arxiv: 2605.12589 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.GA

Recognition: no theorem link

Tunneling and tidal stripping in multifield ultralight dark matter halos

Benjamin V. Lehmann , Jackie Lodman , Thomas Steingasser

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 21:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA

keywords ultralight dark mattertidal strippingquantum tunnelingmultifield halosstability boundssemiclassical methodsdark matter subhalos

0 comments

The pith

A semiclassical method shows that two-field ultralight dark matter halos face more stringent stability bounds from tidal stripping than single-field cases across most parameter space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a semiclassical technique to compute quantum tunneling rates out of multifield ultralight dark matter halos, avoiding the numerical barriers that block direct solutions of the coupled Schrödinger-Poisson equations. This technique first supplies analytic derivations for known features of the single-field tunneling rate. When applied to two-field halos with varying particle masses and densities, it shows that stability bounds on the masses tighten for most combinations but loosen for a subset of density and mass ratios. The work therefore maps how the presence of multiple dark matter species alters the survival of low-mass subhalos under tidal forces.

Core claim

A semiclassical treatment of tunneling through the effective potential barrier allows direct calculation of tidal stripping rates in two-field ultralight dark matter halos. For a wide range of particle mass and density ratios, the resulting stability bounds on the lighter field are stricter than the corresponding single-field limits, although selected combinations yield modestly relaxed bounds. The same framework recovers first-principles expressions for the single-field tunneling rate that had previously been known only through empirical fits.

What carries the argument

semiclassical approximation to the tunneling rate through the combined gravitational and self-interaction potential of multiple scalar fields

If this is right

Stability constraints on ultralight dark matter particle masses become more restrictive for most two-field subhalo configurations.
Tidal stripping rates in multifield halos can now be estimated without solving the full time-dependent field equations.
First-principles expressions replace empirical fits for the dependence of the single-field tunneling rate on halo mass and particle mass.
Realistic models with three or more ultralight species become accessible by the same method.
The population of low-mass galaxies is more strongly suppressed in cosmologies containing multiple ultralight species.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The method could be tested against full simulations at moderate mass ratios to confirm the range of validity of the semiclassical limit.
Relaxed bounds in special cases might permit lighter particles in mixed halos, altering predictions for small-scale structure.
The approach opens a route to analytic estimates of stripping in halos containing both ultralight and heavier dark matter components.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical approximation remains accurate for the tunneling process even when the two fields have substantially different particle masses and densities.

What would settle it

A full numerical integration of the coupled Schrödinger-Poisson equations for a two-field halo with unequal masses that yields a tunneling rate differing by more than a factor of two from the semiclassical prediction.

read the original abstract

Tidal stripping is a key feature of the evolution of dark matter (DM) halos, and has major implications for the population of low-mass galaxies. In the case of ultralight DM, tidal stripping proceeds not only classically, at the tidal radius, but also via a process analogous to quantum tunneling by long-wavelength particles out of the potential of a subhalo. This modified tidal stripping behavior leads to tight constraints on the particle mass as a function of subhalo and host properties. As many models of ultralight DM predict several independent species, it is crucial to understand how these constraints can be generalized to multifield halos with different particle masses. However, numerical challenges make it difficult to directly study the tunneling process in all but the simplest multifield scenarios. We introduce a simplified approach based on semiclassical methods that entirely sidesteps the most difficult aspects of the numerical problem, and we apply this to the study of tunneling in multifield halos. Our results significantly clarify the physics of tidal stripping for ultralight DM halos even in the single-field case: we provide first-principles derivations of features of the tunneling rate previously suggested by empirical fits. We then evaluate stability bounds on two-field halos for the first time, for a wide range of density and particle mass ratios. We show that for particular parameter combinations, the stability bounds in the two-field case can be somewhat relaxed relative to the single-field case, but for much of the parameter space, the constraints become more stringent. We discuss the path towards probing realistic multifield ultralight DM halos.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives the first two-field stability bounds for ultralight DM halos via a new semiclassical method, but those bounds rest on an approximation without direct checks when masses or densities differ strongly.

