pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.05502 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-05 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat· nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Electromagnetic polarizabilities of the triplet hadrons in heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory

Hao Dang , Liang-Zhen Wen , Yan-Ke Chen , Shi-Lin Zhu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 07:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-th
keywords electromagnetic polarizabilitiesheavy hadron chiral perturbation theoryD* mesonspion loopsheavy diquark symmetrysingly heavy mesonsdoubly heavy baryons
0
0 comments X

The pith

Heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory predicts giant electric polarizabilities for D* mesons due to near-degenerate mass with D pi.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory up to order p cubed to compute electromagnetic polarizabilities of singly heavy mesons and doubly heavy baryons. Low-energy constants are estimated from the non-relativistic constituent quark model. The calculation shows that the D star mesons possess exceptionally large electric polarizabilities because their masses lie close to the D pi threshold, producing strong cusp structures in the pion loop integrals. These values exceed those of the corresponding bottom mesons by orders of magnitude. The work further demonstrates strong flavor dependence in the baryon sector and uses heavy diquark-antiquark symmetry to connect the meson and baryon descriptions in the heavy quark limit.

Core claim

Within heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory the electromagnetic polarizabilities of triplet hadrons receive dominant contributions from pion loops. For the D star mesons the near degeneracy between the D star and D pi masses generates giant electric polarizabilities of approximately 291.4 times 10 to the minus four fm cubed for the neutral state and a complex value with imaginary part for the charged state. These results are orders of magnitude larger than those of the bottom counterparts. For doubly heavy baryons the polarizabilities vary markedly with heavy flavor content owing to mixing with scalar diquark states. Heavy diquark-antiquark symmetry unifies the chiral dynamics of singly,

What carries the argument

Pion loop contributions in heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory to order p cubed, with low-energy constants fixed via the non-relativistic constituent quark model and heavy diquark-antiquark symmetry for unification of mesons and baryons.

Load-bearing premise

The non-relativistic constituent quark model supplies accurate values for the low-energy constants even near the D star to D pi threshold.

What would settle it

A lattice QCD calculation of the electric polarizability of the neutral D star meson that yields a value far below 291.4 times 10 to the minus four fm cubed would falsify the predicted enhancement from the mass degeneracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.05502 by Hao Dang, Liang-Zhen Wen, Shi-Lin Zhu, Yan-Ke Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The Born and loop diagrams contribute to the electromagnetic polarizabilities of pseudoscalar mesons [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The Born and loop diagrams contribute to the electromagnetic polarizabilities of vector mesons (spin- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the electromagnetic polarizabilities of singly heavy mesons and doubly heavy baryons within the framework of heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory up to $\mathcal{O}(p^3)$. We estimate the low-energy constants using the non-relativistic constituent quark model. A striking prediction of our study is the giant electric polarizabilities of the $D^*$ mesons: $\alpha_E(\bar{D}^{*0}) \approx 291.4 \times 10^{-4} \text{fm}^3$ and $\alpha_E(D^{*-}) \approx -0.4-64.4 i \times 10^{-4} \text{fm}^3$. These anomalously large values arise from the near-degenerate mass between $D^*$ and $D \pi$, which are orders of magnitude larger than those of their bottom counterparts. This kinematic coincidence induces a pronounced cusp structure in the chiral loops, reflecting the long-range dynamics of a pion cloud. For doubly heavy baryons, polarizabilities depend strongly on heavy-flavor composition: the $bcq$ system differs markedly from $ccq$ and $bbq$ due to mixing with scalar heavy-diquark states. Using heavy diquark-antiquark symmetry (HDAS), we unify the chiral dynamics of singly heavy mesons and doubly heavy baryons in the heavy-quark limit. The pion-loop contributions dominate the electromagnetic structure of heavy hadrons and provide essential benchmarks for future lattice QCD simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes electromagnetic polarizabilities of singly heavy mesons and doubly heavy baryons in heavy-hadron chiral perturbation theory to O(p^3). Low-energy constants are estimated from a non-relativistic constituent quark model. The central claim is the prediction of giant electric polarizabilities for the D* mesons (α_E(D̄*0) ≈ 291.4 × 10^{-4} fm³ and a complex value for D*-) driven by the near-degenerate D*–Dπ threshold that produces a pronounced cusp in the chiral loops; results for bottom counterparts are smaller, while doubly heavy baryons show strong flavor dependence, all unified via heavy diquark-antiquark symmetry. The pion-loop contributions are presented as benchmarks for future lattice QCD.

