to inflation. 2. Classicality, coarse graining and noises,” Phys. Rev. D59, 063512 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9811083

  54. [54]

    Generation of fluctuations during inflation: comparison of stochastic and field-theoretic approaches

    F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, A. A. Starobinsky, G. P. Vacca, and G. Venturi, “Generation of fluctuations during inflation: Comparison of stochastic and field-theoretic approaches,” Phys. Rev. D79, 044007 (2009), arXiv:0808.1786 [hep-th]

  55. [55]

    Stochastic growth of quantum fluctuations during slow-roll inflation

    F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, A. A. Starobinsky, G. P. Vacca, and G. Venturi, “Stochastic growth of quantum fluctuations during slow-roll inflation,” Phys. Rev. D82, 064020 (2010), arXiv:1003.1327 [hep-th]

  56. [56]

    Massive Primordial Black Holes from Hybrid Inflation as Dark Matter and the seeds of Galaxies

    S´ ebastien Clesse and Juan Garc´ ıa-Bellido, “Massive Primordial Black Holes from Hybrid Inflation as Dark Matter and the seeds of Galaxies,” Phys. Rev. D92, 023524 (2015), arXiv:1501.07565 [astro-ph.CO]

  57. [57]

    Assadullahi, H

    Hooshyar Assadullahi, Hassan Firouzjahi, Mahdiyar Noorbala, Vincent Vennin, and David Wands, “Multiple Fields in Stochastic Inflation,” JCAP06, 043 (2016), arXiv:1604.04502 [hep-th]

  58. [58]

    Vennin, H

    Vincent Vennin, Hooshyar Assadullahi, Hassan Firouzjahi, Mahdiyar Noorbala, and David Wands, “Critical Number of Fields in Stochastic Inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 031301 (2017), arXiv:1604.06017 [astro-ph.CO]

  59. [59]

    Pattison, V

    Chris Pattison, Vincent Vennin, Hooshyar Assadullahi, and David Wands, “Quantum diffusion during inflation and primordial black holes,” JCAP10, 046 (2017), arXiv:1707.00537 [hep-th]

  60. [60]

    Primordial Black Holes from Inflation and Quantum Diffusion

    Matteo Biagetti, Gabriele Franciolini, Alex Kehagias, and Antonio Riotto, “Primordial Black Holes from Inflation and Quantum Diffusion,” JCAP07, 032 (2018), arXiv:1804.07124 [astro-ph.CO]

  61. [61]

    Cruces, C

    Diego Cruces, Cristiano Germani, and Tomislav Prokopec, “Failure of the stochastic approach to inflation beyond slow- roll,” JCAP03, 048 (2019), arXiv:1807.09057 [gr-qc]

  62. [62]

    Ezquiaga, J

    Jose Mar´ ıa Ezquiaga, Juan Garc´ ıa-Bellido, and Vincent Vennin, “The exponential tail of inflationary fluctuations: consequences for primordial black holes,” JCAP03, 029 (2020), arXiv:1912.05399 [astro-ph.CO]

  63. [63]

    Prokopec and G

    Tomislav Prokopec and Gerasimos Rigopoulos, “∆N and the stochastic conveyor belt of ultra slow-roll inflation,” Phys. Rev. D104, 083505 (2021), arXiv:1910.08487 [gr-qc]

  64. [64]

    Pattison, V

    Chris Pattison, Vincent Vennin, Hooshyar Assadullahi, and David Wands, “Stochastic inflation beyond slow roll,” JCAP 07, 031 (2019), arXiv:1905.06300 [astro-ph.CO]

  65. [65]

    Ballesteros, J

    Guillermo Ballesteros, Juli´ an Rey, Marco Taoso, and Alfredo Urbano, “Stochastic inflationary dynamics beyond slow-roll and consequences for primordial black hole formation,” JCAP08, 043 (2020), arXiv:2006.14597 [astro-ph.CO]

  66. [66]

    Ando and V

    Kenta Ando and Vincent Vennin, “Power spectrum in stochastic inflation,” JCAP04, 057 (2021), arXiv:2012.02031 [astro-ph.CO]

  67. [67]

    Non-Gaussian Tail of the Curvature Perturbation in Stochastic Ultraslow-Roll Inflation: Implications for Primordial Black Hole Production,