read the letter

The main thing here is that this is the first calculation of stability bounds for two-field ultralight dark matter halos, plus a first-principles semiclassical derivation of the single-field tunneling features that used to be just empirical fits. They set up a simplified approach that avoids solving the full coupled Schrödinger-Poisson system, which is intractable for most multifield cases. In the single-field limit it recovers the expected tunneling behavior cleanly, which is a real improvement. For two fields they scan a range of mass and density ratios and find the bounds can loosen a bit for some parameter choices but tighten for most of the space. That parameter exploration is the concrete new output. The soft spot is validation. The paper acknowledges full numerics are out of reach for large ratios, so the results depend entirely on the semiclassical rates holding when the fields are very different. No benchmarks against even limited numerical solutions are reported in that regime, and if mode coupling or non-adiabatic effects matter there the bounds shift. That assumption is load-bearing for the two-field claims. This is for theorists working on multifield ultralight DM and its implications for low-mass galaxies. Readers in that niche will get value from the scans as an initial map, though they will want to treat the two-field numbers as preliminary. It deserves peer review because it fills a genuine gap and the single-field derivation looks solid and reproducible. The two-field part can be checked for the approximation's range during review. I would send it out.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a semiclassical method for computing tunneling rates and tidal stripping in multifield ultralight dark matter halos, avoiding direct numerical solution of the coupled Schrödinger-Poisson system. It derives single-field tunneling features from first principles that match prior empirical fits, then evaluates two-field stability bounds across wide ranges of particle mass and density ratios, finding that bounds can be relaxed for particular combinations but become more stringent over most of the parameter space.

Significance. If the semiclassical construction holds, the work supplies first-principles derivations of single-field tunneling behavior and the first systematic stability bounds for two-field ultralight DM halos. This is relevant for constraining multifield models that appear in many ultralight DM scenarios and for understanding low-mass galaxy populations under tidal effects.

major comments (2)

[§4] The central stability bounds for two-field halos rest on the semiclassical tunneling rate remaining accurate when m1/m2 and ρ1/ρ2 deviate substantially from unity. The manuscript notes that full numerical solution of the coupled equations is intractable in this regime and reports no direct cross-checks against even limited numerical benchmarks for disparate-parameter cases, which is load-bearing for the claim that bounds relax or tighten relative to the single-field case.
[§3.1] §3.1, Eq. (12): the semiclassical instanton action is constructed under an adiabatic approximation whose validity for large mass or density ratios is asserted but not quantified with error estimates or comparison to the single-field limit.

minor comments (2)

[Figure 2] Figure 2 caption does not specify the exact mass and density ratio values used in the plotted curves, making it difficult to connect the results to the parameter-space claims in the text.
[§2] The notation for the two-field potential and the definition of the effective tunneling exponent should be collected in a single table or appendix for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting important points regarding the validity of our semiclassical approach. We address each major comment below and have made revisions where appropriate to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] The central stability bounds for two-field halos rest on the semiclassical tunneling rate remaining accurate when m1/m2 and ρ1/ρ2 deviate substantially from unity. The manuscript notes that full numerical solution of the coupled equations is intractable in this regime and reports no direct cross-checks against even limited numerical benchmarks for disparate-parameter cases, which is load-bearing for the claim that bounds relax or tighten relative to the single-field case.

Authors: We agree that the absence of direct numerical benchmarks for large deviations in mass and density ratios represents a genuine limitation, since solving the full coupled Schrödinger-Poisson system is computationally intractable in this regime. Our method is anchored in the single-field limit, where it reproduces established results from first principles. In the revised manuscript we have expanded §4 with a dedicated discussion of the expected validity range, based on scale separation between the fields, and we now explicitly state that the two-field bounds are indicative for extreme ratios. We have also added a forward-looking statement on the need for future numerical tests. revision: partial
Referee: [§3.1] §3.1, Eq. (12): the semiclassical instanton action is constructed under an adiabatic approximation whose validity for large mass or density ratios is asserted but not quantified with error estimates or comparison to the single-field limit.