Significance. If the numerical results hold after proper validation of the input LECs, the work supplies concrete, falsifiable predictions that highlight the dominant role of near-threshold pion-cloud dynamics in heavy-hadron electromagnetic structure and offers a useful organizational framework via HDAS for relating mesons and baryons.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the headline numerical claims α_E(D̄*0) ≈ 291.4 × 10^{-4} fm³ and α_E(D*-) ≈ -0.4-64.4 i × 10^{-4} fm³ are obtained from O(p^3) loop integrals whose magnitude is fixed by LECs taken from a non-relativistic constituent quark model; no error bars, variation of those LECs within plausible ranges, or independent cross-check (lattice or dispersion) is supplied for the kinematic regime where m(D*)–m(D)–m(π) ≈ 7 MeV.
  2. [Numerical results] Section on LEC determination and numerical evaluation: the paper states that the giant polarizabilities arise from the near-degenerate mass difference inducing a cusp, yet supplies no convergence test with respect to higher-order chiral terms or sensitivity of the loop integrals to O(1) shifts in the quark-model LECs, which would alter the quoted values by a factor of several.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Title and abstract] The title refers to 'triplet hadrons' while the abstract discusses both mesons and baryons; a short clarifying sentence on the spin-triplet content would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we plan to incorporate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the headline numerical claims α_E(D̄*0) ≈ 291.4 × 10^{-4} fm³ and α_E(D*-) ≈ -0.4-64.4 i × 10^{-4} fm³ are obtained from O(p^3) loop integrals whose magnitude is fixed by LECs taken from a non-relativistic constituent quark model; no error bars, variation of those LECs within plausible ranges, or independent cross-check (lattice or dispersion) is supplied for the kinematic regime where m(D*)–m(D)–m(π) ≈ 7 MeV.

    Authors: The quoted values are the direct output of our O(p^3) calculation in heavy-hadron chiral perturbation theory with LECs fixed by the non-relativistic constituent quark model. The dominant enhancement is driven by the kinematic cusp from the near-threshold D*–Dπ splitting, a feature that is robust against moderate LEC variations. We will revise the abstract to explicitly note the model dependence of the LECs and the leading-order character of the result, while retaining the central numbers as illustrative predictions. A quantitative error analysis and independent cross-checks lie beyond the present scope but are identified as future benchmarks. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Numerical results] Section on LEC determination and numerical evaluation: the paper states that the giant polarizabilities arise from the near-degenerate mass difference inducing a cusp, yet supplies no convergence test with respect to higher-order chiral terms or sensitivity of the loop integrals to O(1) shifts in the quark-model LECs, which would alter the quoted values by a factor of several.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit sensitivity study and discussion of convergence are needed to assess robustness. The cusp is a leading kinematic effect, but O(1) changes in the LECs can rescale the loop contributions. We will add a new subsection that (i) varies the relevant LECs by ±30 % around the quark-model central values and tabulates the resulting range for the polarizabilities, and (ii) estimates the size of O(p^4) corrections via naive dimensional analysis, noting that the threshold enhancement may slow convergence. These additions will quantify the uncertainties without altering the central claims. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Independent cross-checks from lattice QCD or dispersion relations in the near-threshold regime, which require separate non-perturbative computations outside the present HHChPT framework.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external quark-model LEC estimates and kinematic inputs