    Daniel G. Figueroa, Sami Raatikainen, Syksy Rasanen, and Eemeli Tomberg, “Non-Gaussian Tail of the Curvature Perturbation in Stochastic Ultraslow-Roll Inflation: Implications for Primordial Black Hole Production,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 101302 (2021), arXiv:2012.06551 [astro-ph.CO]

  68. [68]

    Pattison, V

    Chris Pattison, Vincent Vennin, David Wands, and Hooshyar Assadullahi, “Ultra-slow-roll inflation with quantum diffusion,” JCAP04, 080 (2021), arXiv:2101.05741 [astro-ph.CO]

  69. [69]

    Primordial black holes and stochastic inflation beyond slow roll. Part I. Noise matrix elements,

    Swagat S. Mishra, Edmund J. Copeland, and Anne M. Green, “Primordial black holes and stochastic inflation beyond slow roll. Part I. Noise matrix elements,” JCAP09, 005 (2023), arXiv:2303.17375 [astro-ph.CO]

  70. [70]

    Rigopoulos and A

    Gerasimos Rigopoulos and Ashley Wilkins, “Inflation is always semi-classical: diffusion domination overproduces Primor- dial Black Holes,” JCAP12, 027 (2021), arXiv:2107.05317 [astro-ph.CO]

  71. [71]

    Tada and V

    Yuichiro Tada and Vincent Vennin, “Statistics of coarse-grained cosmological fields in stochastic inflation,” JCAP02, 021 (2022), arXiv:2111.15280 [astro-ph.CO]

  72. [72]

    Cruces and C

    Diego Cruces and Cristiano Germani, “Stochastic inflation at all order in slow-roll parameters: Foundations,” Phys. Rev. D105, 023533 (2022), arXiv:2107.12735 [gr-qc]

  73. [73]

    Implications of stochastic effects for primordial black hole production in ultra-slow-roll inflation,

    Daniel G. Figueroa, Sami Raatikainen, Syksy Rasanen, and Eemeli Tomberg, “Implications of stochastic effects for primordial black hole production in ultra-slow-roll inflation,” JCAP05, 027 (2022), arXiv:2111.07437 [astro-ph.CO]

  74. [74]

    Cruces, Review on Stochastic Approach to Inflation, 29 Universe8, 334 (2022), arXiv:2203.13852 [gr-qc]

    Diego Cruces, “Review on Stochastic Approach to Inflation,” Universe8, 334 (2022), arXiv:2203.13852 [gr-qc]

  75. [75]

    Tomberg, Stochastic constant-roll inflation and pri- mordial black holes, Phys

    Eemeli Tomberg, “Stochastic constant-roll inflation and primordial black holes,” Phys. Rev. D108, 043502 (2023), arXiv:2304.10903 [astro-ph.CO]

  76. [76]

    Primordial black holes from effective field theory 20 of stochastic single field inflation at NNNLO,

    Sayantan Choudhury, Ahaskar Karde, Pankaj Padiyar, and M. Sami, “Primordial black holes from effective field theory 20 of stochastic single field inflation at NNNLO,” Eur. Phys. J. C85, 21 (2025), arXiv:2403.13484 [astro-ph.CO]

  77. [77]

    Mizuguchi, T

    Yurino Mizuguchi, Tomoaki Murata, and Yuichiro Tada, “STOLAS: STOchastic LAttice Simulation of cosmic inflation,” JCAP12, 050 (2024), arXiv:2405.10692 [astro-ph.CO]

  78. [78]

    Jackson, H

    Joseph H. P. Jackson, Hooshyar Assadullahi, Andrew D. Gow, Kazuya Koyama, Vincent Vennin, and David Wands, “Stochastic inflation beyond slow roll: noise modelling and importance sampling,” JCAP04, 073 (2025), arXiv:2410.13683 [astro-ph.CO]

  79. [79]

    Cruces, C

    Diego Cruces, Cristiano Germani, Amin Nassiri-Rad, and Masahide Yamaguchi, “Small noise expansion of stochastic inflation,” JCAP04, 090 (2025), arXiv:2410.17987 [astro-ph.CO]

  80. [80]

    Stochastic inflation and non-perturbative power spectrum beyond slow roll,

    Devanshu Sharma, “Stochastic inflation and non-perturbative power spectrum beyond slow roll,” JCAP03, 017 (2025), arXiv:2411.08854 [astro-ph.CO]

Showing first 80 references.