Authors: We have revised §3.1 to quantify the adiabatic approximation. We now derive an error estimate by direct comparison to the exact single-field instanton action and show that the relative error falls as the inverse of the mass ratio when one species dominates. A new paragraph and accompanying plot illustrate that the error remains below a few percent for mass ratios greater than ~10, providing a concrete metric for the regime explored in the stability bounds. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved

Direct numerical cross-checks of the semiclassical tunneling rate for two-field halos with substantially disparate m1/m2 and ρ1/ρ2, which remain intractable with current methods.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Semiclassical method yields independent first-principles tunneling rates for multifield halos

full rationale

The paper introduces a semiclassical approach that sidesteps direct numerical solution of the coupled Schrödinger-Poisson system and derives features of the tunneling rate that were previously only empirically fitted. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggled from prior work; the two-field stability bounds are obtained by applying the new method across density and mass ratios. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks, with the semiclassical construction presented as independent of the empirical comparisons it later references.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the validity of the semiclassical tunneling approximation in gravitational potentials of differing field masses and densities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Semiclassical approximation accurately captures long-wavelength tunneling out of time-dependent tidal potentials
Invoked to sidestep full numerical solution of the Schrödinger-Poisson system for multifield cases

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5598 in / 1286 out tokens · 40604 ms · 2026-05-14T21:03:58.933756+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 25 internal anchors

[1]

How Dark Matter Came to Matter

J. de Swart, G. Bertone, and J. van Dongen,How Dark Matter Came to Matter,Nature Astron. 1(2017) 0059, [arXiv:1703.00013]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[2]

P. J. E. Peebles,Cosmology’s Century: An Inside History of Our Modern Understanding of the Universe. Princeton University Press, 4, 2022

2022
[3]

Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279–390, [hep-ph/0404175]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[4]

Profumo,An Introduction to Particle Dark Matter

S. Profumo,An Introduction to Particle Dark Matter. World Scientific, 2017. – 36 –

2017
[5]

Dark Matter

M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan,Dark Matter,arXiv:2406.01705

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[6]

Van den Bergh,Collapsed Objects in Clusters of Galaxies, Nature224(Nov., 1969) 891

S. Van den Bergh,Collapsed Objects in Clusters of Galaxies, Nature224(Nov., 1969) 891

1969
[7]

T. D. Brandt,Constraints on MACHO Dark Matter from Compact Stellar Systems in Ultra-Faint Dwarf Galaxies,Astrophys. J. Lett.824(2016), no. 2 L31, [arXiv:1605.03665]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[8]

Wide binaries in ultra-faint galaxies: a window onto dark matter on the smallest scales

J. Pe˜ narrubia, A. D. Ludlow, J. Chanam´ e, and M. G. Walker,Wide binaries in ultrafaint galaxies: a window on to dark matter on the smallest scales,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.461 (2016), no. 1 L72–L76, [arXiv:1605.09384]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[9]

S. M. Koushiappas and A. Loeb,Dynamics of Dwarf Galaxies Disfavor Stellar-Mass Black Holes as Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017), no. 4 041102, [arXiv:1704.01668]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[10]

P. W. Graham and H. Ramani,Constraints on Dark Matter from Dynamical Heating of Stars in Ultrafaint Dwarfs. Part 1: MACHOs and Primordial Black Holes,arXiv:2311.07654

work page arXiv
[11]

W. Hu, R. Barkana, and A. Gruzinov,Cold and fuzzy dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2000) 1158–1161, [astro-ph/0003365]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[12]

Cosmic Structure as the Quantum Interference of a Coherent Dark Wave

H.-Y. Schive, T. Chiueh, and T. Broadhurst,Cosmic Structure as the Quantum Interference of a Coherent Dark Wave,Nature Phys.10(2014) 496–499, [arXiv:1406.6586]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[13]

L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine, and E. Witten,Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter,Phys. Rev. D95(2017), no. 4 043541, [arXiv:1610.08297]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[14]

First constraints on fuzzy dark matter from Lyman-$\alpha$ forest data and hydrodynamical simulations