full rationale

The paper computes electromagnetic polarizabilities in HHChPT up to O(p^3) after estimating LECs via the non-relativistic constituent quark model (an external framework). The giant D* values are attributed to the experimentally known near-degeneracy m(D*)-m(D)-m(π)≈7 MeV inducing a cusp in the loop integrals. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction; the numerical results follow from standard chiral loop expressions once LECs and masses are inserted. The quark-model step is a parameter estimation, not a redefinition of the target observable, and the central claim remains independent of any internal data fit or self-referential uniqueness theorem.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the validity of HHChPT to O(p^3), the heavy diquark-antiquark symmetry, and low-energy constants taken from a constituent quark model fit.

free parameters (1)
  • low-energy constants
    Estimated from non-relativistic constituent quark model matching
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory is valid up to O(p^3) for these systems
    Framework invoked throughout the abstract
  • domain assumption Heavy diquark-antiquark symmetry (HDAS) unifies meson and baryon chiral dynamics
    Used to relate singly heavy mesons to doubly heavy baryons

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5581 in / 1442 out tokens · 29709 ms · 2026-05-16T07:27:47.993931+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    As a result, these diagrams do not contribute to the electromagnetic polarizabilities

    cancels exactly with its crossed counterpart. As a result, these diagrams do not contribute to the electromagnetic polarizabilities. However, the magnetic transition diagrams involving the P P ∗γ vertex, shown in Fig. 1(b2) and Fig. 2(b′ 2), provide finite contributions. These diagrams correspond to two consecutive magnetic dipole transitions and contribu...

    work page

  2. [2]

    However, the bcq system, composed of non-identical heavy quarks, exhibits a distinct behavior

    vanish due to the exact cancellation with their crossed diagrams. However, the bcq system, composed of non-identical heavy quarks, exhibits a distinct behavior. The mass splitting δ1 between the spin-1/2 ground states T and B induces a finite contribution through the intermediate transitions shown in Fig. 1(b1) U (b1) T (ω) = − e2C 2 T B ω2 2M 2 N δ1 δ2 1...

    work page

  3. [3]

    can be expressed in a unified form: α(b2) E (T ) = α(b2) E (B) = α(b′ 2) E (B∗) = 0 β(b2) M (T ) = αemC 2 T B ∗ 12M 2 N 1 δ2 β(b2) M (B) = αemC 2 BB∗ 12M 2 N 1 δ β(b′ 2) M (B∗) = − αemC 2 B∗T 24M 2 N 1 δ2 − αemC 2 B∗B 24M 2 N 1 δ (37) The results of loop diagrams are also shown in Appendix B. A. NUMERICAL RESULTS Since experimental data for doubly heavy b...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A 96, 327 (1979)

    S. Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A 96, 327 (1979)

    work page 1979

  5. [5]

    E. E. Jenkins and A. V. Manohar, Baryon chiral perturbation theory using a heavy fermion Lagrangian, Phys. Lett. B 255, 558 (1991)

    work page 1991

  6. [6]

    Bernard, N

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, J. Kambor, and U. G. Meissner, Chiral structure of the nucleon, Nucl. Phys. B 388, 315 (1992)

    work page 1992

  7. [7]

    T. R. Hemmert, B. R. Holstein, and J. Kambor, Chiral Lagrangians and delta(1232) interactions: Formalism, J. Phys. G 24, 1831 (1998) , arXiv:hep-ph/9712496. 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    M. A. Ivanov, V. E. Lyubovitskij, J. G. Körner, and P. Kroll, Heavy baryon transitions in a relativistic three-quark model, Phys. Rev. D 56, 348 (1997)

    work page 1997

  9. [9]

    M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Körner, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and A. G. Rusetsky, Strong and radiative decays of heavy flavored baryons, Phys. Rev. D 60, 094002 (1999)

    work page 1999

  10. [10]

    Tawfiq, J

    S. Tawfiq, J. G. Körner, and P. J. O’Donnell, Electromagnetic transitions of heavy baryons in the SU (2N f ) ⊗ o(3) symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 63, 034005 (2001)

    work page 2001

  11. [11]

    Kumar, R

    S. Kumar, R. Dhir, and R. C. Verma, Magnetic moments of charm baryons using effective mass and screened charge of quarks, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 31, 141 (2005)

    work page 2005

  12. [12]

    Faessler, T

    A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Körner, V. E. Lyubovitskij, D. Nicmorus, and K. Pumsa-ard, Magnetic moments of heavy baryons in the relativistic three-quark model, Phys. Rev. D 73, 094013 (2006)

    work page 2006

  13. [13]

    Sharma, H

    N. Sharma, H. Dahiya, P. K. Chatley, and M. Gupta, Spin 1 2 + , spin 3 2 + , and transition magnetic moments of low lying and charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 81, 073001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Spectroscopy and decay properties of $\Sigma_{b}, \Lambda_{b}$ baryons in quark-diquark model

    A. Majethiya, K. Thakkar, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Spectroscopy and decay properties of Σb, Λb baryons in quark–diquark model, Chin. J. Phys. 54, 495 (2016) , arXiv:1102.4160 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Wang, Y.-X

    K.-L. Wang, Y.-X. Yao, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Strong and radiative decays of the low-lying s- and p-wave singly heavy baryons, Phys. Rev. D 96, 116016 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Hazra, S

    A. Hazra, S. Rakshit, and R. Dhir, Radiative m1 transitions of heavy baryons: Effective quark mass scheme, Phys. Rev. D 104, 053002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Sucipto and R

    E. Sucipto and R. L. Thews, Radiative-decay systematics and flavor-symmetry breaking from heavy quarks, Phys. Rev. D 36, 2074 (1987)

    work page 2074

  18. [18]

    Jaus, Semileptonic, radiative, and pionic decays of B, B* and D, D* mesons, Phys

    W. Jaus, Semileptonic, radiative, and pionic decays of B, B* and D, D* mesons, Phys. Rev. D 53, 1349 (1996) , [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 54, 5904 (1996)]

    work page 1996

  19. [19]

    Choi, Decay constants and radiative decays of heavy mesons in light-front quark model, Phys

    H.-M. Choi, Decay constants and radiative decays of heavy mesons in light-front quark model, Phys. Rev. D 75, 073016 (2007)

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    Priyadarsini, P

    M. Priyadarsini, P. C. Dash, S. Kar, S. P. Patra, and N. Barik, Electromagnetic form factors of heavy flavored vector mesons, Phys. Rev. D 94, 113011 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    M. A. Ivanov and Y. M. Valit, Radiative and hadronic decays of heavy vector mesons, Z. Phys. C 67, 633 (1995)

    work page 1995

  22. [22]

    S. K. Bose and L. P. Singh, Magnetic moments of charmed and b-flavored hadrons in the mit bag model, Phys. Rev. D 22, 773 (1980)

    work page 1980

  23. [23]

    Improved predictions for magnetic moments and M1 decay widths of heavy hadrons

    V. Simonis, Improved predictions for magnetic moments and M1 decay widths of heavy hadrons, (2018), arXiv:1803.01809 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Magnetic moments of heavy baryons in the bag model reexamined

    A. Bernotas and V. Simonis, Magnetic moments of heavy baryons in the bag model reexamined 10.3952/physics.v53i2.2668 (2012), arXiv:1209.2900 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3952/physics.v53i2.2668 2012

  25. [25]

    Bernotas and V

    A. Bernotas and V. Šimonis, Radiative m1 transitions of heavy baryons in the bag model, Phys. Rev. D 87, 074016 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Zhang, H