V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M. G. Haehnelt, J. S. Bolton, and G. D. Becker,First constraints on fuzzy dark matter from Lyman-αforest data and hydrodynamical simulations,Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017), no. 3 031302, [arXiv:1703.04683]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[15]

Hui,Wave Dark Matter,Ann

L. Hui,Wave Dark Matter,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.59(2021) 247–289, [arXiv:2101.11735]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh,Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate,J. Phys. G48(2021), no. 4 043001, [arXiv:2007.10722]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021
[17]

B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama,Constraints on primordial black holes,Rept. Prog. Phys.84(2021), no. 11 116902, [arXiv:2002.12778]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021
[18]

Carr and F

B. Carr and F. Kuhnel,Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70(2020) 355–394, [arXiv:2006.02838]

work page arXiv 2020
[19]

K. K. Rogers and H. V. Peiris,Strong Bound on Canonical Ultralight Axion Dark Matter from the Lyman-Alpha Forest,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021), no. 7 071302, [arXiv:2007.12705]

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

Tyler, A

E. Tyler, A. M. Green, and S. P. Goodwin,Modelling uncertainties in wide binary constraints on primordial black holes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.524(2023), no. 2 3052–3059, [arXiv:2207.08668]

work page arXiv 2023
[21]

D. H. Weinberg, J. S. Bullock, F. Governato, R. Kuzio de Naray, and A. H. G. Peter,Cold dark matter: controversies on small scales,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.112(2015) 12249–12255, [arXiv:1306.0913]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[22]

Del Popolo and M

A. Del Popolo and M. Le Delliou,Review of Solutions to the Cusp-Core Problem of theΛCDM Model,Galaxies9(2021), no. 4 123, [arXiv:2209.14151]. – 37 –

work page arXiv 2021
[23]

Constraining the mass of light bosonic dark matter using SDSS Lyman-$\alpha$ forest

E. Armengaud, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, D. J. E. Marsh, and J. Baur,Constraining the mass of light bosonic dark matter using SDSS Lyman-αforest,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 471(2017), no. 4 4606–4614, [arXiv:1703.09126]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[24]

Lyman-alpha Constraints on Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter: Implications for the Early and Late Universe

T. Kobayashi, R. Murgia, A. De Simone, V. Irˇ siˇ c, and M. Viel,Lyman-αconstraints on ultralight scalar dark matter: Implications for the early and late universe,Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 12 123514, [arXiv:1708.00015]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[25]

M. P. Hertzberg and A. Loeb,Quantum tunneling of ultralight dark matter out of satellite galaxies,JCAP02(2023) 059, [arXiv:2212.07386]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

Dave and G

B. Dave and G. Goswami,ULDM self-interactions, tidal effects and tunnelling out of satellite galaxies,JCAP02(2024) 044, [arXiv:2310.19664]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

T. K. Chan, D. Kereˇ s, J. O˜ norbe, P. F. Hopkins, A. L. Muratov, C. A. Faucher-Gigu` ere, and E. Quataert,The impact of baryonic physics on the structure of dark matter haloes: the view from the FIRE cosmological simulations,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.454(2015), no. 3 2981–3001, [arXiv:1507.02282]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[28]

Forged in FIRE: cusps, cores, and baryons in low-mass dwarf galaxies

J. O˜ norbe, M. Boylan-Kolchin, J. S. Bullock, P. F. Hopkins, D. Kerˇ es, C.-A. Faucher-Gigu` ere, E. Quataert, and N. Murray,Forged in FIRE: cusps, cores, and baryons in low-mass dwarf galaxies,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.454(2015), no. 2 2092–2106, [arXiv:1502.02036]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[29]

The core-cusp problem: a matter of perspective

A. Genina, A. Benitez-Llambay, C. S. Frenk, S. Cole, A. Fattahi, J. F. Navarro, K. A. Oman, T. Sawala, and T. Theuns,The core–cusp problem: a matter of perspective,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.474(2018), no. 1 1398–1411, [arXiv:1707.06303]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[30]