    W.-X. Zhang, H. Xu, and D. Jia, Masses and magnetic moments of hadrons with one and two open heavy quarks: Heavy baryons and tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114011 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    J. L. Goity and W. Roberts, Radiative transitions in heavy mesons in a relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D 64, 094007 (2001)

    work page 2001

  28. [28]

    Radiative M1-decays of heavy-light mesons in the relativistic quark model

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Radiative M1 decays of heavy light mesons in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Lett. B 537, 241 (2002) , arXiv:hep-ph/0204089

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  29. [29]

    Agamaliev, T

    A. Agamaliev, T. Aliev, and M. Savcı, Radiative decays of negative parity heavy baryons in the framework of the light cone qcd sum rules, Nuclear Physics A 958, 38 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    T. M. ALIEV, M. SA VCI, and V. S. ZAMIRALOV, Vector meson dominance and radiative decays of heavy spin-3/2 baryons to heavy spin-1/2 baryons, Modern Physics Letters A 27, 1250054 (2012) , https://doi.org/10.1142/S021773231250054X

    work page doi:10.1142/s021773231250054x 2012

  31. [31]

    T. M. Aliev, E. Iltan, and N. K. Pak, Radiative D* meson decays in QCD sum rules, Phys. Lett. B 334, 169 (1994)

    work page 1994

  32. [32]

    H. G. Dosch and S. Narison, B* B pi (gamma) couplings and D* – > D pi (gamma) decays within a 1/M expansion in full QCD, Phys. Lett. B 368, 163 (1996) , arXiv:hep-ph/9510212

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  33. [33]

    (D* to D + gamma) and (B* to B + gamma) as derived from QCD Sum Rules

    S.-L. Zhu, W.-Y. P. Hwang, and Z.-s. Yang, D* — > D gamma and B* — > B gamma as derived from QCD sum rules, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 12, 3027 (1997) , arXiv:hep-ph/9610412

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  34. [34]

    The Sigma_c and Lamda_c magnetic moments from QCD spectral sum rules

    S.-L. Zhu, W.-Y. P. Hwang, and Z.-S. Yang, The Σc and Λc magnetic moments from QCD spectral sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 56, 7273 (1997) , arXiv:hep-ph/9708411

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  35. [35]

    Radiative decays of heavy hadrons from light cone QCD sum rules in the leading order of HQET

    S.-L. Zhu and Y.-B. Dai, Radiative decays of heavy hadrons from light cone QCD sum rules in the leading order of HQET, Phys. Rev. D 59, 114015 (1999) , arXiv:hep-ph/9810243

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  36. [36]

    Scholl and H

    S. Scholl and H. Weigel, Magnetic moments of baryons with a single heavy quark, Nucl. Phys. A 735, 163 (2004) , arXiv:hep- ph/0312282

    work page arXiv 2004

  37. [37]

    Oh, D.-P

    Y.-s. Oh, D.-P. Min, M. Rho, and N. N. Scoccola, Massive quark baryons as skyrmions: Magnetic moments, Nucl. Phys. A 534, 493 (1991)

    work page 1991

  38. [38]

    Magnetic moments of heavy baryons in the Skyrme model

    Y.-s. Oh and B.-Y. Park, Magnetic moments of heavy baryons in the skyrme model, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 11, 653 (1996) , arXiv:hep-ph/9505269

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  39. [39]

    Kim, H.-C

    J.-Y. Kim, H.-C. Kim, G.-S. Yang, and M. Oka, Electromagnetic transitions of the singly charmed baryons with spin 3/2, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074025 (2021) , arXiv:2101.10653 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Xu, The electromagnetic form factors of heavy-light pseudo-scalar and vector mesons, JHEP 07, 118, arXiv:2402.06141 [hep-ph]

    Y.-Z. Xu, The electromagnetic form factors of heavy-light pseudo-scalar and vector mesons, JHEP 07, 118, arXiv:2402.06141 [hep-ph]. 19

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Cheng, C.-Y

    H.-Y. Cheng, C.-Y. Cheung, G.-L. Lin, Y. C. Lin, T.-M. Yan, and H.-L. Yu, Chiral lagrangians for radiative decays of heavy hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1030 (1993)

    work page 1993

  42. [42]

    Cho, Strong and electromagnetic decays of two new Λ∗ c baryons, Phys

    P. Cho, Strong and electromagnetic decays of two new Λ∗ c baryons, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3295 (1994)

    work page 1994

  43. [43]

    M. J. Savage, E2 strength in the radiative charmed baryon decay Σc* — > Λc γ, Phys. Lett. B 345, 61 (1995) , arXiv:hep- ph/9408294

    work page arXiv 1995

  44. [44]

    B. C. Tiburzi, Baryon electromagnetic properties in partially quenched heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 71, 054504 (2005)

    work page 2005

  45. [45]

    Jiang, X.-L

    N. Jiang, X.-L. Chen, and S.-L. Zhu, Electromagnetic decays of the charmed and bottom baryons in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054017 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    H.-S. Li, L. Meng, Z.-W. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Magnetic moments of the doubly charmed and bottom baryons, Phys. Rev. D 96, 076011 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Magnetic moments of the spin-${3\over 2}$ doubly heavy baryons

    L. Meng, H.-S. Li, Z.-W. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Magnetic moments of the spin- 3 2 doubly heavy baryons, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 869 (2017) , arXiv:1710.08283 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    H.-S. Li, L. Meng, Z.-W. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Radiative decays of the doubly charmed baryons in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Lett. B 777, 169 (2018) , arXiv:1708.03620 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    B. Wang, B. Yang, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Radiative transitions and magnetic moments of the charmed and bottom vector mesons in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 100, 016019 (2019) , arXiv:1905.07742 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    G.-J. Wang, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Radiative decays of the singly heavy baryons in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 99, 034021 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    G.-J. Wang, L. Meng, H.-S. Li, Z.-W. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Magnetic moments of the spin- 1 2 singly charmed baryons in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 98, 054026 (2018)

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    D*-->Dpi and D*-->Dgamma decays: Axial coupling and Magnetic moment of D* meson

    D. Becirevic and B. Haas, D* — > D pi and D* — > D gamma decays: Axial coupling and Magnetic moment of D* meson, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1734 (2011) , arXiv:0903.2407 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  53. [53]

    K. U. Can, G. Erkol, B. Isildak, M. Oka, and T. T. Takahashi, Electromagnetic structure of charmed baryons in Lattice QCD, JHEP 05, 125 , arXiv:1310.5915 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    $\Omega_c \gamma \rightarrow\Omega_c^\ast$ transition in lattice QCD

    H. Bahtiyar, K. U. Can, G. Erkol, and M. Oka, Ωcγ → Ω∗ c transition in lattice QCD, Phys. Lett. B 747, 281 (2015) , arXiv:1503.07361 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    K. U. Can, G. Erkol, M. Oka, and T. T. Takahashi, Look inside charmed-strange baryons from lattice qcd, Phys. Rev. D 92, 114515 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    $\Xi_c \gamma \rightarrow\Xi^\prime_c$ transition in lattice QCD

    H. Bahtiyar, K. U. Can, G. Erkol, M. Oka, and T. T. Takahashi, Ξcγ → Ξ′ c transition in lattice QCD, Phys. Lett. B 772, 121 (2017) , arXiv:1612.05722 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Radiative transitions of doubly charmed baryons in lattice QCD

    H. Bahtiyar, K. U. Can, G. Erkol, M. Oka, and T. T. Takahashi, Radiative transitions of doubly charmed baryons in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114505 (2018) , arXiv:1807.06795 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    K. U. Can, Lattice QCD study of the elastic and transition form factors of charmed baryons, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, 2130013 (2021) , arXiv:2107.13159 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    B. R. Holstein and S. Scherer, Hadron Polarizabilities, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 64, 51 (2014) , arXiv:1401.0140 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    Ericson and J