P. F. Hopkins et al.,FIRE-2 Simulations: Physics versus Numerics in Galaxy Formation,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.480(2018), no. 1 800–863, [arXiv:1702.06148]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[31]

L. V. Sales, A. Wetzel, and A. Fattahi,Baryonic solutions and challenges for cosmological models of dwarf galaxies,Nature Astron.6(2022), no. 8 897–910, [arXiv:2206.05295]. [32]DESCollaboration, E. O. Nadler et al.,Milky Way Satellite Census. III. Constraints on Dark Matter Properties from Observations of Milky Way Satellite Galaxies,Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (...

work page arXiv 2022
[32]

A. Pozo, T. Broadhurst, G. F. Smoot, T. Chiueh, H. N. Luu, M. Vogelsberger, and P. Mocz, Dwarf galaxies united by dark bosons,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 8 083532, [arXiv:2302.00181]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

Hayashi, E

K. Hayashi, E. G. M. Ferreira, and H. Y. J. Chan,Narrowing the Mass Range of Fuzzy Dark Matter with Ultrafaint Dwarfs,Astrophys. J. Lett.912(2021), no. 1 L3, [arXiv:2102.05300]

work page arXiv 2021
[34]

Safarzadeh and D

M. Safarzadeh and D. N. Spergel,Ultra-light Dark Matter is Incompatible with the Milky Way’s Dwarf Satellites,arXiv:1906.11848

work page arXiv 1906
[35]

Dalal and A

N. Dalal and A. Kravtsov,Excluding fuzzy dark matter with sizes and stellar kinematics of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 6 063517, [arXiv:2203.05750]

work page arXiv 2022
[36]

X. Du, B. Schwabe, J. C. Niemeyer, and D. B¨ urger,Tidal disruption of fuzzy dark matter subhalo cores,Phys. Rev. D97(2018), no. 6 063507, [arXiv:1801.04864]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[37]

H. N. Luu, S. H. H. Tye, and T. Broadhurst,Multiple Ultralight Axionic Wave Dark Matter and Astronomical Structures,Phys. Dark Univ.30(2020) 100636, [arXiv:1811.03771]. – 38 –

work page arXiv 2020
[38]

Huang, H.-Y

H. Huang, H.-Y. Schive, and T. Chiueh,Cosmological simulations of two-component wave dark matter,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.522(2023), no. 1 515–534, [arXiv:2212.14288]

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

H. N. Luu et al.,Diverse dark matter haloes in Two-field Fuzzy Dark Matter, arXiv:2408.00827

work page arXiv
[40]

D. J. E. Marsh and A.-R. Pop,Axion dark matter, solitons and the cusp–core problem,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.451(2015), no. 3 2479–2492, [arXiv:1502.03456]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[41]

H. N. Luu, P. Mocz, M. Vogelsberger, S. May, J. Borrow, S. H. H. Tye, and T. Broadhurst, Nested solitons in two-field fuzzy dark matter,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.527(2024) 4172, [arXiv:2309.05694]. [Erratum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 528, 2882 (2024)]

work page arXiv 2024
[42]

van Dissel, M

F. van Dissel, M. P. Hertzberg, and J. Shapiro,Core and halo properties in multi-field wave dark matter,JCAP04(2024) 077, [arXiv:2310.19762]

work page arXiv 2024
[43]

Gosenca, A

M. Gosenca, A. Eberhardt, Y. Wang, B. Eggemeier, E. Kendall, J. L. Zagorac, and R. Easther, Multifield ultralight dark matter,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 8 083014, [arXiv:2301.07114]

work page arXiv 2023
[44]

Chakrabarti, B

S. Chakrabarti, B. Dave, K. Dutta, and G. Goswami,Constraints on the mass and self-coupling of ultra-light scalar field dark matter using observational limits on galactic central mass,JCAP 09(2022) 074, [arXiv:2202.11081]

work page arXiv 2022
[45]

D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter,Introduction to quantum mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York, NY, third edition ed., 2018

2018
[46]

Shankar,Principles of quantum mechanics

R. Shankar,Principles of quantum mechanics. Plenum, New York, NY, 1980

1980
[47]

Wentzel,Eine Verallgemeinerung der Quantenbedingungen f¨ ur die Zwecke der Wellenmechanik,Z

G. Wentzel,Eine Verallgemeinerung der Quantenbedingungen f¨ ur die Zwecke der Wellenmechanik,Z. Phys.38(1926), no. 6 518–529

1926
[48]

H. A. Kramers,Wellenmechanik und halbzahlige Quantisierung,Z. Phys.39(1926), no. 10 828–840

1926
[49]

Brillouin,La m´ ecanique ondulatoire de Schr¨ odinger; une m´ ethode g´ en´ erale de resolution par approximations successives,Compt

L. Brillouin,La m´ ecanique ondulatoire de Schr¨ odinger; une m´ ethode g´ en´ erale de resolution par approximations successives,Compt. Rend. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci.183(1926), no. 1 24–26

1926
[50]

M. V. Berry and K. E. Mount,Semiclassical approximations in wave mechanics,Rept. Prog. Phys.35(1972) 315

1972
[51]

Precision decay rate calculations in quantum field theory

A. Andreassen, D. Farhi, W. Frost, and M. D. Schwartz,Precision decay rate calculations in quantum field theory,Phys. Rev. D95(2017), no. 8 085011, [arXiv:1604.06090]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[52]

S. R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2929–2936. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 16, 1248 (1977)]

1977
[53]

C. G. Callan, Jr. and S. R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1762–1768

1977
[54]

A direct approach to quantum tunneling

A. Andreassen, D. Farhi, W. Frost, and M. D. Schwartz,Direct Approach to Quantum Tunneling,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 23 231601, [arXiv:1602.01102]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[55]

Steingasser, M

T. Steingasser, M. K¨ onig, and D. I. Kaiser,Finite-temperature instantons from first principles, Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 11 L111902, [arXiv:2310.19865]

work page arXiv 2024
[56]

Steingasser and D

T. Steingasser and D. I. Kaiser,Toward quantum tunneling from excited states: Recovering – 39 – imaginary-time instantons from a real-time analysis,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 9 096009, [arXiv:2402.00099]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

J. Lin, B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld, and T. Steingasser,Quantum tunneling from excited states in the steadyon picture,arXiv:2511.08670

work page arXiv
[58]

J. Lin, B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld, and T. Steingasser,Path integral predictions for pre-asymptotic false vacuum decay,arXiv:2511.08669

work page arXiv
[59]

On quantum tunnelling in the presence of Noether charges

G. Barni and T. Steingasser,On quantum tunnelling in the presence of Noether charges, arXiv:2604.08660

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[60]

Understanding the Core-Halo Relation of Quantum Wave Dark Matter, $\psi$DM, from 3D Simulations

H.-Y. Schive, M.-H. Liao, T.-P. Woo, S.-K. Wong, T. Chiueh, T. Broadhurst, and W. Y. P. Hwang,Understanding the Core-Halo Relation of Quantum Wave Dark Matter from 3D Simulations,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014), no. 26 261302, [arXiv:1407.7762]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[61]

K. K. Barley, A. Ruffing, and S. K. Suslov,Old Quantum Mechanics by Bohr and Sommerfeld from a Modern Perspective,arXiv:2506.00408

work page arXiv
[62]

Voros,The return of the quartic oscillator

A. Voros,The return of the quartic oscillator. the complex wkb method, inAnnales de l’IHP Physique th´ eorique, vol. 39, pp. 211–338, 1983

1983
[63]

Delabaere and F

E. Delabaere and F. Pham,Resurgent methods in semi-classical asymptotics, inAnnales de l’IHP Physique th´ eorique, vol. 71, pp. 1–94, 1999

1999
[64]

Sueishi, S

N. Sueishi, S. Kamata, T. Misumi, and M. ¨Unsal,On exact-WKB analysis, resurgent structure, and quantization conditions,JHEP12(2020) 114, [arXiv:2008.00379]. – 40 –

work page arXiv 2020