    T. Ericson and J. Hüfner, Low-frequency photon scattering by nuclei, Nuclear Physics B 57, 604 (1973)

    work page 1973

  61. [61]

    Bernard, N

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and U.-G. Meissner, Chiral expansion of the nucleon’s electromagnetic polarizabilities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1515 (1991)

    work page 1991

  62. [62]

    Bernard, N

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and U. G. Meissner, Nucleons with chiral loops: Electromagnetic polarizabilities, Nucl. Phys. B 373, 346 (1992)

    work page 1992

  63. [63]

    Consistent Calculation of the Nucleon Electromagnetic Polarizabilities in Chiral Perturbation Theory Beyond Next-to-Leading Order

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, A. Schmidt, and U. G. Meissner, Consistent calculation of the nucleon electromagnetic polarizabil- ities in chiral perturbation theory beyond next-to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B 319, 269 (1993) , arXiv:hep-ph/9309211

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  64. [64]

    Aspects of Nucleon Compton Scattering

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, U. G. Meissner, and A. Schmidt, Aspects of nucleon Compton scattering, Z. Phys. A 348, 317 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9311354

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  65. [65]

    Chen, L.-Z

    Y.-K. Chen, L.-Z. Wen, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Electromagnetic polarizabilities of the spin-12 singly heavy baryons in heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054019 (2025) , arXiv:2412.02297 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Wen, Y.-K

    L.-Z. Wen, Y.-K. Chen, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Electromagnetic polarizabilities of the spin- 3 2 baryons in heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1210 (2025) , arXiv:2506.18800 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    M. J. Savage and M. B. Wise, Spectrum of baryons with two heavy quarks, Physics Letters B 248, 177 (1990)

    work page 1990

  68. [68]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Chiral perturbation theory for heavy hadrons and chiral effective field theory for heavy hadronic molecules, Phys. Rept. 1019, 1 (2023) , arXiv:2204.08716 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Llanta and R

    E. Llanta and R. Tarrach, Pion Electromagnetic Polarizabilities and Quarks, Phys. Lett. B 91, 132 (1980)

    work page 1980

  70. [70]

    Bernabeu and R

    J. Bernabeu and R. Tarrach, Long Range Potentials and the Electromagnetic Polarizabilities, Annals Phys. 102, 323 (1976)

    work page 1976

  71. [71]

    Yan, H.-Y

    T.-M. Yan, H.-Y. Cheng, C.-Y. Cheung, G.-L. Lin, Y. C. Lin, and H.-L. Yu, Heavy-quark symmetry and chiral dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1148 (1992)

    work page 1992

  72. [72]

    Y. Ma, L. Meng, Y.-K. Chen, and S.-L. Zhu, Ground state baryons in the flux-tube three-body confinement model using diffusion Monte Carlo, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054035 (2023) , arXiv:2211.09021 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    First Measurement of $\Gamma(D*+)$

    S. Ahmed et al. (CLEO), First measurement of Gamma(D*+), Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 251801 (2001) , arXiv:hep-ex/0108013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  74. [74]

    H. Ohki, H. Matsufuru, and T. Onogi, Determination of B*B pi coupling in unquenched QCD, Phys. Rev. D 77, 094509 (2008), arXiv:0802.1563 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  75. [75]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    BERNARD, N

    V. BERNARD, N. KAISER, and U.-G. MEIßNER, Chiral dynamics in nucleons and nuclei, International Journal of Modern Physics E 04, 193 (1995) , https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301395000092. 20

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218301395000092 1995

  77. [77]

    Introduction to Chiral Perturbation Theory

    S. Scherer, Introduction to chiral perturbation theory, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 27, 277 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0210398

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  78. [78]

    T. R. Hemmert, B. R. Holstein, and J. Kambor, ∆(1232) and the polarizabilities of the nucleon, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5598 (1997)

    work page 1997